<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" specific-use="sps-1.8" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bbr</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>BBR. Brazilian Business Review</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BBR, Braz. Bus. Rev.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1807-734X</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Fucape Business School</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15728/bbr.2022.19.5.4.en</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">00004</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Article</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Understanding Brazilians’ Intentions in Consuming Sustainable Fashion</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="pt">
					<trans-title>Entendendo as intenções dos brasileiros de consumir moda sustentável</trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-6859-4405</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Floriano</surname>
						<given-names>Mikaela Daiane Prestes</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-2538-9089</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Matos</surname>
						<given-names>Celso Augusto de</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1b"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
				<aff id="aff1">
					<label>1.</label>
					<institution content-type="original"> Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.</institution>
					<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos</institution>
					<addr-line>
						<named-content content-type="city">Porto Alegre</named-content>
						<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content>
					</addr-line>
					<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
					<email>mikaelapfloriano@gmail.com</email>
				</aff>
				<aff id="aff1b">
					<label>1.</label>
					<institution content-type="original"> Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.</institution>
					<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos</institution>
					<addr-line>
						<named-content content-type="city">Porto Alegre</named-content>
						<named-content content-type="state">RS</named-content>
					</addr-line>
					<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
					<email>mailto:celsoam@unisinos.br</email>
				</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">
					<email>mikaelapfloriano@gmail.com </email>
				</corresp>
				<corresp id="c2">
					<email>mailto:celsoam@unisinos.br </email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="con" id="fn1">
					<label>AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS</label>
					<p> The authors of this work declare that they worked equally in the stages of conceptualization, investigation, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, writing and editing of this work.</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn2">
					<label>2</label>
					<p> All authors of this work declare that they do not have any type of conflict of interest in relation to the objects covered by it.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<!--<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>30</day>
				<month>09</month>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">-->
			<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
        <season>Sep-Oct</season>
				<year>2022</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>19</volume>
			<issue>5</issue>
			<fpage>525</fpage>
			<lpage>545</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>30</day>
					<month>01</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="rev-recd">
					<day>21</day>
					<month>06</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>18</day>
					<month>09</month>
					<year>2021</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract</title>
				<p>This study analyzed the determinants of sustainable fashion purchasing behavior, incorporating the following factors into the Theory of Planned Behavior: moral obligation, awareness of consequences, and previous sustainable purchasing behavior. A survey was carried out with Brazilian consumers of sustainable fashion, and a total of 179 responses were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The results indicated that ‘moral obligation’ and ‘awareness of consequences’ had an impact on the behavioral attitude of sustainable fashion consumers. Furthermore, of the three TPB components, only attitude and ‘perceived behavioral control’ influenced the purchase intention. Finally, it was found that the actual consumption of sustainable fashion could be explained by the intention and the previous purchase behavior; also, age had a moderating influence on the relationship between the intention and the consumption of fashion. Therefore, this study provides marketers with comprehensive information about the psychological, social, cultural, and demographic determinants of sustainable fashion purchasing behavior.</p>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="pt">
				<title>RESUMO</title>
				<p>Este estudo verificou os determinantes que influenciam o comportamento de consumidores de moda sustentável, incorporando à Teoria do Comportamento Planejado os fatores: obrigação moral, consciência das consequências e o comportamento anterior de compra sustentável. Para isso, realizou-se uma <italic>survey</italic> com consumidores brasileiros de moda sustentável, e um total de 179 respostas foi analisado por meio da Modelagem de Equações Estruturais de Mínimos Quadrados Parciais (PLS-SEM). Os resultados indicaram que a obrigação moral e a consciência das consequências impactaram a atitude comportamental dos consumidores de moda sustentável. Outrossim, dos três componentes da TPB, apenas a atitude e o controle comportamental percebido influenciaram a intenção de compra. Finalmente, verificou-se que o consumo real de moda sustentável é explicado pela intenção e pelo comportamento de compra anterior, sendo que a variável idade moderou a relação entre intenção e o consumo de moda. Este estudo fornece aos profissionais de marketing informações abrangentes sobre os determinantes psicológicos, sociais, culturais e demográficos do comportamento de compra desses produtos.</p>
</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd>Moral Obligation</kwd>
				<kwd>Awareness of Consequences</kwd>
				<kwd>Previous Purchase Behavior</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="pt">
				<title>Palavras-chave:</title>
				<kwd>Obrigação Moral</kwd>
				<kwd>Consciência das Consequências</kwd>
				<kwd>Comportamento de Compra Anterior</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="2"/>
				<table-count count="5"/>
				<equation-count count="0"/>
				<ref-count count="47"/>
				<page-count count="21"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>Sustainable fashion became popular as a way to solve environmental issues caused by the manufacturing industry. It has been criticized because its production and marketing processes are based on continuous consumption, which can have a severe environmental impact (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Armstrong et al., 2015</xref>). Sustainable fashion, therefore, was conceived as a broad term that incorporates principles that are less offensive to society and the planet, such as fair working conditions, reuse, and the production of items from organic and biodegradable materials that do not harm the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
			<p>The popularity of pro-environmental fashion products is a reflection of consumers' understanding of the consequences of their purchasing decisions and the increased interest in sustainability-related topics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al., 2020</xref>), which has made it essential for the industry to adapt to consumers’ demands and to take account of and reduce practices that harm the environment. However, not all ecological awareness and social responsibility is reflected in real intentions and behaviors, when it comes to purchasing fashion products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Jeorgens, 2006</xref>), which often occurs as a consequence of the consumers’ lifestyle of most Western countries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ulanowicz, 2020</xref>).</p>
			<p>Furthermore, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs et al. (2018</xref>) have pointed out that the real demand for ecological products is not observed, due to the lack of knowledge of the motivations that precede the sustainable choices of individuals. Although some investigations have confirmed that aspects such as product variety and design influence sustainable fashion purchase intentions, most of these surveys are carried out on academics or panels of respondents. They may not fully represent actual purchasing behavior for sustainable fashion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
			<p>Therefore, we do not understand the psychological and social determinants of the actual consumption of sustainable fashion very well, and there are uncertainties about what actually characterizes the purchase intentions of these products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al., 2020</xref>). The authors highlight the lack of research into different contexts and profiles, as well as adapting theories previously used to investigate the consumption of traditional fashion, to sustainable fashion. This study therefore aims to use the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to understand the consumption of sustainable fashion by Brazilian consumers.</p>
			<p>TPB refers to one of the main models used to predict the psychological elements that direct consumers to consume certain things (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Scalco et al., 2017</xref>), on the basis that an individual’s intention is dependent on a structure of beliefs in the advantages and disadvantages of behaving in a specific manner, as well as beliefs in the social norms for following the given behavior, and beliefs in control, as perceived by the individual who acts in this way (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
			<p>However, although the focal components of TPB provide good predictions about the behavioral intentions of individuals, some authors highlight the need to include other variables that can improve the explanatory capacity of the original model, since attitude, subjective norms, and control behavior may not fully represent all the theoretical determinants for pro-environmental behavior or intentions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>).</p>
			<p>More specifically, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han and Stoel (2017</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al. (2020</xref>) point out that factors such as moral obligations and conscience can significantly increase the attitudes and intentions of socially-responsible consumption, and the same can be seen in the explanation for pro-environmental behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen, 2020</xref>) and more interest in sustainable products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rezvani et al., 2018</xref>). It also appears that consumers who have a positive experience linked to previous consumption of ecological products are more likely to make new purchase decisions on sustainable goods, as this is a way to achieve similar benefits to those previously acquired from purchasing green products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang &amp; Armstrong, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han, 2020</xref>).</p>
			<p>In this sense, this study aims to verify the determinants that influence the behavior of sustainable fashion consumers, incorporating the following factors into the Theory of Planned Behavior: moral obligation, awareness of consequences, and previous sustainable purchasing behavior. This research is important because it analyses the behavior of consumers of sustainable fashion products from a population that is still poorly understood, and which therefore will satisfy the need identified by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al. (2020</xref>) for analyses into different cultures and contexts that will provide more detailed theories on sustainable fashion. Furthermore, there is little literature on the purchase behavior for sustainable fashion items and what exists is based on exploratory investigations that sometimes fail to jointly analyze the actual purchase intentions and the behaviors for these products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Rausch &amp; Kopplin, 2021</xref>). Therefore, this paper can integrate previous findings that aim to fill the intention-behavior gap in relation to sustainable fashion consumption, by providing a comprehensive view of intention formation and, afterwards, actual purchase consumption.</p>
			<p>Despite the growing interest of consumers in sustainable fashion items, there are still barriers that prevent this type of product becoming more popular. For instance, the low level of knowledge of consumers and that of the industry itself about what constitutes sustainable fashion and the different behavioral factors related to this segment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Moon et al., 2015</xref>). Therefore, as this research is being carried out on those individuals who are real consumers of sustainable fashion, it should be able to obtain information such as a profile for these people, the motivations for this consumption and the types of products that these consumers prefer and consider to be sustainable fashion. It is believed that this information may identify managerial terms by generating knowledge that can be applied to designing more accurate, specific and, consequently, effective marketing strategies for the sustainable fashion industry, in order to not only improve the experience for ecological consumers, but also to increase this audience.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<title>2. Theoretical Background</title>
			<sec>
				<title>2.1. Theory of Planned Behavior and Sustainable Consumption</title>
				<p>The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) has been widely used to predict behavioral intentions. According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen (1991</xref>), an intention refers to a type of conscious action plan that requires a specific behavior and a motivation to carry it out. The intention, therefore, has been accepted as the best predictor of human behavior and, therefore, it is at the center of the TPB. This theory assumes that an individual’s specific behavior is based on intentions that can be predicted by attitudes, subjective norms, and behavioral control, which are the independent focal components of TPB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>).</p>
				<p>Attitude is the degree to which a person has a favorable or unfavorable view of a certain behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). It is directly associated with behavioral intentions and is related to the actual behavior observed in different contexts (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Scalco et al., 2017</xref>). The second determinant is the motivation for a person to engage in a behavior, based on the observations and expectations of other individuals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Klöckner, 2013</xref>), i.e. the subjective norms are the perceived social pressure to act out the behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). Finally, behavioral control refers to whether the behavior is considered to be simple or complex to carry out. It is also based on past experience and potential difficulties (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>).</p>
				<p>By making it easier to understand the psychological factors behind an individual’s behavior, TPB, in recent years, has been used as an alternative way to investigate the intention of consumers in relation to the purchase of different types of products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>). Therefore, this theory is also used to analyze the consumption of sustainable products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fleșeriu et al., 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al., 2020</xref>), demonstrating that the three factors in TPB can be treated as effective predictors to explain the gaps between intention and actual behavior in terms of ecological products. However, TPB is not always a completely satisfactory method to demonstrate specific behaviors. This theory is only suitable to explain planned and intentional behavior, and it is not recommended as a way to analyze subjects' habitual decisions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>).</p>
				<p>On this basis, TPB proved to be effective at predicting specific consumption behaviors for sustainable fashion, because we understand that the acquisition of fashion products is a consequence of volitional control, in other words, it results from a cognitive process in which the subject chooses the frequency and variety of items they will buy, (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bong Ko &amp; Jin, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs et al., 2018</xref>). However, when compared to other research on the consumption of ecological products, there are fewer investigations that used TPB to elucidate the intention to purchase sustainable fashion, especially in relation to the actual consumption of this type of product.</p>
				<p>As well as the psychological characteristics of individuals, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al. (2020</xref>) recommend that other factors need to be considered when verifying the antecedents of the intention to purchase sustainable fashion, due to conflicting results from other studies, which generates uncertainty about which characteristics can be identified as determinants for the consumption of these products. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lundblad and Davies (2016</xref>) point out the importance of attributes related to social and environmental concerns in the consumption of fashion items, since information on social responsibility and awareness of ecological practices results in a greater understanding of the environmental consequences of consumption choices, generating a sense of moral obligation and awareness of the consequences, which results in more sustainable behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
				<p>Furthermore, previous investigations suggest that an individual’s past experience of ecological products, in relation to performance, or the frequency of their involvement in sustainable activities, may be related to pro-environmental purchase decisions, that are a recurrent feature in their lives (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Khare &amp; Sadachar, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang &amp; Armstrong, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han, 2020</xref>). As a result, an extended TPB model is suggested, which includes the variables: moral obligation, awareness of the consequences, and previous purchase behavior, as antecedents to the consumption of sustainable fashion. The theoretical model for this study is therefore presented below.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.2. Hypotheses</title>
				<p>Different factors can motivate people to consume sustainable products, and the literature recognizes that moral and ethical obligations can lead individuals to make consumption choices that can reduce the environmental impact (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lundblad &amp; Davies, 2016</xref>). Moral obligation refers to the subject's guilt or pride in taking a specific action that has a moral context (Beck &amp; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ajzen, 1991</xref>), and, in this study, based on previous investigations, such as that by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al. (2020</xref>), the moral obligation is established by the norms and moral pressure to purchase a particular item, that the consumer is aware of.</p>
				<p>Feelings of moral obligation are essential in order to develop pro-environmental intentions and behaviors, since the actions of each individual are directly dependent on their moral standards (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wu et al., 2020</xref>). The moral obligation, therefore, can act as a self-regulatory mechanism that determines individual consumer choices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wu et al., 2020</xref>). Therefore, when considering environmental concerns, an individual’s predilections can be motivated by a sense of ethical and moral obligation, which culminates in beliefs that reduce future feelings of guilt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
				<p>In view of this, previous studies have incorporated the moral obligation into TPB in order to increase the explanatory ability of this model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al., 2020</xref>).The study by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bhutto et al. (2021</xref>), based on this idea, aimed to assess, empirically, the association between moral obligation and subjective norms, one of the original components of TPB, in order to show that morality does not have a significant effect on the motivations for sustainable consumption, based on the observations and expectations of other people. It has also been suggested that moral obligation is related to the original TPB model as an antecedent factor of behavioral attitudes, in contrast to the authors' proposition, by treating the moral obligation as a personal norm that is intrinsic to each subject and that behavioral attitudes refer to individual assessments of the individual to determine a behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). Therefore:</p>
				<p><bold>H1</bold> Moral obligation has a positive impact on the behavioral attitude of consumers of sustainable fashion.</p>
				<p>Consumer awareness determines how consumers think about their attitudes and behavior, and this factor is considered as one of the determinants associated with responsible and sustainable consumption choices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al., 2020</xref>). This occurs because the consumer, being aware of the environmental problems generated by consumption, becomes favorable towards choosing to purchase green products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Laroche et al., 1996</xref>).</p>
				<p>These propositions were empirically tested by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Razzaq et al. (2018</xref>), who verified that there was a positive association between ‘awareness of the consequences’ and the intention to purchase sustainable fashion products. Although this has been verified, we can still look at theoretical gaps on how ‘awareness of the consequences’ influences the purchase decisions of individuals in relation to sustainable products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al., 2020</xref>) and how this is related to the TPB model. Therefore, in order to examine the effect of awareness on ecological consumption, it is suggested that ‘awareness of consequences’ is positively related to a favorable attitude towards the consumption of sustainable fashion products. Therefore, we propose that:</p>
				<p><bold>H2</bold> Awareness of consequences has a positive impact on the behavioral attitude of sustainable fashion consumers.</p>
				<p>Attitude affects the degree to which an individual evaluates the performance of a specific behavior, in a favorable or negative way. Therefore, the greater the positive attitude, the greater the probability that the individual will act according to the behavior in question (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). A favorable attitude towards environmental concerns and ecological products has been identified in previous studies as an influence on the intention to make sustainable purchases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen &amp; Hung, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Paul et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ru et al., 2019</xref>). Similarly, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zheng &amp; Chi (2015</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs et al. (2018</xref>), examining this relationship with regard to the consumption of fashion products, suggest that, where consumers have favorable beliefs in relation to sustainable fashion products, their behavioral attitude will exert a positive intent to purchase. Therefore, when we examine the prediction based on attitude in the intention to consume, we suggest that this construct is linked to attitudes in favor of the actual consumption of sustainable fashion. Therefore:</p>
				<p><bold>H3</bold> Behavioral attitude has a positive impact on the intention to purchase sustainable fashion.</p>
				<p>Reference groups are believed to be important agents in consumers' purchasing decisions. They have a significant impact on how an individual behaves (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). Subjective norms, therefore, have been linked strongly to the intention to purchase different types of ecological products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ru et al., 2019</xref>). They have also been associated with the purchase of clothing items (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Rahman et al. (2020</xref>) stated that individuals tend to be more influenced by social issues, as related to the consumption of ecological fashion, than by the environmental impact caused by their purchase decisions, which confirms that the consumption choices of consumers tend to be significantly affected by social influence (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Ciasullo et al., 2017</xref>). Therefore, on the basis that consumption is not only instigated by characteristics intrinsic to the individual, and in order to understand the influence of social elements on the behavior of consumers of sustainable fashion, it is suggested that:</p>
				<p><bold>H4</bold> Subjective norms have a positive impact on the intention to purchase sustainable fashion.</p>
				<p>Perceived behavioral control characterizes the degree to which an individual believes a specific behavior is easy or difficult to follow, considering factors such as skill, confidence, time, and money (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). In the context of socially responsible products, the perceived control variable is identified as a predictor of the intention to purchase these items (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Paul et al., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mohiuddin et al., 2018</xref>), not being observed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang and Armstrong (2018</xref>) a significant relationship between perceived behavioral control and adherence to consumption and services related to sustainable clothing, contradicting previous findings that found an association between perceived control and ecological fashion (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bong Ko &amp; Jin, 2017</xref>). Therefore, having verified where the roles for this component of TBP converge, in relation to the intentions to purchase sustainable fashion, the hypothesis is:</p>
				<p><bold>H5</bold> Perceived behavioral control has a positive impact on the intention to purchase sustainable fashion.</p>
				<p>Intention prevails as the closest variable for acting on a behavior. It also serves as a joining factor between the components of TPB and the result of a behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Klöckner, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Li et al., 2018</xref>). The intention to purchase ecological products has had positive effects on sustainable purchasing behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al., 2020</xref>). In relation to fashion, few investigations have identified the association between the purchase intention and actual consumption of sustainable fashion products. There has been a lack of detail on how the existing fashion literature, which is directly linked to TPB concepts and the intention to purchase (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs et al., 2018</xref>), can be applied to the consumption of sustainable goods (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al. (2020</xref>) states that in order to review and utilize previous phenomena to create new pro-environmental theories in relation to fashion, demographic factors should be considered, in order to understand which personal aspects need to be actually addressed to encourage the intention and the consumption of sustainable fashion, so that they can be used to complement the effects of psychological characteristics in predicting purchase decisions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al., 2020</xref>). The gender and age variables are significant indicators in determining purchase intentions for clothing items (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Rahman et al., 2020</xref>) and green products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bloodhart &amp; Swim, 2020</xref>). Individuals who are young or female are more likely to purchase clothes and shoes produced through fair trade, or from organic or recyclable materials (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baier et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
				<p>Therefore, if we treat intention as a determinant construct for predicting ecological behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Li et al., 2018</xref>), the pro-environmental intention in relation to fashion could be suggested to be decisive in turning behaviors into real purchases of sustainable products, while also recognizing that demographic variables are part of this equation. Therefore, it is suggested that:</p>
				<p><bold>H6</bold> A sustainable purchase intention has a positive impact on the consumption of sustainable fashion.</p>
				<p><bold>H7</bold> Demographic factors (a) gender and (b) age have a moderating effect on the relationship between purchase intention and the consumption of sustainable fashion behavior and this relationship is more significant among younger and female individuals.</p>
				<p>Although the intention is acknowledged as a significant determinant that positively influences the occurrence of many different behaviors, this study suggests that this construct may not be the only critical motivator in achieving sustainable fashion consumption. This is because consumers who have a positive experience or perception of green products may develop new intentions to continue purchasing sustainable goods as a way to act on behaviors that will provide them with benefits similar to those they have previously acquired (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang &amp; Armstrong, 2018</xref>). Therefore, on the basis that repeated behaviors can establish continuous intentions and behaviors, and that past sustainable experiences tend to result in further ecological purchases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Khare &amp; Sadachar, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han, 2020</xref>), it is suggested that, together with the purchase intention, past purchasing behavior is directly related to the consumption of sustainable fashion. It acts as a complementary construct to TPB. Therefore, it is proposed that:</p>
				<p><bold>H8</bold> Past sustainable purchasing behavior has a positive impact on sustainable fashion consumption.</p>
				<p>The structured theoretical model for this study is presented in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f1">
						<label>Figure 1.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Theoretical model</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="1808-2386-bbr-19-05-525-gf1.jpg"/>
						<attrib><italic>Source</italic>: Authors (2021).</attrib>
					</fig>
				</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="methods">
			<title>3. Methods</title>
			<p>This investigation followed a quantitative approach, using a survey design (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hair et al., 2014</xref>). The target population were consumers of sustainable fashion. Brazil is one of the largest textile producers in the world, producing around 9.8 billion items of clothing and household items, being responsible for the use of large amounts of water and the generation of waste (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Sebrae, 2015</xref>). Therefore, the analysis of the sustainable fashion purchase behavior of Brazilians is pertinent. By not having knowledge and access to the parameter of consumers of these products, a non-probabilistic convenience sampling was adopted (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hair et al., 2014</xref>).</p>
			<p>Data was collected through the application of a structured and self-administered questionnaire, which was developed based on previous studies. Hence, eight scales validated in previous research were used. These instruments translate the core constructs of the theoretical model, and are detailed in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref>.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>Table 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Scales</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="center">Scale</th>
								<th align="center">References</th>
								<th align="center">Items</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Subjective Norms</td>
								<td align="center" rowspan="4">Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bong Ko and Jin (2017</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al. (2020</xref>).</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Attitude</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Perceived Behavioral Control</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Purchase Intention</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Moral Obligation</td>
								<td align="center">Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si et al. (2020</xref>).</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Awareness of Consequences</td>
								<td align="center">Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han (2020</xref>).</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Past Purchasing Behavior</td>
								<td align="center">Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang and Armstrong (2018</xref>) and <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han (2020</xref>).</td>
								<td align="center">2</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">Sustainable Fashion Consumption</td>
								<td align="center">Adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Fischer et al. (2017</xref>).</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<p>Source: Authors (2021).</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>The instruments were translated into Portuguese and adapted to meet the objective of this study, using a seven-point Likert-type scale so that respondents could demonstrate the degree of agreement/disagreement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hair et al., 2014</xref>). Questions concerning the sociodemographic profile (gender, age, marital status, education, and income) and questions about sustainable consumption activities (2 items) were also included, that is, the type and motivations for the consumption of sustainable fashion.</p>
			<p> Following the recommendations of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al. (2020</xref>) on the need to improve research with consumers who actually consume sustainable fashion items, this study seeks to investigate those individuals who can be considered as actual consumers of these products. In this rstudy , the actual consumer is considered to be an individual who has been purchasing sustainable fashion products for at least one year, following <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Xiao (2019</xref>)’ guidelines in relation to the period in which a behavior can be considered sustainable. Thus, a filter question was included to identify whether or not the respondents were part of the target population, asking at the beginning of the questionnaire about the frequency of purchases of sustainable fashion items. Those who answered consuming sustainable products for more than a year were invited to continue with the survey.</p>
			<p>To determine the minimum sample size, considering the lack of knowledge and access to the parameter of the sustainable fashion consumer population, the G*Power software was used. Therefore, the parameters proposed by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hair et al. (2016</xref>) were adopted: a) average effect size (<italic>f</italic>² = 0.15), b) 95% statistical power, c) 5% significance level, and the number of predictors related to the adopted model. The result revealed by the G*Power software pointed out that the sample should have at least 138 sustainable fashion consumers. In addition, seeking to ensure that the proposed model was carried out reliably, the recommendation suggested by Hair et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2009</xref>), which predicts that for each variable observed, information from at least five respondents must be obtained. Therefore, when verifying the 28 items of the collection instrument, a sample of 140 observations was determined as a minimum size.</p>
			<p>To ensure the correct conceptual structure, we tested the questionnaire by two marketing researchers and twenty consumers of sustainable products. This pretest aimed to verify the items in order to assess aspects such as content, formulation, and writing. After the pre-test, the research instrument was applied completely online, using Google Forms, shared with Brazilian groups dedicated to sustainable fashion and conscientious consumption on the Facebook social network. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al. (2020</xref>) point out that social media are the main channels used by consumers to obtain information about sustainable products, also serving as a means for fashion retailers to increase the intention and positive attitudes of purchasing their ecological products. Data collection took place during the month of October 2020.</p>
			<p>Descriptive statistics were used to verify the profile of respondents and information about sustainable fashion consumption (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hair et al., 2014</xref>) through the IBM SPSS 20.0 software. To analyze the proposed structure, we used structural equation modeling through partial least squares (PLS) software. PLS was selected because of its ability to accurately analyze samples that have small sizes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair et al., 2019</xref>).</p>
			<p>PLS approach is based on the following steps: model specification, evaluation of the measurement model and analysis of the structural model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair et al., 2019</xref>). These three phases are carried out and explained in the next section. Furthermore, seeking to assess whether the relationship between purchase intention and sustainable fashion consumption changes due to the sociodemographic characteristics of the sample (H7ab), we tested the effects of gender and age on the model's relationships through Multigroup Analysis (PLS- MGA). This technique concerns a set of different procedures developed to compare estimates between two or more groups of data (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Sarstedt et al., 2011</xref>).</p>
			<p>For the multigroup analysis, the variables gender and age were used as criteria for dividing the sample into subsamples. Gender was categorized based on the gender of the respondents, with female individuals taking the value 1 and male people taking the value 2. Concerning the age group, the age of the individuals was coded taking into account those people considered as young , aged up to 29 years and assigned the value 1, and those aged over 30 years, considered adults (not young people) and who assume the value 2, this division occurred in accordance with Brazilian legislation, which determines as young people aged between 15 and 29 years old (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Brasil, 2013</xref>). SmartPLS V. 3.3 software was adopted to perform these analyses.</p>
			<p>The results obtained in the field research are discussed below.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results">
			<title>4. Results</title>
			<p>The study obtained responses from a total of 196 participants. After initial screening, 16 responses were excluded for not matching the desired profile for this investigation or for presenting missing data. Thus, the final study sample used for the analyzes consisted of 179 valid responses.</p>
			<sec>
				<title>4.1. Sample Profile</title>
				<p>The demographic profile of respondents was examined based on the variables: gender, age, marital status, education and income. In this sense, it is possible to observe that more than half of respondents (55.3%) are female consumers, aged 29 years or less (55.9%) and most participants were single at the time of the survey (65.6%). Regarding education, 43% have higher education as their highest academic qualification. Regarding monthly income, the most frequent response among respondents was R$1,001 to R$3,000 (33.5%).</p>
				<p>As for the type of sustainable fashion consumption, 70.90% of the sample purchases at a thrift store, since in these places consumers claim to find exclusive pieces that represent a better cost-benefit ratio by combining a more conscious environmental philosophy with fair prices. Furthermore, the consumption of recycled and resignified products (13.40%) was also highlighted by respondents.</p>
				<p>Concerning the motivations to consume sustainable fashion, it is possible to verify that the respondents adhered to the purchase of ecological products when they understood that their consumption activities were contributing to the aggravation of environmental (55.29%) and social (29.61%) problems. These findings show that sustainable fashion consumers perceive the consequences generated by their purchasing decisions, at the same time seeking personal benefits inherent to consumption.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>4.2 Measurement Properties and Structural Model</title>
				<p>Initially, the basic measurement model was investigated to verify the reliability and validity of the scales that were used. First, the factor loadings were analyzed, indicating that the item &quot;SFC4&quot;, a component of the Sustainable Fashion Consumption construct, had a loading less than 0.5, and, therefore, was excluded from the analysis. Subsequently, all constructs obtained satisfactory loads for carrying out the other assessments. The results observed for each variable are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>Table 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Descriptive statistics and factor loading of the variables</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="center">Variable</th>
									<th align="center">Factor Loading</th>
									<th align="center">Mean</th>
									<th align="center">Standard Deviation</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Moral Obligation (Overall)</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><bold>6.018</bold></td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.978</bold></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I think that it's my duty to consume sustainable fashion products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.872</td>
									<td align="center">6.40</td>
									<td align="center">1.078</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I would feel guilty if I didn't consume sustainable fashion products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.716</td>
									<td align="center">5.03</td>
									<td align="center">1.692</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">To consume sustainable fashion products is in line with my principles.</td>
									<td align="center">0.820</td>
									<td align="center">6.28</td>
									<td align="center">1.082</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I think that all people should consume sustainable fashion products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.732</td>
									<td align="center">6.36</td>
									<td align="center">1.130</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Awareness of Consequences (Overall)</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><bold>6.702</bold></td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.535</bold></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">To consume fashion products in an unsustainable way will contribute to the increase of environmental impacts such as the emission of polluting gases.</td>
									<td align="center">0.647</td>
									<td align="center">6.79</td>
									<td align="center">0.537</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">To consume fashion products in an unsustainable way will contribute to the exhaustion of natural resources.</td>
									<td align="center">0.684</td>
									<td align="center">6.93</td>
									<td align="center">0.352</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">To consume fashion products in an unsustainable way will contribute to precarious working conditions and improper remuneration for employees in this sector.</td>
									<td align="center">0.786</td>
									<td align="center">6.70</td>
									<td align="center">0.762</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">To consume fashion products in an unsustainable way will cause environmental impacts that will have short- and long-term consequences and effects.</td>
									<td align="center">0.746</td>
									<td align="center">6.39</td>
									<td align="center">1.462</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Attitude (Overall)</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><bold>6.614</bold></td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.671</bold></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">It's advisable for me to consume sustainable fashion products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.780</td>
									<td align="center">6.68</td>
									<td align="center">0.745</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">It’s beneficial for me to consume sustainable fashion products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.884</td>
									<td align="center">6.68</td>
									<td align="center">0.769</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">It’s enjoyable for me to consume sustainable fashion products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.795</td>
									<td align="center">6.58</td>
									<td align="center">0.813</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">It’s worthwhile for me to consume sustainable fashion products instead of conventional products to contribute to environmental protection.</td>
									<td align="center">0.811</td>
									<td align="center">6.52</td>
									<td align="center">0.950</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Subjective Norms (Overall)</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><bold>4.463</bold></td>
									<td align="center"><bold>1.375</bold></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">People who are important to me, as family and friends, think I should purchase sustainable apparel products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.802</td>
									<td align="center">4.02</td>
									<td align="center">1.679</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">People who are important to me would approve of my purchasing sustainable apparel products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.876</td>
									<td align="center">3.88</td>
									<td align="center">1.667</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">People who are important to me want me to purchase sustainable apparel products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.834</td>
									<td align="center">5.49</td>
									<td align="center">1.500</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Perceived Behavioral Control (Overall)</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><bold>6.102</bold></td>
									<td align="center"><bold>1.025</bold></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I believe I have the ability to continue to buy sustainable apparel products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.855</td>
									<td align="center">6.22</td>
									<td align="center">1.029</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">If it’s entirely up to me, I am confident that I am able to continue purchasing sustainable apparel products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.933</td>
									<td align="center">6.25</td>
									<td align="center">1.125</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I am very confident that I will continue to buy sustainable apparel products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.916</td>
									<td align="center">6.27</td>
									<td align="center">1.154</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">Whether or not I purchase sustainable apparel products is entirely up to me.</td>
									<td align="center">0.736</td>
									<td align="center">5.68</td>
									<td align="center">1.475</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Past Purchasing Behavior (Overall)</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><bold>5.505</bold></td>
									<td align="center"><bold>1.171</bold></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I have often tried to make sustainable fashion products purchase that is less harmful to the environment.</td>
									<td align="center">0.882</td>
									<td align="center">5.21</td>
									<td align="center">1.398</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I have frequently chosen the product that contributes to least to pollution when there is a choice.</td>
									<td align="center">0.951</td>
									<td align="center">5.80</td>
									<td align="center">1.148</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Purchase Intention (Overall)</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><bold>6.541</bold></td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.845</bold></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I intend to purchase sustainable apparel products instead of conventional products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.907</td>
									<td align="center">6.57</td>
									<td align="center">0.880</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I plan to purchase sustainable apparel products instead of conventional products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.890</td>
									<td align="center">6.42</td>
									<td align="center">1.054</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I want to purchase sustainable apparel products instead of conventional products.</td>
									<td align="center">0.913</td>
									<td align="center">6.63</td>
									<td align="center">0.873</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Sustainable Fashion Consumption (Overall)</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"><bold>4.467</bold></td>
									<td align="center"><bold>1.309</bold></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I choose clothing items from fair trade production, even if they are more expensive than conventional clothes.</td>
									<td align="center">0.863</td>
									<td align="center">5.40</td>
									<td align="center">1.287</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I choose clothing items from organic production (e.g., made from organic cotton).</td>
									<td align="center">0.837</td>
									<td align="center">4.08</td>
									<td align="center">1.711</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">I choose clothing items with labels that guarantee absence of chemical pollutants.</td>
									<td align="center">0.826</td>
									<td align="center">3.91</td>
									<td align="center">1.637</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p><italic>Source</italic>: Authors (2021).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>The reliability of the constructs was verified through the values of Cronbach's Alpha and the composite reliability, being observed that for both indexes all constructs reached values above the recommended minimum (0.70), supporting the reliability of the scales. The average variance extracted was also verified, the indices obtained were satisfactory, and the eight latent variables reached values greater than 0.5. These results confirm the convergent validity of all items in the model.</p>
				<p>Discriminant validity was verified from the analysis of the Fornell-Larcker criterion, in which validity is determined by the square root values of the AVE of each latent variable, which must be higher than the correlation with other constructs of the model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair et al., 2019</xref>). The indices obtained support the discriminant validity of the constructs (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>Table 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Measurement model</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="center"> </th>
									<th align="center">α</th>
									<th align="center">CR</th>
									<th align="center">AVE</th>
									<th align="center">1</th>
									<th align="center">2</th>
									<th align="center">3</th>
									<th align="center">4</th>
									<th align="center">5</th>
									<th align="center">6</th>
									<th align="center">7</th>
									<th align="center">8</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">1-MO</td>
									<td align="center">0.794</td>
									<td align="center">0.867</td>
									<td align="center">0.620</td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.788</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">2-AC</td>
									<td align="center">0.749</td>
									<td align="center">0.809</td>
									<td align="center">0.515</td>
									<td align="center">0.349</td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.718</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">3-AT</td>
									<td align="center">0.835</td>
									<td align="center">0.890</td>
									<td align="center">0.670</td>
									<td align="center">0.726</td>
									<td align="center">0.440</td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.818</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">4-SN</td>
									<td align="center">0.804</td>
									<td align="center">0.876</td>
									<td align="center">0.702</td>
									<td align="center">0.215</td>
									<td align="center">0.242</td>
									<td align="center">0.298</td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.838</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">5-PBC</td>
									<td align="center">0.884</td>
									<td align="center">0.921</td>
									<td align="center">0.746</td>
									<td align="center">0.580</td>
									<td align="center">0.265</td>
									<td align="center">0.665</td>
									<td align="center">0.248</td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.864</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">6-PI</td>
									<td align="center">0.888</td>
									<td align="center">0.930</td>
									<td align="center">0.816</td>
									<td align="center">0.567</td>
									<td align="center">0.405</td>
									<td align="center">0.715</td>
									<td align="center">0.298</td>
									<td align="center">0.650</td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.904</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">7-PPB</td>
									<td align="center">0.818</td>
									<td align="center">0.913</td>
									<td align="center">0.840</td>
									<td align="center">-0.020</td>
									<td align="center">-0.049</td>
									<td align="center">0.075</td>
									<td align="center">-0.043</td>
									<td align="center">0.166</td>
									<td align="center">0.123</td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.917</bold></td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">8-SFC</td>
									<td align="center">0.799</td>
									<td align="center">0.880</td>
									<td align="center">0.710</td>
									<td align="center">0.334</td>
									<td align="center">0.203</td>
									<td align="center">0.413</td>
									<td align="center">0.272</td>
									<td align="center">0.585</td>
									<td align="center">0.399</td>
									<td align="center">0.181</td>
									<td align="center"><bold>0.842</bold></td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p>Note. MO - Moral Obligation; AC - Awareness of Consequences; AT - Attitude; SN - Subjective Norms; PBC - Perceived Behavioral Control; PI Purchase Intention; PPB - Past Purchasing Behavior; SFC - Sustainable Fashion Consumption;</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN4">
								<p>Source: Research data (2021).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>To estimate the research model, a bootstrapping procedure was used through 5,000 repetitions (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). For the assessment of collinearity, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair et al. (2019</xref>) propose that acceptable values ​​for the variance inflation factors need to be less than 5. In this study, the internal VIF presented indices lower than 1.856, showing that there is no multicollinearity in the model. In addition, another assumption concerns the size of the effect represented by the f² indicator, which demonstrates the absolute value of the individual contribution (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair et al., 2019</xref>). In this sense, it was possible to verify that all relationships had effects in the model.</p>
				<p>Analyzing the indices obtained for the t-value, it is possible to determine the significance of the proposed hypotheses. With a significance level of 5%, the path coefficient is considered significant if the t statistic is equal to or greater than 1.96. Thus, from the established hypotheses, six relationships were statistically significant, while H4 did not show statistical support (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Table 4</xref>). It is observed that the relationship between moral obligation and behavioral attitude is positive and significant (β = 0.652; <italic>t</italic> = 10.888; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001), providing support for H1. Similarly, H2, aware of the consequences on attitude, obtained satisfactory indices to ensure statistical support (β = 0.212; <italic>t</italic> = 2.827; <italic>p</italic> = 0.005).</p>
				<p>H3, which predicts a relationship between attitude and purchase intention, was also supported (β = 0.489; <italic>t</italic> = 6.640; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001). In contrast, the proposed relationship between subjective norms and the intention to purchase sustainable fashion products was not significant (β = 0.077; <italic>t</italic> = 1.870; <italic>p</italic> = 0.060), so H4 was not supported. H5, which proposed the impact of behavioral control on the intention to purchase sustainable fashion products, also showed statistical significance (β = 0.306; <italic>t</italic> = 4.026; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001). In turn, H6 and H8, which verified the impact of purchase intention and previous purchase behavior on the consumption of sustainable fashion, indicated direct and positive relationships (H6: β = 0.383; <italic>t</italic> = 4.720; <italic>p</italic> = 0.001; H8: β = 0.134; <italic>t</italic> = 1.970; <italic>p</italic> = 0.049), with purchase intention showing the most expressive relationship.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t4">
						<label>Table 4</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Structural model result</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
                            <thead>
                             <tr>
									<th align="center">Hypothesis</th>
									<th align="center">VIF</th>
									<th align="center">f²</th>
									<th align="center">β</th>
									<th align="center">t-value</th>
									<th align="center">Sig</th>
									<th align="center">R²</th>
									<th align="center">Decision</th>
								</tr>
                            </thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H1 MO --> AT</bold></td>
									<td align="center">1.139</td>
									<td align="center">0.836</td>
									<td align="center">0.652</td>
									<td align="center">10.888</td>
									<td align="center">0.001</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">0.567</td>
									<td align="center">Supported</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H2 AC --> AT</bold></td>
									<td align="center">1.139</td>
									<td align="center">0.091</td>
									<td align="center">0.212</td>
									<td align="center">2.827</td>
									<td align="center">0.005</td>
									<td align="center">Supported</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H3 AT --> PI</bold></td>
									<td align="center">1.856</td>
									<td align="center">0.301</td>
									<td align="center">0.489</td>
									<td align="center">6.640</td>
									<td align="center">0.001</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="3">0.572</td>
									<td align="center">Supported</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H4 SN --> PI</bold></td>
									<td align="center">1.103</td>
									<td align="center">0.013</td>
									<td align="center">0.077</td>
									<td align="center">1.879</td>
									<td align="center">0.060</td>
									<td align="center">Not supported</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H5 PBC --> PI</bold></td>
									<td align="center">1.802</td>
									<td align="center">0.121</td>
									<td align="center">0.306</td>
									<td align="center">4.026</td>
									<td align="center">0.001</td>
									<td align="center">Supported</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H6 PI --> SFC</bold></td>
									<td align="center">1.015</td>
									<td align="center">0.175</td>
									<td align="center">0.383</td>
									<td align="center">4.720</td>
									<td align="center">0.001</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">0.177</td>
									<td align="center">Supported</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H8 PPB --> SFC</bold></td>
									<td align="center">1.015</td>
									<td align="center">0.021</td>
									<td align="center">0.134</td>
									<td align="center">1.970</td>
									<td align="center">0.049</td>
									<td align="center">Supported</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN5">
								<p>Source: Research data (2021).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>The results of the structural investigation (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref>) indicate that the proposed model has 56.7% of explanatory power for attitude. With regard to path coefficients, moral obligation had the most significant relationship (β = 0.836). When the R² value obtained for the purchase intention was verified, its variation explained by the attitude, subjective norms and behavioral control was found to be 57.2%, with the purchase attitude showing the most significant relationship (β = 0.301 ). Finally, it was possible to observe that the proposed model has 17.7% of explanatory power for the consumption of sustainable fashion, in which the purchase intention had the most expressive association with this construct (β = 0.383).</p>
				<p>The values obtained determine that the dependent variables Attitude and Purchase Intention had great explanatory effects, while Sustainable Fashion Consumption had a medium effect. In addition, the Stone Geisser Q² value was used to verify the predictive relevance of the model (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair et al., 2019</xref>). The results show that the Q² values for Attitude, Intention to Purchase and Sustainable Fashion Consumption are, respectively, 0.365, 0.451 and 0.113. Considering that these values are above zero (Hair et al., 2019), it is evident that the research model had predictive relevance.</p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Figure 2</xref> summarizes the results of the structural model evaluation.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f2">
						<label>Figure 2.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Structural model</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="1808-2386-bbr-19-05-525-gf2.jpg"/>
						<attrib>Note: ** = &lt;0.05, *** = p&lt;0.001, n.s. = not significant.</attrib>
						<attrib><italic>Source</italic>: Authors (2021).</attrib>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>Finally, the standardized RMSR was analyzed, which refers to a criterion that represents the difference between the matrix of observed correlations and the matrix underlying the model, serving as a measure of goodness-of-fit that can be used to avoid specification errors. Assuming the value recommended by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hu and Bentler (1999</xref>), the model in this study shows an acceptable fit of 0.08.</p>
				<p>The results of the estimated model are presented, below, the effect of the gender and age variables in the relationships discussed herein is verified.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>4.3. Multigroup Analysis</title>
				<p>A Multigroup Analysis was used to analyze whether the relationships between the purchase intention and sustainable fashion consumption constructs vary depending on the groups of the categorical variables gender and age (H7ab). To analyze these groups, the PLS-MGA approach was adopted, which determines significant differences between the groups when they present indices below 0.05 or above 0.95 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Sarstedt et al., 2011</xref>), the results are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t5">
						<label>Table 5</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Multigroup Comparison</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col span="2"/>
								<col span="2"/>
								<col span="2"/>
							</colgroup>
                            <thead>
                            <tr>
									<th align="center" rowspan="2">Relationship</th>
									<th align="center" colspan="2">Female </th>
									<th align="center" colspan="2">Male </th>
									<th align="center" colspan="2">PLS-MGA </th>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<th align="center">β</th>
									<th align="center">p-value</th>
									<th align="center">β</th>
									<th align="center">p-value</th>
									<th align="center">β (Female vs. Male)</th>
									<th align="center">p-value (Female vs. Male)</th>
								</tr>
                            </thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>7a</sub> PI --> SFC</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0.375</td>
									<td align="center">0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.420</td>
									<td align="center">0.002</td>
									<td align="center">-0.045</td>
									<td align="center">0.761</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2"><bold>Relationship</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Young</bold> </td>
									<td align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Not Young</bold> </td>
									<td align="center" colspan="2"><bold>PLS-MGA</bold> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">β</td>
									<td align="center">p-value </td>
									<td align="center">β </td>
									<td align="center">p-value</td>
									<td align="center">β (Young vs. Not Young)</td>
									<td align="center">p-value (Young vs. Not Young)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>7b</sub> PI --> SFC</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0.399</td>
									<td align="center">0.000 </td>
									<td align="center">0.394 </td>
									<td align="center">0.001</td>
									<td align="center">0.005</td>
									<td align="center">0.963</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN6">
								<p>Source: Research data (2021).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>Considering the evidenced indices, the group of female respondents showed a significant and positive path coefficient (β = 0.375, <italic>p</italic> = 0.001). This result was also verified for male individuals (β = 0.420, <italic>p</italic> = 0.002). However, the PLS-MGA p-value results demonstrate that there is no significant difference between the two groups, indicating that the relationship between purchase intention and actual consumption of sustainable fashion does not differ when considering the gender of the respondents in this study. Therefore, the H7a was partially supported, since the impact of gender in the proposed relationship is verified, however, not observing, in the researched sample, the significant difference between individuals of different genders.</p>
				<p> Regarding age, both individuals considered young (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001), aged up to 29 years, and those referring to the group of non-youth (adults) (<italic>p</italic> = 0.001), obtained significant path coefficients. Observing the p value of PLS-MGA, there is a significant difference between the groups (<italic>p</italic> = 0.963 &gt; 0.95), indicating that the relationship between purchase intention and actual consumption of sustainable fashion was, in this study, more intense in the young group than in the group of individuals aged over 29 years (β = 0.399). Therefore, these findings provide support for H7b.</p>
				<p>Next, the results found are discussed.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="discussion">
			<title>5. Discussion</title>
			<p>Based on field research on Brazilian individuals who have been consuming sustainable fashion products for at least a year, it was found that the attitude towards sustainable fashion consumption was influenced by moral obligation and the awareness of the consequences. This result enables us to make the inference that, as the individual starts considering the environmental and social impact of the way they consume and as they become aware of the moral pressure to take less harmful purchasing actions, they may adopt a favorable attitude towards a more environmentally-conscious purchasing behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Laroche et al., 1996</xref>).</p>
			<p>Therefore, it is believed that, based on the sample examined, being aware of negative environmental consequences might mitigate unsustainable attitudes, and make individuals more willing to participate in ecological consumption. This willingness is also related to feelings of moral obligation by which individuals exercise self-control (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wu et al., 2020</xref>). Moral obligation and environmental awareness are personal factors that encourage actions that are more beneficial to the environment as a precaution against future problems and to alleviate the feeling of guilt (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
			<p>In this research, unlike previous studies, only two of the components of the original TPB model had an impact on the intention to purchase sustainable fashion products (i.e. attitude and perceived behavioral control). This means that the intention to purchase sustainable fashion is influenced by favorable behavioral beliefs about this type of product, whether in relation to the beliefs in factors intrinsic to individuals about how easy it is to act on a behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>), or to beliefs favorable to sustainable fashion itself (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zheng &amp; Chi, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
			<p>This study demonstrated that social pressure does not directly influence the purchase intention of actual consumers of sustainable fashion. This contradicts previous research that showed that subjective norms determine the intention to purchase sustainable items (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ru et al., 2019</xref>), and corroborates the investigation by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Rausch and Kopplin (2021</xref>), who did not obtain any statistical support to evidence the impact of the subjective norm on the intention to purchase sustainable clothing. Analyzing this alongside the other results, it appears that, for the sample investigated from Brazil, the choice of eco-fashion products is more closely related to individual factors and the environmental impact caused by consumption than the influences and pressure from third parties. This is a factor that must be considered when creating a promotional strategy for these products.</p>
			<p>This study demonstrated that, in relation to the result that subjective norms do not exert a significant effect on the intention of Brazilian consumers to purchase sustainable fashion products, there might be two different reasons for this result. First, although the sample investigated demonstrated positive previous attitudes, intentions, and behaviors in relation to sustainable fashion, the lack of a collective norm or values ​​in Brazil on conscious consumption may explain the lack of social elements that further encourages consumer behavior regarding sustainable items. This argument is supported by surveys in Brazil, that demonstrate that only 24% of consumers can be regarded as ecologically aware (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Boreki, 2021</xref>). Therefore, it may be the case that if collective environmental awareness became more established, this could emphasize the individual desire of consumers to respond to such a social norm and, therefore, there would be an increase in intention and choice for sustainable products. As this is not the case, the lack of social influence on consumers' intentions to acquire sustainable fashion may be a reflection of the low social demand for sustainable consumption, as perceived by Brazilians.</p>
			<p>Another explanation for the verified result may be linked to the nature of the fashion that interested the consumers in the sample. Purchases of fashion products are considered a type of consumption that is intrinsically linked to the consumers’ identity. It is related to providing for their psychological needs, such as improving self-esteem and self-expression (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lundblad &amp; Davies, 2016</xref>). According to the authors, sustainable fashion items can be the opposite of a conventional understanding of fashion. They give consumers a greater sense of individuality and comfort, as one of the goals of the sustainable fashion consumer is to distance themselves from the perceptions of other people and express their opinions and values ​​through their purchases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lundblad &amp; Davies, 2016</xref>).The lack of statistical support for the relationship between subjective norms and intention to purchase sustainable fashion, therefore, may be due to the sample's desire for sustainable items that meet individual aspirations, which is different from the traditional understanding of fashion as a form of social conformity and compliance with social norms.</p>
			<p>Finally, this research assessed the impact of purchase intentions and past experience of ecological products, that encourage the same behavior to be repeated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Khare &amp; Sadachar, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han, 2020</xref>), on the actual consumption of sustainable fashion. Intention was established as being the most important variable for someone to act on a behavior (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Klöckner, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Li et al., 2018</xref>), and it was observed in this study that this variable was, in fact, the most significant in relation to the behavior, sustainable purchasing.</p>
			<p>However, although the variables that were analyzed to investigate the direct impact on sustainable fashion consumption (previous purchase behavior and purchase intention) have been supported statistically and can be considered as determinants for this type of consumption when verifying the coefficient of determination (17.7%), it is argued that the intention and previous purchase behavior should not be seen as the only explanatory factors for the actual consumption of sustainable fashion, which can be addressed in future research.</p>
			<p>This study also investigated the moderation of demographic variables on the relationship between purchase intention and actual consumption of sustainable fashion. Although the gender variable moderated the proposed relationship, there was no significant difference between people of different genders. On the other hand, the indices obtained indicated that the relationship between purchase intention and actual consumption of sustainable fashion was more significant in the group of young consumers. This finding is in line with previous research that found that young people are more receptive to eco-fashion ideals and products (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baier et al., 2020</xref>).</p>
			<p>The conclusion of the study is presented below.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>6. Final Conclusions</title>
			<p>On the basis that pro-environmental behavior as an essential factor to create effective sustainable environments, this study aimed to verify the determinants that influence the behavior of sustainable fashion consumers. The fashion industry has drawn attention because it is a sector that has many unsustainability problems, both in its production processes as well as in consumption and social issues related to labor.</p>
			<p> Therefore, in order to answer the arguments of <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi et al. (2020</xref>), this study used TPB to identify the psychological, social, and demographic factors that influence the behavior of real consumers of sustainable fashion from a population that has not been investigated significantly before and where fashion has a strong impact on its culture, in other words, Brazilian consumers.</p>
			<p>Based on the findings of the field research, it can be said that the Brazilians in the survey, who consume sustainable fashion, are aware of the social and environmental impact of fashion, they think about their purchasing activity in moral terms, they have a favorable attitude and intention towards sustainable consumption of fashion, they are not equally affected by social pressure, and they take account of precious experiences when deciding about purchasing sustainable fashion items.</p>
			<p>On a managerial level, when verifying whether the choice for sustainable fashion products is more related to individual factors and the environmental impact caused by consumption, than the influence and pressure from third parties, it seems pertinent for marketers s to promote ethical factors and the social impact inherent in sustainable fashion products as part of their strategy, so that consumers can appreciate what consuming that item will contribute to the environment, society and for them, the consumer.</p>
			<p>As an example of a possible strategy, sustainable fashion retailers could use different means of communication, such as online social networks and specialized experience exchange websites, among others, to display campaigns to make consumers aware of the environmental and social issues resulting from unsustainable consumption and promote messages to encourage individuals to be more socially responsible.</p>
			<p>The dissemination of information about the benefits of sustainable fashion products would aim to make consumers aware that they can have a positive impact by choosing sustainable products instead of more polluting, conventional ones. In other words, companies should rely on informative environmental education programs that focus on informing the general public about what sustainable fashion is and the causes related to this industry, as well as explaining about how these items are produced and the importance of policies such as reverse logistics, using organic raw materials, lengthening the product’s life cycle, etc. Strategies like this can have an influence and establish more environmentally- conscious attitudes, intentions, and actual buying behavior.</p>
			<sec>
				<title>6.1. Research limitations and future studies</title>
				<p>Although the study contributes specifically to the understanding of consumer behavior in relation to sustainable fashion, it has some limitations. Firstly, the size of the sample may be considered small, which prevents the results from being generalized. Future research could expand this study in terms of demography and to compare similar contexts and cultures. In addition, the predictive capacity of the model could be improved by adding other relevant constructs. A suggestion for future analyses is the impact of factors such as individual values ​​and consumer personality traits. It should also be taken into account that the behavior of sustainable fashion consumption was based on the behavior reported by the respondents, as the research was designed as a survey. Future studies could encompass the effective choice of the consumer for a sustainable fashion item, by using experiments, for example.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior.<italic>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</italic>,<italic>50</italic>(2), 179-211. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T">https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ajzen</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>The theory of planned behavior</article-title>
					<source>Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes</source>
					<volume>50</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>179</fpage>
					<lpage>211</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T">https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Armstrong, C. M., Niinimäki, K., Kujala, S., Karell, E., &amp; Lang, S. (2015). Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: Exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland.<italic>Journal of Cleaner Production</italic>,<italic>97</italic>, 30-39. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Armstrong</surname>
							<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Niinimäki</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kujala</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Karell</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lang</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Sustainable product-service systems for clothing: Exploring consumer perceptions of consumption alternatives in Finland</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source>
					<volume>97</volume>
					<fpage>30</fpage>
					<lpage>39</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.046</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Baier, D., Rausch, T. M., &amp; Wagner, T. F. (2020). The drivers of sustainable apparel and sportswear consumption: A segmented kano perspective.<italic>Sustainability</italic>,<italic>12</italic>(7), 2788. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072788">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072788</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Baier</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rausch</surname>
							<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wagner</surname>
							<given-names>T. F</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>The drivers of sustainable apparel and sportswear consumption: A segmented kano perspective</article-title>
					<source>Sustainability</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<issue>7</issue>
					<elocation-id>2788</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072788">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072788</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Beck, L., &amp; Ajzen, I. (1991). Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior.<italic>Journal of Research in Ppersonality</italic>,<italic>25</italic>(3), 285-301. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H">https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Beck</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ajzen</surname>
							<given-names>I</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1991</year>
					<article-title>Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Research in Ppersonality</source>
					<volume>25</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>285</fpage>
					<lpage>301</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H">https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Bhutto, M. Y., Liu, X., Soomro, Y. A., Ertz, M., &amp; Baeshen, Y. (2021). Adoption of energy-efficient home appliances: Extending the theory of planned behavior.<italic>Sustainability</italic>,<italic>13</italic>(1), 250. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010250">https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010250</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bhutto</surname>
							<given-names>M. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Soomro</surname>
							<given-names>Y. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ertz</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Baeshen</surname>
							<given-names>Y</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Adoption of energy-efficient home appliances: Extending the theory of planned behavior</article-title>
					<source>Sustainability</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<elocation-id>250</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010250">https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010250</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Bloodhart, B., &amp; Swim, J. K. (2020). Sustainability and consumption: what's gender got to do with it?. <italic>Journal of Social Issues</italic>, <italic>76</italic>(1), 101-113. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12370">https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12370</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bloodhart</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Swim</surname>
							<given-names>J. K</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Sustainability and consumption: what's gender got to do with it?</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Social Issues</source>
					<volume>76</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>101</fpage>
					<lpage>113</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12370">https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12370</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Bong Ko, S., &amp; Jin, B. (2017). Predictors of purchase intention toward green apparel products. <italic>Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal</italic>, <italic>21</italic>(1), 70-87. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2014-0057">https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2014-0057</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bong Ko</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jin</surname>
							<given-names>B</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Predictors of purchase intention toward green apparel products</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal</source>
					<volume>21</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>70</fpage>
					<lpage>87</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2014-0057">https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-07-2014-0057</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Boreki, V. (2021, June 07). Consumo responsável ainda engatinha no Brasil. <italic>Gazeta do Povo</italic> - <italic>Especial Você mais sustentável</italic>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/gpbc/voce-mais-sustentavel/consumo-responsavel-ainda-engatinha-no-brasil/">https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/gpbc/voce-mais-sustentavel/consumo-responsavel-ainda-engatinha-no-brasil/</ext-link>. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="newspaper">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Boreki</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Consumo responsável ainda engatinha no Brasil</article-title>
					<source>Gazeta do Povo - Especial Você mais sustentável</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/gpbc/voce-mais-sustentavel/consumo-responsavel-ainda-engatinha-no-brasil/">https://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/gpbc/voce-mais-sustentavel/consumo-responsavel-ainda-engatinha-no-brasil/</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Brasil. (2013). Lei nº 12.852, de 5 de agosto de 2013. Institui o Estatuto da Juventude e dispõe sobre os direitos dos jovens, os princípios e diretrizes das políticas públicas de juventude e o Sistema Nacional de Juventude.<italic>Diário Oficial da União</italic>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12852.htm#:~:text=LEI%20N%C2%BA%2012.852%2C%20DE%205%20DE%20AGOSTO%20DE%202013.&amp;text=Institui%20o%20Estatuto%20da%20Juventude,Sistema%20Nacional%20de%20Juventude%20%2D%20SINAJUVE">http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12852.htm#:~:text=LEI%20N%C2%BA%2012.852%2C%20DE%205%20DE%20AGOSTO%20DE%202013.&amp;text=Institui%20o%20Estatuto%20da%20Juventude,Sistema%20Nacional%20de%20Juventude%20%2D%20SINAJUVE</ext-link>.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="legal-doc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Brasil</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Lei nº 12.852, de 5 de agosto de 2013</article-title>
					<comment>Institui o Estatuto da Juventude e dispõe sobre os direitos dos jovens, os princípios e diretrizes das políticas públicas de juventude e o Sistema Nacional de Juventude</comment>
					<source>Diário Oficial da União</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12852.htm#:~:text=LEI%20N%C2%BA%2012.852%2C%20DE%205%20DE%20AGOSTO%20DE%202013.&amp;text=Institui%20o%20Estatuto%20da%20Juventude,Sistema%20Nacional%20de%20Juventude%20%2D%20SINAJUVE">http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2013/lei/l12852.htm#:~:text=LEI%20N%C2%BA%2012.852%2C%20DE%205%20DE%20AGOSTO%20DE%202013.&amp;text=Institui%20o%20Estatuto%20da%20Juventude,Sistema%20Nacional%20de%20Juventude%20%2D%20SINAJUVE</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Chen, M. F. (2020). The impacts of perceived moral obligation and sustainability self‐identity on sustainability development: A theory of planned behavior purchase intention model of sustainability‐labeled coffee and the moderating effect of climate change skepticism.<italic>Business Strategy and the Environment</italic>, <italic>29</italic>(6), 2404-2417. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2510">https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2510</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>M. F</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>The impacts of perceived moral obligation and sustainability self‐identity on sustainability development: A theory of planned behavior purchase intention model of sustainability‐labeled coffee and the moderating effect of climate change skepticism</article-title>
					<source>Business Strategy and the Environment</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>2404</fpage>
					<lpage>2417</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2510">https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2510</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Chen, S. C., &amp; Hung, C. W. (2016). Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior. <italic>Technological Forecasting and Social Change</italic>, 112, 155-163.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>S. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hung</surname>
							<given-names>C. W</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Elucidating the factors influencing the acceptance of green products: An extension of theory of planned behavior</article-title>
					<source>Technological Forecasting and Social Change</source>
					<volume>112</volume>
					<fpage>155</fpage>
					<lpage>163</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Ciasullo, M. V., Maione, G., Torre, C., &amp; Troisi, O. (2017). What about sustainability? An empirical analysis of consumers' purchasing behavior in fashion context.<italic>Sustainability</italic>, 9(9), 1617. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091617">https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091617</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ciasullo</surname>
							<given-names>M. V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Maione</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Torre</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Troisi</surname>
							<given-names>O</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>What about sustainability? An empirical analysis of consumers' purchasing behavior in fashion context</article-title>
					<source>Sustainability</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<issue>9</issue>
					<elocation-id>1617</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091617">https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091617</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Fischer, D., Böhme, T., &amp; Geiger, S. M. (2017). Measuring young consumers' sustainable consumption behavior: Development and validation of the YCSCB scale.<italic>Young Consumers</italic>, <italic>18</italic>(3), 312-326. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2017-00671">https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2017-00671</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fischer</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Böhme</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Geiger</surname>
							<given-names>S. M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Measuring young consumers' sustainable consumption behavior: Development and validation of the YCSCB scale</article-title>
					<source>Young Consumers</source>
					<volume>18</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>312</fpage>
					<lpage>326</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2017-00671">https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-03-2017-00671</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Fleșeriu, C., Cosma, S. A., &amp; Bocăneț, V. (2020). Values and planned behaviour of the romanian organic food consumer.<italic>Sustainability</italic>,<italic>12</italic>(5), 1722. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051722">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051722</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fleșeriu</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cosma</surname>
							<given-names>S. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bocăneț</surname>
							<given-names>V</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Values and planned behaviour of the romanian organic food consumer</article-title>
					<source>Sustainability</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<elocation-id>1722</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051722">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051722</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Hair, J. F., Jr., Celsi, M. W., Ortinau, D. J., &amp; Bush, R. P. (2014).<italic>Fundamentos de pesquisa de marketing-3</italic>. AMGH Editora.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hair</surname>
							<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Celsi</surname>
							<given-names>M. W</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ortinau</surname>
							<given-names>D. J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bush</surname>
							<given-names>R. P</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<source>Fundamentos de pesquisa de marketing-3</source>
					<publisher-name>AMGH Editora</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Hair, J. F., Jr., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., &amp; Tatham, R. L. (2009).<italic>Análise multivariada de dados</italic>. Bookman Editora.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hair</surname>
							<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Black</surname>
							<given-names>W. C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Babin</surname>
							<given-names>B. J</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Anderson</surname>
							<given-names>R. E</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tatham</surname>
							<given-names>R. L</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2009</year>
					<source>Análise multivariada de dados</source>
					<publisher-name>Bookman Editora</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Hair, J. F., Jr., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., &amp; Sarstedt, M. (2016).<italic>A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)</italic>. Sage Publications.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hair</surname>
							<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
							<suffix>Jr.</suffix>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hult</surname>
							<given-names>G. T. M</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ringle</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sarstedt</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM)</source>
					<publisher-name>Sage Publications</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., &amp; Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM.<italic>European Business Review</italic>, <italic>31</italic>(1), 2-24. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203">https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hair</surname>
							<given-names>J. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Risher</surname>
							<given-names>J. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sarstedt</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ringle</surname>
							<given-names>C. M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM</article-title>
					<source>European Business Review</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>2</fpage>
					<lpage>24</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203">https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Han, H. (2020). Theory of green purchase behavior (TGPB): A new theory for sustainable consumption of green hotel and green restaurant products.<italic>Business Strategy and the Environment</italic>,<italic>29</italic>(6), 2815-2828. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2545">https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2545</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Han</surname>
							<given-names>H</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Theory of green purchase behavior (TGPB): A new theory for sustainable consumption of green hotel and green restaurant products</article-title>
					<source>Business Strategy and the Environment</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>2815</fpage>
					<lpage>2828</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2545">https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2545</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Han, T. I., &amp; Stoel, L. (2017). Explaining socially responsible consumer behavior: A meta-analytic review of theory of planned behavior.<italic>Journal of International Consumer Marketing</italic>,<italic>29</italic>(2), 91-103. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1251870">https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1251870</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Han</surname>
							<given-names>T. I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Stoel</surname>
							<given-names>L</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Explaining socially responsible consumer behavior: A meta-analytic review of theory of planned behavior</article-title>
					<source>Journal of International Consumer Marketing</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>91</fpage>
					<lpage>103</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1251870">https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2016.1251870</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Hu, L. T., &amp; Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives.<italic>Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal</italic>, 6(1), 1-55. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118">https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hu</surname>
							<given-names>L. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bentler</surname>
							<given-names>P. M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives</article-title>
					<source>Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal</source>
					<volume>6</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>55</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118">https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Hwang, C. G., Lee, Y. A., &amp; Diddi, S. (2015). Generation Y's moral obligation and purchase intentions for organic, fair-trade, and recycled apparel products.<italic>International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education</italic>, 8(2), 97-107. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.996917">https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.996917</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hwang</surname>
							<given-names>C. G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>Y. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Diddi</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Generation Y's moral obligation and purchase intentions for organic, fair-trade, and recycled apparel products</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>97</fpage>
					<lpage>107</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.996917">https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.996917</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Jacobs, K., Petersen, L., Hörisch, J., &amp; Battenfeld, D. (2018). Green thinking but thoughtless buying? An empirical extension of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy in sustainable clothing.<italic>Journal of Cleaner Production</italic>,<italic>203</italic>, 1155-1169. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Jacobs</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Petersen</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hörisch</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Battenfeld</surname>
							<given-names>D</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Green thinking but thoughtless buying? An empirical extension of the value-attitude-behaviour hierarchy in sustainable clothing</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source>
					<volume>203</volume>
					<fpage>1155</fpage>
					<lpage>1169</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.320</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Joergens, C. (2006). Ethical fashion: myth or future trend?.<italic>Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal</italic>, <italic>10</italic>(3), 360-371. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020610679321">https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020610679321</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Joergens</surname>
							<given-names>C</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Ethical fashion: myth or future trend?</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>360</fpage>
					<lpage>371</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020610679321">https://doi.org/10.1108/13612020610679321</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Khare, A., &amp; Sadachar, A. (2017). Green apparel buying behaviour: A study on Indian youth.<italic>International Journal of Consumer Studies</italic>,<italic>41</italic>(5), 558-569. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12367">https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12367</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Khare</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sadachar</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Green apparel buying behaviour: A study on Indian youth</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Consumer Studies</source>
					<volume>41</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<fpage>558</fpage>
					<lpage>569</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12367">https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12367</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Klöckner, C. A. (2013). A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour - A meta-analysis.<italic>Global Environmental Change</italic>,<italic>23</italic>(5), 1028-1038. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Klöckner</surname>
							<given-names>C. A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>A comprehensive model of the psychology of environmental behaviour - A meta-analysis</article-title>
					<source>Global Environmental Change</source>
					<volume>23</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<fpage>1028</fpage>
					<lpage>1038</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.05.014</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Lang, C., &amp; Armstrong, C. M. J. (2018). Fashion leadership and intention toward clothing product-service retail models.<italic>Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal</italic>, <italic>22</italic>(4), 571-587. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-12-2017-0142">https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-12-2017-0142</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lang</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Armstrong</surname>
							<given-names>C. M. J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Fashion leadership and intention toward clothing product-service retail models</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal</source>
					<volume>22</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>571</fpage>
					<lpage>587</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-12-2017-0142">https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-12-2017-0142</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Laroche, M., Toffoli, R., Kim, C., &amp; Muller, T. E. (1996). The influence of culture on pro-environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: A Canadian perspective.<italic>ACR North American Advances</italic>, 23, 196-202.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Laroche</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Toffoli</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Muller</surname>
							<given-names>T. E</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>The influence of culture on pro-environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: A Canadian perspective</article-title>
					<source>ACR North American Advances</source>
					<volume>23</volume>
					<fpage>196</fpage>
					<lpage>202</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Li, J., Zuo, J., Cai, H., &amp; Zillante, G. (2018). Construction waste reduction behavior of contractor employees: An extended theory of planned behavior model approach.<italic>Journal of Cleaner Production</italic>,<italic>172</italic>, 1399-1408. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.138">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.138</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zuo</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cai</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zillante</surname>
							<given-names>G</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Construction waste reduction behavior of contractor employees: An extended theory of planned behavior model approach</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source>
					<volume>172</volume>
					<fpage>1399</fpage>
					<lpage>1408</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.138">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.138</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Lundblad, L., &amp; Davies, I. A. (2016). The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption.<italic>Journal of Consumer Behaviour</italic>,<italic>15</italic>(2), 149-162. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1559">https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1559</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Lundblad</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Davies</surname>
							<given-names>I. A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>The values and motivations behind sustainable fashion consumption</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Consumer Behaviour</source>
					<volume>15</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>149</fpage>
					<lpage>162</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1559">https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1559</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Mohiuddin, M., Mamun, A. A., Syed, F. A., Masud, M. M., &amp; Su, Z. (2018). Environmental knowledge, awareness, and business school students' intentions to purchase green vehicles in emerging countries.<italic>Sustainability</italic>,<italic>10</italic>(5), 1534. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051534">https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051534</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mohiuddin</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Mamun</surname>
							<given-names>A. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Syed</surname>
							<given-names>F. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Masud</surname>
							<given-names>M. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Su</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Environmental knowledge, awareness, and business school students' intentions to purchase green vehicles in emerging countries</article-title>
					<source>Sustainability</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<elocation-id>1534</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051534">https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051534</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Moon, K. K. L., Lai, C. S. Y., Lam, E. Y. N., &amp; Chang, J. M. (2015). Popularization of sustainable fashion: Barriers and solutions.<italic>The Journal of the Textile Institute</italic>,<italic>106</italic>(9), 939-952. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2014.955293">https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2014.955293</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Moon</surname>
							<given-names>K. K. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lai</surname>
							<given-names>C. S. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lam</surname>
							<given-names>E. Y. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chang</surname>
							<given-names>J. M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Popularization of sustainable fashion: Barriers and solutions</article-title>
					<source>The Journal of the Textile Institute</source>
					<volume>106</volume>
					<issue>9</issue>
					<fpage>939</fpage>
					<lpage>952</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2014.955293">https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2014.955293</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Mukendi, A., Davies, I., Glozer, S., &amp; McDonagh, P. (2020). Sustainable fashion: Current and future research directions.<italic>European Journal of Marketing</italic>, <italic>54</italic>(11), 2873-2909. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0132">https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0132</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mukendi</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Davies</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Glozer</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>McDonagh</surname>
							<given-names>P</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Sustainable fashion: Current and future research directions</article-title>
					<source>European Journal of Marketing</source>
					<volume>54</volume>
					<issue>11</issue>
					<fpage>2873</fpage>
					<lpage>2909</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0132">https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-02-2019-0132</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>Paul, J., Modi, A., &amp; Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action.<italic>Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services</italic>,<italic>29</italic>, 123-134. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Paul</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Modi</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Patel</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<fpage>123</fpage>
					<lpage>134</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Rahman, O., Fung, B., &amp; Chen, Z. (2020). Young Chinese consumers’ choice between product-related and sustainable cues-The Effects of Gender Differences and Consumer Innovativeness. <italic>Sustainability</italic>, <italic>12</italic>(9), 3818. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093818">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093818</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rahman</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fung</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chen</surname>
							<given-names>Z</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Young Chinese consumers’ choice between product-related and sustainable cues-The Effects of Gender Differences and Consumer Innovativeness</article-title>
					<source>Sustainability</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<issue>9</issue>
					<elocation-id>3818</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093818">https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093818</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>Rausch, T. M., &amp; Kopplin, C. S. (2021). Bridge the gap: Consumers' purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing.<italic>Journal of Cleaner Production</italic>,<italic>278</italic>, 123882. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rausch</surname>
							<given-names>T. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kopplin</surname>
							<given-names>C. S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2021</year>
					<article-title>Bridge the gap: Consumers' purchase intention and behavior regarding sustainable clothing</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Cleaner Production</source>
					<volume>278</volume>
					<elocation-id>123882</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123882</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation>Razzaq, A., Ansari, N. Y., Razzaq, Z., &amp; Awan, H. M. (2018). The impact of fashion involvement and pro-environmental attitude on sustainable clothing consumption: The moderating role of Islamic religiosity.<italic>Sage Open</italic>, 8(2). <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018774611">https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018774611</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Razzaq</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ansari</surname>
							<given-names>N. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Razzaq</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Awan</surname>
							<given-names>H. M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>The impact of fashion involvement and pro-environmental attitude on sustainable clothing consumption: The moderating role of Islamic religiosity</article-title>
					<source>Sage Open</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018774611">https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018774611</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation>Rezvani, Z., Jansson, J., &amp; Bengtsson, M. (2018). Consumer motivations for sustainable consumption: The interaction of gain, normative and hedonic motivations on electric vehicle adoption.<italic>Business Strategy and the Environment</italic>,<italic>27</italic>(8), 1272-1283. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074">https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rezvani</surname>
							<given-names>Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jansson</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bengtsson</surname>
							<given-names>M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Consumer motivations for sustainable consumption: The interaction of gain, normative and hedonic motivations on electric vehicle adoption</article-title>
					<source>Business Strategy and the Environment</source>
					<volume>27</volume>
					<issue>8</issue>
					<fpage>1272</fpage>
					<lpage>1283</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074">https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2074</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation>Ru, X., Qin, H., &amp; Wang, S. (2019). Young people's behaviour intentions towards reducing PM2.5 in China: Extending the theory of planned behaviour.<italic>Resources, Conservation and Recycling</italic>,<italic>141</italic>, 99-108. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.019</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ru</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Qin</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>S</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Young people's behaviour intentions towards reducing PM2.5 in China: Extending the theory of planned behaviour</article-title>
					<source>Resources, Conservation and Recycling</source>
					<volume>141</volume>
					<fpage>99</fpage>
					<lpage>108</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.019">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.019</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation>Sarstedt, M., Henseler, J., &amp; Ringle, C. M. (2011). Multigroup analysis in Partial Least Squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results. <italic>Measurement and Research Methods in International Marketing</italic>, <italic>22</italic>, 195-218. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012">https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sarstedt</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Henseler</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ringle</surname>
							<given-names>C. M</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<article-title>Multigroup analysis in Partial Least Squares (PLS) path modeling: Alternative methods and empirical results</article-title>
					<source>Measurement and Research Methods in International Marketing</source>
					<volume>22</volume>
					<fpage>195</fpage>
					<lpage>218</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012">https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2011)0000022012</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B41">
				<mixed-citation>Scalco, A., Noventa, S., Sartori, R., &amp; Ceschi, A. (2017). Predicting organic food consumption: A meta-analytic structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior.<italic>Appetite</italic>,<italic>112</italic>, 235-248. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.007</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Scalco</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Noventa</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sartori</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ceschi</surname>
							<given-names>A</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Predicting organic food consumption: A meta-analytic structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior</article-title>
					<source>Appetite</source>
					<volume>112</volume>
					<fpage>235</fpage>
					<lpage>248</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.007">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.007</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B42">
				<mixed-citation>Sebrae (2015). <italic>Sustentabilidade - Relatório de Inteligência</italic>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br/chronus/ARQUIVOS_CHRONUS/bds/bds.nsf/d5e9da6b662a1a4dc2b91faa67978eb3/$File/5366.pdf">https://bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br/chronus/ARQUIVOS_CHRONUS/bds/bds.nsf/d5e9da6b662a1a4dc2b91faa67978eb3/$File/5366.pdf</ext-link>. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>Sebrae</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<source>Sustentabilidade - Relatório de Inteligência</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br/chronus/ARQUIVOS_CHRONUS/bds/bds.nsf/d5e9da6b662a1a4dc2b91faa67978eb3/$File/5366.pdf">https://bibliotecas.sebrae.com.br/chronus/ARQUIVOS_CHRONUS/bds/bds.nsf/d5e9da6b662a1a4dc2b91faa67978eb3/$File/5366.pdf</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B43">
				<mixed-citation>Si, H., Shi, J.-G., Tang, D., Wu, G., &amp; Lan, J. (2020). Understanding intention and behavior toward sustainable usage of bike sharing by extending the theory of planned behavior.<italic>Resources, Conservation and Recycling</italic>,<italic>152</italic>, 104513. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104513">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104513</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Si</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Shi</surname>
							<given-names>J.-G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tang</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lan</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Understanding intention and behavior toward sustainable usage of bike sharing by extending the theory of planned behavior</article-title>
					<source>Resources, Conservation and Recycling</source>
					<volume>152</volume>
					<elocation-id>104513</elocation-id>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104513">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104513</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B44">
				<mixed-citation>Ulanowicz, R. E. (2020). Quantifying sustainable balance in ecosystem configurations.<italic>Current Research in Environmental Sustainability</italic>, 1, 1-6. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2019.09.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2019.09.001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ulanowicz</surname>
							<given-names>R. E</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Quantifying sustainable balance in ecosystem configurations</article-title>
					<source>Current Research in Environmental Sustainability</source>
					<volume>1</volume>
					<fpage>1</fpage>
					<lpage>6</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2019.09.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2019.09.001</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B45">
				<mixed-citation>Wu, J., Font, X., &amp; Liu, J. (2020). Tourists' Pro-environmental behaviors: Moral obligation or disengagement?<italic>Journal of Travel Research</italic>, <italic>60</italic>(4), 735-748. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520910787">https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520910787</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wu</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Font</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2020</year>
					<article-title>Tourists' Pro-environmental behaviors: Moral obligation or disengagement?</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Travel Research</source>
					<volume>60</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>735</fpage>
					<lpage>748</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520910787">https://doi.org/10.1177/0047287520910787</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B46">
				<mixed-citation>Xiao, J. J. (2019). Developing Action-Taking Programs in Sustainable Consumption Education: Applying the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change (TTM). <italic>SSRN Electronic Journal</italic>. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335887">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335887</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xiao</surname>
							<given-names>J. J</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2019</year>
					<article-title>Developing Action-Taking Programs in Sustainable Consumption Education: Applying the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior Change (TTM)</article-title>
					<source>SSRN Electronic Journal</source>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335887">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3335887</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B47">
				<mixed-citation>Zheng, Y., &amp; Chi, T. (2015). Factors influencing purchase intention towards environmentally friendly apparel: An empirical study of US consumers.<italic>International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education</italic>, 8(2), 68-77. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.990059">https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.990059</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Zheng</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chi</surname>
							<given-names>T</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Factors influencing purchase intention towards environmentally friendly apparel: An empirical study of US consumers</article-title>
					<source>International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education</source>
					<volume>8</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>68</fpage>
					<lpage>77</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.990059">https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2014.990059</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
	<!--<sub-article article-type="translation" id="s1" xml:lang="pt">
		<front-stub>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15728/bbr.2022.19.5.4.pt</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Artigo</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Entendendo as intenções dos brasileiros de consumir moda sustentável</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0001-6859-4405</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Floriano</surname>
						<given-names>Mikaela Daiane Prestes</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff10"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-2538-9089</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Matos</surname>
						<given-names>Celso Augusto de</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff10"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<aff id="aff10">
					<label>1.</label>
					<institution content-type="original"> Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos. Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.</institution>
					<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos</institution>
					<addr-line>
						<city>Porto Alegre</city>
						<state>RS</state>
					</addr-line>
					<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
				</aff>
			</contrib-group>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c10">
					<email>mikaelapfloriano@gmail.com</email>
				</corresp>
				<corresp id="c20">
					<email>mailto:celsoam@unisinos.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="con" id="fn10">
					<label>CONTRIBUIÇÕES DE AUTORIA</label>
					<p> Os autores deste trabalho declaram que trabalharam de forma igual nas etapas de conceitualização, investigação, metodologia, administração do projeto, supervisão, validação, redação e edição do presente trabalho.</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn20">
					<label>CONFLITO DE INTERESSE</label>
					<p> Todos os autores deste trabalho declaram que não tem qualquer tipo de conflito de interesses em relação aos objetos por ele abordados.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<abstract>
				<title>RESUMO</title>
				<p>Este estudo verificou os determinantes que influenciam o comportamento de consumidores de moda sustentável, incorporando à Teoria do Comportamento Planejado os fatores: obrigação moral, consciência das consequências e o comportamento anterior de compra sustentável. Para isso, realizou-se uma <italic>survey</italic> com consumidores brasileiros de moda sustentável, e um total de 179 respostas foi analisado por meio da Modelagem de Equações Estruturais de Mínimos Quadrados Parciais (PLS-SEM). Os resultados indicaram que a obrigação moral e a consciência das consequências impactaram a atitude comportamental dos consumidores de moda sustentável. Outrossim, dos três componentes da TPB, apenas a atitude e o controle comportamental percebido influenciaram a intenção de compra. Finalmente, verificou-se que o consumo real de moda sustentável é explicado pela intenção e pelo comportamento de compra anterior, sendo que a variável idade moderou a relação entre intenção e o consumo de moda. Este estudo fornece aos profissionais de marketing informações abrangentes sobre os determinantes psicológicos, sociais, culturais e demográficos do comportamento de compra desses produtos.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="pt">
				<title>Palavras-chave:</title>
				<kwd>Obrigação Moral</kwd>
				<kwd>Consciência das Consequências</kwd>
				<kwd>Comportamento de Compra Anterior</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		</front-stub>
		<body>
			<sec sec-type="intro">
				<title>1. Introdução</title>
				<p>A moda sustentável surgiu como opção para solucionar questões ambientais decorrentes da indústria de transformação, que recebe críticas em razão de seus processos de produção e comercialização serem baseados no consumo contínuo, capaz de gerar severos impactos ambientais (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Armstrong <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>). Nesse sentido, a moda sustentável é conceituada como um termo amplo que incorpora princípios menos ofensivos para a sociedade e para o planeta, como condições de trabalho justas, reaproveitamento e produção de itens com materiais orgânicos e biodegradáveis que não prejudiquem o meio ambiente (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>).</p>
				<p>A popularização de produtos de moda pró-ambientais reflete o entendimento dos consumidores sobre as consequências de suas decisões de compra e do aumento de interesse em temáticas atinentes à sustentabilidade (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>), tornando essencial que a indústria se adapte às demandas de seus consumidores e passe a observar e minimizar as práticas prejudiciais ao meio ambiente. Contudo, nem toda consciência ecológica e a responsabilidade social refletem em intenções e comportamentos reais de compra de produtos de moda (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Jeorgens, 2006</xref>), isso ocorrendo, muitas vezes, como consequência do estilo de vida de grande parte dos países ocidentais, que não apresentam em suas culturas práticas altamente sustentáveis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Ulanowicz, 2020</xref>). </p>
				<p>Outrossim, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs <italic>et al</italic>. (2018</xref>) apontam que a demanda real dos consumidores por produtos ecológicos não é observada em consequência da falta de conhecimento das motivações que antecedem as escolhas sustentáveis dos indivíduos. Embora algumas investigações verifiquem como influenciadores das intenções de compra de moda sustentável aspectos como a variedade e o design dos produtos, grande parte dessas pesquisas são realizadas com amostras de acadêmicos ou painéis de respondentes, podendo não representar completamente o comportamento de compra real de moda sustentável (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>).</p>
				<p>Assim, tem-se que os determinantes psicológicos e sociais do consumo real de moda sustentável não foram bem compreendidos, encontrando-se incertezas sobre o que de fato caracteriza as intenções de compra desses produtos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). Dessarte, os autores destacam a carência de pesquisas as quais envolvam diferentes contextos e perfis, assim como a adaptação de teorias já utilizadas em investigações sobre o consumo de moda tradicional para a moda sustentável. Nesse sentido, este estudo busca através da Teoria do Comportamento Planejado (TPB) compreender o consumo de moda sustentável de consumidores brasileiros.</p>
				<p>A TPB se refere a um dos principais modelos utilizados para prever os elementos psicológicos que direcionam os consumidores a determinado consumo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Scalco <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>), tendo como premissa que a intenção de um indivíduo é dependente de uma estrutura composta pelas crenças nas vantagens e desvantagens de um comportamento, nas normas sociais para a efetivação de determinada conduta, e no controle comportamental durante a realização de certo comportamento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). </p>
				<p>Contudo, apesar de os componentes focais da TPB proporcionarem boas previsões sobre as intenções comportamentais dos indivíduos, alguns autores elencam a necessidade de inclusão de outras variáveis que possam melhorar a capacidade de explicação do modelo original, visto que a atitude, as normas subjetivas e o controle comportamental podem não representar completamente todos os determinantes teóricos de condutas ou intenções pró-ambientais (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>).</p>
				<p>Sobre isso, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han e Stoel (2017</xref>) e <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>) apontam que fatores como as obrigações morais e a consciência podem aumentar significativamente as atitudes e intenções de consumo socialmente responsável, sendo o mesmo verificado, especificamente, para a explicação de comportamentos pró-ambientais (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen, 2020</xref>) e produtos sustentáveis de alto envolvimento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Rezvani <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>). Além disso, verifica-se que consumidores com experiências positivas associadas ao consumo anterior de produtos ecológicos terão maior tendência em se envolver em novas decisões de compra de bens sustentáveis, fazendo isso como forma de alcançar benefícios parecidos aos já adquiridos na compra de produtos verdes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang &amp; Armstrong, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han, 2020</xref>). </p>
				<p>Nesse sentido, este estudo tem como objetivo verificar os determinantes que influenciam o comportamento de consumidores de moda sustentável, incorporando à Teoria do Comportamento Planejado os fatores: obrigação moral, consciência das consequências e o comportamento anterior de compra sustentável. A realização desta pesquisa se justifica ao investigar de maneira detalhada os consumidores de produtos de moda sustentável de uma população ainda pouco examinada, assim, satisfazendo as necessidades apontadas por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>) de análises que venham a considerar diferentes culturas e contextos para o aprofundamento de teorias acerca da moda sustentável. </p>
				<p>Ademais, a literatura sobre o comportamento de compra de itens de moda sustentável é esparsa e baseada em investigações exploratórias que, por vezes, desconsideram a análise conjunta das intenções e comportamentos reais de compra desses produtos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Rausch &amp; Kopplin, 2021</xref>). Portanto, ao oferecer uma visão abrangente sobre a formação da intenção e, posteriormente, do consumo real de compra, esta pesquisa poderá integrar descobertas anteriores que visam preencher a lacuna intenção-comportamento em relação ao consumo de moda sustentável.</p>
				<p>Embora se perceba o crescente interesse dos consumidores por itens de moda sustentável, evidenciam-se diferentes barreiras para a popularização desse tipo de produto, sendo um dos principais obstáculos para sua expansão o baixo grau de conhecimento dos consumidores e da própria indústria sobre o que de fato caracteriza a moda sustentável e os diferentes fatores comportamentais relacionados a esse segmento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">Moon <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>). Por conseguinte, ao considerar que esta pesquisa é realizada com aqueles indivíduos qualificados como reais consumidores de moda sustentável, espera-se obter informações como o perfil dessas pessoas, as motivações para esse consumo e os tipos de produtos que são priorizados e considerados por esses consumidores como moda sustentável. Considera-se que tais informações poderão contribuir gerencialmente ao gerar conhecimentos aplicáveis para a concepção de estratégias de marketing mais precisas, assertivas e, consequentemente, efetivas para o segmento de moda sustentável, visando não somente à melhoria das experiências dos consumidores ecológicos, mas também a expansão desse público.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2. Fundamentação Teórica</title>
				<sec>
					<title>2.1. Teoria do Comportamento Planejado e o Consumo Sustentável</title>
					<p>A Teoria do Comportamento Planejado (TPB) tem sido amplamente utilizada para a previsão das intenções comportamentais. De acordo com <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen (1991</xref>), a intenção se refere a um tipo de plano de ação consciente que demanda um comportamento específico e uma motivação para sua execução. Nesse sentido, a intenção tem sido aceita como melhor preditor do comportamento humano e, portanto, refere-se ao centro da TPB. Essa teoria pressupõe que os comportamentos específicos dos indivíduos ocorrem por suas intenções que são previstas por atitudes, normas subjetivas e controle comportamental, os quais juntos caracterizam os componentes focais independentes da TPB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). </p>
					<p>A atitude é compreendida como o grau em que uma pessoa tem uma avaliação favorável ou desfavorável de um determinado comportamento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>), estando diretamente associada às intenções comportamentais e relacionada aos comportamentos reais observados em diversos contextos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Scalco <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). O segundo determinante refere-se à motivação de uma pessoa em se envolver em um comportamento considerando as observações e expectativas de outros indivíduos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Klöckner, 2013</xref>), isto é, as normas subjetivas tratam-se da pressão social percebida para a realização do comportamento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). Finalmente, o controle comportamental diz respeito à percepção de simplicidade ou complexidade para a efetivação do comportamento, pressupondo também experiências passadas e potenciais dificuldades (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>).</p>
					<p>Por facilitar o entendimento de fatores psicológicos que orientam o comportamento dos indivíduos, nos últimos anos, a TPB tem sido empregada como alternativa para investigar a intenção dos consumidores em relação à aquisição de diversos tipos de produtos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>). Assim, essa teoria também é utilizada para a análise do consumo de produtos sustentáveis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Fleșeriu <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>), evidenciando-se que os três fatores da TPB podem ser considerados como efetivos preditores para explicar as lacunas existentes em relação à intenção e ao comportamento real de produtos ecológicos. Contudo, em algumas pesquisas, a TPB pode não ser totalmente satisfatória para a comprovação de condutas específicas, sendo essa teoria adequada somente para explicar comportamentos planejados e intencionais, não se aconselhando seu uso para analisar decisões habituais dos sujeitos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>).</p>
					<p>Nesse sentido, ao se compreender que a aquisição de produtos de moda é consequente de um controle volitivo, isto é, decorrente de um processo cognitivo em que o sujeito escolhe qual a periodicidade e qual a variedade de peças que irá comprar, a TPB se mostrou efetiva para a previsão de comportamentos específicos de consumo de moda sustentável (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bong Ko &amp; Jin, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>). Porém, quando comparadas às demais pesquisas sobre consumo de produtos ecológicos, as investigações que empregaram a TPB para elucidar a intenção de compra de moda sustentável podem ser observadas em menor quantidade, sobretudo, em relação ao consumo real desse tipo de produto. </p>
					<p>Somadas às características psicológicas dos indivíduos, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>) recomendam que outros fatores sejam considerados para verificar antecedentes da intenção de compra de moda sustentável, isso devendo ocorrer em razão de resultados conflitantes de outros estudos, os quais geram incertezas sobre quais características podem ser apontadas como determinantes para o consumo desses produtos. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lundblad e Davies (2016</xref>) apontam a importância de atributos relacionados às preocupações sociais e ambientais no consumo de artigos de moda, uma vez que informações sobre responsabilidade social e conscientização sobre práticas ecológicas resultam em maior conhecimento sobre as consequências ambientais das escolhas de consumo, gerando um senso de obrigação moral e consciência das consequências, resultantes em comportamentos mais sustentáveis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>).</p>
					<p>Outrossim, investigações anteriores sugerem que as experiências passadas dos indivíduos com produtos ecológicos, concernente ao desempenho ou frequência de envolvimento com atividades sustentáveis, podem estar relacionadas com decisões de compra pró-ambientais ao se caracterizarem como uma prática recorrente na vida dessas pessoas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Khare &amp; Sadachar, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang &amp; Armstrong, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han, 2020</xref>). Assim, propõe-se um modelo estendido da TPB, incluindo as variáveis obrigação moral, consciência das consequências e comportamento de compra anterior como antecedentes ao consumo de moda sustentável. Desta maneira, a seguir, o modelo teórico do estudo é apresentado.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>2.2. Desenvolvimento das hipóteses de estudo</title>
					<p>Diferentes fatores podem gerar motivações para o consumo de produtos sustentáveis, sendo reconhecido pela literatura o papel das obrigações morais e éticas para a atuação dos indivíduos em escolhas de consumo que possam reduzir o impacto ambiental (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lundblad &amp; Davies, 2016</xref>). A obrigação moral diz respeito à culpa ou ao orgulho do sujeito em participar de uma ação específica em um contexto moral (Beck &amp; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Ajzen, 1991</xref>), e, neste estudo, seguindo investigações anteriores como a de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>), a obrigação moral é estabelecida pelas normas e pressões morais percebidas pelos consumidores para a compra de determinado item.</p>
					<p>Os sentimentos de obrigação moral se mostram como essenciais para desenvolver intenções e comportamentos pró-ambientais, uma vez que as ações de cada indivíduos são diretamente dependentes de seus padrões morais (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wu <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). Assim, a obrigação moral pode servir como um mecanismo de autorregulação que determina as escolhas individuais dos consumidores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wu <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). Por conseguinte, ao considerar as preocupações ambientais, as predileções dos indivíduos podem ser motivadas pelo senso de obrigação ética e moral, culminando em crenças que minimizem futuros sentimentos de culpa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>). </p>
					<p>À vista disso, estudos anteriores incorporaram a obrigação moral à TPB a fim de aumentar o poder explicativo desse modelo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Chen, 2020</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). A partir desse entendimento, o estudo de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Bhutto <italic>et al.</italic> (2021</xref>), propôs avaliar empiricamente a associação entre a obrigação moral e as normas subjetivas, componente original da TPB, evidenciando que a moralidade não apresenta efeito significativo sobre as motivações para o consumo sustentável a partir das observações e expectativas de outrem. Indo de encontro à proposição dos autores, ao compreender a obrigação moral como uma norma pessoal intrínseca a cada sujeito e que as atitudes comportamentais se referem a avaliações particulares do indivíduo para a determinação de um comportamento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>), sugere-se que a obrigação moral está relacionada ao modelo original da TPB como um fator antecedente das atitudes comportamentais. Portanto, tem-se que:</p>
					<p>H<sub>1</sub> A obrigação moral tem um impacto positivo na atitude comportamental dos consumidores de moda sustentável.</p>
					<p>A conscientização do consumidor determina como este reflete sobre suas atitudes e seus comportamentos, sendo tal fator considerado como um dos determinantes associados às escolhas de consumo responsáveis e sustentáveis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). Isso ocorre à medida que o consumidor, ao ter consciência dos problemas ambientais gerados pelo consumo, desenvolve avaliações favoráveis para determinar um comportamento de compra de produtos verdes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Laroche <italic>et al</italic>., 1996</xref>). </p>
					<p>Essas proposições foram empiricamente testadas por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Razzaq <italic>et al</italic>. (2018</xref>), que verificaram a associação positiva entre a consciência das consequências e a intenção de compra de produtos de moda sustentável. Embora esse resultado tenha sido apurado, é possível averiguar lacunas teóricas sobre como a consciência das consequências influencia as decisões de compra dos sujeitos em relação a produtos sustentáveis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>) e como essa se relaciona ao modelo TPB. Assim, a fim de examinar o efeito da conscientização sobre o consumo ecológico, sugere-se que a consciência das consequências está positivamente relacionada às atitudes favoráveis ao consumo de produtos de moda sustentável. Portanto, propomos que:</p>
					<p>H<sub>2</sub> A consciência das consequências tem um impacto positivo na atitude comportamental dos consumidores de moda sustentável.</p>
					<p>A atitude caracteriza o grau em que o indivíduo avalia de maneira favorável ou negativa a realização de um comportamento específico. Nesse sentido, quanto maior o grau de uma atitude positiva, maior será a probabilidade de o indivíduo realizar o comportamento em questão (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). Uma atitude favorável em relação às preocupações ambientais e aos produtos ecológicos é apontada em estudos anteriores como influenciadora da intenção de compra sustentável (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chen &amp; Hung, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Paul <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ru <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Igualmente, observando-se tal relação no que concerne ao consumo de produtos de moda. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zheng &amp; Chi (2015</xref>) e <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs <italic>et al</italic>. (2018</xref>) sugerem que na medida em que o consumidor apresenta crenças favoráveis em relação aos produtos de moda sustentável, sua atitude comportamental exerce uma intenção de compra positiva. Dessa forma, ao compreender a predição da atitude na intenção de consumo, sugerimos que esse construto está associado a atitudes favoráveis ao consumo real de moda sustentável. Assim, tem-se que:</p>
					<p>H<sub>3</sub> A atitude comportamental tem um impacto positivo na intenção de compra de moda sustentável.</p>
					<p>Os grupos de referência são observados enquanto importantes agentes para as decisões de compra dos consumidores, gerando impacto significativo no desempenho do comportamento de um indivíduo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). Diante disso, as normas subjetivas têm se relacionado fortemente à intenção de compra de diferentes tipos de produtos ecológicos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ru <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>), associando-se também à compra de itens de vestuário (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Rahman <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>) sinalizam que os indivíduos tendem a ser mais influenciados por questões sociais atinentes ao consumo de moda ecológica do que propriamente pelos impactos ambientais causados por suas decisões de compra, atestando que os consumidores apresentam forte tendência de ter suas escolhas de consumo impactadas pela influência social (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Ciasullo <italic>et al</italic>., 2017</xref>). Assim, tendo em vista que o consumo não é apenas instigado por características intrínsecas ao indivíduo e buscando entender a influência de elementos sociais no comportamento dos consumidores de moda sustentável, sugere-se que:</p>
					<p>H<sub>4</sub> As normas subjetivas têm um impacto positivo na intenção de compra de moda sustentável.</p>
					<p> O controle comportamental percebido caracteriza o grau de facilidade ou de dificuldade que um indivíduo observa para a realização de um comportamento específico, considerando fatores como habilidade, confiança, tempo e dinheiro (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>). No contexto de produtos socialmente responsáveis, a variável controle percebido é apontada enquanto preditora da intenção de compra desses itens (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Paul <italic>et al</italic>., 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Mohiuddin <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>), não sendo observada por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang e Armstrong (2018</xref>) relação significativa entre o controle comportamental percebido e a adesão ao consumo e serviços relacionados a vestuários sustentáveis, indo de encontro a descobertas anteriores as quais verificaram associação entre o controle percebido e a moda ecológica (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Bong Ko &amp; Jin, 2017</xref>). Dessarte, verificando-se as convergências sobre o papel desse componente da TBP nas intenções de compra de moda sustentável, tem-se como hipótese:</p>
					<p>H<sub>5</sub> O controle comportamental percebido tem um impacto positivo na intenção de compra de moda sustentável.</p>
					<p>A intenção prevalece como a variável mais próxima para a realização de uma conduta, servindo também como fator integrativo entre os componentes da TPB e a efetivação de um comportamento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Klöckner, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Li <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>). A intenção de compra de produtos ecológicos tem gerado efeitos positivos no comportamento de compra sustentável (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). Em relação à moda, poucas investigações determinam a associação entre a intenção de compra e o consumo real de produtos de moda sustentável, existindo a carência de aprofundamento sobre como a literatura de moda existente, que está diretamente interligada aos conceitos da TPB e à intenção de compra (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>), pode ser aplicada ao consumo de mercadorias sustentáveis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). </p>
					<p>
						<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>) sinalizam que para a revisão e aplicação de fenômenos anteriores na construção de novas teorias de moda pró-ambientais, deve-se considerar fatores demográficos para entender quais aspectos pessoais precisam ser de fato abordados para incentivar a intenção e o consumo de moda sustentável, de modo que possam complementar os efeitos das características psicológicas enquanto previsoras das decisões de compra (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al.</italic>, 2020</xref>). As variáveis gênero e idade podem ser utilizadas como indicadores significativos da determinação das intenções de compra de itens de vestuário (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Rahman <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>) e produtos verdes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bloodhart &amp; Swim, 2020</xref>), em que indivíduos mais jovens e pertencentes ao sexo feminino são mais propensos a adquirir roupas e calçados produzidos através de comércio justo, materiais orgânicos e recicláveis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baier <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>).</p>
					<p>Nesse sentido, ao compreender a intenção como um construto determinante para a previsão de condutas ecológicas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Li <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>), é proposto que a intenção pró-ambiental em relação à moda será decisiva para a efetivação de comportamentos reais de compra desses produtos sustentáveis, reconhecendo-se também o papel de variáveis demográficas nessa equação. Portanto, sugere-se que:</p>
					<p>H<sub>6</sub> A intenção de compra sustentável tem um impacto positivo no consumo de moda sustentável.</p>
					<p>H<sub>7</sub> Os fatores demográficos (a) gênero e (b) idade têm um efeito moderador nas relações entre a intenção de compra e o comportamento de consumo de moda sustentável, sendo essa relação mais intensa entre indivíduos mais jovens e pertencentes ao gênero feminino.</p>
					<p>Embora se reconheça a intenção como um determinante significativo que influencia positivamente a ocorrência dos mais variados comportamentos, este estudo sugere que tal construto pode não ser o único motivador crítico para a realização do consumo real de moda sustentável. Isso porque consumidores que possuem experiências e percepções positivas acerca de produtos verdes poderão desenvolver novas intenções para continuar adquirindo bens sustentáveis como forma de realizar comportamentos que lhes garantam benefícios similares aos já adquiridos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang &amp; Armstrong, 2018</xref>). Por conseguinte, a partir do entendimento de que condutas repetidas podem configurar intenções e comportamentos contínuos e que experiências sustentáveis passadas tendem a prever novas compras ecológicas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Khare &amp; Sadachar, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han, 2020</xref>), propõe-se que juntamente a intenção de compra, o comportamento passado de compra relaciona-se diretamente com o consumo de moda sustentável, servindo como construto complementar à TPB. Assim, é proposto que:</p>
					<p>H<sub>8</sub> O comportamento de compra sustentável anterior tem um impacto positivo no consumo de moda sustentável.</p>
					<p>Na <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Figura 1</xref>, apresenta-se o modelo teórico estruturado para este estudo.</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f10">
							<label>Figura 1</label>
							<caption>
								<title><italic>Modelo teórico</italic></title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="1808-2386-bbr-19-05-525-gf10.jpg"/>
							<attrib><italic>Fonte</italic>: Autores (2021).</attrib>
						</fig>
					</p>
					<p>A seguir, tem-se a metodologia utilizada para análise das hipóteses.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="methods">
				<title>3. Metodologia</title>
				<p>Esta investigação se qualifica como uma pesquisa descritiva, com abordagem de cunho quantitativo, realizada a partir de um levantamento tipo <italic>survey</italic> (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2014</xref>). A população-alvo determinada para o estudo corresponde aos consumidores brasileiros de moda sustentável. O Brasil configura um dos maiores produtores têxteis do mundo, produzindo cerca de 9,8 bilhões de itens de vestuário e artigos para casa, sendo responsável pelo uso de grande quantidade de água e geração de resíduos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Sebrae, 2015</xref>). Logo, é pertinente a análise do comportamento de compra de moda sustentável dos brasileiros. Ao não se ter conhecimento e acesso ao parâmetro de consumidores desses produtos, foi adotada uma amostragem não probabilística por conveniência (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2014</xref>).</p>
				<p>A coleta das informações dos consumidores de moda sustentável ocorreu por intermédio de aplicação de questionário estruturado e autoadministrado. Inicialmente, a construção do instrumento de coleta ocorreu a partir da seleção das escalas que melhor permitem a mensuração dos fenômenos que se pretendia investigar. Nesse sentido, oito escalas validadas em pesquisas anteriores foram utilizadas. Esses instrumentos traduzem os construtos centrais do modelo teórico, e são detalhados na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t10">Tabela 1</xref>.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t10">
						<label>Tabela 1</label>
						<caption>
							<title><italic>Escalas utilizadas</italic></title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="center">Escala</th>
									<th align="center">Autor(es)</th>
									<th align="center">Itens</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Normas Subjetivas</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="4">Adaptado de BongKo e Jin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">2017</xref>) e <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>).</td>
									<td align="center">3</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Atitude</td>
									<td align="center">4</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Controle Comportamental Percebido</td>
									<td align="center">4</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Intenção de Compra</td>
									<td align="center">3</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Obrigação Moral</td>
									<td align="center">Adaptado de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Si <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>).</td>
									<td align="center">4</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Consciência das Consequências</td>
									<td align="center">Adaptado de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han (2020</xref>).</td>
									<td align="center">4</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Comportamento de Compra Anterior</td>
									<td align="center">Adaptado de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Lang &amp; Armstrong (2018</xref>) e <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han (2020</xref>).</td>
									<td align="center">2</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Consumo de Moda Sustentável</td>
									<td align="center">Adaptado de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Fischer <italic>et al</italic>. (2017</xref>).</td>
									<td align="center">4</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN7">
								<p><italic>Fonte</italic>: Autores (2021).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>Os instrumentos adotados foram traduzidos para a língua portuguesa e adaptados para atender ao objetivo deste estudo, sendo mensurados a partir de escala do tipo <italic>Likert</italic>de sete pontos, de modo que os respondentes pudessem demonstrar o grau de discordância e concordância a respeito das questões que lhes eram apresentadas (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2014</xref>). Ainda foram incluídas perguntas concernentes ao perfil sociodemográfico (gênero, idade, estado civil, escolaridade e renda) e questões sobre as atividades de consumo sustentável (2 itens), isto é, o tipo e as motivações para o consumo de moda sustentável.</p>
				<p>Seguindo as recomendações de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>) sobre a necessidade de aprimoramento de pesquisas com consumidores que de fato consomem itens de moda sustentável, este estudo busca investigar aqueles indivíduos que podem ser considerados como consumidores reais desses produtos. Nesta pesquisa, considera-se como um consumidor real aquele indivíduo que adquire produtos de moda sustentável há pelo menos um ano, conforme orientações de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Xiao (2019</xref>) em relação ao período em que se pode considerar um comportamento como sustentável. Assim, como critério para determinar a constituição de uma amostra adequada, foi incluída uma questão filtro para identificar se os respondentes faziam ou não parte da população-alvo, indagando no início do questionário quanto à periodicidade das aquisições de itens de moda sustentável. Aqueles que responderam consumir produtos sustentáveis há mais de um ano foram convidados a prosseguir com a pesquisa.</p>
				<p>Para determinar o tamanho mínimo da amostra, considerando a falta de conhecimento e acesso ao parâmetro da população de consumidores de moda sustentável, utilizou-se o software G*Power. Para tanto, foram adotados os parâmetros propostos por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Hair <italic>et al</italic>. (2016</xref>): a) tamanho do efeito médio (f² = 0,15), b) poder estatístico 95%, c) nível de significância de 5% e número de preditores relacionados com o modelo adotado. O resultado revelado pelo software G*Power apontou que a amostra deveria ter, pelo menos, 138 consumidores de moda sustentável. Somando-se a isso, buscando garantir que o modelo proposto fosse executado de maneira confiável, adotou-se, ainda, a recomendação sugerida por Hair <italic>et al</italic>. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">2009</xref>), a qual prevê que para cada variável observada se deve obter a informação de, no mínimo, cinco respondentes. Logo, ao se verificarem os 28 itens do instrumento de coleta, determinou-se como tamanho mínimo uma amostra de 140 observações.</p>
				<p>Para garantir a correta estrutura conceitual, o questionário foi previamente testado por dois pesquisadores de Marketing e por vinte consumidores de produtos sustentáveis. Esse pré-teste teve como finalidade verificar os itens que constituem o questionário, de modo a avaliar aspectos como o conteúdo, formulação e escrita. Após a realização do pré-teste, foram feitas mudanças em quatro perguntas ambíguas, no <italic>layout</italic> e nas instruções para melhorar a qualidade do questionário. </p>
				<p>Após o pré-teste, o instrumento de pesquisa foi aplicado de maneira totalmente online, através de questionário eletrônico da plataforma <italic>Google Forms</italic>, compartilhado em grupos brasileiros de moda sustentável e consumo consciente na rede social Facebook. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>) apontam que as mídias sociais são os principais canais utilizados pelos consumidores para obterem informações sobre produtos sustentáveis, servindo também como meio para que varejistas de moda aumentem a intenção e atitudes positivas de compra de seus produtos ecológicos. A coleta dos dados ocorreu durante o mês de outubro de 2020.</p>
				<p>Para verificar o perfil dos respondentes e as informações acerca do consumo de moda sustentável, foi utilizada a técnica de estatística descritiva (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2014</xref>) através do software <italic>IBM SPSS 20.0</italic>. Para análise da estrutura proposta, foi utilizada a modelagem de equações estruturais por meio dos mínimos quadrados parciais (PLS). O PLS foi selecionado por se tratar de uma técnica de modelagem que se mostra a mais pertinente para estudos de construções complexas, como o comportamento do consumidor, de extensões teóricas e por sua capacidade de analisar com precisão amostras que apresentam tamanhos reduzidos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>).</p>
				<p>O método de análise pela abordagem PLS-SEM prevê etapas essenciais: especificação do modelo, avaliação do modelo de medição e análise do modelo estrutural (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Essas três fases são realizadas e explicadas na seção seguinte.Além disso, buscando avaliar se a relação entre a intenção de compra e consumo de moda sustentável se modifica em razão das características sociodemográficas da amostra (H<sub>7ab</sub>), testamos os efeitos do gênero e da faixa etária nas relações do modelo através da <italic>MultigroupAnalysis</italic> (PLS-MGA). Essa técnica diz respeito a um conjunto de diversos procedimentos desenvolvidos para a comparação de estimações entre dois ou mais grupos de dados (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Sarstedt <italic>et al</italic>., 2011</xref>). </p>
				<p>Empregou-se para a análise multigrupo as variáveis gênero e faixa etária como critérios de divisão da amostra em subamostras. O gênero foi categorizado tendo como base o sexo dos respondentes, sendo que indivíduos do sexo feminino assumiram o valor 1 e pessoas do sexo masculino o valor 2. Concernente à faixa etária, a idade dos indivíduos foi codificada tendo em vista aquelas pessoas consideradas como jovens, com idades até os 29 anos e a quem se atribuiu o valor 1, e aqueles com idades superiores a 30 anos, considerados adultos (não jovens) e que assumem o valor 2, e essa divisão ocorreu de acordo com a legislação brasileira, a qual determina como jovens as pessoas com idades entre 15 e 29 anos de idade (Brasil, 2013). O software <italic>SmartPLS V. 3.3</italic> foi adotado para a realização dessas análises. </p>
				<p>Os resultados obtidos na pesquisa de campo são discutidos na sequência.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="results">
				<title>4. Resultados</title>
				<p>A partir da pesquisa de campo, um total de 196 observações foi obtido. Após revisão, 16 respostas foram excluídas por não corresponderem ao perfil desejado para esta investigação ou por apresentarem dados faltantes. Assim, a amostra final do estudo utilizada para as análises foi composta por 179 respostas válidas.</p>
				<sec>
					<title>4.1. Características dos respondentes </title>
					<p>O perfil demográfico dos respondentes foi examinado a partir das variáveis: gênero, idade, estado civil, escolaridade e renda. Nesse sentido, é possível observar que mais da metade dos respondentes (55,3%) são consumidores do sexo feminino, com idade igual ou inferior aos 29 anos (55,9%), e a maioria dos participantes estavam solteiros no momento da pesquisa (65,6%). Em relação à escolaridade, 43% possuem como maior qualificação acadêmica o ensino superior. Concernente à renda mensal, a resposta mais frequente entre os respondentes foi de R$1.001,000 a R$3.000,00 (33,5%).</p>
					<p>Quanto ao tipo de consumo de moda sustentável, 70,90% da amostra efetua compras em brechó, uma vez que nesses lugares os consumidores dizem encontrar peças exclusivas e que representam melhor custo benefício ao unir uma filosofia ambiental mais consciente com preços justos. Ademais, o consumo de produtos reciclados e ressignificados (13,40%) também foi destacado pelos respondentes. </p>
					<p>No tocante às motivações para consumir moda sustentável, é possível verificar que os respondentes aderiram à compra de produtos ecológicos ao compreender que as suas atividades de consumo estavam contribuindo para o agravamento de problemas ambientais (55,29%) e sociais (29,61%). Esses achados evidenciam que os consumidores de moda sustentável percebem as consequências geradas pelas suas decisões de compra, ao mesmo tempo em que buscam benefícios pessoais inerentes ao consumo.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>4.2 Avaliação do modelo estrutural</title>
					<p>Inicialmente, averiguou-se o modelo básico de medição para verificar a confiabilidade e a validade das escalas que foram utilizadas. Primeiramente, as cargas fatoriais foram analisadas, indicando que o item “SFC4”, componente do construto Consumo de Moda Sustentável, teve carregamento inferior a 0,5, e, por isso, foi excluído da análise. Posteriormente, todos os construtos obtiveram carregamentos satisfatórios para a realização das demais avaliações. Os resultados observados para cada variável são expostos na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t20">Tabela 2</xref>.</p>
					<p>
						<table-wrap id="t20">
							<label>Tabela 2</label>
							<caption>
								<title><italic>Estatística descritiva e carregamento fatorial das variáveis</italic></title>
							</caption>
							<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
								<colgroup>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
								</colgroup>
								<thead>
									<tr>
										<th align="center">Variável</th>
										<th align="center">Carga Fatorial</th>
										<th align="center">Média</th>
										<th align="center">Desvio Padrão</th>
									</tr>
								</thead>
								<tbody>
                                    <tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>Obrigação Moral (Geral)</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center">6,018</td>
										<td align="center">0,978</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu acho que é meu dever consumir produtos de moda sustentável.</td>
										<td align="center">0,872</td>
										<td align="center">6,40</td>
										<td align="center">1,078</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu me sentiria culpado (a) se não consumisse produtos de moda sustentável.</td>
										<td align="center">0,716</td>
										<td align="center">5,03</td>
										<td align="center">1,692</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Consumir produtos de moda sustentável está de acordo com os meus princípios.</td>
										<td align="center">0,820</td>
										<td align="center">6,28</td>
										<td align="center">1,082</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu acho que todas as pessoas deveriam consumir produtos de moda sustentável.</td>
										<td align="center">0,732</td>
										<td align="center">6,36</td>
										<td align="center">1,130</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>Consciência das Consequências (Geral)</bold> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"><bold>6,702</bold></td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,535</bold></td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Consumir produtos de moda de uma forma insustentável contribuirá para o aumento de impactos ambientais como a emissão de gases poluentes.</td>
										<td align="center">0,647</td>
										<td align="center">6,79</td>
										<td align="center">0,537</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Consumir produtos de moda de uma forma insustentável contribuirá para o esgotamento de recursos naturais.</td>
										<td align="center">0,684</td>
										<td align="center">6,93</td>
										<td align="center">0,352</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Consumir produtos de moda de uma forma insustentável contribuirá para condições precárias de trabalho e má remuneração dos colaboradores desse setor.</td>
										<td align="center">0,786</td>
										<td align="center">6,70</td>
										<td align="center">0,762</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Consumir produtos de moda de uma forma insustentável causará impactos ambientais que terão consequências e efeitos em curto e longo prazo.</td>
										<td align="center">0,746</td>
										<td align="center">6,39</td>
										<td align="center">1,462</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>Atitude (Geral)</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"><bold>6,614</bold></td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,671</bold></td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Pra mim é aconselhável consumir produtos de moda sustentável.</td>
										<td align="center">0,780</td>
										<td align="center">6,68</td>
										<td align="center">0,745</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Pra mim é benéfico consumir produtos de moda sustentável.</td>
										<td align="center">0,884</td>
										<td align="center">6,68</td>
										<td align="center">0,769</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Pra mim é agradável consumir produtos de moda sustentável.</td>
										<td align="center">0,795</td>
										<td align="center">6,58</td>
										<td align="center">0,813</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Pra mim vale a pena consumir produtos de moda sustentável em vez de produtos convencionais para contribuir com a proteção ambiental.</td>
										<td align="center">0,811</td>
										<td align="center">6,52</td>
										<td align="center">0,950</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>Normas Subjetivas (Geral)</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"><bold>4,463</bold></td>
										<td align="center"><bold>1,375</bold></td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Pessoas que são importantes para mim, como família e amigos, acham que eu devo comprar produtos de vestuário sustentáveis.</td>
										<td align="center">0,802</td>
										<td align="center">4,02</td>
										<td align="center">1,679</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Pessoas que são importantes pra mim aprovam minhas compras de produtos de vestuário sustentáveis.</td>
										<td align="center">0,876</td>
										<td align="center">3,88</td>
										<td align="center">1,667</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Pessoas que são importantes pra mim querem que eu compre produtos de vestuário sustentáveis.</td>
										<td align="center">0,834</td>
										<td align="center">5,49</td>
										<td align="center">1,500</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>Controle Comportamental Percebido (Geral)</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"><bold>6,102</bold></td>
										<td align="center"><bold>1,025</bold></td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu acredito que tenho a capacidade de continuar a comprar produtos de vestuário sustentáveis.</td>
										<td align="center">0,855</td>
										<td align="center">6,22</td>
										<td align="center">1,029</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Se depender inteiramente de mim, tenho confiança de que eu sou capaz de continuar comprando produtos de vestuário sustentáveis.</td>
										<td align="center">0,933</td>
										<td align="center">6,25</td>
										<td align="center">1,125</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Tenho bastante confiança de que continuarei comprando produtos de vestuário sustentáveis.</td>
										<td align="center">0,916</td>
										<td align="center">6,27</td>
										<td align="center">1,154</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">A decisão de comprar ou não produtos de vestuário sustentáveis depende inteiramente de mim.</td>
										<td align="center">0,736</td>
										<td align="center">5,68</td>
										<td align="center">1,475</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>Comportamento de compra Anterior (Geral)</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"><bold>5,505</bold></td>
										<td align="center"><bold>1,171</bold></td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Muitas vezes tentei comprar produtos de moda sustentável que fossem menos prejudiciais ao meio ambiente.</td>
										<td align="center">0,882</td>
										<td align="center">5,21</td>
										<td align="center">1,398</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu frequentemente escolho o produto que menos contribui para a poluição, quando há uma escolha.</td>
										<td align="center">0,951</td>
										<td align="center">5,80</td>
										<td align="center">1,148</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>Intenção de Compra (Geral)</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"><bold>6,541</bold></td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,845</bold></td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu pretendo comprar produtos de vestuário sustentáveis em vez de produtos convencionais.</td>
										<td align="center">0,907</td>
										<td align="center">6,57</td>
										<td align="center">0,880</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu planejo comprar produtos de vestuário sustentáveis em vez de produtos convencionais.</td>
										<td align="center">0,890</td>
										<td align="center">6,42</td>
										<td align="center">1,054</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu quero comprar produtos de vestuário sustentáveis em vez de produtos convencionais.</td>
										<td align="center">0,913</td>
										<td align="center">6,63</td>
										<td align="center">0,873</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>Consumo de Moda Sustentável (Geral)</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"><bold>4,467</bold></td>
										<td align="center"><bold>1,309</bold></td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu escolho itens de roupas produzidas através de comércio justo, mesmo que sejam mais caras do que as roupas convencionais.</td>
										<td align="center">0,863</td>
										<td align="center">5,40</td>
										<td align="center">1,287</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu escolho roupas de produção orgânica (por exemplo, feitas de algodão orgânico).</td>
										<td align="center">0,837</td>
										<td align="center">4,08</td>
										<td align="center">1,711</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">Eu escolho itens de roupas com etiquetas que garantem a ausência de poluentes químicos.</td>
										<td align="center">0,826</td>
										<td align="center">3,91</td>
										<td align="center">1,637</td>
									</tr>
								</tbody>
							</table>
							<table-wrap-foot>
								<fn id="TFN8">
									<p><italic>Fonte</italic>: Autores com base nos dados da pesquisa (2021).</p>
								</fn>
							</table-wrap-foot>
						</table-wrap>
					</p>
					<p>A confiabilidade dos construtos foi verificada através dos valores do Alfa de <italic>Cronbach</italic> e da confiabilidade composta, sendo observado que para ambos os índices todos os construtos atingiram valores superiores ao mínimo recomendado (0,70), suportando a confiabilidade das escalas. A variância média extraída também foi averiguada, os índices obtidos foram satisfatórios, sendo que as oito variáveis latentes alcançaram valores superiores a 0,5. Esses resultados confirmam a validade convergente de todos os itens do modelo.</p>
					<p>A validade discriminante foi verificada a partir da análise do critério de Fornell-Larcker, em que a validade é determinada pelos valores da raiz quadrada da AVE de cada variável latente que deve ser superior à correlação com outros construtos do modelo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Os índices obtidos oferecem suporte à validade discriminante dos construtos (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t30">Tabela 3</xref>).</p>
					<p>
						<table-wrap id="t30">
							<label>Tabela 3</label>
							<caption>
								<title><italic>Modelo de medição</italic></title>
							</caption>
							<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
								<colgroup>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
								</colgroup>
                                <thead>
                                <tr>
										<th align="center"> </th>
										<th align="center">α</th>
										<th align="center">CR</th>
										<th align="center">AVE</th>
										<th align="center">1</th>
										<th align="center">2</th>
										<th align="center">3</th>
										<th align="center">4</th>
										<th align="center">5</th>
										<th align="center">6</th>
										<th align="center">7</th>
										<th align="center">8</th>
									</tr>
                                </thead>
								<tbody>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">1-MO</td>
										<td align="center">0,794</td>
										<td align="center">0,867</td>
										<td align="center">0,620</td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,788</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">2-AC</td>
										<td align="center">0,749</td>
										<td align="center">0,809</td>
										<td align="center">0,515</td>
										<td align="center">0,349</td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,718</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">3-AT</td>
										<td align="center">0,835</td>
										<td align="center">0,890</td>
										<td align="center">0,670</td>
										<td align="center">0,726</td>
										<td align="center">0,440</td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,818</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">4-SN</td>
										<td align="center">0,804</td>
										<td align="center">0,876</td>
										<td align="center">0,702</td>
										<td align="center">0,215</td>
										<td align="center">0,242</td>
										<td align="center">0,298</td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,838</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">5-PBC</td>
										<td align="center">0,884</td>
										<td align="center">0,921</td>
										<td align="center">0,746</td>
										<td align="center">0,580</td>
										<td align="center">0,265</td>
										<td align="center">0,665</td>
										<td align="center">0,248</td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,864</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">6-PI</td>
										<td align="center">0,888</td>
										<td align="center">0,930</td>
										<td align="center">0,816</td>
										<td align="center">0,567</td>
										<td align="center">0,405</td>
										<td align="center">0,715</td>
										<td align="center">0,298</td>
										<td align="center">0,650</td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,904</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">7-PBB</td>
										<td align="center">0,818</td>
										<td align="center">0,913</td>
										<td align="center">0,840</td>
										<td align="center">-0,020</td>
										<td align="center">-0,049</td>
										<td align="center">0,075</td>
										<td align="center">-0,043</td>
										<td align="center">0,166</td>
										<td align="center">0,123</td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,917</bold></td>
										<td align="center"> </td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left">8-SFC</td>
										<td align="center">0,799</td>
										<td align="center">0,880</td>
										<td align="center">0,710</td>
										<td align="center">0,334</td>
										<td align="center">0,203</td>
										<td align="center">0,413</td>
										<td align="center">0,272</td>
										<td align="center">0,585</td>
										<td align="center">0,399</td>
										<td align="center">0,181</td>
										<td align="center"><bold>0,842</bold></td>
									</tr>
								</tbody>
							</table>
							<table-wrap-foot>
								<fn id="TFN9">
									<p>Legenda. MO - Obrigação Moral; AC - Consciência das Consequências; AT - Atitude; SN - Normas Subjetivas; PBC - Controle Comportamental Percebido; PI - Intenção de Compra; PBB - Comportamento de Compra Anterior; SFC - Consumo de Moda Sustentável;</p>
								</fn>
								<fn id="TFN10">
									<p><italic>Fonte</italic>: Autores com base nos dados da pesquisa (2021).</p>
								</fn>
							</table-wrap-foot>
						</table-wrap>
					</p>
					<p>Para estimar o modelo de pesquisa, foi utilizado um procedimento de <italic>bootstrapping</italic> por meio de 5.000 repetições (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t40">Tabela 4</xref>). Para a avaliação da colinearidade, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair <italic>et al</italic>. (2019</xref>) propõem que os valores aceitáveis para os fatores de inflação de variância necessitam ser menores a 5. Neste estudo, os VIF internos apresentaram índices inferiores a 1,856, evidenciando que não há multicolinearidade no modelo. Além disso, outro pressuposto atendido concerne ao tamanho do efeito representado pelo indicador <italic>f</italic>², o qual </p>
					<p>demonstra o valor absoluto da contribuição individual (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Nesse sentido, foi possível constatar que todas as relações apresentaram efeitos no modelo. </p>
					<p>Analisando os índices obtidos para o <italic>t-</italic>valor, é possível determinar a significância das hipóteses propostas. Com um nível de significância de 5%, o coeficiente de caminho é considerado significativo se a estatística t for igual ou superior a 1,96. Assim, das hipóteses estabelecidas, seis relações foram estatisticamente significativas, enquanto a H<sub>4</sub> não apresentou suporte estatístico (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t40">Tabela 4</xref>). Observa-se que a relação entre obrigação moral e a atitude comportamental é positiva e significativa (β = 0,652;<italic>t</italic>-valor = 10,888;<italic>p</italic> = 0,000), fornecendo suporte para H<sub>1</sub>. Com igualdade, a H<sub>2</sub>, consciência das consequências sobre a atitude, obteve índices satisfatórios para garantir o suporte estatístico (β = 0,212;<italic>t</italic>-valor = 2,827;<italic>p</italic> = 0,005).</p>
					<p>A H<sub>3</sub>, que explica a relação entre a atitude e a intenção de compra, também foi suportada (β = 0,489;<italic>t</italic>-valor = 6,640;<italic>p</italic> = 0,000). Em contrariedade, a relação proposta entre as normas subjetivas e a intenção de compra de produtos de moda sustentável não foi significativa (β = 0,077;<italic>t</italic>-valor = 1,870;<italic>p</italic> = 0,060), portanto a H<sub>4</sub> não foi suportada. A H<sub>5</sub>, que propôs o impacto do controle comportamental sobre a intenção de compra de produtos de moda sustentável, igualmente apresentou significância estatística (β = 0,306;<italic>t</italic>-valor = 4,026;<italic>p</italic> = 0,000). Por sua vez, as hipóteses H<sub>6</sub> e H<sub>8</sub>, as quais verificaram o impacto da intenção de compra e do comportamento de compra anterior sobre o consumo de moda sustentável indicaram relações diretas e positivas (H<sub>6</sub> - β = 0,383;<italic>t</italic>-valor = 4,720;<italic>p</italic> = 0,000; H<sub>8</sub> - β = 0,134;<italic>t</italic>-valor = 1,970;<italic>p</italic> = 0,049), sendo que a intenção de compra apresentou a relação mais expressiva.</p>
					<p>
						<table-wrap id="t40">
							<label>Tabela 4</label>
							<caption>
								<title><italic>Resultado do modelo estrutural</italic></title>
							</caption>
							<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
								<colgroup>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
								</colgroup>
                                <thead>
                                <tr>
										<th align="center">Hipótese</th>
										<th align="center">VIF</th>
										<th align="center"><italic>f²</italic></th>
										<th align="center">Β</th>
										<th align="center"><italic>t-valor</italic></th>
										<th align="center"><italic>Sig</italic></th>
										<th align="center">R²</th>
										<th align="center">Decisão</th>
									</tr>
                                </thead>
								<tbody>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>1</sub> MO-> AT</bold></td>
										<td align="center">1,139</td>
										<td align="center">0,836</td>
										<td align="center">0,652</td>
										<td align="center">10,888</td>
										<td align="center">***</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">0,567</td>
										<td align="center">Suportada</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>2</sub> AC-> AT</bold></td>
										<td align="center">1,139</td>
										<td align="center">0,091</td>
										<td align="center">0,212</td>
										<td align="center">2,827</td>
										<td align="center">0,005</td>
										<td align="center">Suportada</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>3</sub> AT-> PI</bold></td>
										<td align="center">1,856</td>
										<td align="center">0,301</td>
										<td align="center">0,489</td>
										<td align="center">6,640</td>
										<td align="center">***</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="3">0,572</td>
										<td align="center">Suportada</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>4</sub> SN-> PI</bold></td>
										<td align="center">1,103</td>
										<td align="center">0,013</td>
										<td align="center">0,077</td>
										<td align="center">1,879</td>
										<td align="center">0,060</td>
										<td align="center">Não Suportada</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>5</sub> PBC-> PI</bold></td>
										<td align="center">1,802</td>
										<td align="center">0,121</td>
										<td align="center">0,306</td>
										<td align="center">4,026</td>
										<td align="center">***</td>
										<td align="center">Suportada</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>6</sub> PI-> SFC</bold></td>
										<td align="center">1,015</td>
										<td align="center">0,175</td>
										<td align="center">0,383</td>
										<td align="center">4,720</td>
										<td align="center">***</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">0,177</td>
										<td align="center">Suportada</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>8</sub> PBB-> SFC</bold></td>
										<td align="center">1,015</td>
										<td align="center">0,021</td>
										<td align="center">0,134</td>
										<td align="center">1,970</td>
										<td align="center">0,049</td>
										<td align="center">Suportada</td>
									</tr>
								</tbody>
							</table>
							<table-wrap-foot>
								<fn id="TFN11">
									<p><italic>Fonte</italic>: Autores com base nos dados da pesquisa (2021).</p>
								</fn>
							</table-wrap-foot>
						</table-wrap>
					</p>
					<p>Os resultados da investigação estrutural (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f20">Figura 2</xref>) indicam que o modelo proposto possui 56,7% de poder explicativo para a atitude. No que diz respeito aos coeficientes de caminho, tem-se que a obrigação moral apresentou a relação mais significativa (β = 0,836). Quando verificado o valor de R² obtido para a intenção de compra, constata-se que sua variação explicada pela atitude, normas subjetivas e controle comportamental foi de 57,2%, sendo que a atitude de compra manifestou a relação mais significativa (β = 0,301). Finalmente, foi possível observar que o modelo proposto possui 17,7% de poder explicativo para o consumo de moda sustentável, na qual a intenção de compra apresentou a associação mais expressiva com esse construto (β = 0,383).</p>
					<p>Os valores obtidos determinam que as variáveis dependentes Atitude e Intenção de Compra obtiveram grandes efeitos explicativos, enquanto o Consumo de Moda Sustentável obteve efeito médio. Além disso, empregou-se o valor de Q² de Stone Geisser para verificar a relevância preditiva do modelo (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>). Os resultados demonstram que o valor de Q² para Atitude, Intenção de Compra e Consumo de Moda Sustentável são, respectivamente, 0,365, 0,451 e 0,113. Considerando que esses valores estão acima de zero (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Hair <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>), evidencia-se que o modelo de pesquisa obteve relevância preditiva.</p>
					<p>A <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f20">Figura 2</xref> resume os resultados da avaliação do modelo estrutural.</p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f20">
							<label>Figura 2</label>
							<caption>
								<title><italic>Modelo estrutural</italic></title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="1808-2386-bbr-19-05-525-gf20.jpg"/>
							<attrib><italic>Fonte</italic>: Autores (2021).</attrib>
							<attrib>Nota: ** = &lt;0.05, *** = p&lt;0.001, n.s. = não significativo.</attrib>
						</fig>
					</p>
					<p>Por fim, analisou-se o RMSR padronizado, que se refere a um critério que representa a diferença entre a matriz de correlações observadas e a matriz subjacente ao modelo, servindo como uma medida de qualidade de ajuste a qual pode ser empregue para evitar erros de especificação. Assumindo o valor recomendado por <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Hu e Bentler (1999</xref>), o modelo deste estudo mostra um ajuste aceitável de 0,08.</p>
					<p>Apresentados os resultados do modelo estimado, a seguir, verifica-se o efeito das variáveis gênero e idade nas relações ora discutidas.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>4.3. Análise Multigrupo</title>
					<p>Uma Análise Multigrupo foi empregada para analisar se as relações entre os construtos intenção de compra e consumo de moda sustentável variam dependendo dos grupos das variáveis categóricas gênero e idade (H<sub>7ab</sub>). Para analisar esses grupos, adotou-se a abordagem PLS-MGA, que determina diferenças significativas entre os grupos quando apresentam índices abaixo de 0,05 ou acima de 0,95 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Sarstedt, Henseler &amp; Ringle, 2011</xref>), e os resultados são apresentados na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t50">Tabela 5</xref>.</p>
					<p>
						<table-wrap id="t50">
							<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
								<colgroup>
									<col/>
									<col span="2"/>
									<col span="2"/>
									<col span="2"/>
								</colgroup>
                                <thead>
                                <tr>
										<th align="left" rowspan="2">Relationship</th>
										<th align="center" colspan="2">Female </th>
										<th align="center" colspan="2">Male </th>
										<th align="center" colspan="2">PLS-MGA </th>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<th align="center">β</th>
										<th align="center">p-value</th>
										<th align="center">β</th>
										<th align="center">p-value</th>
										<th align="center">β (Female vs. Male)</th>
										<th align="center">p-value (Female vs. Male)</th>
									</tr>
                                </thead>
								<tbody>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>7a</sub> PI-> SFC</bold></td>
										<td align="center">0,375</td>
										<td align="center">0,001</td>
										<td align="center">0,420</td>
										<td align="center">0,002</td>
										<td align="center">-0,045</td>
										<td align="center">0,761</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left" rowspan="2"><bold>Relationship</bold></td>
										<td align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Young</bold></td>
										<td align="center" colspan="2"><bold>Not Young</bold> </td>
										<td align="center" colspan="2"><bold>PLS-MGA</bold> </td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">β</td>
										<td align="center">p-value </td>
										<td align="center">β </td>
										<td align="center">p-value</td>
										<td align="center">β (Young vs. Not Young)</td>
										<td align="center">p-value (Young vs. Not Young)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="left"><bold>H<sub>7b</sub> PI-> SFC</bold></td>
										<td align="center">0,399</td>
										<td align="center">0,000 </td>
										<td align="center">0,394 </td>
										<td align="center">0,001</td>
										<td align="center">0,005</td>
										<td align="center">0,963</td>
									</tr>
								</tbody>
							</table>
							<table-wrap-foot>
								<fn id="TFN12">
									<p><italic>Fonte</italic>: Autores com base nos dados da pesquisa (2021).</p>
								</fn>
							</table-wrap-foot>
						</table-wrap>
					</p>
					<p>Considerando os índices evidenciados, o grupo de respondentes do gênero feminino apresentou coeficiente de caminho significativo e positivo (β = 0,375, <italic>p</italic> =0,001). Esse resultado também foi verificado para os indivíduos do sexo masculino (β = 0,420, <italic>p</italic> =0,002). Contudo, os resultados do valor <italic>p</italic> de PLS-MGA demonstram não haver diferença significativa entre os dois grupos, indicando que a relação entre intenção de compra e o consumo real de moda sustentável não apresenta distinção quando considerado o gênero dos respondentes deste estudo. Logo, a H<sub>7a</sub> foi parcialmente suportada, uma vez que se verifica o impacto do gênero na relação proposta, porém não se observando, na amostra pesquisada, a diferença significativa entre os indivíduos de gêneros diferentes.</p>
					<p>Concernente à idade, tanto os indivíduos considerados como jovens (<italic>p</italic> = 0,000), com idades até 29 anos, como aqueles referentes ao grupo de não jovens (adultos) (<italic>p</italic> = 0,001), obtiveram coeficientes de caminho significativos. Observando-se o valor <italic>p</italic> de PLS-MGA, verifica-se a diferença significativa entre os grupos (<italic>p</italic> = 0,963 &gt; 0,95), indicando que a relação entre intenção de compra e consumo real de moda sustentável foi, neste estudo, mais intensa no grupo jovem do que no grupo de indivíduos com idade superior aos 29 anos (β = 0,399). Portanto, esses achados fornecem suporte para a H<sub>7b</sub>.</p>
					<p>Na sequência, os resultados encontrados são discutidos.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="discussion">
				<title>5. Discussões</title>
				<p>A partir da pesquisa de campo com indivíduos brasileiros que consomem produtos de moda sustentável há, pelo menos um ano, verificou-se que a atitude em relação ao consumo de moda sustentável foi influenciada pela obrigação moral e consciência das consequências. Esse resultado permite a inferência de que à medida que o indivíduo passa a considerar os impactos ambientais e sociais gerados pela sua forma de consumir e assume pressões morais para ações de compra menos prejudiciais, esse poderá adotar atitudes favoráveis ao comportamento de compra mais consciente (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Laroche <italic>et al</italic>., 1996</xref>).</p>
				<p>Logo, compreende-se que, na amostra investigada, a consciência das consequências ambientais negativas poderá atenuar atitudes insustentáveis, ocasionando maior disposição dos indivíduos em participar de atividades de consumo ecológicas, sendo que essa disposição está igualmente relacionada aos sentimentos de obrigação moral os quais autorregulam as ações dos indivíduos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Wu <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>). A obrigação moral e a conscientização ambiental se mostram como fatores pessoais que estimulam ações mais benéficas ao meio ambiente como forma de precaução aos futuros problemas e para a atenuação do sentimento de culpa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>). </p>
				<p>Diferentemente de estudos anteriores, nesta pesquisa, somente dois dos componentes do modelo original da TPB impactaram a intenção de compra de produtos de moda sustentável (i.e., atitude e controle comportamental percebido). Isso significa que a intenção de compra de moda sustentável é influenciada por crenças comportamentais favoráveis sobre esse tipo de produto, seja em relação às crenças de fatores intrínsecos aos indivíduos sobre a facilidade de realização de um comportamento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Ajzen, 1991</xref>), ou correspondente às crenças favoráveis à própria moda sustentável (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Zheng &amp; Chi, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Jacobs <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>). </p>
				<p>O presente estudo demonstrou que a pressão social não influencia diretamente a intenção de compra de consumidores reais de moda sustentável, indo de encontro a pesquisas anteriores que evidenciaram que as normas subjetivas determinam a intenção de compra de itens sustentáveis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han &amp; Stoel, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ru <italic>et al</italic>., 2019</xref>), e corroborando a investigação de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Rausch e Kopplin (2021</xref>) que não obteve suporte estatístico para evidenciar o impacto da norma subjetiva na intenção de compra de roupas sustentáveis. Analisando junto aos demais resultados, verifica-se que, para a amostra brasileira investigada, as escolhas de produtos de moda ecológica estão mais relacionadas aos fatores individuais e aos impactos ambientais causados pelo consumo do que em razão de influências e pressões de terceiros, sendo esse um fator que deve ser considerado durante a construção de estratégias de promoção desses produtos.</p>
				<p>Ao se verificar que as normas subjetivas não exercem efeitos significativos na intenção dos consumidores brasileiros de adquirir produtos de moda sustentável, este estudo propõe que tal resultado pode ser atribuído a dois diferentes motivos. Em primeiro lugar, embora a amostra investigada demonstre ter atitudes, intenções e comportamentos anteriores positivos no que concerne à moda sustentável, a carência de normas e valores coletivos no Brasil referentes ao consumo consciente pode esclarecer a falta de elementos sociais que estimulem cada vez mais o comportamento dos consumidores por itens sustentáveis. Esse argumento encontra respaldo em pesquisas realizadas com brasileiros, os quais demonstram que somente 24% dos consumidores podem ser caracterizados como ecologicamente conscientes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Boreki, 2021</xref>). Por conseguinte, acredita-se que a geração de uma consciência ambiental coletiva poderia enfatizar os desejos individuais dos consumidores em responder tal norma social e, assim, aumentar as intenções e as escolhas de produtos sustentáveis. Estando a realidade contrária a essa assertiva, considera-se que a falta de influência social nas intenções dos consumidores em adquirir moda sustentável pode ser reflexo da baixa demanda social percebida pelos brasileiros para o consumo sustentável.</p>
				<p>Somando-se a isso, outra justificativa para o resultado verificado pode estar atrelada ao significado de moda buscado pelos consumidores da amostra. As aquisições de produtos de moda são consideradas como um tipo de consumo intrinsecamente associado à identidade dos consumidores, encontrando-se relacionado ao suprimento de necessidades psicológicas, tais como o aumento da autoestima e autoexpressão (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lundblad &amp; Davies, 2016</xref>). De acordo com os autores, itens de moda sustentável podem se encontrar em oposição ao entendimento convencional de moda, garantindo aos consumidores maior senso de individualidade e conforto, sendo um dos objetivos do consumidor de moda sustentável afastar-se da percepção das outras pessoas e expressar suas opiniões e valores a partir de suas compras (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Lundblad &amp; Davies, 2016</xref>). Dessa forma, a falta de suporte estatístico para a relação entre normas subjetivas e intenção de compra de moda sustentável pode ser decorrente do desejo da amostra por itens sustentáveis que supram aspirações individuais, afastando-se do entendimento tradicional da moda como forma de aproximação social e cumprimento de normas sociais.</p>
				<p>Finalmente, esta pesquisa aferiu o impacto da intenção de compra e das experiências ecológicas passadas, que estimulam a repetição de uma mesma conduta (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Khare &amp; Sadachar, 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Han, 2020</xref>) sobre o consumo real de moda sustentável. A intenção é estabelecida como a variável mais próxima para a efetivação de um comportamento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Klöckner, 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Li <italic>et al</italic>., 2018</xref>), sendo observado, neste estudo, que essa variável foi de fato a mais expressiva em relação ao comportamento de compra sustentável.</p>
				<p>Contudo, embora as variáveis analisadas para investigar o impacto direto no consumo de moda sustentável (comportamento de compra anterior e intenção de compra) tenham alcançado suporte estatístico e possam ser consideradas como determinantes desse tipo de consumo, ao se verificar o coeficiente de determinação (17,7%), discorre-se que a intenção e o comportamento de compra anterior não podem ser vistos como únicos fatores explicativos do consumo real de moda sustentável, o que pode ser abordado em pesquisas futuras.</p>
				<p>O presente estudo ainda investigou a moderação das variáveis demográficas na relação entre intenção de compra e o consumo real de moda sustentável. Assim, conquanto a variável gênero tenha moderado a relação proposta, não se observou diferença significativa entre pessoas de gêneros distintos. Em contrariedade, os índices obtidos indicaram que a relação entre intenção de compra e consumo real de moda sustentável foi mais intensa no grupo de jovens consumidores. Esse achado vai ao encontro de pesquisas anteriores as quais consideram que pessoas jovens são mais receptivas a ideais e a produtos de moda ecológica (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Hwang <italic>et al</italic>., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Baier <italic>et al</italic>., 2020</xref>).</p>
				<p>A seguir, é apresentada a conclusão do estudo.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="conclusions">
				<title>6. Conclusão</title>
				<p>Ao se considerar o comportamento pró-ambiental como fator essencial para a construção de ambientes efetivamente sustentáveis, este estudo buscou verificar os determinantes que influenciam o comportamento de consumidores de moda sustentável. A indústria da moda chama atenção por se referir a um setor que apresenta diversos problemas de insustentabilidade, tanto em seus processos de produção, quanto de consumo e sociais relacionados às questões trabalhistas.</p>
				<p>Por conseguinte, objetivando responder às provocações de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Mukendi <italic>et al</italic>. (2020</xref>), este estudo utilizou-se da TPB para identificar fatores psicológicos, sociais e demográficos que influenciam o comportamento de consumidores reais de moda sustentável em uma população pouco investigada anteriormente e que possui forte impacto da moda em sua cultura, isto é, os consumidores brasileiros.</p>
				<p>Com base nos achados da pesquisa de campo, pode-se considerar que os brasileiros investigados que consomem moda sustentável são conscientes dos impactos sociais e ambientais gerados pela moda, realizam reflexões morais sobre as suas ações de compra, apresentam atitudes e intenções favoráveis para o consumo de moda sustentável, não se empenhando de igual modo às pressões sociais, e considerando experiências passadas para determinar o consumo de itens de moda sustentáveis.</p>
				<p>Em âmbito gerencial, ao se verificar que as escolhas de produtos de moda sustentável estão mais relacionadas aos fatores individuais e aos impactos ambientais causados pelo consumo do que em razão de influências e pressões de terceiros, parece pertinente que os profissionais de marketing busquem relacionar em suas estratégias de promoção os fatores éticos e os impactos sociais inerentes aos produtos de moda sustentável, para que os consumidores possam perceber a contribuição que o consumo daquele item trará ao meio ambiente, à sociedade e aos próprios consumidores.</p>
				<p>Como exemplo de estratégia a ser adotada, os varejistas de moda sustentável podem se valer de diferentes meios de comunicação, tais como as redes sociais digitais, sites especializados de troca de experiências, dentre outros, para exibir campanhas que busquem conscientizar os consumidores sobre os problemas ambientais e sociais acarretados ao consumo insustentável e que promovam mensagens de estímulo à responsabilidade social dos indivíduos.</p>
				<p>A divulgação de informações sobre os benefícios associados aos produtos de moda sustentável deve buscar despertar nos consumidores a percepção de que eles podem gerar impactos positivos ao escolherem produtos sustentáveis ao invés dos convencionais mais poluentes. Isto é, as empresas devem apostar em programas de educação ambiental informativos que foquem em orientar o público em geral sobre o que de fato caracteriza a moda sustentável e as causas relacionadas a essa indústria, bem como que promovam o entendimento sobre os meios de produção desses itens e a importância de políticas como logística reserva, uso de matéria-prima orgânica, aumento do ciclo de vida dos produtos, etc. Acredita-se que tais estratégias poderão influenciar em atitudes, intenções e comportamentos reais de compra mais conscientes.</p>
				<sec>
					<title>6.1. Limitações de pesquisa e estudos futuros</title>
					<p>Embora o estudo tenha contribuições específicas para o entendimento sobre o comportamento do consumidor de moda sustentável, este apresenta algumas limitações. Inicialmente, o tamanho da amostra analisada pode ser considerado como reduzido, o que limita a generalização dos resultados. Pesquisas futuras podem ampliar este estudo em termos de demografia e comparações de contextos e culturas semelhantes. Ademais, a capacidade preditiva do modelo pode ser melhorada a partir da adição de outros construtos relevantes, sugerindo-se futuras análises sobre o impacto de fatores como os valores individuais e os traços de personalidade dos consumidores. Considera-se, ainda, que o comportamento de consumo de moda sustentável foi medido como comportamento relatado pelo respondente, dado o desenho da pesquisa como survey. Estudos futuros poderão incluir a escolha efetiva do consumidor por um item de moda sustentável, por meio de experimentos, por exemplo.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
		</body>
	</sub-article>-->
</article>