<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" specific-use="sps-1.8" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">bbr</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>BBR. Brazilian Business Review</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">BBR, Braz. Bus. Rev.</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="epub">1807-734X</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Fucape Business School</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15728/bbr.2023.20.1.3.en</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">00003</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Article</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>Board Interlocking and Accounting Choices in Brazilian Electric Energy Companies with Stock Exchange</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="pt">
					<trans-title><italic>Board Interlocking</italic> e Escolhas Contábeis em Empresas Brasileiras de Energia Elétrica com Ações na Bolsa</trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-3547-9539</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
						<given-names>Flávio</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-3998-6263</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Clemente</surname>
						<given-names>Ademir</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
          <role>methodology</role>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Irati, Paraná, Brazil</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Irati</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">Paraná</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
					<email>flavioribeiro@unicentro.br</email>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidade Federal do Paraná</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal do Paraná</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Curitiba</named-content>
					<named-content content-type="state">Paraná</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
					<email>ademir@ufpr.br</email>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">
					<label>Email:</label>
					<email>flavioribeiro@unicentro.br </email>
				</corresp>
				<corresp id="c2">
					<label>Email:</label>
					<email>ademir@ufpr.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="con" id="fn1">
					<label>AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTION</label>
					<p><bold>FR:</bold> Introduction, references, results, discussions and conclusions. <bold>AC:</bold> Method, discussions.</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn2">
					<label>2</label>
					<p> The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<!--<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>20</day>
				<month>04</month>
				<year>2023</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">-->
                <pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
                    <season>Jan-Feb</season>
                    <year>2023</year>
                </pub-date>
                <volume>20</volume>
                <issue>1</issue>
			<fpage>38</fpage>
			<lpage>55</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>01</day>
					<month>05</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="rev-recd">
					<day>28</day>
					<month>06</month>
					<year>2020</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>10</day>
					<month>03</month>
					<year>2022</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>Abstract</title>
				<p>This article aims to analyze the influence of stability and the intensity of board interlocking on accounting choices. The sample consists of 57 companies in the electricity sector out of a total of 59 with shares traded on Brasil, Bolsa, Balcão (B3), analyzed in a a period ranging from 2010 to 2016. This resulted in 177 different connections between companies. Company stability and intensity of existing relationships between the boards were used as proxies for an interlocking framework. For determining the accounting choice, an attempt was made to identify similarities between the choices adopted by the companies. The findings reveal considerable changes in the connection structures of companies. This began with the formation of a major network in the years 2010 and 2011, and ended with five well-defined groups in 2016. The results suggest that stability and intensity of connections favor dissemination of accounting choices. This is especially true for choices related to measurement and classification. These findings converge with Connelly and Slyke (2012) according to whom the existence of common counselors favor the access and dissemination of information between companies.</p>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="pt">
				<title>Resumo </title>
				<p>Este artigo tem como objetivo analisar a influência da estabilidade e da intensidade do board interlocking nas escolhas contábeis em companhias do setor de energia elétrica com ações negociadas no Brasil, Bolsa e Balcão (B3), no período 2010-2016. Para isso foi utilizada uma amostra constituída por 59 companhias, das quais 57 apresentaram as informações necessárias para a realização da análise, resultando em 177 diferentes conexões entre as empresas. Como proxies para o board interlocking, empregaram-se a estabilidade e a intensidade das conexões entre os profissionais dos conselhos, e para as escolhas contábeis buscou-se identificar a semelhança entre as escolhas adotadas pelas empresas. Os achados revelam consideráveis mudanças nas estruturas das conexões das companhias, partindo da formação de uma grande rede nos anos de 2010 e 2011, para a constituição de cinco grupos bem definidos em 2016. Os resultados sugerem que a estabilidade e intensidade das conexões favorecem a disseminação das escolhas contábeis, principalmente quando relacionadas a mensuração e classificação. Esses achados convergem com os de Connelly e Slyke (2012) segundo os quais a existência de conselheiros em comum favorece o acesso e a disseminação de informações entre empresas.</p>
</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Keywords:</title>
				<kwd>Board Interlocking</kwd>
				<kwd>Board Interlocking stability</kwd>
				<kwd>Intensity of Board Interlocking</kwd>
				<kwd>Accounting Choices</kwd>
				<kwd>Electricity Sector</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="pt">
				<title>Palavras-chave:</title>
				<kwd>Board Interlocking</kwd>
				<kwd>Estabilidade do Board Interlocking</kwd>
				<kwd>Intensidade do Board Interlocking</kwd>
				<kwd>Escolhas Contábeis</kwd>
				<kwd>Setor de Energia Elétrica</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="1"/>
				<table-count count="7"/>
				<equation-count count="4"/>
				<ref-count count="59"/>
				<page-count count="18"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>1. Introduction</title>
			<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Baysinger and Butler (1985</xref>) the board of directors (BD) is an essential part of corporate governance structure, helping to solve agency problems inherent in organizations’ management. Although the main role of the BD is aligned with the protection of investors' interests, recent studies have shown that its members can influence the decision-making of organizations when they simultaneously serve more than one company. This phenomenon of interconnection between directors is known as board interlocking. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Pfeffer and Salancik (1978</xref>) state that when a professional is appointed to a board of directors, he or she is expected to provide resources to help the company develop. They suggest that the adoption of board interlocking can provide several benefits such as: i) provision of specific resources, ii) assistance in obtaining support from important elements external to a company, iii) legitimation, and iv) creation of a channel of communication between organizations.</p>
			<p>Regarding the creation of a communication channel between organizations, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Connelly and Van Slyke (2012</xref>) state that the existence of common directors in different companies favors the access and dissemination of information. Empirical studies have investigated this prerogative on the most varied corporate practices, such as: director compensation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Addy et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Balsam et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Boivie et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Crespí-Cladera &amp; Pascual-Fuster, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kim et al., 2015</xref>), mergers and acquisitions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cai and Sevilir, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">El-Khatib et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Renneboog &amp; Zhao, 2013</xref>), investments in research and development (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Helmers et al., 2017</xref>), corporate reputation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chandler et al., 2013</xref>), earnings management (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chiu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ribeiro &amp; Colauto, 2016</xref>).</p>
			<p>Perceptibly, literature converges from the perspective that access and dissemination of accounting practices can be facilitated by board interlocking. However, none of these studies focus on accounting method choices. Indeed, from an information perspective, literature indicates that accounting methods are selected to reveal information and forecasts about company's future cash flows (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Holthausen &amp; Leftwich, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Watts &amp; Zimmerman, 1990</xref>). Thus, accounting methods are relevant to company values and impact future cash flows (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Han et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
			<p>
				<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Holthausen (1990</xref>) suggests that if board professionals bring a comparative advantage in accessing resources and obtaining information for their companies, they will have more power and influence over the estimation of the companies' future cash flows. Therefore, the choice of accounting methods is a very important decision made by the board members. These professionals use their choics of accounting methods to signal their vision about the prospects of their companies, and to improve the reliability and relevance of accounting information (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Han et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
			<p>In light of this, it is understood that the presence of common directors across two or more companies can also influence the decision on the accounting choices of organizations. This tends to occur with greater emphasis when connections are stable and intense. Considering what has been revealed, this article aims to analyze the influence of stability and intensity of board interlocking on accounting choices in companies in the electric energy segment with shares traded on the B3 stock exchange, in the period of 2010-2016.</p>
			<p>According to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Silveira (2004</xref>), the Brazilian economy presents a high concentration of ownership and, thus, the role of a board of directors stands out for minimizing agency costs between controllers and minority shareholders.</p>
			<p>Furthermore, specifically in the Brazilian electricity sector, there has been a restructuring in recent years, due to the high demand for distribution and production of electric energy, converging on a greater participation of the private sector (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Serafim, 2011</xref>). No doubt, the peculiar characteristics of Brazil and the electric energy segment represent a fertile ground for research in the field of finance.</p>
			<p>The term stability here indicates the ability of links between boards of directors to be maintained over time. This stability of connections can favor the flow of information between organizations, helping the dissemination of corporate practices. On the other hand, intensity refers to the magnitude with which connections are made. Thus, the presence of a board member acting in two organizations has a lower intensity than the presence of two or more connected members.</p>
			<p>In terms of originality, an important contribution to financial studies is the proposal of a new methodology to measure connections between BDs. Most studies have adopted social network variables and inclusion of dummies to represent board interlocking. Such variables have considerable limitations, such as the fact that analysis of social networks corresponds to a static representation of the social behavior of organizations and, in using dummies, the attribution of dichotomous values undervalues the impact of sharing more than one BD member. The use of the concepts of stability and intensity of connections aims to broaden the discussion on the role of board members in organizational content and explain how certain practices, more specifically accounting choices, can be disseminated among organizations.</p>
			<p>As one of the main results found, it has been observed empirically that stable and intense connections favor the dissemination of accounting choices, especially when related to measurement and classification. These findings converge with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Connelly and Slyke (2012</xref>) for whom the existence of common directors in different companies favors access and dissemination of information.</p>
			<p>This article comprises, in addition to this introduction, four other sections: Theoretical Foundation, Methodology, Analysis and Discussion of Results and Conclusion.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec>
			<title>2. Theoretical foundation</title>
			<p>This section comprises the relevant concepts and theoretical foundations.</p>
			<sec>
				<title>2.1. Board Interlocking Stability and Intensity</title>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fich and White (2005</xref>) understand that board interlocking is characterized by the presence of a professional who occupies a position of director in two or more companies. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mizruchi (1996</xref>) states that such a phenomenon occurs when a person affiliated with an organization participates in the BD of another organization. Therefore, board interlocking can be understood as a phenomenon in which members of a company’s board participate in the core of decision making for another board, establishing a link between two organizations.</p>
				<p>For a long time, interconnected networks of boards represented a contentious phenomenon, because they could compromise the effectiveness of corporate governance. Indeed, it is reasonable to doubt that directors, who must play different roles on different boards, can effectively act in the interests of all the companies they serve (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mizruchi, 1996</xref>). However, it is also prudent to assume that having professionals sitting on the boards of other companies can facilitate the sharing of information, experience, and techniques. This can occur more evidently when connections have characteristics of stability and intensity.</p>
				<p>The analysis of social networks makes it possible to identify in detail patterns of relationships between actors in each social situation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Marques, 1999</xref>). The basic principle of network analysis is that a structure of social relationships determines the content of those relationships. Network theorists reject the notion that people are combinations of attributes, or that institutions are static entities with clearly defined boundaries (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mizruchi, 2006</xref>).</p>
				<p>The focus of social network analysis is the structure of social groups, seeking to identify the relationships between actors in the groups (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wasserman &amp; Faust 1994</xref>). For a long time, a frequent criticism of network analysis has been that its proponents have succeeded in creating elegant mathematical descriptions of social structures, but not so successful in demonstrating that such structures have behavioral consequences. In no area were these criticisms more emphatic than in the study of relationships between organizations. Although some of the early studies have shown that centrality in networks between organizations is associated with identifiable organizational outcomes, including an organization's likelihood of political success (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Galaskiewicz, 1979</xref>) and its investment strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ratcliff, 1980</xref>), such demonstrations have been few up until the mid-1980s. Since then, studies suggesting that a company's position in networks influences its behavior have proliferated (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mizruchi, 2006</xref>).</p>
				<p>One of the most important points about social network analysis is its role as representation. The social networks of a complex system such as a society usually represent a photograph of the structure at a given moment and not a film (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Recuero et al., 2015</xref>). Therefore, it is necessary to understand that a static representation will hardly account for social complexity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Watts, 2003</xref>).</p>
				<p>More severe criticisms are made for the use of dummies to represent board interlocking. Assigning dichotomous values to connections implies a great loss of information, underestimating their implicit characteristics, such as, for example, the fact that the impact is different depending on whether two companies share one director, or two or more. However, by the logic of using dummies, the same value would be assigned to all cases.</p>
				<p>In view of these criticisms on the operationalization of board interlocking, this study considers two variables to characterize connections between boards: (i) Stability; and (ii) Intensity. The term stability derives from the Latin <italic>stabilĭtas</italic> and means the quality of being stable, the quality of maintaining equilibrium (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ferreira, 1986</xref>). Focusing on formation of board interlocking, stability can be understood as the ability of links between the Boards of Directors to become stable over time. For example, the stability between two companies with uninterrupted connections for years is greater than one between two companies that made their connections in just one year. It is understood that stability between organizations can favor the flow of information between them, helping the dissemination of corporate practices, which is an assumption to be tested in this study.</p>
				<p>Another relevant feature that existing works on board interlocking have neglected is the intensity of connections. Conceptually, intensity refers to a characteristic attributed to something or someone that is present in large proportions. Normally, this characteristic is related to the fact that something manifests itself or makes itself felt with force, vigor, or something that is intense (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ferreira, 1986</xref>).</p>
				<p>From the perspective of board interlocking, intensity refers to the magnitude with which connections are made. Thus, the presence of a board member acting in two organizations has a lower intensity than the presence of two or more connected members.</p>
				<p>Metrics of stability and intensity are still unprecedented in studies on organizational connections. This can represent an important contribution to the effects of board interlocking.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2.2. Accounting choices and convergence process</title>
				<p>Conceptually, accounting choices are any decisions with an objective to influence the results of accounting, including not only the financial statements themselves, but also any other information and documents derived from accounting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fields et al., 2001</xref>). Accounting choices encompass managers' preferences for a given measurement, recognition, or disclosure procedure over another, whenever more than one procedure is equally accepted in accordance with best accounting practices (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Watts, 1992</xref>)</p>
				<p>In Brazil, the process of convergence to international standards began with the amendments to the Law 6404/76 promoted by Laws 11638/07 and 11941/09. Since the publication of Law 11638/07, the Accounting Pronouncements Committee (CPC in Portuguese) has been the main body that issues Brazilian accounting standards in accordance with the standards produced by the IASB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Silva et al., 2018</xref>).</p>
				<p>Adopting accounting standards to provide a disclosure language that meets the needs of all companies in all markets is a difficult task because the level of development in global markets differs in regards to issues such as investor or creditor protection, regulation, and enforcement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fields et al., 2001</xref>). <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Nobes (2006</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B32">2013</xref>) points out factors that contribute to differences in disclosure of accounting information. These factors were classified as overt options (observable options) and covert options (unobservable options), as shown in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Figure 1</xref>.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f1">
						<label>Figure 1.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Accounting choices</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="1808-2386-bbr-20-01-38-gf1.jpg"/>
						<attrib>Source: adapted from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Silva and Martins (2015</xref>).</attrib>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>Overt options are understood as arising from measurement, disclosure, classification criteria, as well as choices in stages of adoption of standards. These choices are easily identified in accounting reports. Covert options, on the other hand, result from managers’ operational decisions, as well as from gaps in accounting standards, and involve professional judgment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Silva et al., 2016</xref>).</p>
				<p>With adoption of IFRS, accounting began a process of transitioning from accounting based on rules to accounting based on principles, in order to improve the representation of the economic-financial situations of companies, which increased the subjectivism arising from professional judgment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bennett et al., 2006</xref>). This subjectivism in applying IFRS is provided by its flexibility and allows accounting choices.</p>
				<p>With the advent of convergence to international accounting standards, flexibility of decisions regarding accounting choices underwent changes, which included measurement, recognition, classification, and disclosure criteria. In relation to measurement criteria, these stand out: (i ) investment property; (ii) adjustment to present value of short-term assets and liabilities; and (iii) inventories. Regarding recognition, the following should be noted: (i) methods of depreciation of fixed assets; (ii) methods of amortization of intangibles; and (iii) financial instruments. As for classification, the elements of Statement of Cash Flows (SCF) are: (i) interest paid; (ii) dividends and interest on equity paid; (iii) interest received; and (iv) dividends and interest on equity received. Finally, disclosure criteria encompass: (i) Statement of Cash Flows; (ii) Comprehensive Income Statement; (iii) other comprehensive income statements.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="methods">
			<title>3. Methodological notes</title>
			<p>From a theoretical perspective, this is a positivist study that proposes to empirically investigate the stability and intensity of connections between companies Board of Directors’ (direct) and their relationships with decisions on accounting choices (indirect).</p>
			<p>The sample was restricted to Brazilian companies in the electricity sector that have connections with another company through their BD professionals, and which show the necessary information to identify the accounting choices over the period from 2010 to 2016. This sector has peculiar characteristics, such as a high level of connections, which can contribute to understanding the techniques used. The B3 stock exchange’s electricity sector is made up of 59 companies, of which 57 provided the information necessary to carry out the analysis, resulting in 177 connections between the companies. The two excluded companies did not present information for the entire period.</p>
			<sec>
				<title>3.1. Variables and Analysis Model</title>
				<p>To obtain the variables related to accounting choices, two steps were carried out. First, the standards that present different options for measurement, recognition, classification, and disclosure of accounting information were identified. Then, after the identification of the norms, the accounting choices of the sampled companies were mapped based on the accounting reports.</p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table 1</xref> presents the items that make up the similarity metric of accounting choices. These items were obtained from <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Andrade et al. (2013</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Han et al. (2017</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Maciel et al. (2018</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Moreira et al. (2015</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Pinto et al. (2015</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Scherer et al. (2012</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sedki et al. (2018</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Silva and Barranco (2015</xref>); Silva and Martins (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">2018</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Silvestre and Malaquias (2015</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Simeon and John (2018</xref>); <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Souza et al. (2015</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t1">
						<label>Table 1.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Accounting Choices Metric</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
                            <thead>
                                <tr>
									<th align="center"> </th>
									<th align="center">Items</th>
									<th align="center">Values</th>
									<th align="center">Source*</th>
								</tr>
                            </thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="6"><bold>Measurement Accounting Choices</bold></td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">PPI (Investment property)</td>
									<td align="center">Historical cost (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 28</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Fair value (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Customers/Suppliers - adjustment to present value - Short Term</td>
									<td align="center">Yes (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 12</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">No (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Inventories</td>
									<td align="center">PEPS (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 16</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Average cost (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="6"><bold>Recognition accounting choices</bold></td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Depreciation</td>
									<td align="center">Linear only (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 27</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Others (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Amortization - Intangible (defined useful life)</td>
									<td align="center">Linear only (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 04</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Others (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Financial Instrument</td>
									<td align="center">Result (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 38, 39, 40</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">PL (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="8"><bold>Classification accounting choices</bold></td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2"> Interest Paid</td>
									<td align="center">Operating CF (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Financial CF (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Dividends and Interest on Equity Paid</td>
									<td align="center">Operating CF (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">CF Financial (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Interest received</td>
									<td align="center">Operating CF (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Investment CF (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Dividends and Interest on Equity Received</td>
									<td align="center">Operating CF (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Investment CF (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="6"><bold>Disclosure accounting choices</bold></td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Operating Cash Flow</td>
									<td align="center">Direct method (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Indirect method (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Comprehensive Income Statement</td>
									<td align="center">Statement of changes in equity (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 26</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Own report (0)</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Other Comprehensive Results</td>
									<td align="center">After taxes (1)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 26</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Before taxes (0)</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN1">
								<p>Source: Authors (2020).</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p>*CPC refers to Accounting Pronouncements Committee</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>For the metric of similarity of accounting choices, each item received a dichotomous valuation, either 0 or 1. Subsequently, the values obtained by the individual companies were compared with the other companies with which they maintain a connection. In the case of equal values, a value of 1 (one) was assigned, for divergent values, it was 0 (zero). Then, the items of each classification (measurement, recognition, classification, and disclosure) were added and divided by the total of each classification. For example, for measurement choices, the maximum similarity is 6. If in comparing with a connected company the result was 4, a value of 4/6 or 0.67 was assigned. The values thus calculated can vary between 0 and 1 and, therefore, Logit Regression was adopted.</p>
				<p>To determine the values of variables related to accounting choices, the sample was segregated into 3 parts, the middle part was disregarded, assigned a value of 1 to scores in the upper tercile, and 0 (zero) to scores in the lower one.</p>
				<p>Board interlocking stability and intensity were used as independent variables. Stability is understood as the ability of connections to be constant over the years, that is, the maintenance of the simultaneous presence of members on the boards of companies. </p>
				<p>To identify the stability of connections the <italic>Formulário de Referência</italic> (Reference Form) of each company was accessed. Subsequently, item 12.5/6 (section 12) was consulted, which specifies the composition and professional experience of the management and the fiscal council. There, the names of all members that make up the executive board, the BD and the fiscal council can be identified.</p>
				<p>The names of professionals with their respective CPF numbers (the Brazilian federal register of individuals) were tabulated for each year. Subsequently, a filter was applied to identify professionals who work simultaneously on two or more boards. The connections between the companies and their duration were identified. Some lasted only a year, but others became constant over the whole period.</p>
				<p>As control variables, the classification of companies as state-owned and private, corporate governance and issuance of ADRs (American depositary receipts) were used. To identify the presence of state-owned companies, a dummy variable was used, which received a value of 1 if a company was state-owned, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Camilo et al. (2012</xref>). The variable referring to corporate governance separates the companies that participate in the segments of corporate governance from others. Also, according to <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Silveira et al. (2004</xref>), companies that presented ADRs received value 1, and 0 was assigned to others.</p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref> describes variables and their operational definitions.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>Table 2.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Variables’ definition</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="center">Construct</th>
									<th align="center">Variable</th>
									<th align="center">Acronym</th>
									<th align="center">Classification</th>
									<th align="center">Operational definition</th>
									<th align="center">Measurement procedure</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="4">Accounting choices</td>
									<td align="center">Measurement</td>
									<td align="center">ECM</td>
									<td align="center">Dependent</td>
									<td align="left" rowspan="4">Value obtained through the Accounting Choices Metric</td>
									<td align="left" rowspan="4">Value 1 if the average of the scores in the period was greater than 0.50, and 0 otherwise.</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Recognition</td>
									<td align="center">ECR</td>
									<td align="center">Dependent</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Classification</td>
									<td align="center">ECC</td>
									<td align="center">Dependent</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Disclosure</td>
									<td align="center">ECE</td>
									<td align="center">Dependent</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="3">Board interlocking</td>
									<td align="center">Stability</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>ESTAB</italic></td>
									<td align="center">Independent</td>
									<td align="left">Identifies the stability of connections</td>
									<td align="left">Ratio between the number of years with connections and the total</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Intensity</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>INTENS</italic></td>
									<td align="center">Independent</td>
									<td align="left">Refers to the strength of connections</td>
									<td align="left">Average of connections during the period</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Stability and Intensity</td>
									<td align="center"><italic>ESTAB_INTENS</italic></td>
									<td align="center">Independent</td>
									<td align="left">Multiplicative metric for association between stability and intensity</td>
									<td align="left">Multiplication of stability by intensity</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" rowspan="3">Control variables</td>
									<td align="center">State-Owned</td>
									<td align="center">EP</td>
									<td align="center">Control</td>
									<td align="left">Indicates whether a company is State-owned </td>
									<td align="left">State-owned: 1; otherwise: 0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Corporate governance</td>
									<td align="center">NGC</td>
									<td align="center">Control</td>
									<td align="left">Corporate governance </td>
									<td align="left">Corporate governance: 1; otherwise: 0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">ADRs</td>
									<td align="center">ADR</td>
									<td align="center">Control</td>
									<td align="left">Identifies whether a company issues ADRs</td>
									<td align="left">Yes: 1; No: 0</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p>Source: Authors (2020).</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>Based on the variables defined in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table 2</xref>, the following models were specified:</p>
                <p>
	<disp-formula id="e1">
    <mml:math id="m1" display="block">           
<mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>_</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>
     <label>(1)</label> 
    </disp-formula>
</p>
                <p>
	<disp-formula id="e2">
    <mml:math id="m2" display="block">           
<mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>_</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>
     <label>(2)</label> 
    </disp-formula>
</p>
                <p>
	<disp-formula id="e3">
    <mml:math id="m3" display="block">           
<mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>_</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>
     <label>(3)</label> 
    </disp-formula>
</p>
                <p>
	<disp-formula id="e4">
    <mml:math id="m4" display="block">           
<mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>_</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>
     <label>(4)</label> 
    </disp-formula>
</p>
				<p>Where: </p>
				<p>ECM - Measurement Accounting Choices</p>
				<p>ECR - Recognition Accounting Choices</p>
				<p>ECC - Classification Accounting Choices</p>
				<p>ECE - Disclosure Accounting Choices</p>
				<p>ESTAB - Stability of connections</p>
				<p>INTENS - Intensity of connections</p>
				<p>ESTAB_INTENS - Stability and Intensity of connections</p>
				<p>EP - State-owned </p>
				<p>NGC - Corporate governance </p>
				<p>ADR - ADRs </p>
				<p>ε - Statistical disturbance</p>
				<p>Then, Logit Regression Analysis was performed to test the effects of board interlocking stability and intensity on the similarity of accounting choices.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
			<title>4. Analysis and Discussion of Results</title>
			<p>The panorama of connections between companies revealed considerable changes in the structure of network, from a large network in 2010 and 2011 to the formation of five well-defined groups in 2016. The electric energy sector has nine well-defined groups of companies. These groups showed stability in their connections during the 7 year period analyzed. Among the stable connections are the connections made by Cemig, Light and Teasa, in addition to the Northeastern energy network formed by Conserv, Termopernanbuco, Elektro Redes, Itapebi, Coelba, Afluente, Neoenergia and Uptick, which represent the largest number of interconnected companies.</p>
			<p>The results of descriptive statistical analysis are presented in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table 3</xref>.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t3">
					<label>Table 3.</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Descriptive statistical analysis <sup>1</sup></title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Variables</th>
								<th align="center">Minimum</th>
								<th align="center">Maximum</th>
								<th align="center">Average</th>
								<th align="center">SD</th>
								<th align="center">CV</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">INTENS</td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
								<td align="center">47.29</td>
								<td align="center">3.98</td>
								<td align="center">7.27</td>
								<td align="center">1.83</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ESTAB</td>
								<td align="center">0.14</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.60</td>
								<td align="center">0.36</td>
								<td align="center">0.59</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">INTENS_ESTAB</td>
								<td align="center">0.02</td>
								<td align="center">47.29</td>
								<td align="center">3.71</td>
								<td align="center">7.34</td>
								<td align="center">1.98</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ECM<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.85</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.85</td>
								<td align="center">0.17</td>
								<td align="center">0.20</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ECR<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.78</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.78</td>
								<td align="center">0.18</td>
								<td align="center">0.23</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ECC<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.79</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.79</td>
								<td align="center">0.15</td>
								<td align="center">0.19</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ECE<sup>2</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0.84</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.84</td>
								<td align="center">0.13</td>
								<td align="center">0.15</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ADR</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.30</td>
								<td align="center">0.46</td>
								<td align="center">1.53</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">NGC</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.64</td>
								<td align="center">0.48</td>
								<td align="center">0.75</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">EP</td>
								<td align="center">0.00</td>
								<td align="center">1.00</td>
								<td align="center">0.35</td>
								<td align="center">0.48</td>
								<td align="center">1.37</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN4">
							<p>Source: Authors (2020).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN5">
							<p>Notes: (1) INTENS: Intensity of connections; ESTAB: Stability of connections; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensity multiplied by Stability; ECM: Measurement Accounting Choices; ECR: Recognition Accounting Choices; ECC: Classification Accounting Choices; ECE: Disclosure Accounting Choices; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Corporate governance; EP: State-owned. (2) Dichotomized values according to subsection 3.1.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Descriptive statistics show that the average intensity of connections is approximately 4 members per connection, however the standard deviation is high, which suggests the presence of heterogeneous numbers of connections, that is, while some companies present more than forty members in common some others present only one professional in common.</p>
			<p>Regarding stability, most connections last longer than 4 years (0.60 x 7 years = 4.2 years). This result indicates that connections between companies in the electricity sector are, in general, stable and show few oscillations.</p>
			<p>In respect to accounting choices, the similarity scores between companies that make up connections do not differ substantially, although such similarities being higher in measurement (0.85) and disclosure (0.84).</p>
			<p>The statistics of the control variables indicate that most companies do not have securities traded on the American stock exchanges (ADRs), as the average is below 0.5. In addition, there is a predominance of private companies in the sector, which differ in respect to corporate governance.</p>
			<p>The results of Logit Regression are shown in <xref ref-type="table" rid="t4">Tables 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">6</xref>, and <xref ref-type="table" rid="t7">7</xref>. </p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t4">
					<label>Table 4</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Logit Regression Analysis - Dependent Variable: ECM</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Variables</th>
								<th align="center">Model#1</th>
								<th align="center">Model#2</th>
								<th align="center">Model#3</th>
								<th align="center">Model#4</th>
								<th align="center">Model#5</th>
								<th align="center">Model#6</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Independent</bold></td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"> 
 </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB</td>
								<td align="center">0.3144</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">1.610***</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">1.143</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">2.941</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">INTENS</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.020</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.005</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.841</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.155</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.020</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.060**</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.839</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">2.251</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Control</bold></td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"> 
 </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">EP</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-2.265***</td>
								<td align="center">-2.541***</td>
								<td align="center">-2.533***</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-4.144</td>
								<td align="center">-4.494</td>
								<td align="center">-4.188</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ADR</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.455</td>
								<td align="center">-0.183</td>
								<td align="center">-0.304</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.846</td>
								<td align="center">-0.321</td>
								<td align="center">-0.547</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">NGC</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.541</td>
								<td align="center">-0.425</td>
								<td align="center">0.315</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">1.314</td>
								<td align="center">-0.845</td>
								<td align="center">0.738</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Mean of dependent variable</bold></td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Regression standard error</bold></td>
								<td align="center">0.499</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.448</td>
								<td align="center">0.416</td>
								<td align="center">0.437</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN6">
							<p>Source: Authors (2020).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN7">
							<p>Notes: ***, **, * indicate a significance level lower than 1%, 5% and 10%, respectively. INTENS: Intensity of Connections; ESTAB: Stability of Connections; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensity multiplied by Stability; ECM: Measurement Accounting Choices; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Corporate Governance; and EP: State-owned. Model#1 probes the influence of Stability (ESTAB). Model#2 investigates the relationship with Intensity (INTENS). In Model#3, the influence of the multiplicative variable Stability x Intensity (ESTAB_INTENS) is verified. Model#4 employs the control variables State-owned (EP), Corporate Governance (NGC) and American Depositary Receipt (ADR). Model#5 is performed with the control variables, Stability, and Intensity. Model#6 employs the control variables and the multiplicative variable ESTAB_INTENS.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Measurement accounting choices describe choices regarding the method a company adopts to assess an economic event (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Silva, 2016</xref>). The results indicate that measurement accounting choices are significantly influenced by the stability of connections between boards (p &lt; 0.01). This suggests that the number of professionals simultaneously present in more than one board of directors tends to favor dissemination of choices related to measuring investment property, adjusting to present value, and measuring inventories.</p>
			<p>Furthermore, measurement accounting choices are also influenced by the origin of companies' own capital. The findings indicate that private equity companies tend to present greater similarity between accounting practices.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t5">
					<label>Table 5.</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Logit Regression Analysis - Dependent variable: ECR</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Variables</th>
								<th align="center">Model#1</th>
								<th align="center">Model#2</th>
								<th align="center">Model#3</th>
								<th align="center">Model#4</th>
								<th align="center">Model#5</th>
								<th align="center">Model#6</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Independent</bold></td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB</td>
								<td align="center">-0.143</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-1.027**</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">-0.534</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-2.136</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">INTENS</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.008</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.022</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.392</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.730</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.009 </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.020</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.427 </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.876</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Control</bold></td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">EP</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.097 </td>
								<td align="center">-0.019</td>
								<td align="center">-0.039</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.233 </td>
								<td align="center">-0.044</td>
								<td align="center">-0.093</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ADR</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.424 </td>
								<td align="center">0.305</td>
								<td align="center">0.392</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.892 </td>
								<td align="center">0.632</td>
								<td align="center">0.820</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">NGC</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.343 </td>
								<td align="center">0.847*</td>
								<td align="center">0.390</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.938 </td>
								<td align="center">1.957</td>
								<td align="center">1.050</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Mean of dependent variable</bold></td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500 </td>
								<td align="center">0.500 </td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Regression standard error</bold></td>
								<td align="center">0.501</td>
								<td align="center">0.501</td>
								<td align="center">0.501 </td>
								<td align="center">0.494</td>
								<td align="center">0.486</td>
								<td align="center">0.494</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN8">
							<p>Source: Authors (2020).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN9">
							<p>Notes: ***, **, * indicate a significance level lower than 1%, 5% and 10%, respectively. INTENS: Intensity of Connections; ESTAB: Stability of Connections; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensity multiplied by Stability; ECR: Recognition Accounting Choices; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Corporate Governance; and EP: State-owned. Model#1 probes the influence of Stability (ESTAB). Model#2 investigates the relationship with Intensity (INTENS). In Model#3, the influence of the multiplicative variable Stability x Intensity (ESTAB_INTENS) is verified. Model#4 employs the control variables State-owned (EP), Corporate Governance (NGC) and American Depositary Receipt (ADR). Model#5 is performed with the control variables, Stability, and Intensity. Model#6 employs the control variables and the multiplicative variable ESTAB_INTENS.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Recognition accounting choices (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t5">Table 5</xref>), refer to the way a given economic event is recognized in terms of its impact on financial statements, altering income values, equity components and cash flows. The results indicate that stability of connections negatively influences similarity of recognition accounting choices (Model#5). This does not support the idea that the dissemination of accounting practices could be evidenced from connections established by companies’ BD members. </p>
			<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="t6">Table 6</xref>, the results referring to the classification accounting choices are presented.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t6">
					<label>Table 6.</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Logit Regression Analysis - Dependent Variable: ECC</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Variables</th>
								<th align="center">Model#1</th>
								<th align="center">Model#2</th>
								<th align="center">Model#3</th>
								<th align="center">Model#4</th>
								<th align="center">Model#5</th>
								<th align="center">Model#6</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Independent</bold></td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB</td>
								<td align="center">0.695** </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">1.471**</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">2.429 </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">2.472</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">INTENS</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.133***</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.044</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">2.725</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.760</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.152*** </td>
								<td align="center">  </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.186***</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">2.816 </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">3.041</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Control</bold></td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">EP</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.222 </td>
								<td align="center">-0.406</td>
								<td align="center">-0.266</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"></td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.523 </td>
								<td align="center">-0.904</td>
								<td align="center">-0.595</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ADR</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.718 </td>
								<td align="center">0.960*</td>
								<td align="center">0.826</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">1.451 </td>
								<td align="center">1.848</td>
								<td align="center">1.632</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">NGC</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.544 </td>
								<td align="center">-1.377***</td>
								<td align="center">-0.804**</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-1.441 </td>
								<td align="center">-2.914</td>
								<td align="center">-2.015</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Mean of dependent variable</bold></td>
								<td align="center">0.500 </td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500 </td>
								<td align="center">0.500 </td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Regression standard error</bold></td>
								<td align="center">0.489 </td>
								<td align="center">0.480</td>
								<td align="center">0.477 </td>
								<td align="center">0.495</td>
								<td align="center">0.453</td>
								<td align="center">0.463</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN10">
							<p>Source: Authors (2020).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN11">
							<p>Notes: ***, **, indicate a significance level lower than 1%, 5% and 10%, respectively. INTENS: Intensity of Connections; ESTAB: Stability of Connections; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensity multiplied by Stability; ECC: Classification Accounting Choices; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Level of Corporate Governance; and EP: State-owned Companies. Model#1 probes the influence of Stability (ESTAB). Model#2 investigates the relationship with Intensity (INTENS). In Model#3, the influence of the multiplicative variable Stability x Intensity (ESTAB_INTENS) is verified. Model#4 employs the control variables State-owned (EP), Corporate Governance (NGC) and American Depositary Receipt (ADR). Model#5 is performed with the control variables, Stability, and Intensity. Model#6 employs the control variables and the multiplicative variable ESTAB_INTENS.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Classification accounting choices are related to the way in which equity, income, and cash flows are provided in financial statements. The results suggest that stability and intensity of connections favor dissemination of choices around classification accounting. According to the theory of resource dependence, interconnected advisors can provide unprecedented and detailed information and knowledge that is obtained from other companies and that is relevant and crucial for decisions and strategies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Shropshire, 2010</xref>). Thus, board interlocking provides comparative advantages in corporate decisions, including decisions on accounting methods, due to its ability to acquire and interpret information (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Rao et al., 2000</xref>).</p>
			<p>The results also indicate that corporate governance negatively influences the similarity of classification accounting choices. In other words, companies that do not belong to the corporate governance levels tend to present greater similarity in accounting practices with companies with which they are connected.</p>
			<p>There are also signs that companies with securities traded on American stock exchanges tend to present greater similarities between choices related to the form of disposition in financial statements of equity, income, and cash flow elements. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Silveira et al. (2004</xref>) state that adapting to corporate governance practices required by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for the release of ADRs can increase the company's visibility. Considering that such companies follow both the Brazilian and the North American accounting model, there would be an incentive for them to present greater similarity.</p>
			<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="t7">Table 7</xref>, the results referring to disclosure accounting choices are presented.</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t7">
					<label>Table 7.</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Logit Regression Analysis - Dependent Variable: ECE</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
							<col/>
						</colgroup>
						<thead>
							<tr>
								<th align="left">Variables</th>
								<th align="center">Model#1</th>
								<th align="center">Model#2</th>
								<th align="center">Model#3</th>
								<th align="center">Model#4</th>
								<th align="center">Model#5</th>
								<th align="center">Model#6</th>
							</tr>
						</thead>
						<tbody>
                            <tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Independent</bold></td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB</td>
								<td align="center">0.142</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.118</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">0.541</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.281</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">INTENS</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.015</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.012</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.783</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.453</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.016</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.012</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.805</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.810</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Control</bold></td>
								<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">EP</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.045</td>
								<td align="center">-0.108</td>
								<td align="center">-0.105</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.114</td>
								<td align="center">-0.265</td>
								<td align="center">-0.260</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">ADR</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.370</td>
								<td align="center">-0.327</td>
								<td align="center">-0.325</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">-0.807</td>
								<td align="center">-0.707</td>
								<td align="center">-0.704</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left" rowspan="2">NGC</td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.169</td>
								<td align="center">0.078</td>
								<td align="center">0.125</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center"> </td>
								<td align="center">0.457</td>
								<td align="center">0.193</td>
								<td align="center">0.334</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Mean of dependent variable</bold></td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="left"><bold>Regression standard error</bold></td>
								<td align="center">0.501</td>
								<td align="center">0.500</td>
								<td align="center">0.501</td>
								<td align="center">0.505</td>
								<td align="center">0.507</td>
								<td align="center">0.506</td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN12">
							<p>Source: Authors (2020).</p>
						</fn>
						<fn id="TFN13">
							<p>Notes: ***, **, * indicate a significance level lower than 1%, 5% and 10%, respectively. INTENS: Intensity of Connections; ESTAB: Stability of Connections; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensity multiplied by Stability; ECE: Disclosure Accounting Choices; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Level of Corporate Governance; and EP: State-owned Companies. Model#1 probes the influence of Stability (ESTAB). Model#2 investigates the relationship with Intensity (INTENS). In Model#3, the influence of the multiplicative variable Stability x Intensity (ESTAB_INTENS) is verified. Model#4 employs the control variables State-owned (EP), Corporate Governance (NGC) and American Depositary Receipt (ADR). Model#5 is performed with the control variables, Stability, and Intensity. Model#6 employs the control variables and the multiplicative variable ESTAB_INTENS.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>Disclosure accounting choices refer to the way accounting information is disclosed. The findings indicate that stability and intensity of connections do not have significant effects on the similarity of disclosure accounting choices. These results do not support the idea that the number of connections and their durability favor the dissemination of disclosure accounting practices.</p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>5. Conclusion </title>
			<p>In this paper, we analyzed the influence of stability and intensity of board interlocking on the accounting choices made by companies in the electricity sector who traded shares on the B3, over the period 2010-2016. For this, a sample of 59 companies was used, of which 57 presented the necessary information, resulting in 177 different connections between the sampled companies.</p>
			<p>A priori, the results demonstrated the existence of interesting links that often become hidden for investors in the tangle of companies listed on the stock exchange. Such links can influence investment decisions, especially when considering the premise of diversification.</p>
			<p>Regarding the intensity of connections between members of boards of directors, the highest average of professionals occurred in 2013, with approximately 4.18 members connected in each connection, followed by the years 2010, 2015, and 2011. In 2012, there occurred the lowest average number of connections between companies: 3.69. The results also indicated that the overall average intensity of the connections is 3.98. This average is high because companies such as Cemig Distribuição and Cemig Geração e Transmissão, for example, had an average of 47 professionals in common in the period.</p>
			<p>In general, measurement accounting choices showed a considerable level of similarity. On the average, 85% of the accounting information are similarly evidenced in connected companies. This high level of homogeneity can also be observed in the choices associated with disclosure of the financial statements. The results show that measurement accounting choices, classification accounting choices, and disclosure accounting choices were practically stable from 2012 onwards, indicating that companies that established board of directors’ connections did not significantly change their accounting practices.</p>
			<p>Furthermore, the results suggested that the stability and intensity of connections favor dissemination of accounting choices, especially when related to measurement and classification. These findings converge with <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Connelly and Slyke (2012</xref>) for whom the existence of common directors favors access and dissemination of information.</p>
			<p>The results achieved complement several studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Addy et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Balsam et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Beckman &amp; Haunschild, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cai et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chandler et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chiu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Helmers et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ribeiro &amp; Colauto, 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wong et al., 2015</xref>) which have empirically confirmed that board interlocking can be considered an important information channel.</p>
			<p>Finally, the results found are limited by the sample of companies investigated, as well as by the variables and techniques used. For future studies, the analysis can be expanded considering other control variables, such as business models, and adoption of the same auditing companies, which can culminate in common accounting practices.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<title>References</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Addy, N., Chu, X., &amp; Yoder, T. (2014). Voluntary adoption of clawback provisions, corporate governance, and interlock effects. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(2), 167-189. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.12.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.12.001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Addy</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chu</surname>
							<given-names>X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yoder</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Voluntary adoption of clawback provisions, corporate governance, and interlock effects</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Accounting and Public Policy</source>
					<volume>33</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>167</fpage>
					<lpage>189</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.12.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2013.12.001</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Andrade, M. E. M. C., Silva, D. M. da, &amp; Malaquias, R. F. (2013). Accounting Choices in Investment Properties. Revista Universo Contábil, 9(3), 22-37. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2013320">https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2013320</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Andrade</surname>
							<given-names>M. E. M. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>D. M. da</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Malaquias</surname>
							<given-names>R. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Accounting Choices in Investment Properties</article-title>
					<source>Revista Universo Contábil</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>22</fpage>
					<lpage>37</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2013320">https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2013320</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>Balsam, S., Kwack, S. Y., &amp; Lee, J. Y. (2017). Network connections, CEO compensation and involuntary turnover: The impact of a friend of a friend. Journal of Corporate Finance, 45, 220-244. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Balsam</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kwack</surname>
							<given-names>S. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lee</surname>
							<given-names>J. Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Network connections, CEO compensation and involuntary turnover: The impact of a friend of a friend</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Corporate Finance</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<fpage>220</fpage>
					<lpage>244</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.05.001</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>Baysinger, B. D., &amp; Butler, H. N. (1985). Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition. Journal of Law, Economics &amp; Organization, 1(1), 101-124. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Baysinger</surname>
							<given-names>B. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Butler</surname>
							<given-names>H. N.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1985</year>
					<article-title>Corporate Governance and the Board of Directors: Performance Effects of Changes in Board Composition</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Law, Economics &amp; Organization</source>
					<volume>1</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>101</fpage>
					<lpage>124</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>Beckman, C. M., &amp; Haunschild, P. R. (2002). Network learning: The effects of partner experience heterogeneity on corporate acquisitions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(1), 92-124. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3094892">https://doi.org/10.2307/3094892</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Beckman</surname>
							<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Haunschild</surname>
							<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2002</year>
					<article-title>Network learning: The effects of partner experience heterogeneity on corporate acquisitions</article-title>
					<source>Administrative Science Quarterly</source>
					<volume>47</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>92</fpage>
					<lpage>124</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/3094892">https://doi.org/10.2307/3094892</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>Bennett, B., Bradbury, M., &amp; Prangnell, H. (2006). Rules, principles and judgments in accounting standards. Abacus, 42(2), 189-204. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00197.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00197.x</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bennett</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bradbury</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Prangnell</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Rules, principles and judgments in accounting standards</article-title>
					<source>Abacus</source>
					<volume>42</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>189</fpage>
					<lpage>204</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00197.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2006.00197.x</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>Boivie, S., Bednar, M. K., &amp; Barker, S. B. (2015). Social comparison and reciprocity in director compensation. Journal of Management, 41(6), 1578-1603. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460680">https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460680</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Boivie</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bednar</surname>
							<given-names>M. K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barker</surname>
							<given-names>S. B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Social comparison and reciprocity in director compensation</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Management</source>
					<volume>41</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>1578</fpage>
					<lpage>1603</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460680">https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460680</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>Cai, Y., Dhaliwal, D. S., Kim, Y., &amp; Pan, C. (2014). Board interlocks and the diffusion of disclosure policy. Review of Accounting Studies, 19(3), 1086-1119. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-014-9280-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-014-9280-0</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cai</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dhaliwal</surname>
							<given-names>D. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pan</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2014</year>
					<article-title>Board interlocks and the diffusion of disclosure policy</article-title>
					<source>Review of Accounting Studies</source>
					<volume>19</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>1086</fpage>
					<lpage>1119</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-014-9280-0">https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-014-9280-0</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Cai, Y., &amp; Sevilir, M. (2012). Board connections and M&amp;A transactions. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(2), 327-349. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.017</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Cai</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Sevilir</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Board connections and M&amp;A transactions</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Financial Economics</source>
					<volume>103</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>327</fpage>
					<lpage>349</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.017">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.05.017</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Camilo, S. P. O., Marcon, R., &amp; Bandeira-de-Mello, R. (2012). Conexões Políticas e Desempenho: Um estudo das firmas listadas na BM&amp;FBovespa. Revista de Administação Contemporânea, 16(6), 784-805. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552012000600003">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552012000600003</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Camilo</surname>
							<given-names>S. P. O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Marcon</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bandeira-de-Mello</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Conexões Políticas e Desempenho: Um estudo das firmas listadas na BM&amp;FBovespa</article-title>
					<source>Revista de Administação Contemporânea</source>
					<volume>16</volume>
					<issue>6</issue>
					<fpage>784</fpage>
					<lpage>805</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552012000600003">https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552012000600003</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Chandler, D., Haunschild, P. R., Rhee, M., &amp; Beckman, C. M. (2013). The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 217-244. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013478693">https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013478693</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chandler</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Haunschild</surname>
							<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rhee</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Beckman</surname>
							<given-names>C. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>The effects of firm reputation and status on interorganizational network structure</article-title>
					<source>Strategic Organization</source>
					<volume>11</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>217</fpage>
					<lpage>244</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013478693">https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013478693</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Chiu, P. C., Teoh, S. H., &amp; Tian, F. (2013). Board interlocks and earnings management contagion. Accounting Review, 88(3), 915-944. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50369">https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50369</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Chiu</surname>
							<given-names>P. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Teoh</surname>
							<given-names>S. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tian</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Board interlocks and earnings management contagion</article-title>
					<source>Accounting Review</source>
					<volume>88</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>915</fpage>
					<lpage>944</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50369">https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50369</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>Connelly, B. L., &amp; Van Slyke, E. J. (2012). The power and peril of board interlocks. Business Horizons, 55(5), 403-408. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.006</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Connelly</surname>
							<given-names>B. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Van Slyke</surname>
							<given-names>E. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>The power and peril of board interlocks</article-title>
					<source>Business Horizons</source>
					<volume>55</volume>
					<issue>5</issue>
					<fpage>403</fpage>
					<lpage>408</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.006">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2012.03.006</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Crespí-Cladera, R., &amp; Pascual-Fuster, B. (2015). Executive directors’ pay, networks and operating performance: The influence of ownership structure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34(2), 175-203. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.09.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.09.004</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Crespí-Cladera</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pascual-Fuster</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Executive directors’ pay, networks and operating performance: The influence of ownership structure</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Accounting and Public Policy</source>
					<volume>34</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>175</fpage>
					<lpage>203</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.09.004">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2014.09.004</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>El-Khatib, R., Fogel, K., &amp; Jandik, T. (2015). CEO network centrality and merger performance $. Journal of Financial Economics, 116(2), 349-382. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>El-Khatib</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Fogel</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jandik</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>CEO network centrality and merger performance $</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Financial Economics</source>
					<volume>116</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>349</fpage>
					<lpage>382</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.01.001</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Ferreira, A. B. de H. (1986). Novo dicionário de língua portuguesa (2nd ed.). Nova Fronteira.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ferreira</surname>
							<given-names>A. B. de H.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1986</year>
					<source>Novo dicionário de língua portuguesa</source>
					<edition>2</edition>
					<publisher-name>Nova Fronteira</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B17">
				<mixed-citation>Fich, E. M., &amp; White, L. J. (2005). Why do CEOs reciprocally sit on each other’s boards? Journal of Corporate Finance, 11(1-2), 175-195. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.06.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.06.002</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fich</surname>
							<given-names>E. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>White</surname>
							<given-names>L. J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Why do CEOs reciprocally sit on each other’s boards?</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Corporate Finance,</source>
					<volume>11</volume>
					<issue>1-2</issue>
					<fpage>175</fpage>
					<lpage>195</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.06.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2003.06.002</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B18">
				<mixed-citation>Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., &amp; Vincent, L. (2001). Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 255-307. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Fields</surname>
							<given-names>T. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lys</surname>
							<given-names>T. Z.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vincent</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2001</year>
					<article-title>Empirical research on accounting choice</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Accounting and Economics</source>
					<volume>31</volume>
					<issue>1-3</issue>
					<fpage>255</fpage>
					<lpage>307</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00028-3</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B19">
				<mixed-citation>Galaskiewicz, J. (1979). The structure of community organizational networks the structure of community organizational networks*. Source: Social Forces, 57(4), 1346-1364. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2577274">https://doi.org/10.2307/2577274</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Galaskiewicz</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1979</year>
					<article-title>The structure of community organizational networks the structure of community organizational networks*</article-title>
					<source>Source: Social Forces</source>
					<volume>57</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>1346</fpage>
					<lpage>1364</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2577274">https://doi.org/10.2307/2577274</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B20">
				<mixed-citation>Han, J., Bose, I., Hu, N., Qi, B., &amp; Tian, G. (2015). Does director interlock impact corporate R&amp;D investment? Decision Support Systems, 71, 28-36. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Han</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bose</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hu</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Qi</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tian</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Does director interlock impact corporate R&amp;D investment?</article-title>
					<source>Decision Support Systems</source>
					<volume>71</volume>
					<fpage>28</fpage>
					<lpage>36</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.01.001</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B21">
				<mixed-citation>Han, J., Hu, N., Liu, L., &amp; Tian, G. (2017). Does director interlock impact the diffusion of accounting method choice? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 36(4), 316-334. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.05.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.05.005</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Han</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Hu</surname>
							<given-names>N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Liu</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Tian</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Does director interlock impact the diffusion of accounting method choice?</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Accounting and Public Policy</source>
					<volume>36</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>316</fpage>
					<lpage>334</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.05.005">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2017.05.005</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B22">
				<mixed-citation>Helmers, C., Patnam, M., &amp; Rau, P. R. (2017). Do board interlocks increase innovation? Evidence from a corporate governance reform in India. Journal of Banking and Finance, 80, 51-70. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.04.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.04.001</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Helmers</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Patnam</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Rau</surname>
							<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Do board interlocks increase innovation? Evidence from a corporate governance reform in India</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Banking and Finance</source>
					<volume>80</volume>
					<fpage>51</fpage>
					<lpage>70</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.04.001">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2017.04.001</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B23">
				<mixed-citation>Holthausen, R. W. (1990). Accounting method choice. Opportunistic behavior, efficient contracting, and information perspectives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 12(1-3), 207-218. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90047-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90047-8</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Holthausen</surname>
							<given-names>R. W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>Accounting method choice. Opportunistic behavior, efficient contracting, and information perspectives</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Accounting and Economics</source>
					<volume>12</volume>
					<issue>1-3</issue>
					<fpage>207</fpage>
					<lpage>218</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90047-8">https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90047-8</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B24">
				<mixed-citation>Holthausen, R. W., &amp; Leftwich, R. W. (1983). The economic consequences of accounting choice implications of costly contracting and monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5(C), 77-117. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Holthausen</surname>
							<given-names>R. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Leftwich</surname>
							<given-names>R. W.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1983</year>
					<article-title>The economic consequences of accounting choice implications of costly contracting and monitoring</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Accounting and Economics</source>
					<volume>5</volume>
					<issue>C</issue>
					<fpage>77</fpage>
					<lpage>117</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1">https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(83)90007-1</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B25">
				<mixed-citation>Kim, J. W., Kogut, B., &amp; Yang, J. (2015). Executive compensation, fat cats ,and best athletes. American Sociological Review, 80(2), 299-328. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415572463">https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415572463</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Kim</surname>
							<given-names>J. W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kogut</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Yang</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Executive compensation, fat cats ,and best athletes</article-title>
					<source>American Sociological Review</source>
					<volume>80</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>299</fpage>
					<lpage>328</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415572463">https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415572463</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B26">
				<mixed-citation>Maciel, F. F. de S., Salotti, B. M., &amp; Imoniana, J. O. (2018). Escolhas contábeis na demonstração dos fluxos de caixa no contexto do mercado de capitais brasileiro. Revista Universo Contábil, 13(4), 194-211. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2017432">https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2017432</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Maciel</surname>
							<given-names>F. F. de S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Salotti</surname>
							<given-names>B. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Imoniana</surname>
							<given-names>J. O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Escolhas contábeis na demonstração dos fluxos de caixa no contexto do mercado de capitais brasileiro</article-title>
					<source>Revista Universo Contábil</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>194</fpage>
					<lpage>211</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2017432">https://doi.org/10.4270/ruc.2017432</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B27">
				<mixed-citation>Marques, E. C. (1999). Redes sociais e instituições na construção do Estado e da sua permeabilidade. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, 14(41), 45-67. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69091999000300004">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69091999000300004</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Marques</surname>
							<given-names>E. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1999</year>
					<article-title>Redes sociais e instituições na construção do Estado e da sua permeabilidade</article-title>
					<source>Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais</source>
					<volume>14</volume>
					<issue>41</issue>
					<fpage>45</fpage>
					<lpage>67</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69091999000300004">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-69091999000300004</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B28">
				<mixed-citation>Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271-298. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mizruchi</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1996</year>
					<article-title>What Do Interlocks Do? An Analysis, Critique, and Assessment of Research on Interlocking Directorates</article-title>
					<source>Annual Review of Sociology</source>
					<volume>22</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>271</fpage>
					<lpage>298</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271">https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.22.1.271</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B29">
				<mixed-citation>Mizruchi, M. S. (2006). Análise de redes sociais: Avanços recentes e controvérsias atuais. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 46(3), 72-86. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902006000300013">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902006000300013</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Mizruchi</surname>
							<given-names>M. S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>Análise de redes sociais: Avanços recentes e controvérsias atuais</article-title>
					<source>Revista de Administração de Empresas</source>
					<volume>46</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>72</fpage>
					<lpage>86</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902006000300013">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902006000300013</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B30">
				<mixed-citation>Moreira, F., Firmino, J., Santos, A., Silva, J. D., &amp; Silva, M. (2015). Qualidade da auditoria no Brasil: Um estudo do julgamento dos auditores independentes na aderência do ajuste a valor presente nas companhias de construção e engenharia listadas na BM&amp;F-Bovespa (Audit Quality in Brazil: A Study of the Judgment Ofthe Independent Auditors on Adoption of the Adjustment to Present Value in Construction and Engineering Companies Listed on BM&amp;F-Bovespa). Sociedade, Contabilidade E Gestão, 10(1), 63-80. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830937">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830937</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Moreira</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Firmino</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Santos</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Qualidade da auditoria no Brasil: Um estudo do julgamento dos auditores independentes na aderência do ajuste a valor presente nas companhias de construção e engenharia listadas na BM&amp;F-Bovespa (Audit Quality in Brazil: A Study of the Judgment Ofthe Independent Auditors on Adoption of the Adjustment to Present Value in Construction and Engineering Companies Listed on BM&amp;F-Bovespa)</article-title>
					<source>Sociedade, Contabilidade E Gestão</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>63</fpage>
					<lpage>80</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830937">https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2830937</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B31">
				<mixed-citation>Nobes, C. (2006). The survival of international differences under IFRS: Towards a research agenda. Accounting and Business Research, 36(3), 233-245. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730023">https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730023</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nobes</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<article-title>The survival of international differences under IFRS: Towards a research agenda</article-title>
					<source>Accounting and Business Research</source>
					<volume>36</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>233</fpage>
					<lpage>245</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730023">https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2006.9730023</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B32">
				<mixed-citation>Nobes, C. (2013). The continued survival of international differences under IFRS. Accounting and Business Research, 43(2), 83-111. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.770644">https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.770644</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Nobes</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>The continued survival of international differences under IFRS</article-title>
					<source>Accounting and Business Research</source>
					<volume>43</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>83</fpage>
					<lpage>111</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.770644">https://doi.org/10.1080/00014788.2013.770644</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B33">
				<mixed-citation>Pfeffer, J., &amp; Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pfeffer</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Salancik</surname>
							<given-names>G. R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1978</year>
					<source>The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective</source>
					<publisher-name>Harper and Row</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B34">
				<mixed-citation>Pinto, M. J. T., Martins, V. A., &amp; Silva, D. M. da. (2015). Escolhas Contábeis: O caso brasileiro das propriedades para investimento. Revista Contabilidade &amp; Finanças, 26(69), 274-289. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201512280">https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201512280</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Pinto</surname>
							<given-names>M. J. T.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>V. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>D. M. da.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Escolhas Contábeis: O caso brasileiro das propriedades para investimento</article-title>
					<source>Revista Contabilidade &amp; Finanças</source>
					<volume>26</volume>
					<issue>69</issue>
					<fpage>274</fpage>
					<lpage>289</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201512280">https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201512280</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B35">
				<mixed-citation>Rao, H., Davis, G., &amp; Ward, A. (2000). Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: Why firms leave NASDAQ and Join NYSE. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 268-292. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2667072">https://doi.org/10.2307/2667072</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rao</surname>
							<given-names>H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Davis</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ward</surname>
							<given-names>A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>Embeddedness, social identity and mobility: Why firms leave NASDAQ and Join NYSE</article-title>
					<source>Administrative Science Quarterly</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>268</fpage>
					<lpage>292</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2667072">https://doi.org/10.2307/2667072</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B36">
				<mixed-citation>Ratcliff, R. E. (1980). Banks and Corporate Lending: An analysis of the impact of the internal structure of the capitalist class on The Lending Behavior of Banks. American Sociological Review, 45(4), 553-570.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ratcliff</surname>
							<given-names>R. E.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1980</year>
					<article-title>Banks and Corporate Lending: An analysis of the impact of the internal structure of the capitalist class on The Lending Behavior of Banks</article-title>
					<source>American Sociological Review</source>
					<volume>45</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>553</fpage>
					<lpage>570</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B37">
				<mixed-citation>Recuero, R., Bastos, M., &amp; Zago, G. (2015). Introdução Sobre Mídia Social; O que é análise de redes sociais? In Análise de redes para mídia social (pp. 21-51). Sulina.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Recuero</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Bastos</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zago</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<chapter-title>Introdução Sobre Mídia Social; O que é análise de redes sociais? </chapter-title>
					<source>Análise de redes para mídia social</source>
					<fpage>21</fpage>
					<lpage>51</lpage>
					<publisher-name>Sulina</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B38">
				<mixed-citation>Renneboog, L., &amp; Zhao, Y. (2013). Director networks and takeovers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 218-234. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Renneboog</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhao</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Director networks and takeovers</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Corporate Finance</source>
					<volume>28</volume>
					<fpage>218</fpage>
					<lpage>234</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.11.012</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B39">
				<mixed-citation>Ribeiro, F., &amp; Colauto, R. D. (2016). The relationship between board interlocking and income smoothing practices. Revista Contabilidade &amp; Finanças, 27(70), 55-66. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201501320">https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201501320</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Colauto</surname>
							<given-names>R. D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>The relationship between board interlocking and income smoothing practices</article-title>
					<source>Revista Contabilidade &amp; Finanças</source>
					<volume>27</volume>
					<issue>70</issue>
					<fpage>55</fpage>
					<lpage>66</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201501320">https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201501320</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B40">
				<mixed-citation>Scherer, L. M., Teodoro, J. D., Kos, S. R., &amp; Anjos, R. P. (2012). Demonstração dos Fluxos de caixa: análise de diferenças de procedimentos de divulgação entre empresas listadas nas bolsas de valores de São Paulo, Frankfurt, Milão e Londres. Revista de Contabilidade E Controladoria, 4(2), 37-51. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://doi.org/10.5380/rcc.v4i2.29025">http://doi.org/10.5380/rcc.v4i2.29025</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Scherer</surname>
							<given-names>L. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Teodoro</surname>
							<given-names>J. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Kos</surname>
							<given-names>S. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Anjos</surname>
							<given-names>R. P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Demonstração dos Fluxos de caixa: análise de diferenças de procedimentos de divulgação entre empresas listadas nas bolsas de valores de São Paulo, Frankfurt, Milão e Londres</article-title>
					<source>Revista de Contabilidade E Controladoria</source>
					<volume>4</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>37</fpage>
					<lpage>51</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://doi.org/10.5380/rcc.v4i2.29025">http://doi.org/10.5380/rcc.v4i2.29025</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B41">
				<mixed-citation>Sedki, S. S., Posada, G. A., &amp; Pruske, K. A. (2018). Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS in accounting for goodwill impairment and inventory: Tax treatment under the internal revenue code. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 18(4), 23-29. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v18i4.421">https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v18i4.421</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Sedki</surname>
							<given-names>S. S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Posada</surname>
							<given-names>G. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Pruske</surname>
							<given-names>K. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Differences between U.S. GAAP and IFRS in accounting for goodwill impairment and inventory: Tax treatment under the internal revenue code</article-title>
					<source>Journal of Accounting and Finance</source>
					<volume>18</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>23</fpage>
					<lpage>29</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v18i4.421">https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v18i4.421</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B42">
				<mixed-citation>Serafim, L., &amp; Gomes, L. (2011). Influência da governança corporativa nas ações do setor elétrico brasileiro: uma análise através da medida ômega. Final Report of Pibic. PUC-RJ. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.puc-rio.br/ensinopesq/ccpg/pibic/relatorio_resumo2011/Relatorios/CSS/ADM/ADM-Leonardo%20Soares%20Serafim.pdf">https://www.puc-rio.br/ensinopesq/ccpg/pibic/relatorio_resumo2011/Relatorios/CSS/ADM/ADM-Leonardo%20Soares%20Serafim.pdf</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Serafim</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gomes</surname>
							<given-names>L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2011</year>
					<source>Influência da governança corporativa nas ações do setor elétrico brasileiro: uma análise através da medida ômega</source>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="other">Final Report of Pibic</pub-id>
					<publisher-name>PUC-RJ</publisher-name>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://www.puc-rio.br/ensinopesq/ccpg/pibic/relatorio_resumo2011/Relatorios/CSS/ADM/ADM-Leonardo%20Soares%20Serafim.pdf">https://www.puc-rio.br/ensinopesq/ccpg/pibic/relatorio_resumo2011/Relatorios/CSS/ADM/ADM-Leonardo%20Soares%20Serafim.pdf</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B43">
				<mixed-citation>Shropshire, C. (2010). The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices. Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 246-264.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Shropshire</surname>
							<given-names>C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2010</year>
					<article-title>The role of the interlocking director and board receptivity in the diffusion of practices</article-title>
					<source>Academy of Management Review</source>
					<volume>35</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>246</fpage>
					<lpage>264</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B44">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, D. M. da. (2016). Escolhas contábeis e características de empresas de grande porte na adoção do IFRS em duas etapas: diagnóstico e análise. [Tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto]. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>D. M. da.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>Escolhas contábeis e características de empresas de grande porte na adoção do IFRS em duas etapas: diagnóstico e análise</source>
					<comment content-type="degree">doutorado</comment>
					<publisher-name>Universidade de São Paulo</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Ribeirão Preto</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B45">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, A. H. C., &amp; Barranco, T. M. de S. (2015). Escolhas contábeis: Análise dos métodos de avaliação de estoques antes e após implementação do Ifrs. Revista de Informação Contábil, 9(2), 39-56.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>A. H. C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barranco</surname>
							<given-names>T. M. de S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Escolhas contábeis: Análise dos métodos de avaliação de estoques antes e após implementação do Ifrs</article-title>
					<source>Revista de Informação Contábil</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>39</fpage>
					<lpage>56</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B46">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, D. M., Aversari Martins, V., &amp; Lemes, S. (2016). Escolhas contábeis: Reflexões para a pesquisa. Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade, 13(29), 129-155. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n29p129">https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n29p129</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>D. M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Aversari Martins</surname>
							<given-names>V.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lemes</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Escolhas contábeis: Reflexões para a pesquisa</article-title>
					<source>Revista Contemporânea de Contabilidade</source>
					<volume>13</volume>
					<issue>29</issue>
					<fpage>129</fpage>
					<lpage>155</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n29p129">https://doi.org/10.5007/2175-8069.2016v13n29p129</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B47">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, A. da, Brighenti, J., &amp; Klann, R. C. (2018). Efeitos da convergência às normas contábeis internacionais na relevância da informação contábil de empresas brasileiras. Revista Ambiente Contábil, 10(1), 121-138. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2018v10n1ID11016">https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2018v10n1ID11016</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>A. da</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Brighenti</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Klann</surname>
							<given-names>R. C.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Efeitos da convergência às normas contábeis internacionais na relevância da informação contábil de empresas brasileiras</article-title>
					<source>Revista Ambiente Contábil</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>121</fpage>
					<lpage>138</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2018v10n1ID11016">https://doi.org/10.21680/2176-9036.2018v10n1ID11016</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B48">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, D. M. da, &amp; Martins, V. A. (2015). Escolhas de políticas contábeis nas empresas de grande porte no Brasil XXII Congresso Brasileiro de Custos, Foz do Iguaçu, Brasil.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>D. M. da</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>V. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<source>Escolhas de políticas contábeis nas empresas de grande porte no Brasil</source>
					<conf-name>XXIICongresso Brasileiro de Custos</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>Foz do Iguaçu, Brasil</conf-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B49">
				<mixed-citation>Silva, D. M. da, &amp; Martins, V. A. (2018). Politicas contábeis recomendadas nas normas e escolhas contábeis predominantes em companhias abertas e fechadas no Brasil. Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting, 11(3), 372-390. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2018110301">http://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2018110301</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>D. M. da</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Martins</surname>
							<given-names>V. A.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Politicas contábeis recomendadas nas normas e escolhas contábeis predominantes em companhias abertas e fechadas no Brasil</article-title>
					<source>Advances in Scientific and Applied Accounting</source>
					<volume>11</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>372</fpage>
					<lpage>390</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2018110301">http://doi.org/10.14392/asaa.2018110301</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B50">
				<mixed-citation>Silveira, A. M. (2004). Governança Corporativa e estrutura de propriedade: determinantes e relação com o desempenho das empresas no Brasil. [Tese de doutorado, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo]. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="thesis">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silveira</surname>
							<given-names>A. M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<source>Governança Corporativa e estrutura de propriedade: determinantes e relação com o desempenho das empresas no Brasil</source>
					<comment content-type="degree">doutorado</comment>
					<publisher-name>Universidade de São Paulo</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>São Paulo</publisher-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B51">
				<mixed-citation>Silveira, A. D. M. da, Barros, L. A. B. de C., &amp; Famá, R. (2004). Qualidade da Governança Corporativa no Brasil e os Fatores que a determinam. 28<sup>o</sup> Encontro da ANPAD - ENANPAD, Curitiba.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="confproc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silveira</surname>
							<given-names>A. D. M. da</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Barros</surname>
							<given-names>L. A. B. de C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Famá</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2004</year>
					<source>Qualidade da Governança Corporativa no Brasil e os Fatores que a determinam</source><sup>o</sup><conf-name>28Encontro da ANPAD - ENANPAD</conf-name>
					<conf-loc>Curitiba</conf-loc>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B52">
				<mixed-citation>Silvestre, L. N., &amp; Malaquias, R. F. (2015). Classificação dos juros e dividendos na demonstração dos fluxos de caixa das empresas brasileiras. Revista Ambiente Contábil, 7(2), 119-134.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Silvestre</surname>
							<given-names>L. N.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Malaquias</surname>
							<given-names>R. F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Classificação dos juros e dividendos na demonstração dos fluxos de caixa das empresas brasileiras</article-title>
					<source>Revista Ambiente Contábil</source>
					<volume>7</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>119</fpage>
					<lpage>134</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B53">
				<mixed-citation>Simeon, E. D., &amp; John, O. (2018). Implication of choice of inventory valuation methods on profit, tax and closing inventory. Account and Financial Management Journal, 3(7), 1639-1645. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.31142/afmj/v3i7.05">https://doi.org/10.31142/afmj/v3i7.05</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Simeon</surname>
							<given-names>E. D.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>John</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Implication of choice of inventory valuation methods on profit, tax and closing inventory</article-title>
					<source>Account and Financial Management Journal</source>
					<volume>3</volume>
					<issue>7</issue>
					<fpage>1639</fpage>
					<lpage>1645</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.31142/afmj/v3i7.05">https://doi.org/10.31142/afmj/v3i7.05</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B54">
				<mixed-citation>Souza, F. E. A., Botinha, R. A., Silva, P. R., &amp; Lemes, S. (2015). A comparabilidade das escolhas contábeis na avaliação posterior de propriedades para investimento: Uma análise das companhias abertas brasileiras e portuguesas. Revista Contabilidade &amp; Finanças, 26(68), 154-166. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201500580">https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201500580</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Souza</surname>
							<given-names>F. E. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Botinha</surname>
							<given-names>R. A.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Silva</surname>
							<given-names>P. R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Lemes</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>A comparabilidade das escolhas contábeis na avaliação posterior de propriedades para investimento: Uma análise das companhias abertas brasileiras e portuguesas</article-title>
					<source>Revista Contabilidade &amp; Finanças</source>
					<volume>26</volume>
					<issue>68</issue>
					<fpage>154</fpage>
					<lpage>166</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201500580">https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-057x201500580</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B55">
				<mixed-citation>Wasserman, S., &amp; Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wasserman</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Faust</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1994</year>
					<source>Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications, Structural Analysis in the Social Sciences</source>
					<publisher-name>Cambridge University Press</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B56">
				<mixed-citation>Watts, D. (2003). Small Worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Watts</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2003</year>
					<source>Small Worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness</source>
					<publisher-name>Princeton University Press</publisher-name>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B57">
				<mixed-citation>Watts, R. L. (1992). Accounting choice theory and market-based research in accounting. The British Accounting Review, 24(3), 235-267. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-8389(05)80023-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-8389(05)80023-X</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Watts</surname>
							<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1992</year>
					<article-title>Accounting choice theory and market-based research in accounting</article-title>
					<source>The British Accounting Review</source>
					<volume>24</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>235</fpage>
					<lpage>267</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-8389(05)80023-X">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-8389(05)80023-X</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B58">
				<mixed-citation>Watts, R. L., &amp; Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131-156. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/247880">http://www.jstor.org/stable/247880</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Watts</surname>
							<given-names>R. L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zimmerman</surname>
							<given-names>J. L.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>1990</year>
					<article-title>Positive accounting theory: A ten year perspective</article-title>
					<source>The Accounting Review</source>
					<volume>65</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>131</fpage>
					<lpage>156</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.jstor.org/stable/247880">http://www.jstor.org/stable/247880</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B59">
				<mixed-citation>Wong, L. H. H., Gygax, A. F., &amp; Wang, P. (2015). Board interlocking network and the design of executive compensation packages. Social Networks, 41, 85-100. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.12.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.12.002</ext-link>
				</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wong</surname>
							<given-names>L. H. H.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Gygax</surname>
							<given-names>A. F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2015</year>
					<article-title>Board interlocking network and the design of executive compensation packages</article-title>
					<source>Social Networks</source>
					<volume>41</volume>
					<fpage>85</fpage>
					<lpage>100</lpage>
					<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.12.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2014.12.002</ext-link>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
	<!--<sub-article article-type="translation" id="s1" xml:lang="pt">
		<front-stub>
            <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.15728/bbr.2023.20.1.3.pt</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Artigo</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title><italic>Board Interlocking</italic> e Escolhas Contábeis em Empresas Brasileiras de Energia Elétrica com Ações na Bolsa</article-title>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-3547-9539</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Ribeiro</surname>
						<given-names>Flávio</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff10"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">0000-0002-3998-6263</contrib-id>
					<name>
						<surname>Clemente</surname>
						<given-names>Ademir</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff20"><sup>2</sup></xref>
                    <role content-type="http://credit.niso.org/contributor-roles/methodology/">metodologia</role>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff10">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Irati, Paraná, Brazil</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>Irati</city>
					<state>Paraná</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff20">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidade Federal do Paraná</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<city>Curitiba</city>
					<state>Paraná</state>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="BR">Brazil</country>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c10">
					<label>Email:</label>
					<email>flavioribeiro@unicentro.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<corresp id="c20">
					<label>Email:</label>
					<email>ademir@ufpr.br</email>
				</corresp>
				<fn fn-type="con" id="fn10">
					<label>CONTRIBUIÇÕES DE AUTORIA</label>
					<p><bold>FR:</bold> Introdução, referências, resultados, discussões e conclusões. <bold>AC:</bold> Metodologia, discussões.</p>
				</fn>
				<fn fn-type="conflict" id="fn20">
					<label>CONFLITO DE INTERESSE</label>
					<p> Os autores declaram não ter nenhum conflito de interesse.</p>
				</fn>
			</author-notes>
			<abstract>
				<title>Resumo </title>
				<p>Este artigo tem como objetivo analisar a influência da estabilidade e da intensidade do board interlocking nas escolhas contábeis em companhias do setor de energia elétrica com ações negociadas no Brasil, Bolsa e Balcão (B3), no período 2010-2016. Para isso foi utilizada uma amostra constituída por 59 companhias, das quais 57 apresentaram as informações necessárias para a realização da análise, resultando em 177 diferentes conexões entre as empresas. Como proxies para o board interlocking, empregaram-se a estabilidade e a intensidade das conexões entre os profissionais dos conselhos, e para as escolhas contábeis buscou-se identificar a semelhança entre as escolhas adotadas pelas empresas. Os achados revelam consideráveis mudanças nas estruturas das conexões das companhias, partindo da formação de uma grande rede nos anos de 2010 e 2011, para a constituição de cinco grupos bem definidos em 2016. Os resultados sugerem que a estabilidade e intensidade das conexões favorecem a disseminação das escolhas contábeis, principalmente quando relacionadas a mensuração e classificação. Esses achados convergem com os de Connelly e Slyke (2012) segundo os quais a existência de conselheiros em comum favorece o acesso e a disseminação de informações entre empresas.</p>
			</abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="pt">
				<title>Palavras-chave:</title>
				<kwd>Board Interlocking</kwd>
				<kwd>Estabilidade do Board Interlocking</kwd>
				<kwd>Intensidade do Board Interlocking</kwd>
				<kwd>Escolhas Contábeis</kwd>
				<kwd>Setor de Energia Elétrica</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
		</front-stub>
		<body>
			<sec sec-type="intro">
				<title>1. Introdução</title>
				<p>Conforme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">Baysinger e Butler (1985</xref>), o conselho de administração (CA) é uma parte essencial da estrutura de governança corporativa, auxiliando na resolução de problemas de agência inerentes à gestão das organizações. Embora o principal papel do CA esteja alinhado com a proteção dos interesses dos investidores, estudos recentes têm demonstrado que os membros do CA podem influenciar a tomada de decisão das organizações quando atuam simultaneamente em mais de uma empresa. Esse fenômeno de interligação entre conselheiros é conhecido como board interlocking. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B33">Pfeffer e Salancik (1978</xref>) afirmam que, quando a organização nomeia um profissional para integrar seu conselho de administração, espera que esse conselheiro propicie recursos para ajudar a empresa a se desenvolver. Sugerem que a adoção do board interlocking pode proporcionar vários benefícios para a entidade, como: i) fornecimento de recursos específicos, ii) auxílio na obtenção de apoio de importantes elementos externos à empresa, iii) legitimação, e iv) criação de um canal de comunicação entre as organizações.</p>
				<p>Com relação à criação de um canal de comunicação entre as organizações, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Connelly e Van Slyke (2012</xref>) afirmam que a existência de conselheiros em comum em diferentes empresas favorece o acesso e a disseminação de informações. Estudos empíricos têm investigado essa prerrogativa sobre as mais variadas práticas corporativas, tais como: compensação de diretores (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Addy et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Balsam et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B7">Boivie et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Crespí-Cladera &amp; Pascual-Fuster, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B25">Kim et al., 2015</xref>), operações de fusões e aquisições (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Cai &amp; Sevilir, 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">El-Khatib et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B38">Renneboog &amp; Zhao, 2013</xref>), investimentos em pesquisa e desenvolvimento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Helmers et al., 2017</xref>), reputação corporativa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chandler et al., 2013</xref>), gerenciamento de resultados (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chiu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ribeiro &amp; Colauto, 2016</xref>). </p>
				<p>Perceptivelmente, a literatura é convergente sob a perspectiva de que o acesso e a disseminação de práticas contábeis podem ser facilitados pelo board interlocking. Todavia, nenhum desses estudos se concentra nas escolhas do método contábil. Na verdade, de uma perspectiva de informação, a literatura indica que os métodos contábeis são selecionados para revelar informações e previsões sobre os fluxos de caixa futuros da empresa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B24">Holthausen &amp; Leftwich, 1983</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B58">Watts &amp; Zimmerman, 1990</xref>). Assim, os métodos contábeis são relevantes para os valores da empresa e impactam os fluxos de caixa futuros (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Han et al., 2017</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B23">Holthausen (1990</xref>) sugere que se os profissionais do conselho trazem vantagem comparativa no acesso a recursos e na obtenção de informações para suas empresas, eles terão mais poder e influência sobre a estimativa dos fluxos de caixa futuros das empresas. Portanto, a escolha dos métodos contábeis é uma decisão muito importante tomada pelos membros do conselho. Tais profissionais usam as escolhas de métodos contábeis para sinalizar sua visão sobre as perspectivas futuras de suas empresas e melhorar a confiabilidade e relevância da informação contábil (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Han et al., 2017</xref>). </p>
				<p>Diante disso, entende-se que a presença de conselheiros em comum em duas ou mais empresas pode também influenciar a decisão sobre as escolhas contábeis das organizações. Isso tende a ocorrer com maior ênfase quando as conexões se apresentam estáveis e intensas. Considerando o que foi exposto, este artigo tem como objetivo analisar a influência da estabilidade e da intensidade do board interlocking sobre as escolhas contábeis em companhias do segmento de energia elétrica com ações negociadas na B3, no período 2010-2016.</p>
				<p>De acordo com <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Silveira (2004</xref>), o Brasil se caracteriza como uma economia com alta concentração de propriedade, assim o papel do conselho de administração destaca-se por minimizar os custos de agência entre controladores e minoritários. </p>
				<p>Ademais, especificamente no segmento elétrico brasileiro, verifica-se a ocorrência de uma reestruturação nos últimos anos, devido à elevada demanda de distribuição e produção de energia elétrica, convergindo na maior participação da iniciativa privada (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B42">Serafim, 2011</xref>). As características peculiares do Brasil e do segmento de energia elétrica representam um fértil solo de pesquisas no campo das finanças.</p>
				<p>O termo estabilidade aqui indica a capacidade de as ligações entre os conselhos de administração tornarem-se duradouras ao longo do tempo. Essa estabilidade das conexões pode favorecer o fluxo de informações entre as organizações, auxiliando a disseminação de práticas corporativas. Por outro lado, a intensidade refere-se à magnitude com que as ligações são realizadas. Assim, a presença de um membro do conselho atuando em duas organizações tem uma intensidade inferior à de dois ou mais membros conectados.</p>
				<p>Em termos de originalidade, uma importante contribuição para os estudos financeiros é a proposta de uma nova metodologia para mensurar as conexões entre os membros do CA. A maioria dos estudos tem adotado variáveis de redes sociais e inclusão de dummies para representar o board interlocking. Tais variáveis apresentam consideráveis limitações, como o fato de a análise de redes sociais corresponder a uma representação estática do comportamento social das organizações e, no caso da utilização de dummy, a atribuição de valores dicotômicos subvaloriza o impacto do compartilhamento de mais de um membro do conselho de administração. A utilização do conceito de estabilidade e intensidade das conexões tem como propósito ampliar as discussões sobre o papel dos membros do conselho no contento organizacional e explicar como determinadas práticas, mais especificamente as escolhas contábeis, podem ser disseminadas entre as organizações. </p>
				<p>Como um dos principais resultados encontrados, observa-se empiricamente que a estabilidade e a intensidade das conexões favorecem a disseminação das escolhas contábeis, principalmente quando relacionadas à mensuração e classificação. Esses achados convergem com os de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Connelly e Slyke (2012</xref>) para quem a existência de conselheiros em comum em diferentes empresas favorece o acesso e a disseminação de informações.</p>
				<p>Este artigo compreende, além desta introdução, quatro outras seções: Fundamentação Teórica, Metodologia, Análise e discussão dos resultados e Conclusão.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>2. Fundamentação Teórica</title>
				<p>Esta seção compreende os conceitos e a fundamentação teórica pertinentes.</p>
				<sec>
					<title><italic>2.1. Estabilidade e Intensidade do Board Interlocking</italic></title>
					<p>
						<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B17">Fich e White (2005</xref>) entendem que o board interlocking se caracteriza pela presença de um profissional que ocupa a posição de conselheiro em duas ou mais empresas. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mizruchi (1996</xref>) afirma que tal fenômeno ocorre quando uma pessoa afiliada a uma organização participa do conselho administrativo de outra organização. Portanto, o board interlocking pode ser entendido como um fenômeno em que os membros do conselho de uma empresa participam do núcleo de decisões em outro conselho, estabelecendo uma ligação entre as organizações. </p>
					<p>Por um longo período, as redes interligadas de conselhos representaram um fenômeno contencioso, porque se acredita que elas comprometem a eficácia da governança corporativa. De fato, é razoável duvidar de que os conselheiros, que devem exercer diferentes papéis em diferentes conselhos, possam efetivamente agir no interesse de todas as empresas que atendem (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B28">Mizruchi, 1996</xref>). Todavia, é prudente supor, também, que ter profissionais com assento nos conselhos de outras empresas pode facilitar o compartilhamento de informações, experiências e outras técnicas. Isso pode ocorrer de forma mais evidente quando as conexões apresentam características de estabilidade e a intensidade.</p>
					<p>A análise de redes sociais permite identificar detalhadamente os padrões de relacionamento entre atores em uma determinada situação social (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B27">Marques, 1999</xref>). O princípio básico da análise de redes é que a estrutura das relações sociais determina o conteúdo dessas relações. Os teóricos das redes rejeitam a noção de que as pessoas são combinações de atributos, ou de que as instituições são entidades estáticas com limites claramente definidos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mizruchi, 2006</xref>). </p>
					<p>O foco da análise de redes sociais está no estudo da estrutura dos grupos sociais, buscando identificar as relações entre os atores dos grupos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B55">Wasserman &amp; Faust, 1994</xref>). Por muito tempo, uma crítica frequente à análise de rede era de que seus proponentes tiveram sucesso na criação de descrições matemáticas elegantes das estruturas sociais, mas não foram tão bem-sucedidos na demonstração de que tais estruturas tenham, realmente, consequências comportamentais. Em nenhuma área essas críticas foram tão enfáticas quanto na do estudo das relações entre organizações. Embora alguns dos primeiros estudos tenham demonstrado que a centralidade nas redes entre organizações estaria associada a resultados organizacionais identificáveis, inclusive a probabilidade de sucesso político de uma organização (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B19">Galaskiewicz, 1979</xref>) e suas estratégias de investimento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B36">Ratcliff, 1980</xref>), tais demonstrações foram pouco numerosas até meados da década de 1980. Desde então, proliferaram estudos os quais sugerem que a posição de uma empresa nas redes influencia o seu comportamento (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B29">Mizruchi, 2006</xref>). </p>
					<p>Um dos pontos mais importantes a respeito da análise de redes sociais é seu papel como representação. As redes sociais de um sistema complexo como uma sociedade, geralmente representa uma fotografia da estrutura em um dado momento, e não um filme (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B37">Recuero et al., 2015</xref>). Portanto, é preciso compreender que dificilmente uma representação estática dará conta da complexidade social (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B56">Watts, 2003</xref>).</p>
					<p>Críticas mais severas são realizadas para a utilização de dummies para representar o board interlocking. Há grande perda de informação em atribuir valores dicotômicos para as conexões, subvalorizando suas características implícitas, por exemplo, o fato de o impacto ser diferente conforme duas empresas apresentem compartilhamento de apenas um conselheiro, dois ou mais. Porém, pela lógica da utilização da dummy, o mesmo valor seria atribuído para ambos os casos. </p>
					<p>Diante dessas críticas à operacionalização do board interlocking, o presente estudo considera duas variáveis para caracterizar as conexões entre conselhos: (i) Estabilidade; e (ii) Intensidade. O termo estabilidade deriva do latim stabilĭtas e significa a qualidade de estável, que mantém o equilíbrio (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ferreira, 1986</xref>). Com enfoque na formação do board interlocking, estabilidade pode ser entendida como a capacidade de as ligações entre os Conselhos de Administração tornarem-se estáveis ao longo do tempo. Por exemplo, a estabilidade entre duas empresas com ligações ininterruptas durante certo período é maior que entre outras duas empresas que possuem ligações em um ano e em outro não. Entende-se que essa estabilidade entre as organizações pode favorecer o fluxo de informações entre elas auxiliando a disseminação de práticas corporativas, pressuposto esse a ser testado neste estudo.</p>
					<p>Outra característica relevante que as pesquisas sobre board interlocking têm deixado de lado é a intensidade das conexões realizadas. Conceitualmente, intensidade refere-se a uma característica atribuída a algo ou alguém que se apresenta em grandes proporções. Normalmente, essa característica está relacionada com o fato de algo se manifestar ou se fazer sentir com força, vigor, de algo que é intenso (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Ferreira, 1986</xref>).</p>
					<p>Sob a ótica da constituição do board interlocking, a intensidade remete à magnitude com que as ligações são realizadas. Assim, a presença de um membro do conselho atuando em duas organizações tem uma intensidade inferior à de dois ou mais membros conectados.</p>
					<p>Nota-se que as características de estabilidade e intensidade são ainda inéditas em estudos sobre as conexões organizacionais. Isso pode representar uma contribuição importante sobre os efeitos do board interlocking.</p>
				</sec>
				<sec>
					<title>2.2. Escolhas contábeis e processo de convergência</title>
					<p>Conceitualmente, entende-se por escolha contábil qualquer decisão cujo objetivo seja influenciar os resultados da Contabilidade, incluindo não apenas as demonstrações contábeis em si, mas também quaisquer outras informações e documentos derivados da Contabilidade (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fields et al., 2001</xref>). Escolhas contábeis abrangem decisões dos gestores por determinado procedimento de mensuração, reconhecimento e divulgação em detrimento de outro, quando há mais de um procedimento igualmente aceito de acordo com as melhores práticas contábeis (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B57">Watts, 1992</xref>)</p>
					<p>No Brasil, o processo de convergência às normas internacionais se iniciou com as alterações da Lei nº. 6.404/76 promovidas pelas Leis nº. 11.638/07 e nº. 11.941/09. Desde a publicação da Lei nº. 11.638/07, o Comitê de Pronunciamentos Contábeis (CPC) tem sido o principal órgão elaborador das normas contábeis brasileiras emitidas em consonância com as normas produzidas pelo IASB (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B47">Silva et al., 2018</xref>). </p>
					<p>A adoção de um padrão contábil passível de oferecer uma linguagem de divulgação que atenda às necessidades de todas as empresas em todos os mercados é uma tarefa difícil, porque o nível de desenvolvimento dos mercados globais é diferente em questões como proteção ao investidor ou ao credor, regulação e enforcement (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B18">Fields et al., 2001</xref>). Para <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B31">Nobes (2006</xref>, 2013) há fatores que contribuem para as diferenças na divulgação das informações contábeis. Esses fatores foram classificados como overt options (opções observáveis) e covert options (opções não observáveis), como mostrado na <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f10">Figura 1</xref>. </p>
					<p>
						<fig id="f10">
							<label>Figura 1.</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Tipos de escolhas contábeis</title>
							</caption>
							<graphic xlink:href="1808-2386-bbr-20-01-38-gf10.jpg"/>
							<attrib>Fonte: adaptado de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B48">Silva e Martins (2015</xref>)</attrib>
						</fig>
					</p>
					<p>Entende-se como escolhas contábeis overt options aquelas provenientes de critérios de mensuração, evidenciação, classificação, bem como escolhas em estágios de adoção de normas. Essas escolhas são identificadas facilmente nos relatórios contábeis. As covert options, por outro lado, são decorrentes das decisões operacionais de gestores, assim como lacunas deixadas pelas normas contábeis e envolvem julgamento profissional (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B46">Silva et al., 2016</xref>). </p>
					<p>Com a adoção das IFRS, a contabilidade iniciou um processo de transição de uma contabilidade baseada em regras para uma contabilidade baseada em princípios, a fim de melhorar a representação da situação econômico-financeira das empresas, o que fez com que aumentasse o subjetivismo advindo do julgamento profissional (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">Bennett et al., 2006</xref>). Esse subjetivismo presente na aplicação das IFRS é proporcionado pela sua flexibilidade e proporciona escolhas contábeis.</p>
					<p>Com o advento da convergência às normas contábeis internacionais, as flexibilidades das decisões a respeito das escolhas contábeis passaram por mudanças, as quais compreendem critérios de mensuração, reconhecimento, classificação e evidenciação: Em relação aos critérios de mensuração, destacam-se, a (i) propriedade para investimento; (ii) ajuste a valor presente dos elementos do ativo e do passivo em curto prazo; e (iii) estoques. No tocante ao reconhecimento, há de se observar: (i) métodos de depreciação dos imobilizados; (ii) métodos de amortização dos intangíveis; e (iii) instrumentos financeiros. Quanto à classificação, encontram-se os elementos da Demonstração dos Fluxos de Caixa (DFC): (i) juros pagos; (ii) dividendos e juros sobre capital próprio pagos; (iii) juros recebidos; e (iv) dividendos e juros sobre capital próprio recebidos. Por fim, os critérios de evidenciação: (i) Demonstração dos Fluxos de Caixa; (ii) Demonstração de Resultado Abrangente; (iii) outros resultados abrangentes.</p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="methods">
				<title>3. Metodologia</title>
				<p>Da perspectiva teórica, tem-se um estudo positivista que se propõe a averiguar de forma empírica a estabilidade e intensidade das conexões entre as companhias a partir do CA (direta) e seu relacionamento com as decisões sobre as escolhas contábeis (indireta).</p>
				<p>A amostra se restringiu às empresas brasileiras do setor de energia elétrica que apresentam ligações com outra companhia por meio dos profissionais do CA e que evidenciam as informações necessárias para a identificação das escolhas contábeis no período de 2010 a 2016, totalizando 7 anos. Esse setor apresenta características peculiares, como um elevado nível de conexões, o que pode contribuir para o entendimento das técnicas empregadas. O setor de energia elétrica da B3 é constituído por 59 companhias, das quais 57 apresentaram as informações necessárias para a realização da análise, resultando em 177 diferentes conexões entre as empresas. As duas companhias excluídas não apresentavam informações para todo o período do estudo. </p>
				<sec>
					<title>3.1. Variáveis e Modelo de Análise</title>
					<p>Para obtenção das variáveis referentes às escolhas contábeis, foram realizadas duas etapas. Na primeira foram identificadas as normas que apresentam diferentes opções para mensuração, reconhecimento, classificação e evidenciação das informações contábeis. Na segunda etapa, após a identificação das normas, foi realizado um mapeamento nos relatórios contábeis das escolhas contábeis adotadas pelas empresas da amostra. </p>
					<p>Na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t10">Tabela 1</xref> são apresentados os itens que compõem a métrica de semelhança das escolhas contábeis. Os itens foram obtidos a partir de estudos de (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2">Andrade et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B21">Han et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B26">Maciel et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B30">Moreira et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B34">Pinto et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B40">Scherer et al., 2012</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B41">Sedki et al., 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B45">Silva &amp; Barranco, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B49">Silva &amp; Martins, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B52">Silvestre &amp; Malaquias, 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B53">Simeon &amp; John, 2018</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B54">Souza et al., 2015</xref>).</p>
					<p>
						<table-wrap id="t10">
							<label>Tabela 1.</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Métrica de Escolhas Contábeis</title>
							</caption>
							<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
								<colgroup>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
								</colgroup>
								<thead>
									<tr>
										<th align="center"> </th>
										<th align="center">Itens</th>
										<th align="center">Valores</th>
										<th align="center">Fonte</th>
									</tr>
								</thead>
								<tbody>
                                    <tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="6"><bold>Escolhas Contábeis de Mensuração</bold></td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">PPI</td>
										<td align="center">Custo histórico (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 28</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Valor Justo (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Clientes/Fornecedores - AVP - Curto Prazo</td>
										<td align="center">Sim (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 12</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Não (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Estoques</td>
										<td align="center">PEPS (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 16</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Custo Médio (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="6"><bold>Escolhas contábeis de Reconhecimento</bold></td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Depreciação</td>
										<td align="center">Linear somente (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 27</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Outros (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Amortização - Intangível (vida útil definida)</td>
										<td align="center">Linear somente (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 04</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Outros (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Instrumento Financeiro</td>
										<td align="center">Resultado (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 38, 39, 40</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">PL (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="8"><bold>Escolhas contábeis de Classificação</bold></td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2"> Juros pagos</td>
										<td align="center">FC Operacional (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">FC Financiamentos (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Dividendos e JSCP pagos</td>
										<td align="center">FC Operacional (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">FC Financiamentos (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Juros recebidos</td>
										<td align="center">FC Operacional (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">FC Investimento (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Dividendos e JSCP recebidos</td>
										<td align="center">FC Operacional (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">FC Investimento (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="6"><bold>Escolhas contábeis de Evidenciação</bold></td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">FCO</td>
										<td align="center">Método direto (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 03</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Método indireto (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">DRA</td>
										<td align="center">Na DMPL (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 26</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Em relatório próprio (0)</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">Outros Resultados Abrangentes</td>
										<td align="center">Líquidos dos tributos (1)</td>
										<td align="center" rowspan="2">CPC 26</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Antes dos tributos (0)</td>
									</tr>
								</tbody>
							</table>
							<table-wrap-foot>
								<fn id="TFN14">
									<p>Fonte: elaborado pelos autores (2020).</p>
								</fn>
							</table-wrap-foot>
						</table-wrap>
					</p>
					<p>Para a métrica de semelhança das escolhas contábeis, cada item recebeu a valoração dicotômica, 0 ou 1. Posteriormente, os valores obtidos pelas empresas individualmente foram comparados com os das outras empresas com as quais mantêm ligação. No caso de valores iguais, foi atribuído valor 1 (um), e para valores divergentes, 0 (zero). Na sequência, os itens de cada classificação: mensuração, reconhecimento, classificação e evidenciação foram somados e divididos pelo total de cada classificação. Por exemplo, para o campo de mensuração, o máximo dos itens será 6 (seis), nesse caso, após o comparativo com a empresa da conexão, se o valor resultar 4 (quatro), o valor para essa variável será 4/6 ou 0,67. Os valores assim calculados podem variar entre 0 e 1 e, por isso adotou-se Regressão Logit.</p>
					<p>Para determinar os valores das variáveis de escolhas contábeis, a amostra foi separada em três parte, sendo a parte intermediária retirada da amostra e adotando valor 1 (um) para os escores do tercil superior, e 0 (zero) para os escores do tercil inferior.</p>
					<p>Como variáveis independentes da pesquisa, utilizaram-se a estabilidade e a intensidade do board interlocking. Entende-se por estabilidade a capacidade das conexões apresentarem constância durante os anos, ou seja, a manutenção da presença dos membros do conselho entre as companhias. </p>
					<p>Para identificar a estabilidade das ligações, primeiramente foi acessado o Formulário de Referência de cada uma das companhias listadas na B3. Na sequência, foi consultado o item 12, que se refere à Assembleia e administração no subitem 5/6 que especifica a composição e experiência profissional da administração e do conselho fiscal. Nesse local, são identificados os nomes de todos os membros componentes da diretoria, CA e conselho fiscal da companhia.</p>
					<p> Os nomes dos profissionais com seus respectivos CPFs foram tabulados com o auxílio de planilha de Excel, procedimento realizado para cada ano do estudo. Posteriormente, foi aplicado um filtro para identificar os profissionais que atuam simultaneamente em duas ou mais companhias, constituindo o board interlocking.</p>
					<p>Durante a coleta, foram identificadas as conexões estabelecidas entre as companhias, algumas com duração de apenas um ano, e outras que se tornaram constantes durante todo o período analisado.</p>
					<p>Como variáveis de controle, empregou-se a classificação de empresas em estatais e privadas, o nível de Governança Corporativa e a presença de ADRs. Para identificar a presença de empresas estatais, utilizou-se uma dummy, que recebeu valor 1 (um) caso a empresa seja estatal e caso contrário, 0 (zero), conforme estudo de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B10">Camilo, Marcon, e Bandeira-de-Mello (2012</xref>).</p>
					<p>A variável referente ao nível de Governança Corporativa segrega as companhias que participam dos níveis N1 e Novo Mercado diferenciados de governança corporativa daqueles que possuem outra classificação. </p>
					<p>Por último, empregou-se a presença de ADRs como variável de controle. Conforme <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Silveira et al. (2004</xref>), as empresas que apresentam ADRs receberam o valor de 1 (um), e foi atribuído 0 (zero) para as companhias que não possuem.</p>
					<p>Na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t20">Tabela 2</xref>, estão descritas as variáveis de pesquisa e suas definições operacionais.</p>
					<p>
						<table-wrap id="t20">
							<label>Tabela 2.</label>
							<caption>
								<title>Resumo das variáveis da pesquisa</title>
							</caption>
							<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
								<colgroup>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
									<col/>
								</colgroup>
								<thead>
									<tr>
										<th align="center">Constructo</th>
										<th align="center">Nome da Variável</th>
										<th align="center">Sigla</th>
										<th align="center">Classificação</th>
										<th align="center">Definição Operacional</th>
										<th align="center">Forma de Mensuração</th>
									</tr>
								</thead>
								<tbody>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="4"><bold>Escolhas Contábeis</bold></td>
										<td align="center">Escolhas Contábeis de Mensuração</td>
										<td align="center">ECM</td>
										<td align="center">Dependente</td>
										<td align="left" rowspan="4">Valor obtido a partir da Métrica de Escolhas Contábeis</td>
										<td align="left" rowspan="4">Foi atribuído valor 1 (um) quando a média entre os escores obtidos da Métrica de Escolhas Contábeis para o ano de 2010 e 2016 foi superior a 0,50 e valor 0 (zero), caso, a média apresente valor inferior a 0,50.</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Escolhas Contábeis de Reconhecimento</td>
										<td align="center">ECR</td>
										<td align="center">Dependente</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Escolhas Contábeis de Classificação</td>
										<td align="center">ECC</td>
										<td align="center">Dependente</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Escolhas Contábeis de Evidenciação</td>
										<td align="center">ECE</td>
										<td align="center">Dependente</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="3"><bold><italic>Board interlocking</italic></bold></td>
										<td align="center">Estabilidade</td>
										<td align="center">ESTAB</td>
										<td align="center">Independente</td>
										<td align="left">Identifica a estabilidade das conexões constituídas.</td>
										<td align="left">Mensurada a partir da razão entre o número de anos com ligações e o total possível</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Intensidade</td>
										<td align="center">INTENS</td>
										<td align="center">Independente</td>
										<td align="left">Evidencia a intensidade das ligações.</td>
										<td align="left">Representado pela média de conexões estabelecidas durante o período analisado</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Estabilidade e Intensidade</td>
										<td align="center">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
										<td align="center">Independente</td>
										<td align="left">Métrica multiplicativa de que detecta a associação da estabilidade e intensidade.</td>
										<td align="left">Resultante da multiplicação entre estabilidade e intensidade</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center" rowspan="3"><bold>Controle</bold></td>
										<td align="center">Empresas Públicas</td>
										<td align="center">EP</td>
										<td align="center">Controle</td>
										<td align="left">Determina se a empresa é pública ou privada.</td>
										<td align="left">Se for empresa pública adota: 1; se não: 0</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Níveis de Governança Corporativa</td>
										<td align="center">NGC</td>
										<td align="center">Controle</td>
										<td align="left">Trata-se do nível de governança corporativa adotada pela empresa.</td>
										<td align="left">Se possuí NCG adota: 1; se não: 0</td>
									</tr>
									<tr>
										<td align="center">Emissão de ADRs</td>
										<td align="center">ADR</td>
										<td align="center">Controle</td>
										<td align="left">Identifica se a empresa adota ADRs.</td>
										<td align="left">Se possuí ADRs adota: 1; se não: 0</td>
									</tr>
								</tbody>
							</table>
							<table-wrap-foot>
								<fn id="TFN15">
									<p>Fonte: elaborado pelos autores (2020).</p>
								</fn>
							</table-wrap-foot>
						</table-wrap>
					</p>
					<p>Com base nas variáveis definidas na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t20">Tabela 2</xref>, são apresentados os modelos para estimação da influência da estabilidade e intensidade da formação do board interlocking nas escolhas contábeis.</p>
                    <p>
	<disp-formula id="e10">
    <mml:math id="m10" display="block">           
<mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>M</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>_</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>
     <label>(1)</label> 
    </disp-formula>
</p>
    <p>
	<disp-formula id="e20">
    <mml:math id="m20" display="block">           
<mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>_</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>
     <label>(2)</label> 
    </disp-formula>
</p>
                    <p>
	<disp-formula id="e30">
    <mml:math id="m30" display="block">           
<mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>_</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>
     <label>(3)</label> 
    </disp-formula>
</p>
                    <p>
	<disp-formula id="e40">
    <mml:math id="m40" display="block">           
<mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>α</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>B</mml:mi><mml:mo>_</mml:mo><mml:mi>I</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>T</mml:mi><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>S</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>E</mml:mi><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>N</mml:mi><mml:mi>G</mml:mi><mml:mi>C</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>β</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mn>6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msub><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mi>D</mml:mi><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo>+</mml:mo><mml:mi> </mml:mi><mml:msub><mml:mrow><mml:mi>ε</mml:mi></mml:mrow><mml:mrow><mml:mi>i</mml:mi><mml:mi>t</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:msub></mml:math>
     <label>(4)</label> 
    </disp-formula>
</p>
					<p>Em que, </p>
					<p>ECM - Escolhas contábeis de Mensuração </p>
					<p>ECR - Escolhas contábeis de Reconhecimento</p>
					<p>ECC - Escolhas contábeis de Classificação</p>
					<p>ECE - Escolhas contábeis de Evidenciação</p>
					<p>ESTAB - Estabilidade das ligações</p>
					<p>INTENS - Intensidade das ligações </p>
					<p>ESTAB_INTENS - Estabilidade e Intensidade das ligações</p>
					<p>EP - Entidades Públicas </p>
					<p>NGC - Nível de Governança Corporativa </p>
					<p>ADR - Presença de ADRs </p>
					<p>ε - erro residual</p>
					<p>Para o tratamento dos dados, empregou-se a Análise de Regressão Logit. A Regressão foi utilizada para testar os efeitos da estabilidade e da intensidade do board interlocking na semelhança das escolhas contábeis. </p>
				</sec>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
				<title>4. Análise e discussão dos Resultados</title>
				<p>O panorama das conexões entre as empresas revela consideráveis mudanças nas estruturas da rede, partindo da formação de uma grande rede nos anos de 2010 e 2011 para a constituição de cinco grupos bem definidos em 2016. O setor de energia elétrica apresenta nove grupos de empresas bem definidos. Esses grupos apresentaram estabilidade nas conexões durante os sete anos analisados. Entre as conexões estáveis, notam-se as conexões constituídas pela Cemig, Light e Teasa, bem como a rede de energia do Nordeste formada pelas empresas Consern, Termopernanbuco, Elektro Redes, Itapebi, Coelba, Afluente, Neoenergia e Uptick, que representam o maior volume de companhias interligadas.</p>
				<p>Os resultados da análise descritiva das variáveis são apresentados na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t30">Tabela 3</xref>.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t30">
						<label>Tabela 3.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Análise descritiva das variáveis<sup>1</sup></title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Variáveis</th>
									<th align="center">Mínimo</th>
									<th align="center">Máximo</th>
									<th align="center">Média</th>
									<th align="center">DP</th>
									<th align="center">CV</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">INTENS</td>
									<td align="center">0,14</td>
									<td align="center">47,29</td>
									<td align="center">3,98</td>
									<td align="center">7,27</td>
									<td align="center">1,83</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">ESTAB</td>
									<td align="center">0,14</td>
									<td align="center">1,00</td>
									<td align="center">0,60</td>
									<td align="center">0,36</td>
									<td align="center">0,59</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">INTENS_ESTAB</td>
									<td align="center">0,02</td>
									<td align="center">47,29</td>
									<td align="center">3,71</td>
									<td align="center">7,34</td>
									<td align="center">1,98</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">ECM<sup>2</sup></td>
									<td align="center">0,85</td>
									<td align="center">1,00</td>
									<td align="center">0,85</td>
									<td align="center">0,17</td>
									<td align="center">0,20</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">ECR<sup>2</sup></td>
									<td align="center">0,78</td>
									<td align="center">1,00</td>
									<td align="center">0,78</td>
									<td align="center">0,18</td>
									<td align="center">0,23</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">ECC<sup>2</sup></td>
									<td align="center">0,79</td>
									<td align="center">1,00</td>
									<td align="center">0,79</td>
									<td align="center">0,15</td>
									<td align="center">0,19</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">ECE<sup>2</sup></td>
									<td align="center">0,84</td>
									<td align="center">1,00</td>
									<td align="center">0,84</td>
									<td align="center">0,13</td>
									<td align="center">0,15</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">ADR</td>
									<td align="center">0,00</td>
									<td align="center">1,00</td>
									<td align="center">0,30</td>
									<td align="center">0,46</td>
									<td align="center">1,53</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">NGC</td>
									<td align="center">0,00</td>
									<td align="center">1,00</td>
									<td align="center">0,64</td>
									<td align="center">0,48</td>
									<td align="center">0,75</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left">EP</td>
									<td align="center">0,00</td>
									<td align="center">1,00</td>
									<td align="center">0,35</td>
									<td align="center">0,48</td>
									<td align="center">1,37</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN16">
								<p>Fonte: elaborado pelos autores (2020).</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN17">
								<p>Notas: (1) INTENS: Intensidade das Conexões; ESTAB: Estabilidade das Conexões; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensidade multiplicada pela Estabilidade das Conexões; ECM: Escolhas Contábeis de Mensuração; ECR: Escolhas Contábeis de Reconhecimento; ECC: Escolhas Contábeis de Classificação; ECE: Escolhas Contábeis de Evidenciação; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Nível de Governança Corporativa; e EP: Empresas Públicas. (2) Valores dicotomizados conforme subseção 3.1.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>Os achados da estatística descritiva indicam que a intensidade média das conexões varia em torno de quatro membros em cada ligação, todavia nota-se que há um elevado desvio-padrão na amostra, o que sugere a presença de números heterogêneos de ligações, ou seja, enquanto há empresas com mais de quarenta membros em comum, há outras ligações com somente um profissional.</p>
				<p>No tocante à estabilidade, constata-se que a maioria das conexões tem duração superior a 4 anos (0,60 x 7 anos = 4,2 anos). Esse resultado indica que as conexões entre as empresas do setor de energia elétrica são, em geral, estáveis e a apresentarem poucas oscilações, conforme observado na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t30">Tabela 3</xref>.</p>
				<p> Com relação aos índices de escolhas contábeis, verifica-se que os escores são similares entre as empresas que compõem as ligações, sendo tais semelhanças mais elevadas nas escolhas contábeis de mensuração (0,85) e evidenciação (0,84). </p>
				<p>Os resultados associados às variáveis de controle indicam que as companhias, em sua maioria, não possuem títulos negociados nas bolsas americanas (ADRs), visto que a média foi inferior a 0,5. Ademais, percebe-se uma predominância de companhias privadas nesse setor com participação nos níveis diferenciados de governança corporativa. </p>
				<p>Foram testadas as hipóteses da pesquisa com os resultados mostrados nas <xref ref-type="table" rid="t40">Tabelas 4</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t50">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="table" rid="t60">6</xref>, e <xref ref-type="table" rid="t70">7</xref>. </p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t40">
						<label>Tabela 4.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Análise de Regressão Logit - Variável dependente: ECM</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Variáveis</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#1</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#2</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#3</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#4</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#5</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#6</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
                                <tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Variáveis Independentes</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB</td>
									<td align="center">0,3144</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">1,610***</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">1,143</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">2,941</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">INTENS</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,020</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,005</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,841</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,155</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,020</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,060**</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,839</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">2,251</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Variáveis de Controle</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">EP</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-2,265***</td>
									<td align="center">-2,541***</td>
									<td align="center">-2,533***</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-4,144</td>
									<td align="center">-4,494</td>
									<td align="center">-4,188</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ADR</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,455</td>
									<td align="center">-0,183</td>
									<td align="center">-0,304</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,846</td>
									<td align="center">-0,321</td>
									<td align="center">-0,547</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">NGC</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,541</td>
									<td align="center">-0,425</td>
									<td align="center">0,315</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">1,314</td>
									<td align="center">-0,845</td>
									<td align="center">0,738</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Média da Variável Dependente</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Erro-Padrão da Regressão</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0,499</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,448</td>
									<td align="center">0,416</td>
									<td align="center">0,437</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN18">
								<p>Fonte: elaborado pelos autores (2020).</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN19">
								<p>Nota: ***, **, * indicam nível de significância inferior a 1%, 5% e 10%, respectivamente. INTENS: Intensidade das Conexões; ESTAB: Estabilidade das Conexões; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensidade multiplicada pela Estabilidade das Conexões; ECM: Escolhas Contábeis de Mensuração; ECR: Escolhas Contábeis de Reconhecimento; ECC: Escolhas Contábeis de Classificação; ECE: Escolhas Contábeis de Evidenciação; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Nível de Governança Corporativa; e EP: Empresas Públicas. O Modelo#1 é representado pela variável de Estabilidade (ESTAB). O Modelo#2, investiga a relação com a variável Intensidade (INTENS). No Modelo#3 verifica-se a influência da variável multiplicativa Estabilidade x Intensidade (ESTAB_INTENS). O Modelo#4 emprega as variáveis de controle Empresas Públicas (EP), Nível de Governança Corporativa (NGC) e American Depositary Receipt (ADR). No Modelo#5, realiza-se a análise com as variáveis de controle e as variáveis de Estabilidade e intensidade. Por último, o Modelo#6 emprega as variáveis de controle e a variável multiplicativa ESTAB_INTENS.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>As escolhas contábeis de mensuração descrevem as escolhas a respeito de qual método a companhia adota para avaliar determinado evento econômico (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B44">Silva, 2016</xref>). Os resultados indicam que as escolhas contábeis de mensuração são influenciadas significativamente (p &lt; 0,01) pela estabilidade das conexões entre os conselhos. Isso sugere que o número de profissionais atuando simultaneamente no conselho de administração tende a favorecer a disseminação de escolhas relacionadas à mensuração de propriedade para investimento, ajuste a valor presente e mensuração dos estoques.</p>
				<p>Ademais, percebe-se que as ECMs também são influenciadas pela origem do capital próprio das companhias. Os achados indicam que as empresas com origem de capital privado tendem a apresentar maior similaridade entre as práticas contábeis.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t50">
						<label>Tabela 5.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Análise de Regressão Logit - Variável dependente: ECR</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Variáveis</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#1</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#2</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#3</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#4</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#5</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#6</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
                                <tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Variáveis Independentes</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB</td>
									<td align="center">-0,143 </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-1,027**</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">-0,534 </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-2,136</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">INTENS</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,008</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,022</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,392</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,730</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,009</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,020</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,427</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,876</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Variáveis de Controle</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">EP</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,097</td>
									<td align="center">-0,019</td>
									<td align="center">-0,039</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,233</td>
									<td align="center">-0,044</td>
									<td align="center">-0,093</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ADR</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,424</td>
									<td align="center">0,305</td>
									<td align="center">0,392</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,892</td>
									<td align="center">0,632</td>
									<td align="center">0,820</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">NGC</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,343</td>
									<td align="center">0,847*</td>
									<td align="center">0,390</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,938</td>
									<td align="center">1,957</td>
									<td align="center">1,050</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Média da Variável Dependente</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0,500 </td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Erro Padrão da Regressão</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0,501 </td>
									<td align="center">0,501</td>
									<td align="center">0,501</td>
									<td align="center">0,494</td>
									<td align="center">0,486</td>
									<td align="center">0,494</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN20">
								<p>Fonte: elaborado pelos autores (2020).</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN21">
								<p>Nota: ***, **, * indicam nível de significância inferior a 1%, 5% e 10%, respectivamente. INTENS: Intensidade das Conexões; ESTAB: Estabilidade das Conexões; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensidade multiplicada pela Estabilidade das Conexões; ECM: Escolhas Contábeis de Mensuração; ECR: Escolhas Contábeis de Reconhecimento; ECC: Escolhas Contábeis de Classificação; ECE: Escolhas Contábeis de Evidenciação; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Nível de Governança Corporativa; e EP: Empresas Públicas. O Modelo#1 é representado pela variável de Estabilidade (ESTAB). O Modelo#2 investiga a relação com a variável Intensidade (INTENS). No Modelo#3, verifica-se a influência da variável multiplicativa Estabilidade x Intensidade (ESTAB_INTENS). O Modelo#4 emprega as variáveis de controle Empresas Públicas (EP), Nível de Governança Corporativa (NGC) e American Depositary Receipt (ADR). No Modelo#5, realiza-se a análise com as variáveis de controle e as variáveis de Estabilidade e intensidade. Por último, o Modelo#6 emprega as variáveis de controle e a variável multiplicativa ESTAB_INTENS.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>As escolhas contábeis de reconhecimento, de que trata a <xref ref-type="table" rid="t50">Tabela 5</xref>, referem-se ao modo pelo qual determinado evento econômico é reconhecido quanto ao seu impacto nas demonstrações financeiras, alterando valores de resultado, componentes patrimoniais e fluxos de caixa. Os resultados indicam que a estabilidade das conexões influencia negativamente as escolhas contábeis de reconhecimento (Modelo#5). Isso contraria a ideia de que a disseminação das práticas contábeis poderia ser evidenciada a partir das conexões estabelecidas pelos profissionais do Conselho de Administração das empresas, se observa que tal evidência não se destaca enquanto significativa. </p>
				<p>Na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t60">Tabela 6</xref>, são apresentados os resultados referentes às escolhas contábeis de classificação.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t60">
						<label>Tabela 6.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Análise de Regressão Logit - Variável dependente: ECC</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Variáveis</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#1</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#2</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#3</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#4</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#5</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#6</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
                                <tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Variáveis Independentes</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB</td>
									<td align="center">0,695** </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">1,471**</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">2,429 </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">2,472</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">INTENS</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,133***</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,044</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">2,725</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,760</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,152***</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,186***</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">2,816</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">3,041</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Variáveis de Controle</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">EP</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,222</td>
									<td align="center">-0,406</td>
									<td align="center">-0,266</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,523</td>
									<td align="center">-0,904</td>
									<td align="center">-0,595</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ADR</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,718</td>
									<td align="center">0,960*</td>
									<td align="center">0,826</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">1,451</td>
									<td align="center">1,848</td>
									<td align="center">1,632</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">NGC</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,544</td>
									<td align="center">-1,377***</td>
									<td align="center">-0,804**</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-1,441</td>
									<td align="center">-2,914</td>
									<td align="center">-2,015</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Média da Variável Dependente</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0,500 </td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Erro Padrão da Regressão</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0,489 </td>
									<td align="center">0,480</td>
									<td align="center">0,477</td>
									<td align="center">0,495</td>
									<td align="center">0,453</td>
									<td align="center">0,463</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN22">
								<p>Fonte: elaborado pelos autores (2020).</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN23">
								<p>Nota: ***, **, * indicam nível de significância inferior a 1%, 5% e 10%, respectivamente. INTENS: Intensidade das Conexões; ESTAB: Estabilidade das Conexões; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensidade multiplicada pela Estabilidade das Conexões; ECM: Escolhas Contábeis de Mensuração; ECR: Escolhas Contábeis de Reconhecimento; ECC: Escolhas Contábeis de Classificação; ECE: Escolhas Contábeis de Evidenciação; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Nível de Governança Corporativa; e EP: Empresas Públicas. O Modelo#1 é representado pela variável de Estabilidade (ESTAB). O Modelo#2 investiga a relação com a variável Intensidade (INTENS). No Modelo#3, verifica-se a influência da variável multiplicativa Estabilidade x Intensidade (ESTAB_INTENS). O Modelo#4 emprega as variáveis de controle Empresas Públicas (EP), Nível de Governança Corporativa (NGC) e American Depositary Receipt (ADR). No Modelo#5, realiza-se a análise com as variáveis de controle e as variáveis de Estabilidade e intensidade. Por último, o Modelo#6 emprega as variáveis de controle e a variável multiplicativa ESTAB_INTENS.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>As escolhas contábeis de classificação estão relacionadas à forma de disposição nas demonstrações financeiras de elementos patrimoniais, de resultado e de fluxos de caixa. Os resultados sugerem que a estabilidade e a intensidade das conexões favorecem a disseminação das escolhas contábeis de classificação. De acordo com a teoria da dependência de recursos, os conselheiros interligados podem fornecer informações e conhecimentos inéditos e detalhados que são obtidos de outras empresas e são relevantes e cruciais para as decisões e estratégias de sua própria empresa (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B43">Shropshire, 2010</xref>). </p>
				<p>Assim, o board interlocking possui vantagens comparativas nas decisões corporativas, incluindo a decisão de escolha de métodos contábeis, devido à sua capacidade de aquisição e interpretação de informações (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B35">Rao et al., 2000</xref>). </p>
				<p>Os achados também indicam que os níveis de governança corporativa estão negativamente associados às escolhas contábeis de classificação. Isso faz pensar que empresas não pertencentes aos níveis 1, 2 e Novo Mercado tendem a apresentar maior similaridade de práticas contábeis com as empresas com as quais estão conectadas.</p>
				<p>Ademais, contatou-se que as empresas com títulos negociados nas bolsas americanas tendem a apresentar maior semelhança entre as escolhas relacionadas à forma de disposição nas demonstrações financeiras de elementos patrimoniais, de resultado e de fluxos de caixa. <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B51">Silveira et al. (2004</xref>) afirmam que a submissão a estruturas regulatórias necessárias à adequação às práticas de governança corporativa exigidas pela Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) para o lançamento de ADRs pode aumentar a visibilidade da empresa. Considerando que tais empresas seguem tanto o modelo contábil brasileiro quanto o norte-americano, haveria incentivo para que os resultados apresentassem maior grau de comparabilidade.</p>
				<p>Na <xref ref-type="table" rid="t70">Tabela 7</xref>, são apresentados os resultados referentes às escolhas contábeis de evidenciação.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t70">
						<label>Tabela 7.</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Análise de Regressão Logit - Variável dependente: ECE</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<thead>
								<tr>
									<th align="left">Variáveis</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#1</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#2</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#3</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#4</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#5</th>
									<th align="center">Modelo#6</th>
								</tr>
							</thead>
							<tbody>
                                <tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Variáveis Independentes</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB</td>
									<td align="center">0,142 </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,118</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">0,541 </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,281</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">INTENS</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,015</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,012</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,783</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,453</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ESTAB_INTENS</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,016</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,012</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,805</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,810</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Variáveis de Controle</bold></td>
									<td align="center" colspan="6"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">EP</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,045 </td>
									<td align="center">-0,108</td>
									<td align="center">-0,105</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,114 </td>
									<td align="center">-0,265</td>
									<td align="center">-0,260</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">ADR</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,370 </td>
									<td align="center">-0,327</td>
									<td align="center">-0,325</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0,807 </td>
									<td align="center">-0,707</td>
									<td align="center">-0,704</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left" rowspan="2">NGC</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,169 </td>
									<td align="center">0,078</td>
									<td align="center">0,125</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">0,457 </td>
									<td align="center">0,193</td>
									<td align="center">0,334</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Média da Variável Dependente</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0,500 </td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500 </td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="left"><bold>Erro Padrão da Regressão</bold></td>
									<td align="center">0,501 </td>
									<td align="center">0,500</td>
									<td align="center">0,501</td>
									<td align="center">0,505</td>
									<td align="center">0,507</td>
									<td align="center">0,506</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN24">
								<p>Fonte: elaborado pelos autores (2020).</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN25">
								<p>Nota: ***, **, * indicam nível de significância inferior a 1%, 5% e 10%, respectivamente. INTENS: Intensidade das Conexões; ESTAB: Estabilidade das Conexões; INTENS_ESTAB: Intensidade multiplicada pela Estabilidade das Conexões; ECM: Escolhas Contábeis de Mensuração; ECR: Escolhas Contábeis de Reconhecimento; ECC: Escolhas Contábeis de Classificação; ECE: Escolhas Contábeis de Evidenciação; ADR: American Depositary Receipt; NGC: Nível de Governança Corporativa; e EP: Empresas Públicas. O Modelo#1 é representado pela variável de Estabilidade (ESTAB). O Modelo#2 investiga a relação com a variável Intensidade (INTENS). No Modelo#3, verifica-se a influência da variável multiplicativa Estabilidade x Intensidade (ESTAB_INTENS). O Modelo#4 emprega as variáveis de controle Empresas Públicas (EP), Nível de Governança Corporativa (NGC) e American Depositary Receipt (ADR). No Modelo#5, realiza-se a análise com as variáveis de controle e as variáveis de Estabilidade e intensidade. Por último, o Modelo#6 emprega as variáveis de controle e a variável multiplicativa ESTAB_INTENS.</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>As escolhas contábeis de evidenciação referem-se ao modo como as informações contábeis são divulgadas. Os achados indicam que a estabilidade (ESTAB) e a intensidade (INTENS) não apresentam efeito significativo sobre a semelhança das escolhas contábeis de evidenciação. Tais resultados não são suficientes para confirmar a ideia de que o volume de conexões entre membros do conselho e a sua durabilidade ao longo dos anos favorecem a disseminação de práticas contábeis de divulgação.</p>
				<p>A ausência de significância estatística não permitiu inferir conclusões associadas à origem de recursos das companhias. </p>
			</sec>
			<sec sec-type="conclusions">
				<title>5. Conclusões</title>
				<p>Este artigo apresentou como objetivo analisar a influência da estabilidade e da intensidade do board interlocking nas escolhas contábeis em companhias do setor de energia elétrica com ações negociadas na B3, no período 2010-2016. Para isso, foi utilizada uma amostra constituída por 59 companhias, das quais 57 apresentaram as informações necessárias para a realização da análise, resultando em 177 diferentes conexões entre as empresas.</p>
				<p>A priori, os resultados demonstram a existência de interessantes ligações que muitas vezes se tornam “ocultas” para os investidores no emaranhado de companhias inscritas na bolsa de valores. Tais ligações podem influenciar a tomada de decisão sobre investimentos, principalmente, quando se leva em consideração a premissa de diversificação.</p>
				<p>No que se refere à intensidade das conexões entre membros do conselho de administração, observa-se que a maior média de profissionais ocorreu em 2013, com aproximadamente, 4,18 membros conectados em cada uma das ligações, seguindo pelos anos de 2010, 2015, 2011. No ano de 2012, ocorreu a menor média de ligações entre as companhias, 3,69 profissionais. Os achados indicam que a intensidades das ligações gira em torno de 3,98 membros atuando em conselhos de outras companhias, porém esse valor tende a ser elevado devido ao fato de empresas como a Cemig Distribuição S.A. e Cemig Geração e Transmissão S.A., por exemplo, possuírem em média 47 profissionais em comum.</p>
				<p>Em termos gerais, nota-se que as escolhas contábeis relacionadas à mensuração, apresentaram um considerável nível de similaridade. Percebe-se que 85% das informações desse grupo, em média, são evidenciadas de forma similar nas companhias em que tais empresas estão conectadas. Esse elevado nível de homogeneidade também pode ser observado nas escolhas associadas à evidenciação das demonstrações contábeis. Os resultados evidenciam que os índices das escolhas contábeis de mensuração, classificação e evidenciação se apresentaram praticamente estáveis a partir do ano de 2012, indicando que as companhias que estabeleceram conexões do conselho de administração não mudaram suas práticas contábeis. </p>
				<p>Ademais, os resultados sugerem que a estabilidade e a intensidade das conexões favorecem a disseminação das escolhas contábeis, principalmente quando relacionadas à mensuração e classificação. Esses achados convergem com os de <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">Connelly e Slyke (2012</xref>) para quem a existência de conselheiros em comum em diferentes empresas favorece o acesso e a disseminação de informações.</p>
				<p>Os resultados encontrados complementam um número vasto de estudos (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Addy et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">Balsam et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">Beckman &amp; Haunschild, 2002</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8">Cai et al., 2014</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Chandler et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Chiu et al., 2013</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B20">Han et al., 2015</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B22">Helmers et al., 2017</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B39">Ribeiro &amp; Colauto 2016</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B59">Wong et al., 2015</xref>) os quais têm confirmado empiricamente que o board interlocking pode ser considerado um importante canal de informações. </p>
				<p>Por fim, os resultados encontrados nesse estudo são limitados pela amostra de empresas investigadas, bem como pelas variáveis e técnicas empregadas na análise. Para futuros estudos sugere-se ampliar a análise considerando outras variáveis de controle como modelos de negócios e adoção das mesmas empresas de auditoria que podem culminar em práticas contábeis comuns.</p>
			</sec>
		</body>
	</sub-article>-->
</article>