Servicios
Servicios
Buscar
Idiomas
P. Completa
Predicting of borderline personality disorder (BPD) based on emotional intelligence, apathy and empathy among the soldiers admitted to a military hospital
Ameneh Bakhshizadeh; Abouzar Nouri alemi MBBS; Ghasem zadeh MR;
Ameneh Bakhshizadeh; Abouzar Nouri alemi MBBS; Ghasem zadeh MR; AM Rahanejad; Fatemeh Zahra Shirvani nia
Predicting of borderline personality disorder (BPD) based on emotional intelligence, apathy and empathy among the soldiers admitted to a military hospital
Predicción del trastorno límite de la personalidad (DBP) basado en inteligencia emocional, apatía y empatía entre los soldados ingresados en un hospital militar
Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertensión, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 75-82, 2019
Sociedad Latinoamericana de Hipertensión
resúmenes
secciones
referencias
imágenes

Abstract: Due to the prevalence of BPD among soldiers and the importance of their mental health, the purpose of the study was to examine the relationship between emotional intelligence, alexithymia and empathy with BPD among the soldiers and to evaluate whether these variables could predict PBD. The study was cross-sectional with descriptive design. In this study, 150 soldiers with BPD admitted to 505 Army Psychiatric Hospital, Tehran were selected by convenience sampling and answered the following questionnaires: Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-I), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and Mehrabian and Epstein Empathy Questionnaire (EQ) with data analysis done in SPSS. The aspects of EQ had a reverse and significant relationship with BPD (r=-0.81), (p=0.01) and the relationship between alexithymia and PBD was direct and significant (p = 0.46) r), (p = 0.01), and the aspects of empathy and BPD were related inversely and significantly (r = -0.26), (p = 0.01). The results showed that the symptoms of BPD could be predicted somehow based on EI, alexithymia and empathy in soldiers with this disorder. From among the aspects of the variables studied, ability to solve problem, self-respect, self-actualization and optimism, objective thinking and difficulty in emotion recognition, emotional susceptibility, reactive empathy, participatory empathy and empathy toward others had the greatest roles in the prediction of BPD, but the subscale of independence with BPD examined among the soldiers was insignificant. These results are predictable in the context of emotional maladaptation, emotional distress, and mental impairment in BPD.

Keywords:BPDBPD,EIEI,AlexithymiaAlexithymia,EmpathyEmpathy,SoldiersSoldiers.

Resumen: Debido a la prevalencia de BPD entre los soldados y la importancia de su salud mental, el objetivo del estudio fue examinar la relación entre la inteligencia emocional, la alexitimia y la empatía con BPD entre los soldados y evaluar si estas variables podrían predecir la PBD. El estudio fue transversal con diseño descriptivo. En este estudio, 150 soldados con BPD ingresados ​​en el 505 Army Psychiatric Hospital, Teherán fueron seleccionados por muestreo de conveniencia y respondieron los siguientes cuestionarios: Inventario de Cociente Emocional Bar-On (EQ-I), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) y Mehrabian and Epstein Empathy Questionnaire (EQ) con análisis de datos realizado en SPSS. Los aspectos de EQ tuvieron una relación inversa y significativa con la DBP (r = -0.81), (p = 0.01) y la relación entre la alexitimia y la PBD fue directa y significativa (p = 0.46) r), (p = 0.01), y los aspectos de empatía y BPD se relacionaron de manera inversa y significativa (r = -0.26), (p = 0.01). Los resultados mostraron que los síntomas de la DBP podrían predecirse de alguna manera en función de la IE, la alexitimia y la empatía en los soldados con este trastorno. De entre los aspectos de las variables estudiadas, la capacidad para resolver problemas, la autoestima, la autorrealización y el optimismo, el pensamiento objetivo y la dificultad en el reconocimiento de emociones, la susceptibilidad emocional, la empatía reactiva, la empatía participativa y la empatía hacia los demás tuvieron los roles más importantes en el mundo. La predicción de BPD, pero la subescala de independencia con BPD examinada entre los soldados fue insignificante. Estos resultados son predecibles en el contexto de mala adaptación emocional, angustia emocional y deterioro mental en la DBP.

Palabras clave: BPD, EI, Alexitimia, Empatía, Soldados.

Carátula del artículo

Artículos

Predicting of borderline personality disorder (BPD) based on emotional intelligence, apathy and empathy among the soldiers admitted to a military hospital

Predicción del trastorno límite de la personalidad (DBP) basado en inteligencia emocional, apatía y empatía entre los soldados ingresados en un hospital militar

Ameneh Bakhshizadeh
In Clinical Psychology. Islamic Azad University Electronic Campus, Tehran, Iran., Irán
Abouzar Nouri alemi MBBS
psychiatric Department Faculty of medicine. AJA University of Medical Science. Tehran. Iran, Irán
Ghasem zadeh MR
Assistant professor, Psychiatric Department faculty of medicine. AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Irán
AM Rahanejad
Assistant professor, Clinical Psychology Department, Medical Faculty. AJA University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran, Irán
Fatemeh Zahra Shirvani nia
azad University of Neyshaboor, Irán
Revista Latinoamericana de Hipertensión, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 75-82, 2019
Sociedad Latinoamericana de Hipertensión
Introduction:

Having a desirable personality is an ideal and significant point for the military forces. The studies have shown the prevalence of psychiatric disorders in modern society, especially among military personnel given the nature of their job, so that many people suffer from these problems and spend a lot on the cost of treating these disorders annually (Maleki et al., 2011). The latest studies in Iran show that of every 10 soldiers, 5 have mental and health problems (Khederi, 2014). Meanwhile, BPD with antisocial personality disorder is the most prevalent among soldiers in barracks and military centers (Rahnejat et al., 2006). In a study to examine the causes of psychiatric absenteeism in staff members referring to the medical commission in a military center from 2007 to 2013, 5233 soldiers were examined, of whom about 52.8% (2690) had personality disorder and the most common personality disorder were BPD (91.5%) and antisocial personality disorder (7.1%) (Shahmiri et al., 2014). In a study by Black et al. (2006) to examine the prevalence of BPD among 576 soldiers, it was found that about 43% of them (247) suffered BPD. BPD is known as a pattern of learning from instability in interpersonal relationships, self-image, emotions, and impulsivity beginning from early adulthood manifested in many areas (American Psychiatric Association, 2013). Although the cause of this disorder has remained unknown (Dubovsky & Kiefer, 2014), according to researchers, this disorder is due to factors like inheritance (Amad et al., 2014), Brain abnormalities (Tebartz van Elst et al. 2003; Schmahl et al., 2003) and early life experiences (Lobbestael & Arntz, 2015; Martín-Blanco et al., 2014). Significant cases of suicide cases (Nakar et al., 2016), severe functional degradation (Skodol et al., 2002), and multiple psychological disorders (Fornaro et al., 2016; Kohling et al., 2015) associated with this common disorder are among the psychological side effects imposing costly burdens on societies (Kazanasmaz H, Calik M. 2017). Moreover, self-mutilation and suicide among the soldiers are not accidental, so a flow of thoughts, behaviors, situations and interpersonal relationships often start before the duty begins (Sağ, S., Nas, Ö. F., Öztürk, A., Yeşilbursa, D., & Erdoğan, C. (2017). In addition, the availability of weapons and the opportunity to use them in places away from others is a major risk of suicide in the military forces (Mahon et al., 2005). Hosseini et al., in a study in 2004, examined the self-infliction characteristics of the soldiers admitted to 506 Army Hospital in Tehran, and 150 of the hospitalized patients and military outpatients who had self-infliction were among the sample.

The results showed that 74% of these patients had BPD and most of them had self-infliction in their upper extremities (93.3%). Furthermore, most (85.1%) self-inflicting patients had their self-infliction symptoms beforehand and the average cases of self-infliction were 9 times, and patients with a history of self-indulgence of 2 times were the most frequent. It is argued that signs of BPD are all indicative of problems in the process of emotional regulation, and symptoms such as impulsivity, self-harm, fear of abandonment, and analytical signs are abnormal responses to emotions. People with this disorder show these due to lack of enough skill to identify and control emotions (Zeidner, Matthews & Roberts, 2009). In other words, BPD is a disorder characterized by significant deficiencies in the ability to understand and regulate emotions and mood (Yen, Zlotnick & Costello, 2002) and have significant deficiencies in emotional abilities (Hertler et al., 2009; Sinclair & Feigenbaum 2012). One of these deficiencies is the issue of emotional intelligence (EI). Meyer, Salvey and Caruso (2008) consider IE to have four interrelated abilities: emotion perception in oneself and others, using emotions to facilitate decision making, emotional comprehension and emotion management. In a study by Shahmiri et al. (2016) to examine EI of duty staff, EI was associated with mental health disorders and its components such as physical symptoms, anxiety symptoms, social dysfunction, and depression symptoms. Thus, one of the factors directly affecting the mental health of a person during this period is EI. Intelligence is a structure that regulates emotions, so it is related to BPD (Webb & Mcmurran, 2008). Leible & Snell (2004) showed that students who had symptoms of BPD had a lower score in creativity than the control group, and that the boundary personality was associated with different aspects of EI including emotional clarity, emotional understanding, emotional regulation, personal emotional awareness, private emotional thought and emotional control. In their study, they concluded that those with BPD have a weaker perception of their emotions and have less capacity to overcome negative emotional experiences, which means less EI. Another factor that can be mentioned for these shortcomings is alexithymia. Alexithymia is defined as the difficulty in identifying and describing emotions (physical), difficulty in distinguishing between emotions and feelings, the ability to conceive and an outward and meaningless thought (Parker et al., 2003; Taylor et al. 1997). High levels of alexithymia are associated with high levels of general psychological pathology and ineffective interpersonal in those with BPD (Nicolò et al., 2011). The components of alexithymia create psychological distress in the individual placing the person in a vicious circle that ultimately causes alexithymia. The process of this vicious circle is thus that first, by creating a psychological inability in the person, his cognitive processing system is disrupted and the process of identifying and describing emotions becomes difficult (Bagby et al., 1994). A study by Antonia et al. (2012) on alexithymia in patients with BPD concluded that the disorder was associated with alexithymia and BPD patients had higher levels of alexithymia than the control group. Another factor in these disorders is the empathy skill. Empathy refers to the individual's ability to understand the psychological and mental conditions of others in the development and guidance of interpersonal relationships (Zaki & Ochsner, 2012). Empathic abnormalities in BPD patients are related to mentalizing (understanding the behavior of others) (Bender & Skodol, 2007; Choi-Kain & Gunderson, 2008; Fonagy & Luyten, 2009).

Jeung & Herpertz (2014) investigated the interpersonal abnormalities of empathy and intimacy in BPD patients, aiming at comprehensive and widespread understanding of inferiority (empathy and intimacy) of patients with BPD based on biopsychological and behavioral studies to that time. The results showed that despite some contradictions, behavioral studies on BPD show a cognitive and emotional empathy and low quality of intimate relationships in borderline patients due to the low cognitive and subjective empathy abilities. In addition, the results of various studies show that the level of empathy in patients with BPD is variable, so that the patient showing higher degree of emotional expression while expressing nonverbal emotions, this increases the incidence of misunderstandings and inappropriate social behavior (Neidtfeild, 2017). Indeed, the patients with BPD show many emotional reactions, but they are inadequate in identifying and describing emotions (Antonia, 2012).

As BPD is one of the main syndromes of emotional problems with a crucial role in this regard, the study was conducted to identify emotional deficits in this disorder. Furthermore, due to the importance of improving the mental health of soldiers in duty, increasing their social function and their responsibility and preventing social and service injuries such as self-infliction and suicide and conflict in them, the study examined the different emotional aspects of these patients. This is done to provide an opportunity for a better understanding of their status and treatment interventions. Here, the discussion of emotional and social skills is important in BPD patients, because knowing the underlying processes of this disorder can help in understanding and treating it.

Materials and methods:

The study was descriptive using a correlation design. This cross-sectional study was done on soldiers admitted to 505 Army Psychiatric Hospital the Islamic Republic of Iran Hospital in 2013, based on psychiatrist diagnosis and a structured clinical interview. Furthermore, getting a cut off score in BPD Questionnaire and the validity of diagnostic criteria, the fifth edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Psychiatric Disorders (DSM-5) with BPD were the reasons for doing so. Moreover, 150 of these soldiers were selected through targeted convenient sampling. Having at least third grade guidance education, at least 18 years of age, and having a willingness to participate in the research were criteria for entering the study. Three to five admitted soldiers were trained each day, after explaining the objectives of the plan for the clients with the mentioned criteria; they were placed in the research and the confidentiality of recorded information were explained and the importance of their collaboration was emphasized. If they did not want to participate in the research, they would be excluded and after obtaining informed consent from them, (the verbal consent was enough) as a sample of research, entered the study. The patients with aggression were excluded due to lack of cooperation. Demographic information was completed with a questionnaire including age and education, number of self-reported and its causes, and then other questionnaires were provided to soldiers with the inclusion criteria. The research tools of this research were the following questionnaire: Iranian normed Bar-On EQ-I, with 90 questions and 15 subscales. The validity was calculated by Cronbach's alpha for male students as 0.74 and for female students 0.68 and for the total population 0.93 (Dehshiri, 2003), the validity of this questionnaire was calculated by exploratory factor analysis in Dehshiri (2003). From among the 13 factors in the factor structure of the North American sample (Bar-On, 1997), eight factors were valid for Iranian subjects. There is also a direct and significant relationship between the mean scores of each subscale and the total score of the whole questionnaire. All subscales in the questionnaire are directly related to the emotional intelligence variable. Toronto Alexithymia Questionnaire (TAS-20) has 20 questions, which is summarized in three subscales.

Besharat (2007) developed the Persian version of this scale and reported its validity using Cronbach's alpha for each sub-scale and the total score as 0.82, 0.75, 0.72 and 0.85, respectively. Hosseinzadeh et al. (2012) examined the scale validity through exploratory factor analysis and three factors were introduced as the main factors. According to the studies, one can conclude that this scale has a satisfactory internal consistency and a good validity. Mehrabian and Epstein's (EQ) empathy questionnaire has 33 questions and 7 subscales. Mehrabian and Epstein (1972) reported a coefficient of reliability of the scale of 0.84 and Cronbach's alpha of the questionnaire was 0.88. In addition, the test-retest method with a time interval of 20 days was also used with a reliability coefficient of 0.599, P<0.001. The positive and significant correlations between the scores of the scales with the scores of the balanced emotional empathy questionnaire showed the validity of this tool. In addition, all three questionnaires were designed in the form of a Likert scale. Finally, the data and variables were entered into SPSS20 and then analyzed by means of frequency, percentage, mean and standard deviation, analysis of variance and Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests, Pearson correlation and regression analysis and statistical analysis.

Results:

The results of demographic analysis showed that of the 150 soldiers examined, 90.7% were single and 9.3% were married, and the mean and standard deviation of the participants' age were 22.50 and 3.36, respectively. In addition, the mean and standard deviation of the participants' service record were 7.02 and 6.30 months, respectively. Of them,17.3% of them had third grade guidance school education, 13.3% high school, 27.3% diploma, 6.7% associate' degree and 35.3% had a bachelor's degree and higher, and 75.3% of them were self-employed during the military service and 24.7% did not commit self-infliction during the period of service.

One of the main assumptions of regression analysis is the normal distribution of data. This presumption was examined by Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, and the results showed the insignificance at the level (P<0.05), meaning that the distribution of data is normal.

Table 1
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to examine the normality of the variables.

Pearson correlation test was used to determine correlation between aspects of EI, alexithymia and empathy with BPD. Table 2 shows the correlation matrix of the variables examined in this study.

Table 2
Matrix of correlation between aspects of EI, alexithymia and empathy with soldiers' BPD.

According to the results of Table 2, the correlation of the variables was significant except for the independent scale, which provided the possibility of further analysis. There is another presumption for regression studies: the discussion of the relationship between the variables studied. This presumption is also confirmed regarding the research background in the field of EI, alexithymia, empathy, and signs of BPD. In addition, Scatterplot was used to plot schematic correlations.



Figure 2: Dispersion between total score of alexithymia with BPD Figure1: Dispersion between total score of alexithymia intelligence with BPD Chart 1: Dispersion between total intelligence scales with BPD
Chart 3: Distribution of total EI with BPD

In these charts, the middle line of the slope shows the relationship between total score of intelligence, alexithymia and empathy with soldiers' BPD. Since the relationships are reverse in Chart 1 and Figure 3, the gradient relationship shows that soldiers with BPD have less EI and empathy. In Figure 2, the relationship is direct, and the gradient relationship shows that soldiers with BPD have more alexithymia.

Table 3 shows the multi-correlation coefficient test and coefficient of determination related to the correlation between the total score of the research variables with BPD of the soldiers admitted to the military psychiatric hospital, based on which, the total score of EI, alexithymia and empathy with BPD of the admitted soldiers are correlated.

Table 3:
Multiple correlation coefficient and coefficient of detection related to total score of intelligence, seduction and empathy with soldiers' BPD.

Analysis of variance was used for confirming the linear relationship between the variables and BPD. The results in Table 4 show that as there is a significant linear relationship between total score of EI, alexithymia and empathy with BPD soldiers' admitted to military psychiatric hospital (P<0.01), regression model can be used for this data.

Table 4
Analysis of variance for confirmation of the linear relationship between total score of EI, alexithymia and empathy with BPD in soldiers.

Significance at 0.01 (**)

Regarding the purpose of this study, the regression method was used to study the effect of variables on soldiers' BPD. The results of this test are presented in Table 5.

Table 5
The effect of EI, alexithymia and empathy on BPD.

The results of Table 5 show that the effect of EI on soldiers with BPD at the level (P<0.01) is statistically significant. In other words, soldiers with BPD have less EI. For one unit of SD in EI score, 0.81 unit increase will be observed in soldiers' BPD. In other words, EI is able to predict BPD. The effect of alexithymia on soldiers' BPD (P<0.01) is statistically significant. In other words, soldiers with a BPD have more alexithymia. For one unit of increase in standard deviation of alexithymia, 46.0 unit of increase of SD in BPD will be observed in soldiers admitted to the hospital. In other words, the alexithymia can predict BPD. The effect of empathy on BPD of soldiers referring to hospitals at the level of (P<0.01) is statistically and reversely significant. In other words, soldiers with BPD have less empathy. For one unit of increase in standard deviation of empathy, 0.26 unit of increase of SD in BPD will be observed in soldiers admitted to the hospital. In other words, empathy is able to predict BPD.

Discussion and conclusion:

The results showed that EI can predict BPD, which is consistent with the results of previous studies (Mashhadi et al., 2010; Pirkhaleghi et al., 2014; Label and Snell 2004; Gardner & Calter, 2009), confirming the existence of emotional deficits in BPD patients. Some of the reasons and explanations associated with this consistency can be cited as a model that delivers a sense of intelligence. Bar-On does not only consider the internal relations of one with him in this model, but also examines elements such as interpersonal skills, adaptability, tolerance, and public creation (Bar-On, 2006). Correlation coefficient of EI aspects with soldiers' BPD showed that these individuals have low intrapersonal skills, including the aspects of emotional self-awareness, self-expression, self-respect, and self-actualization. However, the autonomy component in the present study could not the power to predict EI for BPD, whereas in one of the previous studies, the sub-independence scale had the highest relationship with BPD (Pirkhaleghi et al., 2014).

This part of the results needs more research, but according to the results of the present study, independence does not have a role in the prediction of BPD. It seems that the main problem of the soldiers is the severe experience of negative emotions, alexithymia and adjustment problems not a kind of extreme dependence on others that is another feature of those with BPD. Moreover, it can be concluded that these problems are predictable in line with the military life style, constraints, and stress in the military service, but the role of military training can be considered in terms of the independence component of these soldiers. For example, Danesh Fard and Zakeri (2011) examined the relationship between general education training and development of personality skills on 230 soldiers in one of the educational centers of NAJA and showed that military training had a positive and significant effect on personality skills and personal experience of soldiers. In addition, according to the results of the studies, among the fifteen aspects of EI, the ability to solve problem, self-respect, self-actualization and optimism had the highest share in the prediction of BPD. The weakness in problem solving is related to the compatibility problems of these individuals with the greatest relationship with BPD. Problem solving needs thinking and reflection on the nature of the problem, which is predictable due to the impulsiveness of these individuals. In addition, the mental factors of concern and anxiety in a military period can increase the likelihood of these problems. In addition, the overall creativity and personal emotions in these individuals are unstable, resulting in acute periods of depression, anxiety, or anger, and as a result they use self-infliction as a means of adjusting their personal emotions. As the results of the demographic questionnaire of these soldiers showed, about 75% of them had attempted self-infliction. According to Millon, these results show that the rapid and sudden changes in emotions and impulsive behavior in people with BPD can be verified due to the lack of organization and integration in personal psychological control, and the lack of coordination of behavior with the demands of the environment (Millon, 2004). The results on the aspects of alexithymia show that these aspects can predict BPD. These results confirm the previous studies (Berenbaum, 1996; Web and Macroman, 2008) in this regard, which explains the weakness in recognizing emotions as the main cause of the emotional problems of BPD patients. According to the results, objective thinking and difficulty in identifying feelings had the greatest share in relation to border troops, consistent with the theory of Taylor and Bagby (2000), stating that a person with high alexithymia has weakness in the cognitive processing system, making it difficult to identify and describe emotions. On the other hand, objective thinking is realistic and focuses on simple and objective things. A person with high alexithymia does not think logically and does not interpret the events, and instead of paying attention to his inner feelings and aspects cares about the uncertainties and external events. The inability in identifying emotions and focus on external aspects in identifying and describing them can lead to a person's weakness in differentiating emotions, which ultimately leads to a bipolar excitement, a feature found in BPD. Moreover, the results confirm the Linehan social biomedical theory of patients that states that BPD patients do not value self-esteem as a result of the discredited environment and try to think and feel in their surroundings not within themselves (Linehan, 1993). In addition, the results showed that empathy can predict BPD, and the subscales of emotional susceptibility, reactive empathy, participatory empathy and empathy toward others had the highest share in predicting BPD impairment, indicating a weakness in understanding the emotional conditions of others. These confirm the previous studies (Jong and Herpts, 2014) on empathy and BPD, showing a cognitive and emotional empathy in these individuals. Furthermore, the deficiency in empathy in these soldiers can be attributed to the inefficiency of subjectivity in patients with BPD, which can be discussed according to the studies by Bateman and Fongji (2004). They stated that BPD is a mental disorder, process mentalization which individuals use it to show the social world, which seems to be disrupted in patients with BPD.

The limitations of this study were the measuring tools limited to the questionnaire and the sample that could limit the generalizability of the results. In order to modify the limitations, it is recommended that other researchers apply these scales to non-soldiers and women with this disorder. In addition, in a structural equation modeling study, the results of this study should be extracted as a model so that it can be used as a therapeutic model for the initial prevention of trait or BPD at the community level. Given the behavioral problems in patients with BPD, a more comprehensive study with more soldiers should be done through systematic and continuous evaluation of mental health centers and military unit counseling. In case of similar results, appropriate therapeutic interventions and presentation should be provided to strengthen these variables to prevent or reduce trait signs or BPD.

Supplementary material
Acknowledgements

The authors hereby show their gratitude to Mr. Jafar Enisi for his sincere cooperation in carrying out statistical work.

References
1. Amad A., Ramoz N., Thomas, P., Jardri,R., & Gorwood P. (2014). Genetics of BPD: Systematic review and proposal of an integrative model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2014 Mar; 40:6-19.
2. Amad,A., Ramoz N., Thomas, P., Jardri R., & Gorwood P. (2014). Genetics of borderline personality disorder: Systematic review and proposal of an integrative model. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 2014 Mar; 40:6-19.
3. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
4. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
5. Antonia S. New, Marije aan het Rot, Luis H. Ripoll, M. Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez, Sophie Lazarus, Emma Zipursky, Shauna R. Weinstein, Harold W. Koenigsberg, Erin A. Hazlett, Marianne Goodman, and Larry J. Siever. (2012). Empaty and Alexithymia in BPD: Clinical and Laboratory Measures. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 2012, 037.
6. Antonia S. New, Marije aan het Rot, Luis H. Ripoll, M. Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez, Sophie Lazarus, Emma Zipursky, Shauna R. Weinstein, Harold W. Koenigsberg, Erin A. Hazlett, Marianne Goodman, and Larry J. Siever. (2012). Empaty and Alexithymia in Borderline Personality Disorder: Clinical and Laboratory Measures. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 2012, 037.
7. Bagby R. M., Taylor G. J., & Parker J. D. (1994). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: II. Convergent, discriminant and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 33–40.
8. Bagby R. M., Taylo, G. J., & Parker J. D. (1994). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: II. Convergent, discriminant and concurrent validity. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 38, 33–40.
9. Bar-On R. (1997). The Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
10. Bar-On R. (1997). The Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i): Technical manual. Toronto, Canada: Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
11. Bar-On R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, supl., 13-25.
12. Bar-On R. (2006). The Bar-On model of emotional-social intelligence (ESI). Psicothema, 18, supl., 13-25.
13. Bateman AW Fonagy P. (2004). Mentalization based treatment of BPD. J Pers Disord; 18(1):36-51.
14. Bateman AW Fonagy P. (2004). Mentalization based treatment of BPD. J Pers Disord; 18(1):36-51.
15. Bender D. S., & Skodol A. E. (2007). Borderline personality as a self-other representational disturbance. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(5), 500–517.
16. Bender D. S., & Skodol A. E. (2007). Borderline personality as a self-other representational disturbance. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21(5), 500–517.
17. Berenbaum H. (1996). Childhood abuse, alexithymia and personality disorder. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 41 (6), 585–595.
18. Berenbaum H. (1996). Childhood abuse, alexithymia and personality disorder. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 41 (6), 585–595.
19. Besharat,M.A. (2007). The relationship between personality aspects and alexithymia. Contemporary Psychology. 2 (4), 50-58.
20. Black DW., Blum N., Carney Doebbling C., Forman-Hoffman vl., Doebbling BN. (2006). BPD and traits in veterans: psychiatric comorbidity, healthcare utilization, and quality of life along a continuum of severity. S National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. 2006 Sep; 11(9):680-9
21. Black DW., Blum, N., Carney Doebbling, C., Forman-Hoffman, vl., Doebbling,BN. (2006). Borderline personality disorder and traits in veterans: psychiatric comorbidity, healthcare utilization, and quality of life along a continuum of severity. S National Library of Medicine National Institutes of Health. 2006 Sep; 11(9):680-9
22. Choi-Kain LW, Gunderson JG. (2008) Mentalization: ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of BPD. Am J Psychiatry; 165(9):1127-35.
23. Choi-Kain LW, Gunderson JG. (2008) Mentalization: ontogeny, assessment, and application in the treatment of borderline personality disorder. Am J Psychiatry; 165(9):1127-35.
24. Dadras, M. (2016). The Effect of Life Skills Training on Emotional Intelligence of Police Commanders Soldiers in Taybad. Journal of Khorasan Razavi Law Enforcement. P. 105-122.
25. Daneshfard, K.A., Zakeri, M. (2011). Relationship between public duty training courses and the development of personality skills. Journal of Military Medicine, 13 (3), 159-165.
26. Dehshiri, Gh.R. (2003). The Normalization of the Bar-An Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire in Tehran University Students. Master's thesis. Allameh Tabatabaei University.
27. Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of BPD. Developmental Psychopathology, 21(4), 1355–1381.
28. Fonagy, P., & Luyten, P. (2009). A developmental, mentalization-based approach to the understanding and treatment of borderline personality disorder. Developmental Psychopathology, 21(4), 1355–1381.
29. Fornaro M1, Orsolini L2, Marini S3, De Berardis D4, Perna G5, Valchera A6, Ganança L7, Solmi M8, Veronese N9, Stubbs B. (2016). The prevalence and predictors of bipolar and BPDs comorbidity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Jornal of Affective Disorder, 2016 May;195: 105-18.
30. Fornaro M1, Orsolini L2, Marini S3, De Berardis D4, Perna G5, Valchera A6, Ganança L7, Solmi M8, Veronese N9, Stubbs B. (2016). The prevalence and predictors of bipolar and borderline personality disorders comorbidity: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Jornal of Affective Disorder, 2016 May;195: 105-18.
31. Gardner, K., & Qualter, P. (2009). Emotional intelligence and borderline personality disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), 94-98.
32. Gardner, K., & Qualter, P. (2009). Emotional intelligence and BPD. Personality and Individual Differences, 47(2), 94-98.
33. Hertel, J., Schutz, A & Lammers, C. (2009). Emotional Inteligence and Mental Disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 65(9), 942—954.
34. Hertel, J., Schutz, A & Lammers, C. (2009). Emotional Inteligence and Mental Disorder. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, Vol. 65(9), 942—954.
35. Hosseini, S.R., Daniyavi, V., Shafighi, F., Rouhani, M., Kazemi, J., Garakhani, Sh. Investigation of Self-Detection Specification in Soldiers Referring to Tehran Army 506 Hospital in 2004. Journal of Army University of Medical Sciences. 5 (4): 1443-1446
36. Hosseinzadeh, A.A., Houman, H.A., Salehi, M., Kushaki, Sh. (2012). Maternal bonding and signs of eating-related vulnerability: The role of mediators of alexithymia and eating disorder beliefs. Transformational Psychology, Iranian Psychology, 9 (34), 129-142.
37. Jeung, H., Herpertz, SC., (2014). Impairments of interpersonal functioning: empathy and intimacy in BPD. Psychopathology. 2014; 47(4):220-34.
38. Jeung, H., Herpertz, SC., (2014). Impairments of interpersonal functioning: empathy and intimacy in borderline personality disorder. Psychopathology. 2014; 47(4):220-34.
39. Kazanasmaz H, Calik M. Coexistence of Chiari malformation type I and isolated hemihypertrophy in a 15-year old girl: a case report. J Clin Exp Invest. 2017;8(3):101-3. https://doi.org/10.5799/jcei.343203
1. Khedri, B., Dabaghi, P. (2014). Studyingthe Relationship between Coping Styles and Mental Health of Soldiers. Quarterly Journal of Nursing and Razi Medical Sciences, No. 5, second year.
2. Kohling, J., Ehrenthal, J. C., Levy, K. N., Schauenburg, H., & Dinger, U. (2015). Quality and severity of depression in BPD: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychological Review. 2015 Apr; 37:13-25.
3. Kohling, J., Ehrenthal, J. C., Levy, K. N., Schauenburg, H., & Dinger, U. (2015). Quality and severity of depression in borderline personality disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Psychological Review. 2015 Apr; 37:13-25.
4. Leible, T.L., & Snell, Jr., W.E. (2004). Borderline personality disorder and multiple aspects of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 393–404.
5. Leible, T.L., & Snell, Jr., W.E. (2004). BPD and multiple aspects of emotional intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 393–404.
6. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York, Guilford, 1-25.
7. Linehan, M. M. (1993). Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment of BPD. New York, Guilford, 1-25.
8. Lobbestael, J., & Arntz, A. (2015), 'Emotional hyperreactivity in response to childhood abuse by primary caregivers in patients with BPD'. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, vol 48, pp.
9. Lobbestael, J., & Arntz, A. (2015), 'Emotional hyperreactivity in response to childhood abuse by primary caregivers in patients with borderline personality disorder'. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, vol 48, pp.
10. Mahon MJ, Tobin JP, Cusack DA, Kelleher C, Malone KM. (2005) Suicide among regular-duty military personnel: a retrospective case-control study of occupation- specific risk factors for workplace suicide. Am J Psychiat; 162: 1688-1696.
11. Mahon MJ, Tobin JP, Cusack DA, Kelleher C, Malone KM. (2005) Suicide among regular-duty military personnel: a retrospective case-control study of occupation- specific risk factors for workplace suicide. Am J Psychiat; 162: 1688-1696.
12. Maleki, B., Sanei, S., Borhani, H., Ghavami, A. (2011). The Effect of Military Training on Personality Characteristics of Military Students. Journal of Military Medicine, 13 (4), 195-200.
13. Martín-Blanco, A., Soler, J., Villalta, L., Feliu-Soler, A., Elices, M., Pérez, V. Pascual, J. C. (2014). Exploring the interaction between childhood maltreatment and temperamental traits on the severity of BPD. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 2014, 55(2):311-8.
14. Martín-Blanco, A., Soler, J., Villalta, L., Feliu-Soler, A., Elices, M., Pérez, V. Pascual, J. C. (2014). Exploring the interaction between childhood maltreatment and temperamental traits on the severity of borderline personality disorder. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 2014, 55(2):311-8.
15. Mashhadi, A., Soltani, E., Razmjooi, R. (2010). Relationship between emotional intelligence and signs of BPD. Journal of Principles of Mental Health, 12 (1), pp. 9-390.
16. Mayer J, Salovey P, Caruso D. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability of eclectic traits. American Psychologist; 63: 503–17.
17. Mayer J, Salovey P, Caruso D. (2008). Emotional intelligence: New ability of eclectic traits. American Psychologist; 63: 503–17.
18. Millon, T. (2004) .Personality Disorders in Modern life. New Jersy: Wiley.
19. Millon, T. (2004) .Personality Disorders in Modern life. New Jersy: Wiley.
20. Nakar O, Brunner R, Schilling O, Chanen A, Fischer G, Parzer P, Carli V, Wasserman D, Sarchiapone M, Wasserman C, Hoven CW, Resch F, Kaess M. (2016). Developmental trajectories of self-injurious behavior, suicidal behavior and substance misuse and their association with adolescent borderline personality pathology. Affect Disord. 2016 Jun;197: 231–8.
21. Nakar O, Brunner R, Schilling O, Chanen A, Fischer G, Parzer P, Carli V, Wasserman D, Sarchiapone M, Wasserman C, Hoven CW, Resch F, Kaess M. (2016). Developmental trajectories of self-injurious behavior, suicidal behavior and substance misuse and their association with adolescent borderline personality pathology. Affect Disord. 2016 Jun;197: 231–8.
22. Neidtfeild, I. (2017). Experimental investigation of cognitive and affective empathy in BPD: Effect of ambiguity in multimodal social information processing. Psychiatry Research, 253 (2017) 58-63.
23. Neidtfeild, I. (2017). Experimental investigation of cognitive and affective empathy in borderline personality disorder: Effect of ambiguity in multimodal social information processing. Psychiatry Research, 253 (2017) 58-63.
24. Nicolò G, Semerari A, Lysaker PH, et al. (2011). Alexithymia in personality disorders: Correlations with symptoms and interpersonal functioning. Psychiatry Res; 190 (1):37-42.
25. Nicolò G, Semerari A, Lysaker PH, et al. (2011). Alexithymia in personality disorders: Correlations with symptoms and interpersonal functioning. Psychiatry Res; 190 (1):37-42.
26. Parker, J. D., Taylor, G. J., & Bagby, R. M. (2003). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 269–275.
27. Parker, J. D., Taylor, G. J., & Bagby, R. M. (2003). The 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale: III. Reliability and factorial validity in a community sample. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 55, 269–275.
28. Pirkhaleghi, A.R., Mohammadzadeh, A., Najafi; M.; Jangjuy, M. (2014). Border personality prediction based on emotional intelligence components. Magazine of Principles of Mental Health, 17 (1): 7-12.
29. Rahnejat, A.M., Sharifi, M., Najafipour, F., Rouhani, M. "Mental health for military commanders and units" (collections of military medicine, No. 2), Second edition, Tehran: Inspection of the Office for the Treatment and Treatment of Nazaja, 2006.
30. Sağ, S., Nas, Ö. F., Öztürk, A., Yeşilbursa, D., & Erdoğan, C. (2017). Bilateral perirenal fluid accumulation associated with tetralogy of fallot. European Journal of General Medicine, 14(3).
31. Schmahla, Christian G., Vermettenb, Eric. Elzingac, Bernet M. Bremnerd, J. Douglas, (2003). Magnetic resonance imaging ofhippocampal and amygdala volume in women with childhood abuse and BPD. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 122 (2003) 193–198.
32. Schmahla, Christian G., Vermettenb, Eric. Elzingac, Bernet M. Bremnerd, J. Douglas, (2003). Magnetic resonance imaging ofhippocampal and amygdala volume in women with childhood abuse and borderline personality disorder. Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging, 122 (2003) 193–198.
33. Shahmiri, H., Moradzadeh, J., Farrokh, M.A., Rahnejat, A.M. (2016). The Relationship between Emotional Intelligence and Mental Health and Demographic Components of Army Staff. Avicenna Journal of Nursing & Midwifery. Eighteenth year, number three, machine gun 56.
34. Shahmiri, H., Taqwa, A., Firoozian, S., Kazemi, S.H.R. (2014). Investigating the Causes of Exemptions for Psychiatric Disorders in the Task Force Referring to the Medical Commission of a Military Center between 2007 and 2013. Quarterly Journal of Nurses and Physicians in Razm, No. 3, Year 4, Autumn.
35. Sinclair, H., & Feigenbaum, J. (2012). Trait emotional intelligence and BPD. Personality and Individual Differences, 52 (6), 674-679.
36. Sinclair, H., & Feigenbaum, J. (2012). Trait emotional intelligence and borderline personality disorder. Personality and Individual Differences, 52 (6), 674-679.
37. Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, Pfohl B, Widiger TA, Livesley WJ, Siever LJ. (2002). The borderline diagnosis I: psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure. Biological Psychiatry. 2002 Jun 15; 51(12):936-50.
38. Skodol AE, Gunderson JG, Pfohl B, Widiger TA, Livesley WJ, Siever LJ. (2002). The borderline diagnosis I: psychopathology, comorbidity, and personality structure. Biological Psychiatry. 2002 Jun 15; 51(12):936-50.
39. Taylor, G. J., & Bagby, M. (2000). An overview of the alexithymia construct. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.). The handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 263–276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
40. Taylor, G. J., & Bagby, M. (2000). An overview of the alexithymia construct. In R. Bar-On & J. D. A. Parker (Eds.). The handbook of emotional intelligence (pp. 263–276). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
41. Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M., & Parker, J. D. A. (1997). Disorders of affect regulation: Alexithymia in medical and psychiatric illness. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
42. Taylor, G. J., Bagby, R. M., & Parker, J. D. A. (1997). Disorders of affect regulation: Alexithymia in medical and psychiatric illness. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
43. Tebartz van Elst L1, Hesslinger B, Thiel T, Geiger E, Haegele K, Lemieux L, Lieb K, Bohus M, Hennig J, Ebert D. Frontolimbic brain abnormalities in patients with BPD: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jul 15;54(2):163-71.
44. Tebartz van Elst L1, Hesslinger B, Thiel T, Geiger E, Haegele K, Lemieux L, Lieb K, Bohus M, Hennig J, Ebert D. Frontolimbic brain abnormalities in patients with borderline personality disorder: a volumetric magnetic resonance imaging study. Biol Psychiatry. 2003 Jul 15;54(2):163-71.
45. Webb, D. Mcmurran, M. (2008). Emotional intelligence, alexithymia and BPD traits in young adults. Personality and Mental Health. 2: 265–273.
46. Webb, D. Mcmurran, M. (2008). Emotional intelligence, alexithymia and borderline personality disorder traits in young adults. Personality and Mental Health. 2: 265–273.
47. Yen, S., Zlotnick, C., & Costello, E. (2002). Affect regulation in women with BPD traits. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 190, 693–696.
48. Yen, S., Zlotnick, C., & Costello, E. (2002). Affect regulation in women with borderline personality disorder traits. Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, 190, 693–696.
49. Zaki J, Ochsner K. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nat Neurosci; 15 (5):675–80. This review highlights the need for naturalistic empathy research and summarizes research on SR and MSA processing thus far in nonclinical subjects
50. Zaki J, Ochsner K. (2012). The neuroscience of empathy: progress, pitfalls and promise. Nat Neurosci; 15 (5):675–80. This review highlights the need for naturalistic empathy research and summarizes research on SR and MSA processing thus far in nonclinical subjects
51. Zeidner M, Matthews G, Roberts RD. (2009). What we know about emotional intelligence: how it a.ects learning, work, relationships, and our mental health. Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 182-90.
52. Zeidner M, Matthews G, Roberts RD. (2009). What we know about emotional intelligence: how it a.ects learning, work, relationships, and our mental health. Massachusetts: The MIT Press; 182-90
Notes
Table 1
Kolmogorov-Smirnov test to examine the normality of the variables.

Table 2
Matrix of correlation between aspects of EI, alexithymia and empathy with soldiers' BPD.



Figure 2: Dispersion between total score of alexithymia with BPD Figure1: Dispersion between total score of alexithymia intelligence with BPD Chart 1: Dispersion between total intelligence scales with BPD
Chart 3: Distribution of total EI with BPD
Table 3:
Multiple correlation coefficient and coefficient of detection related to total score of intelligence, seduction and empathy with soldiers' BPD.

Table 4
Analysis of variance for confirmation of the linear relationship between total score of EI, alexithymia and empathy with BPD in soldiers.

Significance at 0.01 (**)
Table 5
The effect of EI, alexithymia and empathy on BPD.

Buscar:
Contexto
Descargar
Todas
Imágenes
Scientific article viewer generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc