The leaf specimens of Camellia cattienensis were collected from Bau Sau station, Cat Tien National Park, (Dong Nai Province, Vietnam) by Van Hop Nguyen, where its type specimen was collected. The voucher specimen was CT22092022, and it was deposited in the herbarium of the Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, Vietnam National University of Forestry-Dong Nai Campus, Vietnam.

Ten bacterial strains were used to identify the antibacterial activity of the studied species, including six Gram-negative strains (Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Salmonella typhimurium ATCC 13311, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 13883, Klebsiella pneumoniae ATCC 700603, Shigella flexneri ATCC 9199, Enterobacter hormaechei ATCC 700323) and four Gram-positive strains (Staphylococcus saprophyticus BAA750, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 25923, Bacillus cereus ATCC 13883).

The leaves of C. cattienensis were freshly harvested, well-washed, air-dried at 50 ℃, and evenly ground into fine powder. 500 mL of acetone solution (99%, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) was used to immerse 100 g of powder for 72 h; after that, the supernatant was collected and filtered. The remaining solid matter underwent two more rounds of acetone extraction, and the end product was recovered by combining all the filtered fractions. The solvent was then eliminated in vacuum condition at 45 ℃.

Three grams of acetone extract were dissolved in 30 mL of distilled water in an extraction flask. Then, 30 mL n-hexane was added, shaken, and left standing for layer formation. The hexane layer on the top was collected, and this procedure was performed again two more times to pick up 90 mL of the n-hexane extract. This extract was also eliminated under vacuum conditions at 45 ℃ to obtain the hexane fraction. The same process done above was used to obtain ethyl acetate and chloroform (Le et al. 2021).

The chemical constituents of the acetone extract and its fractions (n-hexane, ethyl acetate, and chloroform) from C. cattienensis leaves were determined using the TRACE 1310 Gas Chromatograph in conjunction with the ISQ 7000 mass spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). The DB-5MS column (Agilent, USA) was used as a stationary phase with GC/MS, and run parameters were configured as previously described by Nguyen et al. (2023). Acquired mass spectral data were used to compare with the NIST 2017 library to determine the exact chemical compositions.

The disk diffusion method was employed to assess the antibacterial efficacy of the acetone extract from the studied species, following the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines (CLSI 2016). Acetone extracts at concentrations of 100, 150, and 200 mg mL^-1 in 15% dimethyl sulfoxide were used for the test. As a positive control, a 10-µg gentamicin disk (Nam Khoa BioTek, Vietnam) was used, while 15% DMSO served as the negative control. The experiment was conducted in triplicate, and Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed for statistical analysis.

DPPH radical scavenging activity of the acetone extract from the studied species was determined by DPPH assay (Nguyen et al. 2023) with slight modifications. Methanol 99.8% was used to dissolve the extract into different concentrations. The mixture, composed of 0.3 mL of extract and 3.7 mL of DPPH 0.1 mM was incubated at room temperature for 30 min in the dark. Absorbance measurement was done using a UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Genesys 20, USA) at 517 nm. DPPH radical scavenging activity was calculated as follows the Equation 1:

Where A_o and A_i are the absorbance of the DPPH solution and the sample-DPPH mixture, respectively. The DPPH radical scavenging effect was determined by IC₅₀ value in comparison with the control ascorbic acid.

Antioxidant activity was determined by ABTS radical scavenging assay described by Re et al. (1999) with slight modifications. Initially, solution A comprised 7 mM ABTS and 2.45 mM K₂S₂O_8, was prepared and incubated at 37 ℃ for 18 h in the dark. Subsequently, a mixture of 3 mL of solution A, 0.1 mL of the studied extract, and 1.9 mL of acetone was made, followed by 15 min incubation in the dark. To assess the ABTS radical scavenging activity, the absorbance of the solution was measured at 734 nm using a UV-VIS spectrophotometer (UVS 2800, Labome, USA) equipped with UVWin6 Software. Ascorbic acid served as the reference standard, and the standard curve for ascorbic acid (0 to 15 ppm) was constructed. The sample concentration was determined from the standard curve equation and expressed as µg mL^-1 ascorbic acid.

The chemical components of the acetone extract and chloroform, ethyl acetate, and hexane fractions of C. cattienensis are shown in Table 1 and Figure 1. A total of 54 compounds were found in the four extracts studied. The acetone extract was found to be rich in 2-pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-methyl (22.85%); 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol (17.14%); neophytadiene (16.97%); stigmasterol (12.78%); α-amyrin (5.29%); and n-hexadecanoic acid (4.75%). The chloroform fraction possessed phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-, phosphite (3:1) (74.91%); n-hexadecanoic acid (8.30%); and 7,9-di-tert-butyl-1-oxaspiro (4,5) deca-6,9-diene-2,8-dione (5.08%) as the major compounds. The ethyl acetate fraction was mainly composed of 2-pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-methyl (54.68%); phenol, 2,4-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-, phosphite (3:1) (9.17%); n-hexadecanoic acid (8.25%); and 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (8.08%) whereas hexanedioic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester (30.89%); neophytadiene (25.21%); 3,7,11,15-tetramethyl-2-hexadecen-1-ol (11.58%); n-hexadecanoic acid (10.26%); and 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid, (Z,Z,Z)- (8.44%) were the major compounds in the n-hexane fraction.

Table 1

Figure 1

Previous studies have also demonstrated the chemical compositions of various Camellia species collected from Vietnam. For example, the essential oil of the C. longii flower was found to be rich in α-eudesmol (16.1%), (E)-nerolidol (13.0%), and β-eudesmol (8.9%) (Tran et al. 2023). Hoang et al. (2014) determined 35 volatile compounds that could be the main factor responsible for the black tea’s aroma quality (Camellia sinensis), of which α-ionone, ethyl caprylate, 3-hydroxy-β-damascone, β-ionone, 2(4H)-benzofuranone were the main factors contributing for this (Hoang et al. 2014). The seed oil of the Camellia ninhii was characterized by the predominance of oleic acid (45.43%), palmitic acid (27.83%), and trans-cinnamic acid (4.83%) (Tran et al. 2022).

Furthermore, a recent study reported that the leaf and flower of C. tonkinensis consisted of Zn (10.20 and 13.40 mg kg^-1) and saponin (58.30 and 87.10 mg g^-1) whereas various amino acids were also present in two organs of this plant, including aspartate, glutamate, serine, histamine, glycine, arginine, threonine, alanine, cysteine, tyrosine, valine, phenylalanine, methionine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, and lysine with the contents ranging from 3.512 to 42.087 g kg^-1 (Dang et al. 2022).

Studies have identified the chemical compounds in various Camellia species extracts using different solvents and analyzed them with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. For instance, the methanol extract isolated from Camellia sinensis leaves collected from Bangladesh mainly contained caffeine (27.44%), hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester (14.02%), 9,12,15-octadecatrienoic acid methyl ester (Z, Z, Z) (3.95%) (Hasan et al. 2024). Similarly, the chloroform: methanol extract of the C. sinensis leaves grown in Ambala Cantt., India was found to be rich in caffeine (48.21%), trans-13-octadecenoic acid (18.30%), cis-11-eicosenoic acid (15.15%) (Gupta and Kumar 2017). In addition, the methanol extract of C. sinensis leaves from Dehradun, India, was mainly composed ofn-heptadecanol-1 (68.63%); 2-pentanone, 4-hydroxy-4-methyl- (3.82%); and 7-hexadecanoic acid, methyl ester, (Z) (2.32%) (Pradhan and Dubey 2021). The phytochemistry of the methanol extract of C. sinensis leaves collected from six regions of India was also investigated. Accordingly, the sample extracts from Moonar (Kerala) and Kodaikanal (Tamil Nadu) were characterized by the predominance of caffeine (46.25-57.17%); 1,2,3-benzenetriol (18.40-16.28%); and 1,3,4,5-tetrahydroxycyclohexanecarbonyl (13.96-9.64%). Meanwhile, the extracts grown in Ootacamund (Tamil Nadu) and Bengaluru (Karnataka) contained caffeine 1,3,7-trimethyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione (56.48-57.52%);1,2,3-benzenetriol (28.36-21.55%) as the major compounds. Finally, 1,3,7-trimethyl-3,7-dihydro-1H-purine-2,6-dione (42.75-59.79%) as the most abundant compound in the extracts from Assam (Assam) and Kolkata (West Bengal) (Senthilkumar et al. 2015). Apart from that, the major constituents of the ethanol extract of the C. sinensis leaves from Uganda were caffeine (82.69%); naphthacene-5,12-dione, 6,11 -dihydroxy-2,3,8,9-tetramethyl- (3.73%); and estra-1,3,5(10)-trien-17-ol, 2,3,4-trimethoxy-, (17.β.)- (3.73%) (Hope et al. 2022).

The benzene-ethanol extracts of Camellia oleifera leaves collected from Hunan, China, were found rich in butyraldehyde, semicarbazone (11.58%); hexatriacontane (8.04%); and 1,6-anhydro-β-D-glucopyranose (7.54%) (Liu et al. 2009). The chemical constituents of different extracts of C. oleifera fruit grown in Hunan, China, were also reported. For instance, the methanol extract contained a mixture of γ-sitosterol (43.32%); 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (22.07%); and cis-vaccenic acid (12.71%). The ethanol extract was mainly composed of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (58.78%) and furfural (4.74%), while cis-vaccenic acid (45.20%); n-hexadecanoic acid (10.98%); and 9-octadecenamide, (Z)- (5.82%) were the main compounds in the ethyl acetate extract (Xie et al. 2018). Moreover, the acetone extract of Camellia assamica leaves collected from Dehradun, India was characterized by the predominance of 2',6'dihydroxyacetophenone, bis(trimethylsilyl) ether (17.58%); N(trifluoracetyl)O,Oʹ,Oʺtris(trimethylsilyl) epinephrine (15.83%); and tetracosamethyl cyclododecasiloxane (10.62%) (Pradhan and Dubey 2021).

The antibacterial property of C. cattienensis acetone extract was presented in Table 2. Accordingly, the studied extract was found to be effective against four out of eight bacterial strains, including K. pneumoniae ATCC 700603, S. aureus ATCC 29213, S. aureus ATCC 25923, and S. saprophyticus BAA750. Overall, at a concentration of 200 mg mL^-1, the studied extract exhibits a stronger antibacterial effect against four bacterial strains in comparison with the remaining concentrations (Table 2). Studies provided the antimicrobial activities of different solvent extracts from Camellia species. For example, the chloroform: methanol extract of the Camellia sinensis leaves grown in Ambala Cantt., India had an inhibitory effect on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans (Gupta and Kumar 2017). The methanol extract of the C. sinensis and C. assamica leaves from Dehradun, India and its various fractions such as water, ethanol, methanol, chloroform, and petroleum ether were reported to possess antimicrobial effects against Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhi, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans (Pradhan and Dubey 2021). In another report, the antibacterial effects of the hot water extract isolated from the green, herbal, and black teas (C. sinensis) were also investigated. Accordingly, the first extract was found to be effective against three bacterial strains, including Micrococcus luteus, Bacillus cereus, and Staphylococcus aureus, while the latter extracts exhibited an inhibitory effect on Micrococcus luteus and Bacillus cereus (Chan et al. 2011).

Table 2

The ethanol extract of C. sinensis leaves from Uganda was demonstrated to be effective against different pathogenic bacteria, especially Salmonella and Escherichia coli (Hope et al. 2022). Also, the leaf ethanol extract of this plant collected from Chennai, India, displayed activity against Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus (Anita et al. 2015). The ethanol extract of C. sinensis leaves grown in Iran was effective against 30 Escherichia coli strains isolated from the urine cultures of patients in three hospitals in Zabol, southeastern Iran (Sepehri et al. 2014). Additionally, the organic acids and phenolic components from the seeds of Camellia oleifera cake, collected in Jiangxi, China, exhibited antimicrobial activity against six fungal and bacterial strains, including Aspergillus oryzae, Rhizopus stolonifer, Mucor racemosus, Bacillus subtilis, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli (Zhang et al. 2020). Furthermore, another study demonstrated the antibacterial effects of the methanol extract fractioned into basic, neutral, and acid fractions obtained from Camellia japonica grown in Yeosoo, Korea. Accordingly, the methanol extract, neutral, and acid fractions displayed activity against some bacterial strains, including Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus (Kim et al. 2001).

The antioxidant effects of the tested extract from C. cattienensis were shown in Figure 2. Accordingly, the extract had the DPPH, ABTS free radical scavenging with the IC₅₀ values of 91.63±1.88 and 13.32±0.49 µg mL^-1, respectively.

Figure 2

Compared to other Camellia species, the results show moderate antioxidant potential. For example, the methanol extract of C. sinensis leaves from Bangladesh showed a stronger DPPH scavenging effect with an IC₅₀ value of 69.51 µg mL^-1, indicating better antioxidant activity compared to C. cattienensis (Hasan et al. 2024). Conversely, the acetone extract of C. oleifera seed oil from Taiwan exhibited a much lower antioxidant effect, with only 4.46% inhibition at 200 µg mL^-1, significantly weaker than C. cattienensis (Lee and Yen 2006). Similarly, the ethyl acetate extract of C. oleifera seed oil showed only 5.92% inhibition, while the methanol extract performed better, with 66.50% inhibition at the same concentration (Lee and Yen 2006). In another study, the organic acids and phenolic components of C. oleifera seed cake from Jiangxi, China, demonstrated weaker antioxidant activity than C. cattienensis, with IC₅₀ values of 184 mg L^-1 and 103 mg L^-1, respectively (Zhang et al. 2020). Furthermore, the ethanol extract of C. japonica flowers from Korea demonstrated a DPPH inhibition of up to 60% at 50 µg mL^-1 (Piao et al. 2011), while the ethanol extract of C. japonica leaves from Jeonnam, Korea, showed a stronger antioxidant effect with an IC₅₀ value of 38.53 µg mL^-1 (Yoon et al. 2017).

Overall, the acetone extract of C. cattienensis leaves displayed a moderate antioxidant effect, stronger than that of C. oleifera extracts but weaker compared to the more potent antioxidant effects of C. sinensis and C. japonica ethanol and methanol extracts. These differences likely reflect the variations in solvent choice, plant parts used, and regional factors influencing the phytochemical composition.