Biotecnologia
Volatile chemical composition of essential oil from Bursera graveolens (Kunth) Triana & Planch and their fumigant and repellent activities
Volatile chemical composition of essential oil from Bursera graveolens (Kunth) Triana & Planch and their fumigant and repellent activities
Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences, vol. 41, 2019
Universidade Estadual de Maringá

Received: 01 March 2019
Accepted: 09 August 2019
Abstract: The objectives of this work were the study of the volatile chemical composition of essential oils (EO’s) from Bursera graveolens obtained in the locality of Malagana, municipality of Mahates, Bolívar, Colombia, as well as to evaluate their repellent and fumigant properties. EO’s were extracted by hydro-distillation and characterized by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The major compounds found in B. graveolens were limonene (42.2%), pulegone (20.9%), carvone (7.5%), caryophyllene (4.1%), and trans-carveol (3.8%). The repellent activity of EO’s was determined by the area preference method, where the EO of B. graveolens presented repellent activity against the Tribolium castaneum weevil at a concentration of 1 at 2% and 4 hours of exposure (88.1 and 88.6% respectively). B. graveolens essential oil was more effective in its fumigant activity with LC50 of 108.2 μg oil mL-1. Also, the fumigant and repellent activities of two individual compounds present in the oil were evaluated, that is, limonene (majority) and caryophyllene. The results indicated that B. graveolens essential oil could be a promising alternative to new natural repellents and biocides.
Keywords: gas chromatography, bioactivity, essential oils, Bursera graveolens, Tribolium castaneum, terpenes.
Introduction
Bursera graveolens (Kunth) Triana & Planch, (Burseraceae) is a tree (3-15 m) with a bark of reddish-brown color, alternate leaves grouped at the tips of their branches and unisexual flowers (Muñoz-Acevedo, Serrano-Uribe, Parra-Navas, Olivares-Escobar, & Niño-Porras, 2013). The tree can be seen in Figure 1. It is a native species of tropical America (from south Mexico down to Peru). The different parts of the plant, e.g., leaves, stems and resin, have been used in folk medicine (Peru, Costa Rica, Nicaragua, Guatemala, Cuba, Colombia), in different forms (smoked, infusions, cataplasms, compresses), as healing, abortive, anti-inflammatory, anti-tumor, analgesic, antidiarrheal, depurative, diaphoretic, expectorant, insecticidal, for the treatment of anemia, rheumatism, dermatitis, asthma and colic as well as a mosquito repellent (Nakanishi et al., 2005; Zúñiga et al., 2005; Monzote, Hill, Cuellar, Scull, & Setzer, 2012). Essential oil obtained from B. graveolens has shown diverse activities as an anti-inflammatory (Zuñiga et al., 2005; Manzano-Santana et al., 2009), antiproliferative (Monzote et al., 2012), antioxidant and antimicrobial agent (Andrade-Santiago et al., 2016; Sotelo-Mendez, Figueroa-Cornejo, Césare-Coral, & Alegría-Arnedo, 2017).
Essential oils (EO’s) are a mixture of chemical compounds of an organic nature, which are found as end products of the secondary metabolism of aromatic plants, which are responsible for their characteristic aromas and bioactivities (Andres et al., 2017). Biological pesticides consisting mainly of essential oils have been shown to exert fungicidal, insecticidal and bactericidal effects, among others; therefore, their use in agroindustry has increased exponentially, what has been known as green alternatives in recent years (Prieto, Patiño, Delgado, Moreno, & Cuca, 2011; Benelli et al., 2017). Essential oils have been specially investigated as natural insecticides against several insects from stored products, and many studies have used the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum Herbst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) as a biological model. It is a pest from stored products of great economic importance that is found in grain and flour at homes and stores. T. castaneum is a secondary pest of a wide variety of cereals, legumes, oilseeds, cakes, nuts, spices and products of animal origin. It abounds in warm and dry conditions (Manivannan, 2015).

There are various reports of the fumigant and repellent activities of essential oils on T. castaneum (Stefanazzi, Stadler, & Ferrero, 2011; Jaramillo-Colorado, Martelo, & Duarte, 2012; Taban, Saharkhiz, & Hooshmandi, 2017; Candy, Nicolas, Andriantsoanirina, Izri, & Durand, 2018; Hu, Wang, & Dai, 2019). However, there are no reports on B. graveolens and its components. This study aimed to determinate the volatile chemical composition of B. graveolens essential oil and evaluate its repellent and fumigant activities.
Material and methods
Vegetal material
Fresh leaves from B. graveolens, were collected at the locality of Malagana, municipality of Mahates, Bolivar, Colombia. They were collected in January of 2016. Identification taxonomy was carried out at the Institute of Biology of the Faculty of Exact and Natural Sciences of the University of Antioquia. The EO’s from B. graveolens were stored at the Agrochemical Research Laboratory according to the GIA 015 code.
Extraction of essential oils
The hydro-distillation method was used for the extraction for B. graveolens, using clevenger-type equipment, according to the procedure described by Jaramillo-Colorado, Duarte-Restrepo, and Jaimes (2016). 500 g of fresh leaves, stems, finely chopped and submerged in 2 L of water were used. The extraction time was 2 hours. Essential oil (EO) was separated from the water by decantation. The extractions were done three times. For each EO, an aliquot of 30 μL was taken and diluted in 1 mL of dichloromethane for chromatographic analyzes.
Gas chromatography analysis
Essential oils (20 µL mL-1) were analyzed by means of Agilent Technologies 4890D (Palo Alto, California, USA) gas chromatography equipment (GC) equipped with a split/splitless (250°C, ratio split 1:30) injection port and a flame ionization detector (FID) (280°C). An Agilent 6890N GC coupled to an Agilent 5973N Mass Detector (electron ionization, 70 eV) was used for GC-MS analysis equipped with HP-5 capillary columns (phenyl-dimethylpolysiloxane, 0.2 µm film thickness) 25 m × 0.2 mm id). Working conditions were as follows: injector temperature 260°C; column temperature 70-190°C, 5°C min.-1. The carrier gas was helium (99.995%, Linde, S.A) with a linear velocity of 35 cm s-1. The temperature of the transfer line connected to the mass spectrometer was 280°C; Oven temperature 40 (15 min.) up to 250°C (15 min.) @ 5°C min.-1. For identification of compounds, standard terpenes were used, by analyzing under the same instrumental conditions and by comparing the mass spectrum with those available in the Wiley Mass Spectral Database library. The Mass spectral and retention indexes obtained were compared with the literature reported (Adams, 2007).
Insects and bioassays
Adults of T. castaneum used in the experiments were collected seven days after hatching. Bioassays were carried out in the dark in incubators at 28-30ºC and 70-80% relative humidity (r.h) at the Agrochemical Research laboratory of the University of Cartagena. Oat (Avena sativa) was employed to feed T. castaneum.
Repellent activity
The repellent activity was performed according to Tapondjou, Adler, Fontem, Bouda, & Reichmuth (2005). The experimental method was evaluated using the area preference method. Whatman No. 1 filter papers (diameter 9 cm) were cut in half. The essential oil from B. graveolens was dissolved in acetone.
The concentrations chosen to evaluate the repellent activity were 0.001, 0.01, 0.1 and 1%. A volume of 0.5 mL of each essential oil solution was applied slowly and uniformly to one half of each filter paper, while the other half was treated with an equal volume of acetone alone as a control. The treated and control half discs were dried at room temperature in order to allow evaporation of the solvent. Treated and untreated halves were attached using adhesive tape and placed in Petri dishes. Twenty adults (5-7 day old) of T. castaneum were released separately at the center of each filter paper disc. The dishes were then covered and transferred to an incubator at room temperature. Five replications were used for each concentration.
Fumigant activity
The toxic effect of B. graveolens EO’s was tested on T. castaneum adults. Filter paper discs (Whatman No. 1, 2 cm diameter), deposited at the bottom of Petri dish covers (90 x 15 mm) were used. These were impregnated with oil at doses calculated in such a manner that equivalent fumigant concentrations of 500, 350, 250, 150, 50 µg of oil mL-1 air, respectively, were given. Twenty adult insects (1 to 10-d-old) were introduced and tightly capped (replicated four times for each concentration). Pirilan, a commercial insecticide containing methyl pirimiphos (organophosphorus compound, 300 μg mL-1 air) as an active ingredient was used as positive control. The mortality percentage was determined after 24 hours from the start of exposure (Prieto et al., 2011).
Statistical analysis
The data presented in terms of repellent activity are submitted as the mean ± standard deviation through an ANOVA statistical formula and a t-test of for students; as for the fumigant activity, the mean lethal concentration (LC50 = dose at which 50% mortality of the insect population is produced) was calculated by a linear regression analysis using the STATGRAPHIC Centurion XVI statistical program, version 16.1.03.
Results
The yield of essential oil from B. graveolens was 0.3%. The main components found in the oil were monoterpenes: Limonene (42.2%), pulegone (20.9%), carvone (7.5%), Caryophyllene (4.1%), and trans-carveol (3.8%); see Table 1.
Repellent activity of essential oil
The results of the repellent activity from B. graveolens EO’s are presented in Table 2. The oil from B. graveolens exhibited repellent activity against the Tribolium castaneum weevil at a concentration of 1% at 2 and 4 hours of exposure (88.1 and 88.6% respectively). Limonene (standard), the major compound present in the oil, had the highest repellent activity at a concentration of 1% at 2 and 4 hours of exposure (100%); this had a repellent capacity greater than that presented by the commercial repellent, Ethylbutylacetylaminopropionate (approx. 78%). Caryophyllene exhibited a weak repellent effect, as shown in Table 2.
Fumigant activity
EO from B graveolens exhibited 95 and 100% of mortality on T. tribolium at 350 and 500 µg EO mL-1 of air, respectively, which is similar to the commercial pesticide methyl-pirimiphos (see Figure 2). However, the essential oil from B. graveolens (LC50 = 108.2 μg mL-1 of air) is not more toxic than methyl-pirimiphos (LC50 = 87.4 μg m-1 of air) versus T.castaneum (as deduced by the LC50 confidence intervals in Table 3). On the other hand, limonene, the main compound in the EO of B. graveolens was more toxic (LC50 = 189.6 μL L-1) than caryophyllene (LC50 = 472.6) on T. castaneum (Table 3).
| No | Name of compounda | LR HP-5b | LR HP-5c | Relative aread, % |
| 1 | Limonene | 1028 | 1031 | 42.0±2.40 |
| 2 | cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol | 1118 | 1120 | 1.6±0.50 |
| 3 | cis-Limonene oxide | 1131 | 1134 | 1.1±0.50 |
| 4 | Menthone | 1159 | 1154 | 1.7±0.36 |
| 5 | Isomenthone | 1166 | 1165 | 3.4±0.22 |
| 6 | a-Terpineol | 1171 | 1189 | 1.0±0.08 |
| 7 | trans-Carveol | 1221 | 1217 | 3.8±0.08 |
| 8 | cis-Carveol | 1230 | 1229 | 2.2±0.50 |
| 9 | Pulegone | 1232 | 1237 | 20.9±1.40 |
| 10 | Carvone | 1235 | 1242 | 7.5±0.50 |
| 11 | Carvenone | 1247 | 1252 | 1.8±1.20 |
| 12 | Carvone oxide | 1270 | 1277 | 2.3±0.30 |
| 13 | Isomenthone-2-ethyl | 1277 | 1289 | 1.4±0.42 |
| 14 | a-Copaene | 1375 | 1376 | 1.1±0.50 |
| 15 | b-Elemene | 1388 | 1391 | 1.9±0.60 |
| 16 | Caryophyllene | 1410 | 1404 | 4.1±0.88 |
| 17 | a-Humulene | 1452 | 1454 | 1.7±0.30 |
| 99.7% |
| Sample | Concentration (µg EO cm-2 air) | Repellent, % | |
| 2 hours | 4 hours | ||
| B. graveolens EO | 0.001 | 41.0±10.2 | -20.0±10.0 |
| 0.01 | 47.0±9.2 | 47.5±8.9 | |
| 0.1 | 70.5±5.5 | 74.4±8.2 | |
| 1.0 | 88.1±6.4 | 88.6±5.9 | |
| Limonene | 0.001 | 52.5±5.5 | 58.7±3.3 |
| 0.01 | 77.8±8.2 | 79.0±1.0 | |
| 0.1 | 98.2±2.2 | 98.3±4.4 | |
| 1.0 | 100±0 | 100±0 | |
| Caryophyllene | 0.001 | 30.5±5.0 | 37.2±9.8 |
| 0.01 | 34.6±9.6 | 42.0±3.2 | |
| 0.1 | 40.8±6.4 | 47.5±5.5 | |
| 1.0 | 55.2±3.5 | 63.0±6.0 | |
| Commercial repellent(Ethylbutylacetylaminopropionate) | 0.001 | 25.0±1.5 | 18.0±3.0 |
| 0.01 | 39.2±3.0 | 45.5±5.5 | |
| 0.1 | 50.0±5.0 | 54.6±1.2 | |
| 1.0 | 78.4±2.2 | 78.8±2.4 | |

| Essential oil or compound | Confidence level | LC50 (µg mL-1) | LC95 (µg mL-1) |
| B. graveolens | 0.05 | 108.2 | 118.7 |
| Limonene Caryophyllene | 0.05 | 189.6 | 208.7 |
| 0.05 | 472.6 | 565.4 | |
| Pirilan (methyl-pirimiphos) | 0.05 | 87.4 | 440.6 |
Discussion
EO from Bursera graveolens has monoterpenes as its principal compounds: Limonene (42.2%), pulegone (20.9%), carvone (7.5%), caryophyllene (4.1%), and trans-carveol (3.8%). Figure 3 shows the structure of its major components. Other investigations carried out in Havana (Cuba) reported, for the EO of B. graveolens, compounds such as limonene (30.7%), (E)-β-ocimene (20.8%) and β-elemene (3.0%) (Carmona, Quijano-Celís, & Pino, 2009). Young, Chao, Casabianca, Bertrand, and Minga (2007) found limonene (58.6%) and a-terpineol (10.9%) in the essential oil from Ecuadorian B. graveolens. Muñoz-Acevedo et al. (2013) described germacrene D (20.7%), caryophyllene (18.0%), viridiflorol (8.0%), limonene (6.6%), linalool (6.5%) and dendrolasin (5.3%) in volatile fractions from leave extracts of B. graveolens. Luján-Hidalgo et al. (2012) reported limonene (42.90%), β-ocimene (17.39%), β-elemene (11.82%), menthofuran (6.79%) as major compounds for Mexican B. graveolens.
These divergences related to the composition of essential oils are attributed to different causes, including variations in ecological conditions (climate, type of soil, season of the year, geographical location) in which the plant develops; (extraction method, time, raw material) which can produce qualitative and quantitative changes in the oil (Figueiredo, Barroso, Pedro, & Scheffer, 2008; Andrade et al., 2008). Table 4 shows the major compounds present in B. graveolens EO’s from Cuba, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru and Colombia (department of Atlántico).
This work showed that the essential oil of B. graveolens had repellent and fumigant activities. Many researchers explain the differences in repellent properties between the essential oil and the individual components, among which are the molecular structure, synergistic effect and different species reaction (Ju-Qin et al., 2018; Saad, El-Deeb, & Abdelgaleil, 2019). Malacrino, Campolo, Laudani, & Palmeri (2016) reports a higher repellent activity of R-(+)-limonene compared to the other enantiomer versus Triboliumconfusum. Monoterpenes and phenylpropenes have exhibited significant repellent effects on adults of T. castaneum, among which (-)-menthone, trans-cinnamaldehyde, and α-terpinene are notable (Saad et al., 2019).
Studies show that the fumigant properties of essential oils are associated with the presence of mono and sesquiterpene compounds. Terpenes can be toxic due to their penetration of the insect cuticle (contact effect), respiratory system (fumigant effect) and via the digestive apparatus (ingestion effect) (Ibrahim, Kainulainen, & Aflatuni, 2001).
Plant-based pesticides are considered attractive alternatives to synthetic pesticides, as they usually are safer due to their rapid biodegradation and consequent short-term persistence in the environment (Isman, 2006; 2008). The action of some terpenes is similar to that of the organophosphorus and carbamate compounds present in some conventional insecticides, inhibitors of the enzyme acetylcholinesterase, which causes rapid death due to respiratory failure in certain insects from stored grain (López & Pascual-Villalobos, 2010; Abou-Taleb, Mohamed, Shawir, & Abdelgaleil, 2016). For example, limonene is a component of citrus essential oils recommended for controlling scale insects in ornamental plants and agricultural activities in the United States (Hollingsworth, 2005). Terpinen-4-ol, 1,8-cineol, linalool, R - (+) - limonene and geraniol were tested in vapor form against different stages of Tribolium confusum (Stamopoulos, Damos, & Karagianidou, 2007). Kim, Kang, & Park (2013) reported α-pinene as the most potent inhibitor of AchE activity followed by β-pinene and limonene, while Saad et al. (2019) reported in a fumigant toxicity assay claiming that (-)-terpinen-4-ol (LC50 = 20.47 μl l air-1) and α-terpinene (LC50 = 23.70 μl l air-1) exhibited the highest toxicity without any significant differences between them. Moreover, (-)-menthone and p-cymene showed strong toxicity. Chaubey (2012) found that 1-8-cineole was most effective against Sitophilus oryzae and Tribolium castaneum. Pulegone also displayed strong fumigant toxicity against adults of S. zeamais and T. castaneum (7 day LC(50) = 3.47 and 11.56 mg cm-3, respectively) Liu, Chu, & Jiang (2011).

| Compounds | Cuba Carmona et al. (2009) | Ecuador Young et al. (2007) | Mexico Luján-Hidalgo et al. (2012) | Peru Sotelo-Mendez et al. (2017) | Colombia (department of Atlántico) Muñoz-Acevedo et al. (2013) |
| Limonene | 26.5 | 58.6 | 42.9 | - | 6.6 |
| b-Ocimene | 13.0 | - | 17.3 | 4.93 | 1.5 |
| Linalool | - | - | - | 1.5 | 6.5 |
| Pulegone | - | 1.1 | 0.9 | - | - |
| a-Terpinene | - | - | - | 31.5 | - |
| a-Terpineol | - | 10.9 | - | - | 3.1 |
| Carvone | - | 2.0 | - | - | - |
| Menthofuran | 5.1 | 6.6 | 6.7 | - | 0.8 |
| Piperotine | - | - | - | 5.6 | - |
| trans-Carveol | - | 1.1 | - | - | - |
| b-Elemene | 14.1 | - | 11.8 | - | - |
| Caryophyllene | - | - | - | - | 18 |
| Iso-caryophyllene | - | - | - | 6.6 | - |
| Germacrene A | 3.9 | - | - | - | - |
| Germacrene D | - | 1.7 | - | - | 20.7 |
Conclusion
The repellent and fumigant activity of B. graveolens essential oil against T. castaneum (stored-product insect) was tested in this work. EO and limonene were more active than commercial repellent (Ethylbutylacetylaminopropionate). The results demonstrate that B. graveolens EO and limonene have the potential for the development of natural fumigants and repellents.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to the Agrochemical Research Group. Thanks to Palacio-Herrera F.M for their technical support. The authors acknowledge the support provided by the University of Cartagena, the Support Research Groups Program (2014-2019), sponsored by the Vice-Presidency for Research at the University of Cartagena.
References
Abou-Taleb, H. K., Mohamed, M. I., Shawir, M. S., & Abdelgaleil, S. A. (2016). Insecticidal properties of essential oils against Tribolium castaneum (Herbst) and their inhibitory effects on acetylcholinesterase and adenosine triphosphatases. Natural Product Research, 30(6), 710-714. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2015.1038999
Adams, R. P. (2007). Identification of essential oil components by gas chromatography/ mass spectroscopy (4th ed.). Carol Stream, IL: Allured Publishing.
Andrade-Santiago, J., Graças-Cardoso, M., Batista, L. R., Castro, E. M., Teixeira, M. L., & Ferreira-Pires, M. (2016). Essential oil from Chenopodium ambrosioides L.: secretory structures, antibacterial and antioxidant activities. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Science, 38(2), 139-147. doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v38i2.28303
Andrade, E. H. A., Carreira, L. M. M., Silva, M. H. L., Silva, J. D., Bastos, C. N., Sousa, P. J. C., & Maia, J. G. S. (2008). Variability in essential-oil composition of Piper marginatum sensulato. Chemistry Biodiversity, 5(1), 197-208. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200890011
Andres, M. F., Rossa, G. E., Cassel, E., Vargas, R. M. F., Santana, O., Díaz, C. E., & González-Coloma, A. (2017). Biocidal effects of Piper hispidinervum (Piperaceae) essential oil and synergism among its main components. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 109(Pt 2), 1086-1092. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.04.017
Benelli, G., Pavela, R., Rakotosaona, R., Randrianarivo, E., Nicoletti, M., & Maggi, F. (2017). Chemical composition and insecticidal activity of the essential oil from Helichrysumfaradifani endemic to Madagascar. Natural Product Research, 32(14), 1690-1698. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2017.1396590
Candy, K., Nicolas, P., Andriantsoanirina, V., Izri, A., & Durand, R. (2018). In vitro efficacy of five essential oils against Pediculus humanus capitis. Parasitology Research, 117(2), 603-609. doi: 10.1007/s00436-017-5722-5
Carmona, R., Quijano-Celís, C. E., & Pino, J. A. (2009). Leaf oil composition of Bursera graveolens (Kunth) triana et planch. Journal of Essential Oil Research, 21(5), 387-389. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2009.9700199
Chaubey, M. K. (2012). Acute, lethal and synergistic effects of some terpenes against Triboliumcastaneum herbst (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Ecologia Balkanica, 4(1), 53-62.
Figueiredo, A. C., Barroso, J. G., Pedro, L. G., & Scheffer, J. J. (2008). Factors affecting secondary metabolite production in plants: volatile components and essential oils. FlavourFragrance Journal, 23(4), 213-226. doi: 10.1002/ffj.1875
Hollingsworth, R. (2005). Limonene, a citrus extract, for control of mealybugs and scale insects. Journal of Economic Entomology, 98(3), 772-779. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-98.3.772
Hu, J., Wang, W., & Dai, J. (2019). Chemical composition and biological activity against Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) of Artemisia brachyloba essential oil. Industrial Crops and Products, 128, 29-37. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2018.10.076
Ibrahim, M. A., Kainulainen, P., & Aflatuni, A. (2001). Insecticidal, repellent, antimicrobial activity and phytotoxicity of essential oils: With special reference to limonene and its suitability for control of insect pests.Agricultural and Food Science in Finland, 10(3), 243-259. doi: 10.23986/afsci.5697
Isman, M. B. (2006). Botanical insecticides, deterrents, and repellents in modern agriculture and an increasingly regulated world. Annual Review of Entomology, 51(1), 45-66. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151146
Isman, M. B. (2008). Botanical insecticides: For richer, for poorer. Pest Management Science, 64(1), 8-11. doi: 10.1002/ps.1470
Jaramillo-Colorado, B. E., Martelo, I. P., & Duarte, E. (2012). Antioxidant and repellent activities of the essential oil from Colombian Triphasia trifolia (Burm. f.) P. Wilson. Journal Agricultural Food Chemistry, 60(25), 6364-6368. doi: 10.1021/jf300461k
Jaramillo-Colorado, B., Duarte-Restrepo, E., & Jaimes, L. (2016). Bioactivity of Croton trinitatis Millsp Colombian essential oil. BoletínLatinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas, 15(4), 249-257.
Ju-Qin, C., Shan-Shan, G., Yang, W., Xue, P., Zhu-Feng, G., & Shu-Shan, D. (2018). Contact toxicity and repellency of essential oils from Evodia lenticellata Huang and Evodia rutaecarpa (Juss.) Benth. Leaves against three stored product insects. Journal of Oleo Science, 67(8), 1027-1034. doi: 10.5650/jos.ess17251
Kim, S. W., Kang, J., & Park, I. K. (2013). Fumigant toxicity of Apiaceae essential oils and their constituents against Sitophilus oryzae and their acetylcholinesterase inhibitory activity. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology, 16(4), 443-448. doi: 10.1016/j.aspen.2013.07.002
Liu, Z. L., Chu, S. S., & Jiang, G. H. (2011). Toxicity of Schizonpeta multifida essential oil and its constituent compounds towards two grain storage. Journal Science Food Agricultural, 91(5), 905-909. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.4263
López, M., & Pascual-Villalobos, M. (2010). Mode of inhibition of acetylcholinesterase by monoterpenoids and implications for pest control. Industrial Crops and Products, 31(2), 284-288. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2009.11.005
Luján-Hidalgo, M. C., Gutiérrez-Miceli, F. A., Ventura-Canseco, L. M. C., Dendooven, L., Mendoza-López, M. R., Cruz-Sánchez, S., … Abud-Archila, M. (2012). Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from leaves of Bursera graveolens and Taxodium mucronatum from Chiapas, Mexico. Gayana Botanica, 69, 7-14.
Malacrino, A., Campolo, O., Laudani, F., & Palmeri, V. (2016). Fumigant and repellent activity of limonene enantiomers against Tribolium confusum du Val. Neotropical Entomology, 45(5), 597-603. doi: 10.1007/s13744-016-0402-1
Manivannan, S. (2015). Toxicity of phosphine on the developmental stages of rust-red flour beetle, Triboliumcastaneum Herbst over a range of concentrations and exposures. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 52(10), 6810-6815. doi: 10.1007/s13197-015-1799-y
Manzano-Santana, I. P., Miranda, M., Gutiérrez, Y., García, G., Orellana, T., & Orellana, A. (2009). Efecto antiinflamatorio y composición química del aceite de ramas de Bursera graveolens Triana & Planch. (palo santo) de Ecuador. Revista Cubana de Plantas Medicinales, 14(3), 45-53.
Monzote, L., Hill, G. M., Cuellar, A., Scull, R., & Setzer, W. N. (2012). Chemical composition and anti-proliferative properties of Bursera graveolens essential oil lianet. Natural Products Communications, 7(11), 1531-1534. doi: 10.1177/1934578X1200701130
Muñoz-Acevedo, A., Serrano-Uribe, A., Parra-Navas, X., Olivares-Escobar, L. A., & Niño-Porras, M. E. (2013). Análisis multivariable y variabilidad química de los metabolitos volátiles presentes en las partes aéreas y la resina de Bursera graveolens (Kunth) Triana & Planch. de Soledad (Atlántico, Colombia). Boletín Latinoamericano y del Caribe de Plantas Medicinales y Aromáticas, 12(3), 322-337.
Nakanishi, T., Inatomi, Y., Murata, H., Shigeta, K., Iida, N., Inada, A., ... Oku, N. (2005). A new and known cytotoxic aryltetralin-type lignans from stems of Bursera graveolens. Chemical and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 53(2), 229-231. doi: 10.1248/cpb.53.229
Prieto, J. A., Patiño, O. J., Delgado, W. A., Moreno, J. P., & Cuca, L. E. (2011). Chemical composition, insecticidal, and antifungal activities of fruit essential oils of three Colombian Zanthoxylum species. Chilean Journal Agricultural Research, 71(1),73-82. doi: 10.4067/S0718-58392011000100009
Saad, M. M. G., El-Deeb, D. A., & Abdelgaleil, S. A. M. (2019). Insecticidal potential and repellent and biochemical effects of phenylpropenes and monoterpenes on the red flour beetle, Triboliumcastaneum Herbst.Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(7), 6801-6810. doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04151-z
Sotelo-Mendez, A. H., Figueroa-Cornejo, C. G., Césare-Coral, M. F., & Alegría-Arnedo, M. C. (2017). Chemical composition, antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of the essential oil of Bursera graveolens (Burseraceae) from Perú. Indian Journal of Pharmaceutical Education and Research, 51(3), S429-S433. doi: 10.5530/ijper.51.3s.62
Stamopoulos, D. C., Damos, P., & Karagianidou, G. (2007). Bioactivity of five monoterpenoid vapours to Tribolium confusum (du Val) (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Journal of Stored Products Research, 43(4), 571-577. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2007.03.007
Stefanazzi, N., Stadler, T., & Ferrero, A. (2011). Composition and toxic, repellent and feeding deterrent activity of essential oils against the stored-grain pests Triboliumcastaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae) and Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Pest Management Science, 67(6), 639-646. doi: 10.1002/ps.2102
Taban, A., Saharkhiz, M. J., & Hooshmandi, M. (2017). Insecticidal and repellent activity of three Satureja species against adult red flour beetles, Tribolium castaneum (Coleoptera: Tenebrionidae). Acta Ecologica Sinica, 37(3), 201-206. doi: 10.1016/j.chnaes.2017.01.001
Tapondjou, A. L., Adler, C., Fontem, D. A., Bouda, H., & Reichmuth, C. (2005). Bioactivities of cymol and essential oils of Cupressus sempervirens and Eucalyptus saligna against Sitophilus zeamais Motschlsky and Triboliumconfusum du Val. Journal of Stored Products Research, 41(1), 91-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jspr.2004.01.004
Young, D. G., Chao, S., Casabianca, H., Bertrand, M. C., & Minga, D. (2007). Essential oil of Bursera graveolens (Kunth) Triana et Planch from Ecuador. Journal of Essential Oil Research, 19(6), 525-526. doi: 10.1080/10412905.2007.9699322
Zúñiga, B., Guevara-Fefer, P., Herrera, J., Contreras, J. L., Velasco, L., Pérez, F. J., & Esquivel, B. (2005). Chemical composition and anti-inflammatory activity of the volatile fractions from the bark of eight Mexican Bursera species. Planta Medica, 71(9), 825-828. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-871293