Erratum
ERRATUM
ERRATA
Editora Mackenzie; Universidade Presbiteriana Mackenzie
In the paper “What tomorrow brings? Examining a model of antecedents of career expectations”, published in Revista de Administração Mackenzie - RAM (Mackenzie Management Review), 17(5), p. 36-60:
•At page 39, it should be read in Figure 1:
Figure I
STRUCTURAL MODEL PROPOSED
PPHRP = Positive perceptions of human resources policies and practices. Position type (managerial/non-managerial) works as a control variable and is omitted above to simplify the model representation.
Source: Elaborated by the authors.instead of:
Figure I
STRUCTURAL MODEL PROPOSED
PPHRP = Positive perceptions of human resources policies and practices. Position type (managerial/non-managerial) works as a control variable and is omitted above to simplify the model representation.
Source: Elaborated by the authors.•At page 50, it should be read in Figure 2:
Figure 2
STANDARDIZED CORFFICIENTS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURAL MODEL
PPHRP = Positive perceptions of human resources policies and practices. The control variable position type (managerial/non-managerial) was omitted to favor the model visualization. **p<o.oI.
Source: Elaborated by the authors.instead of:
Figure 2
STANDARDIZED CORFFICIENTS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURAL MODEL
PPHRP = Positive perceptions of human resources policies and practices. The control variable position type (managerial/non-managerial) was omitted to favor the model visualization. **p<o.oI.
Source: Elaborated by the authors.[Corrected article ] 10.1590/1678-69712016/administracao.v17n5p36-60
Figure I
STRUCTURAL MODEL PROPOSED
PPHRP = Positive perceptions of human resources policies and practices. Position type (managerial/non-managerial) works as a control variable and is omitted above to simplify the model representation.
Source: Elaborated by the authors.Figure I
STRUCTURAL MODEL PROPOSED
PPHRP = Positive perceptions of human resources policies and practices. Position type (managerial/non-managerial) works as a control variable and is omitted above to simplify the model representation.
Source: Elaborated by the authors.Figure 2
STANDARDIZED CORFFICIENTS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURAL MODEL
PPHRP = Positive perceptions of human resources policies and practices. The control variable position type (managerial/non-managerial) was omitted to favor the model visualization. **p<o.oI.
Source: Elaborated by the authors.Figure 2
STANDARDIZED CORFFICIENTS OF THE PROPOSED STRUCTURAL MODEL
PPHRP = Positive perceptions of human resources policies and practices. The control variable position type (managerial/non-managerial) was omitted to favor the model visualization. **p<o.oI.
Source: Elaborated by the authors.