Meeting the Challenges of Higher Education in India Through Open Educational Resources: Policies, Practices, and Implications
Enfrentando los retos de la educación superior a través de los Recursos Educativos Abiertos en India: Políticas, prácticas e implicaciones
Enfrentando os desafios da educação superior na Índia através do Recursos Educacionais Abertos: Políticas, práticas e implicações
Meeting the Challenges of Higher Education in India Through Open Educational Resources: Policies, Practices, and Implications
Education Policy Analysis Archives/Archivos Analíticos de Políticas Educativas, vol. 24, pp. 1-12, 2016
Arizona State University
Recepción: 31 Agosto 2014
Corregido: 08 Septiembre 2015
Aprobación: 30 Noviembre 2015
Resumen: En las dos últimas décadas el sector educativo en la India ha sufrido una gran transformación. Los avances recientes en la tecnología han facilitado el acceso a recursos educativos abiertos de alta calidad e información en Internet. El artículo analiza el rol de los recursos educativos abiertos (REA) para resolver los desafíos de la educación superior en India, que incluye desde las disparidades geográficas en el acceso a la educación a la escasez de docentes formados y cualificados. Los autores examinan y discuten varias iniciativas de REA que están realizando esfuerzos en la India con el fin de crear fuertes mecanismos institucionales para superar los desafíos educativos del país a través de un marco estratégico nacional diseñado para mejorar el acceso a la educación superior de alta calidad. Los autores examinan estas iniciativas diseñadas para aumentar el acceso a la educación a través de REA, así como aquellas dirigidas a desarrollar habilidades relacionadas con los REA para los educadores. El artículo concluye con una discusión de las implicaciones de estas iniciativas para el desarrollo de las prácticas educativas abiertas en la India.
Palabras clave: Recursos Educativos Abiertos, India, educación superior, política, tasa bruta de matriculación, Twelfth Five Year Plan, igualdad de oportunidades educativas, materiales de instrucción y practicas.
Abstract: Over the past two decades, the education sector in India has undergone a substantial transformation. Recent advances in technology have provided access to high quality educational resources and information on the Internet. This article examines the role of open educational resources (OER) in addressing the challenges of higher education in India, which range from geographical disparities in access to education, to shortages of trained and qualified faculty. The authors examine and discuss several OER initiatives that are currently advancing India’s efforts to create strong institutional mechanisms to overcome the country’s educational challenges through a national strategic framework designed to improve access to quality higher education. The authors explore these initiatives designed to increase access to education through OER, as well as those designed to develop OER-related skills for educators. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of these initiatives for the development of open educational practices in India.
Keywords: Open Education Resources, India, higher education, public policy, gross enrollment ratio, Twelfth Five Year Plan, equal educational opportunity, instructional materials and practices.
Palavras chave: Recursos Educacionais Abertos, Índia, educação superior, política, gross enrollment ratio, Twelfth Five Year Plan, igualdade de oportunidades educacionais, materiais de ensino y praticas
Introduction
Access to quality education has been a cause for major concern for successive Indian governments. In 2007, legislation was enacted to promote universal education, namely the Right To Education Act, which lays out a comprehensive vision for raising the education profile of Indian children (GIPC, 2007). While the right to education exists officially, India continues to face challenges to actualizing its goal of equitable access to quality education. These challenges include geographical and demographic barriers that inhibit access to educational institutions (GIPC, 2013; Lall, 2005), and a shortage of qualified educators (CARRHE, 2009). Such barriers are escalated by outdated facilities, overcrowded classrooms, outmoded teaching methods, and declining research standards (CARRHE, 2009; Kanwar, Balasubramanian, & Umar, 2010; Lall, 2005; Stella, 2002).
The growth of India’s population indicates that access to education will continue to be a major concern. Currently, over 500 million Indians are age 5 to 25 years old. There are nearly 14.6 million students enrolled in 31,000 institutions, and currently there are about 700 universities. With the largest K-12 population globally, India will have the largest population in the higher education age bracket by 2030 (World Bank, 2012). It is expected that the number of eligible students will double by 2020, indicating an enormous gap between demand for higher education and its supply.
sIn this context, the National Knowledge Commission (NKC), which is charged with proposing education policy to the Indian government, recommended in 2007 that the role of OER be elevated as a means for supporting access to quality education for all, for example, through the establishment of faculty professional development programs on OER creation and use (NKC, 2009). The NKC recommendation furthers the Indian government’s Right to Education (RTE) vision for promoting universal education, which aligns with the strategic framework for educational policy articulated in the national economic program known as the Twelfth Five Year Plan. Central to this strategic framework are the Three E’s of higher education: Expansion, Equity, and Excellence (GIPC, 2013). The present article explores the progress achieved to date by some of the OER initiatives that are involved in achieving the Three E’s in Indian higher education. The article concludes with a discussion of the implications of these initiatives for the development of open educational practices in India.
OER Initiatives to Meet the Challenges of Education in India
Pursuant to the NKC recommendations on OER for India’s institutions of higher education, multiple projects to support OER access, creation and use have been initiated across the country. These initiatives, discussed below, have served to advance India’s efforts to create strong institutional mechanisms to overcome the country’s educational challenges. Unless otherwise noted, the discussion draws upon a literature review and first-hand information obtained by the present authors through direct association with the projects. The authors examine and discuss several OER initiatives.
Initiatives to Increase Educational Access through OER
At the national level, several initiatives aim to advance India’s strategic framework for Expansion, Equity, and Excellence in higher education, by increasing the availability of quality educational content via OER. For example, the National Council for Educational Research and Training (NCERT) provides free online textbooks to support the National Curriculum Framework that NCERT helped to develop in 2005. Similarly, teachers and learners have free access to supplementary curriculum-based content provided by the National Science Digital Library, due to an initiative of the Council for Scientific and Industrial Research.
OER content to supplement classroom teaching at the undergraduate college level is made publically available by the Consortium for Educational Communication (CEC), an inter-university center of the University Grants Commission. The CEC produces English language educational video programs in disciplines ranging from literature to medical science, based on prescribed syllabi.
Archived in a learning object repository, the programs are freely available for viewing on a Higher Education Satellite Channel called Vyas channel. Vyas was established in 2004 with the mission of bridging the knowledge and information gap by bringing higher education content to a large number of viewers across millions of households and classrooms nationwide. Plans to release materials in India’s 22 different local languages are in progress.
Free, open, online engineering courses are also available, as part of a joint project by the National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL), the Indian Institutes of Technology, and the Indian Institute of Science. Funded by the Ministry of Human Resources and Development and the Government of India, faculty created over 200 video recordings of English language lectures in engineering to improve the quality of technical education in India (Harishankar, 2012; NPTEL, 2012).
The NPETL program operates under the auspices of the National Mission of Education, which stipulates the use of information and communications technology to support fair use of all content produced and to promote its reusability. To this end, NPTEL content is licensed through Creative Commons terms (CC-BY-SA), requiring attribution and allowing for copy and redistribution as well as adaptive transformation, provided that all adaptations are issued under the same license as the original (NPETL, 2007). Originally intended as a sequence of stand-alone lectures to be broadcast nationwide, the NPTEL engineering lectures are currently being edited into smaller units with keyword indexing, to allow them to be more readily re-purposed across a variety of contexts (Harishankar, 2012). For instance, faculty in regional engineering colleges may formulate new lectures around portions of the NPTEL lectures (Harishankar, 2012).
In a related initiative, consolidating a shift away from discrete lectures toward entire, cohesive courses, IIT-Bombay launched three massive open online courses (MOOCs) in 2014 (Pushkar, 2014). These lecture-based courses, Introduction to Computer Programming, Part 1 and 2, and Thermodynamics, are slated for national accreditation. Enrolment in MOOCs is considered a method for increasing access to higher education as reflected in the Gross Enrolment Ratio, which currently stands at less than 20% for India--as compared to the global average of 27% (Pushkar, 2014). MOOCs also represent a broadband alternative to investing in physical infrastructure in remote areas (Pushkar, 2014).
Through the aforementioned initiatives, quality educational resources and courses have become increasingly available to students throughout India. These initiatives harness technology toward improving the quality of higher education available nationwide. They also contribute to national goals for expansion of education through widespread use of distance learning, thereby helping to address the shortage of trained and qualified faculty in India (GIPC, 2013).
Additionally, at a national level, educators throughout India are coming together to share resources and collaborate via the India chapter of WikiEducator. Established in 2008, WikiEducator-India began with the aim of making educational materials freely available toward the realization of a completely free version of the national education curriculum by 2015. Many universities, such as University of Mumbai, Acharya Narendradev College, Delhi University, Teerthanker Mahaveer University (TMU), are currently using and sharing content on WikiEducator.
WikiEducator has helped to build national OER capacity and has helped to foster the development of an “open” ethic in higher education, increasing knowledge sharing and collaboration—with more than 21,000 articles currently available for free on the site. Many educators have created courses and shared them with others.
Initiatives to Develop OER Skills
Recent initiatives to develop OER skills for educators, administrators, and subject matter experts have begun to address national goals for education expansion as well as challenges related to geographically disparate school distribution and rapidly growing populations. Several of these initiatives are discussed below.
Post Graduate Diploma in e-Learning (PGDEL). Founded in 1985, with the goal of providing higher education opportunities particularly to the disadvantaged segments of society, Indira Gandhi National Open University (IGNOU) is the largest open university in the world. IGNOU has long been involved in encouraging, coordinating and setting standards for distance and open education in India (Mythili, 2014).
IGNOU’s Post Graduate Diploma in e-Learning (PGDEL) was specially designed for online learning and conceptualized as an OER-based curriculum (Mythili, 2014). Offered through IGNOU’s Staff Training and Research Institute of Distance Education (STRIDE), the year long program involves five practical and theoretical courses designed to build skills necessary to learners seeking to become online educators or administrators of e-Learning (Mythili, 2014).
develop new educational content. During that phase, only 50 students were enrolled, due to a limited number of licenses available for a proprietary video conference included in the program (Mythili, 2014). According to a case study on the program by Mythili (2014), learners initially struggled with using static PDF materials, having expected more interactive multimedia materials. Additionally, the case study revealed a need on behalf of learners and course teams for better guidelines and quality assurance metadata to help them in identifying appropriate learning materials. Overall, the program was found to be successful in reducing the training time involved in professional development, with concomitant cost reduction attributed to the use of OER (Ibid). Graduates of PGDEL are qualified to work toward meeting national goals for education expansion through distance learning programs (GIPC, 2013), which will help to address the challenges of geographically disparate school distribution and rapidly growing populations (World Bank, 2012).
Teacher Education through School-based Support in India (TESS-India). The TESSIndia project was initiated in November 2012 by The Open University in the UK and is funded by the Department for Funding International Development (DFID). The project focuses on providing professional development for educators in Indian states where education is in very poor condition— including Bihar, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Odisha, Karnataka, Assam and West Bengal—with the goal of improving the quality and quantity of teacher education in India (TESS-India, 2012).
The project produces high-quality teacher development units (TDUs) and leadership development units (LDUs) designed to support teachers and school leaders in improving learning in their classrooms and schools. These units are made available online as OER, having been first localized for use according to state-specific terms, which tailor the units linguistically and culturally. To address infrastructural and technical challenges, the units are also made available through the alternative lower-tech medium of small “flash memory” cards, which retain data in the absence of a power supply.
TESS-India embeds OER throughout its teacher education programs, so that educators develop firsthand experience with learning through OER and acquire familiarity with web-based resources and online possibilities for knowledge sharing. The program also conducts regular workshops to support educators in adopting student-centered active learning pedagogies based on OER.
As a teacher education program, TESS-India contributes to India’s national Three E’s framework agenda by expanding access to professional training and support in isolated rural areas of India (GIPC, 2013), and by providing educators with high quality localized OER as well as the pedagogical skills and knowledge necessary to promote improved learning through the use of OER. In particular, TESS-India focuses on developing productive synergies by combining teaching with research, and encouraging learner-centric pedagogies that accord with national goals for achieving excellence in education (GIPC, 2013).
The National Institute for Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development. A premier organization of the India’s Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship, the National Institute for Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development (NIESBUD) has introduced several OER-based skill development programs in partnership with a U.S.-based organization, Progia LLC (NIESBUD, n.d.).
The programs, initiated in 2014, included a hands-on workshop to train participants in the use of OER for creating online courses. This workshop targeted educators, trainers, subject matter experts and entrepreneurs. Offered for a fee, the one-day workshop included instruction in finding, adapting, and using OER, as well as an overview of OER licensing. Workshop participants prepared a sample course using OER, and practiced localizing text and video according to the identified level and learning needs of their students. To date, the program has conducted over nine such hands-on workshops, and more will be offered going forward (NIESBUD, 2014).
OER MOOC. LMP Education Trust with support from Commonwealth of Learning (COL) conducted the first ever MOOC on OER in India, titled “The OER MOOC” (Pant, et al., 2014). Designed to equip participants with knowledge and skills for effective OER use, the program included workshops on OER adoption and modification, as well as OER creation and sharing. The four-week program allowed flexibility and personalization, including an optional additional two weeks to complete the course if needed. Participants entered with varying objectives, from how to support effective student learning through OER, to how to tailor OER within courses to meet the needs of lifelong learners. The MOOC facilitated the formation of discussion groups and forums centered upon common interests and pursuits, helping to cultivate networks of colleagues and partners nationwide.
Conclusion: Implications for Open Education Practices in India
The foregoing discussion highlights several significant OER initiatives that are part of a national strategic framework designed to improve access to quality higher education, and that are transforming the higher education sector in India. Through the use of OER, the major challenges of higher education have begun to be addressed. Various OER-based models for open education practices have begun to impact policy and planning, as stakeholders including educators, researchers, teachers, and students have realized the benefits of OER in terms of cost reduction, availability of content, and access to material. OER and open educational practices in general have given many organizations the opportunity to provide quality education to a large population. Through multiple approaches—both top-down and bottom-up—involving various institutional partnerships and professional networks around OER, India has begun to make progress toward addressing the challenges facing higher education, and also helped to ensure a national basis for a self sustaining OER movement that enlists and synchronizes the creative, synergetic energies of educators and policy makers toward the realization of the nationally voiced goals articulated in the strategic framework of Expansion, Equity, and Excellence.
Although there has been work resulting in the development of new OER content and teaching skills, and millions of learners have been reached nationwide, many educators and policymakers in India remain unaware of OER and its potential for improving both teaching and learning. Policymakers in the education domain would benefit from being made aware of the advantages of OER in supporting enhanced, more equitable access to education. As noted by Harishankar (2012), an overarching code of sharing and collaboration is required to sustain successful OER implementation in higher education, which must be supported by institutional stakeholders at all levels to achieve maximum efficiency in the development and dissemination of quality educational resources. Increased awareness of and support for the integration of OER throughout the national education sector will enable India to further its national goal of providing quality higher education for all.
Referencias
Committee to Advise on Renovation and Rejuvenation of Higher Education (CARRHE) (2009). Report of The Committee to Advise on Renovation and Rejuvenation of Higher Education [a.k.a. Yash Pal Committee Report].
Government of India, Department of Higher Education. Retrieved from http://www.academics-india.com/Yashpal-committee-report.pdf
Government of India, Planning Commission (GIPC) (2007). 11th Five Year Plan. [Draft report of working group on higher education]. Retrieved from http://www.aicteindia. org/downloads/higher_education_XIplan.pdf
Government of India, Planning Commission (GIPC) (2013). Twelfth Five Year Plan (2012-2017), Social Sectors, Volume 3. Retrieved from http://mhrd.gov.in/sites/upload_files/mhrd/files/documentreports/ XIIFYP_SocialSector.pdf
Harishankar, B.V. (2012). Tracing the trajectory of OER in India: Reflections on three initiatives. In Glennie, J., Harley, K., Butcher, N., & van Wyk, T. (Eds.) Open Educational Resources and Change in Higher Education: Reflections from Practice (pp. 41-56). Vancouver: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved from http://oldwebsite.col.org/PublicationDocuments/pub_PS_OER_web.pdf
Kanwar, A., Balasubramanian, K., & Umar, A. (2010). Toward sustainable open education resources: A perspective from the global south. American Journal of Distance Education, 24(2), 65-80.
Lall, M. (2005). The challenges for India’s education system. [Briefing paper, Asia Programme, ASP BP 05/03]. Chatham House, Royal Institute of International Affairs. Retrieved from http://marielall.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/Chatham-house-indiaeducation.pdf
Mythili, G. (2014). Indira Gandhi National Open University OER-based Post Graduate Diploma in e-Learning, in S. Naidu and S. Mishra (Eds.), Case studies on OER-based learning (pp. 11-24). New Delhi: Commonwealth Educational Media Center for Asia (CEMCA). Retrieved from http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/561/CaseStudies_OERbased_ eLearning.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
National Knowledge Commission (NKC) (2009). Report to the nation. Retrieved from http://www.aicte-india.org/downloads/nkc.pdf
National Institute for Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development (NIESBUD) (n.d.). About. Retrieved from http://niesbudelearning.info/About.aspx
National Institute for Entrepreneurship and Small Business Development (NIESBUD) (2014). Workshop on creating skill development courses using OER. Retrieved from http://niesbud.nic.in/Workshop-on-Creating-Skill-Development-Courses-using- OER.htm
National Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL). (2007). Creative commons license notes. Retrieved from http://nptel.ac.in/pdf/
CCLIcenseNotes.pdfNational Programme on Technology Enhanced Learning (NPTEL). (2012). NPTEL document. Retrieved from http://nptel.ac.in/pdf/NPTELDocument.pdf
Pant, M. M., Kaushik, M., Jasola, S., and Sharma, R.C. (2014). OER: Disruptive innovative solution to the challenges of education. Sub-theme 4: Innovation. Paper presented at the 2nd Regional Symposium on Open Educational Resources, Wawasan Open University, Malaysia.
Pushkar. (2014, August 13). MOOCs could be the answer for world’s largest student population. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from http://www.hindustantimes.com/analysis/moocscould- be-the-answer-for-world-s-largest-student-population/article1-1251878.aspx
Sharma, R. C. (Feb, 2013). Open educational resources: Development and challenges for India [slides]. Retrived from http://www.slideshare.net/rc_sharma/open-educationalresources- development-and-challenges-for-india
Stella, A. (2002). External quality assurance in Indian higher education: Case study of the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC). Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.
TESS-India (n.d.). About TESS-India. Retrieved from http://www.tess-india.edu.in/about-tessindia World Bank. (2012).
World Bank report on education in India. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/en/country/india
Appendix A
education policy analysis archives
editorial board
Lead Editor: Audrey Amrein-Beardsley (Arizona State University)
Executive Editor: Gustavo E. Fischman (Arizona State University)
Associate Editors: Sherman Dorn, David R. Garcia, Oscar Jimenez-Castellanos,
Eugene Judson, Jeanne M. Powers (Arizona State University)
Cristina Alfaro San Diego State
University
Ronald Glass University of
California, Santa Cruz
R. Anthony Rolle University of
Houston
Gary Anderson New York
University
Jacob P. K. Gross University of
Louisville
A. G. Rud Washington State
University
Michael W. Apple University of
Wisconsin, Madison
Eric M. Haas WestEd Patricia Sánchez University of
University of Texas, San Antonio
Jeff Bale OISE, University of
Toronto, Canada
Julian Vasquez Heilig California
State University, Sacramento
Janelle Scott University of
California, Berkeley
Aaron Bevanot SUNY Albany Kimberly Kappler Hewitt University
of North Carolina Greensboro
Jack Schneider College of the
Holy Cross
David C. Berliner Arizona
State University
Aimee Howley Ohio University Noah Sobe Loyola University
Henry Braun Boston College Steve Klees University of Maryland Nelly P. Stromquist University
of Maryland
Casey Cobb University of
Connecticut
Jaekyung Lee
SUNY Buffalo
Benjamin Superfine University of
Illinois, Chicago
Arnold Danzig San Jose State
University
Jessica Nina Lester
Indiana University
Maria Teresa Tatto
Michigan State University
Linda Darling-Hammond
Stanford University
Amanda E. Lewis University of
Illinois, Chicago
Adai Tefera Virginia
Commonwealth University
Elizabeth H. DeBray University of
Georgia
Chad R. Lochmiller Indiana
University
Tina Trujillo University of
California, Berkeley
Chad d'Entremont Rennie Center
for Education Research & Policy
Christopher Lubienski University
of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Federico R. Waitoller University
of Illinois, Chicago
John Diamond University of
Wisconsin, Madison
Sarah Lubienski University of
Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Larisa Warhol
University of Connecticut
Matthew Di Carlo Albert Shanker
Institute
William J. Mathis University of
Colorado, Boulder
John Weathers University of
Colorado, Colorado Springs
Michael J. Dumas University of
California, Berkeley
Michele S. Moses University of
Colorado, Boulder
Kevin Welner University of
Colorado, Boulder
Kathy Escamilla University of
Colorado, Boulder
Julianne Moss Deakin
University, Australia
Terrence G. Wiley Center
for Applied Linguistics
Melissa Lynn Freeman Adams
State College
Sharon Nichols University of Texas,
San Antonio
John Willinsky
Stanford University
Rachael Gabriel
University of Connecticut
Eric Parsons University of
Missouri-Columbia
Jennifer R. Wolgemuth
University of South Florida
Amy Garrett Dikkers University
of North Carolina, Wilmington
Susan L. Robertson Bristol
University, UK
Kyo Yamashiro Claremont
Graduate University
Gene V Glass Arizona
State University
Gloria M. Rodriguez
University of California, Davis
Appendix B
archivos analíticos de políticas educativas
consejo editorial
Editor Ejecutivo: Gustavo E. Fischman (Arizona State University)
Editores Asociados: Armando Alcántara Santuario (Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México), Jason Beech,
(Universidad de San Andrés), Antonio Luzon, Universidad de Granada
Claudio Almonacid
Universidad Metropolitana de
Ciencias de la Educación, Chile
Juan Carlos González Faraco
Universidad de Huelva, España
Miriam Rodríguez Vargas
Universidad Autónoma de
Tamaulipas, México
Miguel Ángel Arias Ortega
Universidad Autónoma de la
Ciudad de México
María Clemente Linuesa
Universidad de Salamanca, España
José Gregorio Rodríguez
Universidad Nacional de
Colombia, Colombia
Xavier Besalú Costa
Universitat de Girona, España
Jaume Martínez Bonafé
Universitat de València, España
Mario Rueda Beltrán Instituto
de Investigaciones sobre la
Universidad y la Educación,
UNAM, México
Xavier Bonal Sarro Universidad
Autónoma de Barcelona, España
Alejandro Márquez Jiménez
Instituto de Investigaciones sobre la
Universidad y la Educación, UNAM,
México
José Luis San Fabián Maroto
Universidad de Oviedo,
España
Antonio Bolívar Boitia
Universidad de Granada, España
María Guadalupe Olivier Tellez,
Universidad Pedagógica Nacional,
México
Jurjo Torres Santomé,
Universidad de la Coruña, España
José Joaquín Brunner Universidad
Diego Portales, Chile
Miguel Pereyra Universidad de
Granada, España
Yengny Marisol Silva Laya
Universidad Iberoamericana,
México
Damián Canales Sánchez
Instituto Nacional para la
Evaluación de la Educación, México
Mónica Pini Universidad Nacional
de San Martín, Argentina
Juan Carlos Tedesco
Universidad Nacional de San
Martín, Argentina
Gabriela de la Cruz Flores
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de
México
Omar Orlando Pulido Chaves
Instituto para la Investigación
Educativa y el Desarrollo Pedagógico
(IDEP)
Ernesto Treviño Ronzón
Universidad Veracruzana, México
Marco Antonio Delgado Fuentes
Universidad Iberoamericana,
México
José Luis Ramírez Romero
Universidad Autónoma de Sonora,
México
Ernesto Treviño Villarreal
Universidad Diego Portales
Santiago, Chile
Inés Dussel, DIE-CINVESTAV,
México
Paula Razquin Universidad de San
Andrés, Argentina
Antoni Verger Planells
Universidad Autónoma de
Barcelona, España
Pedro Flores Crespo Universidad
Iberoamericana, México
José Ignacio Rivas Flores
Universidad de Málaga, España
Catalina Wainerman
Universidad de San Andrés,
Argentina
Ana María García de Fanelli
Centro de Estudios de Estado y
Sociedad (CEDES) CONICET,
Argentina
Juan Carlos Yáñez Velazco
Universidad de Colima, México
Appendix C
arquivos analíticos de políticas educativas
conselho editorial
Editor Executivo: Gustavo E. Fischman (Arizona State University)
Editoras Associadas: Geovana Mendonça Lunardi Mendes (Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina),
Marcia Pletsch, Sandra Regina Sales (Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro)
Almerindo Afonso
Universidade do Minho
Portugal
Alexandre Fernandez Vaz
Universidade Federal de Santa
Catarina, Brasil
José Augusto Pacheco
Universidade do Minho, Portugal
Rosanna Maria Barros Sá
Universidade do Algarve
Portugal
Regina Célia Linhares Hostins
Universidade do Vale do Itajaí,
Brasil
Jane Paiva
Universidade do Estado do Rio de
Janeiro, Brasil
Maria Helena Bonilla
Universidade Federal da Bahia
Brasil
Alfredo Macedo Gomes
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Brasil
Paulo Alberto Santos Vieira
Universidade do Estado de Mato
Grosso, Brasil
Rosa Maria Bueno Fischer
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
do Sul, Brasil
Jefferson Mainardes
Universidade Estadual de Ponta
Grossa, Brasil
Fabiany de Cássia Tavares Silva
Universidade Federal do Mato
Grosso do Sul, Brasil
Alice Casimiro Lopes
Universidade do Estado do Rio de
Janeiro, Brasil
Jader Janer Moreira Lopes
Universidade Federal Fluminense e
Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora,
Brasil
António Teodoro
Universidade Lusófona
Portugal
Suzana Feldens Schwertner
Centro Universitário Univates
Brasil
Debora Nunes
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
do Norte, Brasil
Lílian do Valle
Universidade do Estado do Rio de
Janeiro, Brasil
Flávia Miller Naethe Motta
Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de
Janeiro, Brasil
Alda Junqueira Marin
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de
São Paulo, Brasil
Alfredo Veiga-Neto
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande
do Sul, Brasil
Dalila Andrade Oliveira
Universidade Federal de Minas
Gerais, Brasil