HTML

ePub

PDF

INTRODUCTION

The study of terminological vocabulary related to different scientific fields, ensuring its use is one of the most relevant topics in Tatar linguistics. There is an increased interest in the problems of industry terminology, to issues in the field of terminology, terminography, etc in modern linguistics of the last decade. Technical and terminological vocabulary is also actively investigated in this context. In the Tatar linguistics’ terms of many technical branches (terms of mathematics, chemistry, physics, jewelry) are investigated, terminological dictionaries are published: «Russian-Tatar dictionary-minimum for oil industry workers» (1996), «Russian- Tatar dictionary for chemical industry workers» (1996), «Russian-Tatar medical dictionary», «Russian-Tatar oilfield dictionary» (2004), «Management dictionary» (2006). It is well known that despite the existing system of terminological vocabulary of the Tatar language its practical application is experiencing some difficulties associated with extralinguistic, sociolinguistic factors (Govindasamy andi Kwe, 2020; Tarman, 2016; Newton et al., 2020; Abulhanova et al., 2019; Lehoux et al., 2019; Nureeva et al., 2019; Saifullova et al., 2018).

Numerous studies of the Tatar language`s terminological layer (Akhmetyanov: 2015, p.543; Galieva etal.: 2016, pp.36 – 37; Sagdieva et al., 2019; Galimyanov & Suleymanov: 2013, pp.61-69; Musina: 2012, p.25; Nikolaeva: 2005, p.25; Tezina: 2006, pp.208-210; Khairullin: 2006, pp.43 – 46; Tsvetkova et al.: 2019, pp.598- 612; Humbatova & Hajiyev: 2019, pp.1704-1727; Lysytsia, et al., 2019; Ivanova et al., 2019; Shamseeva: 2009, pp.147-151; Saenko et al.: 2019, pp.332-345; Saenko et al.: 2020, pp.88-103; Wildes, 2020; Gapsalamov et al.: 2020, pp.874-883; Akim:2019, pp.1408-1428; Shamsutdinova: 2000, p.219; Gorovaya et al.: 2017, pp.1201-1210; Volchik & Maslyukova: 2019, pp.1444-1455) confirm that the Tatar language has a coherent terminological system. This is especially important, since "terms define the essence of scientific discoveries, reflect the content of developing areas of knowledge, convey recreated and already existing concepts in science and technology, serve as the name of new objects and phenomena” (Shamseeva: 2009, Villalobos et al.: 2018; Rincón et al.: 2019; Annía et al.: 2019). The study of terms can be multifaceted, multidimensional. This work examines word-formation possibilities of the Tatar language, the significance of this area is determined by several factors, including the fact that "there is a certain relationship between the structure of terms and time of their appearance, as well as between the degree of knowledge`s field development and means of formation her terms” (Grinev-Grinevich: 2008, p.122).

Moreover, the description of terms` formal types is a traditional component of most terminological studies. The study of terminology sources of the Tatar language, the justification of its antiquity contributes to the confirmation of the historical process duration of language formation as a scientific one. Thus, the purpose of this study is the potential of the Tatar language as the language of science; as a language, with its ancient sources of term formation and actively using borrowings from other languages; as language, having a huge word-formative opportunities in the area of terminology that is impossible not to appreciate today, when "as a result of "information explosion" and accelerate the growth of scientific knowledge has occurred "terminological explosion" – a sharp increase in the number of terms” (Grinev-Grinevich: 2008, p.6). It should be remembered that the terminological vocabulary is subject to very high requirements, including, according to S. Grinev-Grinevich, such as:

«-value requirements:

1. 1. Consistency of semantics;
2. 2. Unambiguity;
3. 3. Full meaning;
4. 4. Lack of synonyms.

- Requirements to the form:

1. 1. Compliance with language standards;
2. 2. Lexical and formal brevity;
3. 3. Derivational ability;
4. 4. Invariance;
5. 5. Motivation.

- Pragmatic requirements:

1. 1. Introduction (acceptance, use);
2. 2. Internationality;
3. 3. Modernity;
4. 4. Euphony;
5. 5. Esotericity» (Grinev-Grinevich: 2008, pp.36-37).

At the same time, scientists believe that to a small extent deviation from these requirements can be observed, and this should be considered acceptable. Some requirements are relevant to a particular technical or scientific field and are not relevant to others. For example, esotericity, that is, the deliberate inaccessibility of medical terminology is due to the purpose of setting a barrier to self-treatment.

As a result, the above confirms the relevance of Tatar terminology`s study.

METHODS

The subject of this study is the terminological vocabulary of the Tatar language. The terminology of the language is presented in different dictionaries, belongs to very different scientific fields. We considered biological, mathematical, psychological and pedagogical, chemical, legal and other terms. It was important to present the terminological layer of the Tatar vocabulary as an illustration of its genetic roots, the term-forming potential of the language during the selection of language material.

RESULTS

The first official text on the ordering and systematization of the Tatar language term-making appeared only in 1920, at the all-Russian conference of East journalists (Galimyanov & Suleymanov: 2013). Since then, attempts to systematize term formation in different scientific, technical and other fields have been made repeatedly.

Such methods of word formation as semantic, morphological, syntactic and morphological-syntactic are actively involved in the generation of Tatar terminology.

As a semantic method, scientists consider the terminologization of a common word, borrowing foreign lexemes and term elements, metaphorization of a common word`s meaning, etc. (Grinev-Grinevich: 2008). Such a way as the terminologization of a common word generates the ancient terms, such as балчык – clay, алтын – gold, туфрак – soil etc. Terms formed by metaphorizing a common word are not as frequent, but occur in different areas. For example, the anatomical term snail is formed in this way – әкәм-төкәм (part of the inner ear responsible for the perception of sounds).

The generation of terminological vocabulary of the Tatar language becomes possible because of different word-forming means of the language. A number of terms are formed in a lexico-semantic way, that is, in such a way that a new term is formed as a result of the word disintegration into homonyms. Таким способом образованы географический термин The geographical term is formed in this way бугаз (strait), grammatical terms рәвеш (adverb), тартым (possessive case), ия (subject), zoological term саулык (young ewe), medical term төче (lupus) etc.

E. Akhunzyanov in his work "Russian borrowings in the Tatar language" notes the great role of calculusin the replenishment of the modern Tatar language vocabulary (Akhunzyanov: 1968). In terminological vocabulary this statement is fully confirmed, in the language abound and complete calques (өскорма – superstructure, орлыгашар – megastigmus, умырткаара дисклар – intervertebral disc) and half calques (фотокаршылык – photometer, кристаллашу – crystallization, серкә көпшәсе – pollen tube).

The morphological method of term formation in the Tatar language is advisable to see in the example of terms formed by affixation and conversion.Affixation is one of the most active ways of word formation. Active word-forming models of term-making in different scientific fields are:

-Stem + -ча/-чә: кисәкчә – particella (ling.), сызыкча – hyphen (ling.);

-Steam + -чы/-че: гоминьданчы – member of the Kuomintang (hist.), нефтьче – oilman;

- Steam + -ма/-мә: эремә – solution (chem.), орынма – tangent (math.); аңлатма – formula (math.);

- Steam + -гыч/-геч, -кыч/-кеч: оксидлаштыргыч – oxidant (chem.), йоткыч – absorbent;

- Steam + ач/-әч/-ч: серкәч – тычинка (bot.);

- Steam +-лар/-ләр: ауксоторфлар – auxotrophs (biol.); тозлар – salt (chem.)

- Steam +-лык/-лек: семьялык – family (biol.), бердәйлек – identity (math.);

- Steam + -гыч/-геч, -кыч/-кеч: оксидлаштыргыч – oxidant (chem.), йоткыч – absorbent;

- Steam + ач/-әч/-ч: серкәч – тычинка (bot.);

- Steam +-лар/-ләр: ауксоторфлар – auxotrophs (biol.); тозлар – salt (chem.)

- Steam +-лык/-лек: семьялык – family (biol.), бердәйлек – identity (math.);

- Steam + нигез + -ландыр/-ләндер: күкертсезләндерү – desolforazione (chem.)

Steam +-ыш/-еш/-ш: күренеш – phenomenon, ясалыш – formation, тигезләнеш – balance (phys.); Steam + -ым/-ем: сыем – tank, утырым – residue (chem.);Steam +-выч/-веч: ялгавыч – commutatore, саклавыч – fuse;Steam +-лы/-ле: газлы – gassy (chem.), галогенлы – haloid (chem.), селтеле – alkaline (chem.); Steam +-ла/-лә: хлорла – chlorinate, рафинадла – refine etc.

It is worth noting: the activity of an affix in term formation sometimes depends on the terminological field. So, M. M. Nikolaeva emphasizes that in the field of criminal law term formation is possible only by means of affixes -лык/-лек, -чы/-че, -ма/-мә (Nikolaeva: 2005, p.21).

Part of the Tatar language terminological vocabulary is formed by conversion. These are such units asterms actively used in the chemical field: алтын (gold) – алтын (golden), in the mathematics: бүлүче (dividing)бүлүче (divider), in the economy: кулланучы (using) – кулланучы (user).

Let is consider morphological and syntactic ways of term formation.

Addition of bases is a productive way of word formation in many scientific areas: botany, geography, etc. For example: агалтын (lit. white + gold) – platinum, җимешкорткыч (lit. fruit + pest) – Appledore, сыеклыкүлчәгеч (lit. liquid + meter) – pitometer, үзгәрешүлчәгеч (lit. variation + meter) – variometer etc.

The peculiarity of word formation in the Tatar language are paired words. The researchers note: "Pairedwords are a very interesting and at the same time specific phenomenon for Turkic languages. In Russian and other European languages this category of words is fragmentary and its use is limited to purely colloquial speech” (Mannapova: 2008, p.188). In the Tatar language paired words can also form a terminological layer of vocabulary. For example: оксидлашу-кайтарылу (рекциясе) – redox (reaction), керем-чыгым – debit- credit etc.

Abbreviation is also a way of generating new terms, most often it is a calque of Russian terms- abbreviations. For example: ЭЭО (Эчке эшләр органнары – Department of Internal Affairs DIA), ЭЙК (Электр йөртү көче – electromotive force EMF). Of course, the main task of abbreviations is to save oral speech and written text. While pronouncing the abbreviation, the sound time is five times shorter than the corresponding phrase, and when writing, the savings are even more impressive. Tatar terminology contains both graphic and lexical types of structural abbreviations. Graphic abbreviations in written text are represented as symbols, abbreviated words or phrases, in oral speech they are used in full form. Let`s give an example: ß-кисәкчекләр (ß-particles) – full name бета-кисәкчекләр (beta particles). Lexical abbreviations are formed by simultaneous reduction and addition. When pronouncing the abbreviated form is preserved. For example, abbreviation ДҮ (DP) formed from the term диэлектрик үткәрүчәнлек (dielectric permittivity), in writing and in oral pronunciation preference is given to the short form of the term.

Very frequent in the Tatar language terms-phrases, which are considered by us as terms, formed syntactically. Terms, as words, naming special objects and phenomena are very complex and diverse, so they have code units not only in the form of words, but also in the form of phrases. The researchers note the dominance of terminological phrases (compound terms) over one-word terms in all terminology of European languages (Nikolaeva: 2005). Let is focus on the component composition of such phrases. Regular models of binary compound terms are:

- Izafet-constructions of II type. For example: нерв системасы – nervous system, атом энергиясе – nuclear power, җинаять эзләре – traces of the crime, керү төймәсе – access key, исәп язмасы – account etc;

- Izafet-constructions of III type. For example: туфракның ярлылануы – soil depletion, елганың туенуы

- the power of the river, шәхеснең кагылгысызлыгы – inviolability of the person etc;

- Adjective + noun. For example: берсоставлы җөмлә – mononuclear sentence, органик химия – organic chemistry, ялган һәвәслек – imaginary propensities, кыска ялганыш – short circuit, күләмле график

- the volume chart, абсолют сылтама – absolute reference etc.

- Noun + action noun. For example: фонемаларны ишетү – phonemic hearing, җаваплылыкка тарту – bringing to justice, кисәкчекләрнең бәрелешүе – collision of particles, көчләрне берләштерү – bringing the forces etc.

- Numeral + noun. For example: беренче инстанция – first instance etc.

- Pronoun + noun. For example: үзагач – wood etc.

- Adverb + noun. For example: үтә зарурлык – extreme necessity.

Multicomponent compound terms can have the following component composition:

1. 1. N+N2+N3: яшь чорлары үзенчәлекләре – age features;
2. 2. N+N2+V: нефть калдыкларын газлаштыру – gasification of oil residues;
3. 3. N + V + N2: авыртуны тою нокталары – pressure point;
4. 4. A+N+N2: гомуми тел белеме – general linguistics; социаль инстинктлар теорияе – theory of social instincts;
5. 5. A+N+V: шартлы рефлексның сүнүе – extinction of conditioned reflex;
6. 6. A+ A+ N: тере органик матдә – living organic matter;
7. 7. N +A+ N2: функциянең критик нокталары – critical points of the function;
8. 8. Adv + A+ N: кышын яшел үсемлекләр – winter green.

In the terminological system of the Tatar language there are also multicomponent units. For example: ми зур ярымшарларының алгы үзәк җыерчасы – precentral gyrus of the cerebral hemispheres.

The multiplicity of the Tatar language terminological vocabulary raises the question of their Genesis. It isadvisable to consider the following sources:

1) General Turkic layer of terminological vocabulary. The main vocabulary of the modern Tatar literary language refers to the common Turkic language for all Turkic languages, which is associated with the centuries-old history of Turkic tribes and peoples living on a huge territory. At this time forme such terms as сан (number), күкерт (sulfur), акча (money), сары (jaundice) etc. It is interesting to consider the root of the linguistic term басым – stress. It is obvious that it is cognate with the verb бас-, which is characterized as one of the main and most ancient Turkic words in etymological dictionaries (Akhmetyanov: 2015, p.163). Its grammatical and phonetic meaning is formed only in the twentieth century. The study of the etymology of another grammatical term – бәйлек (postposition) it also allows us to say that it has its roots back to the common Turkic word. Akhmetyanov also notes that the Turkic parallels of this grammatical term are the Kyrgyz term байламча, a term in the Komi language байлавуч, Kabardino-Balkar term байлав etc. (Akhmetyanov:2015, p.172). It is noteworthy that in the old Tatar language postpositions and similar words were called әдат (lit. – instrument).

2) Actually, the Tatar layer of terminology consists of terms formed on the basis of lexical and word- forming means of the Tatar language itself. For example, these are lexical units such as эшсезлек (unemployment), көндәшлек (competitiveness) etc.

3) Arab-Persian borrowings. The Muslim culture that penetrated into the Volga region and the basic Turkicculture in their synthesis formed a new type of culture, different from other local cultures that developed in similar conditions. Tatars through Islam joined the Arab-Persian artistic and musical culture, that is why quite a large number of terms in the field of arts have Arab-Persian roots. As examples it is possible to fix such words as дастан (genre), мәдхия (laudatory poem), мәрсия (хвалебное стихотворное произведение, посвященное уже умершем человеку). Of course, through the Arab-Persian languages, many scientific, economic and legal terms entered the Tatar language (висак – contract, дәгъва – claim), natural (җисем– body), humanitarian (хөкем – judgment, җөмлә – sentence, кабилият – abilities, фикерләү –thinking).

4) A significant part of the total flow of borrowed terms are terms that go back to the Russian and EuropeanImportar listalanguages. For example: cardiogram, monocentrism, reminiscence, reflex, algesimeter, linguistics, romanticism, sentimentalism, author, character etc. It should be noted that among the borrowings from European languages, a large group consists of borrowings from the English language. For example: demping, demarketing, dealing, engineering, consulting, leasing, listing, Liting, marketing, rating, copywriting, driver etc. A certain part of the borrowings are (bonus, denomination, calculation), Greek (monopoly, economy), French (allonge, backstage, Scam), Italian (Avista, accord, nostro-conto), German (guild, guest worker, freight) languages.

It should be noted that the language has a significant tendency to internationalize terms. This is manifested, for example, in the fact that in the presence of a native term, preference is given to its international synonym. So, instead of сизгеч more commonly used term sensor, instead of тишем – well etc.

DISCUSSION

The Tatar language`s terminological vocabulary is very numerous and becomes a prerequisite for the possibility of becoming a language not only as a spoken, but also as a scientific one. The work deals with terms related to different fields (different Sciences, technology, art). The study suggests that the terms have numerous ways of generation, they are actively formed and morphological and non-morphological ways. It is important to note that the Tatar terminology dates back to the common Turkic period, part of the terminological vocabulary is actually Tatar words. Attention is drawn to a large number of borrowed vocabulary, as noted In the work of G. Musina, K. Nasyri already provided the use of not only Tatar, but also borrowed terms such as barometer, thermometer, pressure gauge, perometer, photography, telescope (Musina: 2012, p.11) . The prevalence of borrowed terms should not be considered as a consequence of the limited possibilities of the Tatar language, it is rightly noted that " it is impossible to form all scientific, technical, economic, philosophical, cultural and other terms only on a national basis. This fact is not only due to globalization, it is a natural phenomenon. The bases of this type terms are identical in many languages, they can adapt to the phonetic system of the language to some extent, but structural and morphological elements contribute to the” nationalization " of the word» (Khairullin: 2006, p.45). Replenishment and development of the Tatar terminological vocabulary is based on the following principles:

1. 1. The principle of relying on the language's own resources;
2. 2. The principle of terms` translation (direct borrowing, calculus);
3. 3. The principle of association (synthesis of achievements of various scientific branches-Geology, mining, chemistry, physics, mathematics, etc).

CONCLUSION

The study of the Tatar terminological system, ensuring its active use in science and technology is one of the priorities of our time. Only in this case, the language can confirm its status as the state language, can grow and develop. It is noteworthy that marked a breakthrough in the study of the terminological layer of the Tatar vocabulary in recent decades: studied the sources, structure, functionality of the Tatar economic, military, medical, chemical, physical, mathematical, geographical and other terminology. This study was conducted without giving priority to any particular area of terminology; on the contrary, the purpose was predetermined by the study of the genesis and possibilities of term formation in the Tatar language in general. It was found that the terms of the Tatar language can be formally expressed in one word (азканлылык, персонаж) or phrase (нерв системасы, эмоциональ интеллект), frequency and multicomponent phrases (нерв бәйләнешләрен актуальләштерү). Terms can be formed in semantic (алтын, балчык), morphological (газла, утырым), syntactic (шартлы рефлекс), morphological and syntactic (аккүбәләк, агалтын, ЭЙК) ways. In the latter case, the abbreviation is usually represented by Russian terms: EMF – ЭЙК, that is electromotive force – электр йөртү көче.

Considering a way of addition, it is necessary to pay attention to the terms having structure of pairedwords (явым-төшем, алыш-биреш)– such units represent specificity of the Tatar terminology. Conversion as a way of term formation is also inherent in the Tatar language, in Russian it is not an active way of term formation.

Tatar terminology has ancient roots, goes back to the common Turkic language; it has a rich arsenal of Tatar words, and is actively replenished by borrowed vocabulary. In this case, there is a tendency inherent all languages.

Thus, this article argues that the Tatar language has a rich, accurate terminological vocabulary. Its semantics, and form, and functional (pragmatic) orientation meet the requirements for terminological vocabulary. We believe that under favorable extralinguistic (mainly social) factors Tatar terminological vocabulary can have a high degree of use. This study proves that it can and should be actively used for practical purposes.

BIODATA

F.I GABIDULLINA: Yelabuzhsky Institute of Kazan (Privolzhsky) Federal University,Tatarstan (RUSSIA) e- mail: farida-vip@mail.ru. Orcid: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3515-5830,Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Tatar Philology, Yelabuga Institute, Kazan Federal University, Research interests: philology of higher education; intercultural communication, literary criticism, theory of literature, folklore of the Tatar people. Author of 5 monographs, winner of the grant of the Republic of Tatarstan in 2020.

N. A. MUKIMOVA: Sterlitamak branch Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education«Bashkir State University» (RUSSIA), e-mail: nasima1974@yandex.ru. Candidate of Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Tatar and Chuvash Philology of the Siberian Branch of the Bashkir State University. Research interests: philology of higher education; Turkic studies and Finno-Ugric studies, cultural linguistics, dialects and folklore of the Tatar people, methods of teaching the native language and literature. Author of 1 monograph, 5 teaching aids, winner of a grant from the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Tatarstan in 2016.

A. M. ZAKIRZYANOV: G. Ibragimov Institute of Language, Literature and Art of the Tatarstan Academy of Sciences Tatarstan (RUSSIA). E-mail: Alfat_zak@mail.ru. Doctor of Philology, Head of the Literary Studies Department of the State Institution "Institute of Language, Literature and Art named after G. Ibragimov" of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Tatarstan, Associate Professor. Research interests: literary criticism, history of literature, theory of literature, literary criticism, drama. Author of over 300 publications, including 8 monographs, winner of the RT grant in 2019.

G. R. ABDULLINA: Bashkir State University, Bashkortostan (RUSSIA), e-mail: abguri@yandex.ru. Doctor of Philology, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Bashkir Philology, Oriental Studies and Journalism, Head of the Department of Oriental Studies and Bashkir Linguistics, Bashkir State University. Research interests: Turkic linguistics, comparative-historical linguistics, comparative-typological linguistics. Author of over 450 publications, including 10 monographs, winner of the grant of the Head of the Republic of Belarus in 2020.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

ABULHANOVA, Z. R., MINGAZOVA, L. I., KAYUMOVA, G. F., & IBRAYEVA, A. T. (2019). “Generalspirituality: The turkish lifestyle at the tatar literature of the late 19th-early 20th centuries”. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10(SpecialIssue), 671-678. doi:10.22055/rals.2019.15117

AKHMETYANOV RG (2015). “Etymological dictionary of the Tatar language”. In two volumes. Iv: A-L-Kazan: “education-time” publ, p.543.

AKHUNZYANOV EM (1968). “Russian borrowings in the Tatar language. - Kazan: Publ”. Kazan University, p.367.

AKIM, K, KARA-MURZA, G, SAENKO, N, SUHARYANTO, A & KALIMULLIN, D (2019). “Superhero movie:Breaking the challenges of topics in the modern epos”. [Película de superhéroes: Rompiendo los desafíos de los temas en los epos modernos] Opcion, 35(Special Issue 22), pp.1408-1428.

ANNÍA GONZÁLEZ, M., VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, J., RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R & RAMOS MARTÍNEZ, Y (2019).“Capacidades dinámicas frente a la incertidumbre: una mirada desde la gestión universitaria”. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia (RVG), 24(88), pp. 1357-1372.

GALIEVA LI, GALYAUTDINOV IG, KHUSNUTDINOV MZ (2006). “Mathematical Russian-Tatar dictionary. Bilingualism in the system of higher professional education: Tatar language: materials of the Republican scientific and practical conference”. Kazan: LLC "Center of operative printing”, pp.36 – 37.

GALIMYANOV AF & SULEYMANOV DS (2013). “System of Tatar terms in computer technologies and Informatics”. Computer processing of Turkic languages. First international conference: Proceedings. Astana: ENU named. LN. Gumilyova, pp.61-69.

GAPSALAMOV, AR, MERZON, EE, KUZNETSOV, MS, VASILEV, VL & BOCHKAREVA, TN (2020). “Theeducation system in the context of socio-economic transformations”. [O sistema educacional no contexto das transformações socioeconômicas] Periodico Tche Quimica, 17(34), pp.874-883.

GOROVAYA, MM, KHANMURZINA, RR, MALAKHOVA, LA, TAGIROVA, NP, SAENKO, NR, SHNYAKINA,EY & ZATSEPINA, MB (2017). “Didactic principles of university information educational systems designing”. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 12(7), pp.1201-1210. doi:10.12973/ejac.2017.00245a.

GRINEV-GRINEVICH SG (2008). “Terminology, M: Academy”, p.304.

HUMBATOVA, SI & HAJIYEV, NG (2019). “The role of spending on education and science in sustainable development”. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(2), pp.1704-1727. doi:10.9770/jesi.2019.7.2.

IVANOVA, V., POLTARYKHIN, A., SZROMNIK, A., & ANICHKINA, O. (2019). “Economic policy for country'sdigitalization: A case study”. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 649-661. doi:10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1(46)

K GOVINDASAMY, M., & MOI KWE, N. (2020). “Scaffolding Problem Solving in Teaching and Learning The DPACE Model - A Design Thinking Approach”. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(2), 93-112. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.02.6

KHAIRULLIN MB (2006). “Globalization and international growth terminology// Problems of improving the terminology of the Tatar language: materials of the scientific and practical conference Problems of improving the terminology of the Tatar language” (April 22, 2005). Kazan, pp.43 – 46.

LEHOUX, L., MOROZOVA, T.V., SAFONOVA, E.G., BALASHOVA, A.D. & PROTASOV, M.V. (2019).Practical aspects in calculating of impairment of financial assets according to IFRS 9 «Financial instruments». Proceedings of the 33rd International Business Information Management Association Conference, IBIMA 2019: Education Excellence and Innovation Management through Vision 2020, 6624-6632.

LYSYTSIA, N., MARTYNENKO, M., BIELIKOVA, N., GRON, O., & US, M. (2019). “Directions of socialpartnership of employers and universities in the sphere of economic education in Ukraine”. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1), 336-352.

MANNAPOVA LM (2008). “Regularities of formation of paired words”. Bulletin of the Chuvash University. 3(1), pp.188-191.

MUSINA GF (2012). “Terms of physics in the Tatar language: abstract dis”. Cand Philol. Sciences, Kazan, p.25.

NEWTON, J., WİLLİAMS, M., & FEENEY, D. (2020). “Implementing non-traditional assessment strategies in teacher preparation: Opportunities and challenges”. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 3(1), 39-51. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.03.01.3

NIKOLAEVA MM (2005). “Formation and development of terminology of criminal law in the Tatar language: abstract dis”. Cand, Philol. Sciences, Kazan, p.25.

NUREEVA, G. I., MINGAZOVA, L. I., IBRAYEVA, A. T., & FARIDOVNA, K. G. (2019). Literary drawing room:Children’s poetry translated by r. minnullin. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 10(4), 186-191. doi:10.31901/24566764.2019/10.04.310

RINCÓN, Y; SUKIER, H; CONTRERAS, J & RAMÍREZ MOLINA, R (2019). “Responsible CommunicationStrategies for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises”. Opción. Revista de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales, 35(89-2), pp. 1208-1234.

SAENKO, N, VORONKOVA, O, ZATSARINNAYA, E & MIKHAILOVA, M (2020). “Philosophical and cultural foundations of the concept of “nihitogenesis”.” Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(1), pp.88- 103.

SAENKO, N., VORONKOVA, O., VOLK, M., & VOROSHILOVA, O. (2019). “The social responsibility of a scientist: Philosophical aspect of contemporary discussions”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 332-345.

SAGDIEVA, R., HUSNUTDINOV, D., MIRZAGITOV, R., & GALIULLIN, R. (2019). “Kinship terms as proof ofgenetic relationship”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(3), 103-117.

SAIFULLOVA, R., KRAPOTKINA, I., POSPELOVA, N., & KAYUMOVA, G. (2018). “The social status ofteachers and education in the russian empire of the second half of the XIX century”. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 9(3), 97-108. doi:10.17499/jsser.68433

SHAMSEEVA GH (2009). “History of development of legal terminology in the Tatar language”. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk state University. 13(5), pp.147-151.

SHAMSUTDINOVA RR (2000). “Medical terminology in the Tatar language: dis. Cand”. Philol, sciences. Kazan, p.219.

TARMAN, B. (2016). “Innovation and Education”. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 1(1). Retrieved from http://ressat.org/index.php/ressat/article/view/3

TEZINA EM (2006). “Multicomponent terminological phrases as elements of the Internet text”. Bulletin of the South Ural state University, 17(72), pp.208-210.

TSVETKOVA, M, ARUTYUNYAN, M, SAENKO, N, SHRAMKO, L & KALIMULLIN, D (2019). “Incorporation ofphilosophical ideas in science fiction literature”. [Incorporación de ideas filosóficas en la literatura de ciencia ficción] Opcion, 35(Special Issue 23), pp.598-612.

VILLALOBOS ANTÚNEZ, JOSÉ VICENTE & GANGA CONTRERAS, FRANCISCO (2018). “Tecnoempresay Tecnocimiento: Una Perspectiva desde la Bioética Empresarial”. Revista Fronteiras: Journal of Social, Technological and Environmental Science. Vol. 7, No. 3: 214-230. Unievangélica Centro Universitario, (Brasil).

VOLCHIK, V & MASLYUKOVA, E (2019). “Trust and development in education and science”. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(3), pp.1444-1455. doi:10.9770/jesi. 2019.6.3(27).

WİLDES, A. (2020). “The Unethical Practice of Omitting Language in State Science Standards: Denying Students True Democratic Freedom”. Journal Of Curriculum Studies Research, 2(1), 112-128. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.02.01.7

IR