Interaction between low level laser therapy and anesthesia in wistar rats

Interações entre laser de baixa potência e anestesia em ratos wistar

Low level laser therapy (LLLT) has been widely used in clinical practice because it is not invasive, painless, easily administered (Bjordal et al., 2008), and has beneficial effects for the irradiated tissues, such as activation of microcirculation (Maegawa, Itoh, Hosokawa, Yaegashi, & Nishi, 2000), vasodilation production (Plass, Wieselthaler, Podesser, & Prusa, 2012) and neovascularization (Cury et al., 2013). LLLT modulates several biological processes, increasing mitochondrial respiration and ATP synthesis (Karu, 1999), changing enzymatic reactions by inhibiting the synthesis and release of prostaglandins (Marcos et al., 2011), besides producing analgesia via release of beta-endorphin (Meireles et al., 2012) and changes in nerve conduction (Chow, David, & Armati, 2007; Yan, Chow, & Armati, 2011).

In surgical procedures, an important component is the anesthesia. For experiments with small animals, it is commonly used a mixture of ketamine and xylazine as anesthetics. Ketamine has sympathomimetic action on the sympathetic nervous system (Brookes, Brown, & Reilly, 2002), increasing the cardiac output, blood pressure and pulse rate (Han, Kim, Joo, & Kim, 2012), in addition to vasoconstriction (Brookes, Brown, & Reilly, 2000). One the other hand, xylazine acts through the α2-adrenoceptor and mediates the vasoconstriction of smooth muscle and vessels, increasing peripheral vascular resistance and arterial and venous pressure in response to catecholamines (Haniuda, Itoh, & Chiba, 1989).

If anesthetics are injected into an area with large vascular activity, the anesthesic substance is rapidly absorbed, which produces a shorter duration of anesthesia time. Increased local circulation, such as vasodilation produced by LLLT, in both local and systemic way, can increase the uptake of anesthetic agents, reducing the action and duration of anesthesia and stimulating precocious pain in the post-operative period (Aras, Omezli, & Gungormus, 2010). The aim of this study was to assess whether the LLLT, 660 nm, can lower the effect of injectable anesthetics (ketamine associated with xylazine) in Wistar rats, considering that these animals and anesthetics are routinely used in experiments aimed at scientific maturity with a view to future applications in humans.

LLLT is a useful tool for the therapeutic field, aiming tissue repair (Bossini et al., 2012; Cury et al., 2013; Hussein, Alfars, Falih, & Hassan, 2011; Vasilenko et al., 2010), anti-inflammatory effects (Chen, Huang, Sharma, & Hamblin, 2011; Marcos et al., 2011) and analgesia (Chow et al., 2007; Chow, Johnson, Lopes-Martins, & Bjordal, 2009; Chow, Armati, Laakso, Bjordal, & Baxter, 2011; Eslamian, Shakouri, Ghojazadeh, Nobari, & Eftekharsadat, 2012; Rayegani et al., 2011; Yan et al., 2011). However, Aras et al. (2010), in a review study, indicate a possible dubious effect of low power laser associated with anesthetics, since it can help or hinder the effects of anesthesia. Ignatov et al. (2005) observed, after irradiating with HeNe laser on snails neurons associated bupivacaine, potassium channel changes, increasing the effect of blocking or decreasing the anesthetic action, according to the use of high or low doses of irradiation.

On the laser capacity to extend or shorten the duration of the anesthetic effect, both by analgesic effects and by increasing local blood supply, respectively, Aras et al. (2010) report that the LLLT has been used to prevent postoperative pain, although some studies indicate positive effects and others report no effect. In this way, these authors emphasize the need for further clinical and experimental research to investigate the effects of LLLT on the duration of anesthesia. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate the effects of laser 660 nm, with a total dose of 20 Jcm-2 on anesthesia with ketamine and xylazine in rats subjected to anesthesia alone or combined with the exposure of the sciatic nerve to minimize the use of common anesthetics in painful postoperative recovery due to surgical procedures.

The effect of LLLT on microcirculation has been documented by several studies, including Plass et al. (2012), who observed that the 680 nm laser caused vasodilation in coronary and fragments of human internal thoracic arteries. Concurrently, Shuvaeva, Gorshkova, Kostylev, & Dvoretsky (2011) irradiated normotensive or hypertensive rats with 473 and 650 nm and observed that, especially for the red wavelength, the laser weakened arterial tone, thereby increasing the constrictor effect of norepinephrine. Pereira, Pinho, Medrado, Andrade, & Reis (2010) irradiated mice with 670 nm, after performing skin lesions, and verified an increased expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), increased acute inflammation and vasodilation. Such effect of laser therapy is based on the premise of Aras et al. (2010), which may have been observed with regard to the time of awakening of the animal, whereas for the irradiated group the time was significantly lower than that to the control group.

The grip strength assessment was used by Bertelli and Mira (1995) to analyze the recovery of median nerve injury. In this study, it has been adapted for the analysis of anesthesia recovery. This assessment is simple and reproducible and may indicate differences in the muscular function and in post-anesthesia recovery. As expected there was a significant decrease in muscle grip strength in the post-anesthetic period, but there were no differences between groups, indicating that, about 10 minutes after recovery from anesthesia, the LLLT did not influence the post-anesthesia care for muscle strength.

Nociceptive assessment was performed by the paw withdrawal threshold for pressure with the electronic von Frey filament, which has been shown to be a sensitive, objective and useful method to quantitatively evaluate nociception and the analgesic effect of therapies (Vivancos et al., 2004). This evaluation evidenced the analgesic effect of LLLT, since the withdrawal threshold was higher for this group, regardless of whether the stimulus was plantar or local, in comparison with the control group.

The results of this study supported the use of laser immediately during intraoperative acts. This fact was similar to that reported by Markovic and Todorovic (2006), who irradiated humans anesthetized with lidocaine associated with epinephrine, locally, after 10 minutes of removal of third molar and noted that the pain was less severe in the group receiving 637 nm LLLT with 4 J cm-2 than in groups receiving diclofenac or control group.

As limitations of the present study, stand out the lack of assessments of nerve conduction or inflammatory markers (for the second stage), which is suggested to be performed in future studies.

In summary, LLLT caused no significant reduction on the effect of anesthesia, because, although it has produced early awakening, it did not affect muscle strength, and promoted a better analgesic effect than the non-irradiated condition.

To the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação Araucária, for research fellowships.