1. INTRODUCTION

Creativity assumes new vision, the new decision, new approach. It is readiness for refusal of habitual schemes and stereotypes of behavior, perception and thinking, readiness for self-change. Creativity – is introduction into the world something new, realization of the certain originality, uniqueness, and it is the creative act.

In the modern philosophical dictionary creativity is considered as "the person activity, creating new objects and qualities, schemes of behavior and communication, new images and knowledge" (Babansky, 1987: 13).

On our deep belief, the creative person is characterized by such lines as readiness for risk, independence of judgments, impulsiveness, informative meticulousness, criticality of judgments, originality, the courage of imagination and the thought, sense of humor and tendency to the joke, etc. These qualities reveal the features of really free, independent and active personality. The modern concept creative person is understood as such type of the personality for whom it is characteristic steady, high level orientation on creativity, motivational and creative activity.

We believe that creativity is based on persistence, patience and hard work. Therefore for the purity of reasoning, it is necessary to focus on improvisation at the first flash of inspiration.

The elements of creativity and reproduction in the activity of pupils, as well as in activity of the mature person, should be distinguished on two characteristic signs:

1. 1. 1) By the result (product) of activity:

   2) On a way of its passing (process). It is obvious that in educational activity the elements of creativity at pupils, first of all, are shown in features of its passing, namely: in ability to see the problem, to find new ways of the solution of concrete- practical and learning tasks in unusual situations.

During the studying process of theoretical material the teacher should select among the set of didactic and additional materials such tasks, which would contribute to the development of the creative beginnings at schoolchildren. As a rule, teachers generalize theoretical material in other aspects, such as presentation, messages from other auxiliary sources. At the same time the informative and creative potential of pupils is increased.

The teacher of comprehensive school owing to features of professional activity in a varying degree combines scientific and pedagogical creativity. Certainly, the nature of scientific activity, the logic and algorithm of the solution of scientific tasks determine the algorithm on solution of pedagogical tasks. It is not casual, because, firstly, pedagogical creativity is more regulated in time, secondly, the delay of results of creative search at the teacher is available, thirdly, there is taken place the coauthorship of the teacher with pupils, colleagues teachers in pedagogical process, based on the unity of the purpose of professional activity.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1 Research methods

The following methods were used in the course of the research: theoretical (analysis; synthesis; specification; generalization; method of analogies; modeling); diagnostic (questioning; interviewing; testing; method of tasks); empirical (studying of experience of higher education institutions, normative and educational-methodical documentation; pedagogical observation); experimental (the stating, forming, control experiments); methods of mathematical statistics and graphic representation of the results.

2.2. Experimental research base

The experimental research base is Syrdariya University, Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University.

2.3. The research stages

The research of the problem was carried out in three stages: at the first stage it was carried out the theoretical analysis of the existing methodological approaches in philosophical, psychological and pedagogical scientific literature, dissertation works on the problem, and also the theory and methodology of pedagogical researches; the problem, purpose and methods of the research are marked out, the plan of the pilot study is made; at the second stage the model of formation of readiness at future teachers to creative activity at school was developed; the methods of formation of readiness at future teachers to creative activity were developed; the experimental work was carried out; at the third stage the experimental work was completed, theoretical and practical conclusions are specified, the received results are generalized and systematized.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Structure and content of the model

In our opinion, the concept of modelling is a reproduction of the essential parties and the relations in didactic process. The basic purpose of modelling consists in actualization at the student consciousness the processes which psychologically correspond to the actions of the person. It is important that the situation had informative character for students, it must not be artificial, far-fetched, abstract, it has to give the chance of use of life experience.

We took the following gradation of levels as the basis for determination of the level of readiness at future teachers to creative activity: intuitive, reproductive, reproductive-creative and creative.

At studying the real state of readiness at students to creative activity at school, we will determine the percentage of the signs of the studied readiness in each of the marked out levels: creative level - 20 signs - 100%; reproductive-creative - 15 signs -75%; reproductive – 9 signs - 45%; intuitive - 3 signs - 15%.

Being guided by the above criteria, the indicators, levels of the formation of the studied readiness at future teachers, we studied experience of some higher education institutions of the Republic of Kazakhstan. This model of readiness was the basis for diagnostics of the stating and control experiments at carrying out of experimental work on the studied problem.

It is important to begin the first stage of development of creativity at future teachers with studying of the discipline Pedagogy for creation of the strong base of theoretical knowledge. It is especially necessary to pay attention to the creative side of this question.

So, how do we hope to facilitate the informative creative task of the student?

The main thing is to provide dialogue between the learning subject (student) and the cognizable object - the personality as real (including - dialogue of the student with itself as self-knowledge) or imagined, figuratively represented. It can be reached by means of practical problem tasks.

The second is a stimulation of cogitative, search activity of the cognizant student that is provided with tasks on the analysis of theoretical views of different authors, comparative studying of different types of activity, actions, behavior, acts, the choice of the correct or preferable point of view from the row of given, and also tasks for theoretical or logical justification of the made choice. Proceeding from it, it is possible to speak about creativity formation, so it is necessary to use the maximum of questions and tasks on reflection over the problems of pedagogy, cooperation and the minimum of hints of ready answers, that is the maximum of independence and creativity, and the minimum of formal following to the ready answer. The cogitative activity of the student at independent studying of the subject is strictly directed on the line of creativity: it is set the problem – the educational task or study question, it is recommended the literature, and it is stimulated the independent search of the answer.

Thus, the task-solution, search and finding of the answers to problematic issues, the subsequent educational purposes turn everyday life and activity of the student into the peculiar creative ground on application of the theory of pedagogy to vital realities.For providing creative conditions of cognitive activity, it is necessary to use the creativity development methods, known from psychology - the brainstorming method for generation of the ideas, idea selection; the synectics, the way of the organization of collective cogitative activity on the basis of four methods: consideration of the problem in that kind as it was given; refusal of the obvious decision; carrying out direct analogy to something; formulation of the problem in a general view. It is expedient to practice nonconventional methods and forms of education: modeling, role-playing games, micro teaching. The individual and personal activity of the student contributes to the development of the independent thinking, and search of the solution of various pedagogical tasks. Creative notebooks are the continuous process of the identification, analysis, communication and correction of the teacher work with future teachers. It is the highest form of innovative training technologies and education of schoolchildren at the present stage. Teachers of the pedagogical university have the real task to conduct the directed activity for the formation of the creative person of the student who is professionally adapted for real school life, and also the creations of individual models of the identity of future teacher. A duty of the teacher of higher education institution – is to teach students to diagnose the identity of the pupil, i.e. to pass from the empirical educational system to scientifically based.

We took the following gradation of levels as the basis for determination of readiness of the teacher on formation of creativity in students: high, sufficient, low. As criteria for determination of level of readiness at the teacher on formation of creativity in the students we took the constructive, organizational, communicative stimulating, information-training psychological-pedagogical methods and conditions of the training process.

We referred 4 criteria and 19 indicators (table 1) to the main criteria and indicators, opening the tendency of the studied readiness. At studying of the real state of readiness at the teacher on formation of creativity at students, we will determine the percentage of the signs of the studied readiness in each of the marked out levels: high level - 19 signs - 100%; sufficient level - 13 signs of-68,4%; low level - 2 signs - 10,5%.

3.2. Stages of model introduction

The experimental work with future teachers was carried out in three steps, covering the stating, forming and control experiments. The students of 2-4 courses of Syrdariya University and Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University participated in the experiment; there are captured 300 future teachers. During the experiment, it was analysed the pedagogical activity of students of the second, third and fourth year. We recognized that the creative relation of the teacher to his professional activity is connected with the necessity of conducting in the training process in higher education institution of the system-forming creativity - creative notebooks.

3.2.1 The stating stage

The anonymous questioning and specifying conversations with the second-year students allowed to establish that 27% recognized the choice as wrong. 82% of the second-year students are not going to connect after the graduation of the university their professional activity with the teacher's profession. 12%of students chose the pedagogical specialty accidentally. Most of the second-year students have the superficial idea about the teacher's profession. Questionnaire shown that students could not answer the questions: What is the creativity? How do you understand the term pedagogical creativity? By what criteria do you determine the creative person? The ambiguity of answers and their vagueness gives, as the result, the absence at schools of outstanding and extraordinary personalities. It was obvious to see in answers of some second-year students that they did not have in memory the memorable teacher-persons who would develop at them creative inclinations.

Analyzing various levels of readiness at student-graduates to creative, research solution of various pedagogical tasks, we have come to the conclusion that at a pedagogical higher education institution, there is no training system of students for creative activity, it has especially poorly developed the methods of the student organization to pedagogical creativity. The basis of pedagogical creative at future teachers is their training to the scientific-theoretical aspects of the development of pedagogy. From this moment we formed the foundation for the reproductive activity of future teachers for their further producing.

For the purpose of determination which concepts are difficult acquired by the second-year students, we have created the model of elimination of gaps in knowledge. So, we carried out the test of students for identification of creative potentials. Only 1,3% of students gained 48 and more points, and only they had the considerable creative potential which gives them the wide choice of creative opportunities. 98,7% of students did not gain 48 points - they have creativity barriers. For determination of levels of the teacher activity on formation of creativity at the students we analysed the studies (lectures, seminar and practical studies) at more than 30 teachers of Syrdariya University and Akhmet Yassawi International Kazakh-Turkish University. During research, we found out and determined in % ratio of these levels, so, we took as the basis criteria from the systemic-functional model of the teacher activity on the formation of creativity at students.

The analysis of the obtained data allows to draw the conclusion that training of future teachers to creative activity in a pedagogical higher education institution is carried out at the average level and develops in students the constructive, organizational, communicative- stimulating, information-training abilities, i.e. those abilities which have the importance for the organization of joint creative activity of students in the process of their vocational training.

It is necessary to accustom future teachers gradually and systematically to permission of pedagogical situations which quite often arise in teaching and educational process. As an example, the imitating pedagogical situation was given for the second-year students in the following content: "How would you solve the problem situation in case: if during the break two schoolchildren did not divid the place of the school desk, and after there was a quarrel between children, and each of them didnot want to concede?" (Babansky, 1987:10). The conducted written survey shown that from 47 students -67% would prefer to resolve this situation by the administrative-command method of influencing the schoolchildren, 21% - admonitions, only 9% - non- standard, perceptual ways, 3% could not answer on the asked question. Therefore, in higher education institution, putting future teachers in problem situations through creative activity, it is possible to develop gradually at them the logic of the search for the solution of pedagogical tasks by the non-standard ways and to train them for future profession qualitatively.

3.2.2 The forming stage

It is known that studying of science in connection with vital practice - is simultaneously and studying of school life from the scientific position, that is scientific research of practical problems. It is expedient to show to future teachers the system-forming function of pedagogical science.

More concrete methodical recommendations usually contain in tasks on each subject of the projects, given to the students on consultations. During preparation for performance of the tasks, it is necessary to study very attentively the requirements to quality of work that will allow for the student to be guided by them at independent studying of literature. The analytical character of the reasoning, independence, logicality and rationality of conclusions and generalizations by each student of creative works of the fellow students are reflected in creative notebooks, where they receive a grade for work from the teacher in the form of gratitudes, and the shortcomings are specified tactfully.

The last stage - is assessment in creative notebooks of positive and negative sides of the project. The teacher generalizes and checks creative works of the opponents and makes grades to them. Each lesson gives absolute coverage and assessment of student’s activity that is allowed for teacher to draw objective conclusions at the end of the semester, these grades are corrected at the examination.

Research in the form of writing of the project or yearly essay promotes to the training of students, first of all, to independent professional creative activity, to the identification of the most talented future teachers and their inclusion in the pedagogical experimental creative laboratory.

The teacher, at the solution of pedagogical tasks, put the problem before future teachers and he solves it with them, showing before them the standard of search, creative activity. After that, it is necessary to give them the possibility to solve the problem task independently. The designing of the pedagogical situation requires the systematic approach. It is necessary to create not separate situations, but complexes of situations. The only use of the systems of situations is capable to improve and enrich pedagogical process, and future teachers have to approach creatively to the solution of the situations, arising in school practice.

The task, which has to be put before students’ analysts and opponents, comes down to the comprehensive and intelligent estimation of activity of the student-traineer, identification of his strong and weaknesses sides. The theoretical knowledge, acquired by the student in higher education institutions, not only is fixed and become deeper in the process of practice, but the skills and abilities of pedagogical work are developed as well. Any (without any exceptions) academic subject in the pedagogical higher education institution has to be, to some extent, turned to student teaching. The practice has to be entered in objectively existing stages of the formation of future teacher in order to take proper place in the training system of students for work at school. Today, unfortunately, it is possible to allocate only two such stages.

Joining in practice at each training stage, the student deals with pedagogical systems (the system of the teacher work, class teacher, etc.). Development has to be carried out at three levels: personal - conviction in the need of a system of work; scientific and pedagogical - mastering its scientific bases; practical - mastering abilities of its organization. The specific place on forming creativity at future teachers has to be the mastering by them basics of pedagogical skill of the teacher. The special course Creative activity of the teacher at modern school was conducted with students of senior years. Our special course was calculated on 45 hours, from them: lectures – 15 hours, seminars - 15 hours, the practical training - 15 hours. Lectures contain the scientific-theoretical material on the tendencies of development of the modern school (including gymnasiums, lyceums, colleges), on the pedagogical process, about pedagogical creativity. Seminars are devoted to the development of theoretical questions on problems of creative activity at the school teacher. A practical training of students is devoted to development of approximate lessons, extra- curricular activities, development of innovative training technologies and education of schoolchildren.

In the methodical plan the basis of conducting seminars was individual and microgroup activity of students in the form of reports, messages, public defence of projects, the analysis of lessons with the use of creative notebooks of students. The leading form of conducting the practical training were the student's microgroups, opponents and reviewers who were engaged in developments of new, non-standard lessons and extra-curricular activities; preparation of lists of references, presentation, the complete sets of didactic and distributing material. The practical tasks, performed by students, were fixed in creative notebooks, where their knowledge, skills and abilities were evaluated and commented on. The brightest, extraordinary and talented students participated voluntarily and with enthusiasm in the pedagogical experimental creative laboratory on the basis of secondary schools No. 7 of Zhetysay and No. 1 of Turkestan. We tested various methods, techniques and tutorials, which allowed to improve qualitatively the teaching and educational process of the school. The non-standard lessons of different types were put in the student’s practice: the lesson - discussion, the lesson-a round table, the integrated lessons, lessons - courts, lessons – CCR (Club of cheerful and resourceful), lessons as Field of dreams, What? Where? When?, etc. During the experiment, it became clear that 62% of students had not enough time, sometimes at carrying out the game moments at the lesson they were on a string at pupils, i.e. liberalized with them. 48% of students had no consecutive system of individual studying of age and psychological features of the pupil. 87% of students saw in the pupils equal participants of the pedagogical process.

The third research phase was built originally on the basis of preparation of students for conducting the lesson. Due to the changes of valuable orientations in our society, we paid much attention to the educational moments of the lesson and extra-curricular activities. We are sure (our researches demonstrate it)that it is not necessary to wait for the beginning of pedagogical practice by the curriculum of pedagogical higher education institution, and on the contrary, it is necessary to attract actively students from the second year as the microgroups in practical life of the school. In order to the forthcoming pedagogical practice of students conducts more successfully, it is necessary to give them samples of the approximate analysis of lesson in advance and to acquaint them with requirements on pedagogical practice. The task, which is set for microgroups of the second-year students, comes down to comprehensive and intelligent estimation of pedagogical activity of the student-probationer, identification his strong and weaknesses sides, and also to acquisition of initial pedagogical experience. The final stage of training of future teachers to creative activity is used in the research purposes of the effective scheme of the intermediary actions on the settlement of conflict situations arising in school. The fourth-year students were included after passing by them pedagogical practice. It should be noted that 92% of students used this algorithm correctly and precisely. Students did not become isolated on the permission of the conflict situations arising at school, but successfully applied this technique to solution of conflicts, arising between parents, adults and children on the street. They saved family bonds in two cases.

3.2.3 Control stage

Check of formation on levels of readiness at students to creative activity was carried out taking into account earlier described indicators, criteria and methods. Dynamics of the growth of the studied readiness can be tracked visually (table 2).

1. 1. 1. Intuitive level of readiness for creativity. 22% of the graduated students had it. Mastering the following pedagogical abilities is characteristic of them: to monitor the speech, to state the thoughts coherently, to listen to the interlocutor, etc. At the same time, they often do not see pedagogical sense of the situation, generally act intuitively, are not able to explain their actions.

   2. Reproductive. 51% of the graduated students correspond to this level. They repeat the known definitions, rules, need the hint, and their actions do not go beyond these limits.

   3. Reproductive and creative level of readiness for creative activity is had at 21,4% of the graduated students. Features of this group are concluded that they form the system of scientific and pedagogical knowledge, skills. They generally successfully cope with the teaching, according to the developed approximate schemes of the lesson. However, they are not able to make the right decisions in time at emergence of pedagogical situations at the lesson. Abilities to the diagnosing of the educational process are insufficiently developed at them.

   4. Creative level is observed at 5,6% of the graduated students. Generally it is students who have the sufficient level of knowledge of the subject, there are natural teacher's data, scientific and practical approach to pupils, and aspiration to cooperation with schoolchildren. Analyzing table 2 indicators, we consider that reproductive (51%) and reproductive and creative (21,4%) levels of readiness at students to creative activity should carry to suffice, as in total 72,4% of the examined graduates possess them. Intuitive level of readiness (22%) can be considered insufficient, and creative (5,6%) - is considered as ideal. Therefore, it is necessary to focus the organization and content of teaching and educational work in a teacher training university.

It is visible from the table that for the formation of readiness at students to creative activity, it is necessary to conduct systematic, purposeful and productive work in the complex with special departments. Creative notebooks are especially important; visit by micro-groups by second-year students of lessons at student- probationers; introduction into their practice of innovative training technologies and education of schoolchildren, which give the gain in dynamics of the readiness, studied by us.

This table shows that in the process of the experimental work with future teachers there is an increase of such qualities, significant for the formation, as reproductive and creative (from 8,2% to 21,4%) and creative (from 1,4% to 5,6%) nature of the activity. Also it is visible from the table that the reproductive nature of activity at future teachers decreases considerably: from 72% (on the second year) up to 51% (on the final year).

Proceeding from the above, it is possible to draw the conclusion that the offered method on formation of readiness at future teachers to creative activity is effective (Ibrahim Ova et al., 2017).

4. DISCUSSION

Studying of psychological and pedagogical literature allows to state insufficient readiness of this problem, the absence of scientific- reasonable training system in a pedagogical higher education institution on the formation of readiness at future teachers to creative activity at school. The problem of creativity in the psychological science was studied by many scientists. Mooney (1963), Torrance (1988), Cratchfield (1962), Starkwezer (1976), Patric (1955), Barron (1988) and others. They defined ability to creativity differently. They have something in common with all the differences in these definitions: the ability to creativity is defined as the ability to create something new, original.

It is distinguished from the objective and subjective creativity in literature. Objective creativity - is the creation of any qualitatively new, socially significant product (pictures, works, cars, the device, etc.). And subjective creativity - is the result and process of mastering ways of actions by new for given subject (new for him, but objectively already known and not new) methods of solution of the tasks.

Professional creativity has bright subjective character; his products are expression of feature of the inner world of the creator. Professional creativity is caused by social and sociocultural conditions. On the one hand, sociocultural values of the society and microenvironment determine the valuable orientations of the creator, with another - products of activity influence mass consciousness and develop the existing orientations. Nikandrov(1987), Babansky(1987), Zagvyazinsky (1987), Lvova(1985), Shadrikov (1987) etc., considered problems of pedagogical creativity. Their works, generally, opened the problems of the creative relationship between participants of pedagogical process, and they did not pay much attention to formation of creativity at future teachers in the process of vocational training. Belozertsev’s (2009) work is the closest to our research theme, which is considered the problems of teachers in the conditions of reorganization of national education, there are analyzed contradictions in the system of pedagogical education and its shortcomings. Fridman (1997) pays serious attention to the creative activity. According to him, it is very important to emphasize that amateur, free, creative activity in any sphere of society life, at any position, meet deep needs of the person. It is necessary to transform generally human nature, its character, in order to the personality became creative.

A group of the researchers Bezrukova (1996), Kuzmina (1990), Slastenin (1997), Shcherbakov (1987) mark out the need of such qualities: ability to transfer knowledge to others, to understand the point of view of the pupil, his interests and requirements, to project the development of his personality, pedagogical tactfulness, pedagogical observation, distributed attention. Begalieva (2010) considers that it is necessary to form creative activity at future teachers by means of modern pedagogical technologies. Mussabekova (2015) emphasizes that result of creativity is an introduction to the pedagogical process of innovations.

Today the higher education institution is faced with the problem of reorientation of future teachers to new technologies of training and education. In our opinion, it is necessary to put in higher education institution the cardinal direction of education towards to the humanization, differentiation and individualization of pedagogical process, rise in intelligence, and the creative beginnings. Exactly through the identity of the student it is possible to see the identity of the pupil, because creativity assumes education and training of the personality by social values (Alikberova et al., 2017).

We are convinced that the ability to solve creative problems has to be put in the teacher training. The important factor is a creation of the atmosphere of productive and creative activity for the teacher on training of future teachers in creative activity in higher education institution. It assumes liquidation of the essential shortcomings of vocational training at graduates of pedagogical higher education institutions, namely: the formalism in knowledge, inability to apply knowledge in the concrete pedagogical situation, lack of studying skills at schoolchildren and establishing contacts with them, the management of children's collective, the correct relationship with colleagues, etc.

It should be noted that pedagogical practice is reliable bridge between the theoretical and practical training of students in higher education institution and their further professional activity. There should be noted: how future teacher will be able to acquire the elements and features of teaching activity, and how he will be able to show the creative abilities. It is known that the ability to pedagogical activity at students is shown not at once. It is a laborious and hard work both for the teacher of higher education institution, and for the student. The belief in possibilities of future teacher should not turn into an ostentatious statement of material, and on the contrary, every time, each lesson has to bring to itself the new ideas, non-standard and interesting forms of the organization of educational process. The logic and big optimism – are basic elements for disclosure of the creative potential of students. The student as the tomorrow's teacher in higher education institution has to be ready to creative work in future professional activity. It is possible to draw the conclusion on the basis of the theoretical analysis that pedagogical creativity - is the original, non-standard decision by the teacher in the teaching and educational tasks, enrichment by him the new methods, means and methods of training and education of schoolchildren.

5. CONCLUSION

It is established that the formation of readiness at future teachers to creative activity will conduct successfully if the teaching and educational process of higher education institution has the stage-by- stage training, which reflects mastering the pedagogical theory, methods and techniques of the original solution of professional and pedagogical tasks. Only such conditions can be the basis for the creation of the organization of educational process by new methods and means, introductions of non-standard approaches to productive activity of pupils. Studying, analyzing problems on the formation of readiness at future teachers to creative activity at school, we have revealed the leading idea: the idea of the prevalence of theoretical knowledge; idea of cooperation with pupils in training; idea of the advancing training; idea of the doctrine without coercion; idea of reliance on the positive qualities of pupils in training and education; idea of the difficult purpose; idea of systematicness of training; idea of problem training; idea of cooperation and respect of the identity of the child. Teachers achieve the greatest results in training and education of pupils, who together with creative search of more effective means, forms, methods and techniques of training, introduction of achievements of pedagogical science and the best practices, organize joint creative activity with pupils.

6. RECOMMENDATIONS

1. 1. 1. The formation of readiness at future teachers to creative activity in school is expedient to build taking into account orientations of teaching and educational process of pedagogical higher education institution to object of the teacher activity and mastering by the students’ necessary ways of pedagogical creativity.

   2. Formation of readiness in students of pedagogical higher education institution to pedagogical creativity must have stage- by-stage character: mastering scientific-theoretical base, mastering skills of the organization of creative work with the pupils on the basis of inclusion of creative notebooks in their educational process, mastering of the technique of conflict resolution in school, mastering of psychological and pedagogical diagnostics, mastering the ways of acting in unusual situations. It is necessary to create for them the resolved pedagogical situations, quite often arising in the educational process of the teacher.

   3. The content, organizational forms, methods, means and methods of teaching and educational work in pedagogical higher education institutions have to be differed in direction on development at students of creative qualities.

   4. It is necessary to provide for the system of creative tasks in courses of pedagogy, psychology and private techniques.

   5. For the purpose of improvement of formation of pedagogical creativity in students it is necessary to include more safely in educational process the defense of papers, projects before opponents, the techniques of analysis and expert analysis, to attract the most active students in the pedagogical experimental creative laboratory.

   6. It is necessary to involve the second-year students as micro- groups in practical school life, in order to train more consistently and successfully future teachers for pedagogical practice. At the same time, they have to be examined by the fellow students on the practical lessons after visiting the lesson and extra-curricular activities. Everything has to be fixed in creative notebooks for deeper and comprehensive examination.

   7. It is necessary to enter into student practice the innovative normative methods of analysis of the teacher activity which is a necessary component for the successful creative activity of the future teachers.

   8. There should be changed all systems of seminars, laboratory- practical classes and practical works. Their main purpose should be the creative attitude to the scientific-practical activities. For this purpose, it is expedient to students to conduct the first independent activities in proportion with their individual characteristics, experience, dispositions, in order to use as much as possible their opportunities for entry into creative pedagogical activity.

Given research does not pretend to cover all aspects of the development on pedagogical creativity, readiness of future teacher to creative activity in school in the process of their vocational training in pedagogical higher education institution. It is necessary to study more deeply the possibilities of each cycle, studied at a pedagogical higher education institution, disciplines on formation of pedagogical creativity. The problem on formation of readiness at future teachers to creative activity by means of modern pedagogical technologies demands the special research.

REFERENCES

ALIKBEROVA, A., KHABIBULLINA, E., VALIEVA, J. 2017. Perspective trends of computer assisted learning language application for Chinese language teaching. Astra Salvensis. No 1. Pp. 285- 295. Almaty.

BABANSKY, Y. 1987. The development of the initiative and creativity of teachers the imperative of times. Vospitanieshkolnikov. No 2. Pp.2-7. Almaty.

BARRON, F. 1988. Putting Creativity to Work The Nature of Creativity Sternberg. Cambridge. Cambridge Univ. Press. pp. 76- 98. Almaty.

BEGALIEVA, S. 2010. Scientific foundations for the formation of creative activity of future teachers by means of modern pedagogical technologies. P. 320. Almaty.

BELOZERTSEV, E. 2009. Preparation of teachers in conditions of restructuring. Pedagogy. P. 208.

BEZRUKOVA, B. 1996. Pedagogy. Projective pedagogy.Ekaterinburg.Delovayakniga. P. 344. Almaty.

CRATCHFIELD, R. 1962. Conformity and creative thinking. Contemporary approaches to creative thinking. Atherton Press. pp. 120-140. Almaty.

FRIDMAN, L. 1997. Psycho-pedagogy of general education. Institute of Practical Psychology. p. 288. Moscow.

IBRAHIMOVA, B., TARASOVA, F., PESTOVA, M., BEISENBAI, A. 2017. Comparative linguistic-cultural analysis of the verbs related to food intake process. Moscow.

KUZMINA, N. 1990. Formation of pedagogical abilities. Leningrad State University. p. 98.Moscow.

LVOV, Y. 1985. The creative laboratory of teachers. Prosveschenie. P. 158.Moscow.

MOONEY, R. 1963. A conceptual model for integrating approaches to the identification of creative talent. Scientific creativity: its recognition and development. pp. 331-340. Moscow.

MUSSABEKOVA, G. 2015. Professional creation in pedagogical profession of teachers Materials of the international scientific conference Mastery of the teacher and innovation in education. pp. 62-65. Moscow.

NIKANDROV, N. 1987. Kan-Kalik VA Preparation of the future teacher for pedagogical creativity. Sovetskaya pedagogica. Vol. 6. No 1: 14-16. Moscow.

PATRIC, C. 1955. What is creative thinking? Philosophical Library. Moscow.

SHADRIKOV, V. 1987. The initiative and creativity of teachers the decisive force of reform. Narodnoe obrazovanie. No 4. pp. 1316.Moscow.

SHCHERBAKOV, A. 1987. The initiative and creativity of teachers the decisive force of reform. Vol. 4. pp. 13-16. Moscow.

SLASTENIN, V. 1997. Pedagogy: innovative activity. Education. P. 269. Moscow.

STARKWEZER, E. 1976. Creativity research instruments designed for use with preschool children. Assessing creative growth: The test book. Creative Education Foundation, pp. 79-90. Moscow.

TORRANCE, E. 1988. The Nature of Creativity as Manifest in its Testing. The Nature of Creativity. Cambridge. Press. Pp.32-75. Russia.

ZAGVYAZINSKY, V. 1987. Pedagogical creativity of teachers. Pedagogika. P.135. Russia.