Notes
Update of the geographical distribution and new records of the fauna of Culicidae (Diptera) of northwestern Argentina
Actualización de la distribución geográfica y nuevos registros de la fauna de Culicidae (Diptera) del Noroeste Argentino
Update of the geographical distribution and new records of the fauna of Culicidae (Diptera) of northwestern Argentina
Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, vol. 82, núm. 1, 2023
Sociedad Entomológica Argentina
Recepción: 10 Mayo 2022
Aprobación: 19 Enero 2023
Abstract: The knowledge about the geographical distribution of Aedes patersoni Shanon and Del Ponte, Ae. scapularis (Rondani), Culex dolosus (Lynch Arribálzaga), Mansonia indubitans Dyar and Shannon, Psorophora cingulata (Fabricius), Toxorhynchites haemorrhoidalis separatus (Lynch Arribálzaga), Tx. purpureus (Theobald), Tx. theobaldi s. l. Dyar & Knab and Uranotaenia lowii Theobald in the Northwest of Argentina is extended. Likewise, they provided the first known localities for Ma. indubitans in the province of Salta and for Ae. serratus (Theobald), Ma. titillans (Walker) and Ps. ciliata (Fabricius) in the province of Jujuy. The presence of Ae. fulvithorax (Lutz), Ps. pallescens Edwards in Jujuy, Ur. pulcherrima Lynch Arribálzaga in Santiago del Estero and Anopheles pictipennis (Philippi) in Argentina, is discussed. This contribution updates the list of mosquitoes for the northwestern provinces of Argentina, increasing their numbers of species in Jujuy, La Rioja, Salta, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán to 68, 26, 102, 29 and 70 species, respectively. Additionally, information on the habitat of immature stages and the sanitary importance of the species mentioned is provided, as well as a complete list of the species present in the northwestern provinces of Argentina.
Keywords: Chaco region, Distribution, Monte region, Mosquito richness, Yungas region.
Resumen: Se amplía el conocimiento sobre la distribución geográfica de Aedes patersoni Shanon y Del Ponte, Ae. scapularis (Rondani), Culex dolosus (Lynch Arribálzaga), Mansonia indubitans Dyar y Shannon, Psorophora cingulata (Fabricius), Toxorhynchites haemorrhoidalis separatus (Lynch Arribálzaga), Tx. purpureus (Theobald), Tx. theobaldi s. l. Dyar & Knab y Uranotaenia lowii Theobald en el Noroeste de Argentina. Asimismo, brindan las primeras localidades conocidas para Ma. indubitans en la provincia de Salta y para Ae. serratus (Theobald), Ma. titillans (Walker) y Ps. ciliata (Fabricius) en la provincia de Jujuy. Se discute sobre la presencia de Ae. fulvithorax (Lutz) en la provincia de Salta, de Ps. pallescens Edwards en la provincia de Jujuy, de Ur. pulcherrima Lynch Arribálzaga en Santiago del Estero y de Anopheles pictipennis (Philippi) en Argentina. Esta contribución actualiza la lista de mosquitos para las provincias del noroeste argentino, incrementando su número en Jujuy, La Rioja, Salta, Santiago del Estero y Tucumán a 68, 26, 102, 29 y 70 especies, respectivamente. Adicionalmente, se aporta información sobre el hábitat en el que se recolectaron y la importancia sanitaria de las especies mencionadas, así como una lista completa de las especies presentes en las provincias del noroeste argentino.
Palabras clave: Distribución, Diversidad de mosquitos, Región Chaqueña, Región del Monte, Región de las Yungas.
The Northwest of Argentina (NWA) is a vast region composed by Catamarca, Jujuy, Salta, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán provinces, covering an area of 559,864 km. (Instituto Geográfico Militar, 2021). Its mountainous relief to the west and plains to the east, plus the marked altitudinal gradient, between other factors, allow the existence of six phytogeographic regions: Chaco, High Andean, Monte, Prepuna, Puna and Yungas (Cabrera, 1976), which provides a variety of environments that present a great biodiversity. The NWA has been the scene of epidemics of mosquito-borne diseases, with several studies related to its diversity focused in the area during the first half of the 20th century (Linares et al., 2011). Subsequent re-emerging diseases such as dengue and the outbreaks and spread of Saint Louis encephalitis during the last two decades (Almirón, 2010; Contigiani, 2010) have motivated the continuity and expansion of mosquito studies in the NWA.
Knowledge of mosquito geographic distribution, both within a country and continental, is of great importance to identify areas of potential risk in the transmission of pathogens and to implement management programs. Thus, several studies that integrated the existing information have been carried out by Mitchell & Darsie (1985), Campos & Maciá (1998) and Rossi (2015). Later Linares et al. (2016), Veggiani Aybar & Rossi (2017), Stein et al. (2018) and Dantur Juri et al. (2020), updated the list of species for different provinces of Argentina, including those of the NWA. Stein et al. (2018) cited the presence of 246 mosquito species in Argentina, of which 125 are present in the NWA.
Mitchell & Darsie (1985) carried out an exhaustive bibliographic review from which they provided the first list that grouped all the mosquito species known in Argentina at that moment. Despite the depth of their work, the bibliography has been found with citations of species that were not included, those that were maintained until the present, and were not corrected by subsequent reviewers such as Rossi (2015). In addition, for several species, there are no data on the distribution beyond mentioning the presence in a given province.
Based on these reasons, and on the mosquito surveys carried out in NWA provinces in recent years, the aim of this work is to update the knowledge of the mosquito fauna present in the NWA, to provide precise locations for those species which information is lacking, and to save wrong information in order to improve the mosquito distribution database.
As part of field studies on mosquito diversity and ecological and entomological surveillance of arboviruses, carried out between 2000 and 2019 in the NWA, samples were collected from 20 sites in the provinces of Jujuy (11), Salta (4), Tucumán (3) and La Rioja (2). Specimens deposited in the collection of the División Entomología, Museo de La Plata, Argentina (MLP), and bibliographic information omitted since its publication, from a site in Santiago del Estero, were also added (site 21) (Fig. 1).
Adult specimens were collected from Shannon light traps or CDC light trap baited with CO., while immature stages (larva-pupa) were collected from ground-level puddles, ponds, and pools with a 300 ml dipper, and from phytotelmata with a siphon or pipette.
Larvae and pupae were reared in the laboratory to obtain the corresponding adults. The female and male adults were pin-mounted and the immature stages and male genitalia were mounted in Canada balsam on microscope slides. Species were identified based on original descriptions, redescriptions and diagnostic keys by Consoli & de Oliveira (1994); Darsie (1985); Forattini (2002); Lane (1953) and principally specific literature that is indicated in each case.
The following information is provided for each species: Material examined (M.E.): PROVINCE, Department: Locality: site number (geographic coordinates; meters above sea level (m a. s. l.)); Phytogeographic region of the sampling site): date of collection: number of specimens examined, stage and sex of each specimen. Additional data about method of capture, habitat and / or micro-habitat. Collector (coll.) and taxonomist (det.). Collection number. The abbreviations used are the following: male (M), male genitalia (MG), female (F), fourth instar larvae (L), larval exuvia (LE). Information on its current distribution in Argentina and medical importance are also provided.
Specimens are deposited in the entomological collections of the Instituto de Biología de la Altura, Universidad Nacional de Jujuy (INBIAL), Instituto Fundación Miguel Lillo, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (IFML), Instituto de Biología de la Conservación y Paleobiología, Universidad Nacional de La Rioja (IBICOPA) and División Entomología, Museo de La Plata (MLP).
We follow the taxonomic proposal of Wilkerson et al. (2015) and Harbach (2013) for the species of the Aedini tribe.
The updated distribution of species in Jujuy, La Rioja and Santiago del Estero provinces is based on Dyar (1921), Linares et al. (2016) and Dantur Juri et al. (2020), and for Tucumán province on Veggiani Aybar & Rossi (2017) and Dantur Juri et al. (2020).

Aedes (Ochlerotatus) patersoniShannon & Del Ponte (1927)
M.E.: TUCUMÁN, Famaillá: El Guayal: site 18 (26°56’30.96” S, 65°28’12.11” W, 618m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2002-XI-8, 1 M., 1 MG. The specimens were collected with Shannon light trap in a peri-urban area of the slightly demounted forest region of the Yungas. Córdoba Lanús coll. and Molina det. IFML.GAM.0001.
Current distribution in Argentina: Formosa, Jujuy, Salta and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: Unknown.
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) scapularis (Rondani)
M.E.: LA RIOJA, Capital: La Rioja: site 20 (29°25’53.47” S, 66°52’8.93” W, 535m a. s. l.; Monte): 2014-I-19, 1F; 2014-I-22, 1F; 2014-II-27, 1F; 2014-III-04, 3F. Specimens were captured with CDC light trap baited with CO. in the campus of the National University of La Rioja, an urban area. Visintin coll. and det. IBICOPA-AMV.001.27
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Catamarca, Chaco, Córdoba, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Formosa, Jujuy, La Rioja, Mendoza, Misiones, Río Negro, Salta, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance:Arnell (1976) mentions the isolation of 15 viruses from this species, including Yellow Fever and Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis (VEE). It is also involved in the transmission of Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy) and Wuchereria bancrofti (Cobbold) (Walter Reed Biosystematic Unit, 2021).
Aedes (Ochlerotatus) serratus (Theobald)
M.E.: JUJUY, Ledesma: Caimancito: site 8 (23°42´7.02” S, 64°35´14.44” W, 393m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2001-II-13: 1 F. The species is previously recorded in Jujuy without other data. It was collected with a CDC light trap baited with CO. in a peri-urban area belonging to the Yungas premontane forest. Augier coll. and Molina det. IFML.GAM. 00028.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Formosa, Jujuy, Mendoza, Misiones, Río Negro, Salta, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: Specimens naturally infected by the Yellow Fever virus were found in Brazil by Souza et al. (2010).
Culex (Culex) dolosus (Lynch Arribálzaga)
M.E.: LA RIOJA, Castro Barros: Anillaco, near the town: site 19 (28°48’51.38” S, 66°56’51.41” W; 1412m m a. s. l.; Prepuna): 2004-IV-30, 3 M, 6 F, 4 LE, 5 L. Larvae were collected in a pond wholly exposed to the sun. Marti coll. and Rossi det. MLPDipC 2624-2637.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Catamarca, Chubut, Córdoba, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Jujuy, La Pampa, La Rioja, Misiones, Neuquén, Río Negro, Salta, Santa Fe and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: Unknown.
Mansonia (Rynchotaenia) indubitans Dyar y Shannon
M.E.: JUJUY, Ledesma: Caimancito: site 8 (23°42’7.02” S; 64°35’14.44” W; 393m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2001-II-13, 1F. Female was captured with a CDC light trap baited with CO. in a peri-urban area belonging to the Yungas premontane forest. Augier coll. and Molina det. IFML.GAM.0002.
SALTA, General José de San Martín: Caraparí, near the Itiyuro dam: site 12 (22°06’04.5’’S, 63°44’04.9’’W, 567m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2018-X-18, 1F. The species is previously recorded in Salta without other data. Moreno, Kuruc, Siches and Rosin coll. and Siches and Rossi det. MLPDipC 4908.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Córdoba, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Formosa, Jujuy, Misiones, Salta and Santa Fe provinces.
Medical importance:Mansonia indubitans is moderately susceptible to being infected with VEE virus (Pisano et al., 2010). This species was recorded in great abundance both indoors and outdoors during studies on human case of VEE (Ferro et al., 2008), and is therefore considered by the authors to be a species that may be important in the transmission of this virus.
Mansonia (Mansonia) titillans (Walker)
M.E.: JUJUY, Dr. Manuel Belgrano: San Salvador de Jujuy: the species is previously recorded in Jujuy without other data. Site 4 (24°10’56.7” S, 65°16’26.10” W, 1303m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2012-II-8, 1F; 2012-XI-22, 1F; 2012-XII-13, 1F; 2013-III-20, 1F. Site 6: (24°13’28.26” S, 65°16’28.8” W, 1260m a. s. l.; Chaco): 2012-XII, 1F. All specimens were collected with a CDC light trap baited with CO.. Linares coll. and det. 51001-05-INBIAL-Culicidae.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Córdoba, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Formosa, Jujuy, Misiones, Salta, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: The virus causing VEE has been recovered from wild-caught Ma. titillans in Trinidad and it is believed that the species may have been an important vector of this virus during an epidemic in Trinidad in 1942-1943 (Gillard, 1944). In addition, this species is known to be a vector of filaria (Carpenter & LaCasse, 1955).
Psorophora (Grabhamia) cingulata (Fabricius)
M.E.: JUJUY, El Carmen: Perico: site 11 (24°22’50.55” S, 65°8’12.91” W; 972m a. s. l.; Chaco): 2014-V-13, 1L. Larva was collected in a clear pool of rainwater, with flooded grass and located at tree shadows in a peri-urban environment. It was found with Culex species and Ps. cyanescens (Coquillett). Linares coll. and Linares and Stein det. 52001-INBIAL-Culicidae.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Jujuy, La Pampa, La Rioja, Misiones, Santa Fe and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: Pisano et al. (2010) found females of Ps. cingulata naturally infected with VEEV complex. Turell et al. (2000) indicate that Ps. cingulata, although is capable of becoming infected, cannot transmit the virus.
Psorophora (Psorohpora) ciliata (Fabricius)
M.E.: JUJUY, Dr. Manuel Belgrano: San Salvador de Jujuy: site 7 (24°10’11.57” S, 65°19’40.81” W 1297m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2017-III-08, 1F. Collected manually in the backyard of a house after a big storm. Ortuño coll. and Linares det. 59001-INBIAL-Culicidae. Santa Bárbara: Palma Sola: site 9 (23°58’35.11” S, 64°18’19.10” W, 688m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2011-IV, 1F. Without collection data. No collector data. Linares det. 59002-INBIAL-Culicidae.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Córdoba, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Formosa, Jujuy, La Pampa, La Rioja, Misiones, Salta, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero y Tucumán.
Medical importance: Unknown.
Toxorhynchites (Ankylorhynchus) purpureus (Theobald)
M.E. TUCUMÁN, Yerba Buena: Horco Molle: site 17 (26°46’37.46” S, 65°19’54.12” W; 748m a. s. l.; Yungas): 1961-X-03, 1M. No collector data. Rossi det. MLPDipC 2328.
Current distribution in Argentina: Corrientes, Misiones and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: None.
Toxorhynchites .Lynchiella. haemorrhoidalis separatus (Lynch Arribálzaga)
ME: SALTA, General José de San Martín: Aguaray: site 13 (22°14’29.18” S; 63°44'0.10” W; 580m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2000-IV, 1L. Tartagal: site 14 (22°30’58.88” S, 63°48'18.83” W; 498m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2000-IV, 1L. Both collected from bromeliads, at ground level. Zaidenberg coll. and Rossi det. MLPDipC 2153 and MLPDipC 2152, respectively.
Current distribution in Argentina: Chaco, Corrientes, Formosa, Misiones, Salta, Santa Fe and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: None.
Toxorhynchites (Lynchiella) theobaldi s. l. Dyar & Knab, 1906
M.E.: JUJUY, Dr. Manuel Belgrano: San Salvador de Jujuy: site 1 (24°10’45.85” S, 65°16’8.14” W; 1302m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2017-II-16, 1L; 2017-III-17, 2L; site 2 (24°11’0.46” S, 65°16’27.56” W; 1279m a. s. l; Yungas): 2017-II-16, 1L; site 3 (24°11’0.46 “ S, 65°16’27.56" W; 1280m a. s. l; Yungas): 2017-II-16, 1L; site 5 (24°9’56.27” S, 65°18’58.18” W; 1322m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2017-II-16, 3L. San Antonio: Los Ávalos: site 10 (24°20’49.05” S, 65°14’50.39” W; 1167m a. s. l.; Chaco): 20-II-2017, 2L; 7-IV-2017, 2L.
Larvae of this species were collected from Aechmea distichantha Lem. (sites 1, 2 and 10); Tillandsia australis Mez. (site 5) and a tree hole (site 3) in urban (sites 1, 2, 3 and 5) and suburban environments (site 10). They were found with larvae of Cx. imitator Theobald and Tx. guadeloupensis (Dyar & Knab) in suburban environments, while in urban environments they were found with Ae. aegypti (L.). Apumaita coll. and Apumaita, Linares and Stein det. 80001-011-INBIAL-Culicidae.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Corrientes, Formosa, Jujuy, Misiones and Salta provinces.
Medical importance: None.
Uranotaenia (Uranotaenia) lowii Theobald
M.E.: SALTA, Molinos, Laguna de Brealito: site 15 (25°17'53.49” S, 66°21’58.03” W; 2559m a. s. l.; Prepuna): 1961-VI, 1 F. No collector data. Rossi det. MLPDipC 1230.
TUCUMÁN, Burruyacu: El Timbó: site 16 (26°36’48.57” S, 65°7’46.20” W; 843m a. s. l.; Yungas): 2002-IV-27, 25
F. Adults were collected with Shannon light trap in a partially deforested area. Claps, Augier, Dantur Juri and Molina coll. and Molina det. IFML.GAM.0003-00027.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Córdoba, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Formosa, Jujuy, Misiones, Salta, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: Unknown.
Table I shows the complete and updated list of mosquito species present in the NWA provinces.

Aedes (Howardina) fulvithorax (Lutz)
Rossi (2015) excludes this species because the material collected by Carcavallo et al. (1995) in the province of Salta has not been found and there are no data that give details of them. On the other hand, the material deposited in the MLP from Misiones (D'Oria et al., 2010) is so damaged that its correct identification is impossible. Therefore, and according to Martinez & Prosen (1955) and Berlin (1959) who indicate that this species is not present in Argentina, these records should be considered suspect at best. For these reasons Ae. fulvithorax is excluded from the list of species present in Argentina from the present study.
Anopheles (Nyssorhynchus) pictipennis (Philippi)
Martini (1931) mentioned the presence of a specimen from San José, northern Argentina, X.25 (October 1925). This species is considered of doubtful occurrence in Argentina by Duret (1950), who could not locate where San José is found, and since the species is only cited for a small area of Chile. Besides, for Bejarano (1959 (1960)), San José is in the province of Salta, and for García & Ronderos (1962), San José is in the province of Formosa. The latter authors stated about the presence of An. pictipennis “according to the itinerary trip of the Deutsche Chaco Expedition, we suppose that the appointment corresponds to the so-called place in the province of Formosa. Regarding the correct identification of these specimens, we cannot comment since we have not observed the specimens. However, we are inclined to think that it is not the species mentioned by Martini, since its origin has not been verified later, and even the research carried out to date coincides in restricting it to the trans-Andean zone”. To these explanations we must add the dozens of publications on mosquitoes and Anopheles in particular that deal with the fauna of the NWA without the mentioned species appearing. Currently, the distribution of An. pictipennis is restricted to Chile; Rueda et al. (2008) expand the distribution, and Gonzalez & Mureb Sallum (2009) designate the Neotype and again expand its distribution, although always in Chile. Belkin et al. (1968) state that the two males with which Philippi worked with do not exist and Linthicum (1988) has the same opinion as González & Mureb Sallum (2009). These reasons justify dismissing the species as present in Argentina.
Psorophora (Psorophora) pallescens Edwards
Visintin et al. (2010) unintentionally included this species for the province of Jujuy, which was also cited by Rossi (2015), but Ps. pallescens was never found in this province.
Toxorhynchites purpureus is the first record in the NWA, it is also the first record in the Yungas, previously distributed in Argentina only in Misiones´s forest and Corrientes province (Duret, 1951; Rossi et al., 2002). Likewise, Ae. patersoni, Ae. serratus, Ma. indubitans, Ma. titillans, Ps. ciliata, Tx. haemorroidalis, Tx theobaldi, Ur. lowii extend their distribution to Yungas. Psorophora cingulata, Ma. titillans and Ur. pulcherrima to Chaco, while Cx. dolosus and Ur. lowii to Prepuna.
Uranotaenia pulcherrima was cited by Dyar (1921) for the province of Santiago del Estero, Sarmiento: Chuña Palma: site 21 (28°15’25.20” S, 63°30’15,12” W; 126m a. s. l.; Chaco): 1909-III-12. E. R. Wagner coll. and Dyar det., MNHN, Paris. However, this data is not found in the list provided by Mitchell and Darsie (1985), although other provinces are included. No publications have been found between 1921 and 1985 that indicate the need to remove it from Santiago del Estero. Therefore we consider that the omission was involuntary and that the presence of Ur. pulcherrima in Santiago del Estero should be taken as valid.
Current distribution in Argentina: Buenos Aires, Chaco, Córdoba, Corrientes, Entre Ríos, Formosa, Misiones, Salta, Santa Fe, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán provinces.
Medical importance: Unknown.
This work updates the species distribution list for the NWA provinces. Thus, so far, the total number of species present in Catamarca, Jujuy, La Rioja, Salta, Santiago del Estero and Tucumán is 23, 68, 26, 102, 29 and 70, respectively. The total number of species for the NWA region is 123. With the exclusion of Ae. fulvithorax and An. pictipennis, the total number of mosquito species present in Argentina is 247.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Fundación Mundo Sano for supplemental CO2 to operate light traps. This work was supported in part by SeCTER, UNJu (F-C002 and F/B004) and SECYT, UNLaR (27/A442). MS and WRA are members of the researcher career of CONICET.
References
Almirón, W.R. (2010) Mosquitos vectores de los virus de Encefalitis de San Luis y del Nilo Occidental del Dengue y Fiebre Amarilla. XXIX Jornadas de actualización en Ciencias Veterinarias. Villa Giardino, Córdoba.
Arnell, J.H. (1976) Mosquito Studies (Diptera, Culicidae) XXXIII. A revision of the scapularis group of Aedes .Ochlerotatus). Contributions of the American Entomological Institute, 13(3), 1-144.
Bejarano, J.F. (1959) (1960). Anopheles de la República Argentina y sus relaciones con el paludismo. Primeras Jornadas Entomoepidemiológicas Argentinas (ed. Bejarano, J.F.R., Del Ponte E., & Orfila, R.N.). Buenos Aires. pp. 305-329.
Belkin, J.N., Schick, R.X., & Heinemann, S.J. (1968) XI. Mosquitoes originally described from Argentina, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Perú and Uruguay. Contributions of the American Entomological Institute, 4(1), 9-19.
Berlin, O.G.W. (1959) Mosquito studies. (D.C.) XII. A revision of the Neotropical subgenus Howardina of Aedes. Contributions of th American Entomology Institute, 4 (2), 1-190.
Cabrera, A.L. (1976) Regiones fitogeográficas argentinas. EN: Kugler W. F. (Dir.) Enciclopedia argentina de agricultura y jardinería (85pp). Buenos Aires. Tomo 2. (2ª edición). Acme. Fascículo 1.
Campos, R.E., & Maciá, A. (1998) Culicidae. Biodiversidad de Artrópodos Argentinos. Una perspectiva biotaxonómica (dirs. Morrone, J.J., & Coscarón, S.), pp. 291-303. Ediciones Sur, La Plata.
Carcavallo, R.U., Curto De Casas, S.I., & Burgos, J.J. (1995) Blood Feeding Diptera: Epidemiological significance and relation to the climate change. Entomología y Vectores, 2(2-3), 35-60.
Carpenter, S.J., & LaCasse, W.J. (1955) Mosquitoes of Norh America north of Mexico. p. 109 University California Press, Berkeley.
Consoli, R.A.G.B., & de Oliveira, R.L. (1994) Principais mosquitos de importância sanitária no Brasil. 228 pp. Editora Fiocruz, Rio de Janeiro.
Contigiani, M.S. (2010) Situación actual del Virus del Nilo Occidental (West Nile Virus) en la Argentina. XXIX Jornadas de actualización en Ciencias Veterinarias. Villa Giardino, Córdoba.
Dantur Juri, M.J., Villarroel Martínez, E.I., Flores, G.C., Stein, M., & Mureb Sallum, M.A. (2020) New records of mosquito species in Northwestern Argentina. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 36(3), 201-203.
Darsie, R.F. Jr. (1985). The mosquitoes of Argentina: Part I. Keys for identification of adult females and fourth stage larvae in English and Spanish (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosquito Systematic, 17(1), 153-253.
D’Oria, J., Marti, D., & Rossi, G.C. (2010). Culicidae, province of Misiones, northeastern Argentina. Check List,6(1), 176-179.
Duret, J.P. (1950) Lista de los mosquitos de la República Argentina (Diptera: Culicidae). Revista de la Sociedad Entomológica Argentina, 14(5), 297-318.
Duret, J.P. (1951). Contribución al conocimiento de la distribución geográfica de los culícidos argentinos (Diptera-Culicidae)-Parte IV. Revista de La Sanidad Militar Argentina,50(3), 372-388.
Dyar, H.G. (1921) The mosquitoes of Argentina. Insecutor Inscitiae Menstruus, ., 148-150.
Ferro, C., Olano, V.A., Ahumada, M., & Waver, S. (2008) Mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae) en el caserío de Chinagalé, Santander, donde se registró un caso humano de encefalitis equina venezolana. Biomédica, 28(2), 234–244. Available on http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/bio/v28n2/v28n2a08.pdf
Forattini, O.P. (2002) Culicidologia Médica. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
García, M., & Ronderos, R.A. (1962) Mosquitos de la República Argentina. I. Tribu Anophelini (Diptera: Culicidae). Anales de la Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la provincia de Buenos Aires, ., 103-212.
Gillard, R.T. (1944) Mosquito Transmission of Venezuelan Virus Equine Encephalo-myelitis in Trinidad. Butts U. S. Army Medical Department, 75, 98-107.
Gonzalez, C.R., & Mureb Sallum, M.A. (2009) Neotype designation and redescription of adult male and immature stages of Anopheles .Nyssorhynchus. pictipennis (Philippi) (Diptera: Culicidae). Zootaxa, 2295, 15-24.
Harbach, R. E. 2013. Mosquito Taxonomic Inventory. [Accessed on 21 October 2021] at: http://mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.info/
Instituto Geográfico Militar (IGM). (2021) División política, superficie y población. Last accessed 30 September 2021 at: https://www.ign.gob.ar/NuestrasActividades/Geografia/DatosArgentina/DivisionPolitica
Lane, J. (1953) Neotropical Culicidae. Editora da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Linares, M.A., Moreno, M.A., Neder, L.E., & Almirón, W.R. (2011) Acciones de investigación y extensión del INBIAL en la prevención de enfermedades transmitidas por mosquitos. Actas del IV Simposio Internacional de Investigación. Experiencias innovadoras en investigación Aplicada (comp. Peñaranda, F.V., Zazarini, S.B., & Bejarano, I.F.), pp. 503-509, Ediciones UCSE, San Salvador de Jujuy.
Linares, M.A., Laurito, M., Visintin, A.M., Rossi, G.C., Stein, M., & Almirón, W.R. (2016) New mosquito records (Diptera: Culicidae) from northwestern Argentina. Check List, 12(4), 1944, 5. Available on https://checklist.pensoft.net/article/19546/
Linthicum, K.J. (1988) A revision of the Argyritarsis section of the subgenus Nyssorhynchus of Anopheles. Mosquito Systematics, 22 (2), 98-271.
Martinez, A., & Prosen, A.F. (1955) Las especies de Aedes .Howardina) de Argentina y Bolivia. Misión de Estudios de Patología Regiomnal Argentina, 26, 21-41.
Martini, E. (1931) Gie Ausbeute der deutschen Chaco-Expedition 1925/26-Diptera. XXV. Culicidae. Konowia, 10(2), 116-120.
Mitchell, C.J., & Darsie, C.H. (1985) Mosquitoes of Argentina. Part II. Geographic distribution and bibliography (Diptera: Culicidae). Mosquito Systematics, 17(4), 279-360.
Pisano, M.B., Ré, V.E., Díaz, L.A., Farías, A., Stein, M., Sánchez-Seco, M.P., Tenorio, A., Almirón, W.R., & Contigiani. M.S. (2010) Enzootic Activity of Pixuna and Rio Negro Viruses (Venezuelan Equine Encephalitis complex) in a Neotropical Region of Argentina. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases, 10, 199-201.
Rossi, G.C., Krsticevic, F.J., & Pascual, N.T. (2002). Mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae) en el área de influencia de la represa de Yacyretá. Argentina. Neotrópica, 48: 23-35.
Rossi, G.C. (2015) Annotated checklist, distribution, and taxonomic bibliography of the mosquitoes (Insecta: Diptera: Culicidae) of Argentina. Check List, 11(4), 1-15.
Rueda, L.M., Rodriguez, J.A., Bertudio, M.C., Pecor, J.E., Li, C., & Wilkerson, R.C. (2008) Anopheles .Nyssorhynchus. picripennis: a new mosquito record from the Atacama region of northern Chile. Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association, 24(3), 448-449.
Shannon, R.C., & Del Ponte, E. (1927) Los Culícidos en la Argentina. Revista del Instituto Bacteriológico, 5(1), 29-140.
Souza, R.P., Foster, P.G., Sallum, M.A.M., Coimbra, T.L.M., Maeda, A.Y., Silveira, V.R., Moreno, E.S., da Silva, F.G., Rocco, I.M., et al. (2010) Detection of a new yellow fever virus lineage within the South American genotype I in Brazil. Journal of Medical Virology,82,175–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.21606
Stein, M., Alvarez, C.N., Alonso, A.C., Bangher, F.N., Willener, J.A., & Campos, R.E. (2018) New records of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) found in phytotelmata in Northern Argentina. Zootoaxa, 1399(1), 87-100.
Turell, M.J., Jones, J.W, Sardelis, M.R., Dohm, D.J., Coleman, R.E., Watts, D.M., Fernandez, R., Calampa, C., & Klein, T.A. (2000) Vector competence of peruvian mosquitoes (Diptera:Culicidae) for epizootic and enzootic strains of Venezuelan Equine Encephalomyelitis virus. Journal of Medical Entomology, 37, 835-839.
Veggiani Aybar, C.A., & Rossi, G.C. (2017) Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of the meridian zone of the subtropical mountainous rainforest of Argentina: update on the fauna and geographical distribution. Check List, 13(2), 2102.
Visintin, A., Laurito, M., Stein, M.; Ramírez, P., Molina, G., Lorenzo, P.R., & Almirón, W.R. (2010) Two new mosquito species and six new provincial records in Argentina. Journal American Mosquito Control Association, 26(1), 91-94.
Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit (2021). Last Accessed 22st May 2021 at: https://www.wrbu.si.edu/vectorspecies
Wilkerson, R.C., Linton, Y.M., Fonseca D.M., & Schultz, T.R. (2015) Making mosquito taxonomy useful: a stable classification of the tribe Aedini that balances utility with current knowledge of evolutionary relationships. PLOS One, 10(7), 1-25.
Notas de autor
mlinares@inbial.unju.edu.ar