Servicios
Descargas
Buscar
Idiomas
P. Completa
Evaluation of the aggressiveness and sporulation of the citrus green mold pathogen, Penicillium digitatum, in Northern Iran
Ghorbani Khatir, Ghasem; Aghajani, Mohammad Ali; Zolfaghari, Amir;
Ghorbani Khatir, Ghasem; Aghajani, Mohammad Ali; Zolfaghari, Amir; Rabbani Nasab, Hojjatollah
Evaluation of the aggressiveness and sporulation of the citrus green mold pathogen, Penicillium digitatum, in Northern Iran
Evaluación de la agresividad y esporulación del patógeno del moho verde de los cítricos, Penicillium digitatum, en el norte de Irán
Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society, vol. 16, núm. 2, pp. 92-105, 2025
Selva Andina Research Society
resúmenes
secciones
referencias
imágenes

Abstract: Green mold, caused by Penicillium digitatum, is the most destructive postharvest disease in citrus, leading to major economic losses globally. This study aimed to assess the epidemiological traits, pathogenicity, and aggressiveness of P. digitatum isolates from citrus fruits in Northern Iran. A total of 150 citrus samples were collected from orchards and warehouses across three regions. Isolates were purified using the single-spore method and examined microscopically. Pathogenicity tests involved inoculating oranges with spore suspensions, recording infection frequency (IF), lesion area (LA), sporulation capacity (SC), incubation period (IP), and latent period (LP). Data analysis included ANOVA, Pearson correlation, regression, and cluster analysis. All 88 isolates showed 100 % pathogenicity. LA ranged from 40-80 %, and SC from 7.25×107 to 2.37×108 spores. The average IP and LP were 2.3 and 5.4 days, respectively. A strong correlation (r = 0.8) was found between SC and the composite aggressiveness index (CAI), while IP and LP were inversely correlated with CAI. Cluster analysis grouped isolates into four categories based on aggressiveness, indicating genetic diversity without geographic clustering. These findings demonstrate the high aggressiveness of P. digitatum isolates in Northern Iran and underline the urgent need for targeted postharvest management strategies. This research contributes to understanding the pathogen’s behavior and supports future development of region-specific control measures.

Keywords: Green mold, Penicillium digitatum, citrus fruits, postharvest disease, pathogenicity.

Resumen: El moho verde, causado por Penicillium digitatum, es la enfermedad poscosecha más destructiva en los cítricos, causando importantes pérdidas económicas a nivel mundial. Este estudio evaluó las características epidemiológicas, la patogenicidad y la agresividad de aislados de P. digitatum en frutas cítricas del norte de Irán. Se recolectaron 150 muestras de cítricos en huertos y almacenes de tres regiones. Los aislados se purificaron mediante el método de esporas únicas y se examinaron microscópicamente. Las pruebas de patogenicidad consistieron en inocular naranjas con suspensiones de esporas, registrando la frecuencia de infección (IF), el área de lesión (LA), la capacidad de esporulación (SC), el período de incubación (IP) y el período latente (LP). El análisis de datos incluyó ANOVA, correlación de Pearson, regresión y análisis de conglomerados. Los 88 aislados mostraron una patogenicidad del 100 %. LA varió entre 40-80 %, y SC entre 7.25×107 y 2.37×108 esporas. Los promedios de IP y LP fueron 2.3 y 5.4 días. Se observó una fuerte correlación (r = 0.8) entre SC y el índice compuesto de agresividad (CAI), mientras que IP y LP se correlacionaron inversamente con CAI. El análisis agrupó los aislados en cuatro categorías según su agresividad, revelando diversidad genética sin agrupamiento geográfico. Estos hallazgos destacan la alta agresividad de los aislados de P. digitatum en el norte de Irán y la necesidad urgente de estrategias de manejo poscosecha. Este estudio proporciona una base para futuras investigaciones epidemiológicas y medidas de control específicas.

Palabras clave: Moho verde, Penicillium digitatum, cítricos, enfermedad postcosecha, patogenicidad.

Carátula del artículo

ARTÍCULO ORIGINAL

Evaluation of the aggressiveness and sporulation of the citrus green mold pathogen, Penicillium digitatum, in Northern Iran

Evaluación de la agresividad y esporulación del patógeno del moho verde de los cítricos, Penicillium digitatum, en el norte de Irán

Ghorbani Khatir, Ghasem*
Department of Agriculture, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, República Islámica del Irán
Aghajani, Mohammad Ali
Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education. Department of Plant Protection Research. Center of Golestan Province. Gorgan, República Islámica del Irán
Zolfaghari, Amir
Department of Agriculture, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, República Islámica del Irán
Federal University of Lavras. Department of Phytopathology. MG, Brasil
Rabbani Nasab, Hojjatollah
Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education. Department of Plant Protection Research. Center of Golestan Province. Gorgan, República Islámica del Irán
Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society, vol. 16, núm. 2, pp. 92-105, 2025
Selva Andina Research Society

Recepción: 01 Diciembre 2024

Corregido: 01 Abril 2025

Aprobación: 01 Junio 2025

Publicación: 01 Agosto 2025

Introduction

Iran is one of the world’s top ten producers of citrus, with approximately 276,000 hectares under cultivation and an annual output of around 4 million tons of citrus fruits1. However, postharvest diseases, particularly green mold caused by P. digitatum, significantly threaten fruit quality and marketability2. Green mold is the most common and economically damaging postharvest citrus disease globally, with reported losses ranging from 10 to 80 % depending on region and management practices2,3. The fungus produces abundant airborne spores that contaminate orchards, packinghouses, storage facilities, and transportation systems4. Several studies have highlighted the dominant role of P. digitatum in postharvest fruit rot. In Spain, Penicillium species account for 55-80 % of decay cases, while in South Africa, green mold was responsible for 75 % of fruit rot in exported citrus5,6. Fruit wounds sustained during harvesting serve as entry points for the pathogen, especially under warm and humid conditions, although fungicide treatments can reduce infection rates to as low as 2-4 %, untreated fruits may suffer 15-30 % decay7.

Despite global attention to the epidemiology and control of P. digitatum, there is a lack of data from Iran, especially on the aggressiveness and sporulation potential of local isolates. Previous studies in the country have largely focused on fungicide efficacy rather than the biological characteristics of the pathogen.

Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the epidemiological traits, pathogenicity, and aggressiveness of P. digitatum isolates collected from citrus-producing regions in Northern Iran. Understanding local pathogen variability is essential for developing effective, region-specific disease management strategies and

reducing postharvest losses. The results of this research can serve as a foundation for future epidemiological studies and the formulation of targeted control measures in Iran’s citrus industry.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and fungal isolation. A total of 150 citrus fruit samples exhibiting green mold symptoms were randomly collected from orchards and storage warehouses across three citrus-producing regions of Northern Iran: Gorgan (eastern), Sari and Ghaemshahr (central), and Ramsar and Tonkabon (western). Samples were transported under cold conditions and processed within 24 h. P. digitatum was isolated on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA). To ensure purity, single-spore isolation was performed as previously described by Ho & Ko8 and Zhang et al.9.

Purification and morphological identification. After incubation at 25° C for 7 days, colonies were examined for typical green sporulation and transferred to fresh PDA plates. Morphological identification was based on colony color, texture, and microscopic features of conidiophores and conidia, using lactophenol cotton blue staining following Pitt & Hocking10 and methods used in recent studies Desouki et al.11.

Pathogenicity assay. Pathogenicity tests were conducted on surface-disinfected oranges. Fruits were washed, sterilized with 95 % ethanol, and wounded (1×2 mm). A 100 µL aliquot of a 5×106 spores mL-1 suspension was inoculated into each wound. Inoculated fruits (n=10 per isolate) were incubated at 25° C in high-humidity chambers for 7 days This protocol was adapted from Wang et al.12.

Assessment of disease indices:

Frequency infection index. The infection frequency index (IF) is assessed daily, starting from the initiation of inoculation until the completion of rot pro-gression. This index is computed as a percentage by counting the number of oranges exhibiting visible signs or symptoms of contamination among the total number of infected oranges for each pure isolate across 10 repetitions.

The IF can be calculated according to the number of infected oranges, if the number is between 0-9, the IF will be 0-100 %, respectively as described by Gonzalez-Candelas13.

Lesion area (necrosis, rot). The necrosis area index (LA) is determined daily, starting from the time of inoculation until the end of the lesion. This index is assessed through visual estimation, based on the percentage of infected fruit tissue area in relation to the total area of the fruit tissue. The common approach involves measuring the length and width of the damage using a ruler (mm), and visually estimating the proportion of the infected tissue area compared to the total surface area of the fruit skin. This index is recorded for each repetition14.

Sporulation capacity (SC). Is determined by quantifying the number of spores or conidia formed within each lesion. To accomplish this, starting from the time of inoculation and continuing daily until the completion of lesion, the area of sporulation within the lesion is visually measured using a ruler (mm). When the sporulation area remains unchanged for three to five consecutive days, the colony from each orange fruit is transferred in its entirety into a beaker (50 mL) of sterile distilled water. The contents are thoroughly agitated, ensuring complete dispersion. Subsequently, a 10 µL droplet of the spore suspension is extracted using a micropipette and dispensed into the hemocytometer slide cells. The number of spores is then counted using an optical microscope. To determine the spore density per unit volume and ensure accuracy, a cell count slide and an optical microscope with 40X magnification were utilized. To enhance reliability, the spore count was repeated three times15.

Incubation period (IP). Can be calculated by determining the minimum time interval from the initiation of inoculation to the appearance of the initial disease symptoms (rot) on each fruit. Therefore, following the initiation of inoculation, the samples were observed twice daily, in the morning and evening, using a manual loupe. Once rot symptoms were detected on samples, the number of days from the commencement of inoculation to the manifestation of the lesion was recorded16.

Latent period (LP). Refers to the minimum time interval from the initiation of inoculation to the onset of the first sporulation on each infected fruit. Accordingly, it is necessary to observe the samples twice daily, in the morning and evening, using a manual loupe. In the case of observing colony cells in the lesion area, a closer examination should be conducted using a stereomicroscope. Once pathogenic sporulation was confirmed on each sample, the number of days from the initiation of inoculation to the appearance of sporulation is recorded16.

Composite aggressiveness index (CAI). Represents the invasive potential of isolates under ideal conditions and is calculated using the following formula17: Higher CAI values represent more aggressive isolates, adapted from Flier & Turkensteen18.

CAI is the composite aggressiveness index, IF is infection frequency, LA is Necrosis Area, SC is the sporulation capacity, IP is the incubation period, and LP is the latent period. Once the CAI value was calculated, the isolates were categorized based on their level of invasion.

Statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics (mean, min, max, SD, CV) were calculated for IF, LA, IP, LP, and SC using Statgraphics Centurion v.19. One-way ANOVA was applied to assess significant differences among isolates. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated to evaluate relationships between variables. Regression analysis was used to generate indicator models. Cluster analysis was performed using Euclidean distance and average linkage to classify isolates based on aggressiveness19.

Results

Infection frequency (IF). A total of 88 isolates of P. digitatum were obtained from citrus samples collected across the studied regions. All isolates presented pathogenicity, with an IF of 100 % in inoculated oranges Figure 1 illustrates representative symptoms of green mold disease on inoculated oranges, showing extensive lesion development and dense sporulation seven days after inoculation.

The figure shows widespread lesion development and sporulation on the fruit surface, the left panel seven days after inoculation, the right panel shows two weeks after inoculation. All isolates exhibited 100 % infection frequency, with varying levels of lesion expansion and sporulation density.


Figure 1
Symptoms of green mold (Penicillium digitatum) infection on artificially inoculated oranges under controlled conditions

The figure shows widespread lesion development and sporulation on the fruit surface, the left panel seven days after inoculation, the right panel shows two weeks after inoculation. All isolates exhibited 100 % infection frequency, with varying levels of lesion expansion and sporulation density.

Table 1
Summary statistics

Descriptive statistics. For lesion area (LA), incubation period (IP), latent period (LP), sporulation capacity (SC), and composite aggressiveness index (CAI) are summarized in Table 1.

LA ranged from 40.0 to 80.0 %, with an average of 55.02 % (CV = 15.44 %, SE = 0.40). IP varied between 2.0 and 4.0 days, average 2.31 days (CV = 20.46 %, SE = 0.02). LP ranged from 4.0 to 6.0 days, average 5.41 days (CV = 9.19 %, SE = 0.02). SC spanned 7.25 × 107 to 2.37 × 108 spores, average 1.32 × 108 (CV = 20.28 %, SE = 1.27 × 106). CAI values extended from 1.73 × 1010 to 2.08 × 1011, mean 6.38 × 1010 (CV = 45.36 %, SE = 1.38 × 109).

Distribution and outliers

Figures 2 and 3 display the average index values and box-and-whisker plots, respectively. Outliers were found in SC and LA but none in IP or LP, confirming data distribution integrity.


Figure 2
The average values of the CAI, SC, LP, IP, and LA indices were calculated for a total of 88 isolates of P. digitatum


Figure 3
Box and whisker plots illustrating the studied indicators

Figure 4 shows Pearson’s correlation results: i) SC-CAI (r = 0.80) and LA-CAI (r = 0.75) are strong positive correlations. ii) IP-CAI and LP-CAI show strong negative correlations (r ≈ -0.65, -0.62). iii) LA correlates moderately with SC (r ≈ 0.46) and weakly negatively with LP (r ≈ -0.27).


Figure 4
Correlation results

Analysis of variance (ANOVA)

Table 2 presents ANOVA results: isolate identity (factor A) significantly affected all indices (p ≤ 0.01), while replication (factor B) had no significant effect demonstrating real biological variability among isolates.

Grouping by index values

Mean comparison allowed grouping isolates into five categories for each index, though these groupings did not align with geographic distribution: i) LA groups ranged from 40-47 % (Group I) up to 70-80 % (Group V). ii) IP groups ranged from 2.0-2.2 days (Group I) to 2.8-3.0 days (Group V). iii) LP groups ranged from 4.8-5.0 days to 5.6-6.0 days. iv) SC groups ranged from 8.25 × 107 to 1.245 × 108 spores. v) CAI groups ranged from ~2.4 × 1010 to ~1.6 × 1011.

Table 2
ANOVA results of LA - SC-IP-LP-CAI (type III sums of squares)

The ANOVA results for the measured parameters (LA, IP, LP, SC, and CAI) indicated significant diversity among the data based on different factors. A significant difference was found among the isolates, while the repetition difference was not significant. The statistical probability level (p ≤ 0.01 %), indicates a significant difference at the 99 % confidence level

Regression Analysis

As shown in Table 3 and Figure 5: i) Linear regressions of CAI on LA, SC, IP, and LP are all significant (p < 0.0001). ii) SC explains ~63.9 % of CAI variance (R²), while LP explains ~38.3 %. iii) Residual plots (Figure 6) confirm appropriate model fit with no major violations.

Table 3
Regression results

Table 4
Classification of isolates based on the cluster test


Figure 5
Regression plot between the CAI and LA (A), SC index (B), IP index (C) and LP (D)


Figure 6
The residuals plot for the LA index (A), SC (B), IP (C), and LP (D)


Figure 7
Classification of isolates based on the cluster test

Table 5
Membership of 88 isolates of Penicillium digitatum under different cluster

Cluster analysis

Cluster analysis using Euclidean distance and average linkage (Statgraphics) grouped isolates into four clusters (Tables 4-5, Figure 7): i) Cluster I (6 isolates): highest aggression CAI (~1.27 × 1011). ii) Cluster II (9 isolates): intermediate-high aggression CAI (~9.53 × 1010). iii) Cluster III (20 isolates): intermediate aggression CAI (~7.60 × 1010). iv) Cluster IV (53 isolates): lowest aggression (CAI ~4.68 × 1010).

No spatial clustering by geographic region was observed.

Discussion

The main objective of this study was to examine the epidemiological aspects, pathogenicity, and aggressiveness of P. digitatum isolates. The findings indicate that all 88 isolates of investigated P. digitatum in this study were capable of causing disease and producing spores, leading to green mold on the fruit. These results highlight the pathogenic potential of the spores, particularly when they come into contact with lesions occurring by 100 % during harvesting and post-harvest stages2,20. Comparatively, Louw & Korsten21, reported disease incidence rates of 100 % in Clementine tangerine, 95 % in New Hall Novel orange, and 90 % in Eureka lemon.

Another study conducted by Neri et al.22 evaluated the aggressiveness of four isolates of Penicillium expansum under laboratory conditions. Their research encompassed pear, apple, apricot, peach, strawberry, and kiwi as hosts. The results indicated that 75 % of the pathogen isolates showed the ability to cause mold in all tested hosts. Additionally, Louw & Korsten23 and Smilanick & Sorenson24, provided the initial report of P. digitatum contamination in pear fruit cultivars, which exhibited greater aggressiveness compared to P. expansum.

Regarding the LA index, this study revealed variations among different isolates, ranging from 40 to 80 %, with an average value of 55.02. Louw & Korsten21, in their research comparing the pathogenicity of various Penicillium spp. species reported that P. digitatum displayed the highest growth of 80-84 mm, with an occurrence percentage of 90-100 % and disease severity ranging from 80-90 %. In contrast, for P. italicum, the highest growth was observed at 34-46 mm, with an occurrence percentage of 79-85 % and disease severity ranging from 20-44 %.The results of the SC index indicated that the sporulation rates varied among the isolates of P. digitatum. After one week, the lowest sporulation rate observed was 7.25E7 spores, while the highest was 2.37E8 spores, with an average sporulation capacity index of 1.32E8 spores. It is worth noting that the investigation of the SC index for P. digitatum species is limited, Holmes & Eckert25 , and there is a lack of specific research on this aspect, Qian et al.26 However, in a study conducted by Nava et al.27 on the heat treatment (121° C) of P. commune on coffee pulp, no significant difference was found in spore production performance based on different treatment durations of 10, 20, 30, and 40 min. According to the results, the highest sporulation yield was observed at 25° C, with an average spore production of 3.7E9 spores g-1 for coffee pulp, Du et al.28.

Regarding the IP index, the results showed variations among the 88 isolates of P. digitatum, with IP ranging from 2 to 3 days and an average value of 2.3 days. Additionally, the LP varied from 4 to 6 days among the isolates, with an average value of 5.4 days (equivalent to 135 degree- days (DD). In a comparable study, Lahlali et al.29 reported that P. digitatum isolates incubated at 25° C under optimal water activity displayed a lag phase of approximately 3 days followed by rapid radial growth, with visible lesion symptoms appearing on fruits within 2 to 3 days after inoculation.

The LP is considered an important trait for invasiveness in plant pathology. Strains of pathogens with shorter LP have been found to cause more disease in previous studies30-33. However, the relationships between host resistance, pathogen feeding type, and LP have not been universally explored across different pathogen systems. The mentioned period typically includes an asymptomatic phase known as the latent period. Based on the findings of this research, it was observed that reducing this period and the LP index was associated with increased pathogen’s aggressiveness and CAI. This finding is consistent with the research conducted by Précigout34, who examined the variability in the LP among 53 pathogens. The study showed a wide range of this parameter, ranging from 45±7.0 DD for the necrotrophic pathogen (Stemphylium botryosum) to 623±65 DD for the hemibiotrophic pathogen of Cercospora coffeicola. Among necrotrophs, the longest LP was observed for Ascochyta fabae, with 134±34 DD. Furthermore, the longest incubation period among biotrophs was 322±30 DD for rusts and peanut leaf rust pathogen Puccinia arachidis. Hemibiotrophs generally exhibited the widest range of LP compared to biotrophs and necrotrophs, with most hemibiotrophs having an average LP of more than 200 DD. C. coffeicola, in particular, exhibited an LP exceeding 600 DD. In summary, a wider range of LP was observed among hemibiotrophs compared with biotrophs and necrotrophs.

It is important to note that no prior studies have been found that specifically measure the CAI for P. digitatum, Lehtinen et al.35. The research conducted in this study represents the first evaluation of this parameter for the P. digitatum fungus. The lowest value observed for this index was 1.73E10, the highest value was 2.08E11, and the average composite invasion index was 6.38E10.

In a previous study by Lehtinen et al.35, aggressiveness tests using the CAI index were conducted on Phytophthora infestans isolates in potato fields across Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. The study revealed differences in aggressiveness among the isolates from the different countries, although these differences were not considered significant from an epidemiological perspective. The most significant variations were observed in the LP (ranging from 89 to 185 h), SC (ranging from 100 to 1297 sporangia), and growth rate (ranging from close to zero to 6 mm day-1).

Considering P. digitatum as a necrotrophic lesion pathogen, its high sporulation capacity is noteworthy. Research by Smilanick et al.36 and more recently by Palou et al.37, indicates that post-harvest rot incidence, predominantly caused by Penicillium spp., is more prevalent in areas with heavy rainfall. These fungi are so important as they reproduce rapidly, and their spores are ubiquitous34. The SC index can be considered a crucial factor in assessing the invasiveness and harmfulness of this pathogen. The CAI exhibited a high level of diversity among the tested isolates in this research, although this diversity did not show significant variation among the geographical areas studied, suggesting a genetic basis for the observed diversity38,39.

Overall, the findings of this research demonstrate the high aggressiveness of P. digitatum, as all isolates were able to cause disease. The examination of various indices, including the percentage of green mold disease, fungal sporulation index, lesion percentage index, incubation period index, and latent period index, along with their direct and indirect relationships with the composite aggressiveness index, provide valuable insights into the aggressiveness and pathogenicity of P. digitatum. These investigations can contribute to epidemiological studies and the management of green mold disease in citrus fruits post-harvest2,40.

Material suplementario
Información adicional

redalyc-journal-id: 3613

Cited literature
1. Crops and livestock products [Internet]. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2023. [cited March 5, 2023]. Retrieved from: https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/TCL
2. Cheng Y, Lin Y, Cao H, Li Z. Citrus postharvest green mold: recent advances in fungal pathogenicity and fruit resistance. Microorganisms 2020;8 (3):449. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8030449. PMID: 32209982; PMCID: PMC7143998.
3. Hadian S, Supronienė S, Kulaitienė J, Hasanzadeh N. Effect of epiphytic bacteria from citrus against green mold post-harvest diseases of citrus. Horticulturae 2023;9(7):764. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9070764
4. Costa JH, Bazioli JM, de-Moraes-Pontes JG, Fill TP. Penicillium digitatum infection mechanisms in citrus: What do we know so far? Fungal Biol 2019;123(8):584-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2019.05.004. PMID: 31345412.
5. Rovetto EI, La-Spada F, Aloi F, Riolo M, Pane A, Garbelotto M, et al. Green solutions and new technologies for sustainable management of fungus and oomycete diseases in the citrus fruit supply chain. J Plant Pathol 2024;106(2):411-37. DOI: https://doi:10.1007/s42161-023-01543-6
6. Droby S, Cohen L, Rafael G, Wisniewski M, Macarisin D. The biochemical basis of pathogenicity and host‑specificity of Penicillium digitatum on citrus. Acta Hortic 2010;(877):229-36. DOI: https://doi:10.17660/ActaHortic.2010.877.229
7. Kanetis L, Förster H, Adaskaveg JE. Baseline sensitivities for new postharvest fungicides against Penicillium spp. on citrus and multiple resistance evaluations in P. digitatum. Plant Dis 2008;92(2): 301-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-2-0301. PMID: 30769382.
8. Ho WC, Ko WH. A simple method for obtaining single-spore isolates of fungi. Bot Bull Acad Sin 1997;38:41-4.
9. Zhang K, Yuan-Ying S, Cai L. An optimized protocol of single spore isolation for fungi. Cryptogam Mycol 2013;34(4):349-56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7872/crym.v34.iss4.2013.349
10. Pitt JI, Hocking AD. Penicillium and related genera. In: Pitt JI, Hocking AD, editors. Fungi and food spoilage. New York: Springer Boston; 2009. p. 169-273. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-92207-2_7
11. Desouki A, Ahmed Reda L, Rashed MA, Shehata ST. Morphological and molecular identification of Penicillium digitatum causing green mould of citrus fruits in Egypt Arab Univ J Agric Sci 2023;31 (2):281-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21608/ajs.2023.211771.1520
12. Wang W, de-Silva DD, Moslemi A, Edwards J, Ades PK, Crous PW, et al. Colletotrichum species causing anthracnose of citrus in Australia. J Fungi (Basel) 2021;7(1):47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jof7010047. PMID: 33445649; PMCID: PMC7828153.
13. González-Candelas L. An-omics insight into the pathogenicity of Penicillium digitatum: an overview. Acta Hortic 2013;1053:191-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2014.1053.20
14. Palou L. Penicillium digitatum, Penicillium italicum (green mold, blue mold). In: Bautista-Baños S, editor. Postharvest decay: Control strategies. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2014. p. 45-102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-411552-1.00002-8
15. Sánchez-Torres P, González-Candelas L, Ballester AR. Discovery and transcriptional profiling of Penicillium digitatum genes that could promote fungal virulence during citrus fruit infection. J Fungi (Basel) 2024;10(4):235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10040235. PMID: 38667906; PMCID: PMC11051341.
16. Filippov AV, Gurevich BI, Kozlovsky BE, Kuznetsova MA, Rogozhin AN, Spiglazova SY, et al. A rapid method for evaluation of partial potato resistance to late blight and of aggressiveness of Phytophthorainfestans isolates originating from different regions. Plant Breed & Seed Sci 2004; 50:29-41.
17. Raza W, Ghazanfar MU, Sullivan L, Cooke DE, Cooke LR. Mating type and aggressiveness of Phytophthora infestans (Mont.) de Bary in potato-growing areas of Punjab, Pakistan, 2017-2018 and identification of genotype 13_A2 in 2019-2020. Potato Res 2021;64(1):115-29. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11540-020-09467-9
18. Flier WG, Turkensteen LJ. Foliar aggressiveness of Phytophthora infestans in three potato growing regions in the Netherlands. Eur J Plant Pathol 1999;105(4):381-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008737222830
19. Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D. Model-based cluster analysis for structured data. In: Everitt BS, Landau S, Leese M, Stahl D, editors. Cluster Analysis. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2011. p. 187-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470977811.ch7
20. Yang Q, Qian X, Dhanasekaran S, Boateng NAS, Yan X, Zhu H, et al. Study on the infection mechanism of Penicillium Digitatum on postharvest citrus (Citrus Reticulata Blanco) based on transcriptomics. Microorganisms 2019;7(12):672. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7120672. PMID: 31835573; PMCID: PMC6956011.
21. Louw JP, Korsten L. Pathogenicity and host susceptibility of Penicillium spp. on citrus. Plant Dis 2015;99(1):21-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-02-14-0122-RE. PMID: 30699736.
22. Neri F, Donati I, Veronesi F, Mazzoni D, Mari M. Evaluation of Penicillium expansum isolates for aggressiveness, growth and patulin accumulation in usual and less common fruit hosts. Int J Food Microbiol 2010;143(3):109-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2010.08.002. PMID: 20800918.
23. Louw JP, Korsten L. Pathogenic Penicillium spp. on apple and pear. Plant Dis 2014;98(5):590-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-07-13-0710-RE. PMID: 30708549.
24. Smilanick JL, Sorenson D. Control of postharvest decay of citrus fruit with calcium polysulfide. Postharvest Biol Technol 2001;21(2):157-68. DOI : https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-5214(00)00142-3
25. Holmes GJ, Eckert JW. Sensitivity of Penicillium digitatum and P. italicum to postharvest citrus fungicides in California. Phytopathology 1999;89(9): 716-21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.9.716. PMID: 18944698.
26. Qian X, Yang Q, Zhang Q, Abdelhai MH, Dhanasekaran S, Serwah BNA, et al. Elucidation of the initial growth process and the infection mechanism of Penicillium digitatum on postharvest citrus (Citrus reticulata Blanco). Microorganisms 2019;7(11):485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms7110485. PMID: 31652932; PMCID: PMC6920975.
27. Nava I, Gaime‐Perraud I, Huerta‐Ochoa S, Favela‐Torres E, Saucedo‐Castañeda G. Penicillium commune spore production in solid‐state fermentation of coffee pulp at laboratory scale and in a helical ribbons rotating reactor. J Chem Technol Biot 2006;81(11):1760-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.1599
28. Du Y, Zhu J, Tian Z, Long C. PdStuA is a key transcription factor controlling sporulation, hydrophobicity, and stress tolerance in Penicillium digitatum. J Fungi 2023;9(9):941. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jof9090941
29. Lahlali R, Serrhini MN, Friel D, Jijakli MH. In vitro effects of water activity, temperature and solutes on the growth rate of P. italicum Wehmer and P. digitatum Sacc. J Appl Microbiol 2006; 101(3):628-36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2006.02953.x. Erratum in: J Appl Microbiol 2006; 101(5): 1198. PMID: 16907813.
30. Lehman JS, Shaner G. Selection of populations of Puccinia recondita f. sp. tritici for shortened latent period on a partially resistant wheat cultivar. Phytopathology 1997;87(2):170-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO.1997.87.2.170. PMID: 18945138.
31. Pringle A, Taylor J. The fitness of filamentous fungi. Trends Microbiol 2002;10(10):474-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0966-842x(02)02447-2. PMID: 12377558.
32. Milus EA, Seyran E, McNew R. Aggressiveness of Puccinia striiformis f. sp. tritici Isolates in the South-Central United States. Plant Dis 2006;90 (7):847-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PD-90-0847. PMID: 30781019.
33. Frenkel O, Brewer MT, Milgroom MG. Variation in pathogenicity and aggressiveness of Erysiphenecator from different Vitis spp. and geographic origins in the eastern United States. Phytopathology 2010;100(11):1185-93. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-01-10-0023. PMID: 20932167.
34. Précigout PA, Claessen D, Makowski D, Robert C. Does the latent period of leaf fungal pathogens reflect their trophic type? A meta-analysis of biotrophs, hemibiotrophs, and necrotrophs. Phytopathology 2020;110(2):345-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-04-19-0144-R. PMID: 31577162.
35. Lehtinen A, Andersson B, Le VH, Naerstad R, Rastas M, Ketoja E, et al. Aggressiveness of Phytophthorainfestans on detached potato leaflets in four Nordic countries. Plant Pathol 2009:58(4): 690-702. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3059.2009.02038.x
36. Smilanick JL, Mansour MF, Gabler FM, Goodwine WR. The effectiveness of pyrimethanil to inhibit germination of Penicillium digitatum and to control citrus green mold after harvest. Postharvest Biol Technol 2006;42(1):75-85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postharvbio.2006.05.008
37. Palou L, Smilanick JL, Droby S. Alternatives to conventional fungicides for the control of citrus postharvest green and blue moulds. Stewart Postharvest Review 2008;2(2):1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2212/spr.2008.2.2
38. Ismail M, Zhang J. Post-harvest citrus diseases and their control. Outlooks Pest Manag 2004;15 (1):29-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1564/15feb12
39. Levin E, Droby S, Wisniewski M, Dardick C. Role of effector proteins in the virulence of Penicilliumexpansum on apple fruit. In: Droby S, Gullino ML, Spadaro D, editors. Postharvest Pathology. Next Generation Solutions to Reducing Losses and Enhancing Safety. Switzerland: Springer Cham; 2021. p. 1-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56530-5_1
40. Ferreira FV, Bello F, Rivadeneira MF, Vázquez D, Musumeci MA. Biocontrol of Penicillium digitatum by native Bacillus and Pseudomonas strains isolated from orange peel. Biol Control 2023;186:105340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2023.105340
Notas
Notes
Source of funding: Own resources were used to implement the research.

_________

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare that this research was carried out at the Department of Agriculture, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran and presents no conflicts of interest.

__________

Acknowledgments: The authors sincerely thank Department of Agriculture, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran for their valuable support and provision of resources, which greatly contributed to the completion of this article.

________

Ethical considerations: This research is part of the Ph.D. dissertation of Ghorbanikhatir Ghasem and has been approved by Department of Agriculture, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran.

__________

Research limitations: The authors note that there were no limitations in the Present research work.

_________

Data availability: The data and materials used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

__________

Author Contributions: ll authors contributed to the conception, design, and writing of the manuscript. Ghorbanikhatir Ghasem conducted the experimental work and data analysis. Aghajani Mohammad Ali contributed to the interpretation of results and manuscript editing. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

_________

Publication permissions: This manuscript does not involve any studies with human participants or animals. All authors have reviewed the manuscript and consented to its submission and potential publication.

__________

Use of artificial intelligence in writing: Artificial intelligence tools (e.g., ChatGPT by OpenAI) were used to assist in language editing and improvement of grammar and clarity. All content has been reviewed and approved by the authors to ensure accuracy and originality.

___________

Image generation disclosure: No AI-generated images were used in this manuscript.

___________

Article ID: 189/JSARS/2025

___________

Editor's Note: Journal of the Selva Andina Research Society (JSARS) remains neutral with respect to jurisdictional claims published on maps and institutional affiliations, and all statements expressed in this article are those of the authors alone, and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, editors and reviewers. Any products that may be evaluated in this article or claims that may be made by their manufacturer are neither guaranteed nor endorsed by the publisher.
Notas de autor
* Contact address: Department of Agriculture, Gorgan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Gorgan, Iran. Phone: 00989111701576 Gorgan, Iran.

Ghorbani khatir Ghasem Aghajani Mohammad Ali E-mail address: maaghajanina@yahoo.com


Figure 1
Symptoms of green mold (Penicillium digitatum) infection on artificially inoculated oranges under controlled conditions

The figure shows widespread lesion development and sporulation on the fruit surface, the left panel seven days after inoculation, the right panel shows two weeks after inoculation. All isolates exhibited 100 % infection frequency, with varying levels of lesion expansion and sporulation density.

Table 1
Summary statistics


Figure 2
The average values of the CAI, SC, LP, IP, and LA indices were calculated for a total of 88 isolates of P. digitatum

Figure 3
Box and whisker plots illustrating the studied indicators

Figure 4
Correlation results
Table 2
ANOVA results of LA - SC-IP-LP-CAI (type III sums of squares)

Table 3
Regression results

Table 4
Classification of isolates based on the cluster test


Figure 5
Regression plot between the CAI and LA (A), SC index (B), IP index (C) and LP (D)

Figure 6
The residuals plot for the LA index (A), SC (B), IP (C), and LP (D)

Figure 7
Classification of isolates based on the cluster test
Table 5
Membership of 88 isolates of Penicillium digitatum under different cluster

Buscar:
Contexto
Descargar
Todas
Imágenes
Visor de artículos científicos generados a partir de XML-JATS por Redalyc