ARTÍCULOS DE REVISIÓN

HEAVY METALS CONTAMINATION IN THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL: EVEN LIMITED DATA REFLECTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM ANTHROPOGENIC ACTIVITY

CONTAMINACIÓN POR METALES PESADOS EN EL GOLFO DE GUAYAQUIL: INCLUSO DATOS LIMITADOS REFLEJAN IMPACTOS AMBIENTALESDE LAS ACTIVIDADES ANTRÓPICAS

Gabriela NAVARRETE-FORERO
Centro del Agua y Desarrollo Sustentable, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador
Lady MORALES BAREN
Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador
Luis DOMINGUEZ-GRANDA
Centro del Agua y Desarrollo Sustentable, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Matemáticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador
José PONTÓN CEVALLOS
Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral, Ecuador
José R. MARÍN JARRÍN
Humboldt State University, Estados Unidos

HEAVY METALS CONTAMINATION IN THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL: EVEN LIMITED DATA REFLECTS ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS FROM ANTHROPOGENIC ACTIVITY

Revista Internacional de Contaminación Ambiental, vol. 35, núm. 3, pp. 731-755, 2019

Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Recepción: 01 Enero 2018

Aprobación: 01 Septiembre 2018

Abstract: The Gulf of Guayaquil, the largest estuary on the Pacific coast of South America, provides livelihoods for fishing communities that supply seafood to national markets. Activities like mining and agriculture are major sources of contamination in the estuary, yet their effects on the ecosystem have not been determined. Publicly-available data were compiled to provide an overview of the level of contamination in water, sediment and seafood in this system. Measured concentrations (Cm) were compared with their corresponding permitted levels (Csl) defined in international regulations. Comparison outcomes were classified using a traffic-light color scale: green for ideal conditions (Cm < Csl × 10–1), yellow for alert situations that require precautionary measures (Csl × 10–1 ≤ Cm ≤ Csl × 10), or red for dangerous situations that must be remediated (Cm > Csl × 10). A total of 24 studies were found. Cadmium, mercury and lead were the most commonly analyzed elements. Water samples showed the highest percentage of dangerous levels (> 70 % for Cd, > 80 % for Hg). Extreme concentrations of Hg (1000 times > Csl) were reported for clams (Anadara spp.) and crabs (Ucides occidentalis) collected in the southern zone impacted by gold mining. Studies evidenced the limited use of quality assurance and control procedures on the data-gathering process, resulting in uncertainty. By using orders of magnitude to assess contamination levels, the effects of low precision in the pattern of contamination were reduced. This contribution intends to inform stakeholders about the implications for public health.

Keywords: cadmium, mercury, lead, mangrove, tropical eastern Pacific.

Resumen: El golfo de Guayaquil, el mayor estuario de la costa Pacífica sudamericana, provee sustento para comunidades pesqueras artesanales que surten el mercado nacional. Actividades como la minería y la agricultura son fuentes de contaminación del estua­rio, pero sus efectos en el ecosistema no han sido monitoreados. Se recopilaron datos públicos para mostrar el nivel de contaminación del agua, sedimentos y mariscos del sistema. Las concentraciones medidas (Cm) se compararon con sus correspondientes niveles permisibles (Csl) definidos en regulaciones internacionales. Los resultados fue­ron clasificados usando una escala de color de tipo semáforo: verde para condiciones ideales (Cm < Csl × 10–1), amarillo para situaciones de alerta (Csl × 10–1 ≤ Cm ≤ Csl × 10), o rojo para situaciones peligrosas que deben ser remediadas (Cm > Csl × 10). Se encontraron 24 estudios, principalmente sobre cadmio, mercurio y plomo. Los estudios de agua mostraron el mayor porcentaje de muestras en niveles peligrosos (Cd > 70 % y Hg > 80 %). Concentraciones extremas de mercurio (1000 veces > Csl) se reportaron en almejas (Anadaraspp.) y cangrejos (Ucides occidentalis) recolectados en un sector impactado por la minería de oro. Los estudios ponen en evidencia un limitado uso de procedimientos para asegurar y controlar la calidad durante la recolección de datos, lo cual resulta en incertidumbre. Usando órdenes de magnitud para evaluar los niveles de contaminación, se redujeron los efectos de la imprecisión en el patrón de contaminación. Esta contribución busca informar a los encargados de la toma de decisiones sobre las implicaciones en salud pública.

Palabras clave: cadmio, mercurio, plomo, manglar, Pacífico tropical oriental.

INTRODUCTION

Heavy metals are broadly defined, high-density chemical elements that occur naturally in the envi­ronment in low concentration levels (Calamari and Naeve 1994). They are relevant for coastal manage­ment and public health because of their increased levels in the environment due to human activities, and represent highly harmful pollutants (Han et al. 2000).

Heavy metals are released from land-based an­thropogenic and natural sources; discharged through river runoffs, drainage and atmospheric deposition; and finally collected into receiving systems, such as estuaries and mangroves (Amirah et al. 2013). Coastal mangroves provide regulating ecosystem services, like waste decomposition, detoxification and retention because their sediments act as a chelat­ing matrix for metals (Amaro-Pinheiro et al. 2012).

Thus, mangroves reduce the mobilization of metals to plant tissues and dependent trophic webs. However, mangrove deforestation is reducing this capacity, potentially allowing previously trapped metals to disperse and enter adjacent ecosystems (Sandilyan and Kathiresan 2014). For this reason, the accumulation of heavy metals in mangroves has become a worldwide threat (NOAA 1990, Macfarlane et al. 2007, Lewis et al. 2011).

Some aquatic organisms living in mangrove eco­systems tend to accumulate heavy metals that may relate to several public health effects. Animals that live in close association with sediments, in which they bury and feed, seem to be more exposed to these contaminants than other organisms (Storelli 2008).

Crabs have been extensively used for the study of heavy metals bioaccumulation because they feed mainly on litter, promote organic matter incorpora­tion to sediments, display slow growth rates and long life cycles, and are abundant and easy to collect (Amaro-Pinheiro et al. 2012). These popular seafood items represent a pathway for heavy metal transfer to human populations (Chien et al. 2002, Martí-Cid et al. 2007, Chen et al. 2008, Dórea 2008).

Documented toxicity mechanisms of heavy met­als in humans are related to enzymes of cellular respiration and central nervous system control of respiratory movements, among others (Marques et al. 2010). Effects include reduced central nervous system functioning, lower energy levels, damage to blood composition, lungs, kidneys, liver, and other organs (Amirah et al. 2013).

Long-term exposure to heavy metals may result in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases, muscular dystrophy, multiple sclerosis, and several types of cancer (Han et al. 2000, Amirah et al. 2013). Heavy metals are considered among the most concerning causes of major foodborne diseases (WHO 2015).

Fish consumption has increased worldwide in the last five decades, as it represents an excellent source of nutrients (FAO 2016). In Ecuador, annual fish consumption is 5-10 kg/person, the average for developing countries, and seafood is mainly provided by artisanal sector (FAO 2003, 2016).

The Ecuadorian government has recognized the negative impact of contamination on fisheries, and among its national policies is the prevention, control and mitigation of contamination in maritime areas and coastal zones (STM 2015). However, Ecuador does not conduct continuous monitoring of water quality (CPPS 2012, MAE 2014, Nolivos et al. 2015). In this review, the available information of heavy metal contamination in the main estuary of the country is synthesized, focusing on artisanal fisheries products.

Study area

The Gulf of Guayaquil (GG) is the largest estua­rine ecosystem on the Pacific coast of South America. Its surface area is estimated to cover 13 711 km2 (Fig. 1) and its depth varies between 20 and 180 m. It receives water from 24 out of the 79 drainage basins in the country, resulting in an annual average flow of 1654.5 m3/s. The catchment covers 53 299 km2 and includes 12 of the 24 provinces in the country (Montaño-Armijos and Sanfeliu-Montolío 2008).

Study area. Location of the Gulf of Guayaquil in South America, and main sites mentioned in the text. Rivers: (Daule, (2) Vinces, (3) Babahoyo, (4) Guayas
Fig. 1
Study area. Location of the Gulf of Guayaquil in South America, and main sites mentioned in the text. Rivers: (Daule, (2) Vinces, (3) Babahoyo, (4) Guayas

Economic activities across the GG’s watershed include agriculture, cattle raising, artisanal fish­ing, aquaculture, tourism, mining, manufacturing, navigation and urban development. Crops like rice, sugar cane, corn, banana, oil palm, cacao and coffee represent the main agricultural products of the region (Montaño-Armijos and Sanfeliu-Montolío 2008).

The GG’s influence area includes the city of Guayaquil, the largest in Ecuador, with more than 2.3 million inhabitants (INEC 2010). It is the main port city and a hub for economic, commercial and industrial activities.

Guayaquil is located on the banks of the Guayas river (Fig. 1), which is formed by the union of Daule, Vinces and Babahoyo rivers (Montaño-Armijos and Sanfeliu-Montolío 2008). The landscape around the Guayas river system is dominated by banana, rice, sugar cane, cacao, corn, passion fruit and soy fields, while shrimp ponds are abundant near the river mouth.

The GG accounts for 42 % of the Ecuadorian continental platform area and holds the largest fisher­ies production in the country (Montaño-Armijos and Sanfeliu-Montolío 2008, CPPS 2012). Official land­ings data, however, is only available for the red man­grove crab (Ucides occidentalis) and ark (Anadara spp., a bivalve), which are highly demanded seafood products. In 2011, more than 14 million crabs and 12 million black arks were landed in the GG (INP 2013).

Objectives

The GG is under strong pressure from human activities that have polluted its aquatic environment (CPPS 2012). Yet, this situation is not well repre­sented in international scientific literature.

Therefore, this systematic literature review in­tends to provide an overview of the current situation and identify major information gaps. It focuses on local studies about heavy metals concentrations in water, sediments and major artisanal seafood prod­ucts of the region.

The specific objetives of this contributions are to: (a) evaluate data quality to describe the robustness of available evidence, (b) assess the level of potential risk of heavy metal contamination, and (c) explore spatial patterns of heavy metal contamination across the region.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data collection

A search for empirical studies of heavy metal con­centrations in mangrove ecosystems of the GG was done. Public online catalogues, such as universities’ online repositories, research centers’ websites, and scientific (Scopus) and academic (Google Scholar) databases were consulted. Search keywords were: “contamination”, “heavy metals”, and “Gulf of Guayaquil”, in English and Spanish.

Search results were not filtered by year. Informa­tion about heavy metal accumulation in plants was not included, as it was out of the scope of this study. In cases where only an abstract was available online, libraries were visited in person to access full-text documents. If a study was available as a thesis and peer-reviewed article, both documents were consid­ered in the analysis.

Information retrieved from these documents includes: sampling location coordinates, sampling design description, lists of test materials and metals, analytical techniques, supplies and reagents used for preservation of samples and extraction of met­als, analytical quality assurance procedures (AQA) (Taverniers et al. 2004), reported indicators of data quality and heavy-metal concentration values.

Analytical quality assurance assessment

Information regarding AQA procedures and data quality indicators were used to assess the robustness of the available evidence for water, sediments and seafood metal contamination in the GG. Reported AQA practices were classified as being at the intra-, inter- or external-laboratory levels of quality control.

Use of certified reference material was interpreted as an accuracy indicator. Coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated for all studies as a common indicator of precision (Taverniers et al. 2004).

Qualitative diagnosis of contamination risk

A qualitative diagnosis of heavy metal contamina­tion levels in the GG was elaborated in three steps using quantitative indicators according to the fol­lowing steps:

1. The design of a classification system for contamina­tion levels consisted in adapting the “traffic-light” method (Baigún 2013), developed for artisanal fisheries management in the Paraná river basin in Argentina (Table I). Measured concentrations (Cm) were compared with their correspondent permitted levels (Csl) defined in international regulations, following EC (2016) for seafood, CCME (2014) for water and sediments, and USEPA (1980) for Pb in water. Qualitative indicators resembled the colors of a traffic-light, green for ideal conditions (Cm < Csl × 10–1), yellow for alert situations that require precautionary measures (Csl × 10–1 ≤ Cm ≤ Csl × 10), or red for dangerous situations that must be reverted (Cm > Csl × 10).

TABLE I
LEVELS OF POTENTIAL RISK BY HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION
TABLE I. LEVELS OF POTENTIAL RISK BY HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION
LevelLevel descriptionQuantitative definitionReference color
Ideal conditionsIdeal/desired conditions associated to practices that promote ecological integrity conservation and long-term fisheries sustainabilityHeavy-metal concentration below safety level’s order of magnitude. Cm < (Csl e × 10–1)Green
AlertSituations or practices that might threaten ecosystem functioning and fisheries status, and require precautionary measuresHeavy-metal concentration in the same order of magnitude as safety level. C m ≤ ( C s l × 1 0 ) a n d Cm ≥ (Csl × 10–1)Yellow
DangerDangerous or inviable situations or scenarios that must be reverted for they seriously compromise riverine ecosystem functioning, resources and fishing communitiesHeavy-metal concentration above safety level’s order of magnitude. Cm > (Csl × 10)Red
The framework is an adaptation of the “traffic-light” system described in Baigún (2013). Cm: measured concentration, Csl; safety level concentration

2. The classification system (Table I) was applied to available data (i.e., reported average concen­tration per sampling site, per study) for the most frequently analyzed elements, and obtained a matrix of samples versus test elements, containing traffic-light colors in each cell.

3. The geographic coordinates of sampling sites were added to the database to map results using the QGIS 2.8 application (QGIS Development Team 2015). Each element was represented in a separate point vector layer, with symbol color defined by cells’ values.

Spatial analysis

Boxplots were elaborated to show the variability of heavy metal concentrations in three sectors of the GG for available water, sediments and seafood data. Sectors were delimited around clusters of sampling sites.

All data available for each sector were included in the graph. (Geo-) statistical analyses were not conducted with data because of the large variation in sampling designs (spatio-temporal scales, focus spe­cies), which resulted in several confounding factors without the sufficient sample size to account for them. Therefore, results were interpreted qualitatively.

RESULTS

Twenty-four published studies performed be­tween 2010 and 2017 were found, of which only one (Fernández-Cadena et al. 2014) was indexed in the scientific database Scopus (Table II). No studies conducted prior to 2010 were found.

TABLE II
DETAILS OF THE METHODS USED TO MEASURE HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN ORGANISMS ACROSS THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL
DETAILS OF THE METHODS USED TO MEASURE HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN ORGANISMS ACROSS THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL
*Methods used to quantify the concentration of test elements present in test materials: AAS: atomic absorption spectrometry, CVAA: cold vapor, AAS, FAAS: flame AAS, GH-AAS; hydride generation AAS

Three types of materials were tested for con­taminants: water, sediments and seafood. The most common test elements were Pb (n = 117), Cd (n = 114) and Hg (n = 58), so our analyses focused on them. Seafood species represented in these studies comprised eight mollusks, two crustaceans and two fish species (Tables II and V).

Other test elements analyzed less frequently in studies included chromium (Cr), zinc (Zn), arsenic (As), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) and man­ganese (Mn), among others (Appendix II).

Summary of analytical methods

All studies found in this review used spectrometry methods to measure the concentrations of heavy met­als in samples (Tables II-IV). However, there were some differences among the methods used prior to the analysis. For instance, most studies focusing in or­ganisms analyzed what authors generally called “soft tissues”, and only one study (Feys-Espinoza 2013) was carried out using hard parts (crab exoskeleton).

The extraction of metals from organisms was done using HNO3 in all cases, but some authors added other acids in this process: Ortega-Pereira (2015) also used HClO4, while Ayala-Armijos et al. (2015) added H2SO4 for Hg measurements, and HCl for Cr, As and Pb.

Water samples were reportedly fixed with HNO3 in the field and transported in low temperature con­ditions to the lab in all cases (Table III). Water was filtered using papers of varied pore sizes, ranging from 0.2 to 8 μm, while this information was missing in half the studies.

TABLE III
DETAILS OF THE METHODS USED TO MEASURE HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN WATER SAMPLES ACROSS THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL
DETAILS OF THE METHODS USED TO MEASURE HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN WATER SAMPLES ACROSS THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL
*Methods used to quantify the concentration of test elements present in test materials: AAS: atomic absorption spectrometry, FAAS: flame atomic absorption spectrometry

**Pyrrolidine dithiocarbonate ammonium, ammonium acetate, and chloroform

The most common method to extract the metals from the sediments used pyrrolidine dithiocarbon­ate ammonium, ammonium acetate and chloroform (PDAAAC), but this information was often not explicit. The authors simply cited the “standard methods” guidelines (APHA 2005) in the methods’ section, leaving uncertainty about the exact proce­dures conducted in each case.

Finally, sediment samples were sieved to collect particles below 71 or 63 μm (Table IV). The ex­traction was done using HNO3 in all but two cases: Fernández-Cadena et al. (2014) used HNO3 and H2O2, and Rivera-Pizarro (2016) used HCl.

TABLE IV
DETAILS OF THE METHODS USED TO MEASURE HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES ACROSS THE GULF OF GUAYA­QUIL
DETAILS OF THE METHODS USED TO MEASURE HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATIONS IN SEDIMENT SAMPLES ACROSS THE GULF OF GUAYA­QUIL
*Methods used to quantify the concentration of test elements present in test materials: AAS: atomic absorption spectrometry, FAAS: flame AAS, GH-AAS: hydride generation AAS, ICP-MS: inductively coupled plasma mass spectropmetry

**This study also analized organisms (fish) but those data were not included in the present review because, according to the author, the specimens were bought on a nearby fish market, and thus lacked evidence of the geographic location where they were collected. Also, the species was not determined

Summary of analytical quality assurance proce­dures

Implicit references to AQA procedures in the meth­ods section were found in most (88 %) studies (Appen­dix I). References to methods used by other authors, and at least one intra-laboratory procedure were reported in 71 % of the studies found. Certified reference materials (mainly sediment) were reportedly used in 38 %.

Inter-laboratory AQA procedures or participatory proficiency testing schemes were not mentioned in any of the studies. The laboratories from Universidad de Guayaquil and Universidad Técnica de Machala togeth­er hosted 88 % of published studies, and both hold the certification ISO/IEC 17025 – general requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories.

Of the six (25 %) studies mentioning the ISO certification to support their data reliability, only two reported the use of reference materials, and none reported the resulting percentage of recovery.

Rapid risk assessment

Risk levels were assessed for Cd, Hg and Pb. Reported concentrations equal to or higher than the permitted levels were found in 53 % of samples for Cd, 27 % for Hg, and 33 % for Pb. Most samples were classified in the alert level (Fig. 2). Water analysis showed high percentages (> 70 %) of samples indicat­ing dangerous concentrations of Cd and Hg.

Percentages of samples with distinct levels of heavy metal contamination across the Gulf of Guayaquil. Original data were published between 2010 and 2016. Risk levels are relative to safe levels defined in international regulations
Fig. 2
Percentages of samples with distinct levels of heavy metal contamination across the Gulf of Guayaquil. Original data were published between 2010 and 2016. Risk levels are relative to safe levels defined in international regulations

In sediments, Cd and Pb ranged from ideal to alert conditions, while for Hg from alert to dangerous. In seafood, the three elements ranged from ideal to dangerous.

Spatial distribution of contaminants

Only one study (Proaño-Alvarado 2016) explicitly used a spatial analysis approach. It was conducted inside the Manglares Churute Reserve (a national marine protected area within the GG) and did not find significant differences in Cd, Cr or Pb concentrations among the four sampling stations established.

Most studies were conducted in the inner estuary, north of Puna island (Fig. 1). Three sectors were studied in more detail: Salado (n = 49), Churute (n = 32) and Jambeli (n = 28) (Figs. 3-5).

Cadmium contamination risk levels inferred from in local studies across the Gulf of Guayaquil. Dot colors represent the risk level as defined in the Methods' section: green is " ideal conditions"; yellow is "alert"; and red is "danger". Rectangles represent sector referred to in the text: (S) Salado, (C) Churete, (J) Jambeli
Fig. 3
Cadmium contamination risk levels inferred from in local studies across the Gulf of Guayaquil. Dot colors represent the risk level as defined in the Methods' section: green is " ideal conditions"; yellow is "alert"; and red is "danger". Rectangles represent sector referred to in the text: (S) Salado, (C) Churete, (J) Jambeli

Salado includes an estuarine branch that runs through the city of Guayaquil and the Manglares Estero Salado Reserve, south of the city. Churute (as defined in this study) includes Manglares Churute Reserve and nearby islands from the Guayas river estuary. The Jambeli archipelago is located south of Puna island.

Cadmium

Cd data was mainly available for Churute and Salado (Figs. 3 and 6a-c). In water, sediments, and organisms, Cd concentrations reached higher values in Churute than in Salado.

In Jambeli (only seafood data was available), Cd levels were similar to those found in Churute, and included the only Cd outlier: the oyster Crassostrea columbiensis with ten times the safe level of Cd for mollusks meat (location: Puerto Hualtaco) (Castro- Infante 2015).

Mercury

Hg data was the scarcest, and was not available for Churute (Figs. 4 and 6d-f). Concentration values covered large ranges, as reflected in the vertical-axis’ breaks in figure 6f in water, data was only available for Salado and all values were above the permitted level. In sediments, all values from Jambeli were above the permitted level, while all values from Salado were below.

Same as in figure 3, but for mercury
Fig. 4
Same as in figure 3, but for mercury

In seafood, Jambeli had the highest values, more than half of which passed the permitted level. Also in Jambeli, two studies (Tobar-Ordóñez 2013, Ayala- Armijos et al. 2015) found Hg concentrations > 200 times higher than the permitted level. The outlier in the seafood graph belongs to the black ark Anadara similis, with 618 ppm (location: Puerto Bolívar, Tobar-Ordóñez 2013). Organisms from Salado were represented by a single species (Callinectes arcuatus) and a single study (Franco-Solórzano 2015).

Lead

Pb data was mainly available for Churute and Salado (Figs. 5 and 6g-i). Again, vertical-axis breaks were needed to represent the large variability across the data. In water, most values were above the per­mitted level.

Same as in figure 3. but for lead
Fig. 5
Same as in figure 3. but for lead

Box plots showing the variability of concentrations of heavy metals found in water, sediment and seafood and sectors of Gulf of Guayaquil. Box plots represent median, 10th, 25th, 75th and 90th percentiles. Dashed lines represent the permitted levels as defined in international regulations. Boxplots C and I contain two dashed lines corresponding to the highest and lowest permitted levels for the species involved. Black dots represent outliers
Fig. 6
Box plots showing the variability of concentrations of heavy metals found in water, sediment and seafood and sectors of Gulf of Guayaquil. Box plots represent median, 10th, 25th, 75th and 90th percentiles. Dashed lines represent the permitted levels as defined in international regulations. Boxplots C and I contain two dashed lines corresponding to the highest and lowest permitted levels for the species involved. Black dots represent outliers

Two studies of water in the exact same sampling sites inside Salado found very different Pb concentra­tions: Kuffó-García (2013) found values three times the permitted level during the rainy season, while del Pezo-Quijije and Ruiz-Chiriguaya (2016) found values 200-1000 times the permitted level during the dry season.

Sediments from Salado showed higher concentra­tions and larger variability than from Churute, but both were below the permitted level.

In seafood, Jambeli showed the highest concentra­tions of Pb. Extreme concentrations were found in the crab Ucides occidentalis, in Churute and Jambeli, supported by only one study (Feys-Espinoza 2013). This study included the three outliers for seafood (> 30 ppm, Fig. 6i), plus one value from a different sec­tor (location: Puerto El Morro, Fig. 1, 44.19 ppm).

Other studies of Pb on this species (Siavichay- Lalangui 2013, Chuquimarca-Montesdeoca 2015) did not find such extreme values, but they worked with soft tissues (i.e., clam meat and hepatopancreas), while Feys-Espinoza (2013) analyzed exoskeletons.

DISCUSSION

Heavy metal contamination of the estuarine envi­ronment in the GG has proven to be a topic of interest at the local level. Environmental degradation of the system could lead to the loss of ecosystem services and threaten the health of people from nearby cities who consume seafood products harvested from the area.

Two patterns persisted in the analysis despite the variability in reported heavy metal concentrations. First, water was highly contaminated by the three focus elements (Cd, Hg, Pb) at the regional level. Second, extreme levels of seafood contamination were repeatedly found in samples from Jambelí, an estuarine area located at the outlet of a gold-mining dominated watershed.

The generalized alert signal indicates that the cur­rent practices are threatening artisanal fisheries and, in some cases, the danger signal demands immediate action to mitigate the current situation (Baigún 2013).

Influence of analytical methods on heavy metal concentration values

There were large variations among the heavy metal concentrations reported by different authors studying similar materials, which could be related with the methods used to extract the metals from the samples.

For instance, three authors measured heavy metal concentrations in “soft tissue” of the crab U. occiden­talis (Siavichay-Lalangui 2013, Ayala-Armijos et al. 2015, Chuquimarca-Montesdeoca 2015). All these authors used HNO3 to extract the metals, but only Ayala-Armijos et al. (2015) used additional acids in this process (Table II).

Interestingly, the Pb and Hg concentrations re­ported by Ayala-Armijos et al. (2015) are one and two orders of magnitude above the other two studies, respectively (Table V). The same happened in studies of the bivalve genus Anadara (A. tuberculosa and A. similis), where the only author that reported using additional acids during extraction (Tobar-Ordóñez 2013) obtained values far above those found by authors using HNO3 alone (Ordóñez-Lucin 2015, Carrasco-Peña and Webster-Coello 2016).

TABLE V
HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION RANGES IN SEAFOOD ORGANISMS COLLECTED IN THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL
HEAVY METAL CONCENTRATION RANGES IN SEAFOOD ORGANISMS COLLECTED IN THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL
*Heavy metal concentration ranges in seafood organisms collected in the Gulf of Guayaquil, regulated by the European Commission (2016). BDL: below detection level, EU: European Commission. Figures in bold: samples exceeding the EC limits. Empty cells indicate that the metal was not tested. Scientific names follow WoRMS Editorial Board (2016)

Thus, it is possible that many values presented in this study are underestimations of the actual con­centrations. However, even studies that did not use additional acids during extraction reported values above those required by the European Commission (EC 2016).

Moreover, studies that used additional acida and found extreme levels (Tobar-Ordóñez 2013, Ayala- Armijos et al. 2015) were both located in the southern sector of the Jambeli archipelago (Fig. 1), raising the question of whether the extreme values are due to the analytical methods, the influence of goldmining, or a combination of both. Therefore, the present literature review suggests that the variability in methods used could have influenced the quantitative values, but overall, there is a high heavy metal contamination in the Gulf of Guayaquil.

Dealing with uncertainty in a precautionary ap­proach

Uncertainty is part of environmental decision-making (Kriebel et al. 2001). As is common in research projects conducted in tropical environments, most local information is written in the native language (Spanish), produced by academic institutions, and not published in peer-review journals (Corlett 2011).

Evidence of known accuracy (i.e., supported by certified reference materials) indicates metal contamination in the fishes Diapterus peruvianus and Sardinops sagax (Ortega-Pereira 2015), arks Anadara tuberculosa and A. similis (Tobar-Ordóñez 2013) and sediments from Estero Salado (Fernández- Cadena et al. 2014).

Sediment samples had the relatively largest amount of data supported through AQA procedures. The rest of the data had unknown accuracy, but often known precision. Since most samples were analyzed in ISO/IEC-17025 certified laboratories, the question of whether reference materials were not used, or not reported by authors, remains.

Insufficient descriptions of analytical quality as­surance have been reported by Lewis et al. (2011) in a global review of contamination by anthropogenic chemicals in mangroves, and the GG is not the excep­tion. Implementation of quality assurance and control procedures and improvement of reporting practices in academic theses are needed in further studies to enhance confidence on metal concentrations docu­mented for the GG.

One way to deal with uncertainty is to look for preponderant evidence rather than details (Kriebel et al. 2001). Therefore, a flexible rule was used to define potential risk levels, and the “alert” signal was recurrent. This conclusion is confirmed by pub­lished international classifications (NOAA 1990), because the concentration ranges found in the GG fall in different categories of contamination/pollu­tion (Table VI).

TABLE VI
EXAMPLES OF CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION PUB-LISHED BY NOAA (1990)
TABLE VI. EXAMPLES OF CLASSIFICATION SCHEMES OF HEAVY METAL CONTAMINATION PUB­LISHED BY NOAA (1990)
Classification schemesConcentration (ppm)
CdHgPb
Rotterdam Harbor sediment quality1
1. Slightly contaminated< 6*< 1.5*< 460*
2. Moderately contaminated6-9*1.5-9*110-460
3. Contaminated9-32*9-16460-660
4. Heavily contaminated> 32> 16> 660
Great Lakes harbors2
Non-polluted6< 1 *< 40*
Moderately polluted--40-60*
Heavily polluted-> 1*> 60*
Ranges in the GG (this study)BDL- 16.93BDL- 7.61BDL- 78
1 Jansen (1987) cited in Long and Morgan (1990); 2 Bahnick et al. (1984) cited in Long and Morgan (1990) *Levels of contamination in sediments found in the Gulf of Guayaquil, BDL: below detection level

Unless actions are taken to control and limit the sources of contamination, heavy metal accumulation will continue.

Potential threats to public health

Seafood consumption has been identified as the major pathway of human exposure to heavy metals, especially when it represents a large percentage of food intake in a population (Storelli et al. 2005, Martí- Cid et al. 2007, Zheng et al. 2007). Cd, Hg and Pb are produced by different economic activities taking place in GG the basin (Table VII); they are known as non-essential metals, with no demonstrated biologi­cal requirement in humans and have the potential to seriously harm human health (Goyer 1997).

TABLE VII
BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT HEAVY METALS FOUND IN THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL*
TABLE VII. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ABOUT HEAVY METALS FOUND IN THE GULF OF GUAYAQUIL*
Heavy metal sourcesPotential effects on human healthReferences
Cadmium (Cd)
- Soils, rocks, coal and mineral fertilizers - Batteries, pigments, metal coatings, plastics - Electroplating- Cancer - Lung damage in smokers - Stomach irritation - Kidney disease - Fragile bonesSuwazono et al. (2006), Bernard (2008), Martin and Griswold (2009), Lane et al. (2015)
Mercury (Hg)
- Chlorine gas and caustic soda production - Thermometers, dental fillings, switches, light bulbs, batteries - Coal-burning power plants, biocides, pesticides and household antiseptics - Gold, mercury, aluminum, copper mining - Cement production- Immune system suppression - Neurodevelopmental problems in prenatal and postnatal periods - Cardiovascular, lung, kidney problems in adults - DNA damage and mitosis impairmentTchounwou et al. (2003), Castilhos et al. (2006), Mozaffarian and Rimm (2006), Bebianno et al. (2007), Dórea (2008), Feng et al. (2008), Holmes et al. (2009), Martin and Griswold (2009), Selin et al. (2010), Li et al. (2014), Antoszczyszyn and Michalska (2016), Salazar-Camacho et al. (2017)
Lead (Pb)
- Fossil fuel burning - Mining - Manufacturing - Battery production - Ammunition - Metal products like solder and pipes - X-ray shielding devices- Cancer - Weakness in fingers, wrists or ankles - Increased blood pressure, anemia - Nervous system malfunctioning - Kidney damage - Miscarriage in pregnant women; damage to reproductive organs in menMartin and Griswold (2009), Almeida et al. (2013), Turner and Solman (2016), Rosen et al. (2017)
*Summary of sources and effects of heavy metals on human health reported in scientific literature

Seafood consumption has benefits and draw­backs. Fish and shellfish are known for supplying important nutrients associated with a decreased risk for cardiovascular disease (Han et al. 2000, Storelli 2008). Even though thousands of American children are born each year with blood methylmercury levels exceeding the EPA reference dose, evidence shows that benefits of modest fish consumption (1-2 serv­ings per week) outweigh the risks of toxicity by heavy metals (Mozaffarian and Rimm 2006, Chen et al. 2008, Selin et al. 2010, FAO 2016).

Avoidance of fish consumption in a population caused by misleading information may result in excess coronary heart disease deaths and subop­timal neurodevelopment in children (Mozaffarian and Rimm 2006). Thus, the message of this review should not be confused with an advice against sea­food consumption, rather, a call for precaution among consumers, and an alert signal for decision makers to focus on the causes of the problem.

Emergent spatial patterns

The spatial information presented in this review (Figs. 3-4) reveals that research efforts have fo­cused on a few sectors of the estuary, leaving large portions of the GG unexplored in terms of heavy metal contamination. Similar patterns of heavy metal contamination in water were found across the three identified sectors.

The influence of agriculture, through the use of fertilizers and pesticides, is reflected in the Daule river’s contamination (Huayamave 2013). However, watershed contaminants are likely to be accumulated in downstream deposition areas (Mackey and Hodg­kinson 1995). This is the case of Churute, a protected area located downstream the Guayas river system and used by more than 1400 artisanal fishermen and crab collectors (El Telégrafo 2017), which shows high levels of Cd.

Another recurrent result was the contamination of seafood from Jambeli. This sector is also less studied in terms of water and sediments contamination. Seafood from Jambeli had the highest levels of the three heavy metals focused on in this review. Of these, Hg repre­sents the contaminant of most concern. Jambeli is in El Oro province, where small-scale mining is abundant.

This is the most likely source of Hg contamination, as it is used to recover gold from mines through a process of amalgamation (IIED 2001, CPPS 2012).

CONCLUSIONS AND FURTHER RESEARCH

This review is the first peer-reviewed, comprehen­sive study focusing on heavy metal contamination in the GG. Robust studies included here (Tobar-Ordóñez 2013, Fernández-Cadena et al. 2014, Ortega-Pereira 2015) confirm the general estimations of contamina­tion.

Samples from different sectors of the GG often contain Cd, Hg and Pb concentrations above the international permitted levels, including those found in seafood products. These are non-essential toxic elements that can cause severe health problems to consumers, depending on the level of exposure.

Further research in heavy metal contamination in the region should address topics such as the concen­tration in traditional seafood products, consumers’ behavior, and levels of exposure among the local population. For instance, crab and black ark collectors spend extended periods in contact with mangrove muds, and anecdotal information indicates they may suffer more health issues than fishermen using boats (Almeida and Kan 2016).

Limited information and uncertainty of available data about metal concentration in the estuary cur­rently allows only a qualitative assessment of the situation. Local researchers have made important contributions through field and laboratory studies, but large information gaps and uncertainty persist. These gaps undermine the promotion of science-based decision-making and systematic conservation planning for the GG.

Collaborative inter-institutional studies could help address these gaps and benefit local laboratories, if performed as part of participatory proficiency testing schemes (Taverniers et al. 2004). Moreover, much of this uncertainty could be eliminated through the adoption of standardized procedures for the testing of environmental contaminant levels.

Finally, regional studies are urgently needed to provide valuable information about spatial trends of metal contamination in the GG, their relation to industry, and their effects on local communities. This in the economy of a developing country (such as mining), the negative spillovers in local communi­ties become more relevant than the social benefits they provide.

These externalities are not only associated with the increase of contamination and its effect in human health and the environment, but also with the up­surge of disputes and violent confrontations between residents and industry representatives (Bebbington et al. 2008).

As a response, the alert signal from the GG de­mands not only a better management of wastewaters at the catchment level (i.e., agricultural, industrial, urban, mining), but the active involvement of stake­holders and decision makers at different levels of governance, in order to combat the causes of this­contamination.

Appendix I
Studies of heavy metal concentrations and their corresponding analyticial quality control procedures*
Studies of heavy metal concentrations and their corresponding analyticial quality control procedures*
*References on analytical quality assurance procedures. Studies assessed heavy metal concentrations in water, sediments and seafood from the Gulf of Guayaquil. Definitions follow Taverniers et al. (2004).Methods used to quantify the concentration of test elements present in test materials were: AAS: atomic absorption spectrometry, CVAA: cold vapor AAS, FAAS: flame AAS, GH-AAS: hydride generation AAS **Material of known purity used alongside with the samples to validate the analytical method. Once analyzed, a percentage of recovery is calculated to represent the efficiency of the method in extracting the test element from the test material. NA = Not available ***Other method performance parameters: BS: blank samples, CC: calibration curve, LOD: limit of detection, LOL: limit of linearity, LOQ: limit of quantification, R: replicates

Appendix II
Concentration ranges in organic and inorganic materials for trace elements not regulated by the European Commission (2016)*
Concentration ranges in organic and inorganic materials for trace elements not regulated by the European Commission (2016)*
*Organisms collected in the Gulf of Guayaquil. Scientific names follow WoRMS Editorial Board (2016) **Other trace elements measured in sediments by Fernández-Cadena et al. (2014) in ppm: Li: 0.00785-0.0014, Be: 0.00021-0.00124, Al: 31.1545-74.2199, V: 0.09682-0.15988, Fe: 16.4711- 45.4231, Se: 0.00212-0.0348, Mo: 0.00213-0.00565, Ag: 0.00078-0.00149, Sn: 0.00121-0.00326 BDL: below detection level

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Froilán D. Heras and Mercy Borbor for assistance in accessing in-room available theses from Universidad Técnica de Machala, and Evan Duggan and Michelle Schuite­man for reviewing earlier drafts. Gabriela Navarrete Forero's stay at Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral was supported by the German Agency for International Cooperation (GIZ) through the Centre for International Migration and Development, as part of the Returning Experts Program.

REFERENCES

Alcívar-Tenorio M. and Mosquera-Armijo J. (2011). Concentración de metales pesados (Cr total, Pb, Cd) en agua superficial y sedimentos en el Estero Salado (Guayaquil). B.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Natu­rales, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 71 pp.

Almeida A. and Kan L. (2016). Vulnerabilidade sócio am­biental de pescadores e marisqueiras em S. Francisco do Conde/Ba. Fronteiras 5 (2), 29-46. DOI: 10.21664/2238-8869.2016v5i2.p29-46

Amaro-Pinheiro M.A., Grandara-e-Silva P.P., Almeida- Duarte L.F., Almeida A.A. and Pinheiro-Zanotto F. (2012). Accumulation of six metals in the mangrove crab Ucides cordatus (Crustacea: Ucididae) and its food source, the red mangrove Rhizophora mangle (Angiosperma: Rhizophoraceae). Ecotox. Environ. Safe. 81, 114-121. DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2012.05.004

Amirah M.N., Afiza A.S., Faizal W.I.W., Nurliyana M.H. and Laili S. (2013). Human health risk assessment of metal contamination through consumption of fish. Journal of Environment Pollution and Human Health 1 (1), 1-5. DOI: 10.12691/jephh-1-1-1

Antoszczyszyn T. and Michalska A. (2016). The poten­tial risk of environmental contamination by mercury contained in Polish coal mining waste. Journal of Sustainable Mining 15, 191-196. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsm.2017.04.002

APHA (2005). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21st ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC, USA, 541 pp.

Ayala-Armijos H., Pérez-Rodríguez J., Quezada-Abad C., Silva-Ochoa A. and Cortez-Suárez L. (2015). Cuantificación de metales pesados (Hg, As, Pb y Cr) en organismos acuáticos: cangrejo rojo (Ucides oc­cidentalis). Revista Ciencia UNEMI 8 (16), 54-60.

Baigún C.R.M. (2013). Manual para la gestión ambiental de la pesca artesanal y las buenas prácticas pesqueras en la cuenca del río Paraná, Argentina. Fundación Humedales/Wetlands International, Buenos Aires, Argentina, 94 pp.

Banguera-Rodríguez F.A. (2013). Cuantificación de cad­mio, plomo y níquel en agua superficial, sedimento y organismo (Mytella guyanensis) en los puentes Portete y 5 de Junio del Estero Salado (Guayaquil). B.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 57 pp.

Bebbington A., Hinojosa L., Bebbington D.H., Burneo M.L. and Warnaars X. (2008). Contention and ambigu­ity: Mining and the possibilities of development. Dev. Change. 39 (6), 887-914. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00517.x

Bebianno M.J., Santos C., Canário J., Gouveia N., Sena- Carvalho D. and Vale C. (2007). Hg and metallothio­nein-like proteins in the black scabbardfish Aphanopus carbo. Food. Chem. Toxicol. 45 (8), 1443-1452. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.02.003

Bernard A. (2008). Cadmium and its adverse effects on human health. Indian J. Med. Res. 128 (Oct), 557-564.

Calamari D. and Naeve H. (Eds.). (1994). Review of pollution in the African aquatic environment. CIFA Technical Paper No. 25 [online]. http://www.fao.org/docrep/008/v3640e/V3640E04.htm 25/09/2017.

Carpio-Rivera N.Y. (2016). Cuantificación de cadmio (Cd) y plomo (Pb) en agua, sedimento y plantas en el río Chimbo del cantón Marcelino Mariduela, Prov. Guayas. M.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Natura­les, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 125 pp.

Carrasco-Peña R. and Webster-Coello R. (2016). Capaci­dad bioacumuladora de metales pesados en moluscos bivalvos de los esteros del cantón Balao. Departamento de Posgrados, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador, 33 pp.

Castilhos Z.C., Rodrigues-Filho S., Rodrigues A.P.C., Vil­las-Bôas R.C., Siegel S., Veiga M.M. and Beinhoff,C. (2006). Mercury contamination in fish from gold min­ing areas in Indonesia and human health risk assess­ment. Sci. Total Environ. 368, 320-325. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.01.039

Castro-Infante K.E. (2015). Determinación de la con­centración de metales pesados (Hg, Pb, Cd) en la ostra (Crassostrea columbiensis) utilizada como biosensor en cuatro localidades de la zona cos­tera de la provincia de El Oro, 2014. B.Sc. Thesis. Unidad Académica de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Machala, Machala, Ecuador, 69 pp.

CCME (2014). Canadian environmental quality guide­lines. Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environ­ment [online]. http://ceqg-rcqe.ccme.ca/en/index.html#void 16/06/2017.

Chen C.Y., Serell N., Evers D.C., Fleishman B.J., Lam­bert K.F., Weiss J. Mason R.P. and Bank M.S. (2008). Meeting report: Methylmercury in marine ecosystems – from sources to seafood consumers. Environ. Health Perspect. 116 (12), 1706-1712. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.11211

Chien L.C., Hung T.C., Choang K.Y., Yeh C.Y., Meng P.J., Shieh M.J. and Han B.C. (2002). Running energetics of the North American river otter: Do short legs neces­sarily reduce efficiency on land? Sci. Total Environ. 285 (1), 177-185. DOI: 10.1016/S1095-6433(02)00136-8

Chuquimarca-Montesdeoca L.A. (2015). Contenido de metales pesados (Hg, Pb, Cd), en el tejido blando del quelípedo y hepatopáncreas del cangrejo rojo (Ucides occidentalis), en tres localidades del perfil costero de la provincia de El Oro, 2014. B.Sc. Thesis. Unidad Académica de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Machala, Machala, Ecuador, 54 pp.

Corlett R.T. (2011). Trouble with the gray literature. Bio­tropica 43 (1), 3-5.

CPPS (2012). Estado de la contaminación marina en Ecua­dor. Reporte final. Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur, Plan de Acción del Pacífico Sudeste, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 141 pp.

Del Pezo-Quijije S.A. and Ruiz-Chiriguaya M.N. (2016). Evaluación de la contaminación físico-química y microbiológica de las aguas del Estero Salado, Ciud­adela Universitaria de la ciudad de Guayaquil. B.Sc. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 99 pp.

Dórea J.G. (2008). Persistent, bioaccumulative and toxic substances in fish: Human health considerations. Sci. Total Environ. 400 (1-3), 93-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.06.017

EC (2016). European Commission regulation No. 1881/2006 of 19 December 2006 setting maximum levels for certain contaminants in foodstuffs. Con­solidated version 01/04/2016 [online]. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:02006R1881-20160401 25/04/2017

El Telégrafo (2017). Cangrejeros de Churute se benefi­cian con el Instructivo de pesca artesanal. Diario El Telégrafo [online]. https://www.eltelegrafo.com.ec/noticias/88/8/cangrejeros-de-churute-se-benefician-con-el-instructivo-de-pesca-artesanal 02/02/2017.

FAO (2003). Resumen informativo sobre la pesca por países. La República del Ecuador. Food and Agri­culture Organization of the United Nations [online]. http://www.fao.org/fi/oldsite/FCP/es/ecu/profile.htm 09/25/2017.

FAO (2016). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Report. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy, 200 pp.

Feng X., Li P., Qiu G., Wang S., Li G., Shang L., Meng B., Jiang H., Bai W., Li Z. and Fu X. (2008). Human exposure to methylmercury through rice intake in mer­cury mining areas, Guizhou province, China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 326-332. DOI: 10.1021/es071948x

Fernández-Cadena J.C., Andrade S., Silva-Coello C.L. and De La Iglesia R. (2014). Heavy metal concentration in mangrove surface sediments from the north-west coast of South America. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 82, 221-226. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.016.

Feys-Espinoza J. (2013). Niveles de cadmio y plomo en el exoesqueleto del cangrejo rojo (Ucides occidentalis) del Golfo de Guayaquil (Las Loras – Puerto El Morro – Chupadores) y Machala (Puerto Bolívar). B.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 59 pp.

Franco-Solórzano J.G. (2015). Determinación de niveles de mercurio, cadmio, níquel, cromo y plomo en tejido blando, hepatopáncreas en la jaiba azul (Callinectes arcuatus) y sedimento en los ramales del Estero Salado. B.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 32 pp.

Goyer R.A. (1997). Toxic and essential metal interactions. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 17, 37-50. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.nutr.17.1.37

Han B.C., Jeng W.L., Hung T.C., Ling Y.C., Shieh M. and Chien L.C. (2000). Estimation of metal and organo­chlorine pesticide exposures and potential health threat by consumption of oysters in Taiwan. Environ. Pollut. 109, 147-156. DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(99)00236-5

Holmes P., James K.A.F. and Levy L.S. (2009). Is low-level environmental mercury exposure of concern to human health? Sci. Total Environ. 408, 171-182. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.09.043

Huayamave J. (2013). Estudio de las aguas y sedimento del río Daule, en la Provincia del Guayas, desde el punto de vista físico químico, orgánico, bacteriológico y toxicológico. Ph.D. Thesis. Departamento de Ingeni­ería de Procesos, Universidad de Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España, 322 pp.

IIED (2001). Small-scale mining in Ecuador. mining, minerals and sustainable development. October 2001, No. 75. Report. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, England, 28 pp.

INEC (2010). Población y demografía. Resultados censo de población 2010. Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos [online]. http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/censo-de-poblacion-y-vivienda/ 24/04/2017.

INP (2013). Desembarques estimados de cangrejo rojo de manglar (Ucides occidentalis), en varios puertos y organizaciones del Golfo de Guayaquil. Report. Instituto Nacional de Pesca, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 5 pp.

Jiménez-Verdesoto D.B. (2012). Cuantificación de metales pesados (cadmio, cromo, níquel y plomo) en agua superficial, sedimentos y organismos (Crassostrea columbiensis) ostión de mangle en el puente Portete del Estero Salado (Guayaquil). B.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 44 pp.

Jiménez-Verdesoto D.B. (2017). Determinación de plomo y cadmio en sedimentos y organismos (peces com­ercializados) en el Puente Portete del Estero Salado (Guayaquil) y su impacto generado. M.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 80 pp.

Kriebel D., Tickner J., Epstein P., Lemons J., Levins R., Loechler E.L., Quinn M., Rudel R., Schettler T. and Stoto M. (2001). The precautionary principle in envi­ronmental science. Environ. Health Perspect. 109 (9), 871-876. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109871

Kuffó-García A.C. (2013). Niveles de cadmio, cromo, plomo, y su bioacumulación por Mytella strigata de­limitando la zona urbano-marginal en el Estero Salado de Guayaquil. M.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 111 pp.

Lane E.A., Canty M.J. and More S.J. (2015). Cadmium exposure and consequence for the health and pro­ductivity of farmed ruminants. Res. Vet. Sci. 101, 132-139. DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2015.06.004

Lewis M., Pryor R. and Wilking L. (2011). Fate and effects of anthropogenic chemicals in mangrove ecosystems: A review. Environ. Pollut. 159, 2328-2364. DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2011.04.027

Li Z., Ma Z., van der Kuijp T.J., Yuan Z. and Huang L. (2014). A review of soil heavy metal pollution from mines in China: Pollution and health risk assessment. Sci. Total Environ. 468-469, 843-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.08.090

Long E. and Morgan L.G. (1990). The potential for biological effects of the national status and trends program. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS OMA 52. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, USA, 235 pp.

Macfarlane G.R., Koller C.E. and Blomberg S.P. (2007). Accumulation and partitioning of heavy metals in mangroves: A synthesis of field-based studies. Che­mosphere 69, 1454-1464. DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.04.059

Mackey A.P. and Hodgkinson M.C. (1995). Concentrations and spatial distribution of trace metals in mangrove sediments from the Brisbane River, Australia. Environ. Pollut. 90 (2), 181-186. DOI: 10.1016/0269-7491(94)00106-N

MAE (2014). Mapa interactivo ambiental. Ministerio de Ambiente de Ecuador [online]. http://mapainteractivo.ambiente.gob.ec/ 28/09/2017

Marques A., Nunes M.L., Moore S.K. and Strom M.S. (2010). Climate change and seafood safety: Human health implications. Food Res. Int. 43, 1766-1779. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.02.010

Martí-Cid R., Bocio A., Llobet J.M. and Domingo J.L. (2007). Intake of chemical contaminants through fish and seafood consumption by children of Catalonia, Spain: Health risks. Food. Chem. Toxicol. 45 (10), 1968-1974. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.04.014

Martin S. and Griswold W. (2009). Human health effects of heavy metals. Environmental Science Technology Brief for Citizens 15 (Mar), 1-6.

Mero-Valarezo M. (2010). Determinación de metales pesados (Cd y Pb) en moluscos bivalvos de interés comercial de cuatro esteros del Golfo de Guayaquil. M.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Uni­versidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 76 pp.

Montaño-Armijos M.D.J. and Sanfeliu-Montolío T. (2008). Ecosistema Guayas (Ecuador): Medio am­biente y sostenibilidad. Revista Tecnológica ESPOL 21 (1), 1-6.

Mozaffarian D. and Rimm E.B. (2006). Fish intake, con­taminants, and human health: Evaluating the risks and the benefits. JAMA, 296 (15), 1885-1899. DOI: 10.1001/jama.296.15.1885

NOAA (1990). The potential for biological effects of sediment-sorbed contaminants tested in the National Status and Trends Program. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration. Technical memoran­dum. Seattle, USA, 244 pp.

Nolivos I., Villacís M., Vázquez R.F., Mora D.E., Domínguez-Granda L. Hampel H. and Velarde E. (2015). Challenges for a sustainable management of Ecuadorian water resources. Sustainability of Water Quality and Ecology 6, 101-106. DOI: 10.1016/j.swaqe.2015.02.002

Ordóñez-Lucin M.C. (2015). Bioacumulación de metales pesados (Pb, Hg, Cd) en el bivalvo Anadara tuberculosa en cuatro localidades (Bajo Alto, Estero Huayla, Puerto Hualtaco y Archipiélago de Jambelí) de la región costera de la provincia de El Oro, 2014. B.Sc. Thesis. Unidad Académica de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Uni­versidad Técnica de Machala, Machala, Ecuador, 66 pp.

Ortega-Pereira C.L. (2015). Cuantificación de las concen­traciones de metales pesados (Hg, Cu, Ni, Zn, Cd, Pb y Mn) por espectrometría de absorción atómica en peces del estero Huaylá (Diapterus peruvians . Sardinops sagax), Puerto Bolívar, cantón Machala, provincia de El Oro, 2014. B.Sc. Thesis. Unidad Académica de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Machala, Machala, Ecuador, 63 pp.

Proaño-Alvarado M.C. (2016). Análisis espacial de con­centraciones de metales pesados en agua y sedimentos de la Reserva Ecológica Manglares de Churute. M.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 72 pp.

QGIS Development Team (2015). QGIS geographic in­formation system. Open source geospatial foundation project [online]. http://qgis.osgeo.org 05/05/2017.

Ramírez-Prado N.G. (2016). Determinación de cadmio en los ríos Guayas, Daule y Babahoyo mediante el estudio de concentraciones en agua, sedimento y en el caracol manzana Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck, 1822) (Caenogastropoda: Ampullariidae). B.Sc. The­sis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 106 pp.

Ramírez-Prado N., Pernía B., Mero M., Larreta E., Noboa- Cárdenas A., Ramírez-Moreira L., López D., Zambra­no J., Muñoz J., Bravo K., Baquerizo M., Benavides A. and Castro R. (2016). Pomacea canaliculata (Lamarck , 1828) as bioindicator of the presence of cadmium in the rivers Guayas, Daule and Babahoyo. Rev. Cient. Cien. Nat. Ambien. 10 (June), 19-28.

Rivera-Pizarro V.H. (2016). Estudio de las concentraciones por metales pesados e hidrocarburos en el ramal B del Estero Salado. M.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ingeniería Química, Universidad de Guayaquil, Guayaquil, Ec­uador, 69 pp.

Rosen M.B., Pokhrel L.R. and Weir M.H. (2017). A discussion about public health, lead and Legionella pneumophila in drinking water supplies in the United States. Sci. Total Environ. Jul 15, 590-591:843-852. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.164

Salazar-Camacho C., Salas-Moreno M., Marrugo-Madrid S., Marrugo-Negrete J. and Díez S. (2017). Dietary hu­man exposure to mercury in two artisanal small-scale gold mining communities of northwestern Colombia. Eviron. Int. 107, 47-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2017.06.011

Sandilyan S. and Kathiresan K. (2014). Decline of man­groves – A threat of heavy metal poisoning in Asia. Ocean Coast. Manag. 102 (Part A), 161-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2014.09.025

STM (2015). Plan nacional de investigación marina. Sec­retaría Técnica del Mar. Report. Quito, Ecuador, 72 pp.

Selin N.E., Sunderland E.M., Knightes C.D. and Mason R.P. (2010). Sources of mercury exposure for U.S. seafood consumers: Implications for policy. Environ. Health Perspect. 118 (1), 137-143. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.0900811

Siavichay-Lalangui B.R. (2013). Determinación de cad­mio y plomo en el tejido blando, hepatopáncreas del cangrejo rojo (Ucides occidentalis) y sedimento de la Reserva Ecológica Manglares Churute. B.Sc. Thesis. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad de Guaya­quil, Guayaquil, Ecuador, 46 pp.

Storelli M.M., Storelli A. and Marcotrigiano G.O. (2005). Accumulation of mercury, cadmium, lead and arsenic in sword fish and blue fin tuna from the Mediterranean Sea: A comparative study. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 50 (9), 1004-1007. DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.041

Storelli M.M. (2008). Potential human health risks from metals (Hg, Cd, and Pb) and polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) via seafood consumption: Estimation of target hazard quotients (THQs) and toxic equivalents (TEQs). Food Chem. Toxicol. 46 (8), 2782-2788. DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2008.05.011

Suwazono Y., Sand S., Vahter M., Filipsson A.F., Skerfv­ing S., Lidfeldt J. and Åkesson A. (2006). Benchmark dose for cadmium-induced renal effects in humans. Environ. Health Persp. 114 (7), 1072-1076. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9028

Tchounwou P.B., Ayensu W.K., Ninashvili N. and Sutton D. (2003). Environmental exposure to mercury and its toxicopathologic implications for public health. Envi­ron. Toxicol. 18 (3), 149-175. DOI: 10.1002/tox.10116

Taverniers I., de Loose M. and van Bockstaele E. (2004). Trends in quality in the analytical laboratory. II. Analytical method validation and quality assurance. Trac-Trend. Anal. Chem. 23 (8), 535-552. DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2004.04.001

Tobar-Ordóñez J.A. (2013). Determinación de metales pesados en moluscos bivalvos (Anadara tuberculosa . A. similis) del estero Huaylá de Puerto Bolívar, por espectrofotometría de absorción atómica 2013. B.Sc. Thesis. Unidad Académica de Ciencias Químicas y de la Salud, Universidad Técnica de Machala, Machala, Ecuador, 85 pp.

Turner A. and Solman K.R. (2016). Lead in exterior paints from the urban and suburban environs of Plymouth, south west England. Sci. Total Environ. 547, 132-136. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.125

USEPA (1980). National recommended water quality criteria – aquatic life criteria table: Lead. United States Environmental Protection Agency [online]. https://www.epa.gov/wqc/national-recommended-water-quality-criteria-aquatic-life-criteria-table 19/09/2017.

WHO (2015). Food safety. Fact sheet No. 399. World Health Organization Media Centre [online]. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs399/en/ 25/09/2017

WoRMS Editorial Board (2016). World Register of Marine Species [online]. DOI: 10.14284/170 19/09/2017.

Zheng N., Wang Q., Zhang X., Zheng D., Zhang Z. and Zhang S. (2007). Population health risk due to dietary intake of heavy metals in the industrial area of Huludao city, China. Sci. Total Environ. 387, 96-104. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2007.07.044

Notas de autor

gnavarr@espol.edu.ec

HTML generado a partir de XML-JATS4R por