﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.0 20120330//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.0/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.0" specific-use="sps-1.8" xml:lang="en" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
	<front>
		<journal-meta>
			<journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">rica</journal-id>
			<journal-title-group>
				<journal-title>Revista internacional de contaminación ambiental</journal-title>
				<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">Rev. Int. Contam.
					Ambient</abbrev-journal-title>
			</journal-title-group>
			<issn pub-type="ppub">0188-4999</issn>
			<publisher>
				<publisher-name>Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Centro de Ciencias de la Atmósfera</publisher-name>
			</publisher>
		</journal-meta>
		<article-meta>
			<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.20937/RICA.53519</article-id>
			<article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">00011</article-id>
			<article-categories>
				<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
					<subject>Artículos</subject>
				</subj-group>
			</article-categories>
			<title-group>
				<article-title>COMPOSTING SUGAR CANE BAGASSE AT FULL SCALE: ORGANIC MATTER DECAY
					KINETICS, METAGENOMICS AND PLANT-GROWTH PROMOTING BACTERIA
					CAPABILITIES</article-title>
				<trans-title-group xml:lang="es">
					<trans-title>COMPOSTAJE DE BAGAZO DE CAÑA DE AZÚCAR A ESCALA COMERCIAL: CINÉTICA
						DE DECAIMIENTO DE MATERIA ORGÁNICA, METAGENÓMICA Y CAPACIDADES BACTERIANAS
						PARA LA PROMOCIÓN DEL CRECIMIENTO DE PLANTAS</trans-title>
				</trans-title-group>
			</title-group>
			<contrib-group>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Velázquez Fernández</surname>
						<given-names>Jesús Bernardino</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1b"><sup>1</sup></xref>
					<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="c1">*</xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Hernández-Rosales</surname>
						<given-names>Irma Paz</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"><sup>2</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
				<contrib contrib-type="author">
					<name>
						<surname>Contreras Ramos</surname>
						<given-names>Silvia Maribel</given-names>
					</name>
					<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"><sup>1</sup></xref>
				</contrib>
			</contrib-group>
			<aff id="aff1">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en
					Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C. Avenida Normalistas 800, CP
					44270, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México</institution>
					<institution content-type="normalized">Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en
					Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C.</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en
					Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C.</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Guadalajara</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="state">Jalisco</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">México</country>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff1b">
				<label>1</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en
					Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C. Avenida Normalistas 800, CP
					44270, Guadalajara, Jalisco, México</institution>
					<institution content-type="normalized">Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en
					Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C.</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Centro de Investigación y Asistencia en
					Tecnología y Diseño del Estado de Jalisco A.C.</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Guadalajara</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="state">Jalisco</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">México</country>
				<email>jesusbvf@gmail.com</email>
			</aff>
			<aff id="aff2">
				<label>2</label>
				<institution content-type="original">Unidad Académica de Ciencias Básicas e
					Ingenierías, Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit. Ciudad de la Cultura Amado Nervo,
					CP 63155, Tepic, Nayarit, México</institution>
				<institution content-type="normalized">Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgdiv1">Unidad Académica de Ciencias Básicas e
					Ingenierías</institution>
				<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit</institution>
				<addr-line>
					<named-content content-type="city">Tepic</named-content>
            <named-content content-type="state">Nayarit</named-content>
				</addr-line>
				<country country="MX">Mexico</country>
			</aff>
			<author-notes>
				<corresp id="c1">
					<label>*</label>Corresponding author: <email>jesusbvf@gmail.com</email>
				</corresp>
			</author-notes>
			<!--<pub-date date-type="pub" publication-format="electronic">
				<day>04</day>
				<month>05</month>
				<year>2021</year>
			</pub-date>
			<pub-date date-type="collection" publication-format="electronic">-->
				<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
				<month>05</month>
				<year>2020</year>
			</pub-date>
			<volume>36</volume>
			<issue>2</issue>
			<fpage>361</fpage>
			<lpage>370</lpage>
			<history>
				<date date-type="received">
					<day>01</day>
					<month>01</month>
					<year>2019</year>
				</date>
				<date date-type="accepted">
					<day>01</day>
					<month>07</month>
					<year>2019</year>
				</date>
			</history>
			<permissions>
				<license license-type="open-access"
					xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/" xml:lang="en">
					<license-p>This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the
						Creative Commons Attribution License</license-p>
				</license>
			</permissions>
			<abstract>
				<title>ABSTRACT</title>
				<p>The management difficulties implied at field-scale composting make difficult to
					perform kinetic studies, leading to a gap in the literature at real enterprise
					conditions. Although composting has been reported to show a three-phase kinetics
					regarding the temperature, for organic matter, an exponential decay kinetics has
					been described. Organic matter decay, internal temperature of sugar-cane bagasse
					compost windrows along the time at enterprise (field-scale) level and the
					microbial community of the final product were analyzed. Final compost was
					achieved at 12-17 weeks with 41-47 % humidity and 31-47 % organic matter
					content. Kinetics model of organic matter biodegradation showed R<sup>2</sup> ≥
					0.6 and no differences between exponential or linear model R<sup>2</sup> were
					observed. Linear biodegradation constant was 2.5 % of organic matter loss/week,
					ranging from 2.2 to 3.7 %/week. The most abundant bacterial classes were
						<italic>Bacilli</italic> and <italic>Anaerolineae</italic> from metagenomic
					analysis. Bacterial cultures isolated showed plant-growth promoting and aromatic
					degradation capabilities. This shed light to future prospection studies on
					real-world composting for enterprises and scientists. </p>
			</abstract>
			<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
				<title>RESUMEN</title>
				<p>Las dificultades de manejo del compostaje a escala comercial o de campo
					dificultan el desarrollo de estudios cinéticos, lo que ha llevado a una ausencia
					de información en la literatura en las condiciones reales comerciales. Aunque se
					ha reportado que el compostaje tiene tres fases según la temperatura y la
					materia orgánica, se ha descrito que sigue una cinética de decaimiento
					exponencial. En el presente trabajo se analizaron la disminunición de materia
					orgánica y la temperatura interna y externa de filas de composta de bagazo de
					caña a lo largo del tiempo a nivel comercial (escala de campo) y metagenómica
					del producto final. La composta final se alcanzó a las 12-17 semanas con 41-47 %
					de humedad y 31-47 % de materia orgánica. El modelo cinético de degradación
					mostró una R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.6 y no se observaron diferencias entre el ajuste al
					modelo exponencial y el lineal. La constante de degradación lineal fue de 2.5 %
					materia orgánica/semana, en un rango entre 2.2 y 3.7 %/semana. Las clases
					bacterianas más abundantes de los análisis metagenómicos del producto final
					fueron <italic>Bacilli</italic> y <italic>Anaerolineae</italic>. Los aislados
					bacterianos cultivados mostraron capacidad de promoción de crecimiento de
					plantas y degradación de aromáticos. Esto aporta conocimiento para futuros
					estudios de prospección para cientìficos y empresas que realicen compostaje a
					nivel comercial. </p>
			</trans-abstract>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
				<title>Key words:</title>
				<kwd>compost</kwd>
				<kwd>biodegradability</kwd>
				<kwd>microbiome</kwd>
				<kwd>biofertilizer</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
				<title>Palabras clave:</title>
				<kwd>composta</kwd>
				<kwd>biodegradabilidad</kwd>
				<kwd>microbioma</kwd>
				<kwd>biofertilizante</kwd>
			</kwd-group>
			<counts>
				<fig-count count="5"/>
				<table-count count="3"/>
				<equation-count count="3"/>
				<ref-count count="16"/>
				<page-count count="10"/>
			</counts>
		</article-meta>
	</front>
	<body>
		<sec sec-type="intro">
			<title>INTRODUCTION</title>
			<p>Sugarcane bagasse is the agricultural waste generated in the largest amount for sugar
				production in Latin America. Because composting makes possible to biodegrade organic
				matter like bagasse, manure and other waste, the United States Environmental
				Protection Agency (USEPA) has recommended its use for contaminant biodegradation
					(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">EPA 1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B8"
					>EPA 2016</xref>). The final product, the compost, can be used as a fertilizer
				and to bioremediate soil, air and water, or to control soil erosion (<xref
					ref-type="bibr" rid="B4">EPA 1997a</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B5">EPA
					1997b</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B6">2006</xref>).</p>
			<p>Three temperature phases have been described during composting (<xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="B3">EPA 1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Xu and Li
				2017</xref>). The first phase consists of an increase of temperature up to 50 ºC or
				higher. Once reached the higher temperature, the second phase or thermophilic begins
				as long as those temperatures are kept. The third phase consists of a decrease of
				the temperature as the compost reaches its maturity. </p>
			<p>The increase and hold at high temperature (50 ºC and higher) during the first and
				second phases is caused by the metabolic activity of the microbiota, which uses the
				organic matter as energy source and would help kill pathogens (<xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="B8">EPA 2016</xref>). Thus, heterotrophic microorganisms are the majority
				in this phase. </p>
			<p>As the organic matter decreases (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">EPA 1998</xref>), the
				percentage of biodegradable organic matter depends on the input material.
				Biodegradable content is 60-90 % in normal waste. When the waste is contaminated
				with organic compounds, that percentage might vary. For instance, agave bagasse
				could be around 88 % (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Rodríguez et al. 2013</xref>),
				for biosolid wastes 70 %, and for leguminous or rumen residues, 80-85 % has been
				reported (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arango-Osorno et al. 2016</xref>). The
				final compost commonly has 30-50 % of organic matter (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3"
					>EPA 1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Rodríguez et al. 2013</xref>,
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arango-Osorno et al. 2016</xref>). </p>
			<p>The time needed to reach the mature compost is highly variable. Normally, it takes 8
				to 26 weeks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">EPA 1998</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr"
					rid="B1">Arango-Osorno et al. 2016</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B15">Xu
					2018</xref>). Such broad range is due to the variability in environmental
				conditions, management of organic matter, starting microbiota, and even the scale:
				laboratory, pilot or field scale have shown different results and times for
				composting (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">EPA 1998</xref>).</p>
			<p>At laboratory scale, usually starts with 1 ton or less of input material, most cases
				work at kg scale, and in reactors with hundreds of kg. At pilot scale, composting is
				usually carried out at facilities or open sky. Feedstock is disposed in piles and
				the amount is at higher level of magnitude: tenths or hundreds of tons,
				approximately 10 to 20 cubic meters (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">EPA
				1998</xref>). At field scale or full level (commercial) in Latin America, normally,
				composting is at open sky in fields disposed for that purpose and material to be
				composted is distributed in several windrows, which are large rows of piles. Each
				windrow involves several hundreds or thousands of tons of starting material,
				depending of the length of the windrow, but the windrow/pile width could be similar
				to that in pilot scale (approx. 2-3 m, which allows similar aeration). Because of
				the large size, pile management is difficult at pilot scale, so in order to keep
				humidity, also large equipment is required. In other words, the management could be
				different from those at lower scales and the temperature and humidity could not be
				controlled similarly. Also, there is another remarkable difference between pilot and
				full scale: an entire windrow is not deposited at the same time (day, for instance),
				i.e., it is formed as the feedstock is brought to the field at a variable rate.
				Keeping this in mind, when the compost is mixed, it could be scrambled with an
				adjacent pile (within the same windrow) which could have been deposited 1-3 days
				before or after. Thus, it is logic to think that it will be a large variability in
				physical and chemical parameters. Consequently, the microbiota composition and
				metabolism in field scale composting could be altered, and the composting phases
				(according to temperature or organic matter decay) may not be as expected for
				smaller scales. This is why, scarce literature exists on composting at
				field/commercial level in Latin America.</p>
			<p>The organic matter decay has been described to follow an exponential or first order
				kinetics (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">EPA 1998</xref>) implying that the first
				phase has a larger degradation rate than the second one. Although, some authors
				suggest that it could be linear or even follow other mathematical models, as
				reported in laboratory scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Roncevic et al.
					2005</xref>). As far as we know, no report is found about the kinetics of
				organic matter decay at a field scale and the possible biological implications of
				the final microbiota product. The present work aims to investigate what model fits
				best for degradation kinetics in open field composting, and to study the microbiota
				composition, its plant growth promoting, and degradation properties of the final
				compost. </p>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
			<title>MATERIAL AND METHODS</title>
			<p>The work was carried out at field-scale from bagasse waste on an open field
				(21º3’’38.5’’N 104º53’8.0’’W, 1040 masl, temperatures between 19 and 34 ºC along the
				year). The bagasse waste was mixed with other waste of sugar cane processing to
				obtain sugar, but the bagasse constitutes at least 80 % of the feedstock (initial
				organic carbon ranged from 29 to 84 % and humidity from 49 to 64 %) and the rest 20
				% is cane-sugar ash. The rows have 3 m width and a starting height of 2 m, thus, at
				the beginning every pile has around a hundred tons approximately. As the material
				was being deposited a pile after another, a windrow of 100 m long (3 m width
				approx.) is formed after 3-5 days (10-15 piles). Subsequent windrows were deposited
				3 m away from the previous one, so the equipment for mixing could enter between rows
				properly (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1</xref>). At the end, ten windrows
				were deposited in the field. Because the production of the feedstock is not
				perfectly constant, entire windrows were deposited at different intervals (<xref
					ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table I</xref>). </p>
			<p>
				<fig id="f1">
					<label>Fig. 1</label>
					<caption>
						<title>Picture (left) and scheme (right) of two compost windrows. A)
							Longitudinal view. Five piles from four different windrows. Piles from
							windrows 2 and 3 were behind the freshly disposed windrow (4) and show
							an orange coloration by fungi. B) Cross-sectional view from a row
							between two windrows. The right windrow was more recently deposited than
							the left one. Orange color in the left windrow is due to fungi</title>
					</caption>
					<graphic xlink:href="0188-4999-rica-36-02-361-gf1.png"/>
				</fig>
			</p>
			<p>
				<table-wrap id="t1">
					<label>TABLE I</label>
					<caption>
						<title>TIME AND CONDITIONS OF COMPOSTING AT FIELD-SCALE</title>
					</caption>
					<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
						<colgroup>
							<col/>
							<col span="5"/>
						</colgroup>
						<tbody>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify" rowspan="2"> </td>
								<td align="center" colspan="5">Site/windrow </td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="center">1</td>
								<td align="center">2</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
								<td align="center">4</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Time at which that windrow was started (days,
									from day 0)<sup>a</sup></td>
								<td align="center">0</td>
								<td align="center">12</td>
								<td align="center">22</td>
								<td align="center">35</td>
								<td align="center">50</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Maturation time (days)</td>
								<td align="center">120</td>
								<td align="center">122</td>
								<td align="center">112</td>
								<td align="center">85</td>
								<td align="center">-</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Organic matter at start (%)</td>
								<td align="center">74</td>
								<td align="center">75</td>
								<td align="center">72</td>
								<td align="center">81</td>
								<td align="center">84</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Organic matter at the end (%)</td>
								<td align="center">43</td>
								<td align="center">31</td>
								<td align="center">47</td>
								<td align="center">36</td>
								<td align="center">45</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Humidity at start (%)</td>
								<td align="center">61</td>
								<td align="center">64</td>
								<td align="center">64</td>
								<td align="center">69</td>
								<td align="center">73</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Humidity at the end (%)<sup>d</sup></td>
								<td align="center">41</td>
								<td align="center">45</td>
								<td align="center">47</td>
								<td align="center">41</td>
								<td align="center">47</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Number of samplings</td>
								<td align="center">5</td>
								<td align="center">6</td>
								<td align="center">7</td>
								<td align="center">6</td>
								<td align="center">3</td>
							</tr>
							<tr>
								<td align="justify">Biodegradation constant </td>
								<td align="center">-0.312</td>
								<td align="center">-0.403</td>
								<td align="center">-0.349</td>
								<td align="center">-0.527</td>
								<td align="center"><italic>nd</italic></td>
							</tr>
						</tbody>
					</table>
					<table-wrap-foot>
						<fn id="TFN1">
							<label><sup>a</sup></label>
							<p>It refers at the number of days passed after the first windrow was
								completed, nd = not determined.</p>
						</fn>
					</table-wrap-foot>
				</table-wrap>
			</p>
			<p>As the starting material is humid, during the first four weeks of composting, no
				extra water is added to the composting piles. Nevertheless, pile mixing was carried
				out by mechanic inversion once a week during the composting. During mixing, around
				800-1000 L of water/ton were added to keep the compost humid.</p>
			<sec>
				<title>Sampling</title>
				<p>Sampling and analysis were similar to that described by <xref ref-type="bibr"
						rid="B11">Rodríguez et al. (2013)</xref>. Each other windrow was selected to
					sample, thus, only five windrows were sampled at three points: two next to the
					edges and one in the middle. Approximately 1 kg sample was taken at 20 cm depth.
					The three samples from the same windrow were mixed and labeled. Sampling was
					approximately every 6-8 days. Every time a sample was taken, outer and inner
					temperature was measured: outer temperature was measured by placing a mercury
					thermometer on the windrow and the inner temperature by using a thermocouple
					probe omega HH100 1 m inside the pile at the sampling point.</p>
				<p>Sometimes, mixing or sampling was suspended because occasional rains, so the time
					interval for sampling was not homogeneous. Time zero was considered after the
					windrows were entirely deposited (so the first pile of that windrow could have
					been deposited 5 days or less before time zero).</p>
				<p>Organic matter and humidity were determined according with NOM-021-RECNAT-2000
						(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B13">SEMARNAT 2000</xref>). Samples were dried
					at 40 ºC to constant weight before analysis. Every analysis was carried out six
					times and only the mean is reported.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Bacterial community analysis</title>
				<p>Compost DNA was obtained by following procedure of MPBio FastDNA Spin kit for
					Soil ® on compost samples when no significant change in organic matter content
					was observed for two weeks, when maturity is considered to be reached.
					Metagenomic analysis was performed by NGS service at CIAD-Mazatlan
					(www.ciadmazatlan.com) service by using Illumina ® NGS miniSeq The methodology
					used was an analysis of the microbiota by massive sequencing of the 16S
					ribosomal gene with the primers V3-338f and V3-533r with Illumina adapters to
					amplify the V3 region only. Finally, the samples were sequenced on the Miniseq
					device of Illumina in standard conditions (300 cycles, 2X150). The 16S ribosomal
					RNA sequences obtained were verified for the quality, chimeras were eliminated,
					after pairing and singleton elimination, paired sequences were searched against
					SILVA high quality ribosomal RNA databases http://www.arb-silva.de.
					Subsequently, species with less than 1 % were grouped as “others” to have a
					clear view of the dominant bacteria species.</p>
				<p>Culturable bacteria were isolated by plating 50 μL of a compost suspension (1
					g/10 mL of sterile saline solution) on soy trypticasein agar. Twenty colonies
					were randomly taken and cultured in Luria-Bertani broth overnight previous to
					measure plant-growth promoting and C23O enzyme activities. Species from sixteen
					isolates were identified by using MALDI-TOF of Bruker ®.</p>
				<p>Phosphate solubilization was measured after placing 100 μL of overnight culture
					in 8 mL of phosphorite Pikovskaya broth (5.0 g/L phosphorite, 4 mg/L manganese
					sulfate, 2 mg/L ferrous sulfate, 0.2 g/L sodium chloride, 0.2 g/L potassium
					chloride, 0.5 g/L yeast extract, 0.3 g/L magnesium sulfate, 0.5 g/L ammonium
					sulfate, 10 g/L glucose). After 48 h incubation at 28 ºC, phosphate
					concentration in supernatant was measured by using Hanna kits. No inoculum was
					used as a control. Analysis were made by triplicate.</p>
				<p>Indolacetic acid (IAA) production was evaluated by Salkowski reaction. Tubes
					containing 800 μL of tryptone culture medium (5 g/L glucose, 1 g/L dibasic
					potassium phosphate, 0.4 g/L ammonium nitrate, 0.2 g/L sodium chloride, 0.4 g/L
					magnesium sulfate, 20 g/L tryptone) with or without 0.1 g/L tryptophan
					(intermediate for IAA production) were inoculated with 10 μL of overnight
					culture. After 48 h incubation at 28 ºC, cell pellets were resuspended with
					Salkowsky reagent (1 mL 0.5 M ferric chloride, 50 mL water and 30 mL
					concentrated sulfuric acid). Tubes were incubated at room temperature for 30
					min. Absorbance was measured at 530 nm. Concentration was calculated by
					interpolation within a calibration curve by IAA. Analyses were made by
					triplicate.</p>
				<p>Siderophore production was determined by chromeazurol S reaction with ferric ion
					in agar plates. Siderophore reaction agar was prepared by adding 10 mL of
					solution 1 (0.1 mM ferric chloride, 0.6 mg/mL chromeazurol S, 0.728 mg/mL
					hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide) to a mixture of 800 mL of solution 2 (37.8
					g/L PIPES, 0.375 g/L monobasic potassium phosphate, 0.625 g/L sodium chloride,
					1.25 g/L ammonium chloride, 2 % agar pH 6.8) with 70 mL of solution 3 (2.9 %
					glucose, 2.9 % mannitol, 0.7 % magnesium sulfate, 0.016 % calcium chloride,
					0.0017 % manganese sulfate, 0.002 % boric acid, 0.00006 % cupric sulfate, 0.0017
					% zinc sulfate, 0.0014 % sodium molybdate). After autoclaving, siderophore
					reaction agar was poured on Petri dishes: A color change to orange (from blue)
					indicates siderophore production. The diameter of the halo is an indirect
					measurement of the amount of produced siderophores. Analyses were made by
					triplicate.</p>
				<p>For C23O enzyme activity measurement, overnight cultures were resuspended in
					Davis minimum medium and incubated 24 h at 28 ºC. Bacterial pellets were
					resuspended in 1 mL of 40 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.5). Enzyme activity was
					measured spectrophotometrically by adding 50 μL of cell suspension on 1 mL of 40
					mM phosphate buffer containing 2.5 mM catechol. Molar absorptivity of the
					product 36 000/M/cm was used (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B9">Hupert-Kocurek et
						al. 2012</xref>). Activity was reported by μmoles of products/min/mg
					protein. Total protein was determined by Lowry method (<xref ref-type="bibr"
						rid="B10">Ramírez-Sandoval and Velázquez-Fernández 2013</xref>). Analyses
					were made by triplicate.</p>
				<p>Models and descriptive statistical analysis were carried out with Matlab
					R2017a.</p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="results|discussion">
			<title>RESULTS AND DISCUSSION</title>
			<p>The timing needed for pile production at field scale provokes that every windrow is
				generated at different times (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table I</xref>). In
				the present work, the windrow at site 5 was formed ca 50 days after the first
				windrow. Thus, every windrow was formed approximately every 5-7 days, since the site
				5 corresponds to the tenth windrow. Sampling was done weekly, but not every site
				could be sampled every time due to the difficulty of access when piles were being
				mixed. As a result, each site was sampled only 5-7 times, except for the site 5 (the
				last formed), which was sampled only 3 times. At the end, mature compost piles were
				1 m height, and texture was similar to humus. It took 4 to 5 months to reach that
				point, so the longest time reported was around 120 days or more (<xref
					ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table I</xref>). It took 85 to 122 days, i.e., 12 to
				17 weeks to reach mature compost (according to the absence of organic matter
				variation). This is similar to the time from a pilot-scale study with agave bagasse,
				previously reported by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Rodríguez et al.
					(2013)</xref>. This is interesting, since we could reach similar maturation
				times, regardless of the feedstock. Also, this time is within the interval suggested
				by <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">EPA (1998)</xref> for composting: 8 to 26 weeks,
				i.e., 56 to 182 days. In contrast, at laboratory scale, maturation could be reached
				in 60 days (8-9 weeks, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arango-Osorno et al.
					2016</xref>). Keeping this in mind, it suggests that the scale is even more
				important to be taken into account for time planning that the feedstock per se.</p>
			<p>The humidity at the beginning (after the windrow was entirely formed) ranges from 61
				to 73 %, while at the end was 41-47 % (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table
					I</xref>). Although the initial values are different from other studies due to
				the feedstock, final values are close to those reported in literature. For instance,
					<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Rodríguez et al. (2013)</xref> found final
				humidity of 50-60 % at pilot-scale, while <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1"
					>Arango-Osorno et al. (2016)</xref> reported values of 30-40 % at laboratory
				scale. A value of 40 % of humidity is considered the minimum to sustain the
				microbial activity for biodegradation, but values over 70 % could avoid proper
				aeration, inhibiting microbial growth and activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B2"
					>Bueno-Márquez et al. 2008</xref>). Because the initial values were over 61 %,
				no water was added to the composting windrows for the first four weeks. The
				concomitant high values of organic matter allowed fungi growth on the piles during
				the first month (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f1">Fig. 1</xref>). The growing fungus
				confers a white/orange color at the exterior of the pile, which is not observable
				when sampling the core of the pile. Despite that, using conventional microbiological
				methods, those fungi can be grown in the laboratory, but the microbial biodiversity
				is too high in richness, and abundance (data not shown). Since it was not the aim of
				this work, the microbial biodiversity is currently under study and will be published
				in the future.</p>
			<sec>
				<title>Changes in temperature</title>
				<p>Although the three thermal phases are to be expected during the composting:
					rising, thermophilic and lowering (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B3">EPA
						1998</xref>), several works have reported no significant changes at
					laboratory or pilot scales. For instance, at laboratory scale, <xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arango-Osorno et al. (2016)</xref> did not observe
					changes during the entire process, i.e., the temperature was in the mesophilic
					range during the entire composting process (20-30 ºC). Contrastingly, at pilot
					scale, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Rodríguez et al. (2013)</xref> found a
					higher temperature (45-70 ºC), but with no significant changes during the whole
					process. Similarly, in the present work, temperature ranged from 40 to 70 ºC,
					exception made of site 2 at 94 days, which was lower since it had been turned
					and watered just before sampling (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f2">Fig. 2</xref>).
					Thus, for sampling, no other windrow was sampled if it had been turned and
					watered in the same day or the previous to the sampling. This also suggests that
					the turning and water addition lower the compost temperature by 20 ºC. No rising
					phase could be detected, so, the temperature increases within the first five
					days, i.e., the time that takes to complete the pile.</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f2">
						<label>Fig. 2</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Inner temperature changes during cane bagasse composting at field
								scale. A) Values from each sampling site. B) Average values grouped
								within a week window. (Mean ± standard deviation is shown). Dotted
								line represents the minimum square linear regression</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="0188-4999-rica-36-02-361-gf2.png"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>The differences between the temperature ranges at laboratory scale and pilot or
					field scales could be explained in terms of the windrow/pile depth and surface.
					At laboratory scale, compost piles have generally no more than 0.5 m depth,
					while at pilot scale they are 1 m or even deeper. The depth at laboratory scale
					allows better pile aeration and heat exchange, since most laboratory compost
					containers have no more than 20 cm distance between the core and the surface. At
					field scales, we measured external temperature by placing a mercury thermometer
					on the surface of the pile, and when it was introduced 20 cm within the pile,
					the difference was negligible or less than 2 ºC. This finding and the behavior
					of humidity and organic matter suggest that pilot scale is closer to field scale
					composting than laboratory scale, regardless of the feedstock. As can be
					observed in <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3">figure 3</xref>, external temperature
					ranged from 20 to 35 ºC, which is similar to those values observed at laboratory
					scale (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B1">Arango-Osorno et al. 2016</xref>).</p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f3">
						<label>Fig. 3</label>
						<caption>
							<title>External temperature change during cane bagasse composting at
								field-scale. A) Values from each sampling site. B) Open circles:
								average values (grouped within a week window). For comparison,
								corresponding average values of inner temperature (closed circles,
								same as in <bold>Fig. 2</bold>) are shown. In both cases, mean ±
								standard deviation values are shown. Dotted line represents the
								minimum square linear regression</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="0188-4999-rica-36-02-361-gf3.png"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>Inner and external temperatures had a low determination coefficient vs. time:
						R<sup>2</sup> = 0.50 and 0.52, respectively. Positive slope values reflect a
					temperature increase rate of 0.59 ºC/week and 0.24 ºC/week <xref ref-type="fig"
						rid="f2">(<bold>Figs. 2</bold></xref> and <xref ref-type="fig" rid="f3"
						>3</xref>). Therefore, temperature variations are larger than any observed
					correlation or rate, in other words, there is no significant correlation between
					time and inner or external temperature (or their difference). As the depth could
					affect inner temperature and aeration, it is logic to assume that it would also
					affect biodegradation of organic matter.</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Organic matter kinetics</title>
				<p>Regardless of the scale, compost organic matter levels, at the end of composting
					process are expected to be 30-50 %. Organic matter decay and maturation time was
					similar (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t1">Table I</xref>) among the five studied
					piles and with the values reported for pilot scale (<xref ref-type="fig"
						rid="f4">Fig. 4</xref>; <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B11">Rodríguez et al.
						2013</xref>). Three mathematical equations were evaluated to model organic
					matter decay, as it has been described previously by <xref ref-type="bibr"
						rid="B12">Roncevic et al. (2005)</xref>: one linear and two exponentials,
					corresponding to the following: </p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f4">
						<label>Fig. 4</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Variation of organic matter content during cane bagasse
								composting at field-scale. A) Values from each sampling site. B)
								Average values (grouped within a week window). Dotted line
								represents exponential regression</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="0188-4999-rica-36-02-361-gf4.png"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>
					<disp-formula id="e1">
						<mml:math id="m1" display="block">
							<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:msub>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msub>
							<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
							<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
							<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
							<mml:mi> </mml:mi>
						</mml:math>
						<label>(1)</label>
					</disp-formula>
				</p>
				<p>
					<disp-formula id="e2">
						<mml:math id="m2" display="block">
							<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:msub>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msub>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
									<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
									<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msup>
						</mml:math>
						<label>(2)</label>
					</disp-formula>
				</p>
				<p>
					<disp-formula id="e3">
						<mml:math id="m3" display="block">
							<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
							<mml:mo>=</mml:mo>
							<mml:msub>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>M</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mn>0</mml:mn>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msub>
							<mml:msup>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mi>e</mml:mi>
								</mml:mrow>
								<mml:mrow>
									<mml:mo>-</mml:mo>
									<mml:mi>k</mml:mi>
									<mml:msqrt>
										<mml:mi>t</mml:mi>
									</mml:msqrt>
								</mml:mrow>
							</mml:msup>
						</mml:math>
						<label>(3)</label>
					</disp-formula>
				</p>
				<p>Where <italic>M</italic> represents organic matter content in percent (dry basis)
					at time t; <italic>M</italic>
					<sub>
						<italic>0</italic>
					</sub> , calculated initial organic matter (or at time 0) in percent;
						<italic>t</italic>, time in days and <italic>k</italic>, decay or
					degradation rate constant according to the respective model, in 1 / days only
					for linear and first exponential model (equations 1 and 2).</p>
				<p>For comparison, averages or all the values (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig.
						4A</xref>) were used to evaluate the correlation <xref ref-type="table"
						rid="t2">(<bold>Table II</bold></xref>). Average values were also used for
					contrast (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f4">Fig. 4B</xref>). They were calculated
					considering the corresponding time zero for each site regardless the site, in
					other words, values from different sites were averaged when they were within a
					time window of two days. </p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t2">
						<label>TABLE II</label>
						<caption>
							<title>KINETIC PARAMETERS FOR ORGANIC MATTER DECAY</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">Model</td>
									<td align="center">R<sup>2</sup></td>
									<td align="center">M<sub>0</sub></td>
									<td align="center">k<sub>a</sub></td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" colspan="4">Using all data (n=28) </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0.665</td>
									<td align="center">72.1</td>
									<td align="center">-0.348</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0.593</td>
									<td align="center">70.5</td>
									<td align="center">-0.006</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0.629</td>
									<td align="center">70.5</td>
									<td align="center">-0.083</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center" colspan="4">Average values (n=10) </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0.834</td>
									<td align="center">73.3</td>
									<td align="center">-0.366</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0.822</td>
									<td align="center">74.3</td>
									<td align="center">-0.007</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center">-0.833</td>
									<td align="center">91.7</td>
									<td align="center">-0.086</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN2">
								<p>For first and second models, units of k are 1 /days</p>
							</fn>
							<fn id="TFN3">
								<p>R<sup>2</sup> = determination coefficient, the other variable
									depends on the equation as listed in the first column.
										M<sub>0</sub> = organic matter at time 0, k = kinetics
									constant</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
				<p>Correlation coefficients are close or higher than 0.6, regardless of the
					averaging or the model. Considering that they arise from field-scale
					measurements having several variables that were not controlled, they reflect
					proper models. The use of average values led to higher correlation coefficient
					values (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t2">Table II</xref>). Although averaging
					reduces the number of time points for modeling, (n = 10), the n is still above
					7, below which the n could have an important effect on the coefficient
					correlation. The values of correlation coefficient from the three models are
					very similar. Regardless of the n or model used, <italic>M</italic>
					<sub>
						<italic>0</italic>
					</sub> value is 70-74 %, exception made of the third model described by <xref
						ref-type="bibr" rid="B12">Roncevic et al. (2005)</xref> for hydrocarbon
					degradation. Using that model, <italic>M</italic>
					<sub>
						<italic>0</italic>
					</sub> is higher than the rest of all the models. Although the
						<italic>M</italic>
					<sub>
						<italic>0</italic>
					</sub> value was calculated for the models, the values are very close to the
					real ones, which were 72-84 %. Thus, the third model using seems not to be
					adequate or advantageous. Moreover, R<sup>2</sup> and <italic>M</italic>
					<sub>
						<italic>0</italic>
					</sub> values from the linear and exponential models are similar, suggesting
					that either model could be used. This can be observed graphically: when plotting
					the calculated values of organic matter from the exponential model within the
					time window of the present work, they look quite linear (<xref ref-type="fig"
						rid="f4">Fig. 4B</xref>). </p>
				<p>The linear model is easier and more pragmatic to use in field, thus, quick
					calculations can be done. Also, the kinetic constant <italic>k</italic> is very
					similar regardless the number of data points used, raw or average values,
					suggesting that even the data variability from this field-scale study does not
					impact on the kinetic parameters. Taking all this into account, it is possible
					to model the degradation kinetics of the organic matter decay at field-scale
					using a linear model, which will ease on-field calculations. Parameter
						<italic>k</italic> values for each site (<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3"
						>Table III</xref>) range from -0.31 to -0.53 %/day, i.e., 2.2-3.7 % of
					organic matter is degraded per week. As far as we know, no other kinetic
					constants of organic matter decay at field-scale have been reported. Knowing the
					kinetic model and constants or organic matter decay will help prospect or
					predict compost degradation at the commercial level and ease the (on-field)
					calculations, which in its turn, will reduce the effort and time the analysis
					needs to be performed on the field. The fact that the data adjusts to a linear
					model seems to be due to a pseudo-zero order. Although seems independent of the
					organic carbon content, that could be caused by the slow process and high
					variability of the parameters involved such as temperature or other metabolic
					needs for bacterial biodegradation.</p>
				<p>
					<table-wrap id="t3">
						<label>TABLE III</label>
						<caption>
							<title>PLANT-GROWTH PROMOTING CAPABILITIES AND CATECHOL 2,3-DIOXYGENASE
								(C23DO) ACTIVITIES.</title>
						</caption>
						<table frame="hsides" rules="groups">
							<colgroup>
								<col/>
								<col/>
								<col span="2"/>
								<col/>
								<col/>
							</colgroup>
							<tbody>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify" rowspan="2">Bacterial genus</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Phosphate (mg/L)</td>
									<td align="center" colspan="2">Indolacetic acid production
										(μg/mL)</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">Siderophore production</td>
									<td align="center" rowspan="2">C23DO activity</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="center">with Trp</td>
									<td align="center">without Trp</td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
									<td align="center"> </td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">6.8</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">5.9</td>
									<td align="center">52.7</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">10.2</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">4.8</td>
									<td align="center">8.8</td>
									<td align="center">3.0</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">7.3</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">5.8</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">6.6</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">5.4</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">7.6</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">16.8</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">1.3</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Lysinibacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">6.0</td>
									<td align="center">12.3</td>
									<td align="center">4.9</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">6.7</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">6.6</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">19.8</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">8.7</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">25.9</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">18.5</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">13.1</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">29.5</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">7.6</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">6.8</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Bacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">11.0</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
								<tr>
									<td align="justify"><italic>Lysinibacillus</italic></td>
									<td align="center">8.6</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">28.8</td>
									<td align="center">-</td>
									<td align="center">0</td>
								</tr>
							</tbody>
						</table>
						<table-wrap-foot>
							<fn id="TFN4">
								<p>Trp = trypophan<bold>.</bold> Activity of C23DO is expressed in
									μmole/min/mg protein</p>
							</fn>
						</table-wrap-foot>
					</table-wrap>
				</p>
			</sec>
			<sec>
				<title>Bacterial community in compost</title>
				<p>The most abundant bacterial classes are Bacilli (5.6 %) and Anaerolineae (9.2 %,
						<xref ref-type="fig" rid="f5">Fig. 5</xref>). Bacilli group contains
					heterotrophic bacteria. Recently, a species of <italic>Bacillus</italic> has
					been found to be termophillic and encode for a mannannase, a hemicellulase
						(<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B16">Wang et al. 2018</xref>). Also,
					Anaerolineae, a class of Chloroflexi bacteria has been reported to encode for
					cellulase and precursors for biofilm (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Xia et al.
						2016</xref>). Thus, the presence of these classes could be explained by the
					presence of cellulose or hemicellulose present in the initial compost substrate.
					Moreover, as <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Xia et al. (2016)</xref> have
					pointed out, the Anaerolineae capability to form biolayers could be helpful to
					allow other bacteria or consortia to join together on matrices or particles to
					enhance biodegradation or allowing other bacteria to grow on the substrate
					surface. Despite that, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="B14">Xia et al. (2016)</xref>
					observed that Anaerolineae relative abundance could decrease with the time.
					Contrastingly, Anaerolineae was the most abundant class in compost.
					Contrastingly, Anaerolineae was the most abundant class in compost. This
					suggests that the final compost itself could be used as an inoculum for
					subsequent bagasse composting. Further studies on this sense, beyond the aim of
					the present work, are required. </p>
				<p>
					<fig id="f5">
						<label>Fig. 5</label>
						<caption>
							<title>Relative abundance of bacterial class from metagenomic analysis.
								Only those classes with more than 1 % of relative abundance are
								shown. Taken together they represent 26.4 % of the 14 730 hits of
								the total bacterial population. The rest of the classes have less
								than 1 % of relative abundance or are unknown</title>
						</caption>
						<graphic xlink:href="0188-4999-rica-36-02-361-gf5.png"/>
					</fig>
				</p>
				<p>Although obtaining an inoculum with the whole consortia would be the most
					adequate for downstream applications, when using conventional methods, only
						<italic>Bacillus</italic> and <italic>Lysinibacillus</italic> were isolated
						(<xref ref-type="table" rid="t3">Table III</xref>). Since some species from
						<italic>Bacillus</italic> genus have been described to be resistant to
					temperature, is not rare to observe them at the end of composting.
						<italic>Bacillus</italic> has 3.2 % relative abundance in the compost
					according to metagenomic analysis and <italic>Lysinibacillus</italic> were 0.37
					% abundant. Keeping that in mind, this suggests that <italic>Bacillu</italic>s
					are 8.6 times more abundant than <italic>Lysinibacillus</italic>. Indeed, when
					isolated in conventional culture media, <italic>Bacillus</italic> were 14 of the
					16 species isolated, whereas <italic>Lysinibacillus</italic> are the other two.
					All of the isolates solubilize phosphate, and none of them produced
					siderophores. In the presence of tryptophan, eight, i.e. 50 % of them were able
					to produce the phytohormone, indoleacetic acid, whereas, only three isolates
					would produce the latter in the absence of the aminoacid precursor. Also, three
					were able to show C23O activity, an enzyme part of the pathway to degrade
					aromatic compounds, including lignin derivatives. Taken all this together, and
					since the metagenomic and capacity for promoting plant growth analysis were
					carried out with the final compost, it suggests that the microbiota would make
					the compost able to be used as a fertilizer. Moreover, microbiota from Bacilli
					class would still be able to degrade lignocellulosic residues as described
					above. </p>
			</sec>
		</sec>
		<sec sec-type="conclusions">
			<title>CONCLUSIONS</title>
			<p>It is possible to model the organic matter decay using linear equations at
				field-scale.</p>
			<p>This will allow future prospections at economic level for enterprises and scientists,
				especially because this work was at the same real-world conditions, when not every
				parameter can be controlled as in the bench or pilot scale, but as enterprises
				actually do in Latin America. Temperature and organic matter content at laboratory
				scale might vary among scales, but our findings suggest that field scale
				(commercial) parameters seems to be closer to pilot-scale reported by others. It
				seems that composting depends more on the microbiome and organic matter than in the
				feedstock per se. The compost produced has bacteria able to promote plant-growth and
				possibly to enhance degradation of lignocellulose residues.</p>
			<p>This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public,
				commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.</p>
		</sec>
	</body>
	<back>
		<ref-list>
			<title>REFERENCES</title>
			<ref id="B1">
				<mixed-citation>Arango-Osorno S., Montoya R. J., Vásquez Y. and Flor D.Y. (2016).
					Physicochemical and microbiological analysis of composting process of leguminous
					and manure biomass. Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hort. 10 (2), 345-354. DOI:
					10.17584/rcch.2016v10i2.5751 </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Arango-Osorno</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Montoya</surname>
							<given-names>R. J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Vásquez</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Flor</surname>
							<given-names>D.Y.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Physicochemical and microbiological analysis of composting
						process of leguminous and manure biomass</article-title>
					<source>Rev. Colomb. Cienc. Hort</source>
					<volume>10</volume>
					<issue>2</issue>
					<fpage>345</fpage>
					<lpage>354</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.17584/rcch.2016v10i2.5751</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B2">
				<mixed-citation>Bueno-Márquez P., Díaz-Blanco M.J. and Cabrera-Capitán F. (2008).
					Factores que afectan el proceso de compostaje. In: Compostaje. (J. Moreno-Casco
					and R. Moral-Herrero, Eds.) Mundi Prensa, Madrid, Spain, pp. 93-110. </mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="book">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Bueno-Márquez</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Díaz-Blanco</surname>
							<given-names>M.J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Cabrera-Capitán</surname>
							<given-names>F.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<chapter-title>Factores que afectan el proceso de compostaje</chapter-title>
					<source>Compostaje</source>
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Moreno-Casco</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Moral-Herrero</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<publisher-name>Mundi Prensa</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Madrid, Spain</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>93</fpage>
					<lpage>110</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B3">
				<mixed-citation>EPA (1998). EPA530-R-98-008. An analysis of composting as an
					environmental remediation technology. Office of solid waste and emergency
					response, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D. C., USA,
					115 pp. DOI: 10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00035-1</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>EPA</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1998</year>
					<source>EPA530-R-98-008. An analysis of composting as an environmental
						remediation technology</source>
					<publisher-name>Office of solid waste and emergency response, United States
						Environmental Protection Agency</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D. C., USA</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>115</fpage>
					<lpage>115</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/S0956-053X(02)00035-1</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B4">
				<mixed-citation>EPA (1997a) EPA530-F-97-043. Innovative uses of compost, erosion
					control, turf remediation, and landscaping. Office of solid waste and emergency
					response, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D. C., USA,
					8 pp.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>EPA</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<source>EPA530-F-97-043. Innovative uses of compost, erosion control, turf
						remediation, and landscaping</source>
					<publisher-name>Office of solid waste and emergency response, United States
						Environmental Protection Agency</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D. C., USA</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>8</fpage>
					<lpage>8</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B5">
				<mixed-citation>EPA (1997b) EPA530-F-97-042. Innovative uses of compost,
					bioremediation and pollution prevention. Office of solid waste and emergency
					response, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D. C., USA,
					6 pp.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>EPA</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>1997</year>
					<source>EPA530-F-97-042. Innovative uses of compost, bioremediation and
						pollution prevention</source>
					<publisher-name>Office of solid waste and emergency response, United States
						Environmental Protection Agency</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D. C., USA</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>6</fpage>
					<lpage>6</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B6">
				<mixed-citation>EPA (2006) EPA542/F-06/013. In situ treatment technologies for
					contaminated soil. Office of solid waste and emergency response, United States
					Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D. C., USA, 35 pp.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>EPA</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2006</year>
					<source>EPA542/F-06/013. In situ treatment technologies for contaminated
						soil</source>
					<publisher-name>Office of solid waste and emergency response, United States
						Environmental Protection Agency</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D. C., USA</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>35</fpage>
					<lpage>35</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B7">
				<mixed-citation>EPA (2008) EPA542/R-08/002. Green remediation: incorporating
					sustainable environmental practices into remediation of contaminated sites.
					Office of solid waste and emergency response, United States Environmental
					Protection Agency. Washington, D. C., USA, 176 pp.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>EPA</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2008</year>
					<source>EPA542/R-08/002. Green remediation: incorporating sustainable
						environmental practices into remediation of contaminated sites</source>
					<publisher-name>Office of solid waste and emergency response, United States
						Environmental Protection Agency</publisher-name>
					<publisher-loc>Washington, D. C., USA</publisher-loc>
					<fpage>176</fpage>
					<lpage>176</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B8">
				<mixed-citation>EPA (2016). Types of composting and understanding the process.
					United States Environmental Protection Agency [online]. <comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri"
							xlink:href="http://www.epa.gov/sustainable-management-food/types-composting-and-understanding-process"
							>http://www.epa.gov/sustainable-management-food/types-composting-and-understanding-process</ext-link>
					</comment> 12/01/17.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="report">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>EPA</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<source>Types of composting and understanding the process</source>
					<publisher-name>United States Environmental Protection Agency</publisher-name>
					<comment>
						<ext-link ext-link-type="uri"
							xlink:href="http://www.epa.gov/sustainable-management-food/types-composting-and-understanding-process"
							>http://www.epa.gov/sustainable-management-food/types-composting-and-understanding-process</ext-link>
					</comment>
					<date-in-citation content-type="access-date" iso-8601-date="2017-01-12"
						>12/01/17</date-in-citation>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B9">
				<mixed-citation>Hupert-Kocurek K., Guzik U. and Wojciszynska D. (2012).
					Characterization of catechol 2,3-dioxygenase from <italic>Planococcus</italic>
					sp. strain S5 induced by high phenol concentration. Acta Bioch. Polon. 59 (3),
					345-351.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Hupert-Kocurek</surname>
							<given-names>K.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Guzik</surname>
							<given-names>U.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wojciszynska</surname>
							<given-names>D.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2012</year>
					<article-title>Characterization of catechol 2,3-dioxygenase from Planococcus sp.
						strain S5 induced by high phenol concentration</article-title>
					<source>Acta Bioch. Polon.</source>
					<volume>59</volume>
					<issue>3</issue>
					<fpage>345</fpage>
					<lpage>351</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B10">
				<mixed-citation>Ramírez-Sandoval M. and Velázquez-Fernández J.B. (2013).
					Organ-dependent GST activation in <italic>Ocimum basilicum</italic> by
					endosulfan exposure. Química hoy, Chemistry Sciences 3 (1),
					38-40.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Ramírez-Sandoval</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Velázquez-Fernández</surname>
							<given-names>J.B.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Organ-dependent GST activation in Ocimum basilicum by endosulfan
						exposure. Química hoy</article-title>
					<source>Chemistry Sciences</source>
					<volume>3</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>38</fpage>
					<lpage>40</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B11">
				<mixed-citation>Rodríguez R., Jiménez J.F., Real J.I., Salcedo E., Zamora J.F. and
					Íñiguez G. (2013). Utilization of byproducts of tequila industry. Composting raw
					agave bagasse and biosolids from a treatment plant of tequila vinasses. Rev.
					Int. Contam. Ambie. 29 (4), 303-313.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Rodríguez</surname>
							<given-names>R.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Jiménez</surname>
							<given-names>J.F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Real</surname>
							<given-names>J.I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Salcedo</surname>
							<given-names>E.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zamora</surname>
							<given-names>J.F.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Íñiguez</surname>
							<given-names>G.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2013</year>
					<article-title>Utilization of byproducts of tequila industry. Composting raw
						agave bagasse and biosolids from a treatment plant of tequila
						vinasses</article-title>
					<source>Rev. Int. Contam. Ambie</source>
					<volume>29</volume>
					<issue>4</issue>
					<fpage>303</fpage>
					<lpage>313</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B12">
				<mixed-citation>Roncevic S., Dalmacija B., Ivancev-Tumas I., Trickovic J., Petrovic
					O., Klasnja M. and J. Agbaba. (2005). Kinetics of degradation of hydrocarbons in
					the contaminated soil layer. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 49 (1), 27-36. DOI:
					10.1007/s00244-004-0048-6</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Roncevic</surname>
							<given-names>S.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dalmacija</surname>
							<given-names>B.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Ivancev-Tumas</surname>
							<given-names>I.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Trickovic</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Petrovic</surname>
							<given-names>O.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Klasnja</surname>
							<given-names>M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Agbaba</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					
					</person-group>
					<year>2005</year>
					<article-title>Kinetics of degradation of hydrocarbons in the contaminated soil
						layer</article-title>
					<source>Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol</source>
					<volume>49</volume>
					<issue>1</issue>
					<fpage>27</fpage>
					<lpage>36</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s00244-004-0048-6</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B13">
				<mixed-citation>SEMARNAT (2000). NOM-021-RECNAT-2000. Norma oficial mexicana que
					establece las especificicaciones de fertilidad, salinidad y clasificación de
					suelos. Estudios, muestreo y análisis. Secretaría de medio ambiente y recursos
					naturales. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Mexico City, Mexico, 73
					pp.</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="legal-doc">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<collab>SEMARNAT</collab>
					</person-group>
					<year>2000</year>
					<article-title>NOM-021-RECNAT-2000. Norma oficial mexicana que establece las
						especificicaciones de fertilidad, salinidad y clasificación de suelos.
						Estudios, muestreo y análisis</article-title>
					<source>Secretaría de medio ambiente y recursos naturales. Diario Oficial de la
						Federación. Mexico City, Mexico</source>
					<fpage>73</fpage>
					<lpage>73</lpage>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B14">
				<mixed-citation>Xia Y., Wang Y., Wang Y., Chin F.Y.L. and Zhang T. (2016). Cellular
					adhesiveness and cellulolytic capacity in Anaerolineae revealed by omics-based
					genome interpretation. Biotechnol. for Biofuels. 9, 111. DOI:
					10.1186/s13068-016-0524-z</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xia</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Chin</surname>
							<given-names>F.Y.L.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>T.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2016</year>
					<article-title>Cellular adhesiveness and cellulolytic capacity in Anaerolineae
						revealed by omics-based genome interpretation</article-title>
					<source>Biotechnol. for Biofuels.</source>
					<volume>9</volume>
					<issue>111</issue>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1186/s13068-016-0524-z</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B15">
				<mixed-citation>Xu P. and J. Li. (2017). Effects of microbial inoculant on physical
					and chemical properties in pig manure composting. Compost Sci. Util. 25 (Sup1),
					S37-S42. DOI: 10.1080/1065657X.2017.1295886</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Xu</surname>
							<given-names>P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Li</surname>
							<given-names>J.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2017</year>
					<article-title>Effects of microbial inoculant on physical and chemical
						properties in pig manure composting</article-title>
					<source>Compost Sci. Util.</source>
					<volume>25</volume>
					<supplement>1</supplement>
					<fpage>S37</fpage>
					<lpage>S42</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1065657X.2017.1295886</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
			<ref id="B16">
				<mixed-citation>Wang X.C., You S.P., Zhang J.X., Dai Y.M., Zhang C.Y., Qi W., Dou
					T.Y., Su R.X. and He Z.M. (2018). Rational design of a thermophilic β-mannanase
					from <italic>Bacillus subtilis</italic> TJ-102 to improve its thermostability.
					Enzyme Microb. Tech. 118, 50-56. DOI:
					10.1016/j.enzmictec.2018.07.005</mixed-citation>
				<element-citation publication-type="journal">
					<person-group person-group-type="author">
						<name>
							<surname>Wang</surname>
							<given-names>X.C.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>You</surname>
							<given-names>S.P.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>J.X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dai</surname>
							<given-names>Y.M.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Zhang</surname>
							<given-names>C.Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Qi</surname>
							<given-names>W.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Dou</surname>
							<given-names>T.Y.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>Su</surname>
							<given-names>R.X.</given-names>
						</name>
						<name>
							<surname>He</surname>
							<given-names>Z.M.</given-names>
						</name>
					</person-group>
					<year>2018</year>
					<article-title>Rational design of a thermophilic β-mannanase from Bacillus
						subtilis TJ-102 to improve its thermostability</article-title>
					<source>Enzyme Microb. Tech.</source>
					<volume>118</volume>
					<fpage>50</fpage>
					<lpage>56</lpage>
					<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.enzmictec.2018.07.005</pub-id>
				</element-citation>
			</ref>
		</ref-list>
	</back>
</article>
