Original articles

Bacteriology of peritonsillar abscess: the changing trend and predisposing factors

Yi-Wen Tsai
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Yu-Hsi Liu
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Hsing-Hao Su *
Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
Tajen University, Taiwan

Bacteriology of peritonsillar abscess: the changing trend and predisposing factors

Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, vol. 84, no. 5, pp. 532-539, 2018

Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cervicofacial

Received: 1 May 2017

Accepted: 16 June 2017

Published: 17 July 2017

Abstract

Introduction: Peritonsillar abscess is the most common deep neck infection. The infectious microorganism may be different according to clinical factors.

Objective: To identify the major causative pathogen of peritonsillar abscess and investigate the relationship between the causative pathogen, host clinical factors, and hospitalization duration.

Methods: This retrospective study included 415 hospitalized patients diagnosed with peritonsillar abscess who were admitted to a tertiary medical center from June 1990 to June 2013. We collected data by chart review and analyzed variables such as demographic characteristics, underlying systemic disease, smoking, alcoholism, betel nut chewing, bacteriology, and hospitalization duration.

Results: A total of 168 patients had positive results for pathogen isolation. Streptococcus viridans (28.57%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (23.21%) were the most common microorganisms identified through pus culturing. The isolation rate of anaerobes increased to 49.35% in the recent 6 years (p = 0.048). Common anaerobes were Prevotella and Fusobacterium spp. The identification of K. pneumoniae increased among elderly patients (age > 65 years) with an odds ratio (OR) of 2.76 (p = 0.03), and decreased in the hot season (mean temperature > 26 °C) (OR = 0.49, p = 0.04). No specific microorganism was associated with prolonged hospital stay.

Conclusion: The most common pathogen identified through pus culturing was S. viridans, followed by K. pneumoniae. The identification of anaerobes was shown to increase in recent years. The antibiotics initially selected should be effective against both aerobes and anaerobes. Bacterial identification may be associated with host clinical factors and environmental factors.

KEYWORDS: Anaerobic bacteria+ Bacterial infections+ Klebsiella pneumoniae+ Peritonsillar abscess+ Viridans streptococci.

Introduction

Peritonsillar abscess (PTA), or quinsy, is the most common deep neck infection.1 The abscess may spread into the parapharyngeal space of other deep neck spaces, to the adjacent structure, and to the bloodstream. It rarely occurs but PTA is potentially life threatening. Early diagnosis of PTA is extremely crucial, and appropriate antibiotics and surgical intervention to remove the abscess are required.2 Antibiotics result in a substantial reduction in the progression of this disease. The empirical antibiotic used should be effective against the possible causative pathogen of PTA.

Our objectives were to investigate the microbiology of PTA and to identify its relationship with clinical variables including the underlying systemic disease of patients; habits such as smoking, alcoholism, and betel nut chewing; and hospitalization duration.

Methods

Study design and sample population

This retrospective study included 415 patients with PTA who were admitted to a tertiary medical center located in Southern Taiwan from June 1990 to June 2013. Inclusion criteria were hospitalized patients who were clinically diagnosed with PTA (ICD-9 code 475) by positive pus aspiration or computed tomography (CT) imaging. We reviewed the chart of each patient to collect the following data: admission date, age, sex, height, weight, host clinical factors (diabetes mellitus [DM], hypertension, smoking habit, alcoholism, and betel nut chewing), pus culture result, antibiotic treatment, surgery, and hospitalization duration. The study was approved by the institutional review board.

We classified the bacteria into different categories according to the characteristics of Gram staining and anaerobic properties. We defined prolonged hospitalization as hospitalization duration of more than 6 days. Obesity was defined as a body mass index of more than 27, and elderly patients were defined as those aged older than 65 years. We defined the hot season as the months from May to October when the average temperature in Southern Taiwan was above 26 °C according to the record of the Central Weather Bureau of R.O.C.

Statistical analysis

All data were analyzed using the SPSS statistical software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA), except for the Cochran-Armitage test, which was performed using the SAS program (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). The association with each independent variable was statistically analyzed among the different groups. Categorical variables were compared using the Pearson's Chi-square test or the Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. Odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Trends of isolated pathogens were analyzed using the Cochran-Armitage test. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethic statement

This study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board; the approval protocol number is VGHKS14-CT7-01.

Results

Demographraphic characteristics

This study included 415 patients. The results of pus cultures from either surgery or needle aspiration were available for 266 patients. Adjustments for sample submitted to tonsil surgery or PTA drainage was performed, as shown in Table 1. There is no patient with history of AIDS or HIV infection in this study.

Table 1
Demographraphic characteristics of patients with peritonsillar abscess.
AgeOverall, (n = 266)Diabetes mellitusSmokingAlcoholismBetel-nut chewing
<18 y/o22 (8.27)06 (27.27)5 (22.73)2 (9.09)
18-64 y/o215 (80.83)19 (8.84)111 (51.63)76 (35.35)37 (17.21)
≥65 y/o29 (10.90)4 (13.79)5 (17.24)7 (24.14)3 (10.34)
Total266 (100)23 (8.65)122 (45.86)88 (33.08)42 (15.79)
Data are presented as n (%).y/o indicates "year old".

Bacteriology

Within these patients with pus obtained, 230 (230-266, 86.47%) showed bacterial growth in their pus culture. The pus culture of the remaining 36 patients showed no bacterial growth. Of the 230 patients, 132 (132-230, 57.39%) had polymicrobial pus, including 62 cases merely reported as "normal flora" or "mixed flora" (62-230, 26.96%). Pus cultures of 168 patients (168-266, 63.15%) showed positive results for pathogen isolation. More than a single pathogen was isolated in 64 patients (64-168, 38.10%). Aerobic bacteria were isolated from 85.7% (144/168) of positive cultures, anaerobic or facultative aerobic bacteria from 44.0% (74-168), and mixed aerobic and anaerobic bacteria from 29.8% (50-168).

The most common pathogen identified through pus culturing was Streptococcus viridans (48-168, 28.57%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (39-168, 23.21%) and the beta-hemolytic Streptococcus group (17-168, 10.12%), as shown in Table 2. We divided patients by the 4 periods of 1990-1995, 1996-2001, 2002-2007, and 2008-2013; the isolation rate of the anaerobes was 25%, 23.81%, 45.4.05%, and 49.35%, respectively. The isolation rate of anaerobic pathogens increased significantly between 1990 and 2013 (Cochran-Armitage test, p = 0.048), as shown in Table 3 and Fig. 1. The isolation rates of gram-positive bacteria and gram-negative bacteria in these 4 periods were 100% and 25%, 57.14% and 47.62%, 62.12% and 48.48%, and 51.95% and 49.35%, respectively. Most of the anaerobic pathogens were Prevotella spp. (24-168, 14.29%) and Fusobacterium spp. (16-168, 9.52%), as shown in Table 2.

Table 2
Bacteriology of 168 patients with peritonsillar abscess with definite isolation of pus culture.
Causative pathogenOverall (n = 168)DM (n = 17)HTN (n = 22)Smoking (n = 78)Alcoholism (n = 59)Betel-Nut chewing (n = 27)Obesity (n = 30)
Aerobic GNB51 (30.36)10 (58.82)8 (36.36)22 (28.21)15 (25.4.02)8 (29.63)8 (26.67)
Klebsiella pneumoniae39 (23.21)7 (41.18)7 (31.82)19 (24.36)13 (22.03)7 (25.93)7 (23.33)
Aerobic GPB22 (13.10)10 (58.82)5 (22.73)12 (15.38)11 (18.64)4 (14.81)6 (20.00)
Aerobic GNC4 (2.38)1 (5.88)1 (4.55)1 (1.28)1 (1.69)1 (3.70)2 (6.67)
Aerobic GPC99 (58.93)10 (58.82)12 (54.55)46 (58.97)32 (61.02)21 (77.78)19 (63.33)
Staphylococcus spp.9 (5.36)0 (0.00)1 (4.55)5 (4.6)5 (8.47)1 (3.70)2 (6.67)
Beta-hemolytic streptococcus group18 (10.71)1 (5.88)1 (4.55)15 (19.23)10 (16.95)4 (14.81)4 (13.33)
Streptococcus melliri group24 (14.29)4 (23.53)4 (18.18)10 (12.82)8 (13.56)9 (33.33)4 (13.33)
Streptococcus viridans group48 (28.57)5 (29.41)7 (31.82)16 (20.51)13 (22.03)7 (25.93)7 (23.33)
Anaerobic cocci34 (20.23)5 (29.41)5 (22.73)17 (21.79)13 (22.03)7 (25.93)11 (36.67)
Peptostreptococcus spp.9 (5.36)1 (5.88)1 (4.55)7 (8.97)6 (10.17)3 (11.11)4 (13.33)
Anaerobic GPB14 (8.33)1 (5.88)5 (22.73)5 (6.41)4 (6.78)2 (7.41)3 (10.00)
Anaerobic GNB45 (26.79)1 (5.88)6 (27.27)24 (30.77)18 (30.51)7 (25.93)6 (20.00)
Fusobacterium spp.17 (10.12)0 (0.00)1 (4.55)10 (12.82)6 (10.17)3 (11.11)2 (6.67)
Prevotella spp.24 (14.29)1 (5.88)4 (18.18)11 (14.10)10 (16.95)4 (18.18)4 (13.33)
Data are presented as n (%).Aerobic isolates included aerobic and facultative anaerobic isolates.DM, diabetes mellitus; GNB, gram-negative bacilli; GNC, gram-negative cocci; GPB, gram-positive bacilli; GPC, gram-positive cocci; HTN, hypertension.
Table 3
Isolation rate of different types of bacteria during each 6 year interval, 1990-2013.
Years, number of patient types (%) of bacteria1990-19951996-20012002-20072008-2013Total (1990-2013)Test for trends (p-value)
Gram positive (% of total patient)4 (100)12 (57.14)41 (62.12)40 (51.95)97 (57.74)0.120
Gram negative (% of total patient)1 (25)10 (47.62)32 (48.48)38 (49.35)81 (48.21)0.569
Anaerobes (% of total patient)1 (25)5 (23.81)30 (45.4.05)38 (49.35)74 (44.05)0.048a
Patient4216677168 
a Denotes for p-value less than 0.05.

Isolation rate of different types of bacteria during each 6 year
                interval.
Figure 1
Isolation rate of different types of bacteria during each 6 year interval.

Host clinical factors were associated with several isolated pathogens. Betel nut chewing was associated with the isolation of gram-positive cocci (GPC) (OR = 2.67, p = 0.04). The association of bacterial isolation with smoking habit and alcoholism was not statistically significant. Elderly patients (age > 65 years) had higher K. pneumoniae isolation (OR = 2.76, p = 0.03). Obesity (BMI > 27) was associated with a higher isolation of Peptostreptococcus (OR = 4.19, p = 0.04), as shown in Table 4.

Table 4
Association between the predisposing factors and the pathogen.a
Predisposing factorsCausative pathogenOR95% CIp-value
ElderbKP2.761.10-6.930.03e
ObesitycPeptostreptococcus4.190.98-17.880.04e
Hot seasondGPB3.221.13-9.190.02e
KP0.490.23-1.010.04e
Betel-Nut chewingGPC2.671.02-7.020.04e
a No statistically difference was observed among bacterial isolates and smoking, alcoholism, and DM.b Elderly indicates patient's age was more than 65 years old.c Obesity indicates patient's body mass index was more than 27.d Hot season indicates the admission date was between May and October, during which time the average temperature in southern Taiwan was more than 27 ºC.e Denotes for p-value less than 0.05.

CI, confidence interval; DM, diabetes mellitus; GPB, gram-positive bacilli; GPC, gram-positive cocci; HTN, hypertension; KP, Klebsiella pneumoniae; OR, odds ratio.

In addition, in the hot season, we found that the risk of isolating gram-positive bacilli (GPB) increased (OR = 3.22, p = 0.02), but that of K. pneumoniae isolation decreased (OR = 0.49, p = 0.04), as shown in Table 4. There was no specific microorganism associated with prolonged hospital stay.

Searching from the PubMed database, there were 30 studies involved in bacteriology of PTA during 1980-2016. The timeframes, the geographical locations and the predominant bacterial species identified in these studies were listed in Table 5.

Table 5
Studies involved in bacteriology of PTA during 1980-2016.
InvestigatorCountryYearPositive culturePredominant aerobesPredominant anaerobes
Brook et al. (1981)19U.S.-16Gamma-hemolytic streptococciBacteroides sp.
   Alpha-hemolytic streptococciAnaerobic GPC
Jokipii et al. (1988)8Finland-42Group A streptococcusPeptostreptococcus sp.
   Streptococcus viridans groupBacteroides sp.
Brook et al. (1991)37U.S.1978-198534Staphylococcus aureusBacteroides sp.
   Streptococcus pyogenesPeptostreptococcus sp.
Snow et al. (1991)38UK-55Beta hemolytic streptococci-
   Staphylococcus aureus 
Jousimies-Somer et al. (1993)20Finland-122Streptococcus pyogenesFusobacterium necrophorum
   Streptococcus milleri groupPrevotella melaninogenica
Mitchelmore et al. (1995)9UK1982-199245Group A streptococcusPeptostreptococcus sp.
    Prevotella
Muir et al. (1995)39New Zealand1990-199239Group A streptococcus-
Prior et al. (1995)40Cherukuri (2002)UK-45--
USA1990-199982Streptococcus sp.-
   Haemophilus sp. 
Matsuda et al. (2002)10Japan1988-1999386Alpha-hemolytic streptococciAnaerobic gram-negative rods
   Neisseria sp.Porphyromnas sp.
Hanna et al. (2006)41Northern Ireland2001-200237Group A streptococciBacteroides sp.
Sakae et al. (2006)42Brazil200126Streptococcus viridansPeptostreptococcus sp.
   Streptococcus pyogenesPrevotella sp.
Zagolski et al. (2007)Poland-12Streptococcus sp.Bacteroides sp.
Megalamani et al. (2008)India2003-200639Beta hemolytic streptococcus-
   Pseudomonas 
Sunnergren et al. (2008)7Sweden2000-200667Group A streptococcusBacteroides sp.
Klug et al. (2009)11Denmark2001-2006405Group A streptococcusFusobacterium sp.
   Groups C or G streptococci 
Gavriel et al. (2009)6Israel1996-2002137Streptococcus pyogenesPrevotella sp.
   Streptococcus intermediusPeptostreptococcus sp.
Segal et al. (2009)4Israel2004-200764Group A streptococcus-
   Group C streptococcus 
Repanos et al. (2009)32UK1998-2005107Streptococcal sp.-
Rusan et al. (2009)Denmark2001-2006623Group A streptococcusFusobacterium sp.
Acharya et al. (2010)5Nepal2007-200818Streptococcus pyogenes-
   Staphylococcus aureus 
Marom et al. (2010)17Canada1998-2007180Streptococcus viridans-
   Group A streptococcus 
Hidaka et al. (2011)43Japan2002-200765Streptococcus milleri groupPrevotella sp.
   Other Streptococcus sp.Peptostreptococcus sp.
Klug et al. (2011)12Denmark2005-200936Streptococcus viridansPrevotella sp.
   Neisseria sp.Fusobacterium sp.
Love et al. (2011)13New Zealand2006-2008147Group A streptococcus Other beta-hemolytic streptococciFusobacterium sp.
Albertz et al. (2012)16Chile2000-2012112Streptococcus pyogenesBacteroides sp.
   Other streptococciPeptostreptococcus sp.
    Fusobacterium sp.
Takenaka et al. (2012)3Japan2005-200950Streptococcus pyogenesAnaerobic
    Streptococcus
    Fusobacterium sp.
Sowerby et al. (2013)14Canada2009-201042Group A streptococcus-
   Streptococcus anginosus 
Gavriel et al. (2015)Israel1996-2003132Streptococcus pyogenesPrevotella sp.
    Peptostreptococcus sp.
Mazur et al. (2015)18Poland2003-201345Streptococcus viridans groupFusobacterium sp.
   Streptococcus pyogenesPrevotella sp.
Plum et al. (2015)44USA2002-201269Streptococcus milleri in adults-
   β-hemolytic streptococcus in children 
Lepelletier et al. (2016)36French2009-2012412Group A streptococciFusobacterium spp.
Tachibana et al. (2016)45Japan2008-213100Streptococcus viridansFusobacterium sp.
Vaikjarv et al. (2016)46Estonia2011-201222Streptococcus sp.Streptococcus spp.
Present study (2017)Taiwan1990-2013168Streptococcus ViridansPrevotella sp.
   Klebsiella PneumoniaeFusobacterium sp.
-, indicates "not disclosed".

Table 5. Cont.
Studies involved in bacteriology of PTA during 1980-2016.
Studies involved in bacteriology of PTA during 1980-2016.
-, indicates "not disclosed".

Several broad-spectrum antibiotics such as penicillin or cefazolin combined with gentamycin (GM) and metronidazole, clindamycin plus GM, or augmentin along were used in our series. All these antibiotics were effective without any significant difference.

Discussion

In our study, the most common pathogen identified through pus culturing in patients with PTA was S. viridans, followed by K. pneumoniae; commonly isolated anaerobes in our study were Prevotella and Fusobacterium spp. We reviewed the bacteriology data from previous studies, as shown in Table 5. Most of the studies3-16 have reported group A Streptococcus as the most common aerobic pathogen in PTA; some studies12,17,18 have reported that common aerobic pathogens were S. viridans, followed by group A β-hemolytic streptococci. The prevalence of K. pneumoniae has been rarely reported in previous studies. In previous studies, Fusobacterium nucleatum,3,8,11,12,15,19,20Prevotella,3,12,19-21Bacteroides,7,8,19Peptostreptococcus,8,9,20 and anaerobic streptococcus12 were the most common anaerobic pathogens. The divergence of bacterial culture may be owing to different geographical location. With difference between diets and lifestyle, the bacterial flora within each people may be also different.

K. pneumoniae and Streptococcus spp. are common oral flora normally found in the mouth and are odontogenic pathogens of deep neck infection.22-24 The S. viridans group is the etiological agent of dental caries, pericoronitis, or, if introduced into the bloodstream, endocarditis. In Taiwan, K. pneumoniae has been linked to lung infection in aspiration patients or a liver abscess25 in immunocompromised patients or those with diabetes.26

Patients with old age27 or diabetes mellitus28 are considered to be immunocompromised and have more chance to get infection. DM and elder are also linked with more complications and higher mortality rate in deep neck infection.29,30 Thus PTA patients with above characteristics often have longer hospital stay.30 We reported the microbiology of PTA in such immunocompromised patients. Patients with DM had no increased risk of isolating K. pneumoniae as the causative pathogen of PTA. By contrast, elderly patients with PTA in the current series had a higher risk of K. pneumoniae isolation.

A trend toward a higher isolation rate for anaerobes was observed during 2002-2013 (p = 0.048). Gavriel6 reported a significant increase in anaerobic growth during 1996-1999 and then a slow nonsignificant decline until 2002. Takenaka3 reported no change in the percentage of cases with anaerobic growth between 2 periods (2005-2007 and 2008-2009). Such a phenomenon might result from a real change in pathogens; the alteration of antibiotics used, or improved culture methods for anaerobic pathogens. In our series, no major alteration of antibiotics used or improvement of the culture methods was observed. Physicians should prescribe empirical antibiotics to cover anaerobes.

PTA is often a polymicrobial infection. Polymicrobial growth was observed in the pus cultures of 57.39% of patients. The rationale of using empirical antibiotics was to cover GPCs, GNBs, and respiratory anaerobes. If necessary, suitable antibiotics should be chosen on the basis of culture results. However, the management of most uncomplicated patients may not be affected by the culture result.31 Repanos et al.32 suggested that using broad-spectrum antibiotics such as cephalosporin or penicillin combined with metronidazole was effective. In our study, no significant difference was found among several combinations of broad-spectrum antibiotics.

Smoking habit has been commonly observed in patients with PTA in several studies17,18,33,34; these studies have reported smoking as a risk factor for PTA. Marom et al.17 reported a significantly higher incidence for S. viridans, other gram-positive cocci isolates, and anaerobes. In our study, no statistical significance was observed in the causative pathogen between smokers and nonsmokers with PTA, similar to the findings of the study by Klug.34

Betel nut chewing is a popular habit in Southeast Asia. To the best of our knowledge, no study has found an association between the bacteriology of PTA and betel nut chewing. In our series, this habit was associated with a higher risk of GPC as a pathogen. In the study by Ling et al.,35 it was associated with a likelihood of subgingival infection by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans and Porphyromonas gingivalis.

In our study, elderly patients (older than 65 year-old) had a high risk of K. pneumoniae isolation. The study by Marom17 reported a significantly higher isolation rate for infection by GPC (mixed Streptococcus species) and gram-negative rods in older patients (40 year-old or older) than in younger patients.

The hot season increased the risk of GPB infection and reduced the risk of K. pneumoniae infection in patients with PTA in our current study. Our institute is located in a tropical region that has approximately six months (May to October) of hot weather, with a mean temperature of 27 °C. By contrast, Klug et al.15 from another institute located in a temperate zone reported a higher incidence of F. nucleatum infection during summer than during winter. It also reported Group A streptococcus was significantly more frequently identified from in the winter and spring. The study in French36 reported PTA caused by S. pyogenes or anaerobes were more prevalent in the winter and spring than summer. Such fluctuation in the microbiology of PTA might be weather related.

In our series, no specific microorganism was associated with the poor prognosis of PTA. This finding is considerably similar to the reports by Marom17 and Mazur.18

Our study has several limitations. Because we retrospectively collected data by chart review, data from the medical record might be lost during the early years. As we used several small populations of isolated pathogens, a larger sample size is necessary to determine the relationship between the isolated pathogen and the predisposing factors.

Conclusions

The most common causative pathogen of PTA was S. viridans, followed by K. pneumoniae. The isolation of anaerobes significantly increased in recent years. The common ones were Prevotella and Fusobacterium spp. Empirical antibiotics targeting both aerobes and anaerobes should be appropriate as treatment. Bacterial isolation may be associated with host clinical factors, environmental factors, and hospitalization duration.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Hsueh-Wen Chang (Department of Biological Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan) for his help in the statistical analysis.

References

Galioto NJ. Peritonsillar abscess. Am Fam Physician. 2008;77:199-202.

Steyer TE. Peritonsillar abscess: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2002;65:93-6.

Takenaka Y, Takeda K, Yoshii T, Hashimoto M, Inohara H. Gram staining for the treatment of peritonsillar abscess. Int J Otolaryngol. 2012;2012:1-5.

Segal N, El-Saied S, Puterman M. Peritonsillar abscess in children in the southern district of Israel. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2009;73:1148-50.

Acharya A, Gurung R, Khanal B, Ghimire A. Bacteriology and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of peritonsillar abscess. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. 2010;49:139-42.

Gavriel H, Lazarovitch T, Pomortsev A, Eviatar E. Variations in the microbiology of peritonsillar abscess. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28:27-31.

Sunnergren O, Swanberg J, Molstad S. Incidence, microbiology and clinical history of peritonsillar abscesses. Scand J Infect Dis. 2008;40:752-5.

Jokipii AM, Jokipii L, Sipila P, Jokinen K. Semiquantitative culture results and pathogenic significance of obligate anaerobes in peritonsillar abscesses. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:957-61.

Mitchelmore IJ, Prior AJ, Montgomery PQ, Tabaqchali S. Microbiological features and pathogenesis of peritonsillar abscesses. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1995;14:870-7.

Matsuda A, Tanaka H, Kanaya T, Kamata K, Hasegawa M. Peritonsillar abscess: a study of 724 cases in Japan. Ear Nose Throat J. 2002;81:384-9.

Ehlers Klug T, Rusan M, Fuursted K, Ovesen T. Fusobacterium necrophorum: most prevalent pathogen in peritonsillar abscess in Denmark. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:1467-72.

Klug TE, Henriksen JJ, Fuursted K, Ovesen T. Significant pathogens in peritonsillar abscesses. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:619-27.

Love RL, Allison R, Chambers ST. Peritonsillar infection in Christchurch 2006-2008: epidemiology and microbiology. N Z Med J. 2011;124:16-23.

Sowerby LJ, Hussain Z, Husein M. The epidemiology, antibiotic resistance and post-discharge course of peritonsillar abscesses in London, Ontario. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;42:1-7.

Klug TE. Incidence and microbiology of peritonsillar abscess: the influence of season, age, and gender. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33:1163-7.

Albertz N, Nazar G. Peritonsillar abscess: treatment with immediate tonsillectomy - 10 years of experience. Acta Otolaryngol. 2012;132:1102-7.

Marom T, Cinamon U, Itskoviz D, Roth Y. Changing trends of peritonsillar abscess. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010;31:162-7.

Mazur E, Czerwinska E, Korona-Glowniak I, Grochowalska A, Koziol-Montewka M. Epidemiology, clinical history and microbiology of peritonsillar abscess. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34:549-54.

Brook I. Aerobic and anaerobic bacteriology of peritonsillar abscess in children. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1981;70:831-5.

Jousimies-Somer H, Savolainen S, Makitie A, Ylikoski J. Bacteriologic findings in peritonsillar abscesses in young adults. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16(Suppl. 4):S292-8.

Brook I. The role of anaerobic bacteria in tonsillitis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69:9-19.

Parhiscar A, Har-El G. Deep neck abscess: a retrospective review of 210 cases. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2001;110:1051-4.

Huang TT, Tseng FY, Yeh TH, Hsu CJ, Chen YS. Factors affecting the bacteriology of deep neck infection: a retrospective study of 128 patients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126:396-401.

Rega AJ, Aziz SR, Ziccardi VB. Microbiology and antibiotic sensitivities of head and neck space infections of odontogenic origin. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2006;64:1377-80.

Siu LK, Yeh KM, Lin JC, Fung CP, Chang FY. Klebsiella pneumoniae liver abscess: a new invasive syndrome. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:881-7.

Wang JH, Liu YC, Lee SS, Yen MY, Chen YS, Wang JH, et al. Primary liver abscess due to Klebsiella pneumoniae in Taiwan. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26:1434-8.

Castle SC. Clinical relevance of age-related immune dysfunction. Clin Infect Dis. 2000;31:578-85.

Geerlings SE, Hoepelman AIM. Immune dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1999;26:259-65.

Huang TT, Liu TC, Chen PR, Tseng FY, Yeh TH, Chen YS. Deep neck infection: analysis of 185 cases. Head Neck. 2004;26:854-60.

Huang TT, Tseng FY, Liu TC, Hsu CJ, Chen YS. Deep neck infection in diabetic patients: comparison of clinical picture and outcomes with nondiabetic patients. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;132:943-7.

Herzon FS. Harris P. Mosher Award thesis. Peritonsillar abscess: incidence, current management practices, and a proposal for treatment guidelines. Laryngoscope. 1995;105:1-17.

Repanos C, Mukherjee P, Alwahab Y. Role of microbiological studies in management of peritonsillar abscess. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123:877-9.

Powell EL, Powell J, Samuel JR, Wilson JA. A review of the pathogenesis of adult peritonsillar abscess: time for a re-evaluation. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2013;68:1941-50.

Klug TE, Rusan M, Clemmensen KK, Fuursted K, Ovesen T. Smoking promotes peritonsillar abscess. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:3163-7.

Ling LJ, Hung SL, Tseng SC, Chen YT, Chi LY, Wu KM, et al. Association between betel quid chewing, periodontal status and periodontal pathogens. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 2001;16:364-9.

Lepelletier D, Pinaud V, Le Conte P, Bourigault C, Asseray N, Ballereau F, et al. Peritonsillar abscess (PTA): clinical characteristics, microbiology, drug exposures and outcomes of a large multicenter cohort survey of 412 patients hospitalized in 13 French university hospitals. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;35:867-73.

Brook I, Frazier EH, Thompson DH. Aerobic and anaerobic microbiology of peritonsillar abscess. Laryngoscope. 1991;101:289-92.

Snow DG, Campbell JB, Morgan DW. The microbiology of peritonsillar sepsis. J Laryngol Otol. 1991;105:553-5.

Muir DC, Papesch ME, Allison RS. Peritonsillar infection in Christchurch 1990-2: microbiology and management. N Z Med J. 1995;108:53-4.

Prior A, Montgomery P, Mitchelmore I, Tabaqchali S. The microbiology and antibiotic treatment of peritonsillar abscesses. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1995;20:219-23.

Hanna BC, McMullan R, Gallagher G, Hedderwick S. The epidemiology of peritonsillar abscess disease in Northern Ireland. J Infect. 2006;52:247-53.

Sakae FA, Imamura R, Sennes LU, Araujo Filho BC, Tsuji DH. Microbiology of peritonsillar abscesses. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2006;72:247-51.

Hidaka H, Kuriyama S, Yano H, Tsuji I, Kobayashi T. Precipitating factors in the pathogenesis of peritonsillar abscess and bacteriological significance of the Streptococcus milleri group. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2011;30:527-32.

Plum AW, Mortelliti AJ, Walsh RE. Microbial flora and antibiotic resistance in peritonsillar abscesses in Upstate New York. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2015;124:875-80.

Tachibana T, Orita Y, Takao S, Ogawara Y, Matsuyama Y, Shimizu A, et al. The role of bacteriological studies in the management of peritonsillar abscess. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2016;43:648-53.

Vaikjarv R, Kasenomm P, Jaanimae L, Kivisild A, Roop T, Sepp E, et al. Microbiology of peritonsillar abscess in the South Estonian population. Microb Ecol Health Dis. 2016;27:27787.

Notes

Peer Review under the responsibility of Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial.
Please cite this article as: Tsai Y-W, Liu Y-H, Su H-H. Bacteriology of peritonsillar abscess: the changing trend and predisposing factors. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;84:532-39.

Author notes

* Corresponding author. E-mail:shsu@vghks.gov.tw (H. Su).

Conflict of interest declaration

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

HTML generated from XML JATS4R by