ABSTRACT:
Training congenital heart surgeons today is challenging for themselves and their
mentors. The situation becomes even more complicated while teaching complex
surgical procedures. Senning operation is one of the most ingenious intracardiac
techniques. We consider this surgical technique a worthy example to stand out
the potential advantage of wet lab training. This article demonstrates the
simulation of the Senning procedure in an explanted porcine model.
Keywords: Animal Model, Congenital Heart Disease, Pediatric.
Carátula del artículo
Senning Procedure: Conceptualization in the Wet Lab
César Castillo Romero
National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio
Chávez, Mexico
Iris Pamela Flores Sarria
National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio
Chávez, Mexico
Gabriella Ricciardi
University of Lille, France
Jorge Luis Cervantes Salazar jorgeluis_cervantes@gmail.com
National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio
Chávez, Mexico
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 38, no. 5, e20230025, 2023
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
Received: 21 January 2023
Accepted: 16 March 2023
INTRODUCTION
The education of young congenital heart surgeons under current residency programs
does not allow them to gain the necessary experience to perform complex procedures
during their training[1]. Senning
operation is one of the most ingenious intracardiac techniques. The atrial switch
procedure was once frequently performed by almost all cardiac centers but recently
it has become an uncommon surgery carried only in specialized centers undertaking
repair of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Due to limited
exposure and technical complexity, the Senning operation is considered a challenging
procedure for young surgeons[2]. We
consider this surgical technique a worthy example of the importance of deliberate
practice in the wet lab[3,4]. This article demonstrates the
feasibility of the Senning procedure in the porcine model and that it can be a
useful tool to conceptualize the surgical technique. This report was approved by the
local institutional review board. The approval included a waiver of informed consent
because it does not show personal data of any patient.
TECHNIQUE
An explanted postmortem porcine heart (from a local butchery) was used. Despite the
presence of normally related great arteries, the surgical principle of the Senning
procedure is adequately simulated:
Fig. 1
(A) Dissection of interatrial groove and right atrial initial
incision. Dotted lines indicate the site of the first incision.
(B) Localization of limbic tissue. The asterisk indicates fossa
ovalis; the dotted lines, incision to create the atrial septal
flap; and the arrow, coronary sinus. (C) Creation of atrial
septal flap. Dotted lines indicate the site where the flap will
be sutured; the arrow, left pulmonary veins; and the star, the
flap extended with a bovine pericardium patch. CT=crista
terminalis; IVC=inferior vena cava; RA=right atrium; RIPV=right
inferior pulmonary vein; RSPV=right superior pulmonary
vein.
Fig. 2
(A) Atrial septal flap sutured. Asterisk indicates the flap
sutured between the left pulmonary veins and the left atrial
appendage. (B) Enlargement of the left atrium and systemic
venous pathway completed. The asterisk indicates second flap
suture; the star, left atrium and right pulmonary veins
enlarged; arrows, the new pulmonary venous course; points A and
B´, augmentation incisions and suture sites for each increased
flap extremity; and dotted lines, the area where the anterior
wall of the right atrium will be sutured. (C) Reconstruction of
pulmonary venous atrium. The red arrow indicates the coping of
edges of the right pulmonary veins to the pericardial
reflection; the asterisk, left atrium; dotted lines, the suture
line site for the third flap; and the black arrow, the new
pulmonary venous pathway. CT=crista terminalis; IVC=inferior
vena cava; RA=right atrium; SVC=superior vena cava.
Fig. 3
(A) Final aspect after the procedure. The arrow indicates the
suture line of the last flap. (B) Schematic drawings of the
Senning procedure. Upper panel shows the shift (red arrows 1, 2,
and 3) of flaps toward the structures in which they will suture
them. In the lower panel, the cross-sectional view shows the
intracardiac tunnels and systemic and pulmonary pathways (black
arrows). IAS=interatrial septum; IVC=inferior vena cava; LA=left
atrium; LIPV=left inferior pulmonary vein; lp=lower part;
LSPV=left superior pulmonary vein; RAAW=right atrial anterior
wall; RALW=right atrial lateral wall; RIPV=right inferior
pulmonary vein; RSPV=right superior pulmonary vein; SVC=superior
vena cava; tp=top part.
- 1.
The Waterston’s groove is dissected as deep as possible without entering the
left atrium (LA). The right atrium (RA) is open anteriorly (5 to 10 mm) and
parallel to the crista terminalis (Figure
1A and Video 1). The
distance between the atrioventricular groove and the first incision should
correspond to approximately two-thirds of the circumference of the superior
vena cava (SVC). The atrial septal flap (first flap) is developed (Video 2): fossa ovalis and the coronary
sinus (CS) should be identified (Figure
1B). Superiorly, the incision of the limbic tissue must be done
toward and within the superior vena caval orifice, inferiorly the incision
should be extended to the junction between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and
the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV).
- 2.
The atrial flap is extended with a small triangular patch of bovine
pericardium (Figure 1C).
- 3.
The atrial septal flap is sutured between the left pulmonary veins and the
left atrial appendage. Superiorly, the flap is sutured to the junction
between the SVC and right superior pulmonary vein, inferiorly to the
intersection between the IVC and the RIPV (Figure 2A and Video 2).
- 4.
The LA is enlarged by incising both right pulmonary veins (RPVs).
- 5.
The right atrial lateral wall (second flap) is sutured along with the
anterior remnant of the limbic tissue, staying away from the
atrioventricular node (systemic venous pathway finished). The CS is left
opening into the new pulmonary venous atrium (Figure 2B).
- 6.
Reconstruction of the pulmonary venous atrium: the right atrial incision is
extended at its ends by two anterior incisions to augment the perimeter of
the atrial flap (points A and B in Figure
2B). Inferiorly, the flap is sewn on the lateral aspect of the
IVC, superiorly the suture line is put on the SVC in front of the cavoatrial
junction. Posteriorly, pericardial reflection is used as an extension: it is
sewn to the edges of RPVs and LA to obtain as large an opening as possible
(Figure 2C).
- 7.
The right atrial anterior wall (third flap) is sutured to the pericardium.
The pulmonary venous pathway has now been completed (Figure 3A and Video
3). Figure 3B illustrates
the new systemic and pulmonary pathways created by the tunnels in the
Senning procedure.
DISCUSSION
Congenital heart surgery is technically demanding. The most significant benefit of
deliberate practice arises precisely for highly complex procedures[4,5]. The preparation of young surgeons with the current residency
programs does not allow them to gain a large experience to perform complex
operations such as the Senning procedure, due to the limitation of the surgical
exposure in the operating room. However, the naive young surgeon could be in the
challenging setting of performing this operation sooner or later[1]. The neuropsychological concept
emanating from deliberate practice has been widely investigated. It
does not represent a simple training activity; the process comprises mental
representations of the procedure, planning the action, executing the operation,
analyzing the mistakes, and carrying out the process again[4]. These learning steps need to be
always supervised by an expert senior surgeon[5]. The atrial switch simulation is an exceptional example of
the importance of wet lab training because it is possible not only to understand a
complex procedure but also to practice it reliably. One can even simulate
modifications as we did with the extension of the pericardial reflection. In
addition, the young surgeon can learn the critical steps of the procedure, such as
the site, shape, and length of the first incision, because an inappropriate cut in
the RA (first incision) could result in a lateral portion of the RA insufficient to
perform the last flap. Then there is a need to use prosthetic material. We consider
that the characteristics of the porcine RA, rather than a limitation, it’s a good
anatomical model for training this crucial step. It is a priority to have a model
with preserved lung block and pericardium because this will allow fixation of the
pericardium for better surgical exposure and a higher level of simulation. In
addition, the pericardium will be available if required at the end of the procedure.
Preservation of the pulmonary block is essential to maintain the anatomy of the
pulmonary veins and enable the procedure to be carried out. Like any complex
process, the Senning procedure must be perfectly conceptualized before its
execution, and training in the wet lab is a valuable tool for this purpose. We trust
that our images, diagram, and video will be constructive in facilitating your
understanding.
CONCLUSION
The simulation of the Senning procedure in a porcine model allows training in the wet
lab and assistances to understand the surgical principle of this complex procedure.
It is our belief this learning method can be replicated without trouble.
Glossary
CS: = Coronary sinus
CT: = Crista terminalis
IAS: = Interatrial septum
IVC: = Inferior vena cava
LA: = Left atrium
LIPV: = Left inferior pulmonary vein
lp: = Lower part
LSPV: = Left superior pulmonary vein
RA: = Right atrium
RAAW: = Right atrial anterior wall
RALW: = Right atrial lateral wall
RIPV: = Right inferior pulmonary vein
RPV: = Right pulmonary vein
RSPV: = Right superior pulmonary vein
SVC: = Superior vena cava
tp: = Top part
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is grateful for the assistance in the wet lab to Dr. Benjamin Iván
Hernández Mejía, MD, and to Dr. Zurama Yilardi Velasco Abularach, MD, for video
recording.
REFERENCES
Fraser CD. Becoming a congenital heart surgeon in the current era:
realistic expectations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(6):1496-7.
doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.054.
Barron DJ, Jones TJ, Brawn WJ. The Senning procedure as part of the
double-switch operations for congenitally corrected transposition of the great
arteries. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu.
2011;14(1):109-15. doi:10.1053/j.pcsu.2011.01.005.
Castillo Romero C, Ricciardi G. Nikaidoh procedure: the wet lab
trainee's perspective. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2021;12(1):124-7.
doi:10.1177/2150135120957644.
Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance
of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10
Suppl):S70-81. doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022.
Mavroudis CD, Mavroudis C, Jacobs JP, DeCampli WM, Tweddell JS.
Simulation and deliberate practice in a porcine model for congenital heart
surgery training. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(2):637-43.
doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.011.
Notes
Notes
No financial support.
Conflict of interest declaration
No conflict of interest.
Author notes
This study was carried out at the Department of Congenital Heart Surgery,
National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Correspondence Address: Jorge Luis Cervantes Salazar, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5317-0527, Department of Congenital
Heart Surgery, National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chávez 1 Juan Badiano
Street, Section 16, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico Zip Code: 14080 E-mail:
jorgeluis_cervantes@gmail.com