ABSTRACT:
							                           Training congenital heart surgeons today is challenging for themselves and their
					mentors. The situation becomes even more complicated while teaching complex
					surgical procedures. Senning operation is one of the most ingenious intracardiac
					techniques. We consider this surgical technique a worthy example to stand out
					the potential advantage of wet lab training. This article demonstrates the
					simulation of the Senning procedure in an explanted porcine model.
Keywords: Animal Model, Congenital Heart Disease, Pediatric.
	                            	
 
Carátula del artículo
Senning Procedure: Conceptualization in the Wet Lab
César Castillo Romero 
National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio
					Chávez, Mexico
 
Iris Pamela Flores Sarria 
National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio
					Chávez, Mexico
 
Gabriella Ricciardi 
University of Lille, France
 
Jorge Luis Cervantes Salazar jorgeluis_cervantes@gmail.com
National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio
					Chávez, Mexico
 
 
Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 38, no.  5, e20230025, 2023
Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
Received:  21 January  2023
Accepted:  16 March  2023
 
 
INTRODUCTION
 
The education of young congenital heart surgeons under current residency programs
				does not allow them to gain the necessary experience to perform complex procedures
				during their training[1]. Senning
				operation is one of the most ingenious intracardiac techniques. The atrial switch
				procedure was once frequently performed by almost all cardiac centers but recently
				it has become an uncommon surgery carried only in specialized centers undertaking
				repair of congenitally corrected transposition of the great arteries. Due to limited
				exposure and technical complexity, the Senning operation is considered a challenging
				procedure for young surgeons[2]. We
				consider this surgical technique a worthy example of the importance of deliberate
				practice in the wet lab[3,4]. This article demonstrates the
				feasibility of the Senning procedure in the porcine model and that it can be a
				useful tool to conceptualize the surgical technique. This report was approved by the
				local institutional review board. The approval included a waiver of informed consent
				because it does not show personal data of any patient.
 
TECHNIQUE
An explanted postmortem porcine heart (from a local butchery) was used. Despite the
				presence of normally related great arteries, the surgical principle of the Senning
				procedure is adequately simulated:
Fig. 1
(A) Dissection of interatrial groove and right atrial initial
									incision. Dotted lines indicate the site of the first incision.
									(B) Localization of limbic tissue. The asterisk indicates fossa
									ovalis; the dotted lines, incision to create the atrial septal
									flap; and the arrow, coronary sinus. (C) Creation of atrial
									septal flap. Dotted lines indicate the site where the flap will
									be sutured; the arrow, left pulmonary veins; and the star, the
									flap extended with a bovine pericardium patch. CT=crista
									terminalis; IVC=inferior vena cava; RA=right atrium; RIPV=right
									inferior pulmonary vein; RSPV=right superior pulmonary
									vein.
 
Fig. 2
(A) Atrial septal flap sutured. Asterisk indicates the flap
									sutured between the left pulmonary veins and the left atrial
									appendage. (B) Enlargement of the left atrium and systemic
									venous pathway completed. The asterisk indicates second flap
									suture; the star, left atrium and right pulmonary veins
									enlarged; arrows, the new pulmonary venous course; points A and
									B´, augmentation incisions and suture sites for each increased
									flap extremity; and dotted lines, the area where the anterior
									wall of the right atrium will be sutured. (C) Reconstruction of
									pulmonary venous atrium. The red arrow indicates the coping of
									edges of the right pulmonary veins to the pericardial
									reflection; the asterisk, left atrium; dotted lines, the suture
									line site for the third flap; and the black arrow, the new
									pulmonary venous pathway. CT=crista terminalis; IVC=inferior
									vena cava; RA=right atrium; SVC=superior vena cava.
 
Fig. 3
(A) Final aspect after the procedure. The arrow indicates the
									suture line of the last flap. (B) Schematic drawings of the
									Senning procedure. Upper panel shows the shift (red arrows 1, 2,
									and 3) of flaps toward the structures in which they will suture
									them. In the lower panel, the cross-sectional view shows the
									intracardiac tunnels and systemic and pulmonary pathways (black
									arrows). IAS=interatrial septum; IVC=inferior vena cava; LA=left
									atrium; LIPV=left inferior pulmonary vein; lp=lower part;
									LSPV=left superior pulmonary vein; RAAW=right atrial anterior
									wall; RALW=right atrial lateral wall; RIPV=right inferior
									pulmonary vein; RSPV=right superior pulmonary vein; SVC=superior
									vena cava; tp=top part.
 
- 1. 
      						The Waterston’s groove is dissected as deep as possible without entering the
						left atrium (LA). The right atrium (RA) is open anteriorly (5 to 10 mm) and
						parallel to the crista terminalis (Figure
							1A and Video 1). The
						distance between the atrioventricular groove and the first incision should
						correspond to approximately two-thirds of the circumference of the superior
						vena cava (SVC). The atrial septal flap (first flap) is developed (Video 2): fossa ovalis and the coronary
						sinus (CS) should be identified (Figure
							1B). Superiorly, the incision of the limbic tissue must be done
						toward and within the superior vena caval orifice, inferiorly the incision
						should be extended to the junction between the inferior vena cava (IVC) and
						the right inferior pulmonary vein (RIPV).
 
- 2. 
      						The atrial flap is extended with a small triangular patch of bovine
						pericardium (Figure 1C).
 
- 3. 
      						The atrial septal flap is sutured between the left pulmonary veins and the
						left atrial appendage. Superiorly, the flap is sutured to the junction
						between the SVC and right superior pulmonary vein, inferiorly to the
						intersection between the IVC and the RIPV (Figure 2A and Video 2).
 
- 4. 
      						The LA is enlarged by incising both right pulmonary veins (RPVs).
 
- 5. 
      						The right atrial lateral wall (second flap) is sutured along with the
						anterior remnant of the limbic tissue, staying away from the
						atrioventricular node (systemic venous pathway finished). The CS is left
						opening into the new pulmonary venous atrium (Figure 2B).
 
- 6. 
      						Reconstruction of the pulmonary venous atrium: the right atrial incision is
						extended at its ends by two anterior incisions to augment the perimeter of
						the atrial flap (points A and B in Figure
							2B). Inferiorly, the flap is sewn on the lateral aspect of the
						IVC, superiorly the suture line is put on the SVC in front of the cavoatrial
						junction. Posteriorly, pericardial reflection is used as an extension: it is
						sewn to the edges of RPVs and LA to obtain as large an opening as possible
							(Figure 2C).
 
- 7. 
      						The right atrial anterior wall (third flap) is sutured to the pericardium.
						The pulmonary venous pathway has now been completed (Figure 3A and Video
							3). Figure 3B illustrates
						the new systemic and pulmonary pathways created by the tunnels in the
						Senning procedure.
 
 
DISCUSSION
Congenital heart surgery is technically demanding. The most significant benefit of
				deliberate practice arises precisely for highly complex procedures[4,5]. The preparation of young surgeons with the current residency
				programs does not allow them to gain a large experience to perform complex
				operations such as the Senning procedure, due to the limitation of the surgical
				exposure in the operating room. However, the naive young surgeon could be in the
				challenging setting of performing this operation sooner or later[1]. The neuropsychological concept
				emanating from deliberate practice has been widely investigated. It
				does not represent a simple training activity; the process comprises mental
				representations of the procedure, planning the action, executing the operation,
				analyzing the mistakes, and carrying out the process again[4]. These learning steps need to be
				always supervised by an expert senior surgeon[5]. The atrial switch simulation is an exceptional example of
				the importance of wet lab training because it is possible not only to understand a
				complex procedure but also to practice it reliably. One can even simulate
				modifications as we did with the extension of the pericardial reflection. In
				addition, the young surgeon can learn the critical steps of the procedure, such as
				the site, shape, and length of the first incision, because an inappropriate cut in
				the RA (first incision) could result in a lateral portion of the RA insufficient to
				perform the last flap. Then there is a need to use prosthetic material. We consider
				that the characteristics of the porcine RA, rather than a limitation, it’s a good
				anatomical model for training this crucial step. It is a priority to have a model
				with preserved lung block and pericardium because this will allow fixation of the
				pericardium for better surgical exposure and a higher level of simulation. In
				addition, the pericardium will be available if required at the end of the procedure.
				Preservation of the pulmonary block is essential to maintain the anatomy of the
				pulmonary veins and enable the procedure to be carried out. Like any complex
				process, the Senning procedure must be perfectly conceptualized before its
				execution, and training in the wet lab is a valuable tool for this purpose. We trust
				that our images, diagram, and video will be constructive in facilitating your
				understanding.
 
CONCLUSION
The simulation of the Senning procedure in a porcine model allows training in the wet
				lab and assistances to understand the surgical principle of this complex procedure.
				It is our belief this learning method can be replicated without trouble.
 
Glossary
CS: = Coronary sinus
CT: = Crista terminalis
IAS: = Interatrial septum
IVC: = Inferior vena cava
LA: = Left atrium
LIPV: = Left inferior pulmonary vein
lp: = Lower part
LSPV: = Left superior pulmonary vein
RA: = Right atrium
RAAW: = Right atrial anterior wall
RALW: = Right atrial lateral wall
RIPV: = Right inferior pulmonary vein
RPV: = Right pulmonary vein
RSPV: = Right superior pulmonary vein
SVC: = Superior vena cava
tp: = Top part
 
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The author is grateful for the assistance in the wet lab to Dr. Benjamin Iván
				Hernández Mejía, MD, and to Dr. Zurama Yilardi Velasco Abularach, MD, for video
				recording.
 
 
REFERENCES
Fraser CD. Becoming a congenital heart surgeon in the current era:
					realistic expectations. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151(6):1496-7.
					doi:10.1016/j.jtcvs.2016.02.054.
Barron DJ, Jones TJ, Brawn WJ. The Senning procedure as part of the
					double-switch operations for congenitally corrected transposition of the great
					arteries. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu.
					2011;14(1):109-15. doi:10.1053/j.pcsu.2011.01.005.
Castillo Romero C, Ricciardi G. Nikaidoh procedure: the wet lab
					trainee's perspective. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2021;12(1):124-7.
					doi:10.1177/2150135120957644.
Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance
					of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med. 2004;79(10
					Suppl):S70-81. doi:10.1097/00001888-200410001-00022.
Mavroudis CD, Mavroudis C, Jacobs JP, DeCampli WM, Tweddell JS.
					Simulation and deliberate practice in a porcine model for congenital heart
					surgery training. Ann Thorac Surg. 2018;105(2):637-43.
					doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2017.10.011.
Notes 
Notes 
 
No financial support.
 
Conflict of interest declaration 
 
No conflict of interest.
 
Author notes 
 This study was carried out at the Department of Congenital Heart Surgery,
						National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chávez, Mexico City, Mexico.
Correspondence Address: Jorge Luis Cervantes Salazar, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5317-0527, Department of Congenital
					Heart Surgery, National Institute of Cardiology Ignacio Chávez 1 Juan Badiano
					Street, Section 16, Tlalpan, Mexico City, Mexico Zip Code: 14080 E-mail:
						jorgeluis_cervantes@gmail.com