Abstract: In this work, nine different biodiesels were obtained by transesterification reaction with three types of vegetable oils and three variant alcohols. The objective was to analyze them physicochemically before and after they went to the engine, to know if they had the necessary properties to act as lubricants. Subsequently, the same biodiesels were analyzed in the engine in order to observe the behavior of their dynamic viscosities, to evaluate if they were similar or superior to commercial lubricants. It was possible to note that all biodiesel produced are within the National Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels (ANP) legislation and presented as potential lubricants, due to the kinematic viscosity behavior when compared before and after the engine. These results made them possible replacements for commercial lubricants, besides having greater advantages for the engine and the environment. However, although coconut oil-derived biodiesel has good yields, it is not promising because, at temperatures below 25 °C tends to solidify, causing short, medium- and long-term engine parts wear.
Keywords:biodieselbiodiesel,enginesengines,vegetable oilsvegetable oils,performanceperformance,lubricantslubricants,transesterificationtransesterification.
Study of the properties of lubricating oils obtained from biodiesel
Received: 26 April 2019
Accepted: 18 December 2019
Published: 01 April 2020
In the last 10 years, the world’s energy consumption grew by 2.5%. Oil has been steadily falling, but it is still considered the largest primary source of used energy, although the energy consumption from renewable sources is growing. China has been reducing its energy consumption over the years, but it is still considered the most energy consuming country in the world, importing about 58% of oil. Following on the list of the world’s largest energy consumers, there are the United States, India, Germany and Brazil. Brazil is expected to grow 2.2% by the year 2040, with emphasis on renewable energies (4.5%)1. It has now become clear that the world’s perceptions about renewable energy have changed a lot and are now seen as an outlet to address some needs such as improving energy security, reducing impacts on health and the environment, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions, improving opportunities in the area of education, creation of new labor poles and poverty reduction2. Biodiesel appears as an alternative, since its main application is fuels, because it is free of aromatic compounds and sulfur, an important characteristic in the environmental sector; besides being more economically viable for stimulating agricultural production, reducing importation of oil from other countries. It can be obtained through a mixture of different esters resulting from the esterification reaction of fatty acids or transesterification of glycerides3. Several raw materials are used in the production of biodiesel, such as vegetable oils, animal fats and used frying oil. According to the National Petroleum Agency4, biodiesel produced in Brazil comes from soybean oil (76.4%), animal fat (19.8%), cotton oil (2.2%) and other vegetable oils (1.6%). In addition to using biodiesel as fuel, it can also be used as lubricant. When it acts as a lubricant, it performs much better than commercial lubricants, due to its high lubricating power, higher viscosity and less wear on the engine parts5. For the development of a lubricant, specified physicochemical properties must be obtained, such as viscosity, resistance to corrosion, total acidity index, pour point, chemiluminescence, among others. In the case of biolubricant esters which are derived from organic esters, hydrolytic, oxidative and thermal stabilities must be obtained6. The lubricating oil used in the engine must meet all lubrication needs in the different tribological pairs found in the engine7. Thus, it can be stated that the ignition quality of the fuel, the types of hydrocarbons present in the fuel and the presence of impurities or additives in it affect the performance of the engine lubricating oil. In this study, the synthesis of biodiesel from vegetable oils was proposed, as well as the analyses of their physicochemical properties to act as lubricants, evaluating the kinematic viscosity before and after the sample in the engine to verify if the performance of biodiesel as a lubricant is similar to or higher than commercial lubricants.
For the transesterification reactions, the methodology described by Geris et al.8 was used, which initially consisted of the preparation of an intermediate through the mixture of potassium hydroxide and varying alcohols, such as methanol, ethanol and isopropyl alcohol, under heating at 45 °C and constant stirring until complete dissolution of the solid. Later, the intermediate was mixed with the oils, which were also varied in the reaction as: being coconut oil, castor oil and rice oil. They were commercially purchased, and the reaction were carried out at 45 °C for 10 min. Afterwards, the biodiesel was elaborated, pouring the previous mixture and separating it through a separation funnel, isolating the biodiesel and the glycerin, and the excesses of base and alcohol. The biodiesel was treated with distilled water at 70 °C, followed by aqueous solution of hydrochloric acid 0.5% v/v until it reached neutral pH. Finally, moisture was withdrawn with anhydrous magnesium sulfate under constant stirring for 15 min. Thus, nine combinations of reactions were performed: coconut oil and methyl alcohol, castor oil and methyl alcohol, rice oil and methyl alcohol, coconut oil and ethyl alcohol, castor oil and ethyl alcohol, rice and ethyl alcohol, coconut oil and isopropyl alcohol, castor oil and isopropyl alcohol and rice oil and isopropyl alcohol.
Regarding the mass yield of biodiesel produced through the basic transesterification process, the quantity of biodiesel obtained from the ratio of 1:6 with the highest amount of oleic acid was accounted for. Yield was evaluated from the alcohol and vegetable oil used in the reaction. All reactions were performed in triplicate, as approximately 500 mL were required for further use in the engine.
The samples were assayed in a seven-stroke gasoline four-stroke engine, Manual Start - NMG70, at Univiçosa Physics Laboratory. Initially, it was necessary to use 500 mL of commercial fuel to start the engine. Subsequently, each sample was for 3 nonconsecutive h in the motor. For the engine to run, 500 mL of each synthesized biodiesel were used, according to routes previously described in the methodology. It is important to note that when below this amount, the motor does not run to rotate the sample.
All the biodiesel obtained were characterized by pH, specific mass, total acidity index, moisture content, kinematic viscosity, plus metal detection tests and infrared. All analyzes were performed in triplicate, except for the viscosity that was performed five times.
In order to characterize the biodiesel in relation to aspect and color, a preliminary analysis was carried out looking for the presence of visual impurities, such as suspended materials, sediments or any turbidity in the sample, which may be due to the presence of water. In the absence of any of these contaminants, biodiesel was classified as clear and free of impurities, according to NBR 14954 9.
The pH was measured with a pHmeter, which can present values ranging from 0 to 14, indicating acidity, neutrality or basicity of the medium. For biodiesel, the pH must be 7, that is neutral10.
To determine the specific mass, a 25 mL glass pycnometer was used. First the empty pycnometer was weighed and written down to its mass. Then it was filled with distilled water, weighed and its mass was noted. Subsequently, the clean and dry pycnometer was filled with biodiesel, being again weighed with its mass noted, according to NBR 7148/14065 11. The specific mass was calculated with Eq. 1:
To calculate the acid number, it was necessary to measure a mass of approximately 10 g of biodiesel in a 125 mL Erlenmeyer flask. A mixture of ethyl alcohol and ethyl ether in the ratio of 2:1 by volume was prepared. Subsequently, 25 mL of this mixture was added to the Erlenmeyer flask along with 3 drops of phenolphthalein. Titration of the solution was then carried out with 0.02 mol L-1 sodium hydroxide, and the blank was titrated, that is, 25 mL of the mixture of ethyl ether and ethyl alcohol together with 3 drops of phenolphthalein without the presence of biodiesel, according to NBR 14448 12. The calculation of the acid number is performed by Eq. 2:
To determine the moisture content of the biodiesel, a greenhouse, in which a mass of approximately 20 g of biodiesel was placed in the crucible free of moisture, was used and then weighed. The sample was then placed in an oven, with temperature at 100 °C for 24 h. After this time, the sample was cooled in a desiccator and the sample was weighed again until the value remained constant, thus obtaining the moisture content by the difference between the initial and final masses, through Eq. 3, according to ASTMD 6304 13.
Pi is the initial weight of the crucible with biodiesel and Pf is the final weight of the crucible with biodiesel.
The kinematic viscosity was determined with the aid of a pipette, adding 15 mL of sample to the viscometer through the ventilation tube, and waited 5-10 min to equilibrate the liquid temperature to 25 °C. With the aid of the pipettor fitted to the capillary tube, the fluid was suctioned up to above the upper measurement mark, according to NBR 104414. The kinematic viscosity can be calculated by Eq. 4:
Where ν is the kinematic viscosity of the sample (in mm² s-1), K is the viscometer constant calculated for a known fluid (in mm² s-2) and t is the average of the time the sample took to move from the measurement mark top to bottom.
For the qualitative test of metal detection, electromagnetic magnets were used. The magnets were approximated to the biodiesel samples. In case of attraction, it indicates the presence of metals and if nothing happens, absence8.
The spectra were collected in the Perkin-Elmer FT-IR 1000 spectrophotometer in the range of 4000 to 200 cm-1 in the Department of Chemistry – UFV and were made in ATR.
The biodiesel characterization was carried out from the results of some parameters, through which the quality of the biodiesel produced can be evaluated. The quality has a direct relation with the operation and the life of an engine, so it was possible to ascertain the quality of the biodiesel produced. According to National Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels regulation 25/2014 4, in order to the product obtained to be considered a biodiesel, it must comply with some rules such as: be clear and free of impurities; have neutral pH; have density, total acidity index, moisture content and kinematic viscosity within the established limits. Tables 1, 2 and 3 present the methodologies used in each parameter, the results obtained by the analysis of coconut, castor and rice biodiesel, respectively, following the limits established by the Brazilian legislation4.
For biodiesel produced from methanol, all are classified as clear and free of impurity, as specified by Brazilian legislation.4, since they have no impurities or turbidity, so biodiesel is within the cited specification. The specific mass values obtained at 20 °C for all biodiesel are within the limits of 850 to 900 kg m-³ established by NBR 7148/140654. The values were within the range required by the Brazilian legislation4, which indicates high purity of the products obtained. Considering that Resolution nº 255, dated November 15, 2003, indicates that the maximum limit of acidity index is 0.50 mg KOH g-1 of oil, so the values observed in Tab. 1 are within the allowed values, which is a good result, since an acidity index above the allowed one leads to the aging of the lubricant and it wears the parts of the motor in the long term. For the analysis of the moisture content, Eq. 3 was used, according to methodology. It can be observed that all values obtained for biodiesel from methanol, in Tab. 1, were within the limit of 0.5 mg kg-1 required by the Brazilian legislation4, which is important since the water content above the allowance impairs the property of the lubricant and oxidizes the engine parts over time. The relative specific mass is given by the specific mass of the biodiesel in relation to the specific mass of the water, both obtained experimentally. Even though a limit is not specified4, as the specific masses were within the limit, consequently, the relative specific masses are too.
In Tab. 2, it can be observed that all the biodiesels obtained through the castor oil were also clear and free of impurities. The specific masses were within the range of 850 to 900 kg m-3, indicating high purity of these products obtained by the transesterification reaction. In addition, the specific mass of a biodiesel is directly linked to the molecular structure of its molecules. The longer the carbon chain of the ester, the greater its specific mass, but the value will decrease the higher the numbers of unsaturated bonds present in the molecule. The presence of impurities may also influence the specific mass. As observed, ethanol has a higher carbon chain than methanol, so its specific mass is higher. In contrast, isopropanol has branching; consequently, there is a decrease in its specific mass, as stated by Lace et al.14. The acidity index was also within the Brazilian legislation4 limit, being less than 0.5 mg KOH g-1, with very low standard deviations, which corresponds to the accuracy of the triplicate analyzes. Regarding the moisture content, the values obtained were lower than 200 mg kg-1, indicating that all biodiesel obtained from castor oil are within the limits of the Brazilian legislation4.
Through Tab. 3, it was possible to observe that all the biodiesels obtained with isopropanol were clear and free of impurities. For the specific mass, the values were within the limit of 850 to 900 kg m-3 according to the legislation4, indicating the high purity of these obtained biodiesels. In the same way, the ethanol has greater carbonic chain than the methanol, therefore, greater specific mass; while the isopropanol has branching, then it has a lower specific mass, according to Lace et al.14. The acidity index was also within the limit of 0.5 mg KOH g-1, presenting low values, which is a good sign since it does not indicate wear of the engine parts. Regarding the moisture content, the values were within the limit of 200 mg kg-1 of the Brazilian legislation4. It is very important that the analyzes of moisture content are within the limit described by the National Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels, since, according to Lace et al.14, water promotes the hydrolysis of biodiesel resulting in free fatty acids, contributing to the proliferation of microorganisms, equipment corrosion and deposition of sediments. In addition, the presence of water contributes to the increase in acidity, which is not desired.
The yield calculation was useful to verify which vegetable oil and alcohol had the best yield in obtaining biodiesel, that is, how much was converted from reagent (vegetable oil) to product (biodiesel). Tables 4, 5 and 6 below indicate these yields:
Some studies by Nascimento, Vasconcelos and Azevedo15 show a technique of microwave optimization, leading to a yield of approximately 100%. The biodiesel obtained by means of coconut oil with isopropanol presented values higher than expected, although there are no comparisons with the literature. However, according to Geris et al.8, isopropanol is not as viable for transesterification reaction due to its higher carbon chain and greater branching when compared to the other alcohols used. Regarding biodiesel derived from coconut oil with isopropanol, the values were within the expected range, as described by Shimada et al.16, from 45 to 80%, a little lower than methanol due to its higher carbon chain, less toxic than it. Geris et al.8 showed that biodiesel obtained from methanol yields between 58 and 89%, due to the lower carbon chain that facilitates the transesterification reaction; followed by ethyl alcohol in yields between 55 and 75%, being even less toxic. The higher the carbon chains and the ramifications, the lower the yields of biodiesel due to the greater difficulty of reacting. In relation to coconut oil, for Dias, Ferraz e Almeida17 the yields with methanol are around 60 to 90%, while with ethanol, for Shimada et al.16, they vary between 45 and 80%.
Table 5 shows that the biodiesel obtained through castor oil with methanol presented good yields, according to the range of 60 to 96% specified by Dias, Ferraz e Almeida17. For biodiesel derived from castor oil with isopropanol, it is believed that the values were low as expected by the chemical explanation regarding the amount of carbonic chain and branching, as explained by Geris et al.8. The biodiesel obtained by means of castor oil with ethanol presented yield between the limit expected by Dias, Ferraz e Almeida17, from 40 to 75%. As shown in Tab. 4, yields of biodiesel obtained from coconut oil by methanol were considered as expected, since according to Dias, Ferraz e Almeida17, a yield of 60 to 90% for biodiesel from coconut oil from methanol.
Table 6 shows that biodiesel obtained from rice oil with methanol presented high values, as expected by Charoenchaitrakool and Thienmethangkoon18, from 70 to 95%. The biodiesel obtained through the rice oil with isopropanol presented low yields, but already expected according to the chemical explanation of the carbon chain, as suggested by Geris et al.8. For the biodiesel obtained by means of the rice oil with ethanol, the yields were within the expected, with highlight to the 3rd reaction with yield of 96%, higher than expected by the limit of 50 to 80% of Charoenchaitrakool and Thienmethangkoon18. In relation to the performance of biodiesel in the engine, the yield does not directly influence. However, good yields are feasible because of the amount of 500 mL needed for the lubricant to run on the engine. A low yield means having to perform a greater amount of reaction to achieve what is required for the internal combustion engine, making the process more expensive and exhausting.
It was observed that the engine maintained the correct operating temperature, since a laser thermometer was used to carry out the temperature measurements during operation, so that there was no overheating of the engine components. Also, no smoke or anomaly was observed during or after the tests. Kinematic viscosity analyzes are listed in Tab. 7, 8 and 9, both before and after each sample for 3 h. The analyses were performed in quintuplicate and the results were given by the mean. Analyzes before the engine will be called BE and after engine AE.
In Tab. 7, it was possible to observe that the biodiesel obtained through coconut oil before the engine showed satisfactory results, within the range of 3.0 to 6.0 mm² s-1 of the NBR4. Only the biodiesel obtained from coconut oil with methanol showed below-expected value, which is detrimental since lubricant that has low viscosity may not sufficiently protect engine parts, increasing parts wear, causing more friction and oxidizing faster, as explained by Farias et al.5..The viscosity values after the engine increased, but not excessively, which was expected due to the oxidation of the biodiesel in the engine.
From Tab. 8, it was possible to observe that the biodiesel obtained through castor oil was within the limits of standard legislation4, except for biodiesel from castor oil with ethanol, which presented a value above the limit of 6.0 mm² s-1. A viscosity above the limit is detrimental because some parts of the engine do not receive the necessary flux to form the lubricating film, which can result in more wear, accelerating the oxidation and shortening the life of the equipment, as explained by Farias et al.5. Regarding the biodiesel analyzed after the engine, the kinematic viscosity values increased, but not excessively, as expected.
From Tab. 9, it was possible to observe that the biodiesel derived from rice oil were within the limits of the Brazilian legislation4, except for the rice oil with ethanol that presented divergent values, well above the expected, being considered a lubricant able to wear the parts of the engine and cause oxidation in a shorter time. After the engine, the results are also as expected, with kinematic viscosity increasing. Biodiesel from coconut oil with isopropanol, castor oil with isopropanol, and rice with ethanol were not analyzed in the engine because of their low reaction yields, making it impossible to produce more due to the quantity of reagents available.
The metal detection test analyses are listed in Tabs. 10, 11 and 12 below. They were performed in triplicate and the results were given by the average.
The results obtained in Tabs. 10, 11 and 12 were satisfactory since the presence of metals could impair engine performance5. It is important to point out that this is a qualitative analysis. To be sure, it is necessary to carry out more restricted analyses, such as atomic absorption.
The major bands for biodiesel are given in Tab. 13.
From the analysis of the infrared spectra, it was possible to observe in all biodiesel the presence of bands characteristic of carbonyls (C=O), aliphatic C-H and C-O ester. According to Barbosa19, a band in the range of 1650 to 1750 cm-1 indicates axial deformation of the carbonyl C=O bond. In addition, the presence of bands between 2853 and 2854 cm-1 indicates an aliphatic C-H band; and in the range of 1390 to 1500 cm-1 correspond to ester C-O. In this case, the characteristic bands of aliphatic C-H and C=O of carbonyl correspond to the starting vegetable oil, whereas the band referring to the ester C-O bond indicates the formation of the desired product, biodiesel. In this way, the infrared appears as another way of confirming that the product (biodiesel) was obtained through the starting vegetable oil. In the absence of the ester C-O band, there would be no conversion of triacylglyceride to ester, having only the starting vegetable oil, not biodiesel. This can be observed in Fig. 1. The other spectra are not shown, since the three characteristic bands, which are the bands to emphasize in the work, are the same for all biodiesels, only occurring displacements due to the alcohol of departure of the reaction.
Nine esters (biodiesels) were synthesized from transesterification reactions, varying the vegetable oils and the starting alcohols. These biodiesels were characterized by physicochemical analyses in order to confirm their formation and the characteristic properties of biodiesel, meeting the requirements of the National Agency for Petroleum, Natural Gas and Biofuels. The biodiesel obtained also had its kinematic viscosity analyzed before and after the engine, demonstrating a similar profile to commercial engine lubricants, being good substituents. Although biodiesel produced from coconut oil has good reaction yields, it is not intended to act as lubricants in the engine as it tends to solidify at temperatures below 25 °C and can cause engine parts to wear with particle adhesion in suspension. Biodiesel derived from isopropyl alcohol is not economically viable to produce lubricants because of the poor performance to obtain it, and many reactions are necessary to obtain the necessary lubricant for the engine. However, it was observed that the majority of biodiesel obtained have promising results to act as substituents of commercial lubricants, which fill a gap in the scientific literature.
To Univiçosa – Faculty of Sciences and Technology of Viçosa, for the scholarship of undergraduate research.
andrezafalvesc@gmail.com