Abstract: It is described the use of 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine is used as coupling agent for the spectrophotometric determination of paracetamol. This method is easy and simple based on the reaction of acid hydrolysis of paracetamol to produce p-aminophenol, which in turn reacts with nitrite in acidic standard to form diazonium ion, which is coupled with coupling agent in basic standard to produce azo dyes. The formed dyes follow Beer’s law in the range of 0.8-20.5 mg mL-1 of paracetamol with 1, 3 dinitrobenzene or 0.5-18.4 mg mL-1 of paracetamol with 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine with absorption maxima at 429 nm or 430 nm. The molar absorptivity and Sandell’s sensitivity of paracetamol with 1,3 dinitrobenzene or paracetamol with 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine azo dyes were 1.965×10. L mol-1 cm-1 or 2.776×10. L mol-1 cm-1, and 7.692×10-3mg cm-2 or 5.698×10-3 mg cm-3 respectively. The dyes formed are stable for more than 12 h. The optimal reaction circumstances and other analytical parameters are evaluated. Interference due to foreign organic compounds have been studied. The method has been effectively applied to the determination of paracetamol in pharmaceutical samples.
Keywords:spectrophotometryspectrophotometry,diazotizationdiazotization,paracetamolparacetamol,p-aminophenolp-aminophenol,1, 3 dinitrobenzene1, 3 dinitrobenzene,2, 4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine2, 4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine.
Determination of paracetamol in pharmaceutical samples by spectrophotometric method
Received: 23 December 2019
Accepted: 14 February 2020
Published: 01 July 2020
Paracetamol called acetaminophen or 4-acetamidophenol, is a common pain reliever and fever reduction medicine1. Its chemical name is N-acetyl-p-aminophenol with a chemical formula C8H9NO2. Paracetamol was first prepared in 1878 by Harmon Northrop Morse an American chemist2. It is available as a generic medication with trade names including Tylenol and Panadol, among others3. It is often sold in the commercial markets with a major ingredient in many cold and flu remedial combination drugs. It is usually used either by mouth or rectally, but is also available intravenously1,4. Paracetamol is accessible in as a tablet, drops, capsules, injection, and syrup5.
Paracetamol is usually safe at suggested doses.. The suggested maximum daily dosage for an adult is 3 or 4 grams7,8. Higher doses may result in toxicity, including liver disaster. Serious skin rashes may infrequently occur, and it appears to be secure during pregnancy and breastfeeding1.
Paracetamol is also used for severe ache, such as cancer ache and ache after surgery, in combination with opioid ache medication9. Paracetamol has a highly targeted action in the brain, blocking an enzyme involved in the transmission of ache. Its mode of action was known to be different compared to other pain relievers, but although it produces pain relief throughout the body10. It is on the WHO's List of essential medicines, the most effective and safe medicines desired in a health system11.
A lot of techniques are existing in the literature for the determination of paracetamol in various types of pharmaceutical preparations. These techniques are titrimetric12, HPLC and RP-HPLC13-15, HPTLC16, Voltametric17-20, electrochemical21 and spectrophotometry10. Several spectrophotometric techniques for the determination of paracetamol are presented in the literature10,22-41.
The reagents reported for the spectrophotometric determination of paracetamol are less selective, less sensitive and some require stringent experimental conditions and are chronic toxic in nature27,33,36,38. The present research work is on spectrophotometric determination of paracetamol in pharmaceutical samples. The hydrolyzed product of paracetamol is diazotized with nitrite in acidic standard at room temperature and the diazonium salt thus shaped is coupled with 1,3 dinitrobenzene and 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine to give colored azo dye in alkaline standard is the source for the determination of paracetamol. The method has been successfully applied to the determination of paracetamol in pharmaceutical samples.
A SHIMADZU Deutschland GmbH UV-2550 spectrophotometer and a pH meter- WTW pH 330 were used.
Stock solution of paracetamol (Gift sample from Matrix Laboratory, Hyderabad, India): Weighed an amount 0.251 g of paracetamol and was dissolved in 10-15 mL of ethanol then the solution is transferred into a 250 mL standard flask, fulfilled to the mark with double distilled water (1000 µg mL-1). Working solution was prepared as required by dilution.
Sodium nitrite solution (0.5%), hydrochloric acid solution (0.5 mol L-1), 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine solution (2%), sodium hydroxide solution (2 mol L-1).
A 150 mL of 1000 μg mL-1 paracetamol solution was transferred to 250 mL round bottomed flask provided with 20 mL of 4 mol L-1 of hydrochloric acid, then refluxed for 1 h, kept aside to cool the solution, then neutralized with 20% of sodium carbonate solution, then diluted with distilled water using a 250 mL volumetric flask. A 16.6 mL of the above solution was diluted with distilled water in a 100 mL volumetric flask to prepare 100 μg mL-1 paracetamol40.
Paracetamol tablets of different trademarks were purchased from local pharmacy and were finely powdered. An accurately weighed amount of powder equivalent to 0.25 g paracetamol was dissolved in 10-12 mL ethanol, then 90-100 mL distilled water was added, mixed well to increase the solubility, filtered into 250 mL calibrated flask. Then the solution was completed to the mark with distilled water, and progress as mentioned above in preparation of hydrolyzed paracetamol solution40.
P-750: 750 mg. Apex Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. Chennai, TamilNadu, INDIA, Dolopar: 650 mg. Micro LabsLtd. Bangalore, INDIA, Disprin Paracetamol: 500 mg. Reckitt & Benckiser Ltd. Gurgaon, Haryana, INDIA, Crocin Quik: 500 mg. Glaxo Smithkline, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA, Paramet: 500 mg. Wallace Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Goa, INDIA, Nicetamol: 125 mg. Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Ltd, Hyderabad, Andra Pradesh, INDIA, Paracip 500 mg. Cipla Limited, Mumbai, Maharashtra, INDIA.
An aliquot of the solution containing paracetamol (µg mL-1) was transferred into a string of 10 mL calibrated flasks. Add 1 mL of 0.5% solution of NaNO. and 0.5 mL of 0.5 mol L-1 HCl and then the solution was mixed thoroughly and kept away for accomplishment of diazotization reaction. Then, add 1 mL of 2% 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine and 1.5 mL of 2 mol L-1 NaOH solutions and then diluted to 10 mL, using distilled water, and mixed thoroughly. Later the absorbance of the colored azo dye formed was measured at 429 nm or 430 nm beside the reagent blank.
The diazotization of paracetamol with nitrite, followed by the coupling of 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine in alkaline standard. The absorption spectra of the azo dye produced between paracetamol-1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine is presented in Fig. 1 having absorption maximum at 429 nm or 430 nm, respectively. The plot of absorbance against concentration of paracetamol coupled with 1, 3-dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine is presented in Fig. 2. The formed dyes obeys Beer’s law in the range of 0.8-20.5 mg mL-1 of paracetamol with 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 0.5-18.4 mg mL-1 of paracetamol with 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine and the reaction method is shown in Scheme 1.
The acidity effect on the diazotization reaction was considered with 2 µg mL-1 of paracetamol, in the range 0.1- 0.6 mol L-1 HCl. From the results, it can be observed that 0.5 mL of 0.5 mol L-1 HCl is the suitable concentration which gives the highest value of absorbance, for diazocouple of nitrite with 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine, beyond this range, a decrease in the absorbance was detected (Tab. 1).
The effect of the amount of different acid (weak and strong) for the diazotization of paracetamol with nitrite, followed by the coupling of 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine have been investigated. The results indicated that 0.5 mL of 0.5 mol L-1 HCl produces the highest intensity for the dye, so it has been selected in the subsequent experiments (Tab. 2). Diazotization was conceded at room temperature (25 ± 5) .C.
The color is reached maximum intensity when using 1 mL of 0.5% sodium nitrite solution using paracetamol-1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine with 2 µg mL-1 of paracetamol and adding 1 mL of 0.1-1.0% solutions of the nitrite in hydrochloric acid (0.5 mol L-1) to a series of nitrite solutions. Higher concentration did not build up the absorbance further, and at lower concentration, no good results were obtained.
1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine is used as a coupling agent was in the current procedure, by taking 2 µg mL-1 of paracetamol and adding 0.25-2.0 mL of 2% 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine to a string of nitrite solutions. It was found that utmost and firm color was obtained with 1 mL of 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine (2%) solution in an ultimate volume of 10 mL.
The experiment showed that 1.5 mL of NaOH gave utmost absorbance and 1.5 mL of 2 mol L-1 NaOH solutions was preferred for the diazotization of paracetamol with nitrite, followed by the coupling of 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine using 2 µg mL-1 of paracetamol. Other alkaline solutions were applied, but the finest results were gained by the use of NaOH solution (Tab. 3).
The results specified that the studied foreign compounds such as 1000 µg mL-1 of glucose, 800 µg mL-1 of fructose, 500 µg mL-1 of lactose, 500 µg mL-1 of starch and 200 µg mL-1 of urea do not interfere in the determination of 2 µg mL-1 of paracetamol. An error below ±2% error in the absorbance values of paracetamol at 2 µg mL-1.
By plotting absorbance beside concentration of paracetamol, a straight line is obtained in the graph. Beer’s law obeys in the range of 0.8-20.5 mg mL-1of paracetamol with 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 0.5-18.4 mg mL-1 of paracetamol with 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine. The molar absorptivity of colored system with nitrite-1,3 dinitrobenzene or nitrite-2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine were 1.965×10. L mol-1cm-1 or 2.776×10. L mol-1cm-1, and the Sandell’s sensitivity of colored system with nitrite-1,3 dinitrobenzene or nitrite-2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine were found to be 7.692×10-3mg cm-2 or 5.698×10-3 mg cm-2.
The detection limit (DL = 3.3 s / S) and quantitation limit (QL= 10 s / S) of paracetamol with 1,3 dinitrobenzene or paracetamol with 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine were found to be 0.264 mg mL‑1 and 0.80 mg mL‑1 or 0.239 mg mL-1 and 0.724 mg mL‑1 [where s = Standard Deviation, (n=5) and S = Slope of the curve] and correlation coefficient of paracetamol with 1,3 dinitrobenzene or paracetamol with 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine were 0.9991 or 0.9992.
A comparison of the current method with other spectrophotometric methods are reported for paracetamol determination (Tab. 4). As can be seen, the molar absorptivity, Sandell’s sensitivity and color stability (more than 12 h) of the proposed method are comparable or better than other reported methods. The proposed method exhibited excellent selectivity, repeatability, and ease of operation. Thus, the presented method could be of great interest especially for determination of paracetamol in routine analytical laboratories.
The current scheme was useful for the determination of paracetamol in pharmaceuticals samples. The relative standard deviation for all five samples ranged from 0.53-1.83% at 95% confidence. The percentage recoveries were found to the range from 98.20 – 100.40. The outcomes were compared with the reference method36,41 (Tab. 5). The additional ingredients present in pharmaceutical sample appearances did not form hinder.
This study demonstrated that spectrophotometric analysis is a very powerful methodology for the determination of paracetamol. For the first time 1,3 dinitrobenzene or 2,4 dinitrophenyl hydrazine is used as coupling agent for the determination of paracetamol in pharmaceutical dosage samples using an easy and simple spectrophotometric method. The proposed method has an ample range of applications with no need of heating, cooling, extraction and has high color stability (12 h). The percentage recoveries were found in the range from 98.20 – 100.40 which complete the legitimacy of the method for the analysis of paracetamol in pharmaceutical formulations. Moreover, the current method is more effective than the methods reported in the literature and has been effectively applied to the spectrophotometric analysis of determination of paracetamol in several pharmaceutical dosage samples.
Author is thankful to the department of General Studies, Yanbu Industrial College and RCYCI, Yanbu, KSA, for the constant support and encouragement.
drcpasha@gmail.com