A cross-sectional study was conducted to characterize baseline pre-academic physical fitness and explore possible age or sex differences and the age and adiposity correlates of the physical characteristics of Costa Rican police cadets. Participants completed physical fitness tests using conventional field-based performance tests recommended by NSCA (Alver et al., 2017). Therefore, the main results of the study were age, body mass (in kg), height (in cm), body mass index (BMI, in kg∙m_-2), fat mass (in both kg and %), skeletal muscle mass (in both kg and %), grip strength (in kg), lower body flexibility (in cm), vertical jump height (in cm, agility (in seconds, secs), speed (in secs), anaerobic resistance (in secs) and aerobic endurance (predicted mlO₂ °kg_-1°min_-1). All required data collection was conducted in four visits to the police academy. The signed informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to data collection and once the study protocol was reviewed by the Scientific Ethics Committee of the University of Costa Rica and approved on July 8, 2020, according to the document CEC-294-2020. All participants provided written informed consent and received a copy of their assessment of body composition for their participation.

Three hundred ninety-three recruits (age = 24.98 ± 4.65 years, weight = 72.78 ± 12.39 kg; height = 1.70 ± 0.09 m) who were enrolled in the training of the national police academy volunteered for the study. The sample was stratified by sex (men and women) and age groups (group 1: 20–29 years and group 2: 30–39 years) (Dawes et al., 2017; Lockie et al., 2018; Lockie et al., 2019; Marins et al., 2019). Before enrolling in the study, all cadets had to successfully complete a standardized physical fitness police academy test and obtain medical clearance to participate in the academy’s basic training, as inclusion criteria. Participants were recruited from four basic police training courses by an e-mail sent to the academy staff.

Demographics . Current demographic characteristics were collected using a brief survey that requested date of birth, sex, and contact information.

Physical Fitness Testing. Fitness testing was performed in weeks 1-3 basic training period of the police academy. Participants were encouraged to refrain from high intensity physical activity in the preceding 24 hours and to dress in a standard academy t-shirt and shorts and their own athletic shoes (Crawley et al., 2016). Participants refrained from eating within 2-3 hours before the testing session (Lockie et al., 2018). All tests were performed on the same day and sequenced between 8 AM and 4 PM. However, the rest intervals (~15-30 min) between the tests were not standardized due to academy-related duties included in their daily program, such as snacks and lunch times (Marins et al., 2022). The order of the assessments went from nonfatiguing (body composition, hand grip, flexibility, and VJ, agility -Illinois-test-) to maximum speed (30 m- sprint) and ended with anaerobic (300-m sprint) and aerobic (2.4-km run) endurance tests.

Anthropometrics and Body Composition . Barefoot standing height was measured to the nearest 0.1 cm using standard procedures. A multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis machine (BIA) InBody 270 (Biospace Co. Ltd, Seoul, Korea) was used for measuring body weight and full body composition. Participants were instructed to come to the laboratory station after a minimum three-hour fast and were advised to empty their bladder before measurement (Schoenfeld et al., 2020). This method has been shown to be reliable (ICC = 0.97) and valid (r = .90 for men and r = .93 for women) compared to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA]) method when used as a field test (Aandstad et al., 2014; Kukić et al., 2022. The BMI was then calculated using conventional methods.

Hand grip strength. Maximal grip strength was measured by hand dynamometry (TKK- 5401, Takei, Niigata, Japan). Before testing, the grip size was adjusted so that the middle finger, second phalanx, was at a 90-degree angle around the grip (Crawley et al., 2016). The participant held the dynamometer and gripped it with maximum possible force while holding the torso and arms straight. Participants were not allowed to shake their body or bend their elbows during the measurement. Three measurements were recorded for both the dominant and nondominant hand. The best result was used as the final result (Kim et al., 2020).

Flexibility. Lower back and hamstring flexibility was measured via a sit-and-reach test digital flex-meter box to the nearest 0.1 cm (Takei Scientific Instruments, Japan). Cadets were instructed to maintain their feet against the box without shoes and reach forward as far as they could while touching the digital flex-meter slide (Schram et al., 2020). The staff ensured that the knees remained in full extension and that the movement was carried out slowly and smoothly. The participants performed three trials, each held for 1 to 2 seconds, and the farthest reach was recorded in centimeters (Crawley et al., 2016).

Vertical jump. Two types of VJ, such as the squat jump (SJ) and the countermovement jump (CMJ) were performed on a contact platform (Fusion Sport, Queensland: Australia). Participants were instructed to jump as high as possible (Schram et al., 2018). For both jumps, a member of the research team demonstrated and instructed the technique. For the SJ, participants performed a maximal concentric VJ from an initial squat position with a knee angle of approximately 90° with hands placed on the hips (visual estimation), while for the CMJ participants first descended into the same squat position immediately followed by a rapid maximal VJ and landing back to a comfortable squat position (Gheller et al., 2015). Participants were allowed a practice jump before performing three SJ trials and three CMJ trials and the maximum was recorded (Liew et al., 2016).

Agility. The Illinois Agility Test was used as a valid assessment of agility (Raya et al., 2013). Eight cones placed 3.3 m apart were used to mark the course of the weaving component (Orr et al., 2018). Participants began the test using a three-point position behind the start line, with either or both hands on the floor (Dawes, 2019). Participants were asked to run from the starting point 10 m forward to point one on the marked course of 5m wide and continue the run between the cones comprised of a mixture of straight line running, change of direction, and weaving. After a slow completion of the course as a familiarization ans warm-up, participants were instructed to complete the test as quickly as possible (Orr et al., 2019). The course time was measured by light gates (Fusion Sport, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) recorded at the nearest 0.1 sec. The best time of three trials was considered for the analysis (Orr et al., 2018).

Speed. Participants performed three maximal 30-m sprints on a soccer pitch (artificial turf), with ~3-4 min of recovery between each trial. The warm-up protocol consisted of 5 min of low-intensity running, joint mobility, multidirectional displacements, and progressive 10- to 30-m sprints, with an overall duration of 15 min (Fink et al., 2022). The starting position was a two-point stand (i.e., both feet on the ground). The course time was measured using light gates (Fusion Sport, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) and began when each cadet crossed the first gate and ended as they crossed the finish line running as fast as physically possible (Crawley et al., 2016; Kukic et al., 2018, Fink et al., 2022). The time was recorded at the nearest 0.1 sec. The best time of three trials was considered for the analysis (Orr et al., 2018).

Anaerobic endurance . The cadets were instructed to run a 300-m distance on a predetermined course around the academy’s soccer pitch. The course was selected based on distance and minimal changes in terrain and grade (Moreno et al., 2018). Course time was measured using light gates (Fusion Sport, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia) and a test trial was allowed at maximum speed (Cocke et al., 2016).

Aerobic capacity. The 2.4 km run was performed using 6.15 rounds on a 390-m course around the academy soccer field. Cadets were instructed to start running and cover the 2.4 km distance as fast as possible. The time to complete the 2.4 km run was recorded to the nearest second with a digital smartphone stopwatch. The 2.4 km run was completed last, with approximately 30 minutes alloted between the completion of the other assessments (Cocke et al., 2016). The predictive equation applied to estimate VO_2max-in ml°kg_-1°min_-1 was 3.5 + 483 / 1.5°time in minutes (ACSM, 2018).

Two-way (age and sex) analyses of variance with Bonferroni post hoc for multiple pairwise comparisons were used to calculate the differences between age groups (20– 29-y, 30–39-y) in body composition and fitness performance outcomes. Descriptive statistics (mean ± SD) were calculated by groups for both men and women. The linear regression model was then used to explore 1) the influence of age on body composition and physical fitness and 2) BF% on fitness performance by sex. Statistical analyses were conducted using the Statical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software (version 20.0; IMB Comporation, New York, NY). Data normality was analyzed by visual inspection (e.g., histograms), tests of skewness, kurtosis, and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S).

Body composition and fitness performance were different between sexes in the present study, except for BMI and sit-and-reach test. Like in a previous study, women, except for the sit-and-reach, were commonly positioned in lower percentile ranks (Lockie et al., 2022). In the present study we found additional exceptions in women for hand grip, in contrast with Dawes et al., 2017, and agility test.

Women had approximately 66-67% of the hand grip strength, 67-68% of vertical jump height, 86-90% of agility time, 79-80% of 30-m sprint time, 65-70% of 300-m sprint time and 78-82% of VO_{2 max} of men measured in the present study. Previous studies have found similar differences in aerobic fitness (73-80%) in tactical personnel by sex (Pereira & Texeira, 2006; Marins et al., 2018). Moreover, available meta-analytic information describes higher results in tests of muscle strength (d=1.71; δ=1.81) and cardiorespiratory endurance (d=1.81; δ=2.01) in favor of men (Courtright et al., 2013).

There are several aspects that could explain the differences by sex. First, men had approximately 8% more height and 15-16% more weight than women in the present study. Weight can also be described as 27-34% less fat mass (kg) and 29-30% more SMM (kg). These results are similar to previous studies where, on average, policemen were heavier and taller than policewomen (Dawes et al., 2017). The scientific literature mentions that men have better performance due to greater proportion of type 2 fibers and higher cardiac output compared to women (Marins et al., 2018; Lockie et al., 2019).

In the present study, significant differences between age groups were found in men´s body composition except SSM (kg); while women were different only in BMI. According to literature, the negative effect of aging on the body composition of police officers has been previously reported because officers’ body fat mass tends to increase while skeletal mass decreases with age and time spent in service (Boyce et al., 2008; Ćopić et al., 2020; Kukic et al., 2019; Kukic et al., 2022). A positive correlation between adiposity and age have been reported in those police cadets and officers who are men (Orr et al., 2018) and this could explain differences founded in our study, but not for SMM. Women´s results contrast with previous studies which have described lower body composition results in policewomen under 29-years old compared to older (Kukic et al., 2022), and this could be explained because cadets in their 30s had body composition levels comparable to those in their 20s.

In our study, the fitness measures revealed significant differences by age only in the VJ tests for men, while no differences were observed in women´s fitness performance by age as expected (Dawes et al., 2017). In previous studies there were no significant differences between the 20-29 and 30-39 groups in any of the fitness tests applied (Lockie et al., 2022). However, as happened in the present study, a general decline in mean performance betwenn men´s afe groups (20-29-y vs > 30-y) in VJ has been reported (Dawes et al., 2017). The link between better jump performance with specific policing tasks such as vaulting barriers or suspect pursuit and its relationship with the reduction of illness and injury risk suring the academy period remark revalance in these results, as previous studies have described (Lockie et al., 2018).

Body composition, in terms of BF%, is negatively associated with physical fitness performance (Sporiš et al., 2011; Kukic et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2020; Dawes et al., 2016). In the current study, every 1% increase in BF% was associated with a significant reduction in agility performance, sprint, handgrip, VJ and aerobic capacity in men, while it was associated with lower performance in agility, VJ, sprint, anerobic resistance, and aerobic capacity in women. Similar findings have been reported in previous studies, indicating that officers with higher BF% had lower cardiorespiratory capacity and lower dynamic strength (Violanti et al., 2017).

In the present study, the body composition and fitness profile of police cadets have been reported to be unhealthy in many assessed characteristics. Age, sex, and BF% demonstrated to be indicators that may influence their performance. To be active and respond effectively in every occupational situation, future officers must be able to move quickly, run, push, pull, and lift and carry heavy weights while wearing a bulletproof vest and carrying communication devices, weaponry, handcuffs, and other personal protective equipment (Kim et al., 2020). Moreover, cadets must be aware of the importance of maintaining good health.

Therefore, in many studies, and after completing physical fitness tests for police officers, numerous authors support and recommend the implementation of a targeted physical fitness regimen and the resources for a program designed to improve current health and fitness, to attenuate expected decreases with aging, and aimed to optimize occupational performance with the ultimate goal of safeguarding the lifelong health and well-being of officers (Frick et al., 2024).

The current study is not without limitations. Other fitness measures were not available because of the limited time allocated by the police academy to assess personnel during daily cadets’ activities or while on duty. Furthermore, nutritional, hydration and fatigue status were not controlled nor assessed during data collection, and these may have had impact on performance (Cvorovic et al., 2021). Also, there was a limited number of cadets from both sexes in the 30-39-y samples (Dawes et al., 2017).

Previous research highlights the importance of implementing a pre-academy strength and conditioning program when there is a wide range of initial physical fitness characteristics that could be improved in potential cadets (Crawley et al., 2016). The relevance of creating specific strength and conditioning programs for women to prepare them for the training academy has also been established (Lockie et al., 2022) as they may be in disadvantage regarding power- and resistance-based activities since the beginning (Lockie et al., 2018). Traditionally, police academies have followed a militaristic approach regarding fitness conditioning (Charles, 1983). Such an approach not only may cause numerous injuries, but often could create resentment toward fitness training among the participants (Copay & Charles, 1998).

Additionally, there are some issues to account for a successful physical fitness regimen, in this case, for cadets and police officers. An important issue could be the existence of multiple barriers to the promotion of physical activity on the job, such as the low acceptability of physical activity in organization norms, the inadequacy of equipment or supervision, legal concerns and legal precedence for implementation, lack of resources, lack of knowledge, and more. Therefore, agency leaders should consider these elements when designing programs or initiatives to enhance physical fitness.

Future research and the successful implementation and maintenance of physical fitness programs should be related, in order to educate about the importance of physical fitness of police officers and how this can reflect in occupational performance, personnel safety, and therefore, the safety of the population (Marins et al. 2019). Also, the need for more structured physical training programs for police officers throughout their careers should be analyzed, to mitigate their risk of cardiovascular disease (Orr et al., 2018). In addition, the inclusion of strength and conditioning professionals, ideally with a Tactical Strength and Conditioning Facilitator certification, would seem advantageous for this unique population (Crawley et al., 2016). And finally, the effects of excessive loads carried by police (eg, ballistic vest and weapons) on the components of physical fitness should be assessed. Altogether, these steps will lead security institutions to gain a better understanding of how their equipment impacts police task performance, enabling them to tailor physical exercise programs to be aligned with the actual demands of police occupational dynamics (Marins et al., 2019).