Artículo
Received: 13 October 2021
Revised document received: 22 February 2022
Accepted: 01 April 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v70i1.48648
Abstract
Introduction: The scleractinian coral life cycle includes planktonic larvae that settle on the benthos, allowing the primary polyp to clone and build a sexually reproducing adult colony. The larval physiology and ecology of Eastern Tropical Pacific scleractinians needs the exploration of basic aspects such as the internal morphology of planulae.
Objective: To describe histological and cytological characteristics of Porites panamensis larvae.
Methods: During August-July 2019, at Islas Marias Biosphere Reserve, Central Mexican Pacific, we made 14 collections of coral larvae and identified the species with cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 gene. We used a scanning electron microscope and other techniques.
Results: The ectoderm was composed by heterogeneous, mono-ciliated, columnar epithelial cells. Nematocysts were clustered at the oral pole of the ectoderm, and cells were evident in the aboral pole of the ectoderm gland. The endoderm had secretory cells, lipids and symbionts.
Conclusions: The abundance of secretory cells and nematocysts in the aboral pole suggests their importance in substrate exploration and larval settlement. Our results support previous descriptions of larval ultrastructure in other coral species.
Key words: ultrastructure, histology, planulae, larvae biology, larvae settlement, Eastern Pacific.
Resumen
Introducción: El ciclo de vida del coral escleractinio incluye larvas planctónicas que se asientan en el bentos, lo que permite que el pólipo primario se clone y construya una colonia de adultos con reproducción sexual. La fisiología y ecología larvaria de los escleractinios del Pacífico Tropical Oriental necesita la exploración de aspectos básicos como la morfología interna de las plánulas.
Objetivo: Describir las características histológicas y citológicas de las larvas de Porites panamensis.
Métodos: Durante agosto-julio 2019, en la Reserva de la Biosfera Islas Marías, Pacífico Central Mexicano, realizamos 14 recolectas de larvas de coral e identificamos las especies con el gen citocromo oxidasa subunidad 1. Utilizamos un microscopio electrónico de barrido y otras técnicas.
Resultados: El ectodermo está compuesto por células epiteliales columnares heterogéneas, monociliadas. Los nematocistos se agrupan en el polo oral del ectodermo, mientras que en el polo aboral son visibles células glandulares. El endodermo presentó células secretoras, lípidos y simbiontes.
Conclusiones: La abundancia de células secretoras y nematocistos en el polo aboral sugiere su importancia en la exploración del sustrato y asentamiento larvario. Nuestros resultados respaldan las descripciones previas de la ultraestructura de las larvas en otras especies de coral.
Palabras clave: ultraestructura, histología, plánula, biología larval, asentamiento larval, Pacífico Oriental.
Introduction
Scleractinian coral sexual reproduction involves the fertilization of eggs that develop into swimming larvae. Upon settlement, these larvae undergo a metamorphosis with polarity reversal to develop a sessile polyp, which reproduces asexually by budding to grow into a colony with the ability to mature gametes (Fadlallah, 1983; Harrison & Wallace, 1990; Richmond, 1990; Sammarco, 1994). The larvae possess lipid vacuoles, and these serve as energy repositories that contribute to their positive buoyancy (Vandermeulen, 1974); which contributes to the maintenance of the larvae in the plankton (up to 100 days) and allow a more strict selection of the substrate (Richmond, 1987; Wilson & Harrison, 1998) and disperse to new habitats and promotes gene flow (Ayre et al., 1997).
Overall, early development involves cell division that forms a blastula and a subsequent upper and lower ectoderm excision resulting in a second tissue layer, which develops as the endoderm (Babcock & Heyward, 1986; Ball et al., 2002; Hirose & Hidaka, 2006; Okubo et al., 2013). Cilia allow planulae to swim with an oral orientation (Ball et al., 2002; Gleason & Hofmann, 2011). The aboral pole acts as a sensor for recognizing suitable settling sites (Chia et al., 1984; Vandermeulen, 1974). Larval settlement is regulated synergistically by multiple tactile and chemical cues (Gleason & Hofmann, 2011; Ritson-Williams et al., 2009), allowing an adequate selection of substrate and survival advantage of these organisms (Kitamura et al., 2007; Müller & Leitz, 2002). Even though larvae have chemoreceptors, the chemotaxis from a distance and in highly dynamic environments is not strong enough to detect an appropriate substrate, but specific factors are likely to be present directly on its surface (Müller & Leitz, 2002). Therefore, specialized cells should be a key in the detection of both chemical and mechanical forces such as compression or tension (Katta et al., 2015), and cellular structures present in the ectoderm of the aboral zone have been associated with larval settlement (Chia & Koss, 1979; Martin, 1983; Vandermeulen, 1974).
The mode and reproduction patterns of scleractinian corals are both species-specific and spatiotemporally variable (Chávez-Romo et al., 2013; Santiago-Valentín et al., 2018). At the regional level, the Eastern Tropical Pacific (ETP) environmental conditions are considered limiting for the development of coral communities (Dana, 1975; Glynn et al., 1996; Richmond, 1990). Conditions such as the wide ranges of annual temperature fluctuations (18 to 32 °C), low pH (7.72 to 8.03) (Cupul-Cortés et al., 2018), high sedimentation rates (Glynn et al., 2017), seasonal upwellings (Portela et al., 2016) and internal waves that results in abnormal daily sea temperature fluctuations (Plata & Filonov, 2007), promotes non-optimal conditions that affect physiological processes with high energy demand, such as reproduction (Glynn, 2000; Glynn & D’ Croz, 1990; Santiago-Valentín et al., 2018; Spalding et al., 2001). However, gamete development has recently been documented in all reef-building scleractinian corals examined in the region (Carpizo-Ituarte et al., 2011; Chávez-Romo & Reyes-Bonilla, 2007; Glynn et al., 1991; Glynn et al., 1994; Glynn et al., 1996; Glynn et al., 2017; López-Pérez et al., 2007; Medina-Rosas et al., 2005; Rodríguez-Troncoso et al., 2011; Santiago-Valentín et al., 2015), and even the developmental stages and morphology of the larvae within adult colonies have been described (Glynn et al., 2017; Santiago-Valentín et al., 2019).
The hermatypic coral Porites panamensis Verrill, 1866 is endemic to the ETP and, as such, displays a high tolerance to a wide range of sea surface temperature and turbidity daily and seasonal fluctuations (Halfar et al., 2005; Reyes-Bonilla et al., 2007). This species is a gonochoric brooder (Carpizo-Ituarte et al., 2011; Glynn et al., 1994; Rodríguez-Troncoso et al., 2011) and is the only one for which larvae have been found in the water column in the ETP (Santiago-Valentín et al., 2019). Considering that the survival of coral reefs given anthropogenic disturbances, including the consequences of climate change, hinges on successful recruitment, and in turn, this depends on phenotypic diversity and plasticity of larvae (Roth & Deheyn, 2013). In addition, a comprehensive understanding of coral larval morphological structures suitable for settlement provides the basis for the conservation of coral populations (Aranda et al., 2011). Hence the high relevance to characterizing P. panamensis larvae through the description of histological and cytological features of the larvae during their planktonic phase. In addition, we generate data that in the future can be compared with other cnidarian larvae; this would aid in learning about specific adaptations of settlement in corals.
Materials and methods
Coral larvae were collected in Islas Marias Biosphere Reserve (21°17’24.0” N - 106°14’24.0” W). Sampling was performed in July and August 2017, recorded period of gamete maturation for P. panamensis in the region (Carpizo-Ituarte et al., 2011; Santiago-Valentín et al., 2019). The collection of larvae was performed at noon, slowly dragging a net (30 cm diameter with a mesh size of 150 µm) in the vicinity of live coral colonies for ≈20 min covering an approximate area of 250 m2. A total of six samples per month were obtained. Samples were transported to the laboratory and separated using a dissecting microscope (Carl-Zeiss®).
Morphological and molecular identification were carried over as previously described in Santiago-Valentín et al. (2019), using the molecular marker (Cytochrome oxidase subunit I gene: COXI), amplified with PCR, using the primers: LCOI490 (5´-GGGTCAACAAATCATAAAGAYATYGG -3´) and HCOI21908 (3´- TAAACTTCAGGGTGACCAAARAAYCA -5´) (Folmer et al., 1994). Forward and reverse sequences were manually edited in order to obtain a consensus sequence using Geneious® V.4.8.5 software (Biomatters, 2010). The consensus sequences were analyzed using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). In order to determine the relationship among samples collected in other regions of Mexican Pacific and recognize the taxonomic identity of the larvae, a maximum likelihood (ML) tree with Hasegawa Kishimo Yano distances and gamma distributions was created (Kumar et al., 2016) using MEGA7®. The tree was build using, sequences from the genBank (MN005653, MN005652, MF969052, NC024182.1, KU956960.1, MN005655) and Gorgonia flabellum (GQ342418.1) was included as outgroup. The consensus sequence was deposited in the NCBI with accession number: MZ350963.
To describe the ultrastructure of the larva, each larva was individually fixed in 2.5 % glutaraldehyde in 0.2 M Millonig’s phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) and 0.14 M NaCl for 7 days, and then rinsed with phosphate buffer for 40 min; it is important to highlight that the fixation process can cause a slight shrinkage of the larvae. Post-fixation was performed in 1 % osmium tetroxide in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer, with overnight washing using the same buffer. Larvae were dehydrated using an ethanol gradation series (50, 70, 80, 95, and 100 %), with infiltration in a diluted epoxy resin for 24 h (Hayat, 1986).
Thin sections (0.5 µm) were cut on an ultra-microtome (MT-x, RMC®), mounting onto glass slides, contrasted with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and stained with toluidine blue 1 % in 0.1 M sodium borate solution at alkaline pH. Slides were first observed under Carl Zeiss AxioScope® optical microscope to assess the regionalization of structures. Electron micrographs were taken with a transmission JEOL® electron microscope (model JEM-1010) operated 60-80 kV with to resolution of 0.25 nm, and cellular structures were identified according to previous studies (Muscatine, 1974; Vandermeulen, 1974; Vandermeulen, 1975).
The total length of all planulae was determined, as well as the oral and aboral pole diameter (using photographs of larvae before the fixation process) and the length of cilia of both poles (using electron micrographs). The measures were done with the image analysis software AxioVision® (Carl Zeiss Microscopy, 2005). Data recorded are expressed as the mean ± S.D. Statistical differences in cilia length between oral and aboral poles were tested throughout t-test employing Sigma-plot V.11.
Results
Fourteen P. panamensis larvae were collected during two different sampling periods: three in July and 11 in August. The maximum likelihood tree analysis revealed that the collected larvae were clustered with P. panamensis recruits and adults of Islas Marias, Islas Marietas, and the Gulf of California (Fig. 1). The BLAST analysis showed that sequence comparisons of larvae revealed a 100 % nucleotide similarity with the species P. panamensis, which also coincides with taxonomic characteristics, concluding that the identity of the collected larvae is P. panamensis.

Larvae were fusiform in shape, and the analysis of planulae revealed typical two-layered anatomy (Fig. 2); a full ciliated translucent light brown ectoderm, and dark brown endoderm (Fig. 2A), separated by a thin acellular mesoglea (Fig. 2B). Specimens were 595.80 ± 113.57 µm in length and has an anterior pole (aboral pole; 253.84 ± 46.63 µm in diameter) that tapers to the posterior pole (oral pole; 114.97 ± 25.78 µm).

The ectoderm was densely covered by cilia and clusters of microvilli (Fig. 3A); the cilia showed a 9 + 2 axoneme arrangement associated to the apical-central region of the ectodermal cell and each possessed a vertically oriented rootlet (Fig. 3D). The cilia did not present differences in length (Student-t = 1.26, N = 10, P = 0.242) between oral (1.48 ± 0.11 µm) and aboral pole (1.48 ± 0.083 µm). The ectoderm was composed by heterogeneous, mono-ciliated, columnar epithelial cells. Nuclei were present as peripheral islands of heterochromatin situated at different “levels,” causing a pseudo-stratification of the epithelium (Fig. 3A, Fig. 3C). Mitochondria were observed as spherical and ovoid structures (Fig. 3C). The apical section of the ectoderm also showed semi-oval structures (Fig. 4A) with projections and other structures identified as viruses (Fig. 4B) (Vega-Thurber et al., 2017).


Cnidocytes encapsulating nematocysts (Fig. 5) were most commonly associated with the ectoderm of the oral pole (Fig. 3B) and two types (shapes) of nematocysts were evidenced b-mastigophores (Fig. 5A, Fig. 5B) and isorhizas (Fig. 5C, Fig. 5D).

The highest concentrations of mucus-secreting cells (mucus polysaccharides) were observed associated with the aboral pole area (Fig. 6). The secretory cells were visualized along the ectoderm and endoderm (Fig. 6A, Fig. 6B), which differed in electron-density, shape, and size (Fig. 6D). In this study, they were classified as type I and type II, following the descriptions of Martin & Thomas (1980) and Vandermeulen (1974) (Fig. 6B). Symbionts were evident in the endoderm, and few cells in the ectoderm (Fig. 6A, Fig. 6B); micro-algae cells were surrounded by complex periplasts and lipid vacuoles. Each contained nuclei bounded by a double membrane and chromosomes attached to a prominent nucleolus. In addition, these micro-algae contained single, peripheral, multi-lobed chloroplasts, as well as pyrenoids attached to the chloroplast by one to three stalks (Fig. 6C).

Discussion
The external anatomy of P. panamensis larvae share similarities with larvae of other scleractinian corals (e.g. Pocillopora damicornis in central Pacific) (Vandermeulen, 1974), Leptastrea purpurea in North Pacific (Nietzer et al., 2018), and Porites astreoides (Edmunds et al., 2001). However, differences of internal structures (e.g., the presence of symbionts, the location and development of cnidocytes, the presence of lipid vacuoles) were observed, and all are involved in their physiological performance, in response to both regional and local conditions, such as energy storage, length, and competence (pre-metamorphosis) stage. This contributes to explaining the reproductive success of P. panamensis in the region, unlike the other species present at the site (Glynn et al., 2017; López-Pérez et al., 2007; Medina-Rosas et al., 2005).
Cilia fully covered the P. panamensis larval ectoderm, with no differentiation in organization or morphology along the oral-aboral axis, the basal anatomy of the cilia is equal or similar to the majority of the cilia present in metazoan (Pitelka, 1974). The distribution of cilia in the larva allows that planulae can control over the depth, swimming actively up in a spiraling motion concerning increasing pressure even in areas with strong tidal currents (Mileikovsky, 1973; Stake & Sammarco, 2003). However, the dispersion horizontal is mostly associated with marine currents’ effect (Sammarco, 1994). Cilia provide locomotion and funciont as transductors of chemical cues (Nielsen, 1987; Nielsen 2012; Vandermeulen, 1974), influencing the dispersal and substrate selection processes, both important for larval settlement and maintenance of the population.
Two types of nematocysts were observed in the aboral pole of the planula, isorhizas, and b-mastigophores. The composition of nematocysts may vary depending on developmental stages or physiological conditions (Fautin, 1988; Fautin, 2009). The isorhizas are present in planulae but absent in adult colonies of the coral Pocillopora damicornis (Paruntu et al., 2000). Nematocysts specific (e.g isorhizas) to larvae might have functions including attachment to the substrate. When larvae detect an adequate substrate for settlement, spirocysts and isorhizas are work as a pre-attachment tool (Strömberg et al., 2019; Vandermeulen, 1974; Vandermeulen, 1975), as planulae use them as an anchoring system that latches on the substrate (Chia & Bickell, 1978). We only observed isorhizas in the collected larvae; however, the presence of spirocysts cannot be ruled out, and possibly, they develop in a more advanced stage of larva maturity or during the metamorphosis phase. The b- mastigophores has been considered as a nematocist (Mariscal, 1974), and as P. panamensis planulae is lecitotrophic and not feed during its planktonic stage, larval cnids b- mastigophores must not be used for capture prey. Thus, the b-mastigophores in planulae are expected to work as a defense system against predators, as observed in other cnidarians (Buss, 1990; Lange et al., 1992).
Also, three types of secretory cells were observed throughout the epidermis and gastrodermis. The cell mucus (mixture of polymeric glycoproteins) in the aboral epidermis they play an essential role for rapid adhesion of the coral larvae (Chia & Crawford, 1977; Vandermeulen, 1975) and, is different from the mucus in pole oral, which is characterized by its high carbohydrate content (around 80 %) (Bansil & Turner, 2006) and can also act as a stored energetic budget used during metamorphosis (Davy & Patten, 2007; Futch et al., 2010). Other secretory cells (type I, II) represent differences in the chemistry of their secretions or, are successive developmental stages of other cell types and classified as zymogen cells, which are responsible for secreting proteins (Rose & Burnett, 1968), and are located in the central region of the gastrodermis and considered as precursor cells of the specialized cells responsible for digestion in adult organisms (Haynes & Davis, 1969).
Viruses were observed in the apical zone of the epidermal cells in the larvae. Coral larvae can obtain bacteria and viruses from their progenitor, but also from the water column in early larvae and recruit stages, in fact they generally possess a far more diverse bacterial microbiomes and virus than later life stages (Van Oppen & Blackall, 2019). The viruses observed in the epidermis of the larvae apparently belong to different families including mega-virus and mini-virus (Claverie et al., 2009; Vega-Thurber et al., 2017). However, metagenomics studies are required to characterize the virus type and its possible role in early coral larvae and recruit stages.
In the gastrodermis, the presence of lipid vacuoles and symbionts was clearly evidenced. Porites panamensis larvae are non-feeding planulae lacking a mouth opening and tentacles, contrary to the planktotrophic larvae developed by spawning coral species. Contrastingly, planktonic larvae from gonochoric brooders rely on nutrients stored in their tissues, and the organic carbon traslocated through symbiosis (Muscatine & Cernichiari, 1969), and by the absorption of organics from the water column (Ben-David-Zaslow & Benayahu, 2000; Vandermeulen, 1974; Vandermeulen, 1975). The energy reserves of planulae are thus critical to their longevity and dispersal potential (Gleason & Hofmann, 2011; Harrison, 2011). Esters and triacylglycerol are the most common storage lipids in corals (Yamashiro et al., 1999); in addition, the released planulae have maternally derived endogenous lipids (up to 70 % by weight) which does not only acts as an energetic source but also contribute to the buoyancy and favors a vertical posture and displacement along the water column (Vandermeulen, 1974; Vandermeulen, 1975).
The acquisition of symbionts for P. panamensis larvae is horizontal, as they “inherit” symbiotic cells during the maturation of the oocyte (Carpizo-Ituarte et al., 2011; Rodríguez-Troncoso et al., 2011). All planktonic larvae samples evidence symbiotic cells mostly in the endoderm and, few cells in the ectoderm, later disappear from the ectoderm as the planulae matured (see Hirose et al., 2000; Hirose & Hidaka et al., 2006), as the larvae are essentially lecithotrophic upon emission and the energy translocated from the symbionts is minimal in the planulae compared with adult coral (Kopp et al., 2016).
The successful survival of larvae and the subsequent recruitment is important for the healthy maintenance of the whole community, as it contributes to population replenishment and connectivity among broadly dispersed populations. Also, the development of sensory structures is a specific key process, such as the adequate selection of substrate and its subsequent settlement, which will determine the survival of the future colony. The present study supports previous descriptions of the ultrastructure of larvae of other coral species. Structures such as secretory cells and nematocysts are abundant in the aboral pole, which suggests their importance in the substrate exploration larval settlement.
Ethical statement: the authors declare that they all agree with this publication and made significant contributions; that there is no conflict of interest of any kind; and that we followed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures and requirements. All financial sources are fully and clearly stated in the acknowledgements section. A signed document has been filed in the journal archives.
Acknowledgments
Jeimy Denisse Santiago-Valentín received a postdoctoral fellowship from Mexico’s Teacher Professional Development Program (PRODEP-NO.920007). We thank the authorities of the Islas Marias Biosphere Reserve (CONANP) and Protección y Restauración de Islas y Zonas Naturales for the logistical support and Lourdes Palma Tirado (INB-UNAM) for the processing of the TEM images. Finally, the authors thank Anderson Mayfield for providing comments on the article, as well as proofreading it.
References
Aranda, M., Banaszak, A. T., Bayer, T., Luyten, J. R., Medina, M., & Voolstra, C. R. (2011). Differential sensitivity of coral larvae to natural levels of ultraviolet radiation during the onset of larval competence. Molecular Ecology, 20, 2955-2972. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05153.x
Ayre, D. J., Hughes, T. P., & Standish, R. J. (1997). Genetic differentiation, reproductive mode, and gene flow in the brooding coral Pocillopora damicornis along the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 159, 175-187.
Babcock, R. C., & Heyward, A. J. (1986). Larval development in certain gamete-spawning scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs, 5, 111-116.
Ball, E., Hayward, D., Reece-Hoyes, J., Hislop, N., Samuel, G., Saint, R., Harrison, P. L., & Miller, D. (2002). Coral development: from classical embryology to molecular control. International Journal of Developmental Biology, 46, 671-678.
Bansil, R., & Turner, B. S. (2006). Mucin structure, aggregation, physiological functions andbiomedical applications. Current Opinion in Colloid & Interface Science, 11, 164-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cocis.2005.11.001
Ben-David-Zaslow, R., & Benayahu, Y. (2000). Biochemical composition, metabolism, and amino acid transport in planula-larvae of the soft coral Heteroxenia fuscescens. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 287, 401-412. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-010X(20001101)287:6<401::AID-JEZ1>3.0.CO;2-4
Biomatters. (2010). Geneious (version 4.8.5, software). Biomatters Ltd., Auckland, New Zealand.
Buss, L. W. (1990). Competition within and between encrusting invertebrates. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5, 352-356.
Carl Zeiss Microscopy. (2005). AxioVision (V Rel V. 2.0 for Windows). Carl Zeiss Microscopy LCC, NY, United States.
Carpizo-Ituarte, E., Vizcaíno-Ochoa, V., Chi-Barragán, G., Tapia-Vázquez, O., Cupul-Magaña, A. L., & Medina-Rosas, P. (2011). Evidence of sexual reproduction in the hermatypic corals Pocillopora damicornis, Porites panamensis, and Pavona gigantea in Banderas Bay, Mexican Pacific. Ciencias Marinas, 37, 97-112. https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v37i1.1773
Chávez-Romo, H. E., Paz-García, D. A., Correa-Sandoval, F., Reyes-Bonilla, H., López-Pérez, R. A., & Medina-Rosas, P. (2013). Diferencia en las estrategias reproductivas de dos corales escleractinios (ramificado vs masivo) a lo largo de la costa occidental de México. Ciencias Marinas, 39, 387-400. https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v39i4.2272
Chávez-Romo, H. E., & Reyes-Bonilla, H. (2007). Reproducción sexual del coral Pocillopora damicornis al sur del Golfo de California, México. Ciencias Marinas, 33, 495-501. https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v33i4.1141
Chia, F. S., Amerongen, H. M., & Peteya, D. J. (1984). Ultrastructure of the neuromuscular system of the polyp of Aurelia aurita L., 1758 (Cnidaria, Scyphozoa). Journal of Morphology, 180, 69-79.
Chia, F. S., & Bickell, L. R. (1978). Mechanisms of larval attachment and the induction of settlement and metamorphosis in coelenterates: a review. In F. S. Chia, & M. Rice (Eds.), Settlement and Metamorphosis of Marine Invertebrate Larvae (pp. 1-12). Elsevier.
Chia, F. S., & Crawford, B. (1977). Comparative fine structural studies of planulae and primary polyps of identical age of the sea pen, Ptilosarcus gurney. Journal Morphology, 151, 131-157. https://doi.org/.1002/jmor.1051510108
Chia, F. S., & Koss, R. (1979). Fine-structural studies of the nervous system and the apical organ in the planula larva of the sea-anemone Anthopleura elegantissima. Journal of Morphology, 160, 275-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1051600303
Claverie, J. M., Grzela, R., Lartigue, A., Bernadac, A., Nitsche, S., Vacelet, J., & Abergel, C. (2009). Mimivirus and Mimiviridae: giant viruses with an increasing number of potential hosts, including corals and sponges. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, 101, 172-180.
Cupul-Cortés, M., Hernández-Ayón, J. M., Cupul-Magaña, A. L., & Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P. (2018). Variabilidad del sistema de CO2en el Parque Nacional Islas Marietas (PNIM), Bahía de Banderas. Nayarit [Memoria resúmenes cortos]. IX Simposio Internacional del Carbono en México, Sonora, México. http://pmcarbono.org/pmc/simposio/2018.php
Dana, T. F. (1975). Development of contemporary Eastern Pacific coral reefs. Marine Biology, 33, 355-374. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390574
Davy, J. E., & Patten, N. L. (2007). Morphological diversity of virus-like particles within the surface microlayer of scleractinian corals. Aquatic Microbial Ecology, 47, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame047037
Edmunds, P. J., Gates, R. D. & Gleason, D. (2001). The biology of larvae from the reef coral Porites astreoides, and their response to temperature disturbances. Marine Biology, 139, 981-989
Fadlallah, Y. H. (1983). Sexual reproduction, development and larval biology in scleractinian corals. Coral Reefs, 2, 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00336720
Fautin, D. G. (1988). Importance of nematocysts to actinian taxonomy. In D. A. Hessinger, & H. M. Lenhoff (Eds.), The Biology of Nematocysts (pp. 487-500). Academic Press.
Fautin, D. G. (2009). Structural diversity, systematics, and evolution of cnidae. Toxicon, 54(8), 1054-1064. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxicon.2009.02.024
Folmer, O., Black, M., Hoeh, W., Lutz, R., & Vrijenhoek, R. (1994). DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular Marine Biology and Biotechnology, 3, 294-299.
Futch, J. C., Griffin, D. W., & Lipp, E. K. (2010). Human enteric viruses in groundwater indicate off shore transport of human sewage to coral reefs of the Upper Florida Keys. Environmental Microbiology, 12, 964-974. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02141.x
Gleason, D. F., & Hofmann, D. K. (2011). Coral larvae: From gametes to recruits. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 408, 42-57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2011.07.025
Glynn, P. W. (2000). El Niño-Southern Oscillation mass mortalities of reef corals: a model of high temperature marine extinctions? Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 178(1), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1144/GSL.SP.2000.178.01.09
Glynn, P. W., Colley, S. B., Carpizo-Ituarte, E., & Richmond, R. H. (2017). Coral reproduction in the Eastern Pacific. In P. W. Glynn, D. P. Manzello, & I. C. Enochs (Eds.), Coral reefs of the Eastern Tropical Pacific: persistence and loss in a dynamic environment, (pp. 435-476). Coral Reefs of the World 8, Springer.
Glynn, P. W., Colley, S. B., Eakin, C. M., Smith, D. B., Cortés, J., Gassman, N. J., Guzmán, H. M., del Rosario, J. B., & Feingold, J. S. (1994). Reef coral reproduction in the Eastern Pacific: Costa Rica, Panamá, and Galápagos Islands (Ecuador). II. Poritidae. Marine Biology, 118, 191-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00349785
Glynn, P. W., Colley, S. B., Gassman, N. J., Black, K., Cortés, J., & Maté, J. L. (1996). Reef coral reproduction in the eastern Pacific: Costa Rica, Panamá, and Galapagos Islands (Ecuador). III. Agariciidae (Pavona gigantea and Gardineroseris planulata). Marine Biology, 125, 579-601. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353270
Glynn, P. W. & D’croz, L. (1990). Experimental evidence for high temperature stress as the cause of El Niño-coincident coral mortality. Coral Reefs, 8(4), 181-191.
Glynn, P. W., Gassman, N. J., Eakin, C. M., Cortes, J., Smith, D. B., & Guzman, H. M. (1991). Reef coral reproduction in the Eastern Pacific: Costa Rica, Panamá, and Galapagos islands (Ecuador). Marine Biology, 109, 355-368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01313501
Halfar, J., Godinez-Orta, L., Riegl, B., Valdez-Holguin, J. E., & Borges, J. M. (2005). Living on the edge: high-latitude Porites carbonate production under temperate eutrophic conditions. Coral Reefs, 24, 582-592. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00338-005-0029-x
Harrison, P. L. (2011). Sexual reproduction of scleractinian corals. In Z. Dubinsky, & N. Stambler (Eds), Coral Reefs: An Ecosystem in Transition (pp 59-85). Springer.
Harrison, P. L., & Wallace, C. C. (1990). Reproduction, dispersal and recruitment of scleractinian corals: comparisons among the Caribbean, the Tropical Pacific, and the Red Sea. Marine Ecology Progres Series, 60, 185-203.
Hayat, M. A. (1986). Glutaraldehyde: role in electron microscopy. Micron and Microscopica Acta, 17, 115-135.
Haynes, J. F., & Davis, L. E. (1969). The ultrastructure of the zymogen cells in Hydra viridis. Zeitschrift für Zellforschung und Mikroskopische Anatomie, 100, 316-324.
Hirose, M., & Hidaka, M. (2006). Early development of zooxanthella-containing eggs of the corals Porites cylindrica and Montipora digitata: The endodermal localization of zooxanthellae. Zoology Science, 23, 873-881. https://doi.org/10.2307/1542708
Hirose, M., Kinzie, R. A., & Hidaka, M. (2000). Early development of zooxanthella-containing eggs of the corals Pocillopora verrucosa and P. eydouxi with special reference to the distribution of zooxanthellae. Biology Bulletin, 199(1), 68-75.
Katta, S., Krieg, M., & Goodman, M. B. (2015). Feeling force: physical and physiological principles enabling sensory mechanotransduction. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 31, 347-371. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio- 100913-013426
Kitamura, M., Koyama, T., Nakano, Y., & Uemura, D. (2007). Characterization of a natural inducer of coral larval metamorphosis. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 340(1), 96-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2006.08.012
Kopp, C., Domart-Coulon, I., Barthelemy, D., & Meibom, A. (2016). Nutritional input from dinoflagellate symbionts in reef-building corals is minimal during planula larval life stage. Science Advances, 2(3), e1500681. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500681
Kumar, S., Stecher, G., & Tamura, K. (2016). MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology Evolution, 33(7), 1870-1874. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msw054
Lange, R. G., Dick, M. H., & Müller, W. A. (1992). Specificity and early ontogeny of historecognition in the hydroid Hydractinia. Journal of Experimental Zoology, 262, 307-316.
López-Pérez, R. A., Mora-Pérez, M. G., & Leyte-Morales, G. E. (2007). Coral (Anthozoa: Scleractinia) recruitment at Bahías de Huatulco, Western Mexico: implications for coral community structure and dynamics. Pacific Science, 61, 355-369. https://doi.org/10.2984/1534-6188(2007)61[355:CASRAB]2.0.CO;2
Mariscal, R. N. (1974). Nematocysts. In L. Muscatine, & H. M. Lenhoff (Eds.), Coelenterate biology: Reviews and new perspectives (pp 129-178). Academic Press.
Martin, V. J. (1983). A fine structural study of metamorphosis of the hydrozoan Mitrocomella polydiademata. Journal of Morphology, 176, 261-287.
Martin, V. J., & Thomas, M. B. (1980). Nerve elements in the planula of the hydrozoan Pennaria tiarella. Journal of Morphology, 66, 27-36.
Medina-Rosas, P., Carriquiry, J., & Cupul-Magaña, A. L. (2005). Recruitment of Porites (Scleractinia) on artificial substrate in reefs affected by the 1997-98 El Niño in Banderas Bay, Mexican Pacific. Ciencias Marinas, 31(1A), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.7773/cm.v31i11.75
Mileikovsky, S. (1973). Speed of active movement of pelagic larvae of marine bottom invertebrates and their ability to regulate their vertical position. Marine Biology, 23 , 11-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00394107
Müller, W. A., & Leitz, T. (2002). Metamorphosis in the Cnidaria. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 80(10), 1755-1771.
Muscatine, L. (1974). Endosymbiosis of cnidarians and algae. In L. Muscatine, & H. M. Lenhoff (Eds.), Coelenterate biology: reviews and new perspectives (pp. 359-395 pp). Academic Press.
Muscatine, L., & Cernichiari, E. (1969). Assimilation of photosynthetic products of zooxanthellae by a reef coral. The Biological Bulletin, 137(3), 506-523. https://doi.org/10.2307/1540172
Nielsen, C. (1987). Structure and function of metazoan ciliary bands and their phylogenetic significance. Acta Zoologica, 68, 205-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.1987.tb00892.x
Nielsen, C. (2012). Animal evolution interrelationships of the living phyla (3rd Ed). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/ict005
Nietzer, S., Moeller, M., Kitamura, M., & Schupp, P. J. (2018). Coral larvae every day: Leptastrea purpurea, a brooding species that could accelerate coral research. Frontiers in Marine Science, 466 (5), 1-12.
Okubo, N., Mezaki, T., Nozawa, Y., Nakano, Y., Lien, Y. T., Fukami, H., Hayward, D. C., & Ball, E. E. (2013). Comparative embryology of eleven species of stony corals (Scleractinia). PLoS One, 8(12), e84115. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084115
Paruntu, C. P., Hidaka, K., & Hidaka, M. (2000). Developmental changes in cnida composition of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Journal of the Japanese Coral Reef Society, 2000(2), 23-28.
Pitelka, D. R. (1974). Basal bodies and root structures. In M. A. Sleigh (Ed.), Cilia and Flagella (pp. 437-469). Academic Press.
Plata, L. & Filonov, A. (2007). Marea interna en la parte noroeste de la Bahía de Banderas, México. Ciencias Marinas, 33(2), 197-215.
Portela, W., Beier, E., Barton, E. D., Castro, R., Godínez, V., Palacios-Hernández, E., Fiedler, P. C., Sánchez-Velazco, L., & Trasviña, A. (2016). Water masses and circulation in the Tropical Pacific off Central Mexico and surrounding areas. Journal Physiology Oceanografia, 46(10), 3069-3081.
Reyes-Bonilla, H., González-Romero, S., Cruz-Piñón, G., & Calderón-Aguilera, L. E. (2007). Corales pétreos. In G. D. Danemann, & E. Ezcurra (Eds.), Bahía de los Ángeles: recursos naturales y comunidad. Línea Base 2007 (pp. 291-318). Pronatura Noreste AC.
Richmond, R. H. (1987). Energetics, competency, and long-distance dispersal of planula larvae of the coral Pocillopora damicornis. Marine Biology, 93, 527-533.
Richmond, R. H. (1990). Reproduction and recruitment in corals: critical links in the persistence of reefs. In C. Birkeland (Ed.), Life and death of coral reefs (pp. 175-197). Chapman and Hall. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-5995-5_8
Ritson-Williams, R., Arnold, S. N., Fogarty, N. D., Steneck, R. S., Vermeij, M., & Paul, V. J. (2009). New perspectives on ecological mechanisms affecting coral recruitment on reefs. Smithson Contribution Marine Sciences, 38, 437-457.
Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P., Carpizo-Ituarte, E., Leyte-Morales, G. E., Chi-Barragán, G., & Tapia-Vázquez, O. (2011). Sexual reproduction of three coral species from the Mexican South Pacific. Marine Biology, 158(12), 2673-2683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00227-011-1765-9
Rose, P. G., & Burnett, A. L. (1968). An electron microscopic and histochemical study of the secretory cells in Hydra viridis. Wilhelm Roux’Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen, 161(4), 281-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00576681
Roth, M. S., & Deheyn, D. D. (2013). Effects of cold stress and heat stress on coral fluorescence in reef-building corals. Scientific Reports, 3(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01421
Sammarco, P. W. (1994). Larval dispersal and recruitment processes in Great Barrier Reef corals: analysis and synthesis. In P. W., Sammarco, & M. L. Heron (Eds.), The Bio-Physics of Marine Larval Dispersal (pp. 35-72). American Geophysical Union.
Santiago-Valentín, J. D., Colley, S. B., Glynn, P. W., Cupul-Magaña, A. L., López-Pérez, R. A., Rodríguez-Zaragoza, F. A., Benítez-Villalobos, F., Bautista-Guerrero, E., Zavala-Casas, D. A., & Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P. (2018). Regional and species specific sexual reproductive patterns of three zooxanthellate scleractinian corals across the Eastern Tropical Pacific. Marine Ecology, 39(2), e12497. https://doi.org/10.1111/maec.12497
Santiago-Valentín, J. D., Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P., Bautista-Guerrero, E., López-Pérez, A., & Cupul-Magaña, A. L. (2019). Successful sexual reproduction of the scleractinian coral Porites panamensis: Evidence of planktonic larvae and recruitment. Invertebrate Biology, 138(1), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/ivb.12235
Santiago-Valentín, J. D., Rodríguez-Troncoso, A. P., Carpizo-Ituarte, E., Benítez-Villalobos, F., Torres-Hernández, P., & López-Pérez, A. (2015). Reproductive pattern of the reef-building coral Pavona gigantea (Scleractinia: Agariciidae) off Southwestern Mexico. Ciencias Marinas, 41(3), 233-246.
Spalding, M. D., Ravilious, C. & Green, E. P. (2001). World atlas of coral reefs. University of California Press.
Stake, J. L., & Sammarco, P. W. (2003). Effects of pressure on swimming behavior in planula larvae of the coral Porites astreoides (Cnidaria, Scleractinia). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 288(2), 181-201.
Strömberg, S. M., Östman, C., & Larsson, A. I. (2019). The cnidome and ultrastructural morphology of late planulae in Lophelia pertusa (Linnaeus, 1758) with implications for settling competency. Acta Zoologica, 100(4), 431-450. https://doi. org/10.1111/azo.12296
Van Oppen, M. J., & Blackall, L. L. (2019). Coral microbiome dynamics, functions and design in a changing world. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 17(9), 557-567. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0223-4DO
Vandermeulen, J. H. (1974). Studies on reef corals. II Fine structure of planktonic planula larva of Pocillopora damicornis, with emphasis on the aboral epidermis. Marine Biology, 27, 239-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00391949
Vandermeulen, J. H. (1975). Studies on reef corals. III. Fine structural changes of calicoblast cells in Pocillopora damicornis during settling and calcification. Marine Biology, 31, 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00390649
Vega-Thurber, R., Payet, J. P., Thurber, A. R., & Correa, A. M. S. (2017). Virus-host interactions and their 522 roles in coral reef health and disease. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 15, 205-216. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.176
Wilson, J. R. & Harrison, P. L. (1998). Settlement-competency periods of larvae of three species of scleractinian corals. Marine Biology, 131, 339-345.
Yamashiro, H., Oku, H., Higa, H., Chinen, I., & Sakai, K. (1999). Composition of lipids, fatty acids and sterols in Okinawan corals. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, 122, 397-407.