Analysis of congenital syphilis in northeastern Brazil
Análise da sífilis congênita no nordeste do Brasil
Análisis de la sífilis congénita en el noreste de Brasil
Analysis of congenital syphilis in northeastern Brazil
Revista de Epidemiologia e Controle de Infecção, vol. 11, núm. 2, pp. 117-122, 2021
Universidade de Santa Cruz do Sul

Recepción: 12 Enero 2020
Aprobación: 26 Marzo 2021
Abstract: Justification and Objective: in Brazil, there was an increase in vertical transmission, making congenital syphilis a public health problem. In recent years, there has been an increase in syphilis cases in the five regions of Brazil, with the Northeast and Southeast regions standing out with the highest number of cases. Therefore, this study aimed to describe the epidemiological profile of congenital syphilis in Northeastern Brazil. Methods: this is a retrospective, descriptive and quantitative study based on a survey of sociodemographic, clinical and death variables in the Notifiable Diseases Information System, covering the period from 2014 to 2018. Descriptive statistics were used. Results: Pernambuco had the highest number of cases (25.2%), with a gradual increase in incidence. In 2018, the detection rate was 9.6/1,000 live births. A growing trend was observed in the number of deaths from congenital syphilis from 2014 to 2018. There was a predominance of pregnant women aged between 20 and 29 years (52.0%), with low education (31.3%) and mixed-race (77.1%). Most infected pregnant women underwent prenatal care (79.8%), but with an inadequate treatment regimen (59.2%) as well as without the partner’s treatment (59.5%). Conclusion: congenital syphilis is growing in northeastern Brazil, accompanied by inadequate prenatal care. This highlights the importance of new approaches in health, with the purpose of training professionals, especially in Primary Health Care for prevention, screening and effective treatment of syphilis in pregnant women.
Keywords: Syphilis, Congenital. Infant, Newborn. Health Profile..
INTRODUCTION
Syphilis is an infectious disease caused by a spirochete bacterium, named Treponema pallidum, transmitted mainly by sexual contact, which presents a variety of clinical manifestations with chronic evolution, and may be asymptomatic in some stages.1,2
In congenital syphilis (CS) transmission of treponemas often occurs transplacentally, and may occur during childbirth3. About 80% of pregnancies, in which the mother has syphilis, have adverse outcomes such as prematurity, low birth weight, congenital infection and fetal and neonatal death. Hutchinson’s triad, composed of dental malformations, interstitial keratitis and sensorineural deafness, caused by damage to the VIII cranial nerve, constitute the CS triad4.
In recent years, there has been an increase in CS cases in the five regions of Brazil, highlighting the Northeast and Southeast regions with the highest number of cases, recording rates ranging from 2.7 to 6.9/1000 live births5. The continuous growth of CS cases is associated with the challenge of timely diagnosis and follow-up of cases, although it is a preventable and treatable disease6.
Timely and adequate care is one of the barriers to vertical transmission of syphilis. Therefore, one of the main risk factors for CS is inadequate prenatal care, which should be tracked from the first consultations and provide early and immediate treatment for pregnant women and partner, as determined by the Ministry of Health recommendations6.
Existing inequalities in access to health, whether regional or social, in addition to other failures resulting from poor care, such as inadequate information provided by the health care team, misinterpretation of syphilis tests and non-recognition of maternal signs of syphilis contribute to CS persisting across the country7. Thus, CS is a public health problem, in which case control is directly related to the quality of health services offered to pregnant women8.
Therefore, improvements in the implementation of health services for pregnant women with syphilis can be monitored through the frequent analysis of CS cases. Therefore, this study aims to describe the epidemiological profile of CS in northeastern Brazil.
METHODS
This is a retrospective, descriptive and quantitative study, carried out from secondary data from the Notifiable Diseases Information System (SINAN - Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação), from the website of the Department of Informatics of the Unified Health System (DATASUS - Sistema de Informação de Agravos de Notificação). The Northeast Region of Brazil was adopted as the study site, as it has the largest number of states (Alagoas, Ceará, Maranhão, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Piauí, Rio Grande do Norte and Sergipe) in relation to other Brazilian regions, with an approximate area of 1.5 million km. and 57 million inhabitants9 .
The population consisted of all confirmed CS cases in children under one year of age, from 2014 to 2018. This time frame was adopted, as this period is fully available for analysis in DATASUS.
Data collection took place in August 2020, by one of the authors of the study. Then, they were grouped in Microsoft Excel., in which descriptive statistical analysis (absolute and relative frequency) was performed. It is noteworthy that the incidence rate and gross mortality coefficient per year are already calculated in DATASUS.
The variables considered were: number of cases and deaths from CS in children under one year of age; syphilis cases by state and year of diagnosis; child’s age group; classification of the final diagnosis; age group, race and maternal education; prenatal care; maternal treatment scheme; and performing the partner’s treatment.
This study was not submitted to the Institutional Review Board, as it uses secondary data, available on a public platform and online. Despite this, the ethical principles of Resolutions 466, of December 12, 2012, and 510, of April 7, 2016, of the National Health Council, of the Ministry of Health of Brazil, were respected.
RESULTS
In the time frame from 2014 to 2018, there was a prevalence of cases in the state of Pernambuco (25.2%), with a gradual increase in incidence, followed by Bahia (20.0%) and Ceará (19.0%) (Table 1).
| State | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Total | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Alagoas | 413 | 8.1 | 385 | 6.4 | 320 | 5.4 | 343 | 4.9 | 440 | 5.6 | 1,901 | 6.0 |
| Bahia | 920 | 18.1 | 1,166 | 19.4 | 1,386 | 23.4 | 1,369 | 19.7 | 1,517 | 19.3 | 6,358 | 20.0 |
| Ceará | 1,091 | 21.5 | 1,147 | 19.1 | 1,146 | 19.3 | 1,300 | 18.7 | 1,350 | 17.1 | 6,034 | 19.0 |
| Maranhão | 293 | 5.8 | 431 | 7.2 | 440 | 7.4 | 427 | 6.1 | 842 | 10.7 | 2,433 | 7.6 |
| Paraíba | 252 | 5.0 | 318 | 5.3 | 85 | 1.4 | 393 | 5.7 | 383 | 4.9 | 1,431 | 4.5 |
| Pernambuco | 1,285 | 25.3 | 1,359 | 22.6 | 1,517 | 25.6 | 1,920 | 27.6 | 1,941 | 24.6 | 8,022 | 25.2 |
| Piauí | 156 | 3.1 | 394 | 6.6 | 377 | 6.4 | 433 | 6.2 | 498 | 6.3 | 1,858 | 5.8 |
| Rio Grande do Norte | 283 | 5.6 | 436 | 7.3 | 352 | 5.9 | 451 | 6.5 | 579 | 7.4 | 2,101 | 6.6 |
| Sergipe | 380 | 7.5 | 368 | 6.1 | 312 | 5.2 | 316 | 4.6 | 327 | 4.1 | 1,703 | 5.3 |
In 2018, there was a significant increase in CS with a rate of 9.6 cases per 1,000 live births, when compared to previous years, accompanied by the increasing number of deaths, reaching the gross mortality rate of 9.4 per 100,000 live births in the same period (Table 2).
| Variable | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 |
| Congenital syphilis cases | 5,073 | 6,004 | 5,935 | 6,952 | 7,877 |
| Detection rate per 1,000 live births | 6.1 | 7.1 | 7.5 | 8.5 | 9.6 |
| Deaths from congenital syphilis | 48 | 54 | 66 | 57 | 77 |
| Gross mortality coefficient per 100,000 live births | 5.8 | 6.4 | 8.3 | 7.0 | 9.4 |
In all years analyzed, there was a predominance of early CS. Maternal age ranged from 20 to 29 years (52.0%), and education between incomplete 5th and 8th grades (31.3%) and mixed color/race (77.1%). It was verified that women underwent prenatal follow-up (79.8%), with inadequate maternal treatment regimen (59.2%) as well as without treatment of their partner (59.5%) (Table 3).
| Variable | 2014 | 2015 | 2016 | 2017 | 2018 | Total | ||||||
| n | % | n | % | N | % | N | % | n | % | n | % | |
| Child age | ||||||||||||
| < 7 days | 4.894 | 96.5 | 5.812 | 96.8 | 5.706 | 96.1 | 6.703 | 96.4 | 7.599 | 96.5 | 30.714 | 96.5 |
| 7 to 27 days | 88 | 1.7 | 94 | 1.6 | 113 | 1.9 | 129 | 1.9 | 172 | 2.2 | 596 | 1.9 |
| 28 to 364 days | 91 | 1.8 | 98 | 1.6 | 116 | 2.0 | 120 | 1.7 | 106 | 1.3 | 531 | 1.7 |
| Final diagnosis | ||||||||||||
| Early CS | 4.682 | 92.1 | 5.585 | 92.6 | 5.575 | 93.6 | 6.565 | 94.1 | 7.494 | 94.9 | 29.901 | 93.6 |
| Late CS | 7 | 0.1 | 17 | 0.3 | 12 | 0.2 | 10 | 0.1 | 13 | 0.2 | 59 | 0.2 |
| Abortion | 176 | 3.5 | 179 | 3.0 | 175 | 2.9 | 193 | 2.8 | 190 | 2.4 | 913 | 2.9 |
| Stillbirth | 219 | 4.3 | 249 | 4.1 | 192 | 3.2 | 206 | 3.0 | 203 | 2.6 | 1.069 | 3.3 |
| Maternal age group | ||||||||||||
| 10 to 14 years | 58 | 1.2 | 72 | 1.2 | 76 | 1.3 | 83 | 1.2 | 67 | 0.9 | 356 | 1.1 |
| 15 to 19 years | 1.185 | 23.3 | 1.412 | 23.4 | 1.361 | 22.9 | 1.656 | 23.7 | 1.869 | 23.7 | 7.483 | 23.5 |
| 20 to 29 years | 2.654 | 52.2 | 3.075 | 51.0 | 3.113 | 52.3 | 3.655 | 52.4 | 4.125 | 52.2 | 16.622 | 52.0 |
| 30 to 39 years | 998 | 19.6 | 1.161 | 19.3 | 1.144 | 19.2 | 1.307 | 18.8 | 1.496 | 18.9 | 6.106 | 19.1 |
| 40 years and older | 91 | 1.8 | 121 | 2.0 | 125 | 2.1 | 149 | 2.1 | 152 | 1.9 | 638 | 2.0 |
| Ignored | 98 | 1.9 | 189 | 3.1 | 135 | 2.2 | 124 | 1.8 | 191 | 2.4 | 737 | 2.3 |
| Maternal education | ||||||||||||
| Illiterate | 77 | 1.5 | 84 | 1.4 | 81 | 1.4 | 68 | 1.0 | 74 | 0.9 | 384 | 1.2 |
| Incomplete 1st to 4th grades | 579 | 11.4 | 515 | 8.5 | 461 | 7.7 | 559 | 8.0 | 553 | 7.0 | 2.667 | 8.4 |
| Complete 4th grade | 238 | 4.7 | 257 | 4.3 | 264 | 4.4 | 261 | 3.7 | 297 | 3.8 | 1.317 | 4.1 |
| Incomplete 5th to 8th grades | 1.637 | 32.2 | 1.938 | 32.1 | 1.864 | 31.3 | 2.150 | 30.8 | 2.418 | 30.6 | 10.007 | 31.3 |
| Complete elementary school | 314 | 6.2 | 501 | 8.3 | 408 | 6.9 | 558 | 8.0 | 638 | 8.1 | 2419 | 7.6 |
| Incomplete high school | 471 | 9.2 | 549 | 9.1 | 661 | 11.1 | 829 | 11.9 | 936 | 11.8 | 3.446 | 10.8 |
| Complete high school | 544 | 10.7 | 723 | 12.0 | 829 | 13.9 | 972 | 13.9 | 1.323 | 16.8 | 4.391 | 13.7 |
| Incomplete higher education | 35 | 0.7 | 37 | 0.6 | 57 | 1.0 | 59 | 0.9 | 70 | 0.9 | 258 | 0.8 |
| Complete higher education | 19 | 0.4 | 36 | 0.6 | 29 | 0.5 | 54 | 0.8 | 65 | 0.8 | 203 | 0.6 |
| Not applicable | 32 | 0.6 | 28 | 0.5 | 30 | 0.5 | 35 | 0.5 | 22 | 0.3 | 147 | 0.5 |
| Ignored | 1.138 | 22.4 | 1.362 | 22.6 | 1.270 | 21.3 | 1.429 | 20.5 | 1.504 | 19 | 6.703 | 21.0 |
| Maternal race/color | ||||||||||||
| White | 367 | 7.2 | 519 | 8.6 | 472 | 7.9 | 545 | 7.8 | 638 | 8.0 | 2.541 | 8.0 |
| Black | 349 | 6.9 | 390 | 6.5 | 474 | 8.0 | 484 | 6.9 | 529 | 6.7 | 2.226 | 7.0 |
| Yellow | 19 | 0.4 | 14 | 0.2 | 27 | 0.5 | 32 | 0.5 | 38 | 0.5 | 130 | 0.4 |
| Mixed-race | 3.985 | 78.4 | 4.678 | 77.6 | 4.496 | 75.5 | 5.401 | 77.4 | 6.082 | 77.0 | 24.642 | 77.1 |
| Indigenous | 7 | 0.1 | 5 | 0.1 | 14 | 0.2 | 13 | 0.2 | 14 | 0.2 | 53 | 0.2 |
| Ignored | 357 | 7.0 | 424 | 7.0 | 471 | 7.9 | 499 | 7.2 | 599 | 7.6 | 2.350 | 7.3 |
| Prenatal care | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 3.895 | 76.6 | 4.652 | 77.1 | 4.782 | 80.3 | 5.640 | 80.9 | 6.508 | 82.4 | 25.477 | 79.8 |
| No | 824 | 16.2 | 865 | 14.3 | 770 | 12.9 | 864 | 12.4 | 927 | 11.7 | 4.250 | 13.3 |
| Ignored | 365 | 7.2 | 513 | 8.5 | 402 | 6.8 | 470 | 6.7 | 465 | 5.9 | 2.215 | 6.9 |
| Treatment schemeMaternal | ||||||||||||
| Adequate | 153 | 3.0 | 178 | 2.9 | 162 | 2.7 | 235 | 3.4 | 309 | 3.9 | 1.037 | 3.2 |
| Inadequate | 3.021 | 59.4 | 3.550 | 58.9 | 3.666 | 61.6 | 4.097 | 58.7 | 4.586 | 58.0 | 18.920 | 59.2 |
| Not performed | 1.287 | 25.3 | 1.535 | 25.5 | 1.490 | 25.0 | 1.811 | 26.0 | 1.949 | 24.7 | 8.072 | 25.3 |
| Ignored | 623 | 12.3 | 767 | 12.7 | 636 | 10.7 | 831 | 11.9 | 1.056 | 13.4 | 3.913 | 12.3 |
| Partnertreated | ||||||||||||
| Yes | 683 | 13.4 | 738 | 12.2 | 775 | 13.0 | 1.085 | 15.6 | 1.979 | 25.1 | 5.260 | 16.5 |
| No | 3.182 | 62.6 | 3.798 | 63.0 | 3.792 | 63.7 | 4.198 | 60.2 | 4.048 | 51.2 | 19.018 | 59.5 |
| Ignored | 1.219 | 24.0 | 1.494 | 24.8 | 1.387 | 23.3 | 1.691 | 24.2 | 1.873 | 23.7 | 7.664 | 24.0 |
DISCUSSION
The Pan American Health Organization (PAHO), with support from the World Health Organization (WHO), approved the strategy and action plan for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of syphilis. The establishment of this strategy in 2010 aimed to reduce the incidence of CS to less than 0.5 cases per 1,000 live births by 2015.10,11
In Brazil, the CS incidence rate diverges from PAHO’s goals. This situation is observed with an increase of 3.8 times in CS incidence, jumping from 2.4 in 2010 to 9.0/1,000 live births in 2018. The increase in incidence is justified as a result of greater screening of syphilis.12 Despite this, the number of deaths from CS has increased in recent years, as observed in the present research.
In this study, despite fluctuations, all states in the Northeast region had high rates of CS, with a predominance of cases in Pernambuco, over the years. To control the mother-to-child transmission of syphilis, it is necessary to improve the access and quality of prenatal care, promote syphilis testing in the pregnant woman’s first appointment, ensure adequate and immediate treatment of the pregnant woman and partner1, training of health professionals health to carry out screening and early identification of cases13. Furthermore, the data suggest a variety of factors that may be related to vertical transmission, such as maternal, socioeconomic and prenatal care indicators.
Therefore, it is necessary to consider the particularities of each municipality in order to provide actions to cope with CS.14 Public policies in the Northeast region should be encouraged, with the intensification of geographic planning and the construction of maps that highlight the regions that need more effective control, including other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and prevalent pathologies based on improvements in public health.15
With regard to the diagnosis of CS, there was a predominance of neonates younger than seven days old, corresponding to 93.6% of cases. This finding is consistent with other studies that identified a predominance of the diagnosis in the first days of life.16,17
Syphilis infection prevailed in young, mixed-race pregnant women who had completed high school, results similar to previous studies.16,18Younger women are at the beginning of their sexual lives, which can lead to early, unprotected, multiple-partner sex and a high number of STIs.12 In this sense, it is important to implement actions that encourage safe sex practices to prevent unwanted pregnancies and prevent STI transmission.17 Furthermore, a study shows that the aforementioned sociodemographic characteristics are predominant in pregnant women with syphilis.16
Despite the pregnant women undergoing prenatal care, their and their partner’s treatment scheme was inadequate. Previous studies carried out in Maranhão16 and Minas Gerais18obtained similar results. Inadequate treatment and non-performance of the partner’s treatment, associated with infection in young pregnant women and with low education are determinants to prevent vertical transmission16. Until timely and solid actions are taken, syphilis will remain a health problem with adverse consequences to the maternal-fetal cycle,10 which denotes a deficiency in the public health system and the need to improve the quality of prenatal care1.
Appropriate treatment is possible with penicillin G benzathine, a safe and effective option during pregnancy provided by the Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde). Moreover, sexual partnerships of pregnant women with syphilis must be treated regardless of laboratory confirmation.19 The inadequate treatment of mothers and their partners reveals the fragility, while highlighting the importance of proper diagnosis and monitoring of pregnant women during prenatal care as well as greater attention in the child’s first year of life20.
By 2030, the elimination of CS as a public health problem will depend on the control of syphilis in the general population and on the treatment of partnerships of pregnant women with syphilis identified in the prenatal period.10 It is considered that the efforts of primary care can contribute to the decline in vertical transmission of syphilis, as it serves as a gateway, increasing proximity to patients.20Furthermore, the partner’s participation should be encouraged from the prenatal period, as it promotes the strengthening of the bond between the couple and with newborns. 21
The limitation of the study is related to the method used, since, due to the use of secondary data from official sources, there is the possibility of underreporting and incomplete information, given by failures in filling in the data.
There is an increase in CS every year in the Northeast region, accompanied by inadequate treatment of pregnant women and their partners in the prenatal period. This highlights the importance of new approaches, with the purpose of training health professionals, especially in primary care, for prevention, screening and effective treatment of syphilis in pregnant women in order to reduce CS cases. Studies that investigate the difficulties of pregnant women and partners with syphilis in adherence to prenatal care are recommended, as well as the weaknesses of health care for the screening and effective treatment of gestational syphilis.
REFERENCES
1. Wijesooriya NS, Rochat RW, Kamb ML, Turlapati P, Temmerman M, Broutet N, et al. Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis in 2008 and 2012: a health systems modelling study. Lancet Glob Health. 2016; 4(8):e525-e533. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(16)30135-8
2. Xue Z, Ying Y, Huijuan Y, Hongyan X, Sten HV, Kaibo L. Surveillance of Maternal Syphilis in China: Pregnancy Outcomes and Determinants of Congenital Syphilis. Med Sci Monit. 2018; 24: 7727-7735. https://www.medscimonit.com/download/index/idArt/910216
3. Cooper JM, Sánchez PJ. Congenital syphilis. Semin perinatol. 2018; 42(3): 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2018.02.005
4. Cooper JM, Michelow IC, Wozniak PS, Sánchez PJ. Em tempo: a persistência da sífilis congênita no Brasil – Mais avanços são necessários!. Rev Paul Pediatric. 2016; 34(3): 251-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rppede.2016.06.004
5. Bezerra MLMB, Fernandes FECV, Nunes JPO, Baltar SLSMA, Randau KP. Congenital Syphilis as a Measure of Maternal and Child Healthcare, Brazil. Emerg infect dis. 2019; 25(8): 1469-1476. https://dx.doi.org/10.3201/eid2508.180298
6. Motta IA, Delfino IRS, Santos LV, Morita MO, Gomes RGD, Martins TPS. Sífilis congênita: por que sua prevalência continua tão alta?. Rev med Minas Gerais. 2018; 28(Supl.6): e-S280610. https://dx.doi.org/10.5935/2238-3182.20180102
7. Feitosa JAS, Rocha CHR, Costa FS. Artigo de Revisão: Sífilis congênita. Rev Med Saude Brasilia. 2016; 5(2): 286-97. https://portalrevistas.ucb.br/index.php/rmsbr/article/download/6749/4573
8. Yajie W, Minzhi W, Xiangdong G, Liang Z, Jing Z, Chuanwu Z, et al. Risk Factors for Congenital Syphilis Transmitted from Mother to Infant — Suzhou, China, 2011–2014. MMWR morb mortal wkly rep. 2019; 68(10), 247-250. http://dx.doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6810a4
9. Instituto Brasileiro e Geografia e Estatística. Estimativa de população. https://sidra.ibge.gov.br/.
10. Korenromp EL, Rowley J, Alonso M, Mello MB, Wijesooriya NS, Mahiané SG, et al. Global burden of maternal and congenital syphilis and associated adverse birth outcomes – Estimates for 2016 and progress since 2012. PLos ONE. 2019; 14(2): e0219613. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211720
11. González MA. Regional initiative for the elimination of mother-to-child transmission of HIV and congenital syphilis in Latin America and the Caribbean: regional monitoring strategy. Washington (DC); 2010. https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/9992/9789275131114_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
12. Ministério de Saúde. (BR). Boletim epidemiológico Sífilis 2019. Brasília (DF); 2019. http://www.aids.gov.br/system/tdf/pub/2016/66888/boletim_sifilis_2019_internet_1.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=66888&force=1
13. Lago EG. Current Perspectives on Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of Syphilis. Cureus. 2016; 8(3): e525. https://www.cureus.com/articles/3310-current-perspectives-on-prevention-of-mother-to-child-transmission-of-syphilis
14. Soares KKS, Prado TN, Zandonade E, Moreira-Silva SF, Miranda AE. Análise espacial da sífilis em gestantes e sífilis congênita no estado do Espírito Santo, 2011-2018. 2020; 29(1): e2018193. https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1090252
15.Oliveira EH, Holanda EC, Silva LC, Brito MCS, Sousa PCM. Epidemiological evaluation of congenital syphilis in northeastern Brazil. Research, Society and Development. 2020; 10.33448/rsd-v10i3.11568.
16. Conceição HN, Câmara JT, Pereira BM. Análise epidemiológica e espacial dos casos de sífilis gestacional e congênita. Saúde debate. 2019; 43(123): 1145-1158. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104201912313
17. Signor M, Spagnolo LML, Tomberg JO, Gobatto M, Stofel NS. Spatial distribution and characterization of cases of congenital syphilis. Rev enferm UFPE on line. 2018; 12(2):398-406. https://doi.org/10.5205/1981-8963-v12i2a230522p398-406-2018
18. Lafetá KRG, Martelli Junior H, Silveira MF, Paranaiba LMR. Sífilis materna e congênita, subnotificação e difícil controle. Rev bras epidemiol. 2016; 19(1): 63-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1980-5497201600010006
19. Ministério da Saúde. (BR). Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas para Prevenção da Transmissão Vertical do HIV, Sífilis e Hepatites Virais. Brasília (DF); 2019. http://www.aids.gov.br/system/tdf/pub/2016/57801/miolo_pcdt_tv_08_2019.pdf?file=1&type=node&id=57801&force=1
20. Cavalcante PAM, Pereira RBL, Castro JGD. Sífilis gestacional e congênita em Palmas, Tocantins, 2007-2014. Epidemiol Serv Saúde (Online). 2017; 26(2): 255-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/s1679-49742017000200003
21. Holanda SM, Castro RCMB, Aquin OS, Pinheiro AKB, Lopes LG, Martins ES. Influência da Participação do Companheiro no Pré-Natal: Satisfação de Primíparas quanto ao Apoio no Parto. Texto contexto - enferm. 2020; 27 (2). https://doi.org/10.1590/0104-070720180003800016