1 INTRODUCTION

Introducing actions and practices of diversity and inclusion envolves a challenge faced by the administration, because their essence that is based on the defense and on the promotion of the rights between the subject and its organization (Conceição & Spink, 2013). The theme “diversity and inclusion” have been inserted in the Brazilian context. Conceição and Spink (2013) considers that the practice is not efective yet. The debate about the diversity in the organizational enviroment is relevant to manage heterogenic groups, seeking the efective comitment of the oganization to manage, that is not restrict to the hiring, because it needs to “include” the subject (Teixeira et al., 2021).

In that context, diversity and inclusion supplements each other. The inclusion is conceptualized by Freire (2008) as an educational, social and political movement, that aims to defend the right of the citizens to participate, in a conscious and responsable way, of the society, to be accepted and respected in their differences. Diversity is defined by Fleury (2000) as an interaction between people with a sort of carachteristics, in a same ensemble, that divides among the privileged people and those who are in a situation of social disadvantage, that is, minorized. Thus, in the current conjecture, the topic of diversity has been debated even more in Brazil, due to its known history of cultural richness, leading diversity management, through people management, to a constant search for social integration and inclusion. (Queiroz et al., 2018, p. 17).

Saraiva and Irigaray (2009), and Alves and Galeão-Silva (2004) confirms that the recognizement and the value of individual characteristics in their teams, when enfatized by organizations, tend to present better results. Furthermore, Hayes (2002) highlights that the feeling of being welcomed as a member within institutions, being recognized and valued for their skills and unique contributions to its success, contributes favorably to the individual giving their best in this environment. In this way, managing diversity, a concept still under construction (Fleury, 2000), becomes a matter of survival for organizations, given the increase in the increasingly heterogeneous workforce (Thomas, 1990).

Hunt et al. (2018) says, in a research paper from McKinsey, that the organizations with ethinical-racial diversity in high level of leadership presents 33% more of the capacity of obtaining profits. Likewise, those who has a gender diversity shows high potential of been profitables, about 22 and 23%, among the more than a thousand companies from 15 countries that were interviewed.

Notwithstanding, the plurality of identities is not characterized by those two categories, because Maccali et al. (2015) understands that the diversity is multidimensional and, consequently, envolves a sort of characteristics, like: etnical-racial factor, gender, sexual orientation, generation, social class, fisical and mental capacities, family, religion, demography, profession, politics and, alson, another personal affiliation (Carneiro, 1995). Notwithstanding, companies superficially adopt inclusive practices to legitimize themselves with the market (Lounsbury & Crumley, 2007), or with customers (Wailes & Michelson, 2008). In this sense, Campos (2019) says that:

[…] the way in which companies currently seek to demonstrate engagement with diversity causes, especially with a focus on the inclusion of black people in the corporate environment of companies/brands, can give them a qualitative result regarding their image, from the moment the authentic It's what you show and not what you actually are (p. 32).

Therefore, there is an absence of implementation of diversity and inclusion practices in the accounting market, which can be seen in the study by Santiago et al. (2019), which was carried out in different areas of Accounting, with individuals working in the most varied positions, in which there were certain discomforts, essentially in relation to gender diversity, since they did not consider themselves to belong to the organization to the point of assuming their identities.

Another question concerning organizations concerns the fact that they present discourses of “embracing the cause”, although Desai (2020) emphasizes the urgency of encouraging diversity and inclusion. In this sense, Fleury (2000) says that, in a country like Brazil, where society was built and remains heterogeneous, with many social inequalities, the theme “cultural diversity” assumes relevance, and must be highlighted in debates. Marques et al. (2020) analyzed research on this topic. They concluded that there is no consistency in publications on this topic. This variability of articles in the period analyzed made it impossible to identify a trend or projection regarding future research on the subject in question, especially in the context of Accounting, a fact that motivated the research that gave rise to this article. Therefore, the following research question was formulated: What has been published in Brazil about diversity and inclusion in the Accounting Science environment in organizations?

Thus, the objective of this research is to analyze, based on scientific articles already published, the context in which the theme “diversity and social inclusion” permeates the accounting environment. The results obtained through this study contribute to deepening internal and external discussions on the topic, involving an organizational context and the dissemination of diversity and inclusion, contributing to the stimulation or even impulse of the adoption of inclusion practices, improving the image of companies, the search for talent recognition and development, as well as attracting clients who perceive diversity and inclusion as a social responsibility. The research also provides the awakening of social awareness, as factors such as social responsibility and the re-education of prejudices and discrimination are points discussed when talking about inclusion and diversity. Furthermore, from a theoretical perspective, the research elucidates the state of the art, providing a broader view of the debate on diversity and inclusion in the field of accounting science; highlighting gaps to be explored in future research.

2 THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK

2.1 Diversity

Brazil can be seen as one of the countries with the greatest cultural diversity, perhaps because it is considered, worldwide, as the fifth largest country in terms of size and population. Added to this is its entire history, which has been characterized since its discovery by the relationship between different peoples, such as natives, immigrants from the European, African and Asian continents (Teixeira et al., 2021). However, even presenting a scenario of all this cultural diversity, discrimination against some groups can be seen, which triggers social inequality, which can be explained by the refusal to admit the existence of discrimination, justified by miscegenation (Alves & Galeão-Silva, 2004). Regarding the concept of diversity, Lapolli et al. (2022) argue that diversity is associated with the historical, social, political and cultural context, which means a representation of a society; however, its understanding can permeate the expansion of individuality, which has its representation in a social model, presenting a complex conception as the basic format of society (Lapolli et al., 2022).

Alves and Galeão-Silva (2004) mention that, in Brazil, discussions on the subject have taken longer compared to other countries, emerging since 1990, although public affirmative action policies have emerged since 1960. This, possibly, It originates from the contradiction conveyed by the ideology of the myth of racial democracy, which insists on not admitting the existence of discrimination regarding diversity. That said, it is considered that, in a society made up of individuals with different characteristics, different organizations are also formed (Carneiro & Santos, 1985). In this way, Fleury (2000) defines diversity as an interaction of people with their different characteristics in the same group, which is divided between those who find themselves, in some way, in a situation of social disadvantage, in a relationship between minority and the majority, which is the ensemble.

Fleury (2000) also proposes that diversity management is related to increasing the diversification of the workforce and the search for competitive advantage within organizations. Therefore, it is considered that managers rely on the diversity of the available workforce to seek a competitive advantage, seeking to implement practices that contribute to improving results. With this, it is expected that these organizations value the potential workforce that society offers, without there being any distinction, because, according to the Federal Constitution of 1988, in its article 5, everyone is equal before the Law, as well as they have the right to life, liberty, equality, security and property (Brasil, 1988).

Based on the assumption that organizations operate in a dynamic market, to obtain better results, they must seek to accompany the various changes within this context, to perceive diversity as an opportunity to become more competitive, recognizing and valuing its professionals. In other words, being able to understand that all human capital individually has values that contribute to the better development of a team, and, therefore, of the organization itself.

Given the above, it is possible to state that diversity and inclusion can be understood as interdependent, since, in addition to having distinct individuals on the team, there is also the need to create a feeling of belonging in them, which occurs through of inclusion practices, as discussed in the following topic.

2.2 Inclusion

The word inclusion, according to Aurélio (2021, para. 1), “is the action or effect of”; the prefix “in” means “in/within”, and “claudere” expresses “to close”. Camargo (2017) asserts that inclusion is a social practice based on attitude and perception of things, of oneself and of others, applied in all environments, such as work, education, culture, among others. In this way, inclusion practices aim to promote the effective participation of all human beings, especially those who are particularly excluded from the most diverse social environments.

One of the reasons why inclusion is difficult to implement is the lack of a clearer definition (Freire, 2008). In this context, what does inclusion mean? The authors Almeida and Gatti (2020) sought this definition and found that the answer depends on the social and ideological place that the respondent occupies. Consequently, it can be said that there are several meanings assumed in this word. Inclusion is an antithesis of exclusion; it is a universal and endless movement, since, for there to be an inclusive movement, there must be “excluded” (Mitller, 2003). This movement, according to the author, is based on a system of values, which makes individuals feel welcome, thus celebrating diversity, regardless of scope.

In this research, the inclusion approach is aimed at organizations. For Ferdman et al. (2009), inclusion is a way of making members of various groups feel included, so that they have equal opportunities and are treated fairly. Zanelli et al. (2014) clarify that there is no possibility of dissociating inclusion from exclusion, since, in the organizational field, working conditions can be interpreted as inclusive or exclusionary. Despite company's efforts to retain diverse talent in their workforce, the authors found that minority groups (Souza, 2021) still face discrimination. This suggests that diversity is not a guarantee that there will be inclusion, which reinforces the need to deepen into its indicators, differentiating them from those used for diversity (Roberson, 2006).

Theorists Nguyen et al. (2023) and Mor Barak and Cherin (1998) sought to understand this process of inclusion and exclusion in companies. To this end, the authors captured three forms of conceptualizations of inclusion, providing a comprehensive perception of the clusters of topics focused on inclusion and measurement instruments. The authors also recommended a form of inclusion focused on empirical evidence related to inclusion in the workplace.

Ferdman (2020), on the other hand, addressed inclusive leadership as an attempt to understand, through differences, value the identities involved in work processes, as “Inclusive leaders facilitate participation, voice and belonging – without demanding assimilation and, at the same time, promoting equity and justice across identities” (p. 1). As such, the topic gains academic relevance, given the importance of adopting diversity and inclusion as a strategy to enhance business, and stimulate creativity and innovation.

3 METHODOLOGY

Bibliometric research is widely used as a form of quantitative and qualitative analysis of data obtained from bibliographic sources. According to Moed (2005), this research methodology is particularly useful in areas with many publications, such as science, technology and social sciences. Cronin (1984) highlights that the analysis of citations in scientific works is one of the main aspects of bibliometric research, allowing the identification of trends, themes and patterns in each area of study. Glänzel and Moed (2017) emphasize that the use of publication and patent statistics is one of the main approaches to bibliometric research for the analysis of science and technology systems. Furthermore, Egghe (2006) recalls the importance of the “G” index as an indicator of scientific productivity, while Bornmann (2014) approaches the advantages and disadvantages of using altmetrics as a way of evaluating the impact of scientific research.

To produce this article, bibliometric analysis was used as the main method. The approach adopted is quantitative-quali: quantitative in terms of surveying scientific articles published on diversity and inclusion; and qualitative regarding the Content Analysis of these articles, which sought to understand how the topic has been approached by scientific research within Applied Social Sciences, in particular, Accounting Science. The scope of this article is limited to published studies, covering only works that present the terms “diversity” and/or “inclusion”, either in their title or in their group of keywords.

3.1 Data selection

The database for this work were collected in the following: a search was carried out using the terms “diversity” and “inclusion” as selection criteria in the Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library (Spell) database. Considered as an initiative of the National Association of Postgraduate Studies and Research in Administration (Anpad), Spell consists of a repository of scientific works in the area of Applied Social Sciences, particularly in the areas of Public and Business Administration, Accounting and Tourism, arranged in a system of indexing, research and free availability of scientific production (Spell, 2012), which meets the purpose of this work, which is to carry out a bibliometric analysis based on scientific articles already published in the mentioned area.

Thus, the database was chosen as a survey source for research. As the database is relatively recent, the entire period available until June 2021 was considered, where articles published on the subject since 1991 were found. To identify these works, the following descriptors were used: “diversity” and “inclusion”, in the Spell database, as shown in Table 1:

In Spell, the “keyword” field was selected, and the term “diversity” was inserted. The search had a total of 65 results. After that, filters were applied: 1) Type of document: paper; 2) Area of knowledge: Accounting, reaching a total of 25 papers. Next, the “title” field was selected and the same descriptor was searched for: “diversity”. As a result, the search returned a total of 110 results. Then, the same filters were applied again, reaching a total of 39 articles. Next, the same criteria were applied to the term “inclusion”. When using it as a keyword, we obtained a result of 42 works. With the application of the filters, the number of works was reduced to 12. When the term was defined for the title, the search presented 137 papers as a result, a quantity that was reduced to 34, when the filters already described above were applied.

Given the searches, a result of 110 papers was found, among which we analyzed through the title and reading the summary of those mentioned, excluding those that were repeated, since they presented the term “diversity” or “inclusion”, both in the keyword and in the title, reaching a sample of 78. Furthermore, another 30 were excluded from the sample, as they did not cover the accounting area, and were therefore not in line with the objective of the work, which is related to accounting topics. Thus, a final sample of 48 papers was obtained to support the research analysis, as shown in Table 1.

3.2 Data analysis technique

Initially, using the bibliometric study, which according to Lopes, Antunes and Rodrigues (2018) consists of a quantitative technique that allows measuring numerical and statistical data and can build indices on a given scientific production, it was possible to analyze bibliometric indicators regarding to aspects between publications and researchers; periodicals and citations; and content reported in the articles. Considering that the research attempts to describe the characteristics of the papers collected for analysis, the research has a descriptive character.

Subsequently, to understand and interpret, through scientific publications, how Accounting Science has treated the theme “diversity and inclusion”, Content Analysis, of a qualitative nature, was adopted as a data analysis technique, which, as stated Chizzotti (2006), aims to understand the meaning of what is being communicated, manifestly or not, and with explicit meanings or not. In a complementary way, Bardin (1977) presents different phases for carrying out a study through Content Analysis, which are prepared sequentially, ranging from pre-analysis, through exploration of the material to be analyzed, to treatment of results, inference and interpretation.

The pre-analysis consisted of choosing the materials for the study. This happened through an initial reading of the abstract of each paper. In the material exploration phase, some elements of the selected scientific papers were investigated, separating them by title of the work; key words; goal; problem; methodology, research method and data analysis technique; contributions; and suggestions for future research. Regarding the characteristics of the publication, the following were observed: magazine/periodical; Qualis concept Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Capes); and year of publication. Finally, the main data of the authors were highlighted, such as: name, title and link/affiliation of the researcher with the Educational Institution and the Federation Unit. To record the collected data, a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet was used.

Finally, the analysis of the sample of scientific production on the theme “diversity and inclusion” sought to achieve the objective of the work, presenting an overview of publications, according to the following topic.

4 ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSION OF RESULTS

In this section of the paper, the results obtained from the analysis of the 48 papers used as the final sample of this research, deposited in the Spell database, considering their entire available period of publication, until June 2021, are presented.

4.1 Aspects regarding publications and researchers

In this topic, the following were analyzed: the production of research published by State; the number of publications, subdivided by theme; the researchers who published the most in the period; and the number of publications per Higher Education Institution (HEI). First, according to the bibliometric analysis, it is worth presenting some general information about the 48 papers.

Thus, to demonstrate the first aspect, which is how scientific production is distributed in Brazil, from 1991 to 2021, authors and co-authors of the papers and their link/affiliation with the HEI were considerated, as well as the Federation Unit which the institution belongs, according to consolidated data in Figure 1, on the map of Brazil.

Observing Figure 1, a certain regionalization can be seen, mainly in the Southeast, South and Northeast Regions, as, of the 122 authors identified, it was found that almost 60%, from a number of 69 authors, are distributed among the states of São Paulo, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro and Espírito Santo. In the Southeast Region, therefore, the number of researchers was divided into 30, 18, 15 and 6, respectively. Next, we have the South Region, represented by 26 authors, 11 from Santa Catarina, 10 from Rio Grande do Sul and 5 from Paraná. Next, the Northeast Region was observed, with 12 researchers from Ceará, 7 from Rio Grande do Norte and 1 from Paraíba. Finally, 6 researchers from the Federal District (DF) and 1 from the state of Pará were identified. So, when the 27 Federation Units were considered, it was observed that there were no publications on the topic “diversity and inclusion” by linked researchers to HEIs belonging to the other 16 states. Analyzing the second aspect, the year of publication was considered, and which topic was discussed in the paper, as shown in Figure 2.

It was noticed that most publications discuss the topic with a focus on “diversity”, with the paper published in 1991; while the first publication found on “inclusion” only appears in 2006. However, it is noteworthy that there have been no publications in some years

An oscillation was observed in research, a fact that does not allow us to infer linear growth, despite showing that, since 2006, with the exception of 2009, 2011 and 2013, research appears on both themes, even if “inclusion” on a smaller quantity, accordingly with existing literature (Werneck, 2000, 2003; Pinsk & Eluf, 2000; Sassaki, 2005; Coutinho, 2006, among others), which states that the two themes are complementary. The following analysis deals with the number of researchers who published the most in the period, in Table 3:

It was noted that of the 122 researchers who contributed to the work, only four published more than one paper on the topic during the period. Researcher Maria Nivalda de Carvalho-Freitas published four, one from the Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), and the other three from the Federal University of São João Del-Rei (UFSJ). Next, Darcy Mitiko Mori Hanashiro and Janette Brunstein appear, with three publications each, and, finally, Josiane Silva de Oliveira, with two publications, all with a doctorate degree. It was also noticed that the HEIs which the researchers have an affiliation are in the states of Minas Gerais, Rio Grande do Sul, São Paulo and Paraná, which indicated a greater number of authors who research on the theme, according to what was presented in Figure 1. It is noteworthy that Professor Josiane has an affiliation with the Federal University of Goiás (UFG), in addition to the State University of Maringá (UEM).

One of the categories listed was the authors' titles, which was verified through the resume available on the Lattes Platform. One finding, when analyzing the content of the resumes of the notable researchers highlighted in Table 1, was that, although they have different areas of training, they work in lines of research that seek to provide equity to social actors within organizations and society as a whole.

Analyzing Table 4, it is clear that all researchers are involved with activist spaces engaged in promoting actions that aim to bring about transformations in society, such as the Center for Afro-Brazilian Interdisciplinary Studies (NEIAB), which is a group of teachers and students, which aims to expand the debate on racial issues (Núcleo de Estudos Interdisciplinares Afro-Brasileiros da Universidade Estadual de Maringá [NEIAB-UEM], 2020). It should be noted that none of the researchers highlighted in this work have training in Accounting. To analyze the HEIs with the greatest scientific production on the topic, Table 5 was created, with the frequency of publications per institution.

According to Table 5, 42 HEIs were identified, in which researchers have an affiliation, considering, for this aspect, the data found in each paper. It should be noted that frequency was computed by the statement presented in the paper, where the researcher's name appears as the author of it, but also as a professor with an affiliation from the same institution or another. For example, the name of the researcher Josiane Silva de Oliveira, who in one of her publications, she is declared as an author in a paper and, at the same time, as a professor at the Federal University of Goiás, a fact that highlighted the UFG in Table 6. As a result, the IES that hosts the highest frequency of researchers who have published works on the topic is Mackenzie, which is at the top of the table, with 29 points, representing 20% ​​of the total, followed by UFMG and the Federal University from Ceará (UFC), which reached 10 points, representing 7% each. Mackenzie and UFMG are institutions located in the Southeast Region, reinforcing the results in Figure 1. Continuing, we observed that UFSJ and the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN), with 9 and 7 points, respectively, representing 6 and 5%. The others had a representation of 3 and 2%, except for those institutions with only one researcher, as already observed in Table 5.

4.2 Aspects regarding periodicals and citations

In this section, we seek to deal with the periodicals in which the papers were published, analyzing some related aspects, such as the number of publications per Qualis Capes concept, periodicals in which they published and the number of quotes in these periodicals. Below, Table 6 presents the list of journals and their respective Qualis Capes concepts and number of publications.

When considering the Qualis Capes of the 2017-2020 quadrennium periodical classification events, it was noted that the publications were published by periodicals classified in strata A2, A3, B1 and B2. According to Barata (2017), whatever the area of knowledge, only half of the periodicals used by teachers and students to publish their publications can be classified among those of excellence (strata A) or of higher quality (B1) (Barata, 2017). Therefore, considering the Qualis classification of the journals that published the analyzed publications, it is believed that the topic, when researched and published, has a relevant impact on scientific production.

Furthermore, it should be noted that no publication was identified in the Spell database in an A1 stratum periodical, but on the other hand, of the 48 publications analyzed, 17 were in A2 concept periodicals and 9 in A3, representing more than 50% were published in excellent journals. It should be highlighted that the non-use of different databases prevented other journals that qualify with an excellent Qualis Capes concept from being reached as well.

Still on Table 6, it is observed that of the 21 journals that published scientific works on “diversity and inclusion”, it was found that RAE was one of those that published the most, with seven papers, followed by RAC, REAd and Interface, with 4 publications each. Soon after, RAE electrónica, Revista Alcance and Revista Gestão Organizacional (RGO) appear, which published three papers each. The other magazines appear with one or two publications.

In addition, it was noted that the articles analyzed were cited 343 times, highlighting that the Revista de Administração de Empresas was the most cited periodical, with 164 quotes. It is understood that the number of quotes is associated with the recognition of the value of published research and its results; given that the relationship given by the number of times that papers in a journal are quoted and the total number of papers published each year results in the journal's “Impact Factor”. Therefore, it is believed that the more the periodical is mentioned, the greater the degree of recognition of its value, therefore, of the articles published by it.

The next aspect to be analyzed is the content reported in the papers.

4.3 Content related in the papers

As already mentioned, according to Maccali et al. (2015), diversity involves several dimensions, which consequently covers several characteristics such as ethnic-racial factor, gender, sexual orientation, generation, social class, physical and mental capabilities, family, religion, demography, profession, politics and, even, other personal affiliations (Carneiro, 1995). Thus, to expose the main points found in the articles, the dimensions of diversity and research gaps are presented.

To verify how all this scientific production is distributed, regarding to the various dimensions of diversity, the subjects covered in each article were listed, and shown in Table 7.

Analyzing Table 7, we noticed a lack of research in some dimensions, among the articles analyzed, in which we did not find those that specifically deal with sexual orientation, religion, professionalism, politics, culture and other personal affiliations. Furthermore, when it comes to “diversity”, there was a greater number of research on gender and People with Disabilities. On the topic of “inclusion”, research focuses more on ableism. It can be highlighted that many of the papers analyzed discuss diversity and inclusion in a generic way, presenting proposals on diversity management, and not specifically looking at one of the different dimensions. For example, one of the works that presented as its objective the investigation of the adoption of public policies aimed at developing, in the population, the skills necessary for their inclusion in the market, then, it was understood as a more general proposal, with these works, brought together in the dimension here called general. To show the research gaps in the existing literature, Table 8 was prepared, which presents the titles of the works and suggestions for future research.

Regarding suggestions for future research, it was observed that in 22 papers, out of a universe of 48 analyzed, representing 46%, no possible suggestions for future research or research limitations were identified. This fact may be related to the methodology used by the studies, given that the majority refers to bibliographic research. However, among the studies that made suggestions, it was observed that six suggested a larger sample, to support a study with greater assertiveness, or even prove the assumptions.

The research, whose titles are “Proposition of a Theoretical Model of Social Innovation for the Inclusion of Senegalese Immigrants in the Labor Market”, “To be or not to be in favor of diversity practices” and “That is the question and Similarity and dissimilarity between superiors and subordinates and its implications for the quality of the dyadic relationship”, recommend testing, through statistics and a new sample, the methodological model used. However, upon analysis, it was realized that there is still a lot to explore regarding the topic, especially when it comes to making diversity and inclusion practices more effective.

The research mentioned makes an important contribution to studies on diversity, inclusion and social innovation in the workplace. However, there is much to be explored in these topics, especially about the effectiveness of diversity and inclusion practices. Therefore, a suggested sequence of research could be the empirical investigation of diversity and inclusion practices in different organizational contexts, with the aim of evaluating their effects on promoting a more inclusive work environment and improving organizational performance. Furthermore, it would be interesting to analyze the role of leadership in promoting diversity and inclusion, as well as the impact of training and development programs on the formation of more inclusive and collaborative teams. It needs to be emphasised the reflection on carrying out research from the employer's point of view towards the employee, to investigate whether the company is aware of the aspects that can include or exclude an employee, what are the actions that the company takes to recruit and maintain a diverse team, where prejudice is minimized. Although filters were used for articles in accounting area, some articles provide a more general overview of the discussion on the topic, including the article entitled “A model of public policies that generates income: an experience promoted by the Municipality of São Paulo”, whose objective was to investigate the adoption of public policies aimed at developing, in the population, the skills necessary for their inclusion in the market, which did not only cover the area of ​​accounting, but also the market. In this sense, papers were selected that had a direct relationship with the accounting area, involving professionals in the area, more specific accounting subjects, highlighting the results and contributions of these research, as shown in Table 9.

Based on the results and contributions of some papers, it is inferred that Accounting Science has realized the benefits of diversity and inclusion in its field. However, although there is research that points to positive effects on diversity and inclusion practices in organizations, it was noticed that there are gaps, as it was noted, in the materials analyzed, that a large part of the Boards of Directors are still mostly made up of men, as well as when articles point out that senior management positions are still more occupied by white men. There was also a need for research that revolves around advancing the deconstruction of prejudice regarding various aspects, considering both the positive relationship between diversity and performance, and, mainly, the appreciation of the individual in the organization and in society. With the purpose of illustrating the topics most covered in the scientific works analyzed in this research, a word cloud was created using the Nvivo software, considering the full text of the papers, as shown in Figure 3.

The most prominent terms are those that occur most in the text. Thus, it was noticed that the terms most linked to diversity appear more frequently, perhaps because more than 60% of the works are dealing with the topic. Finally, it is worth highlighting that diversity is a crucial element in building a fairer and more inclusive society. When diversity is embraced, differences between people are recognized and valued, like gender, race, ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, among other characteristics. This allows us to celebrate the variety of perspectives, skills and experiences that each individual can bring to the world. Furthermore, by promoting diversity, a more welcoming and respectful environment is created for all members of society, regardless of their differences. It is important to remember that diversity is not just an issue of social justice, but can also bring many practical benefits to companies, organizations and communities in general. By leveraging a variety of talents and skills, you can create more creative and effective solutions to challenges. Therefore, it is crucial to value and promote diversity in all areas of life, so that we can build a fairer and more inclusive future for everyone.

5 CONCLUSIONS

The objective of this research was to analyze, based on scientific papers already published, the context in which the theme “diversity and inclusion” permeates the accounting environment. To achieve this objective, a descriptive analysis was carried out of the elements considered most relevant in them. In this way, using bibliometric study as the main method, it was possible to present an overview of scientific production in Brazil, available in the Spell database, considering the entire available period, until June 2021, of papers published in national journals. The analyses, with a quantitative and qualitative approach, included the number of published papers, researchers who publish on the topic, journals and their respective concepts, quotes and content reported in them. For that matter, 48 papers published in national journals between 1991 and June 2021 were analyzed, revealing that there is a theoretical-scientific discussion on the topic, but the practice still presents a low level of diversity in some organizations. Furthermore, inclusion still requires more efforts on the part of researchers.

Through this research, it was possible to analyze that published studies show that, despite there being theoretical-scientific discussion on the topic, some point out that, in practice, some organizations are characterized by a low level of diversity, which involves salaries not egalitarian, low presence of women on boards or senior management positions, black people and others. Furthermore, the research showed that inclusion requires more efforts on the part of researchers, to verify whether organizations use inclusion practices that provide, especially People with Disabilities, acceptance, interaction and integration within their teams.

It needed to be highlighted some limitations found in carrying out the research, such as: using only the Spell database to collect data, making it impossible to present analyzes of co-authorship, co-occurrences and co-citations, as the chosen software was not interconnected with Spell. Another limitation, considering only papers from the Spell database, was that works published in the annals of scientific events may have been left out of the analysis.

Therefore, the following are suggestions for future research: 1) carry out a new bibliometric study, using another databases, expanding the field of research, to verify the scenario outside Brazil; 2) when considering the lack of research on some dimensions of diversity, it is suggested to carry out research that seeks to contemplate other dimensions, and, mainly, that are carried out with the aim of listening mainly to the different individuals who make up the teams , and not just organizations; 3) also consult publications from conferences, such as the Association of Postgraduate Programs in Accounting Sciences (ANPCONT), aiming at the scenario on diversity and inclusion in the area of Accounting Science.

Based on the analysis of published studies, the issue of diversity in organizations is still an open topic, with some research pointing to the existence of a low level of diversity in practice. In this sense, inclusion requires more efforts on the part of researchers and organizations, to guarantee the acceptance, interaction and integration of different individuals in work teams.

REFERENCES

Almeida, M. H., & Gatti, M. A. (2020). Inclusão à moda brasileira: considerações sobre o termo ‘inclusão’ e suas variantes no discurso da Revista Nova Escola. Revista HISTEDBR On-line, (20) e020034. https://doi.org/10.20396/rho.v20i0.8657628

Alves, M. A., & Galeão-Silva, L. G. (2004). A crítica da gestão da diversidade nas organizações. RAE Revista de Administração de Empresas, 44(3), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902004000300003

Amaral, D. J., Godoy, A. S., César, A. M. R. V. C., & da Silva, A. A. (2007). Diversidade de Gênero e Formação do Endogrupo: Uma contribuição da teoria da troca entre líder e membro (LMX). Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios-RBGN, 9(24), 41-59.

Aurélio. (2021). Conceito de inclusão. https://www.dicio.com.br/aurelio-2/

Barata, R. D. C. B. (2017). Dez coisas que você deveria saber sobre o Qualis. Boletim Técnico do PPEC, 2(1), 17p-17p. https://doi.org/10.21713/2358-2332.2016.v13.947

Bardin, L. (1977). Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa edições, 70, 225.

Bornmann, L. (2014). Do Altmetrics Point to the Broader Impact of Research? An Overview of Benefits and Disadvantages of Altmetrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(4), 895-903.

Brasil. (1988). Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil de 1988. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/Constituicao/Constituicao.htm

Brunstein, J., & Jaime, P. (2009). Da estratégia individual à ação coletiva: grupos de suporte e gênero no contexto da gestão da diversidade. RAE eletrônica, 8. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-56482009000200004

Camargo, E. P. (2017). Inclusão social, educação inclusiva e educação especial: enlaces e desenlaces. Ciência & Educação, 23(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320170010001

Campos, M. P. (2019) A inclusão de negros nas empresas: uma perspectiva negra da estratégia corporativa. Monografia (Bacharelado em Comunicação Social) – Escola de Comunicação da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro.

Carneiro, S. (1995). A mulher negra na década – a busca da autonomia. Cadernos Geledés, 5.

Carneiro, S., & Santos, T. (1985). Mulher negra. Conselho Estadual da Condição Feminina/Nobel.

Carvalho-Freitas, M. N. D., Toledo, I. D. Á., Nepomuceno, M. F., Suzano, J. D. C. C., & Almeida, L. A. D. (2010). Socialização organizacional de pessoas com deficiência. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 50, 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902010000300003

Chizzotti, A. (2006). Pesquisa em ciências humanas e sociais (8th. ed.). Cortez.

Conceição, E. B., & Spink, P. K. (2013). Which foot first: diversity management and affirmative action in Brazilian business. Management International, 17, 25-36. https://doi.org/10.7202/1015809ar

Costa, L., Sampaio, J. D. O., & Flores, E. S. (2019). Diversidade de gênero nos conselhos administrativos e sua relação com desempenho e risco financeiro nas empresas familiares. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 23, 721-738. https://doi.org/10.1590/1982-7849rac2019180327

Coutinho, M. C. (2006). Dialética da exclusão / inclusão em uma organização industrial. RAE-eletrônica, 5(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-56482006000100008

Cronin, B. (1984). The Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication. Taylor & Francis.

Desai, A. M. (2020). Diversity in accounting. An ethical, social and practical imperative.https://www.accountingtoday.com/opinion/diversity-in-accounting-an-ethical-social-and-practical-imperative

Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and Practice of the G-Index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0144-7

Ferdman, B. M., Barrera, V., Allen, A. A., & Vuong, V. (2009). Inclusive behavior and the experience of inclusion. Gender and diversity in organizations division. Academy of Management.

Ferdman, B. M. (2020). Liderança inclusiva: O fulcro da inclusão. Liderança Inclusiva, 3-24. Routledge.

Fernandes, F. R., Lopes, F. M., Oliveira, G. A., Ferreira, T. S., Welzel, E., & Pereira, J. B. C. (2014). Atitudes de aceitação e rejeição de indivíduos às ações organizacionais em prol da diversidade da força de trabalho. Revista Gestão Organizacional, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22277/rgo.v7i1.1209

Ferreira, L. C. D. M., & Rais, L. A. (2016). Qual a relação entre diversidade e desempenho? Um estudo sobre a relação entre a proporção de pessoas com deficiência na produtividade das empresas brasileiras. Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 18, 108-124. https://doi.org/10.7819/rbgn.v18i59.2769

Filippim, E. S., Schumarcher, M., & Alperstedt, G. D. (2018). A inserção de imigrantes haitianos em uma organização no Sul do Brasil: dificuldades e desafios. Gestão e sociedade, 12(31), 2067-2095.

Fleury, M. T. L. (2000). Gerenciando a diversidade cultural: experiências de empresas brasileiras. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 40(3), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902000000300003

Fraga, J. B., & Silva, V. A. B. (2012). Board diversity and firm performance: an empirical investigation in the Brazilian market. Brazilian Business Review, 9(Special Ed), 55-77. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbrconf.2012.3

Freire, S. (2008). Um olhar sobre a inclusão. Revista da Educação, 15(1), 5-20.

Glänzel, W., & Moed, H. F. (2017). Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-2755-9

Gomes, R. R., & Costa, M. T. P. (2017). Análise e Perspectivas do Laboratório de Acessibilidade da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte: um estudo de caso na Biblioteca Central Zila Mamede. Revista Interface, 14(2), 20-37.

Hayes, B. C. (2002). Creating inclusive organizations: its meaning and measurement. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of doctor of philosophy.

Hunt, V., Yee, L., Prince, S., & Sundiatu Dixon-Fyle. (2018). A diversidade como alavanca de performance. McKinsey & Company.

Lapolli, E. M., Paranhos, W. R., & Willerding, I. A. V. (2022) Diversidades: o bê-á-bá para a compreensão das diferenças. (1st. ed.) Pandrion. https://doi.org/10.29327/558185

Lara, L. F. (2013). A Gestão de Pessoas e o Desafio da Inclusão das Pessoas com Deficiência: Uma Visão Antropológica da Deficiência. Capital Científico, 11(3).

Lazzaretti, K., Piekas, A. A. S., & Julkovski, D. J. (2019). Características dos Conselhos de Administração e desempenho das firmas brasileiras de capital aberto. Revista Gestão Organizacional, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.22277/rgo.v12i3.5197

Leopoldino, C. B. (2015). Inclusão de autistas no mercado de trabalho: uma nova questão de pesquisa. Revista Eletrônica Gestão & Sociedade, 9(22), 853-868. https://doi.org/10.21171/ges.v9i22.2033

Lopes, J., Antunes, H. & Rodrigues, R. (2018). Comparative Entrepreneurship between Western Europe and Latin America. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 8(4), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1515/erj-2017-0058

Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. T. (2007). New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993-1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078111

Maccali, N., Kuabara, P. S. S., Takahashi, A. R. W., Roglio, K. D. D., & Boehs, S. D. T. (2015). As práticas de recursos humanos para a gestão da diversidade: a inclusão de deficientes intelectuais em uma federação pública do Brasil. RAM. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 16, 157-187. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-69712015/administracao.v16n2p157-187

Marques, E. C., Júnior, Marques, A. L. B. A., & Dantas, A. B. (2020). Gestão da Diversidade no Brasil: Artigos Publicados na Base Spell no Período 2006 – 2016. Amazônia, Organizações e Sustentabilidade, 9(1), 27-49.

Mittler, P. (2003). Educação Inclusiva: contexto sociais. Artmed.

Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3714-7

Mor Barak, M. E., & Cherin, D. A. (1998). A Tool Expand Organizational Understanding of Workforce Diversity: developing a measure of inclusion-exclusion. Administration in Social Work, 22(1), 47-74. https://doi.org/10.1300/J147V22N01_04

Nguyen, L. A., Evan, R., Chaudhuri, S., Hagen, M., & Williams, D. (2023). Inclusão no local de trabalho: uma revisão integrativa da literatura. Revista Europeia de Formação e Desenvolvimento. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-10-2022-0104

Nisiyama, E. K., & Nakamura, W. T. (2018). Diversidade do conselho de administração e a estrutura de capital. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 58, 551-563. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020180604

Núcleo de Estudos Interdisciplinares Afro-brasileiros da Universidade Estadual de Maringá (2020). NEIAB-UEM: Núcleo de Estudos Interdisciplinares Afro-brasileiros. NEIAB (UEM) website. http://sites.uem.br/neiab/

Oliveira, I. G. S., Cardoso, S. P., Dias, R. S., & Borges, P., Júnior. (2019). Influence of Female boardroom presence on firm value: An analysis on companies listed on B3. Revista de Negócios, 23(3), 49-58.

Pereira, J. B. C., & Hanashiro, D. M. M. (2010). Ser ou não ser favorável às práticas de diversidade? Eis a questão. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 14, 670-683. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552010000400007

Pessoa, F. E. N., Maia, A. J. R., Façanha, M. C., Guimarães, D. B., & Rebouças, S. M. D. P. (2020). Determinantes da diversidade de gênero das empresas do BRICS. Revista Gestão Organizacional, 13(3), 162-183. https://doi.org/10.22277/rgo.v13i3.4961

Prado Gonçalves, E. B., Espejo, M. M. S. B., Altoé, S. M. L., & Voese, S. B. (2016). Gestão da diversidade: um estudo de gênero e raça em grandes empresas brasileiras. Enfoque: Reflexão Contábil, 35(1), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.4025/enfoque.v35i1.30050

Prudêncio, P., Forte, H., Crisóstomo, V., & Vasconcelos, A. (2021). Efeito da Diversidade do Conselho de Administração e da Diretoria Executiva na Responsabilidade Social Corporativa. BBR. Brazilian Business Review, 18, 118-139. https://doi.org/10.15728/bbr.2021.18.2.1

Queiroz, C. S. R., Santos, G. S., Soares, L. J. S., Ossuna, V. S., & Pereira, M. S. (2018). Análise da literatura da base de periódicos spell sobre a temática gestão da diversidade. Revista Estudos e Pesquisas em Administração, 2(2), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.30781/repad.v2i2.6187

Ribeiro, G. M., Júnior, & Alves, A, Filho. (2020). A percepção de alunos com deficiência sobre a gestão para a inclusão: o caso do IFPB–Campus João Pessoa/PB. Revista Interface-UFRN/CCSA ISSN Eletrônico 2237-7506, 17(especial), 238-258. http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9718-1711

Roberson, Q. M. (2006). Disentangling the meanings of diversity and inclusion in organizations. Group & Organization Management, 31(2), 212-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601104273064

Rocha, A. D., & Silva, J. F. D. (2008). Inclusão social e marketing na base da pirâmide: uma agenda de pesquisa. RAE eletrônica, 7. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1676-56482008000200007

Santiago, A. L. S., de Barros, E. T. P., & Bonfim, M. P. (2019). O vale contábil: uma análise da perspectiva de profissionais LGBTI+ sobre o mercado de trabalho. Cadernos de Gênero e Tecnologia, 12(39), 240-257. https://doi.org/10.3895/cgt.v12n39.9570

Santos, L. S. (2021). Diversidade e Inclusão no Ambiente Contábil: um estudo bibliométrico. Universidade Federal de Goiás UFG. XV Congresso Anpcont. Evento virtual.

Saraiva, L. A. S., & Irigaray, H. A. R. (2009). Políticas de Diversidade nas Organizações: uma questão de discurso? Revista de Administração de Empresas, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-75902009000300008

Sassaki, R. K. (2005). Inclusão: construindo uma sociedade para todos. (6th. ed.). WVA.

Scientific Periodicals Electronic Library. (2012). Spell. http://www.spell.org.br/sobre/caracteristicas

Silva, C. A. G., Bitencourt, C. C., Zanandrea, G., & Froehlich, C. (2020). Proposição de um modelo teórico de Inovação Social para Inclusão de Imigrantes Senegaleses no Mercado de Trabalho. Revista Capital Científico-Eletrônica (RCCҽ), 18(2), 118-130.

Silveira, N. S. P. D., & Hanashiro, D. M. M. (2009). Similaridade e dissimilaridade entre superiores e subordinados e suas as implicações para a qualidade da relação diádica. Revista de Administração Contemporânea, 13, 117-135. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-65552009000100008

Sonza, I. B., & Valcanover, V. M. (2019). Can Gender Diversity Influence Liquidity and Risk of Companies? A Diversidade de Gênero Pode Afetar a Liquidez e o Risco de Companhias? Revista BASE, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.4013/base.2019.164.05

Souza, M. J., Salvagni, J., Nodari, C. H., & Rasia, I. C. R. B. (2017). Inclusão de pessoas com deficiência: Das políticas públicas ao preconceito. Revista Alcance, 24(1), 022-035.

Souza, N. S. (2021). Tornar-se negro ou as vicissitudes da identidade do negro brasileiro em ascensão social. Zahar.

Teixeira, J. C., Oliveira, J. S., Diniz, A., & Marcondes, M. M. (2021). Inclusão e diversidade na administração: manifesta para o futuro-presente. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 61(3). https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-759020210308

Thomas, R. R., Júnior (1990). From affirmative action to affirmative diversity. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 107-117.

Wailes, N., & Michelson, G. (2008). The transfer of management ideas to a wetern “periphery”: the case of corporate social responsibility in Australia. International Studies of Management and Organization, 38(4), 100-118. https://doi.org/10.2753/IMO0020-8825380405

Werneck, C. (2000). Ninguém mais vai ser bonzinho: na sociedade inclusiva. (2nd. ed.). WVA.

Werneck, C. (2003). Você é gente? O direito de nunca ser questionado sobre seu valor humano. (2nd. ed.). WVA.

Zanelli, J. C., Borges-Andrade, J. E., & Bastos, A. V. B. (2014). Psicologia, organizações e trabalho no Brasil. (2nd. ed.). Artmed.

Información adicional

Special Call: (In)Equality, Diversity and Inclusion – Organizational and Accounting Approaches: Guest editors: Carlos Adriano Santos Gomes Gordiano, Sandra Maria Cerqueira da Silva & Joao Paulo Resende de Lima