Systematic review
Received: 30 November 2018
Accepted: 01 June 2019
DOI: 10.15446/revfacmed.v68n4.76519
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of occupational diseases in the agricultural sector is higher than in other industries, since agricultural workers are at higher risk of exposure to different chemicals and pesticides, and are more prone to occupational accidents.
Objective: To conduct a review of recent literature on occupational health and risk in agriculture.
Materials and methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, SciencieDirect and Scopus using the following search strategy: type of articles: original research papers; publication language: English; publication period: 2006-2016; search terms: "agricultural health", "agrarian health", "risk factors", "epidemiology", "causality" and "occupational", used in different combinations ("AND" and "OR").
Results: The search yielded 350 articles, of which 102 met the inclusion criteria. Moreover, 5 articles were found in grey literature sources and included in the final analysis. Most research on this topic has been conducted in the United States, which produced 91% (97/107) of the articles included in the review.
Conclusions: Most studies on agricultural health focused primarily on the harmful effects of occupational exposure to agrochemicals and pesticides, and the consequences of occupational accidents. However, since more than 90% of these studies come from USA, a more comprehensive approach to agricultural health is required, since what is reported here may be far from the reality of other regions, especially Latin America.
Keywords: Agricultural Workers' Diseases, Agrochemicals, Occupational Health, Wounds and Injuries (MeSH).
Resumen
Introducción. : En el sector agrícola la prevalencia de enfermedades profesionales es más alta que en otras industrias, ya que los agricultores, debido a las actividades que deben realizar, tienen un mayor riesgo de exposición a diferentes químicos y pesticidas, y son más propensos a sufrir accidentes laborales.
Objetivo. : Realizar una revisión de la literatura sobre salud y riesgo ocupacional en el sector agrícola.
Materiales y métodos. : Se realizó una búsqueda de la literatura en PubMed, SciencieDirect y Scopus. Se utilizó la siguiente estrategia de búsqueda: tipo de artículos: investigaciones originales; idioma: inglés; periodo de publicación: 2006-2016; términos de búsqueda: "agricultural health", "agrarian health", "risk factors", "epidemiology", "causality" y "occupational", usados en diferentes combinaciones ("AND" y "OR").
Resultados. : La búsqueda arrojó 350 artículos, de los cuales 102 cumplieron los criterios de inclusión. Además, se agregaron 5 artículos encontrados en fuentes de literatura gris. El país en el que más se ha investigado sobre este tema es EE. UU., ya que produjo el 91% (97/107) de los artículos incluidos.
Conclusiones. : La mayoría de estudios se centró en los efectos de la exposición ocupacional a químicos y pesticidas y las consecuencias de los accidentes laborales; sin embargo, ya que más del 90% de estos proviene de EE. UU., se requiere una discusión más integral sobre la salud en la agricultura, pues lo reportado aquí puede distar mucho de la realidad de otras regiones, especialmente de Latinoamérica.
Palabras clave: Agroquímicos, Enfermedades de los Trabajadores Agrícolas, Heridas y traumatismos, Salud laboral (DeCS).
Introduction
It is widely believed that many important human diseases originated with the advent of agriculture.1 Nowadays, there are legislative instruments to regulate health in the agricultural sector, as well as established concepts explaining what both human and animal health entail for such sector. For example, when addressing safety and health in agriculture, the International Labor Organization (ILO) defines agricultural health as the promotion of a safe and healthy environment for human beings that take part in farming activities;2 in addition, according to the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), agricultural health is the primary health of animals, plants, products and by-products obtained from both sources, soil, water, air, and people, and the close relationship between them, which incorporates agro-ecological science principles to promote food security and sovereignty, and popular participation through the formulation, implementation and monitoring of policies, plans and programs for the prevention, control, and eradication of pests and diseases.3
Likewise, the National Cancer Institute, the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States, within the framework of the Agricultural Health Study,4 have conducted several studies where the main objective was to evaluate agricultural health, understood as the interaction between agricultural exposures and the development of cancer and other diseases in agricultural workers.4
In comparison with other industries, agriculture provides a significant amount of jobs worldwide. Nearly 40% (450 million) of workers are in the farming sector and represent more than 40% of total agricultural labor force.5 In 2016, 40% of the total population of developing countries worked in the agricultural sector or in agriculture-related activities, while in developed and industrialized countries, only 3% of their population did it.6 However, even in industrialized countries, this sector constitutes a significant portion of the total workforce.
It has been estimated that by 2013 there were about 12 million farms in the 27 European Union member countries, with an average extension of 14.2 hectares, of which, 95% were family farms.7,8 In the case of Central and North America, in 2010, there were around 4 million farms in Mexico occupying 932 149 million hectares of land, while in USA, there were 2.32 million farms using about 56 667 million hectares;9 likewise, in Canada, around 64 232 million hectares were used as agricultural land by 205 000 farms in 2011.10 Regarding Oceania, in 2014 there were 135 000 farms in Australia using around 394 million hectares of land,11 while in New Zealand, nearly 78 549 farms were found in approximately 555 000 hectares by 2012.12 Finally, in countries such as Brazil, about 33.81% of the land was used for agricultural purposes, and approximately 21 203 million hectares of land were used for cereal production, according to data reported for 2015.6
Similarly, according to the ILO, about 317 million people worldwide suffer from occupational accidents, and 2.34 million die due to occupational accidents and diseases.2 In Latin America, about 11.1 fatal accidents take place for every 100 000 workers in the industrial sector, while in the agriculture industry and the agricultural services provision services sector, there are about 10.7 and 6.9 fatal accidents for every 100 000 workers.13 In addition, in some countries, several important economic sectors such as mining, construction, agriculture, and fishery have the highest incidence of occupational accidents. In this regard, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, in 2013 the injury rate of agricultural workers exceeded the 40%, being the highest among all industries; also injury rates in crop production and animal production workers were 5.5 and 6.7 for every 100 workers, respectively. In contrast, injury rate in workers from all industries was 3.8/100.14
In 2013, 479 occupational deaths were reported within the agricultural industry in USA, that is, a fatality ratio of 22.2/100 000, which is significantly higher than the 3.2/100 000 ratio reported for all occupations in the same country.15 Somehow, occupational deaths in the agricultural sector in other countries are significantly lower. For example, in Canada and Finland death ratios for 2013 were 11.6/100 000 and 6.5/10 000, respectively.16,17
Regarding, non-fatal injuries and diseases, monitoring them is a more challenging task, given the scarcity of data and population based studies. In USA, the non-fatal injury rate in agricultural workers ranged from 5/100 000 to 170/100 000 between 2002 and 2017.15,18,19 When it comes to occupational diseases in the agricultural sector, these are even more difficult to quantify since they are rarely associated with situations happening at the workplace, and in fact, there is not any reporting mechanism in USA.
According to surveys conducted by the Bureau of Labor Statistics in 2014, occupational disease rate in agricultural workers from USA was 3.1/1 000.15 However, sensitivity and specificity of these data need to be considered when taking into account such reports, since they greatly depend on the information provided by employers. In said country, most occupational diseases are skin problems (56%), chronic traumas (14%) and respiratory problems (13%). On the other hand, in Finland, an occupational diseases ratio of 6.4/1 000 in this sector has been reported, out of which 40% represent respiratory disorders, 21%, skin problems, and 31%, joint disorders.20,21
However, most studies on occupational health and safety in agriculture carried out in recent years have focused on workers inhabiting industrialized countries going through rapid socioeconomic and political changes.22
In developing countries, the rapid emergence of industries such as chemical production, car manufacturing, and agriculture has resulted in fewer safety regulations compared to developed countries, which in turn has worsened their existing environmental and occupational problems.23 In this sense, there is strong evidence that there is a correlation between health condition and socioeconomic status, and that, in general, people's health in low-income countries is affected by several factors, including environmental, cultural, and socioeconomic conditions .23,24
Other public health problems affecting these countries include outbreaks of zoonotic diseases and of infections caused, on the one hand, by enteric pathogens due to the consumption of contaminated food, and, on the other, by antimicrobial-resistant organisms acquired in animal production activities.25 Therefore, in these countries, many of environmental, occupational, and public health problems are affected by the global economy and are too complex to understand, thus their mitigation requires jointly actions by both, actors from several disciplines, and representatives of the different industries.
Since most studies on agricultural health conducted in developing countries focus on small rural communities, further research on this topic in these countries with a broader scope is urgently required. Taking the above into account, the aim of this paper was to conduct a review of recent literature on occupational health and risk in agriculture.
Materials and methods
In April 2016, a systematic review was carried out in the ScienceDirect, Scopus and PubMed databases based on the PRISMA guidelines for conducting systematic reviews,26 and the methodology proposed by Cardona.27 Exhaustivity was guaranteed by using non-DeCS (Descriptors of Health Sciences) descriptors as search terms. Also, sensitivity was ensured using descriptors registered in the DeCS orthe Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) thesauruses as search terms. The combination of Boolean operators, based on the research question, provided specificity. The "agricultural health "OR" agrarian health" general search path was used alone or combined with the terms "risk factors" OR "epidemiology" OR "causality" OR "Occupational" through the following operators "AND ALL" or "AND". Inaddition,"2006to present","Published 2006 to present"and"published in the last 10 years" publication time filters were used in the searches conducted in ScienceDirect, Scopus, and PubMed, respectively, thus the search included scientific literature published between April 2006 and April 2016.
The specific search combinations used in each database are shown below:
ScienceDirect: TITLE-ABSTR-KEY ("agricultural health" OR "agrarian health") and ALL ("risk factors" OR"epidemiology"OR"causality"OR"Occupational").
PubMed: (("agricultural health" [Title/Abstract] OR "agrarian health" [Title/Abstract]) AND ("risk factors" OR"epidemiology"OR"causality"OR"occupational").
Scopus: TITLE-ABS-KEY ("agricultural health" OR "agrarian health") AND ALL ("risk factors" OR"epide-miology" OR"causality" OR"occupational").
Finally, the citations of the studies retrieved in the searchers, together with their respective abstracts, were imported into the Thomson Reuters EndNote® software manager, 2011 Version, in order to remove duplicate references.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria
Only research articles written in English and published between April 2006 and April 2016 were considered forinclusion. Studies that were finally included for full analysis were required to follow a methodology that allowed the extraction of elements useful in the definition of the concept of agricultural health. Otherarticles that provided empirical evidence, based on retrospective and prospective findings, regarding agricultural health were also considered. On the other hand, studies in which the units of analysis were in vitro models, cells or those that were conducted only in laboratories were excluded. In orderto ensure the reproducibility of the review, two researchers independently conducted the searches and selected the articles to be included forfull analysis. Disagreements were solved through consensus.
The following data were extracted from all studies included in the review, and then entered into an information collection form fortheiranalysis: general information (title, name of the journal in which the article was published, year of publication, and country in which the study was conducted); agricultural health topics addressed in the paper (occupational exposure to pesticides orto chemical products, agricultural health and safety, medical training and agricultural health); study type (retrospective, prospective, cohort, qualitative, exploratory, cross-sectional, case- control study), and the organizations involved in the making of each study (academic institutions, public institutions and government agencies).
Results
A total of 350 studies were retrieved after the initial search was carried out (ScienceDirect 23, Scopus 160, and PubMed 167). Once duplicates (n=180) were removed, 43 publications were excluded for full-text reading since, based on the reading of titles and abstracts, it was decided they did not meet the established inclusion criteria and did not provide useful information for the objective of the review. Out of the 127 studies selected for full-text reading, 25 were excluded based on the established exclusion criteria. Finally, 102 articles were included forfull analysis. In addition, 5 studies that were published in journals that were not indexed in the databases but met the inclusion criteria were also included. It should be noted that these 5 gray literature studies were retrieved from Google Scholar. The studies screening and selection process is shown in Figure 1.
Despite the 107 studies were conducted in 11 countries, most of them (n=97) were carried out in USA, while the remaining 10 were conducted in the other 10 countries, including France and Canada. Furthermore, in the USA, studies were mainly carried out in the following States: California, Colorado, Iowa, North Carolina, Kentucky, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin.
Table 1 shows the journals, in a descending order, in which the studies were published; data regarding impact factor, publishing house, year, country and frequency of publication, and field of study of each journal are also shown. The journals in which most studies included were published were the Journal of Agromedicine, Environmental Health Perspective (n=22), and Environmental Health Perspective (n=19).

USA was the most frequent country of publication, followed by the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. Environmental Health Perspective had the highest impact factor for 2015 (8.44), followed by Journal of Cancer (5.531) (Table 1).
Agricultural health topics addressed in the studies
Agricultural health concepts addressed in the 107 stud- shown in Table 2. Concepts were classified into seven ies, and inferred by us based on their full analysis, are categories.

Some of the agricultural health topics addressed in the studies reviewed include several occupational factors associated with the development of physical diseases such as age, workforce management, ethnicity, types of products used by workers in farms, work practices, agricultural machinery engineering controls, and the use of personal protection equipment, among others.28,30,32,39,42,44 It should be noted that workforce varies significantly from one region to another. Also, the number of permanent employees working outside the farms has increased, which means a greater exposure to occupational risks.45
Furthermore, in USA, according to the 2014 Census of Agriculture, conducted by the United States Department of Agriculture, the average age of farm workers was 54.3 years, which may increase their susceptibility to the adverse effects of occupational exposure, for example, an increased risk of developing chronic diseases affecting the respiratory and the locomotor systems.46
Discussion
Agriculture is one of the most dangerous industries for workers in both, developing and developed countries.1 In comparison with other industries, occupational accidents, chemical exposure, and fatality rates are higher in farm workers, and resources available for their compensation are scarce.7,20,24,45
One of the main challenges of occupational health and safety in agriculture is that a wide variety of working activities are carried out in this sector, which, unlike in other industries, makes it necessary to develop and implement interventions aimed at these many activities. In addition, the monitoring of farm workers' health condition and the reporting systems of work-related injuries are inadequate and non-standardized. For example, according to the ILO, official data on the incidence of occupational accidents and work-related diseases in agricultural workers are inaccurate, notoriously underestimated and insufficient as indicators to measure the effect of occupational health and safety interventions.2,13 In recent decades, the interest in agricultural health has increased worldwide, particularly in the field of occupational safety and health. This has led to positive changes in national policies on working practices in the agricultural sector, and the involvement and jointly effort of public agencies, social organizations, occupational health experts, the academy, agriculture companies, unions, and public and private insurance companies.6,14 Also, both research and prevention actions regarding occupational health and safety in agriculture have increased significantly in the last decade, since more support has been given to this field of study by different academic institutions, private organizations, and government agencies that has resulted in the creation of academic programs aimed at improving agricultural safety and health (ASH), as well as the foundation or involvement of existing institutions in the research of ASH (Tables 3 and 4). However, these initiatives have only been considered in recent years, and so far, most of them have been implemented in developed countries such as USA, Canada, and France.


Somehow, the situation in Latin-America is different. According to the ILO, while 59% of the total population in this region are engaged in farming activities, per year there are around 250 million accidents affecting both permanent and temporary workers. National regulations in Latin-American countries concerning safety at work are often too general and vague. In addition, in some of these countries, this situation is worsened due to the exclusion of the agricultural sector and farm workers from workers' compensation insurance systems. Generally, agriculture is classified by these systems in their global statistical estimates as part of other industries such as forestry and fishing, which translates into the underreport of occupational accidents in this sector.2,13
Health problems associated with the exposure to agrochemicals
Systemic diseases
Between 29% and 44% of agricultural workers experience skin or respiratory diseases associated with exposure to agrochemicals47-54 and scarce use of personal protective equipment while handling chemicals.5,55
Generally, skin is the organ most affected in workers exposed to these substances.56 Headaches (90%), skin rashes (85%), eye irritation (43%) and fatigue (23%) have also been reported as symptoms related to the exposure to agrochemicals.57 Likewise, more than half of workers report experiencing any of these or similar symptoms after prolonged exposure to agrochemicals, and out of these, only half affirm they receive any form of assistance for medical treatment.29,47,58,59 In addition, respiratory and flu-like symptoms have been associated with the exposure to agrochemicals among agricultural workers from Iowa after the application of insecticides on cattle, as well as skin reactions, mostly over hands and arms.31,33,37,60-62
Effects on pregnancy, fertility and fetal development
Based on the studies reviewed, there is an association between the use of thiocarbamates, carbaryl, and pesticides and a higher risk of spontaneous abortion; also preterm birth has been associated with the use of herbicide mixtures or sequential applications.17,63,64 On the other hand, there was not a consistent or strong pattern of association between being exposed to pesticides and altered pregnancy time.65-67 However, it has been described that women and men working in agricultural industries and women living in farms have a higher risk of infertility.68,69 Other birth defects related to the use of agrochemicals include oral and facial clefts70,71 and congenital anomalies.65
Organophosphate poisoning effects on farm workers' health
The serious outcomes regarding organophosphate poisoning in these workers have been well described, including organophosphate induced polyneuropathy (OPIDP), permanent neurological deficits, neuropsychiatric disorders, peripheral neuropathy, poor neuropsychiatric test results, and multiple chemical sensitivity.72-74
Mortality rates
Mortality rates due to exposure to agrochemicals in USA have declined markedly each year;17,38,75-78 hospitalizations and acute intoxications have also decreased since workers have been provided with better training, better technological devices, non-toxic mixtures formulations, and greater regulation and control policies which include the registration of the most toxic agents34,35,43,79 (Table 5).

Cancer and exposure to agrochemicals
Regarding associations between developing cancer and performing any type of agricultural activity, it has been reported that lip cancer occurs in 29% of agricultural workers.75,80,81 Also, it has been described that up to 19% farm workers, regardless of their sex, have been diagnosed with multiple myeloma, and that said condition has been associated with their occupational exposure.82-86 Other types of cancer observed in this population and that have been related to working in agriculture include non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (14%), prostate (14%), skin (7%), melanoma (6%), brain cancer (4%), and soft tissue sarcoma (3%).87-93
Additionally, some types of cancer have been associated with specific agricultural exposures, and evidence shows that their occurrence may be higher in certain subgroups of agricultural workers.94 For example, a greater association between exposure to herbicides such as a phenoxyacetic acid (e.g. 2,4 D) and having non-Hodkin's lymphoma has been described.82,95 Yet, regarding exposure to Atrazine , the most widely used herbicide in USA, there is no evidence of an increased risk of colon cancer, soft tissue sarcoma, Hodgkin's disease, multiple myeloma, or leukemia63,95-97 (Tables 5 and 6).

Finally, many types of cancer have been associated with agricultural exposures in both epidemiological and cohort studies, but results by some of these studies have been inconsistent and, thus, there is no consensus on their causality.
Farmers and agricultural workers are subject to multiple hazardous exposures to pesticides, fertilizers, paint fumes, solvents, welding fumes, dust, pathogens, and endotoxins.63,69,98,99 In general, most agricultural health studies have been conducted on permanent workers and, to a much lesser extent, on their partners. However, little research has been done regarding temporary agricultural workers, who may be subject to prolonged occupational exposures. Furthermore, these studies have generally focused on crop production workers, who are exposed to different pesticides (depending on the crops) only a few times per year.98 Somehow, it should be noted that the results obtained in this review may greatly depend on the heterogeneity of the studies, the type of study, the geographical area and the period in which they were conducted, and the limitations of each study regarding the assessment of agricultural exposures.
Other conditions associated with agricultural exposures
Different physiological conditions, injuries or mechanical traumas, and infections caused by microorganisms have been associated to some extent with agricultural work. For example, it has been reported that more than 50% of agricultural workers experience hearing loss.100 Also, the adoption of forced postures, the performance of repetitive movements and the manual handling of heavy loads have been associated with musculoskeletal disorders such as chronic back pain and low back pain, being more frequent in older men than in women (50% and 10%, respectively), and even with spontaneous miscarriages. 101
Furthermore, agricultural equipment operators are exposed to whole-body and hand-arm vibrations that cause them several health problems and health conditions, including tendinitis, tenosynovitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, degenerative changes of the spine, low back pain, herniated discs, and peripheral, vascular, gastrointestinal and vestibular nerves injuries. Likewise, excessive physical effort and fatigue as a result of using traditional farming tools and methods may increase the risk of occupational accidents.101
On the other hand, agricultural work-related respiratory disorders include occupational asthma, allergic rhinitis, chronic bronchitis, extrinsic allergic alveolitis (or hypersensitivity pneumonitis), which are mainly associated with working in closed areas such as nurseries and silos where workers are exposed to high concentrations of allergen dust, fumes, pollen, dust mites, and grain dust.40,102 According to some studies, chronic bronchitis is more prevalent in farmers compared to the general population. In this regard, it has been reported that most farmers with this disease have a history of exposure to grain dust or work in confined pig farms. Chronic bronchitis has also been described in farmers who grow cereals, especially during harvest time.40,103,104
Among infections caused by microorganisms as a result of working in agricultural activities, it has been described that both latent tuberculosis infection and tuberculosis disease (caused by the Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacterium) cases are increasing in the migrant workforce, mainly in Mexico and Central America, and that most of cases occur in the Mexico-United States border area.105,106 In addition, prevalence rates are significantly higher in communities living in said area. In that regard, Garfein et al.107 report the need to improve the diagnosis and the monitoring of TB cases, as well as to promote the successful completion of TB treatments in order to reduce the occurrence of multidrug-resistant TB cases.
According to the evidence found here, studies on agricultural health and safety address topics such as cancer screening, autoimmune, respiratory, neurological and reproductive diseases, allergic disorders, work-related injuries, and overall mortality rates and their association with a wide range of agricultural exposures. Most of these studies have been conducted in northern and southern mid-latitudes, mainly in USA, possibly because this country is one of the largest consumers of insecticides and agrochemicals in the world.6 In addition, 47% of the rural population in USA is engaged in some type of agricultural activity, and the US Government has acknowledged both, life and health sciences, as important factors for the Nation's economic growth, as well as the importance of increasing the quality of treatment provided to people who experience agricultural work-related injuries.22
Limitations
Due to their design, in a systematic review fewer studies may be included compared to a narrative review. Also, systematic reviews are observational and retrospective studies that are susceptible to biases.
Conclusions
In agricultural workers, exposure to pesticides and other agrochemicals is one of the main occupational hazards, which can lead to intoxication and death, and, in some cases, to occupational cancers and reproductive disorders. Likewise, poor compliance with safety and health regulations in this sector worsens this situation.
The absence of registers regarding infections and infectious diseases affecting both humans and animals has been so far addressed independently by several disciplines, but not in a holistic way, which may be leading to the underreport of occupational diseases in agricultural workers.
The existing studies on agricultural health have been conducted mainly in developed countries, particularly in USA, and most of them focus on the harmful effects resulting from occupational exposure to the handling of farm machinery, and on work-related traumas. However, an adequate approach to agricultural health requires further discussion and a wider scope, since what is reported by said studies may be far from the reality of other regions, especially Latin America, where workers' agricultural health may be conditioned by several factors including weather, fauna, population density, living conditions, level of schooling, professional background, technological development, and health care services quality.
Even if systematics reviews have some limitations, results obtained here show that it is a useful tool for the identification of predominant research topics within a certain field of study. Further research should focus on studying agricultural health in other regions of the world and in the different production systems.
It is worth noting that in Latin America, most agricultural research is carried out by government and federal government agencies, which makes it difficult to access information regarding agricultural health in these countries.
Acknowledgments
None stated by the authors.
References
Eshed V, Gopher A, Pinhasi R, Hershkovitz I. Paleopathology and the origin of agriculture in the levant. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2010;143(1):121-33. https://doi.org/fng47g.
Oficina Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). Seguridad y Salud en la Agricultura. Ginebra: OIT; 2014 [cited 2016 Jun 2016]. Avalaible from: Avalaible from: https://bit.ly/3m3Ew3S.
República Bolivariana de Venezuela. Ley de Salud Agrícola Integral. Caracas: Gaceta Oficial 5890; julio 31 de 2008 [cited 2016 Apr 14]. Available from: Available from: https://bit.ly/39YfdgB.
National Institutes of Health (NIH). Agricultural Health Study. NIH; 2011 [cited 2016 Aug 15]. Available from: Available from: https://bit.ly/2KcYVWx.
Hurts P, Termine P, Karl M. Agricultural workers and their contribution to sustainable agriculture and rural development. Ginebra: International Labour Office; Food and Agriculture Organization, International Union of Food, Agricultural, Hotel, Restaurant, Catering, Tobacco and Allied Workers' Associations; 2007.
The World Bank. Employment in agriculture (% of total employment) (modeked ILO estimate). The World Bank Group; 2014 [cited 2016 Jun 18]. Avalaible from: Avalaible from: https://bit.ly/2Heyn61.
Matthews A. Family farming and the role of policy in the EU. CAP Reform; 2013 [cited 2016 Jun 18]. Availabre from: Availabre from: https://bit.ly/37j5aBD.
Eurostat Year Book 2004. European Commission. The statistical guide to Europe 1992-2002. European Comunities; 2004 [cited 2016 Jun 19]. Avalaible from: Avalaible from: https://bit.ly/2INu5TB.
Gobierno de México. Servicio de Información Agroalimentaria y Pesquera. México de D.F. [cited 20202 Dec 10]. Available from: Available from: https://bit.ly/39ZuX2U.
tatistics Canada. 2016 Census of agriculture. 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 10]. Availabre from: Availabre from: https://bit.ly/3m5HeWe.
ustralian Bureau of Statistics. Agricultural Commodities, Australia, 2014-15. Australian Bureau of Statistics; 2016 [cited 2016 Jul 21]. available from: available from: https://bit.ly/34be69Z.
tats NZ Tatauranga Aotearoa. New Zealand Government; 2012 [cited 2016 Jul 17]. Available from: Available from: https://bit.ly/3n69j0T.
ficina Internacional del Trabajo (OIT). Salud y seguridad en el trabajo en América Latina y el Caribe. OIT; 2016 [cited 2016 Apr 28]. Avalaible from: Avalaible from: https://bit.ly/2HoKw7W.
nited States of America. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). Employer-reported workplace injuries and illnesses - 2012. BLS; 2013 [cited2015 Mar 1. Available from: Available from: https://bit.ly/3ozblqq.
nited States Department of Labor. Injures, Illnesses and Fatalities. Washington D.C.: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; 2014 [cited 2016 Aug 5. Available from: Available from: https://bit.ly/3o7Hzd5.
ickett W, Hartling L, Brison RJ, Guernsey JR. Fatal work-related farm injuries in Canada, 1991-1995. CMAJ. 1999;160(13):1843-8.
aggoner JK, Kullman GJ, Henneberger PK, Umbach DM, Blair A, Alavanja MCR, et al. Mortality in the agricultural health study, 1993-2007. Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(1):71-83. https://doi.org/bpxsh7.
amalainen P, Takala J, Saarela KL. Global estimates of fatal work-related diseases. Am J Ind Med. 2007;50(1):28-41. https://doi.org/c6kvk5.
autiainen RH, Reynolds SJ. Mortality and morbidity in agriculture in the United States. J Agric Saf Health. 2002;8(3):259-76. https://doi.org/fd6f.
innunen B, Manninen P, Taattola K. Factors associated with farmers joining occupational health services. Occup Med (Chic Ill). 2009;59(4):273-6. https://doi.org/bwqswr.
aattola K, Rautiainen RH, Karttunen JP, Suutarinen J, Viluksela MK, Louhelainen K, et al. Risk factors for occupational injuries among full-time farmers in Finland. J Agric Saf Health. 2012;18(2):83-93. https://doi.org/f3z6pc.
steen CD, Fernandez-Cornejo J. Economic and policy issues of U.S. agricultural pesticide use trends. Pest Manag Sci. 2013;69(9):1001-25. https://doi.org/f5cbfr.
eigh JP, Du J, McCurdy SA. An estimate of the U.S. government's undercount of nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses in agriculture. Ann Epidemiol. 2014;24(4):254-9. https://doi.org/f5ws7f.
eigh JP, McCurdy SA, Schenker MB. Costs of occupational injuries in agriculture. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(3):235-48. https://doi.org/brz568.
cDermott JJ, Grace D. Agriculture-associated diseases: Adapting agriculture to improve human health. Nairobi: International Livestock Research Institute; 2011.
rrútia G, Bonfill X. Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Med Clin (Barc). 2010;135(11):507-11. https://doi.org/bqnp58.
ardona-Arias JA, Gutierrez-Higuita LF, Ríos-Osorio LA. Revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura científica: la investigación teórica como principio para el desarrollo de la ciencia básica y aplicada. Bogotá D.C. Ediciones Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia; 2016. https://doi.org/fd6g.
lair A, Thomas K, Coble J, Sandler DP, Hines CJ, Lynch F, et al. Impact of pesticide exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risks in the agricultural health study. Occup Environ Med. 20113;68(7):537-41. https://doi.org/d42n6w.
onner MR, Williams BA, Rusiecki JA, Blair A, Beane-Freeman LE, Hoppin JA, et al. Occupational exposure to terbufos and the incidence of cancer in the Agricultural Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(6):871-7. https://doi.org/dkt2xb.
umann MJ, Sanderson WT, Gerr F, Kelly KM, Merchant JA. Effects of common agricultural tasks on measures of hearing loss. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(10):904-16. https://doi.org/f4bg4z.
eane-Freeman LE, Deroos AJ, Koutros S, Blair A, Ward MH, Alavanja M, et al. Poultry and livestock exposure and cancer risk among farmers in the agricultural health study. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23(5):663-70. https://doi.org/f3xn82.
ower T, Fragar L, Temperley J. Agricultural health and safety performance in Australia. J Agromedicine. 2011; 6(4):292-8. https://doi.org/fmqvdz.
aewboonchoo O, Kongtip P, Woskie S. Occupational health and safety for agricultural workers in Thailand: gaps and recommendations, with a focus on pesticide use. New Solut. 2015;25(1):102-20. https://doi.org/fd6x.
ariger SC, Grisso RD, Perumpral JV, Sorenson AW, Christensen NK, Miller RL. Virginia agricultural health and safety survey. J Agric Saf Health. 2009;15(1):37-47. https://doi.org/fd6z.
uin SM, Wheat JR, Allinder RS, Fanucchi GJ, Wiggins OS, Johnson GJ. Participatory research and service-learning among farmers, health professional students, and experts: an agromedicine approach to farm safety and health. J Agromedicine. 2012;17(1):22-9. https://doi.org/fzd3bv.
arcum JL, Browning SR, Reed DB, Charnigo RJ. Farmwork-related injury among farmers 50 years of age and older in Kentucky and South Carolina: A cohort study, 2002-2005. J Agric Saf Health. 2011;17(3):259-73. https://doi.org/f3whdj.
rcury TA, Grzywacz JG, Talton JW, Chen H, Vallejos QM, Galván L, et al. Repeated pesticide exposure among North Carolina migrant and seasonal farmworkers. Am J Ind Med. 2010;53(8):802-13. https://doi.org/ch687r.
lower KB, Hoppin JA, Shore DL, Lynch CF, Blair A, Knott C, et al. Causes of mortality and risk factors for injury mortality among children in the agricultural health study. J Agromedicine. 2006;11(3-4):47-59.
prince NL, Zwerling C, Whitten PS, Lynch CF, Burmeister LF, Gillette PP, et al. Farm Activities Associated with Eye Injuries in the Agricultural Health Study. J Agromedicine. 2008;13(1):17-22. https://doi.org/crhvwm.
oppin JA, Umbach DM, London SJ, Lynch CF, Alavanja MCR, Sandler DP. Pesticides and adult respiratory outcomes in the agricultural health study. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006;1076:343-54. https://doi.org/ctzx5v.
cElroy KG. Environmental Health Effects of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations: implications for nurses. Nurs Adm Q. 2010;34(4):311-9. https://doi.org/ghfpf5.
agel LM, Pickett W, Pahwa P, Day L, Brison RJ, Marlenga B, et al. Prevention of agricultural injuries: an evaluation of an education-based intervention. Inj Prev. 2008;14(5):290-5. https://doi.org/brfvsx.
apadopoulou SC. Practices of Greek farmers in the application of insecticides and other crop protection chemicals: Individual and public health safety parameters. Outlook on Agriculture. 2011;40(4):307-12. https://doi.org/fzzpv7.
line A, Leedom-Larson K, Donham KJ, Rautiainen R, Schneiders S. Farmer Assessment of the Certified Safe Farm Program. J Agromedicine. 2008;12(3):33-43. https://doi.org/ct7z3j.
eporati M, Salcedo S, Jara B, Boero V, Muñoz M. La agricultura familiar en cifras. In: Salcedo S, Guzmán L, editors. Agricultura familiar en América Latina y el Caribe: Recomendaciones de Política. Santiago de Chile: Organización de las Naciones Unidas; 2014 [cited 2020 Oct 20]. p. 35. Avalaible from: Avalaible from: https://bit.ly/37nlqRV.
nited States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2014 Census of Horticultural Specialties. USDA; 2014 [cited 2020 Dec 10]. Avalaible from: Avalaible from: https://bit.ly/3n5nbZe.
hapel D, Scribani M, Krupa N, Shaw B, Bell E, Jenkins P. Assessing the Implications of Contradictory Farm Exposure Data in an Aging Rural Population. J Agromedicine 2014;19(3):258-67. https://doi.org/fd63.
acfarlane E, Carey R, Keegel T, El-Zaemay S, Fritschi L. Dermal exposure associated with occupational end use of pesticides and the role of protective measures. Saf Health Work. 2013;4(3):136-41. https://doi.org/gfwcrk.
ennis LK, Lowe JB, Lynch CF, Alavanja MCR. Cutaneous melanoma and obesity in the Agricultural Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2008;18(3):214-21. https://doi.org/bkjgv5.
onham KJ, Larabee B. The changing face of agricultural health and safety-alternative agriculture. J Agromedicine. 2009;14(1):70-5. https://doi.org/d5d6d9.
ennis LK, Lynch CF, Sandler DP, Alavanja MCR. Pesticide Use and Cutaneous Melanoma in Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Heath Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2010;118(6):812-7. https://doi.org/dr94k2.
reeman LB. Evaluation of agricultural exposures: the Agricultural Health Study and the Agricultural Cohort Consortium. Rev Environ Health. 2009;24(4):311-8. https://doi.org/dps9s2.
lager RE, Poole JA, LeVan TD, Sandler DP, Alavanja MCR, Hoppin JA. Rhinitis associated with pesticide exposure among commercial pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Occup Environ Med. 2009;66(11):718-24. https://doi.org/dmzvpd.
piller HA, Aleguas A. Agricultural chemical exposure in small farmers in Guyana. Toxicol Environ Chem. 2008;90(2):361-5. https://doi.org/cm3szv.
ella Valle CT, Hoppin JA, Hines CJ, Andreotti G, Alavanja MCR. Risk-accepting personality and personal protective equipment use within the Agricultural Health Study. J Agromedicine. 2012;17(3):264-76. https://doi.org/fd65.
ngel LS, Satagopan J, Sima CS, Orlow I, Mujumdar U, Coble J, et al. Sun exposure, vitamin D receptor genetic variants, and risk of breast cancer in the agricultural health study. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(2):165-71. https://doi.org/fd66.
ones RR, Barone-Adesi F, Koutros S, Lerro CC, Blair A, Lubin J, et al. Incidence of solid tumours among pesticide applicators exposed to the organophosphate insecticide diazinon in the Agricultural Health Study: an updated analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72(7):496-503. https://doi.org/fd67.
alvert GM, Lee K, Roh S, Davis KG, Tak S. Promoting and protecting worker health and safety in the Republic of Korea agricultural sector. J Agromedicine. 2012;17(3):326-37. https://doi.org/fd68.
rouwer M, Schinasi L, Beane-Freeman LE, Baldi I, Lebailly P, Ferro G, et al. Assessment of occupational exposure to pesticides in a pooled analysis of agricultural cohorts within the AGRICOH consortium. Occup Environ Med. 2016;73(6):359-67. https://doi.org/f8qq9v.
prince N, Park H, Zwerling C, Whitten P, Lynch C, Burmeister L, et al. Risk Factors for Low Back Injury Among Farmers in Iowa: A Case-Control Study Nested in the Agricultural Health Study. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007;4(1):10-6. https://doi.org/crdxq9.
ell EM, Sandler DP, Alavanja MC. High pesticide exposure events among farmers and spouses enrolled in the Agricultural Health Study. J Agric Saf Health. 2006;12(2):101-16. https://doi.org/fd69.
rawford JM, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MCR, Blair A, Sandler DP, Kamel F. Hearing loss among licensed pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. J Occup Environ Med. 2008;50(7):817-26. https://doi.org/c63hvj.
eane-Freeman LE, Rusiecki JA, Hoppin JA, Lubin JH, Koutros S, Andreotti G, et al. Atrazine and cancer incidence among pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study (19942007). Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(9):1253-9. https://doi.org/fg94tm.
elancey JOL, Alavanja MCR, Coble J, Blair A, Hoppin JA, Austin HD, et al. Occupational Exposure to Metribuzin and the Incidence of Cancer in the Agricultural Health Study. Ann Epidemiol. 2009;19(6):388-95. https://doi.org/czpfvb.
athyanarayana S, Basso O, Karr CJ, Lozano P, Alavanja M, Sandler DP, et al. Maternal pesticide use and birth weight in the agricultural health study. J Agromedicine. 2010;15(2):127-36. https://doi.org/dn8bf8.
aldana TM, Basso O, Baird DD, Hoppin JA, Weinberg CR, Blair A, et al. Pesticide exposure and hypertensive disorders during pregnancy. Environ Health Perspect. 2009;117(9):1393-6. https://doi.org/fkm26t.
aldana TM, Basso O, Hoppin JA, Baird DD, Knott C, Blair A, et al. Pesticide exposure and self-reported gestational diabetes mellitus in the Agricultural Health Study. Diabetes Care. 2007;30(3):529-34. https://doi.org/btmnw7.
allmén M, Sandler DP, Hoppin JA, Blair A, Baird DD. Reduced fertility among overweight and obese men. Epidemiology. 2006;17(5):520-3. https://doi.org/b45k75.
allmen M, Baird DD, Hoppin JA, Blair A, Sandler DP. Fertility and exposure to solvents among families in the Agricultural Health Study. Occup Environ Med. 2006;63(7):469-75. https://doi.org/d6d7p7.
oppin JA, Adgate JL, Eberhart M, Nishioka M, Ryan PB. Environmental exposure assessment of pesticides in farmworker homes. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(6):929-35. https://doi.org/c7mvtp.
cCauley LA, Anger WK, Keifer M, Langley R, Robson MG, Rohlman D. Studying health outcomes in farmworker populations exposed to pesticides. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(6):953-60. https://doi.org/c3dv39.
avis MF, Kamel F, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MCR, Freeman LB, Gray GC, et al. Neurologic Symptoms Associated With Raising Poultry and Swine Among Participants in the Agricultural Health Study. J Occup Environ Med. 2011;53(2):190-5. https://doi.org/fprsfw.
amel F, Engel LS, Gladen BC, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MCR, Sandler DP. Neurologic symptoms in licensed private pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(7):877-82. https://doi.org/drtp6v.
egosen L, Davis MF, Silbergeld E, Breysse PN, Agnew J, Gray G, et al. Neurologic Symptoms Associated With Cattle Farming in the Agricultural Health Study. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54(10):1253-8. https://doi.org/f4b54w.
lavanja MCR, Ross MK, Bonner MR. Increased cancer burden among pesticide applicators and others due to pesticide exposure. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(2):120-42.https://doi.org/fd7f.
ills KT, Blair A, Freeman LEB, Sandler DP, Hoppin JA. Pesticides and Myocardial Infarction Incidence and Mortality Among Male Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170(7):892-900. https://doi.org/dbjdr4.
ee WJ, Alavanja MCR, Hoppin JA, Rusiecki JA, Kamel F, Blair A, et al. Mortality among Pesticide Applicators Exposed to Chlorpyrifos in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2007;115(4):528-34. https://doi.org/cwfckx.
eichenthal S, Villeneuve PJ, Burnett RT, van Donkelaar A, Martin RV, Jones RR, et al. Long-Term Exposure to Fine Particulate Matter: Association with Nonaccidental and Cardiovascular Mortality in the Agricultural Health Study Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122(6):609-15. https://doi.org/f597g5.
earney GD, Xu X, Balanay JAG, Allen DL, Rafferty AP. Assessment of personal protective equipment use among farmers in eastern North Carolina: a cross-sectional study. J Agromedicine. 2015;20(1):43-54. https://doi.org/fd7j.
outros S, Lynch CF, Ma X, Lee WJ, Hoppin JA, Christensen CH, et al. Heterocyclic aromatic amine pesticide use and human cancer risk: results from the U.S. Agricultural Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2009;124(5):1206-12. https://doi.org/bmbrcz.
an Leeuwen MT, Grulich AE, McDonald SP, McCredie MRE, Amin J, Stewart JH, et al. Immunosuppression and other risk factors for lip cancer after kidney transplantation. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18(2):561-9. https://doi.org/ckp9pj.
lavanja MCR, Hofmann JN, Lynch CF, Hines CJ, Barry KH, Barker J, et al. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Risk and Insecticide, Fungicide and Fumigant Use in the Agricultural Health Study. PLoS One. 2014;9(10):e109332. https://doi.org/fd77.
orahan T. Multiple myeloma and glyphosate use: A re-analysis of US agricultural health study (AHS) data. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(2):1548-59. https://doi.org/f63c99.
reenburg DL, Rusiecki J, Koutros S, Dosemeci M, Patel R, Hines CJ, et al. Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to captan in the Agricultural Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2008;19(10):1401-7. https://doi.org/c2ftb8.
andgren O, Kyle RA, Hoppin JA, Beane-Freeman LE, Cerhan JR, Katzmann JA, et al. Pesticide exposure and risk of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance in the Agricultural Health Study. Blood. 2009;113(25):6386-91. https://doi.org/bf77kc.
ofmann JN, Hoppin JA, Lynch CF, Poole JA, Purdue MP, Blair A, et al. Farm Characteristics, Allergy Symptoms, and Risk of Non-Hodgkin Lymphoid Neoplasms in the Agricultural Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015;24(3):587-94. https://doi.org/fd78.
arry KH, Koutros S, Lubin JH, Coble JB, Barone-Adesi F, Beane-Freeman LE, et al. Methyl bromide exposure and cancer risk in the Agricultural Health Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2012;23(6):807-18. https://doi.org/f3x5wv.
arami S, Andreotti G, Koutros S, Barry KH, Moore LE, Han S, et al. Pesticide Exposure and Inherited Variants in Vitamin D Pathway Genes in Relation to Prostate Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(9):1557-66.https://doi.org/fd79.
outros S, Beane-Freeman LE, Lubin JH, Heltshe SL, Andreotti G, Barry KH, et al. Risk of Total and Aggressive Prostate Cancer and Pesticide Use in the Agricultural Health Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2012;177(1):59-74. https://doi.org/f4hx8z.
vensson RU, Bannick NL, Marin MJ, Robertson LW, Lynch CF, Henry MD. Chronic Chlorpyrifos Exposure Does Not Promote Prostate Cancer in Prostate Specific PTEN Mutant Mice. J Environ Pathol Toxicol Oncol. 2013;32(1):29-39. https://doi.org/fd8c.
ou L, Andreotti G, Baccarelli AA, Savage S, Hoppin JA, Sandler DP, et al. Lifetime Pesticide Use and Telomere Shortening among Male Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2013;121(8):919-24. https://doi.org/f49hxz.
ang D, Park SK, Beane-Freeman L, Lynch CF, Knott CE, Sandler DP, et al. Cancer incidence among pesticide applicators exposed to trifluralin in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Res. 2008;107(2):271-6. https://doi.org/dwrs66.
erro CC, Koutros S, Andreotti G, Friesen MC, Alavanja MC, Blair A, et al. Organophosphate insecticide use and cancer incidence among spouses of pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72(10):736-44. https://doi.org/f7rs22.
an Bemmel DM, Visvanathan K, Beane-Freeman LE, Coble J, Hoppin JA, Alavanja MCR. S-Ethyl-N,N-dipropylthiocarbamate Exposure and Cancer Incidence among Male Pesticide Applicators in the Agricultural Health Study: A Prospective Cohort. Environ Health Perspect. 2008;116(11):1541-6. https://doi.org/d2qdgr.
ahajan R, Blair A, Lynch CF, Schroeder P, Hoppin JA, San-dler DP, et al. Fonofos exposure and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study. Environ Health Perspect. 2006;114(12):1838-42. https://doi.org/b5dd3v.
lapp RW, Jacobs MM, Loechler EL. Enviromentaland occupational causes of cancer: new evidence 2005-2007. Rev Env Heal. 2008;23(1):1-37. https://doi.org/dc36zt.
akke B, De Roos AJ, Barr DB, Stewart PA, Blair A, Freeman LB, et al. Exposure to atrazine and selected non-persistent pesticides among corn farmers during a growing season. J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2009;19(6):544-54. https://doi.org/ctm4xk.
urdue MP, Hoppin JA, Blair A, Dosemeci M, Alavanja MCR. Occupational exposure to organochlorine insecticides and cancer incidence in the Agricultural Health Study. Int J Cancer. 2007;120(3):642-49. https://doi.org/ckpcnw.
alcin M, Henneberger PK, Kullman GJ, Umbach DM, London SJ, Alavanja MCR, et al. Chronic Bronchitis Among Nonsmoking Farm Women in the Agricultural Health Study. J Occup Environ Med. 2007;49(5):574-83. https://doi.org/cmxpsz.
Rabinowitz PM, Sircar KD, Tarabar S, Galusha D, Slade MD. Hearing loss in migrant agricultural workers. J Agromedicine. 2005;10(4):9-17. https://doi.org/cjhr8n.
Das B. Agricultural work related injuries among the farmers of West Bengal, India. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2014;21(3):205-15. https://doi.org/fd8g.
Racine EF, Laditka SB, Dmochowski J, Alavanja MCR, Lee DC, Hoppin JA. Farming activities and carrying and lifting: The agricultural health study. J Phys Act Health. 2012;9(1):39-47. https://doi.org/fd8h.
Henneberger PK, Liang X, London SJ, Umbach DM, Sandler DP, Hoppin JA. Exacerbation of symptoms in agricultural pesticide applicators with asthma. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013;87(4):423-32. https://doi.org/f5zk2q.
Ye M, Beach J, Martin JW, Senthilselvan A. Occupational pesticide exposures and respiratory health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013;10(12):6442-71. https://doi.org/f5rpgb.
Mammone T, Metruccio FC, Vida P, Moretto A. The Italian system of data reporting in agriculture occupational health: a critical appraisal. J Public Health (Bangkok). 2007;15(4):301-13. https://doi.org/b5n4gg.
Hollenbeck JE. Interaction of the role of Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) in Emerging Infectious Diseases (EIDS). Infect Genet Evol. 2016;38:44-6. https://doi.org/fd8j.
Garfein RS, Burgos JL, Rodriquez-Lainz A, Brodine S, Pietrucha A, Rondinelli A, et al. Latent Tuberculosis Infection in a Migrant Agricultural Community in Baja California, Mexico. J Immigrant Minority Health. 2011;13(5):940-7. https://doi.org/d89phj.
Notes
Author notes
*Corresponding author: Leonardo Alberto Ríos-Osorio. Grupo Salud y Sostenibilidad, Escuela de Microbiología, Universidad de Antioquia. Calle 67 No. 53-108, Ciudad Universitaria, building: 5, office: 5-135. Telephone number: +57 4 2195492. Medellín. Colombia. Email: leonardo.rios@udea.edu.co.