Abstract: The vegetative performance of chrysanthemum var. Marigold with respect to phenophase based irrigation and fertigation schedule was evaluated. In the vegetative phase, the maximum plant height (62.44 cm), number of secondary branches per plant (42.65), number of primary branches per plant (10.85), leaf area (3793.81 cm2) was recorded in the treatment combination Whereas, the maximum average plant spread (47.98 cm) was in I1F4, number of leaves per plant (217.76) was in I3F1. Scheduling irrigation regime I3-(0.8 ER each at vegetative, bud and flowering phases) in combination with weekly application of (F4) 75:112.5:75 kg NPK/ha in three splits 40:20:20 % NPK (vegetative phase), 30:40:40 % NPK (bud phase) 30:40:40% NPK (flowering phase) through fertigation recorded maximum loose flower yield (26.27 t/ha) and this can be correlated with increased values for most of the vegetative parameters that directly influence the yield of the crop. Hence the above was observed best treatment over other treatment combinations with respect to vegetative parameters of chrysanthemum var. Marigold.
Keywords: Chrysanthemum var Marigold, fertigation, irrigation, phenophase and vegetative performance.
Original Research Papers
Influence of phenophase based irrigation and fertigation schedule on vegetative performance of chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzelev.) var. Marigold
Recepción: 05 Septiembre 2021
Revisado: 23 Septiembre 2021
Aprobación: 15 Enero 2022
Chrysanthemum (Dendranthema grandiflora Tzvelev.) is one of the important commercial flower crops in India as well as in the world. It is native of the Northern hemisphere, chiefly Europe and Asia. It belongs to family Asteraceae and is commonly called as the “Queen of the East”. Its flowers are valued for its long keeping quality, wide array of colours and different forms, which make it suitable for use in floral bouquets, flower arrangements and decorations. Chrysanthemum is the second most important flower crop after rose in India. The area under flower crops is 339000 ha with an overall production of 19.91 lakh tonnes. The leading chrysanthemum growing state is Karnataka with an area of 5453 ha and production of 59.54 thousand tonnes of loose flowers in 2017- 18 after Tamil Nadu. Water and fertilizer are the two vital inputs for crop production. Apart from the economic considerations, it is also well known that the injudicious use of water and fertilizer can have far reaching deleterious implications on the environment. Therefore, the need arises for technological options, which will help in sustaining the precious resources and maximizing crop production without any pernicious impact on the environment. Optimum plant nutrition is very essential in plant growth and development, if it is not in sufficient amount then it reduces the vigor of the plant and affects yield of flower crops by producing small leaves, light green or off-color foliage, fewer branches and poor flowering (Melvin and James, 2001). Excessive application of nutrients can cause adverse effects on plant growth, increase the potential for environmental contamination through leaching and waste of resources. Method of nutrient application to plants is also a key issue to get the optimum potential of the crop. Fertigation helps in reducing the wastage of nutrients through enhanced use efficiency of fertilizer besides providing flexibility in timing of fertilizer application in relation to crop demand based on phenological stages of growth (Papadopoulos, 1992). It also determines quantity of nutrients, timing of application and most important component of water distribution (Ahmad and Khan, 2017). The amount of nutrient and water requirement of a plant varies according to its phenophase and dispensation of water and nutrients can be scheduled accordingly. The fertigation scheduling should be based on plant, soil-air, plant water relations and growth stage of plant (Sankaranarayanan, 2007).
It is essential to work out an economically feasible and technologically efficient fertigation scheduling for optimum use of water and nutrients for enhanced water productivity with reference to different growth and developmental stages. Hence, it is important to evaluate under phenophase based irrigation and fertigation treatments for improving vegetative performance of chrysanthemum var. Marigold under open field condition.
The present investigation conducted during two seasons i.e. 2018 & 2019, at the Division of Flowers and Medicinal Crops, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR-IIHR), Bengaluru. The experimental site is situated in eastern dry zone of Karnataka state at 130 7´ north latitude, 770 29´ east longitudes and at an altitude of 890 meters above the mean sea level. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with fifteen treatment combinations along with three replications. The treatment consists of three main plot treatments at phenophases of vegetative phase i.e. I. – (0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 ER at vegetative, bud and flowering phases, respectively), I. - (0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 ER at vegetative, bud and flowering phases, respectively) and I.- (0.8 ER each at vegetative, bud and flowering phases) and five sub plot treatments (F1: 33.3:33.3:33.3 % NPK (vegetative phase), 33.3:33.3:33.3 % NPK (Bud phase) 33.3:33.3:33.3 % NPK (Flowering phase) @ 100:150:100 Kg NPK/ha (RDF), F2: 40:20:20 % NPK (vegetative phase), 30:40:40 % NPK (Bud phase ) 30:40:40% NPK (Flowering phase) @ 100:150:100 Kg NPK/ha (RDF), F3: 33.3:33.3:33.3 % NPK (vegetative phase), 33.3:33.3:33.3 % NPK (Bud phase ) 33.3:33.3:33.3 % NPK (Flowering phase @ 75:112.5:75 Kg NPK/ ha (75% RDF), F4: 40:20:20 % NPK (vegetative phase), 30:40:40 % NPK (Bud phase) 30:40:40% NPK (Flowering phase) @ 75:112.5:75 Kg NPK/ha (75% RDF), F.: Soil application of recommended dose of fertilizer (100:150:100 Kg NPK/ha) and F.-F.: 25% of fertilizer dose i.e. 100:150:100 and 75:112.5:75 kg NPK/ha was applied as basal dose. The previous day open pan evaporimeter observation was considered for scheduling the irrigation as per the treatment. The
irrigation schedule was calculated by using following formula.
The organic manure i.e. farmyard manure (20 t/ha) and basal application (Urea, DAP and MOP) was applied as per the treatments as earlier to transplanting. Transplanting was followed with a spacing of 60 cm × 45 cm. The dose of fertilizers was applied based on treatments through fertigation in the form of water-soluble fertilizers (Urea, MAP and SOP). The fertigation was given at weekly intervals from thirty days after transplanting to 120 days.
The vegetative parameters viz., plant height (cm), number of primary and secondary branches per plant, average plant spread (cm) at flowering and leaf area (cm2) as influenced by phenophase based different irrigation and fertigation regimes are discussed below.
The plant height (cm) of chrysanthemum was significantly influenced by different levels of phenophase based irrigation and fertigation. Among interactions effects the maximum plant height (61.19 cm) was recorded in and I.F. (63.68 cm) whereas, the minimum (44.60 cm) was recorded in I.F. during the second year. In pooled interaction, the maximum plant height (62.44 cm) was recorded in I.F. and it was on par with the treatment I2F4 (61.81 cm) and the minimum (46.91 cm) was recorded in I1F2. (Table 1 & 2) (Fig.1).
The irrigation treatment I.- (0.8 ER each at vegetative, bud and flowering phases) in combination with F. fertigation at 40:20:20 % NPK (vegetative phase), 30:40:40 % NPK (bud phase) 30:40:40% NPK (flowering phase) @ 75:112.5:75 kg NPK/ha2 recorded the maximum plant height (62.44 cm) in chrysanthemum var. Marigold. The increase in plant height with irrigation at I. might be due to adequate moisture provided in the soil throughout the crop period. Adequate soil moisture resulted in greater development of meristematic tissues leading to higher rate of photosynthesis and assimilation in the plant system in marigold (Chawla, 2008).
In the fertigation treatment F., higher proportion of nitrogen fertilizer at vegetative phase might have increased the plant height because of the synergistic interaction of nitrogen with available endogenous auxin resulting in enhanced cell wall plasticity and increased cell elongation thus resulting in increase in the height of the plant. Further, during the bud and flowering phases, the sustained growth of the plant might have been the result of optimum application of nitrogen. The results from the present investigation could hence be attributed to the frequent and constant application of optimum levels of fertilizers at appropriate intervals at crop phenophases, which increases the available nutrient status in the root rhizosphere at constant levels during all the phases thus increasing the uptake of nutrients rapidly, and further influencing the growth of the plant. Similar observations were earlier reported by Mamata et al. (2017) in marigold, Parya et al. (2017) in gerbera, Priyanka et al. (2017) in gladiolus and Satapathy et al. (2016) in marigold, Jamil et al. (2016), Zawadzisnka and Janicka (2007) in amaryllis and viola respectively.
The treatment I1F4 was on par with I3F4 for maximum (10.83), number of primary branches per plant (Table 1 & 3) and the maximum number of secondary branches per plant (42.65) was recorded in the treatment combination I3F4 and it was on par with I1F4 (41.44) and the minimum (17.75) was recorded in I.F..
The treatment I.F. recorded the maximum number of secondary branches per plant (42.65) in chrysanthemum var. Marigold. This increase in number branches might be mainly due to the increased irrigation scheduled favoring longer availability of soil moisture which leads to better growth and development of vegetative part of the plant.
The greater availability of nutrient at optimum proportions at critical growth stages in the present fertigation treatment might have resulted in production of more number of branches per plant as observed by Siraj Ali (1998) in bird-of- paradise. Polara et al. (2015) recorded similar results in African marigold. These findings are in conformation with the earlier results of Jawaharlal and Ganesh (2020) in chrysanthemum and Nagaraju et al. (2003) in rose (Table 4 & 5).
The average plant spread was significantly influenced and showed linear increase with irrigation regime and with optimum dosage of water-soluble fertilizers through fertigation. Among interactions effect the maximum average plant spread (53.23 cm) was recorded in the treatment combination I.F. followed by the treatment I.F. (45.76 cm) and the minimum (31.60 cm) was recorded in the treatment combination of I.F. during the first year. The maximum average plant spread (49.33 cm) was recorded in the treatment combination I3F1 followed by I2F3 (44.87 cm) and the minimum (30.80 cm) was recorded in the treatment combination I.F. during the second year. In pooled interaction, the maximum average plant spread (47.98 cm) was recorded in the treatment combination I.F. followed by the treatment I.F. (43.61 cm) and the minimum (32.23 cm) was recorded in the treatment combination of I3F2 (Table 4 & 6).
It was recorded that irrigation regime I.- (0.8, 1.0 and 1.2 ER at vegetative, bud and flowering phases, respectively) in combination with fertigation at 40:20:20 % NPK (vegetative phase), 30:40:40 % NPK (bud phase) 30:40:40% NPK (flowering phase) @ 75:112.5:75 kg NPK/ha registered maximum average plant spread (47.98 cm). This result clearly showed that higher amount of nitrogen supplied at vegetative phase along with higher soil moisture levels leads to increased vegetative growth of chrysanthemum var. Marigold. According to Paul et al. (1996) the plant spread could be attributed to the frequent application of fertilizers with constant supply of nutrients, at regular intervals for better growth which would have resulted in reduced nutrient losses by leaching and efficient use of nutrients through fertigation compared to soil application. This is in accordance with the findings of Deshmukh and Wavhal (1998) in china aster and Ahirwal et al. (2012) in African marigold.
The maximum number of leaves (235.03) was recorded in the treatment combination I.F. and it was
on par with I.F. (229.61) and the minimum number of leaves per plant (205.01) were recorded in I.F. during the first year. The maximum number of leaves per plant (215.50) was recorded in the treatment combination I3F1 and it was on par with I2F2 (192.21), I1F3 (171.61) and I3F4 (175.90) whereas, the minimum (89.61) was recorded in I1F2 during the second year. In pooled interaction the maximum number of leaves per plant (217.76) were recorded in the treatment combination I3F1 and it was on par with I2F2 (208.41), I1F3 (195.96), I1F4 (197.22) and I3F4 (198.75) whereas, the minimum (154.61) was recorded in I1F2 (Table 4 & 7).
The treatment I3F4 registered maximum number of leaves per plant and maximum leaf area (2404.74 cm2) was recorded in I1F4 and it was on par with I3F4 (2352.18 cm2) and the lowest (1308.31 cm2) was recorded in I3F1 during the vegetative phase (Tables 8 & 9) (Fig. 2a, 2b & 2c). In the present study, the increase in number of leaves and leaf area could be
attributed to Application of higher proportion of nitrogen fertilizer and optimum irrigation regimes at vegetative phase might have increased the number of leaves and leaf area. It may be due to the fact that the vegetative growth increased with nitrogen application and hence nitrogen is an essential part of nucleic acid, which plays a vital role in promoting vegetative growth. The present results were also in line with the reports of Maharnor et al. (2011) and Polara et al. (2014) in African marigold, Karam et al. (2007) in sunflower and Jaleel et al. (2009) in Catharanthus. Rawat and Mathpal (1984), Paul et al. (1996) and Khan et al. (1996) in various crops.
In the vegetative phase of chrysanthemum var. Marigold, the irrigation treatment I.-(0.8 ER each at vegetative, bud and flowering phases) in combination with fertigation treatment F. at 40:20:20 % NPK (vegetative phase), 30:40:40 % NPK (bud phase) 30:40:40% NPK (flowering phase) @ 75:112.5:75 kg NPK/ha was found adequate to cater the demand of water as well as nutrient requirement for vegetative phase of chrysanthemum var. Marigold. This can be correlated with the maximum loose flower yield (26.27 t/ha) registered by the same treatment. Further better plant growth as recorded during the investigation is indicative of better uptake of nutrients which in turn are involved in basic reaction of photosynthesis and in synthesis of metabolites required for plant growth with above irrigation and fertigation schedule. Hence it is concluded that the above treatment combination I.F. was registered as the best treatment to improve the vegetative growth of chrysanthemum var. Marigold.