Abstract: This article is aimed at observing the acquisition and assessment of a list of forty phrasal verbs in a group of first-year students of the course LM-1001 Integrated English I at the University of Costa Rica. First of all, the author implements a placement test to determine the students’ proficiency level, being Integrated English I the first EFL course of the program. Then, the author administers two instruments to assess the students’ knowledge on a series of phrasal verbs before the presentation, practice, and production throughout the second part of the semester. A contextualized sample lesson to practice a selection of phrasal verbs is also included. To finish, the students receive two additional instruments and a final evaluative instrument to observe the level of acquisition of twenty phrasal verbs as a result of explicit instruction.
Palabras claves: verbos frasalesverbos frasales,enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjeraenseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera,la enseñanza de la gramáticala enseñanza de la gramática,desarrollo de materialesdesarrollo de materiales,plan de lecciónplan de lección.
Resumen: Este artículo pretende observar la adquisición y evaluación de una lista de cuarenta verbos frasales en un grupo de estudiantes de primer año del curso LM-1001 Inglés Integrado I en la Universidad de Costa Rica. Primero, el autor aplica un examen de ubicación para determinar el nivel de los estudiantes, siendo el primer curso de la Carrera de Inglés. Posteriormente, el autor aplica dos instrumentos para evaluar el conocimiento de una serie de verbos frasales antes de la presentación, práctica, y producción a lo largo de la segunda parte del semestre. Se incluye una lección para practicar una selección de verbos frasales en contexto. Por último, los estudiantes reciben un último instrumento evaluativo para observar el nivel de adquisición de únicamente veinte verbos frasales como resultado de la instrucción explícita.
Palabras claves: verbos frasales, enseñanza del inglés como lengua extranjera, la enseñanza de la gramática, desarrollo de materiales, plan de lección.
Keywords: phrasal verbs, teaching English as a foreign language, materials development, vocabulary, lesson planning
Artículo
The acquisition of a series of phrasal verbs in the course integrated English I at the University of Costa Rica
La adquisición de una serie de verbos frasales en el curso Inglés integrado I en la Universidad de Costa Rica
Recepción: 07 Febrero 2016
Aprobación: 09 Febrero 2018
At novice or intermediate levels, it is not easy for EFL learners to completely assimilate and acquire certain intricacies of grammar. Sometimes, L2 students cannot distinguish a clear cut correlation between in-class presentation and practice with out-of-class use and production in real-life contexts. In fact, in relation to some of the main differences between L1 and L2 acquisition, White (1995) explains that the “degree of success in acquiring pronunciation and morphology, learners’ mother tongue, age, fossilization of errors, and the type of input received” may highlight the challenges of the teaching-learning process and the assimilation of phonology and universal grammar (p.41). Similarly, “L1 acquisition always takes place with naturalistic input, in contrast to L2 acquisition, where the input can vary considerably depending on the learning environment and teaching method” (White, 1995, p.44). As a result, language instructors should always provide learners with meaningful input to help them successfully assimilate troublesome grammar content such as the form, meaning, and use of phrasal verbs.
The teaching and learning of phrasal verbs is quite challenging among novice and low-intermediate EFL populations. For this reason, the main objective of this study is to specifically observe a group of EFL learners’ acquisition of a series of forty phrasal verbs as a result of explicit instruction. The selection of phrasal verbs attempts to complement those presented in the course textbook and the grammar booklet. This study also presents a sample lesson to teach such content in a first-year English course. This lesson was implemented with a group of students who enrolled the course LM-1001 Integrated English I at the University of Costa Rica. Given the fact that this course lacks a placement instrument that determines the learners’ proficiency level before registering this course, the author administered a grammar test to identify their level in this area during the first class session.
To some extent, phrasal verbs may be confusing and challenging for students due to their form, meaning, and use. To define what phrasal verbs are, McCarthy and O’Dell (2007, p.6) explain that they “consist of a verb and a particle (a preposition or adverb) or a verb and two particles (an adverb and a preposition, as in get on with or look forward to).” A preposition and an adverb may be called particles. When the particle follows a verb and, as a result, shares the given meaning of the verb, this is referred to as an inseparable phrasal verb. These verbs cannot be separated as different particles change meanings. In other words, “the meaning of the two words together is different from the meanings of the verbs and the preposition by themselves. These verb + particle combinations have an idiomatic meaning” (Baker et al, 2003, p.99). Some other phrasal verbs may allow a word (nouns or pronouns) between the verb and the particle. The following table summarizes this construction:

Although phrasal verbs are seem merely as grammar content to be memorized in overwhelming lists, experts argue that they should be presented as lexical units. In relation to this, McCarthy and O’Dell (2007) point out that phrasal verbs “are identified by their grammar, but it is probably best to think of them as individual vocabulary items, to be learnt in phrases or chunks. They often-but not always-have a one-word equivalent” (p.6). Accordingly, the complexity of teaching phrasal verbs relies on the fact that learners must focus on their meaning, form, and use, being their meaning one of the most significant challenges. Hasbún (2005) explains that “learners need to keep in mind that these multi-word units are necessary if natural communication is to happen. For example, in order to acquire phrasal verbs, students need to understand their form, their meaning and their use” (p.2). Additionally, in terms of the lexical aspect of phrasal verbs, Hart (2009) clarifies that
Some phrasal verbs are very easy to understand. For example, it is not difficult to understand sit down or come in because their meanings are obvious. But many phrasal verbs are very idiomatic. Idiomatic means that there is no way to know what the verb and particle mean together by knowing what the verb and the particle mean separately. For example, every beginning-level student learns what the words call, run, off, and out mean, but that does not help the student to know that call off means cancel or that run out means use all of something (p.vi).
An example of this occurs with the verb put, and these are some of its different meanings listed by the International Dictionary of Phrasal Verbs (1997, p.226-232):
Put about: to spread inaccurate information
Put across: to explain something as clearly as possible
Put aside: to save money, to ignore a problem, or to store something
Put at: to make rough calculations in terms of size or amounts
Put away: to place something in a different place
Put back: to change the location of something
Put before: to give more attention to something over another element
Put behind: to try to forget and overcome tough experiences
Put by: to save money for later use
Put down: to ridicule or criticize somebody else; to pay part of a debt; to kill; to write something down; to land in a plane
Put forth: to give an opinion formally
Put forward: to suggest a plan for later evaluation and implementation
Put in: to express a request
Put off: to postpone an activity or action
Put on: to put something onto the skin or body
Put out: to make something stop, to make a boat sail, among other meanings
Put together: to join the different components of a whole
Put up: to build a structure, to oppose something, among other meanings
The difficulty of using phrasal verbs appropriately has various explanations. Folse (2004) lists them as she says that non-native speakers regularly struggle with the understanding of phrasal verbs:
Because phrasal verbs have a high level of occurrence in English, learners must get acquainted with some of them in order comprehend input and, as a result, interact. “English learners must know the meaning of the more frequent ones even in the simplest of exchanges.”
“Knowing the parts of the phrasal verb does not equal knowing the whole phrasal verb.” Thus, EFL learners with limited vocabulary will fail at trying to translate or interpret meaning.
The third difficulty has to do with phonetics because native speakers tend to reduce the particles or prepositions as they speak.
Finally, regarding separable phrasal verbs, students might get confused in real-life conversations with native speakers by the number of words between the verb and the particle or preposition since “English actually allows the particle to “float” much more than three words away” (p. 5-7).
Lessard-Clouston (1993) goes beyond and lists further reasons that explain why ESL learners encounter some difficulty when acquiring phrasal verbs. He points out that (1) the meaning of a phrasal verb is confusing although students identify the meaning of its parts; (2) various meanings can be associated with a verb and a variety of prepositions and particles; (3) “each verb + preposition/particle combination may have several different meanings;” (4) phrasal verbs may be transitive, intransitive, or both according to their context; (5) phrasal verbs may be separable and non-separable; (6) some phrasal verbs may be ambiguous; (7) getting the closest meaning of a phrasal verb is somewhat difficult unless learners consult a good dictionary; (8) “there are differences in use among different varieties of English;” and finally, “perhaps one of the most difficult aspects of phrasal verb from, meaning, and use is that there are often distinctions between similar two- and three-word verbs” (Lessard-Clouston, 1993, p. 6-7). These factors, therefore, make the assimilation and acquisition of phrasal verbs a difficult task, especially at lower levels.
As phrasal verbs represent a challenging factor for novice and low-intermediate learners, an avoidance strategy tends to occur. For example, in a research study with English major students and non-English majors, Chen (2007) observed that those Chinese college students seemed to substitute phrasal verbs with one-word vocabulary. Among various social and educational factors as well as some weaknesses related to curriculum design and teaching resources, Chen (2007, p.349) emphasizes that “the lack of a long existing foreign language environment is likely to be the most important factor to cause the problem of the avoidance of English language phrasal verbs by Chinese learners.”
Since the mere memorization and assimilation of phrasal verbs may become tedious and daunting for some ESL learners, how should phrasal verbs be taught? They should always be presented in context rather than in overwhelming lists in which the instructor mistakenly focuses on several verbs in isolation. Phrasal verbs should be presented in contextualized themed groups (e.g., advertising, computing, or traveling) with the implementation of authentic materials. By using authentic sources, students will be more motivated to scan and analyze the meaning, form, and use of phrasal verbs in real-life contexts (newspaper advertisements, recipes, instructional manuals, or even songs). Gairns and Redman (1986, cited in Marks, 2006) has listed four key recommendations in relation to the teaching of phrasal verbs in context:
Instructors should focus on the verb; however, it is imperative to note that this “focus-on-the-verb approach can be used to provide data for learners to look for common features of meaning in groups of phrasal verbs” (p.2). In other words, students see how the various particles for a common verb may share a similar action or activity.
Instructors should focus on the participle when it has the same meaning accompanied by different verbs.
Instructors should see a contextual linking among phrasal verbs.
Instructors should also present the different meanings of the same verb and particle in various contexts; thus, learners reflect on the meaning of “to take off clothes, to take off a person, or to take off £5” (p.3).
To what extent does formal and explicit instruction help a group of EFL learners successfully assimilate and use the meaning and form of a series of forty phrasal verbs?
Does this assimilation tend to increase or decline throughout the second part of the semester with this particular population?
1.2 The specific objectives are this small-scale research study are:
Identify the proficiency level of this group of EFL learners who took the course LM-1001 Integrated English I.
Explain the definition and intricacies of the teaching of phrasal verbs.
Assess the learners’ knowledge on two series of phrasal verbs before its presentation, practice, and production.
Present a series of activities and/or sample tasks related to the presentation, practice, and production of some phrasal verbs.
Administer the learners’ acquisition of phrasal verbs with two alternative instruments and a final evaluative instrument, being this a grammar quiz.
Observe the improvement reached by the group of LM-1001 learners after the explicit and formal instruction of a series of phrasal verbs.
Highlight some recommendations in relation to the teaching of phrasal verbs.
The Target Population and its Characteristics
Originally, the target group consisted of 25 first-year English majors at the School of Modern Languages at the University of Costa Rica. In this case, 17 students took the course for their first time and 6 had failed it during the previous semesters. Also, 6 students combined their English studies with a second major at UCR; in addition, 5 students took the English Teaching program and the rest pursued the B.A. in English. LM-1001 Integrated English I is a course that lacks a placement test to determine students’ level of proficiency; for this reason, a diagnostic instrument was implemented on the first day.
This instrument focused on six grammatical aspects: subject verb agreement, the use of there is / there are, question formation, present perfect, the comparative and superlative forms, and phrasal verbs. The test assessed grammar content due to the nature of this study. Thus, the grammar placement test revealed that the level of proficiency of this group was relatively diverse.

The table shows that the target population is composed by a group of 16 low novice students based on the ACTFL rubric (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages). Overall, 22 LM-1001 learners are beginners and 2 are classified as having a low intermediate level. These levels correlate with the level of the course book. Finally, there was high intermediate student in the group who did not decide to take the proficiency exam and took the course on a regular basis. There were not any advanced learners.
This LM-1001 target population used the new series of textbooks entitled Q: Skills for Success which is divided into two books according to the language macro-skills: listening/speaking (Brooks, 2011) and reading/writing (Bixby and McVeigh, 2011). Also, students are required to use an additional grammar booklet that reinforces the content of the course syllabus. Since time is an important constrain in such a course, only eight chapters are covered (Units 1-4 and 5, 7-9). This is the grammar content included in the listening/speaking textbook Q: Skills for Success: present continuous verbs (Unit 1), the use of There’s and It’s (Unit 2), modal verbs should and shouldn’t and questions with modals (Unit 3), imperative verbs (Unit 4), auxiliary verbs in questions (Unit 5), future with will (Unit 7), simple past and narrative present (Unit 8), and modals of possibility could and might (Unit 9). On the other hand, the reading/writing book covers the following grammar topics: simple present and present continuous (Unit 1), conjunctions (Unit 2), subject-verb agreement (Unit 3), modals should and ought to (Unit 4), the comparative and superlative form (Unit 5), future time clauses (Unit 7), simple past and past progressive (Unit 8), and present perfect (Unit 9.)
In terms of the study of phrasal verbs, this topic is covered extensively in chapter 7 of the grammar booklet, which contains a complete section on this area. In addition, the reading/writing textbook (Bixby and McVeigh, 2011) includes an introductory chart as well as further practice (p.135-136). Students learn about the definition of phrasal verbs as well as the meaning, form, and use of separable and non-separable phrasal verbs. Thus, during the second part of the course, students are also given complete lists to exemplify and expand on this aspect. They also learn to choose and conjugate verbs accordingly. It is worth noting that since LM-1001 Integrated English I is a team taught course, the author of this study was in charge of presenting, informally assess, and evaluate all the content related with phrasal verbs. This took place during the second half of the course and covered all the teaching-learning stages: presentation, practice, production, feedback, alternative or informal assessment, and formal evaluation (short tests and a final grammar exam).
As mentioned before, the different instruments were implemented at various stages during the second part of the semester when the target content was presented. The instruments consisted of four non-evaluative charts to determine the learners’ knowledge and accuracy on two lists of phrasal verbs (each series contains 20 verbs). An instrument was given before presenting its phrasal verbs formally during the subsequent sessions. Once students systematically acquired this content, the last two charts were administered afterwards to observe acquisition. Also, additional contextualized sample lessons were implemented to present and reinforce this area apart from the exercises included in the course textbooks.
Another instrument consisted of an evaluative quiz to formally measure how much students know about a selected list of 20 separable and non-separable phrasal verbs. These verbs were taken from the previous instruments due to their level of difficulty for most learners. Finally, as an additional component, the author includes the results of the exercises presented in the final grammar test as a way to see students’ level of accuracy. To sum up, the following chart lists the forty target phrasal verbs that students were supposed to acquire through the second part of the course:

Table 4 compiles the students’ previous knowledge on a series of 20 non-separable phrasal verbs. For each correct use of a given verb in a sentence or definition, the author used check marks (() and an “X” is used for mistakes.

In this case, students were given an instrument (see Appendix A) in which they had to either write a contextualized sentence to show that they know the exact meaning of the target phrasal verb or they were asked to write a precise definition. At this moment, only separable verbs were assessed. Regarding the sentences, although additional grammar mistakes were also corrected, the instructor was interested in the students’ appropriate recognition of meaning when defining the verbs as well as their appropriate form and use at the moment of writing meaningful sentences. In the chart, each number on top of the lists corresponds with each student. It is imperative to clarify that only 18 LM-1001 completed all the five instruments ; for this reason, there is a notorious difference in number, being this a group with 25 students originally.
The level of accuracy was determined with a passing grade of 7.0 or above and a failing grade of 6.5 or below. A color code is used to easily differentiate both passing and failing numbers. To some extent, writing a short definition was somewhat easier than producing original sentences. The first results in Table 4 indicate that the overall accuracy level is 6.80 based on the general list of 20 verbs. Some students seem to over generalize the meaning of verbs such as work out and came up with a wrong definition or sentence; this verb had the lowest level of precision (2.22%). Thus, the right column includes the percentage of accuracy for each verb that all the students reached. From the perspective of each LM-1001 student, the table shows that only 8 students out of 18 obtained a passing grade in this instrument; the lowest grade is 4.0.
After a few class sessions, students worked with class material and sample lessons on phrasal verbs, their meaning, form, and use. Later, they were given a second instrument (see Appendix B) that assessed the same phrasal verbs in a way that learners would not notice that those verbs were informally evaluated beforehand. It is important to say that students get familiar with several verbs besides the ones spotted in these instruments. So, the instructor did not focus exclusively on the target ones during the class sessions. The results are summarized in the next chart. From the perspective of verbs, Table 5 indicates that 18 verbs were used correctly by most students on the scale of the passing grade.

After the target population has received formal instruction on separable phrasal verbs, the accuracy level of acquisition seemed to increase in subsequent lessons. The target separable phrasal verbs in this second instrument show an accuracy level of 9.0. The troublesome verbs in this case were break up and hang in. Furthermore, from the perspective of each student, the accuracy level increased substantially and reached a grade of 9.4, but only one student failed at obtaining a passing grade and got a 4.0 in this instrument. Overall, the level is 8.58 after students received formal instruction.
The next two charts summarize the data obtained regarding the learners’ acquisition rate of non-separable verbs including a couple of prepositional verbs as well. Once again, students received a chart (see Appendix C) to write either meaningful sentences based on a definition or, on the other hand, come up with an exact definition based on the content of a sentence. Interestingly, while carrying out this task, a few learners indicated that this was a more challenging task since most verbs were new or confusing. Also, there were lots of grammar mistakes and syntactic errors in learners’ original sentences. Table 6 shows that the overall accuracy level is only 6.06 in terms of the list of verbs. Additionally, 10 out of 18 students did not obtain a passing grade. Students were not able to figure out the meaning of look forward to in this instrument, and the troublesome verbs in this instrument were get away with, look up to, fall apart, live on, run into, show off, and take off. Thus, prepositional phrasal verbs give an additional level of difficulty to most students. On the other hand, from the point of view of these 18 students, the average of accuracy level is 6.0.
After a few class sessions, students were received the fourth instrument (see Appendix D) to assess the acquisition level of non-separable phrasal verbs. There was an evident improvement in this area as the complete list of verbs shows an increase from 6.0 to 7.69 (see Table 7). Interestingly, for some learners it was tough to use certain phrasal verbs in complete sentences (e.g., give in, show off, take off, and get rid off), but they successfully use or define hang out, run away, stop by, and watch over. As a group, the accuracy level is 7.72, and only 5 learners failed this instrument and got a failing grade.


Once the target group carried out all the sample lessons and exercises regarding this topic, the author administered a quiz (see Appendix E) to evaluate 10 separable and 10 non-separable verbs. These verbs were chosen from the first instruments, but obviously learners were asked to study all the content seen during the second part of the semester regarding phrasal verbs, their meaning and use. The reason why these verbs were specifically chosen relies on the fact that they were the most problematic for students during this part of the course at the moment of carrying out the assessment instruments. The chart below includes the target verbs to be formally evaluated:

In relation to the components of this quiz, students carried out four different types of exercises. First, they were asked to rewrite the content of sentences in a way that the underlined part includes the correct phrasal verb taken from a word bank. Secondly, they read a set of five questions; then, they had to circle the answer that correctly matches the meaning of the phrasal verb in each sentence. In the case of the third exercise, they had to complete a set of sentences with the phrasal verbs from a word bank. Finally, the fourth exercise included five phrasal verbs so that students create their own original and contextualized sentences to show they knew their meaning. Table 9 shows the final results obtained by the 18 students.

The results of the quiz were evident. In fact, from the perspective of the list of verbs, 18 verbs out of 20 were used correctly as they appear in Table 9. The only two verbs that show a failing grade were pull through and run into; however, a few students struggled with three phrasal verbs: give up, get away with, and watch over. On the contrary, from the point of view of the students, only one student obtained a failing grade (5.0). The accuracy percentage of the rest of the group is 87,94 regarding this short test.
In the course LM-1001 Integrated English I, there are two grammar exams. The second test included an exercise to evaluate phrasal verbs. The chart below (Table 10) shows that the five target verbs reached an accuracy level (from the perspective of the 18 students) of 81.11, and only one student did not use any of the verbs correctly. Once again, there is an evident improvement due to extensive instruction.

The following sample lesson complements the seventh lesson of the course units. One of the main objectives of this material is to present and teach some phrasal verbs in context by using samples of authentic language. The authentic materials consisted of magazine advertisements and newspaper headlines. Sample activities 1 and 2 attempt to help learners get acquainted with the meaning of phrasal verbs in their context. Sample activity 3 is based on authentic language as learners read a series of magazine covers and underline all the phrasal verbs; then, they come up with a short definition for each verb. The following activity takes place at the computer lab as students look for sample covers that contain at least one phrasal verb. Also, they must define each verb and write an original sentence using the same phrasal verb in context. At the lab, learners use the multimedia projector or smart board to present their sentences.
To establish cooperative learning, group work is also part of the teaching/learning process. To achieve this, students get in small groups and create their own magazine covers in which phrasal verbs are incorporated to complete sample activity 5. Once again, they do this at the computer lab to facilitate the designing process. Also, students may choose a topic they find interesting or appealing such as sports, nutrition, computer equipment, home improvement, video games, health, gardening, and the like. The second part of the lesson is also conducted at the computer lab. Students are given a set of authentic newspaper headlines (sample activity 6) so that they define the phrasal verbs in boldface. In relation to sample activity 7, students surf the Net and look for newspaper headlines that include at least one phrasal verb; they need to define the verb as well. Then, they are asked to read the content of the article to present its main ideas orally in front of the class. Because this is time consuming, this part of the lesson may be divided into two sessions. Finally, sample activity 8 is a follow-up speaking task in which learners work in pairs and take turns to ask a series of questions. In this case, they must use the given phrasal verbs in their answers orally.
Sample Lesson: Magazine Advertisements and Newspaper Headlines
Sample Activity 1. Pair work. Read the sentences below; underline the phrasal verb they contain. Then, match each sentence with the correct definition of each phrasal verb.
Prepare or get ready
Load or stack with something
Please or surprise to a high level
Supply better components to a machine
Make something function faster and more efficiently
Stop hoping that something will achieve what you expect
Sample Activity 2. Individual work. Some people are scanning magazine ads because they want to find the best products for their needs. Which phrases would fit each potential customer’s situation? Fill in the blanks with the correct verb. There is an extra one.
get ahead with carry on give up carry out slim down
Sample Activity 3. Scanning ads. Read the following pieces of advertisements and underline the phrasal verb. Then, in pairs, write a short definition based on the context of the original advertisement. Be read to share your definitions with the rest of the class.



*Adapted from PlayStation Magazine *Adapted from Custom PC Magazine*Adapted from
Eating Well


*Adapted from PC Advisor*Adapted from XBOX Official Magazine


*Adapted from Triathlon Magazine*Adapted from Men’s Health


*Adapted from PC Power Play *Adapted from ESPN Magazine



*Adapted from Chicago Home+Garden *Adapted from Men’s Health *Unknown
source
(*) Images of advertisements adapted and used for educational purposes only
Sample Activity 4. Computer lab session
Surf the Net and look for three magazine covers that contain phrasal verbs. Look for magazines with appealing topics for you (sports, computer equipment, video games, health, and the like). For each phrasal verb, write a short definition according to the context of the topic; then, write an original, contextualized sentence in which you demonstrate that you fully understand the meaning of each verb. Keep in mind that some verbs may be separable or non-separable. Get ready to present this with the multimedia projector.
Sample Activity 5. Group work. Create your own magazine cover or piece of advertisement in which you incorporate phrasal verbs. You may use the verbs studied in class. Be ready to present your design to the rest of the class.
Sample Activity 6. Defining phrasal verbs. Read the following newspaper headlines. Then, using your dictionary, look for the closet meaning of the phrasal verb in each headline. Write the definition next to the headline. Work in pairs.
“Ryan Says He Would Run for Speaker if G.O.P. Unites” (Taken from The New York Times)
“Kevin Merida of Washington Post Will Take Over ESPN Project” (Taken from The New York Times)
“Nazis killed Simon Goodman's grandparents and stole their art; new book tells how he got some of it back” (Taken from Los Angeles Times)
“Costa Rica's Public Security Minister calls for new organized crime unit after spike in killings” (Taken from The Tico Times)
“Brazil pulls out of electoral mission to Venezuela” (Taken from The Washington Post)
“New Joint Chiefs chairman looks over war zone in Iraq” (Taken from The Washington Post)
“5 Foods You’re Spoiling By Putting In the Refrigerator” (Taken from The Reader’s Digest)
Sample Activity 7. Computer lab session
Part A. Surf the Net and look for two newspaper articles that contain phrasal verbs. Look for articles with appealing topics for you. For each phrasal verb, write a short definition according to the context of the topic.
Part B. Get ready to explain the content of one of the newspaper articles to the rest of the class. Fully explain its headline and the meaning of its phrasal verb.
Sample Activity 8. Speaking task. In pairs, discuss the content of the following questions.
STUDENT A
Ask your classmate each question. Try to ask follow-up questions if possible.
STUDENT B
Ask your classmate each question. Try to ask follow-up questions if possible.
Recommendations for EFL instructors and Conclusion
It is useful for novice instructors of LM-1001 Integrated English I to consider the following suggestions when teaching phrasal verbs:
Phrasal verbs should be taught in context with the implementation of authentic materials (e.g., recipes, manuals, newspapers, magazine covers, and the like).These verbs should be contextualized in appealing and interesting topics for young learners (e.g., technology, computing, video games, health, and so on).
An integration of several language skills is a must, especially at the moment of putting phrasal verbs into practice in the oral mode so that the avoidance strategy is minimized. It is a must to reinforce the course materials so that learners go beyond the written exercises found in their books.
Since this type of population is highly heterogeneous, it is important to implement and administer a placement test to determine students’ level of proficiency, especially in the course LM-1001 Integrated English I.
Novice EFL learners should consult a dictionary to become aware of the different meanings of phrasal verbs; in fact, “good dictionary skills for finding and working through the various meanings and uses of the phrasal verbs they [learners] encounter are also important” (Lessard-Clouston, 1993, p.8-9).
To establish learner autonomy regarding the study of phrasal verbs, students may use flashcards as a learning strategy. These “cards are a reliable source for self-study and the students know precisely why each card is in the box and are able to evaluate which word to focus on” (Coxhead, 2006, p.42). By doing so, learners may easily consult the meaning, form, and use of phrasal verbs.
Even though learning phrasal verbs is challenging and difficult for EFL novice and low-intermediate students, the results mentioned in this small-scale study demonstrated the positive effect of constant, explicit and formal instruction on these students’ acquisition of the target phrasal verbs. This occurred although absenteeism was an important drawback in this kind of English course. Again, it is important for instructors to select, design, and prepare appropriate materials and activities (controlled, semi-controlled, and guided exercises) to help learners assimilate this content and become autonomous students in the teaching-learning process. By using authentic and appealing materials to present phrasal verbs in context, learners will certainly benefit from a motivating and meaningful content and engage more actively in class.









