<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model type="application/xml-dtd" href="https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" specific-use="Marcalyc 1.3" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="index">6920</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title specific-use="original" xml:lang="en">Iberoamerican Journal of Medicine</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher" xml:lang="en">Iberoam J Med</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="epub">2695-5075</issn>
<issn-l>2695-5075</issn-l>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Hospital San Pedro</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>
<country>España</country>
<email>eestebanz@riojasalud.es</email>
</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="art-access-id" specific-use="redalyc">692082787003</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.53986/ibjm.2025.0005</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original article</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en">Surgical site infections prevalence among caesarean section patients</article-title>
<trans-title-group>
<trans-title xml:lang="es">Prevalencia de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico entre pacientes de cesárea</trans-title>
</trans-title-group>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Alkout</surname>
<given-names>Tasneem</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Alkout</surname>
<given-names>Abdulhamid M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="corresp" rid="corresp1"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/>
<email>Dr.Alkout@gmail.com</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Rasheed</surname>
<given-names>Esraa</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Etekbali</surname>
<given-names>Osama</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff8"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Abousnina</surname>
<given-names>Fathi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff10"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff11"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Araibi</surname>
<given-names>Alhadi</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff13"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff14"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution content-type="original"> Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> University of Tripoli, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<institution content-type="original"> Albarra Hospital, Ben Ashour street, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> Albarra Hospital, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<institution content-type="original"> Faculty of Medical Technology, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> University of Tripoli, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<institution content-type="original"> Albarra Hospital, Ben Ashour street, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> Albarra Hospital, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff8">
<institution content-type="original"> Albarra Hospital, Ben Ashour street, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> Albarra Hospital, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff10">
<institution content-type="original"> Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> University of Tripoli, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff11">
<institution content-type="original"> Albarra Hospital, Ben Ashour street, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> Albarra Hospital, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff13">
<institution content-type="original"> Faculty of Medicine, University of Tripoli, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> University of Tripoli, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff14">
<institution content-type="original"> Albarra Hospital, Ben Ashour street, Tripoli, Libya </institution>
<country country="LY">Libia</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname"> Albarra Hospital, Tripoli </institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<author-notes>
<corresp id="corresp1">
<email>Dr.Alkout@gmail.com</email>
</corresp>
</author-notes>
<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
<season>Febrero</season>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>7</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>11</fpage>
<lpage>16</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>29</day>
<month>06</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="corrected" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>18</day>
<month>11</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>21</day>
<month>12</month>
<year>2024</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<ali:free_to_read/>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>
<underline>Introduction</underline>: Cesarean section is one of the most prevalent surgical procedures in the world and Surgical Site Infections (SSI) are the most common complication following Cesarean section.  This leads to greater patient dissatisfaction, longer hospital stays, and higher treatment costs. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the prevalence of wound infection and the prevalence of bacterial isolates in post-Cesarean section and its sensitivity to variant antibiotics.</p>
<p>
<underline>Material and methods</underline>: Samples were collected from patients who had developed wound infection following cesarean section and cultured on blood, chocolate and chromatic agar. The isolated bacteria was identified by ordinary microbiology techniques.</p>
<p>
<underline>Results</underline>: Among 4,482 Cesarean section patients in Albaraa Hospital, the surgical site infections (SSI) rate was 2.94 %. Microorganisms isolated from these cases included <italic>Candida albicans</italic> at a rate of 0.11%. The remaining 2.83% were bacterial isolates, with 70.1% being gram-positive bacteria significantly higher than the 29.9% attributed to gram-negative bacteria (P = 0.01). The main bacteria isolates were <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (37.8%), <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> (23.6%), <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> (11.4%), <italic>Klebsiella pneumonia</italic> (8.3%), <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (5.3%) and <italic>Alpha hemolytic Streptococcus</italic> (3.8%)</p>
<p>
<underline>Conclusions</underline>: The SSI rate in this study was at the lower limit of the WHO predicted infection rate and the bacterial isolates were sensitive to many antibiotics.  This result may be due to the pre, intra and postoperative prophylactic antibiotics administered to patients and other factors such as short hospital stay and staff training in aseptic techniques. This study recommends further assessment of SSI in alternative surgical procedures, and assess the efficiency of prophylactic antibiotics in alternative surgeries in Libya. </p>
</abstract>
<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
<title>Resumen</title>
<p>
<underline>Introducción</underline>: La cesárea es uno de los procedimientos quirúrgicos más frecuentes en el mundo y las infecciones del sitio quirúrgico (ISQ) son la complicación más común después de una cesárea. Esto conduce a una mayor insatisfacción de las pacientes, estancias hospitalarias más prolongadas y mayores costos de tratamiento. El objetivo de este estudio retrospectivo es determinar la prevalencia de la infección de la herida y la prevalencia de aislamientos bacterianos en el post-cesárea y su sensibilidad a los antibióticos variantes.</p>
<p>
<underline>Material y métodos</underline>: Se recogieron muestras de pacientes que habían desarrollado una infección de la herida después de una cesárea y se cultivaron en agar sangre, chocolate y cromático. Las bacterias aisladas se identificaron mediante técnicas de microbiología ordinarias.</p>
<p>
<underline>Resultados</underline>: Entre 4.482 pacientes de cesárea en el Hospital Albaraa, la tasa de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico (ISQ) fue del 2,94%. Los microorganismos aislados de estos casos incluyeron <italic>Candida albicans</italic> a una tasa del 0,11%. El 2,83% restante fueron aislamientos bacterianos, de los cuales el 70,1 % fueron bacterias grampositivas, significativamente más altas que el 29,9% atribuido a bacterias gramnegativas (P = 0,01). Los principales aislamientos bacterianos fueron <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (37,8%), <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> (23,6%), <italic>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> (11,4%), <italic>Klebsiella pneumoniae</italic> (8,3%), <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (5,3%) y <italic>Streptococcus alfa hemolítico</italic> (3,8%)</p>
<p>
<underline>Conclusiones</underline>: La tasa de SSI en este estudio estuvo en el límite inferior de la tasa de infección predicha por la OMS y los aislamientos bacterianos fueron sensibles a muchos antibióticos. Este resultado puede deberse a los antibióticos profilácticos pre, intra y posoperatorios administrados a los pacientes y a otros factores como la corta estancia hospitalaria y la formación del personal en técnicas asépticas. Este estudio recomienda una evaluación adicional de la SSI en procedimientos quirúrgicos alternativos y evaluar la eficacia de los antibióticos profilácticos en cirugías alternativas en Libia. </p>
</trans-abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Surgical site infections</kwd>
<kwd>Caesarean section </kwd>
<kwd>Antibiotic resistance</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
<title>Palabras clave</title>
<kwd>Infecciones de sitio quirúrgico </kwd>
<kwd>Cesárea</kwd>
<kwd>Resistencia antibióticos </kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="0"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="31"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>redalyc-journal-id</meta-name>
<meta-value>6920</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec>
<title>
<bold> INTRODUCTION </bold>
</title>
<p>Cesarean section is one of the most common surgical procedures performed worldwide and surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common complications [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref1">1</xref>]. SSI is defined by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) criteria as an infection that occurs within 30 days after a surgical procedure. The incident rate is estimated between 3-15%, leading to increased costs, higher rates of patient dissatisfaction, increase length of hospital stay and high mortality and morbidity rates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref2">2</xref>]. Microorganisms can infect surgical wounds through contaminated caregivers or surgical instruments, airborne pathogens, or microorganisms already present on the patient's body [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref3">3</xref>]. The most common pathogens causing SSI after Cesarean section are <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic>, <italic>Escherichia coli</italic>, <italic>Proteus mirabilis</italic>, <italic>Ureaplasma urealyticum</italic>, <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic>, <italic>Enterococcus facialis</italic>, and groups A or <italic>Beta-Hemolytic Streptococcus</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref5">5</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref6">6</xref>]. Epidemiological and clinical studies suggest that there is an increase in C-section rates with an expected increase in SSI rates. Therefore, developing strategies to diagnose, treat and prevent infection will be essential to reduce post-cesarean morbidity and mortality [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref2">2</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref7">7</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref8">8</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref9">9</xref>].</p>
<p>The SSI following Cesarean section delivery is 5-20 times increased compared to vaginal delivery due to various reasons. Firstly host-related factors such as maternal age, obesity, residence, gestational diabetes mellitus, previous Cesarean delivery, recurrent pregnancy loss, and maternal preoperative condition.  Secondly intrapartum-related factors such as hypertensive disorder, gestational diabetes mellitus, twin pregnancy, preterm rupture of membrane and finally the procedure-related factors which is depending on a greater number of vaginal examinations, prolonged trial of labor prior to surgery, epidural use, use of internal fetal monitoring, and lack or improper use of antibiotic pro­phylaxis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref10">10</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref11">11</xref>]. It is important to understand the prevention guidelines of surgical site infection, which includes preoperative prevention such as preoperative showering, nasal decolonization, and no hair removal 7 days prior to surgery, staff theatre wear and preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref12">12</xref>]. Intra-operative prevention such as hand decontamination, sterile gowns, antiseptic skin preparation, wound closure method and wound dressing, prophylactic antibiotics are advised to be given before skin incision. In addition, postoperative prevention as changing dressings, postoperative wound cleansing and care and Cesarean section SSI surveillance, when surgical site infection is suspected give antibiotic that covers the most likely causative organisms, consider local resistance patterns [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref12">12</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref13">13</xref>]. Antibiotic resistance is rising globally, which poses a significant threat and diminishes the efficacy of common antibiotics against widespread bacterial infections. This makes it difficult or impossible to treat, leading to an increase in the risk of disease spread, severe illness, disability and death. The emergence and spread of drug-resistant pathogens threaten our ability to perform life-saving procedures, including Cesarean section and other surgeries [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref14">14</xref>]. The aim of this retrospective study is to determine the prevalence of SSI and the prevalence of bacteria isolated in post- Cesarean section and its resistance to variant antibiotics.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>
<bold> MATERIAL AND METHODS </bold>
</title>
<p>This study was conducted at Albaraa Hospital from 2018 to 2023, all wound swab included in this study were collected from all patients who had developed wound infection following Cesarean section within one month after discharge from hospital. 194 wound swab samples were collected aseptically to avoid contamination of the specimens with normal microbial flora of the skin. The collected swabs were inoculated by using the streaking technique to expose bacteria in a good growing medium of blood agar, chocolate agar and chromatic agar medium and incubated aerobically and anaerobically at 37 C° for 24 hours.  The isolated bacteria were identified by ordinary microbiological techniques.</p>
<p>The Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion method was used in the Antibiotic Sensitivity test of the identified bacterial isolates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref15">15</xref>]. Antibiotics are used depending on the antibiotic policy of the hospital (Recommended Antimicrobial Disks and Interpretative Zone Sizes in Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref15">15</xref>]. After 18–24 hours of incubation, the diameter of the inhibitory zone was measured using a millimeter scale. The zone size around each antimicrobial disc was interpreted as sensitive, intermediate or resistant, according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) criteria.</p>
<p>The paired T-test from SPSS software was used for data analysis and comparing between groups and P value &lt; 0.05 is considered significant.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>
<bold> RESULTS </bold>
</title>
<p>The number of Cesarean section referred to Albaraa Hospital from 2018 to 2023 were 4,482 C-section patients.  Among them, 194 (4.33 %) wound swabs were sent to the lab for culture and sensitivity. The results showed 62 (31.9%) swabs had no growth of microorganisms and 132 (68.1%) swabs had pathogenic microorganisms. There were 5 <italic>Candida albicans</italic> (0.11%) and 127 bacterial isolates (2.83%), among the total bacterial isolates; there were significantly higher gram-positive bacteria (70.1 %) than gram-negative bacteria (29.9%) (P = 0.01) (<xref ref-type="table" rid="gt4">Table 1</xref>).</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt4">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<title>The correlation between the number of years from 2018 to 2023 and isolated gram negative and gram positive bacteria</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 1 The correlation between the number of years from 2018 to 2023 and isolated gram negative and gram positive bacteria</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="692082787003_gt5.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text>Table 1 The correlation between the number of years from 2018 to 2023 and isolated gram negative and gram positive bacteria</alt-text>
</graphic>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>The main bacteria isolated from the SSI was <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> (37.8%) followed by <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> (23.6%), <italic>Pseudomonas </italic>
<italic>aeruginosa </italic>(11.4%), <italic>Klebsiella </italic>
<italic>pneumonia </italic>(8.3%), <italic>Escherichia coli</italic> (5.3%), <italic>Alpha</italic>
<italic>haemolytic</italic>
<italic>Streptococcus</italic> (3.8%), <italic>Candida albicans</italic> (3.78%), <italic>Corynebacterium</italic> (2.27%), <italic>Proteus </italic>
<italic>mirabilis </italic>(1.5%), <italic>Bacilluscereus</italic> (1.5%), and <italic>Acinobacter</italic> (0.75). <xref ref-type="table" rid="gt5">Table 2</xref> summarizes the sensitivity results of the antibiotics tested with isolated bacteria , there were 30% of bacteria sensitive to Ceftriaxone, 11.8% were sensitive to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, while 38% of isolates were resistant to Ceftriaxone and 76.5% were resistant to Amoxicillin/clavulanic acid.</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt5">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<title>The results of antibiotic sensitivity test in all bacteria isolated</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 2 The results of antibiotic sensitivity test in all bacteria isolated</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="692082787003_gt6.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text>Table 2 The results of antibiotic sensitivity test in all bacteria isolated</alt-text>
</graphic>
</table-wrap>
</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>
<bold> DISCUSSION </bold>
</title>
<p>Wound infections are still regarded as the most common nosocomial infections in patients undergoing surgery. The hospital environment and equipment’s may act as a reservoir of pathogens contributing to cross transmission at patient's surgical sites [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref15">15</xref>]. Therefore the lack of cleaning hospital surfaces with germicide disinfectant may increase the prevalence of serious infections including surgical site infection that caused mostly by <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> and other pathogens including <italic>Klebsiella </italic>
<italic>pneumonia, Pseudomonas aeruginosa</italic> and <italic>Escherichia. coli</italic> [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref16">16</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref17">17</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref19">19</xref>]. This study in agreement with the previous finding, and the <italic>Staphylococcus</italic>
<italic>aureus </italic>(37.8%) was the most common pathogen isolated from C-section delivery followed by <italic>Staphylococcus epidermidis</italic> (23.6%), <italic>Pseudomonas </italic>
<italic>aeruginosa</italic> (11.4%) and the lowest isolated was <italic>Acinobacter</italic> (0.75%).</p>
<p>There is a wide range of studies that have been published globally reporting that the SSI after Cesarean section varies from 3.0% in Turkey, 5.5% in the USA, 9.5% in Saudi Arabia, 14.4% in Jordan, 18.8% in Malaysia and  up to 23.5% in Brazil [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref6">6</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref20">20</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref21">21</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref22">22</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref23">23</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref24">24</xref>]. The SSI rate of our study was 2.94%, which is at the lower limit of infection rate compared with the global prevalence rate and less than the average rate observed by the World Health Organization (3–15%) [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref2">2</xref>]. There are many factors involved in reducing SSI rate including, patients clinical situation, hospital stay after Cesarean section and the understanding of infection prevention among hospital health workers [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref25">25</xref>].</p>
<p>The raise of antimicrobial resistance globally threatens the effective prevention and treatment of infections following Cesarean section, which increases the risk of disease spread, severe illness and death [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref14">14</xref>], while the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) for Cesarean section provides a 30–65% reduction of wound infections among women who undergo either elective or emergent C-section delivery [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref26">26</xref>]. The Cephalosporines and Penicillins are the most common antibiotic that have been used in Cesarean section [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref27">27</xref>]. In this study the Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole were used routinely as SAP pre, intra and post-operative up to 2 days for all patients undergoing Cesarean section surgery, remarkably the bacterial isolates were sensitive to most antibiotics tested, among them 30% of bacterial isolates were sensitive to Ceftriaxone.  This might explain the low SSI rate following Cesarean section, although other study in people's hospital of Linyi in China prescribed Ceftriaxone and Sulbactam antibiotic after Cesarean section showed the SSI rate was 27% [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref28">28</xref>]. The resistance rate to SAP might increase the SSI rates. As seen in a study in western Nepal the SSI rate was 64.5% with 87.3% of bacterial isolates resistant to Ceftriaxone. A further study in northeast Ethiopia showed SSI rate at 14.5% with Ceftriaxone resistance rate at 73.9 %. In our study, the SSI rate was 2.94 % with Ceftriaxone resistance rate 38%. This may contribute to the low rate of SSI after Cesarean section surgery, which is disagree with Rwanda, study were the SSI rate after Caesarean section was 5.7% with 92% Ceftriaxone resistant rate among bacterial isolates [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref18">18</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref29">29</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref30">30</xref>].</p>
<p>The resistance rate against antibiotics among the bacterial isolates in this study were mostly resistant to Penicillin, Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid and Ampicillin (89.4%, 76.5% and 58.7% respectively). In addition, it was mostly sensitive to Meropenem and Imipenem (97.1% and 95.6% respectively) which is in agreement with the study in northeast Ethiopia that showed <italic>Staphylococcus</italic> species 100% resistant to penicillin and 98.2% of gram negative bacteria resistant to Ampicillin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref29">29</xref>]. Similar results were observed in Nigeria, were 85% of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> were resistant to ampicillin and 90% resistant to penicillin [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref31">31</xref>], while another study showed 100% of <italic>Staphylococcus aureus</italic> isolated were resistant to Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid and meropenem [<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_692082787003_ref6">6</xref>].</p>
<p>In conclusion, many clinical trials have been explored to reduce the SSI rate following Cesarean section. In this study, the SSI rate was at the lowest limit of infection rate when compared with other studies worldwide, as well as the bacterial isolates were sensitive to many antibiotics tested.  This is largely due to the pre, intra and postoperative antibiotics prophylaxis used, short hospital stay after Caesarean section and staff education in sterilization, scrub techniques and wound dressing techniques. This study recommends the use of Ceftriaxone and Metronidazole as SAP for Caesarean section surgery and further studies required to assess the SSI rate and determine the efficiency of prophylactic antibiotics used in alternative surgical procedures Libya.</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>
<bold> CONFLICT OF INTERESTS </bold>
</title>
<p>The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. The authors declared that this study has received no financial support.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>1.Zejnullahu VA, Isjanovska R, Sejfija Z, Zejnullahu VA. Surgical site infections after cesarean sections at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: rates, microbiological profile and risk factors. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4383-7.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Surgical site infections after cesarean sections at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: rates, microbiological profile and risk factors</article-title>
<source>Zejnullahu VA, Isjanovska R, Sejfija Z, Zejnullahu VA. Surgical site infections after cesarean sections at the University Clinical Center of Kosovo: rates, microbiological profile and risk factors. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4383-7.</source>
<year>2019</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>2.Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:81-8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98876.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges</article-title>
<source>Zuarez-Easton S, Zafran N, Garmi G, Salim R. Postcesarean wound infection: prevalence, impact, prevention, and management challenges. Int J Womens Health. 2017;9:81-8. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S98876.</source>
<year>2017</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>3.Young PY, Khadaroo RG. Surgical site infections. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(6):1245-64. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.08.008.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Surgical site infections</article-title>
<source>Young PY, Khadaroo RG. Surgical site infections. Surg Clin North Am. 2014;94(6):1245-64. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2014.08.008.</source>
<year>2014</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>4.Mpogoro FJ, Mshana SE, Mirambo MM, Kidenya BR, Gumodoka B, Imirzalioglu C. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2014;3:25. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-3-25.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>ncidence and predictors of surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania</article-title>
<source>Mpogoro FJ, Mshana SE, Mirambo MM, Kidenya BR, Gumodoka B, Imirzalioglu C. Incidence and predictors of surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Bugando Medical Centre, Mwanza, Tanzania. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2014;3:25. doi: 10.1186/2047-2994-3-25.</source>
<year>2014</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>5.Getaneh T, Negesse A, Dessie G. Prevalence of surgical site infection and its associated factors after cesarean section in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03005-8.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Prevalence of surgical site infection and its associated factors after cesarean section in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis</article-title>
<source>Getaneh T, Negesse A, Dessie G. Prevalence of surgical site infection and its associated factors after cesarean section in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20(1):311. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03005-8.</source>
<year>2020</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>6.Njoku CO, Njoku AN. Microbiological Pattern of Surgical Site Infection Following Caesarean Section at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(9):1430-5. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.286.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Microbiological Pattern of Surgical Site Infection Following Caesarean Section at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital</article-title>
<source>Njoku CO, Njoku AN. Microbiological Pattern of Surgical Site Infection Following Caesarean Section at the University of Calabar Teaching Hospital. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2019;7(9):1430-5. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.286.</source>
<year>2019</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>7.Gomaa K, Abdelraheim AR, El Gelany S, Khalifa EM, Yousef AM, Hassan H. Incidence, risk factors and management of post cesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a five year retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04054-3.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Incidence, risk factors and management of post cesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a five year retrospective study</article-title>
<source>Gomaa K, Abdelraheim AR, El Gelany S, Khalifa EM, Yousef AM, Hassan H. Incidence, risk factors and management of post cesarean section surgical site infection (SSI) in a tertiary hospital in Egypt: a five year retrospective study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04054-3.</source>
<year>2021</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>8.Gupta M, Saini V. Caesarean Section: Mortality and Morbidity. JCDR. 2018;12(9): QE01-QE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/37034.11994.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Caesarean Section: Mortality and Morbidity</article-title>
<source>Gupta M, Saini V. Caesarean Section: Mortality and Morbidity. JCDR. 2018;12(9): QE01-QE06. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2018/37034.11994.</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>9.Alnajjar MS, Alashker DA. Surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Emirati teaching hospital: Incidence and implicated factors. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75582-9.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Emirati teaching hospital: Incidence and implicated factors</article-title>
<source>Alnajjar MS, Alashker DA. Surgical site infections following caesarean sections at Emirati teaching hospital: Incidence and implicated factors. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18702. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75582-9.</source>
<year>2020</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>10.Regmi A, Ojha N, Singh M, Ghimire A, Kharel N. Risk Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infection following Cesarean Section in Tertiary Care Hospital, Nepal. Int J Reprod Med. 2022;2022:4442453. doi: 10.1155/2022/4442453.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Risk Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infection following Cesarean Section in Tertiary Care Hospital, Nepal</article-title>
<source>Regmi A, Ojha N, Singh M, Ghimire A, Kharel N. Risk Factors Associated with Surgical Site Infection following Cesarean Section in Tertiary Care Hospital, Nepal. Int J Reprod Med. 2022;2022:4442453. doi: 10.1155/2022/4442453.</source>
<year>2022</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>11.Al Jama FE. Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section. Qatar Med J. 2013;2012(2):26-31. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2012.2.9.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section</article-title>
<source>Al Jama FE. Risk factors for wound infection after lower segment cesarean section. Qatar Med J. 2013;2012(2):26-31. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2012.2.9.</source>
<year>2013</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>12.Patini R, Mangino G, Martellacci L, Quaranta G, Masucci L, Gallenzi P. The Effect of Different Antibiotic Regimens on Bacterial Resistance: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9(1):22. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9010022.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>The Effect of Different Antibiotic Regimens on Bacterial Resistance: A Systematic Review</article-title>
<source>Patini R, Mangino G, Martellacci L, Quaranta G, Masucci L, Gallenzi P. The Effect of Different Antibiotic Regimens on Bacterial Resistance: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;9(1):22. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9010022.</source>
<year>2020</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>13.Handa VL, Patel BN, Bhattacharya DA, Kothari RK, Kavathia DG, Vyas BRM. A study of antibiotic resistance pattern of clinical bacterial pathogens isolated from patients in a tertiary care hospital. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1383989. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1383989.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>A study of antibiotic resistance pattern of clinical bacterial pathogens isolated from patients in a tertiary care hospital</article-title>
<source>Handa VL, Patel BN, Bhattacharya DA, Kothari RK, Kavathia DG, Vyas BRM. A study of antibiotic resistance pattern of clinical bacterial pathogens isolated from patients in a tertiary care hospital. Front Microbiol. 2024;15:1383989. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1383989.</source>
<year>2024</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>14.Aslam B, Khurshid M, Arshad MI, Muzammil S, Rasool M, Yasmeen N, et al. Antibiotic Resistance: One Health One World Outlook. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Nov 25;11:771510. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.771510. Erratum in: Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1488430. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1488430.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Antibiotic Resistance: One Health One World Outlook</article-title>
<source>Aslam B, Khurshid M, Arshad MI, Muzammil S, Rasool M, Yasmeen N, et al. Antibiotic Resistance: One Health One World Outlook. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Nov 25;11:771510. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2021.771510. Erratum in: Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2024;14:1488430. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1488430.</source>
<year>2024</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="webpage">
<italic>15.Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol. American Society for Microbiology. 2009. Available from: <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://asm.org/getattachment/2594ce26-bd44-47f6-8287-0657aa9185ad/Kirby-Bauer-Disk-Diffusion-Susceptibility-Test-Protocol-pdf.pdf">https://asm.org/getattachment/2594ce26-bd44-47f6-8287-0657aa9185ad/Kirby-Bauer-Disk-Diffusion-Susceptibility-Test-Protocol-pdf.pdf</ext-link> (accessed May 2024).</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="webpage">
<source>Hudzicki J. Kirby-Bauer Disk Diffusion Susceptibility Test Protocol. American Society for Microbiology. 2009. Available from: https://asm.org/getattachment/2594ce26-bd44-47f6-8287-0657aa9185ad/Kirby-Bauer-Disk-Diffusion-Susceptibility-Test-Protocol-pdf.pdf (accessed May 2024).</source>
<year>2024</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://asm.org/getattachment/2594ce26-bd44-47f6-8287-0657aa9185ad/Kirby-Bauer-Disk-Diffusion-Susceptibility-Test-Protocol-pdf.pdf">https://asm.org/getattachment/2594ce26-bd44-47f6-8287-0657aa9185ad/Kirby-Bauer-Disk-Diffusion-Susceptibility-Test-Protocol-pdf.pdf</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>16.Suleyman G, Alangaden G, Bardossy AC. The Role of Environmental Contamination in the Transmission of Nosocomial Pathogens and Healthcare-Associated Infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2018;20(6):12. doi: 10.1007/s11908-018-0620-2.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>The Role of Environmental Contamination in the Transmission of Nosocomial Pathogens and Healthcare-Associated Infections</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Suleyman G, Alangaden G, Bardossy AC. The Role of Environmental Contamination in the Transmission of Nosocomial Pathogens and Healthcare-Associated Infections. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2018;20(6):12. doi: 10.1007/s11908-018-0620-2</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>17.Jido T, Garba I. Surgical-site Infection Following Cesarean Section in Kano, Nigeria. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2012;2(1):33-6. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.96934.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Surgical-site Infection Following Cesarean Section in Kano, Nigeria</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Jido T, Garba I. Surgical-site Infection Following Cesarean Section in Kano, Nigeria. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2012;2(1):33-6. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.96934</source>
<year>2012</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>18.Khatiwada S, Acharya S, Poudel R, Raut S, Khanal R, Lal Karna S, et al. Antibiotics Sensitivity Pattern of Post-Operative Wound Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Western Nepal. Research Square. 2020. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-38900/v1.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Antibiotics Sensitivity Pattern of Post-Operative Wound Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Western Nepal</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Khatiwada S, Acharya S, Poudel R, Raut S, Khanal R, Lal Karna S, et al. Antibiotics Sensitivity Pattern of Post-Operative Wound Infections in a Tertiary Care Hospital, Western Nepal. Research Square. 2020. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-38900/v1</source>
<year>2020</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>19.Anderson DJ, Kaye KS. Staphylococcal surgical site infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009;23(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.004.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Staphylococcal surgical site infections</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Anderson DJ, Kaye KS. Staphylococcal surgical site infections. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2009;23(1):53-72. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2008.10.004</source>
<year>2009</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>20.Leblebicioglu H, Erben N, Rosenthal VD, Sener A, Uzun C, Senol G, et al. Surgical site infection rates in 16 cities in Turkey: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.09.017.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Surgical site infection rates in 16 cities in Turkey: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC)</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Leblebicioglu H, Erben N, Rosenthal VD, Sener A, Uzun C, Senol G, et al. Surgical site infection rates in 16 cities in Turkey: findings of the International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC). Am J Infect Control. 2015;43(1):48-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2014.09.017</source>
<year>2015</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>21.Moulton LJ, Munoz JL, Lachiewicz M, Liu X, Goje O. Surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: incidence and risk factors at a US academic institution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(14):1873-80. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1330882.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: incidence and risk factors at a US academic institution</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Moulton LJ, Munoz JL, Lachiewicz M, Liu X, Goje O. Surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: incidence and risk factors at a US academic institution. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018;31(14):1873-80. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1330882</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>22.Eltahawy AT, Mokhtar AA, Khalaf RM, Bahnassy AA. Postoperative wound infection at a university hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J Hosp Infect. 1992;21(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90156-g.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Postoperative wound infection at a university hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Eltahawy AT, Mokhtar AA, Khalaf RM, Bahnassy AA. Postoperative wound infection at a university hospital in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. J Hosp Infect. 1992;21(1):79-83. doi: 10.1016/0195-6701(92)90156-g</source>
<year>1992</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>23.Abdel Jalil MH, Abu Hammour K, Alsous M, Awad W, Hadadden R, Bakri F, et al. Surgical site infections following caesarean operations at a Jordanian teaching hospital: Frequency and implicated factors. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12431-2.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Surgical site infections following caesarean operations at a Jordanian teaching hospital: Frequency and implicated factors</italic>
</article-title>
<source>bdel Jalil MH, Abu Hammour K, Alsous M, Awad W, Hadadden R, Bakri F, et al. Surgical site infections following caesarean operations at a Jordanian teaching hospital: Frequency and implicated factors. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12210. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-12431-2</source>
<year>2017</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>24.Jasim HH, Sulaiman SA, Khan AH, Dawood OT, Abdulameer AH, Usha R. Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection among patients undergoing cesarean section. Clin Med Insights Ther. 2017;9:1-7. doi:10.1177/1179559X17725273.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection among patients undergoing cesarean section</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Jasim HH, Sulaiman SA, Khan AH, Dawood OT, Abdulameer AH, Usha R. Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection among patients undergoing cesarean section. Clin Med Insights Ther. 2017;9:1-7. doi:10.1177/1179559X17725273</source>
<year>2017</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref25">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>25.Barbut F, Carbonne B, Truchot F, Spielvogel C, Jannet D, Goderel I, et al. [Surgical site infections after cesarean section: results of a five-year prospective surveillance]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004;33(6 Pt 1):487-96. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96561-1.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>[Surgical site infections after cesarean section: results of a five-year prospective surveillance]</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Barbut F, Carbonne B, Truchot F, Spielvogel C, Jannet D, Goderel I, et al. [Surgical site infections after cesarean section: results of a five-year prospective surveillance]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004;33(6 Pt 1):487-96. doi: 10.1016/s0368-2315(04)96561-1</source>
<year>2004</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>26.Cardoso Del Monte MC, Pinto Neto AM. Postdischarge surveillance following cesarean section: the incidence of surgical site infection and associated factors. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(6):467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.10.008.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Postdischarge surveillance following cesarean section: the incidence of surgical site infection and associated factors</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Cardoso Del Monte MC, Pinto Neto AM. Postdischarge surveillance following cesarean section: the incidence of surgical site infection and associated factors. Am J Infect Control. 2010;38(6):467-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2009.10.008</source>
<year>2010</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>27.Williams MJ, Carvalho Ribeiro do Valle C, Gyte GM. Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3(3):CD008726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub3.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Williams MJ, Carvalho Ribeiro do Valle C, Gyte GM. Different classes of antibiotics given to women routinely for preventing infection at caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;3(3):CD008726. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008726.pub3</source>
<year>2021</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>28.Liu R, Lin L, Wang D. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(2):961-4. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3350.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Liu R, Lin L, Wang D. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in caesarean section delivery. Exp Ther Med. 2016;12(2):961-4. doi: 10.3892/etm.2016.3350</source>
<year>2016</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>29.Ali A, Gebretsadik D, Desta K. Incidence of surgical site infection, bacterial isolate, and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among patients who underwent surgery at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med. 2023;11:20503121231172345. doi: 10.1177/20503121231172345.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Incidence of surgical site infection, bacterial isolate, and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among patients who underwent surgery at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia.</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Ali A, Gebretsadik D, Desta K. Incidence of surgical site infection, bacterial isolate, and their antimicrobial susceptibility pattern among patients who underwent surgery at Dessie Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, Northeast Ethiopia. SAGE Open Med. 2023;11:20503121231172345. doi: 10.1177/20503121231172345</source>
<year>2023</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>30.Velin L, Umutesi G, Riviello R, Muwanguzi M, Bebell LM, Yankurije M, et al. Surgical Site Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance After Cesarean Section Delivery in Rural Rwanda. Ann Glob Health. 2021;87(1):77. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3413.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Surgical Site Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance After Cesarean Section Delivery in Rural Rwanda</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Velin L, Umutesi G, Riviello R, Muwanguzi M, Bebell LM, Yankurije M, et al. Surgical Site Infections and Antimicrobial Resistance After Cesarean Section Delivery in Rural Rwanda. Ann Glob Health. 2021;87(1):77. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3413</source>
<year>2021</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_692082787003_ref31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">
<italic>31.Adegoke AA, Mvuyo T M, Okoh AI, Steve J. Studies on multiple antibiotic resistant bacterial isolated from surgical site infection. </italic>Sci Res Essays<italic>. 2010;5(24):3876-81.</italic>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>
<italic>Studies on multiple antibiotic resistant bacterial isolated from surgical site infection</italic>
</article-title>
<source>Adegoke AA, Mvuyo T M, Okoh AI, Steve J. Studies on multiple antibiotic resistant bacterial isolated from surgical site infection. Sci Res Essays. 2010;5(24):3876-81</source>
<year>2010</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>