<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model type="application/xml-dtd" href="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d3/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d3 20150301//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d3/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.1d3" specific-use="Marcalyc 1.2" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="redalyc">693</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title specific-use="original" xml:lang="es">Revista MVZ Córdoba</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher" xml:lang="es">Rev. MVZ Córdoba</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0122-0268</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1909-0544</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Universidad de Córdoba</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>
<country>Colombia</country>
<email>revistamvz@gmail.com</email>
</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="art-access-id" specific-use="redalyc">69353287017</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1133</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en">Effect of three diets in the experimental culture of the common snook (Centropomus undecimalis Bloch, 1792)</article-title>
<trans-title-group>
<trans-title xml:lang="es">Efecto de
tres dietas en el cultivo experimental del róbalo (Centropomus undecimalis Bloch,
1792)</trans-title>
</trans-title-group>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Polonía R</surname>
<given-names>Carmen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<email>natvillamizar@gmail.com</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Gaitán</surname>
<given-names>Saeko</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
<email>natvillamizar@gmail.com</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Chaparro M</surname>
<given-names>Nicolás</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
<email>natvillamizar@gmail.com</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Villamizar V</surname>
<given-names>Natalia</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/>
<email>natvillamizar@gmail.com</email>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad
del Magdalena, Instituto de Investigaciones Tropicales, Laboratorio 8, Grupo de
Investigación de Biodiversidad y Ecología Aplicada (GIBEA), Carrera 32 No
22–08, C.P. 470004, Santa Marta, Colombia.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">1Universidad
del Magdalena</institution>
<country country="CO">Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad
del Magdalena, Instituto de Investigaciones Tropicales, Laboratorio 8, Grupo de
Investigación de Biodiversidad y Ecología Aplicada (GIBEA), Carrera 32 No
22–08, C.P. 470004, Santa Marta, Colombia.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad
del Magdalena</institution>
<country country="CO">Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad
del Magdalena, Instituto de Investigaciones Tropicales, Laboratorio 8, Grupo de
Investigación de Biodiversidad y Ecología Aplicada (GIBEA), Carrera 32 No
22–08, C.P. 470004, Santa Marta, Colombia.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad
del Magdalen</institution>
<country country="CO">Colombia</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad
del Magdalena, Instituto de Investigaciones Tropicales, Laboratorio 8, Grupo de
Investigación de Biodiversidad y Ecología Aplicada (GIBEA), Carrera 32 No
22–08, C.P. 470004, Santa Marta, Colombia</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad
del Magdalena</institution>
<country country="CO">Colombia</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
<season>September-December</season>
<year>2017</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>6287</fpage>
<lpage>6295</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>04</day>
<month>04</month>
<year>2016</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>09</day>
<month>01</month>
<year>2017</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-year>2017</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Revista MVZ Córdoba</copyright-holder>
<ali:free_to_read/>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">
<ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>
<bold>   Objective.</bold> To evaluate the effect of three diets on the growth of juvenile common snook (Centropomus undecimalis) maintained in freshwater ponds <bold>Materials and methods.</bold> 108 juvenile of common snook were homogenous and randomly distributed in a pond, divided into 9 corrals of 50 m2. Three diets were applied (D1: commercial food for trout, 45% protein; D2: commercial food for cobia, 50% protein and D3: fresh fish, 17.52% protein). The experimental treatments were assigned in triplicate and diets were supplied in two daily doses. Biometrics were performed every 20 days to assess: weight, size, Length-Weight correlation, Feed Conversion Factor (FCA), Condition Factor (K), Specific Growth Rate (SGR) and survival; during 120 days. The results were evaluated with a one-way ANOVA, when differences (p&lt;0.05) were found the means were compared by test Median Mood, otherwise a pos-hoc test was performed (Tukey HSD). <bold>Results</bold>. Applying the test of Mood Median significant differences were found, showing the highest growth with D2, where values of SGR=0.65±0.09 g/day; FCA=3.76 and K=0.81±0.06. Survival was D1=51.4%, D2=50% and D3=77.8% without inferring statistically among the different diets.  <bold>Conclusions.</bold> The culture of this species in freshwater ponds with commercial food for cobia, is viable in terms of growth and weight gain.  </p>
</abstract>
<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
<title>Resumen</title>
<p>
<bold>   Objetivo.</bold> Evaluar el efecto de tres dietas sobre el desempeño de juveniles de róbalo (Centropomus undecimalis) mantenidos en estanques de agua dulce. <bold>Materiales y métodos.</bold> 108 juveniles de róbalo fueron distribuidos homogénea y aleatoriamente en un estanque dividido en 9 corrales de 50 m2. Se suministraron tres dietas (D1: alimento comercial para truchas, 45% de proteína; D2: alimento comercial para cobia, 50% de proteína y D3: pescado fresco, 17.52% de proteína). Los tratamientos experimentales fueron asignados por triplicado y se les suministró cada dieta en dos dosis diarias. Se realizaron biometrías cada 20 días evaluando: peso, talla, relación Longitud-Peso, Factor de Conversión Alimenticia (FCA), Factor de Condición (K), Tasa Específica de Crecimiento (SGR) y supervivencia final; durante 120 días. Los resultados fueron evaluados con un ANOVA a una vía, cuando no se encontraron diferencias (p&gt;0.05) las medias fueron comparadas mediante la prueba de la Mediana de Mood. En caso de significación estadística del ANOVA, se aplicó la prueba de comparación múltiple de Tukey HSD. <bold>Resultados</bold>. Se encontraron diferencias estadísticas entre los tratamientos, mostrando los mayores crecimientos y rendimientos con D2, con valores de SGR=0.65±0.09 g/día; FCA=3.76 y K=0.81±0.06. La supervivencia fue D1=51.4%, D2=50% y D3=77.8% sin diferir estadísticamente entre las diferentes dietas. <bold>Conclusiones</bold>. El cultivo de esta especie en estanques de agua dulce con suministro de alimento comercial para cobia es viable en términos de crecimiento y ganancia en peso.  </p>
</trans-abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
<title>Palabras clave</title>
<kwd>acuicultura</kwd>
<kwd>alimentación</kwd>
<kwd>bioensayos</kwd>
<kwd>índice de crecimiento</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>aquaculture</kwd>
<kwd>feeding</kwd>
<kwd>bioassays</kwd>
<kwd>growth rate</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="3"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="13"/>
</counts>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
		
		<sec>
            <title>
<bold>INTRODUCTION</bold>
</title>
			
			
		<p> The genus Centropomus has a wide distribution throughout the American continent: from the west coast of the Atlantic Ocean, starting from North America (Florida) to South America (Rio de Janeiro, Brasil); including the Gulf of Mexico in the Caribbean Sea (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref1">1</xref>). The common snook Centropomus undecimalis is a migratory, euryhaline and hermaphrodite fish (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref2">2</xref>). </p>
<p> This species is considered a promising candidate for aquaculture due to its adaptation to abrupt environmental changes such as salinity, oxygen, adaptation to captivity and commercial diets; moreover, it has a good quality flesh which is widely marketed (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref3">3</xref>). The fisheries of common snook represent one of the main economical and subsistence activities performed by coastal communities, which in turn has caused the overexploitation of the common snook natural stocks (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref2">2</xref>). </p>
<p> The aquaculture field represents an interesting solution to the decrease in the availability of the resource. However, there are several factors that must be investigated in order to establish the viability of the common snook culture; among those factors is feeding, which represents a crucial aspect due to the nutrition specificity, its acceptance, availability and economical costs (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref4">4</xref>).  </p>
<p> Therefore, the present study evaluated the performance of common shook juveniles when fed with three experimental diets which are commercially available in the country: trout (45% protein) and cobia (50% protein) feed and raw fish (17.5% protein). The aim of the study is to contribute baseline knowledge for the construction of a technological protocol of the culture of common snook, which in turn could increase the socieconomical alternatives for local communities and the restocking programs.  </p>
<p> Statystical Analysis. The obtained data was analyzed for normality and variance homogeneity by means of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Bartlett tests respectively. After normality and homogeneity were fulfilled, a one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) was performed in order to establish if significantly differences among the groups existed (p=0.05). When this was the case, a Tukey HSD post-hoc test was applied in order to examine the diet effect among the treatments. Otherwise, the test Mood median test was performed to evaluated the hypothesis of similarity among medians trough Chi-squared (X2) so the best diet for common snook C. undecimalis could be identified. Statistical Analysis were applied using the Statgraphic Centurion XVI.I software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref6">6</xref>). </p>
</sec>
	<sec>
<title>
<bold>MATERIALS AND
METHODS</bold>
</title>
<p>
<bold> Location and study area description.</bold> This study was performed at the Experimental Aquaculture Station located at University del Magdalena (Santa Marta, Colombia), with geographical coordinates 11°13’24.82” of Northern latitude and 74°11’07.14” of West Longitude. The water used for the study was taken from a water bore and no further treatment was applied. </p>
<p>
<bold> Biological Material and experimental units</bold>. 108 common snook Centropomus undecimalis juveniles were used (282.8±11.5 g weight and 34.2±5.5 cm length). Fish were captured with an 8 mm net at the Ciénaga Grande de Santa Marta, and were acclimated in a 1 m3 tank for 48 h during which salinity was decreased from 33.9±3.3 UPS to 0-0.5 UPS. Once acclimation ended, fish were treated with a prophylactic protocol involving formalin baths (150 ppm) for 15 min, and then fish were transferred to a 620 m3 water pond divided in nine corrals.  </p>
<p>
<bold> Experimental diet.</bold> Three treatments of commercial feeds were applied: D1 (trout fed – 45% protein, 12% humidity, 14% fat, 12% ash and 6% fiber), D2 (cobia fed – 50% protein, 12% humidity, 15% ash, 2.5% fiber and 8% fat) and D3 (raw fish – 17.5% raw protein, 1.75% ethereal extract, 2.89% ash and 2.22% carbohydrates). Each treatment had 36 fish and three replicates randomly distributed. Feed was provided to the fish twice a day (11:30 y 17:00 h) at 3% of biomass for 120 days. </p>
<p> Every 20 days biometric data was recorded (total length and wet weight) in 24 fish per treatment, which were randomly collected. Weight gain (g) was recorded with a digital scale (LEXUS MIX-SL, precision=0.01 g) and length increase in cm. In order to avoid stress during the sampling fish were sedated with clove oil (20-40 ppm) and wet clothes were used for manipulation to prevent scales and mucus loss.  </p>
<p>
<bold> Evaluated parameters.</bold> As indicators of performance the following variables were evaluated: length-weight relationship, feed conversion factor (FCF), condition factor (CF), specific growth rate (SGR) and final survival. </p>
<p> Length-weight relationship: evaluated through lineal regression (least squares), calculating the values for a and b from the equation: </p>
<p> W=aLb [1] </p>
<p> W being the total weight in g and L the total length in cm; a and b are constants obtained from the potential regression analysis (5).  </p>
<p> Feed conversion factor (FCF). This indicates the amount of feed that is needed in order to increase a weight unit (2). </p>
<p> FCA= food ingested/ (final weight – initial weight) [2] </p>
<p>
<bold> Condition Factor (K)</bold>. Is the final condition state of an organism, calculated with Fulton’s index: </p>
<p> K=100 (W/L3) [3] </p>
<p> W being the wet weight in g and L the length in cm (2). </p>
<p>
<bold> Specific growth rate (SGR)</bold>. SGR estimates the growth daily rate: </p>
<p> SGR=100*[LnPf – LnPi]/t [4] </p>
<p> LnPf= natural logarithm of the final weight, LnPi= natural logarithm of the initial weight y t being the time in days (2). </p>
<p> Survival was registered at the end of the experimental period. </p>
<p> Every day, physical and chemical parameters were recorded: temperature (°C±0.2), salinity (UPS  ±1  ), dissolved oxygen (mg/L  ±0.5  ) and pH   (±0.02)   by means of a multiparameter (WTW Multi 350i); a final nutrients follow up was also performed: alkalinity (mg/L), nitrates (mg/L), nitrites (mg/L), hardness (mg/L), phosphates (mg/L) y chlorine (mg/L) by means of colorimetric kits (Merck KGaA).  </p>
<p>
<bold> Statystical Analysis. </bold>The obtained data was analyzed for normality and variance homogeneity by means of Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Bartlett tests respectively. After normality and homogeneity were fulfilled, a one-way variance analysis (ANOVA) was performed in order to establish if significantly differences among the groups existed (p=0.05). When this was the case, a Tukey HSD post-hoc test was applied in order to examine the diet effect among the treatments. Otherwise, the test Mood median test was performed to evaluated the hypothesis of similarity among medians trough Chi-squared (X2) so the best diet for common snook C. undecimalis could be identified. Statistical Analysis were applied using the Statgraphic Centurion XVI.I software (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref6">6</xref>).</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>
<bold>RESULTS</bold>
</title>
<p> Monthly mean values of physical and chemical parameters did not differ among treatments or experimental units (<xref ref-type="table" rid="gt1">Table 1</xref>). Water quality indexes showed that nitrites, nitrates and chlorine values were among the recommended range for fish culture, while alkalinity (&gt;150 mg/L CaCO3), hardness (&gt;300 mg/L CaCO3) and phosphates (minor eutrophication &gt;0.2 mg/L PO4 –P), were high (<xref ref-type="table" rid="gt2">Table 2</xref>). </p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Table 1.</bold> Physico-chemical parameters during the bioassay
juvenile C. undecimalis grown in a freshwater pond.</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 1 Table 1. Physico-chemical parameters during the bioassay
juvenile C. undecimalis grown in a freshwater pond.</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="69353287017_gt1.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="margin-left:.4pt;border-collapse:collapse;" id="gt1-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:15.85pt">
<td style="width:116.95pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Parameter
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:98.5pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Month 1
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:100.9pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Month 2
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:96.3pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Month 3
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:110.4pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Month 4
  </bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.85pt">
<td style="width:116.95pt;border-top:none;border-left:solid black 1.0pt;   border-bottom:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  Temperature
  (°C)
  </td>
<td style="width:98.5pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;         padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  30.5±0.63
  </td>
<td style="width:100.9pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;         padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  30.9±0.42
  </td>
<td style="width:96.3pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;         padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  29.8±0.33
  </td>
<td style="width:110.4pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;         padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  29.7±0.24
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.85pt">
<td style="width:116.95pt;border-top:none;border-left:solid black 1.0pt;   border-bottom:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  O2  (mg/L)
  </td>
<td style="width:98.5pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  4.75±1.05
  </td>
<td style="width:100.9pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  4.66±0.21
  </td>
<td style="width:96.3pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  4.53±0.23
  </td>
<td style="width:110.4pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  4.62±0.35
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.85pt">
<td style="width:116.95pt;border-top:none;border-left:solid black 1.0pt;   border-bottom:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  pH
  </td>
<td style="width:98.5pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  6.94±0.60
  </td>
<td style="width:100.9pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  7.64±0.11
  </td>
<td style="width:96.3pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  7.55±0.12
  </td>
<td style="width:110.4pt;border:none;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  7.68±0.20
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.85pt">
<td style="width:116.95pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-top:none;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  Salinity
  (UPS)
  </td>
<td style="width:98.5pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  0.28±0.04
  </td>
<td style="width:100.9pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  0.13±0.02
  </td>
<td style="width:96.3pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  0.16±0.02
  </td>
<td style="width:110.4pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:15.85pt;text-align:center;">
  0.23±0.02
  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Table 2.</bold> Water nutrients end of the
experimental cultivation of juvenile sea bass in fresh water pond.</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 2 Table 2. Water nutrients end of the
experimental cultivation of juvenile sea bass in fresh water pond.</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="69353287017_gt2.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="border-collapse:collapse;" id="gt2-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:12.35pt">
<td style="width:331.3pt;border-top:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:   none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:none;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Nutrients
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:176.85pt;border-top:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:   none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:none;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Value
  </bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.35pt">
<td style="width:331.3pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  Alkalinity
  (mg/L CaCO3)
  </td>
<td style="width:176.85pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  283±5.2
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.35pt">
<td style="width:331.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  Nitrites
  (mg/L)
  </td>
<td style="width:176.85pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  600±13.0
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.35pt">
<td style="width:331.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  Nitrates
  (mg/L)
  </td>
<td style="width:176.85pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  2.34±1.31
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.35pt">
<td style="width:331.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  Dourness
  (mg/L CaCO3)
  </td>
<td style="width:176.85pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  0.32±0.3
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.35pt">
<td style="width:331.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  Phosphates
  (mg/L PO4 –P)
  </td>
<td style="width:176.85pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  0.47±0.1
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:12.35pt">
<td style="width:331.3pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  Chlorides
  (mg/L)
  </td>
<td style="width:176.85pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:12.35pt;text-align:center;">
  155±4.0
  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>In <xref ref-type="table" rid="gt3">Table 3</xref> the growth indexes K
and SGR are shown to be higher under D2, whose values significantly differed to
the rest of the diets. The FCA of D2 did not differ with D3 data but both
values differed with D1 FCA. Furthermore, the Mood Median test indicated
statistical differences in weight gain between D2 when compared to D1 and D3
(p&lt;0.0428). Fish fed with D2 recorded the highest final weight (630.2±29.6
g), SGR, (0.65±0.09 g/day), and K (0.81±0.06).</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt3">
<label>Tabla 3</label>
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Tabla 3.</bold> Factors related to the growth of
juvenile common snook kept in ponds and fed fresh water with three commercial
diets (D1-truchina, D2-cobia, D3-fresh fish) for 120 days.</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Tabla 3 Tabla 3. Factors related to the growth of
juvenile common snook kept in ponds and fed fresh water with three commercial
diets (D1-truchina, D2-cobia, D3-fresh fish) for 120 days.</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="69353287017_gt3.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="margin-left:.4pt;border-collapse:collapse;" id="gt3-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:11.55pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:11.55pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Tratamiento.
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.55pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  D1
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.55pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  D2
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.55pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  D3
  </bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.9pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  Pi (g)
  </td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  286.8±10.5
  </td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  286.7±3.80
  </td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;border:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  276.0±11.7
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.9pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  Pf (g)
  </td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  436.1±82.9a
  </td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  630.2±29.6b
  </td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  472.0±21.7a
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.9pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  Li (cm)
  </td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  34.3±0.31
  </td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  34.2±0.52
  </td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  34.1±0.47
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.9pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  Lf (cm)
  </td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  38.8±2.50
  </td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  42.1±0,53
  </td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  39.0±0,81
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.9pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  S%
  </td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  51.4
  </td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  50
  </td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  77.8
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.9pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  FCA
  </td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  12.0a
  </td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  3.76b
  </td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  3.05b
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.9pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  K
  </td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  0.73±0.04a
  </td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  0.81±0.06b
  </td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  0.76±0.05a
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:13.9pt">
<td style="width:158.4pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  SGR
  (g/día)
  </td>
<td style="width:119.4pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  0.31±0.33a
  </td>
<td style="width:112.5pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  0.65±0.09b
  </td>
<td style="width:132.3pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:13.9pt;text-align:center;">
  0.44±0.13a
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:30.45pt">
<td style="width:522.65pt;border:none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:30.45pt" colspan="4">
  Equal exponents do not differ statistically
  (p&gt;0.05).
  Trat.= Tratamiento, Pi=Peso inicial, Pf=Peso final,
  Li=Longitud inicial Lf=Longitud final, S=supervivencia, FCA=Factor de
  conversión alimenticia, K=Factor de condición, SGR=Tasa específica de
  crecimiento.
  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p> The length-weight relationship showed isometric growth, with an estimated relationship (W=0.003L3.253) being b=3.2, with 97% of weight variability explained by the model. </p>
<p> Overall, from the 100 and 120 days of the experimental period, D2 registered the highest values, which are supported by the statistical analysis (p&lt;0.05) (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="gf1">Figure 1</xref>). </p>
<p>
<fig id="gf1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<title>Figure 1</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Figure 1 Figure 1</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="69353287017_gf1.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
</fig>
</p>
<p>No statistical differences were
detected between the survivals of the treatments (p&gt;0.05). The survivals for
D1=51.4%, D2=50% and D3=77.8% are considered acceptable for the three
treatments (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="gf3">Figure 2</xref>).</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf3">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<title>Figure 2</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Figure 2 Figure 2</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="69353287017_gf2.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
</fig>
</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>
<bold>DISCUSSION</bold>
</title>
<p> During the study period, the physical and chemical parameters registered acceptable values for aquaculture purposes. Regarding the hardness and alkalinity data, which were above the suggested range, common snook seemed to have acclimated accordingly. Although the high levels of phosphates produced a general eutrophication in the culture system, this condition did not affect any treatment or experimental unit in particular.  </p>
<p> It is not common for snook to be cultured under fresh water conditions, however the results obtained in the present study are similar to the highest data previously reported in a similar study of juvenile’s nutrition under sea water conditions (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref7">7</xref>), suggesting that water salinity does not affect this species’ growth - at least at this developmental stage. In an earlier study of common snook aquaculture, an experimental feeding based on live tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) obtained acceptable growth results (0.50 g/day), which imply that this species has an interesting potential to be cultured (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref3">3</xref>). In the present study, the daily weight gain was of 0.65 g/day, which shows that growth can be improved by means of high quality feeding.  </p>
<p> In this study, the highest data for final growth were obtained with the cobia feed (D2), which not only had the highest protein content (50%) but also all the necessary requirements for optimal performance of Rachycentron canadum, a marine fish. In a similar study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref8">8</xref>), fed semi-humid diets with a variable percentage of protein to common snook, obtained as a result that diets with a ≥40% protein brought out the highest growth performances in terms of final weight and food conversion factor. This last result is similar to the one obtained in the present study (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref8">8</xref>).  </p>
<p> Treatment D1 (trout feed) brought out the lowest FCF and SGR values which contrast with the results found by Gracia-López et al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref8">8</xref>), who registered the second highest records of these two variables, plus final growth under the trout diet. Due to the lack of information regarding the specific formulation of commercial diets, it is difficult to explain the results obtained in the present study and why they differed from previous studies. However, regarding the results reported by Gracia-López et al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref8">8</xref>), their study was performed with smaller fish. Moreover, we experienced a delay in the acceptance of the trout diet, which might have been due to the size of the pellets.  </p>
<p> Treatment D3 (raw fish) did not show significant differences with D2 regarding FCF, although differences were found in K and final weight data between these two treatments. Interestingly, the results obtained in the present study contrast sharply with those registered in Reyes et al. (2004) research, as they reported a lower performance in terms of FCF and growth of similar size juveniles of common snook that were fed with a diet composed of fish meal and raw fish (O. oglinum y Gerres sp) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref9">9</xref>).  </p>
<p> The above mentioned results show that diet formulation for fish is a complex process that it has not been well established for many species and even in those cases where a commercial specific diet is commercially available, it still might bring about metabolic problems that negatively affect its growth and survival (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref10">10</xref>). Moreover, artificial feeds designed for fresh water species should not be used in estuarine and marine fish due to the wide physiological differences existing among them (i.e. fat acid requirements) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref9">9</xref>). </p>
<p> The results obtained in other studies (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref11">11</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref12">12</xref>) regarding length-weight relationship also suggest an isometric growth as values for this parameter were between b= 2.5 – 3.5, indicating that the common snook increases proportionally in length and weight.  </p>
<p> In general, the survival data recorded by the present study are acceptable for fish that have to undergo captivity acclimation. However, previous studies have reported 90% survivals (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref3">3</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref4">4</xref>, <xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69353287017_ref13">13</xref>). For this particular issue, no causes could be singled out as mortalities were present evenly in all treatments. </p>
<p> As conclusions, the culture of common snook under fresh water conditions fed with cobia commercial feed is a viable alternative. However, more studies are needed in order to design a specific feed for the specie. Research that studies the performance on common snook under low-cost and high-availability feeds are needed with the purpose of developing an aquaculture technical protocol that could be transferred to artisanal farmers.  </p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>The present study was part of the
research project titled “Contributions to the reinforcement of mariculture of
the county by developing a production protocol of sea cucumber, strengthening
the technology of pectinids and studying the physiological and morphological
aspects related with common snook (Centropomus undecimalis) reproduction
and its experimental culture in fresh water ponds”. Cooperative special
agreement No 090 of November the the 5th, 2013; between the
Universidad del Magdalena and the Magdalena County</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref1">
<label>1</label>
<mixed-citation>1. Blewett D, Stevens P, Champeau T, Taylor R. Use of rivers by common snook Centropomus undecimalis in southwest Florida: a first step in addressing the overwintering paradigm. Biol Scien 2009; 72: 310-324.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Blewett</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Stevens</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Champeau</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Taylor</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Use of rivers by common snook Centropomus
undecimalis in southwest Florida: a first step in addressing the
overwintering paradigm.</article-title>
<source>Biol Scien</source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>72</volume>
<fpage>310</fpage>
<lpage>324</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref2">
<label>2</label>
<mixed-citation>2. Perera-García MA, Mendoza-Carranza M, Contreras-Sánchez WM, Huerta-Ortiz M, Pérez-Sánchez E. Reproductive biology of common snook Centropomus undecimalis (Perciformes: Centropomidae) in two tropical habitats. Rev Biol Trop 2011; 59(2):669–681.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Perera-García</surname>
<given-names>MA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mendoza-Carranza</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Contreras-Sánchez</surname>
<given-names>WM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Huerta-Ortiz</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pérez-Sánchez</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Reproductive biology of common snook Centropomus undecimalis
(Perciformes: Centropomidae) in two tropical habitats.</article-title>
<source>Rev Biol Trop</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>59</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>669</fpage>
<lpage>681</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref3">
<label>3</label>
<mixed-citation>3. Zarza-Meza EA, Berruecos-Villalobos JM, Vásquez-Peláez C, Álvarez-Torres P. Cultivo experimental de Robalo Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch 1792) y Chucumite Centropomus parallelus (Poey 1860) (Perciformes: Centropomidae) en agua dulce en un estanque de concreto en Alvarado, Veracruz. México. Vet Méx 2006; 37(3):327-333.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Zarza-Meza</surname>
<given-names>EA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Berruecos-Villalobos</surname>
<given-names>JM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Vásquez-Peláez</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Álvarez-Torres</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Cultivo experimental de Robalo Centropomus
undecimalis (Bloch 1792) y Chucumite Centropomus parallelus (Poey
1860) (Perciformes: Centropomidae) en agua dulce en un estanque de concreto en
Alvarado, Veracruz. México. </article-title>
<source>Vet Méx</source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>327</fpage>
<lpage>333</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref4">
<label>4</label>
<mixed-citation>4. Alvarez-Lajonchère L, Tsuzuki MY. A review of methods for Centropomus spp. (snooks) aquaculture and recommendations for the establishment of their culture in Latin America. Aqua Res 2009; 39(7):684–700.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Alvarez-Lajonchère</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tsuzuki</surname>
<given-names>MY</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title> A review of
methods for Centropomus spp. (snooks) aquaculture and recommendations
for the establishment of their culture in Latin America.</article-title>
<source>Aqua Res</source>
<year>2009</year>
<volume>39</volume>
<issue>7</issue>
<fpage>684</fpage>
<lpage>700</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref5">
<label>5</label>
<mixed-citation>5. Contreras-Sánchez WM, Contreras-García MJ, Mcdonal-Vera A, Hernández-Vidal U, Cruz-Rosado L, Martínez-García R. Manual para la producción de robalo blanco (Centropomus undecimalis) en cautiverio. 2ª Ed. Villahermosa, Tabasco, México: Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco. 2015.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Contreras-Sánchez</surname>
<given-names>WM</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Contreras-García</surname>
<given-names>MJ</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Mcdonal-Vera</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hernández-Vidal</surname>
<given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cruz-Rosado</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Martínez-García</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Villahermosa, Tabasco, México: Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco.</source>
<year>2015</year>
<edition>2ª Ed</edition>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref6">
<label>6</label>
<mixed-citation>6. Statgraphics Centurion, X.V.I. Statpoint technologies. INC. Version 16, 17. 2009;</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="software">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Statgraphics Centurion, X.V.I. Statpoint technologies. INC. Version 16, 17</surname>
<given-names>Statgraphics</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<source>Statpoint technologies. INC. Version 16</source>
<year>2009</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref7">
<label>7</label>
<mixed-citation>7. Reyes R, Ramos D, Fraga I, Galindo J, Ortega N. Creación de un  banco de progenitores de róbalo Centropomus undecimalis, Boch. Evaluación de alimentos artificiales. CIVA 2004; 814-820.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="other">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Reyes</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ramos</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Fraga</surname>
<given-names>I</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Galindo</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ortega</surname>
<given-names>N</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Creación de un banco de progenitores de róbalo Centropomus
undecimalis, Boch. Evaluación de alimentos artificiales.</article-title>
<source>CIVA</source>
<year>2004</year>
<fpage>814</fpage>
<lpage>820</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref8">
<label>8</label>
<mixed-citation>8. Gracia-López V, García-galano T, Gaxiola-Cortés G, Pachecho-Campos J. Efecto del nivel de proteína en la dieta y alimentos comerciales sobre el crecimiento y la alimentación en juveniles del róbalo blanco, Centropomus undecimalis (Bloch, 1792). Cienc Mar 2014; 29(4B):585-594.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gracia-López</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>García-galano</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gaxiola-Cortés</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pachecho-Campos</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Efecto del nivel de
proteína en la dieta y alimentos comerciales sobre el crecimiento y la
alimentación en juveniles del róbalo blanco, Centropomus undecimalis
(Bloch, 1792).</article-title>
<source>Cienc Mar</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>29</volume>
<issue>4B</issue>
<fpage>585</fpage>
<lpage>594</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref9">
<label>9</label>
<mixed-citation>9. Tocher DR. Fatty acid requirements in ontogeny of marine and freshwater fish. Aquac Res 2010; 41:717–732.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tocher</surname>
<given-names>DR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Fatty acid requirements in ontogeny of marine and freshwater fish.</article-title>
<source>Aquac Res</source>
<year>2010</year>
<volume>41</volume>
<fpage>717</fpage>
<lpage>732</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref10">
<label>10</label>
<mixed-citation>10. Shimada MT, Claudiano GS, Filho JR, Yunis J, Moraes FR. Hepatic steatosis in cage-reared young cobia, Rachycentron canadum (Linnaeus, 1766). Brazil. J Vet Sci Med Diagn 2014; 3:2.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Shimada</surname>
<given-names>MT</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Claudiano</surname>
<given-names>GS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Filho</surname>
<given-names>JR</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yunis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Moraes</surname>
<given-names>FR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Hepatic steatosis in cage-reared young cobia, Rachycentron
canadum (Linnaeus, 1766). Brazil.</article-title>
<source>J Vet Sci Med Diagn</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>3</volume>
<fpage>2</fpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref11">
<label>11</label>
<mixed-citation>11. Froese R. Cube law, condition factor and weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 2006; 22:241-253.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Froese</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Cube law, condition factor and
weight-length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations.</article-title>
<source>J. Appl. Ichthyol.</source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<fpage>241</fpage>
<lpage>253</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref12">
<label>12</label>
<mixed-citation>12. Hernández-Vidal U, Chiappa-Carrara X, Contreras-Sánchez W. Reproductive variability of the common snook, Centropomus undecimalis, in environments of contrasting salinities interconnected by the Grijalva–Usumacinta fluvial system. Inv Mar Cent Interdis Cien Mar 2014; 40(3):173-185.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hernández-Vidal</surname>
<given-names>U</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chiappa-Carrara</surname>
<given-names>X</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Contreras-Sánchez</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Reproductive variability of the common snook, Centropomus
undecimalis, in environments of contrasting salinities interconnected by
the Grijalva–Usumacinta fluvial system.</article-title>
<source>Inv Mar Cent Interdis Cien Mar</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>40</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>173</fpage>
<lpage>185</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69353287017_ref13">
<label>13</label>
<mixed-citation>13. Soligo TA, Garcia AS, Cerqueira VR. Weaning of the common snook (Centropomus undecimalis) early juveniles reared in laboratory using commercial and experimental diets. Bol. Inst. Pesca, Sao Paulo 2011; 37(4):367-374.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Soligo</surname>
<given-names>TA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Garcia</surname>
<given-names>AS</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cerqueira</surname>
<given-names>VR</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Weaning of the common snook (Centropomus
undecimalis) early juveniles reared in laboratory using commercial and
experimental diets.</article-title>
<source>Bol. Inst. Pesca, Sao Paulo</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>37</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<fpage>367</fpage>
<lpage>374</lpage>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>