<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model type="application/xml-dtd" href="http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d3/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.1d3 20150301//EN" "http://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.1d3/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" dtd-version="1.1d3" specific-use="Marcalyc 1.2" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="redalyc">693</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title specific-use="original" xml:lang="es">Revista MVZ Córdoba</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher" xml:lang="es">Rev. MVZ Córdoba</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0122-0268</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1909-0544</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Universidad de Córdoba</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>
<country>Colombia</country>
<email>revistamvz@gmail.com</email>
</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="art-access-id" specific-use="redalyc">69360322010</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1526</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Original</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en">In vitro reduction of methane with the cyanogenic glucoside Linamarin</article-title>
<trans-title-group>
<trans-title xml:lang="es">Reducción
de metano <italic>in vitro</italic> con el glucósido cianogénico Linamarina</trans-title>
</trans-title-group>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4422-3460</contrib-id>
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Zavaleta C</surname>
<given-names>Carmen</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<email>zavaleta.maria@inifap.gob.mx</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8808-1620</contrib-id>
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Orellana M</surname>
<given-names>Carla</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
<email>carla.orellanam@gmail.com</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5935-1935</contrib-id>
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Vera A</surname>
<given-names>Nelson</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/>
<email>nevera81@gmail.com</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8827-680X</contrib-id>
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Manterola B</surname>
<given-names>Hector</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/>
<email>hmantero@gmail.com</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0106-560X</contrib-id>
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Castellaro G</surname>
<given-names>Giorgio</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff5"/>
<email>gicastel@uchile.cl</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3621-2705</contrib-id>
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Parraguez G</surname>
<given-names>Víctor H</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"/>
<email>vparragu@uchile.cl</email>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas. Departamento de
Producción Animal, Santiago, Chile.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad de Chile</institution>
<country country="CL">Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas. Departamento de
Producción Animal, Santiago, Chile.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas. Departamento de
Producción Animal, Santiago, Chile.</institution>
<country country="CL">Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff3">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad
de Concepción, Facultad de Ciencias Veterinarias, Departamento
de Ciencia Animal, Vicente Méndez 595, Chillán. Chile.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad
de Concepción</institution>
<country country="CL">Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas. Departamento de
Producción Animal, Santiago, Chile</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad de Chile</institution>
<country country="CL">Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff5">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas. Departamento de
Producción Animal, Santiago, Chile.</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad de Chile, </institution>
<country country="CL">Chile</country>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas. Departamento de
Producción Animal, Santiago, Chile.  

2Universidad de
Chile, Facultad
de Ciencias Veterinarias y Pecuarias, Avenida. Santa. Rosa, 11735, Santiago, Chile</institution>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad de Chile</institution>
<country country="CL">Chile</country>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
<season>September-December</season>
<year>2019</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>24</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>7291</fpage>
<lpage>7296</lpage>
<history>
<date date-type="received" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>04</day>
<month>02</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
<date date-type="accepted" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>06</day>
<month>05</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
<date date-type="pub" publication-format="dd mes yyyy">
<day>27</day>
<month>08</month>
<year>2019</year>
</date>
</history>
<permissions>
<copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
<copyright-holder>Revista MVZ Córdoba</copyright-holder>
<ali:free_to_read/>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/">
<ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>
<bold>   Objective.</bold> To assess the effect of rising doses of the cyanogenic glucoside Linamarin on the reduction of <italic>in vitro</italic> rumen methane. <bold>Materials and methods.</bold> Rumen fluid from two fistulated Merino Precoz sheep, inoculated with a fermentation substrate comprising alfalfa hay (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic>) and ground oat grain (<italic>Avena sativa L</italic>.), and added with buffer solution and Linamarin (purity ≥98%) in rising doses, was incubated for eight hours<italic> in vitro</italic>. Methane was measured each hour with an infrared gas monitor. <bold>Results</bold>. According Linamarin doses were increased (0, 6, 13, 20 and 26 mg/L), the methane concentration fell in a linear manner (p≤0.05) by (9.7, 9.2, 18.1 and 29.4%), respectively. A significant reduction of methane was seen whit the highest dose of Linamarin. <bold>Conclusions.</bold> Linamarin, in pure state, was effective to reduce methane during <italic>in vitro</italic> ruminal fermentation. Therefore, this study constitutes a basis for future experiments including vegetable sources of Linamarin as well as other rumen variables, leading to find a strategy for reducing greenhouse gases.  </p>
</abstract>
<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
<title>Resumen</title>
<p>
<bold> Objetivo.</bold> Evaluar el efecto de dosis crecientes del glucósido cianogénico Linamarina, en la reducción de metano ruminal <italic>in vitro</italic>
<bold>.</bold>
<bold>Materiales y Métodos.</bold> Se empleó líquido ruminal de dos ovejas fistuladas de la raza Merino Precoz, con el que se inoculó un sustrato fermentativo constituido por heno de alfalfa (<italic>Medicago sativa</italic>) y grano de avena molido (<italic>Avena sativa L</italic>.), se adicionó solución buffer y Linamarina (pureza de ≥98%) en dosis crecientes, lo que se llevó a incubación por ocho horas <italic>in vitro.</italic> El metano se midió cada hora, con un monitor de gases infrarrojo. <italic>Resultados. </italic>De acuerdo con el incremento de las dosis de Linamarina (0, 6, 13, 20 y 26 mg/L), la concentración de metano disminuyó de forma lineal (p≤0.05) en (9.7, 9.2, 18.1 y 29.4%) respectivamente. Se observó una reducción significativa de metano con la dosis más alta de Linamarina. <bold>Conclusiones</bold>. La Linamarina, en su estado puro, fue eficaz en la reducción de metano durante la fermentación ruminal<italic> in vitro.</italic> Por lo tanto, este estudio constituye una base para futuros experimentos que incluyan fuentes vegetales de Linamarina y otras variables ruminales, lo que puede conducir a encontrar estrategias para reducir los gases de efecto invernadero.  </p>
</trans-abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>Food additive</kwd>
<kwd> methane production</kwd>
<kwd> rumen fermentation </kwd>
</kwd-group>
<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
<title>Palabras clave</title>
<kwd>Aditivo alimentario</kwd>
<kwd> fermentación ruminal</kwd>
<kwd> producción de metano </kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="2"/>
<table-count count="2"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="23"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>How to cite (Vancouver)</meta-name>
<meta-value>Zavaleta CC, Orellana MC, Vera AN, Manterola BH, Castellaro GG, Parraguez GP. In vitro reduction of methane with the cyanogenic glucoside Linamarin. RevMVZ Cordoba. 2019; 24(3):7291-7296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1526</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>
<bold>INTRODUCTION</bold>
</title>
<p> The rise in atmospheric greenhouse gas (GHG) concentrations (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref1">1</xref>) has accelerated climate change processes (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref2">2</xref>). The main GHG are carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>), methane (CH<sub>4</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O), which have increased by 40, 150 and 20%, respectively, since 1990 (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref3">3</xref>).  </p>
<p> With regard to CH<sub>4</sub>, it was estimated that total emissions from solely ruminant livestock in 2014 were around 97.1 million tons (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref1">1</xref>) which constituted 18 % of the total CH<sub>4</sub> released into the environment (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref4">4</xref>).  </p>
<p> During the digestive process, ruminants generate CH<sub>4</sub> made up of methanogenic bacteria, (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref5">5</xref>) which is expelled through burping (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref6">6</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref7">7</xref>), which has an environmental impact and constitutes an energy loss for the animal in the order of 5 to 12% (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref6">6</xref>). However, CH<sub>4</sub> emissions could be reduced through sanitary improvement, herd management, diet or with the inclusion of plant secondary metabolites (PSM) (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref5">5</xref>).  </p>
<p> There are different PSM, such as condensed tannins (CT), essential oils (EO) and cyanogenic glucosides (CG), with different mechanisms of action that enable them to reduce rumen CH<sub>4</sub> generation (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref8">8</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref9">9</xref>). These PSM are chemical compounds synthesized by the plant itself (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref5">5</xref>) and the primary mechanism related to the reduction of methanogenesis is the modification of antimicrobial activity (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref7">7</xref>). </p>
<p> The reducing action of the CH<sub>4</sub> production from CT and EO has been widely proven with favorable results. In this regard, when 20% of <italic>Amaranthus spinosus</italic> (plant containing CT) was replaced in an experimental diet in an<italic> in vitro</italic> fermentation trial, a 26 % reduction of CH<sub>4</sub> was obtained (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref10">10</xref>). Moreover, when clove (<italic>Syzygium aromaticum</italic>), white thyme (<italic>Thymus mastichina</italic>) and anise (<italic>Pimpinella anisum</italic>) EO were used, CH<sub>4</sub> was reduced by 37, 76 and 32%, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref8">8</xref>). Likewise, when clove EO 200 mg was used, CH<sub>4</sub> was reduced by 84.21, 69.49 and 80.34%, respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref9">9</xref>), when the substrate was a mixed diet, concentrated and hay, respectively, demonstrating the effect of PSM as CH<sub>4</sub> reducers. </p>
<p> Linamarin, a kind of CG, is found mainly in cassava (<italic>Manihot esculenta Cranz</italic>), with a higher concentration in bitter varieties. It has been observed that using cassava under<italic> in vitro </italic>conditions has an anti-methanogenic effect (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref11">11</xref>). When analyzing the concentrations of Linamarin in cassava cortex, it was found 28.40  ±  3.38 g/kg of dry weight and 7.71  ±  0.97 g/kg in fresh weight, while in cassava parenchyma it was found 14.71  ±  1.91 and 5.77  ±  0.74 g/kg in dry and fresh form respectively (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref12">12</xref>). The effect of cassava on the CH<sub>4</sub> reduction <italic>in vitro</italic> fermentation, was demonstrated whit the inclusion of 12 mg/DM of root and leaf cassava. The CH<sub>4</sub> production was 70.50  ±  1.32 and 65.70  ±  1.32 mL/g of digested cassava root or leaf DM respectively, while when cassava was not included, the CH<sub>4</sub> production was 74.2  ±  1.32 mL/g of digested DM (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref13">13</xref>). </p>
<p> Linamarin, has a potential to reduce CH<sub>4</sub> production in ruminants, when suitable doses are used. However, the effect of the inclusion of different doses of pure Linamarin <italic>in vitro</italic> is little known. The objective of this study was to quantify the effects of including rising doses of Linamarin on the CH<sub>4</sub> concentration in a period of time during <italic>in vitro </italic>ruminal fermentation.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>
<bold>MATERIALS
AND METHODS</bold>
</title>
<p>
<bold> Animal handling.</bold> Two four-years-old rumen fistulated Merino Precoz sheep were used, which were fistulated in 2014 in accordance with the protocol of the Bioethics and Animal Welfare Committee of the Faculty of Veterinary Sciences of the University of Chile. They were handled at the Dryland Young and Grazing Ruminants section of Germán Greve Silva Experiment Station, which belongs to the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the University of Chile, located in Maipú Commune, Metropolitan Region, Chile (Lat. 33º 28’ S and Long. 70º 51’ W; 470 m.a.s.l.). The experiment was conducted at the Laboratory of the Department of Animal Production of the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Chile. </p>
<p>
<bold> Diet.</bold> During the experimental period, the sheep were fed 1.2 kg of alfalfa hay and 300 g of oat grain per animal per day, dispensed in two portions, one given in the morning and the other in the afternoon. <xref ref-type="table" rid="gt1">Table 1</xref> shows the nutritional composition of the diet offered and the supplies that were used as fermentation substrates (FS) for incubation.</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt1">
<label>Table 1</label>
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Table
1</bold>. Bromatological composition of the diet supplied and
components</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table
1 Table
1. Bromatological composition of the diet supplied and
components</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="69360322010_gt2.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="margin-left:.4pt;border-collapse:collapse;" id="gt2-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:20.35pt">
<td style="width:3.0cm;border:solid black 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:20.35pt"/>
<td style="width:70.9pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:20.35pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  DM (%)
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:70.85pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:20.35pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  NDF (%)
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:63.8pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:20.35pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  ADF (%)
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:70.9pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:20.35pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  CP (%)
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:4.0cm;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:20.35pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  Energy
  (Mcal/kg DM-)
  </bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.15pt">
<td style="width:3.0cm;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-top:none;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  Alfalfa Hay
  </td>
<td style="width:70.9pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  92.84
  </td>
<td style="width:70.85pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  49.33
  </td>
<td style="width:63.8pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  38.09
  </td>
<td style="width:70.9pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  16.66
  </td>
<td style="width:4.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  2.21
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.15pt">
<td style="width:3.0cm;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-top:none;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  Oat Grain
  </td>
<td style="width:70.9pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  89.89
  </td>
<td style="width:70.85pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  28.69
  </td>
<td style="width:63.8pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  13.79
  </td>
<td style="width:70.9pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  11.06
  </td>
<td style="width:4.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  2.72
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:14.15pt">
<td style="width:3.0cm;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-top:none;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  Diet 
  </td>
<td style="width:70.9pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  91.37
  </td>
<td style="width:70.85pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  39.01
  </td>
<td style="width:63.8pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  25.94
  </td>
<td style="width:70.9pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  13.86
  </td>
<td style="width:4.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:14.15pt">
  2.50
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:15.5pt">
<td style="width:474.9pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;   border-top:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:15.5pt" colspan="6">
  MD: Dry Matter, NDF: Neutral detergent fiber,
  ADF: Acid detergent fiber, CP: Crude Protein, (Mcal/kg
  DM) Mega Calories per kilogram of DM.
  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p>
<bold> Ruminal fluid collection (RF).</bold> On each incubation day, the collection of RF was carried out in the morning, in preprandial conditions. Two liters were collected during the three incubation days. The RF was filtered with a double-layer cotton cloth and kept in thermoses, which were kept in a container with water at 39ºC, with the purpose of maintaining a stable temperature in order to be taken to the laboratory and to carry out the inoculation. </p>
<p>
<bold> Experimental design.</bold> This study was repeated measures with a single factor having five levels, where Linamarin (purity ≥98%; Sigma-Aldrich Chemical, Darmstadt, Germany, Cat. No. 68264-50 mg) was tested in five different dosages (0, 6.0, 13.0, 20.0, and 26.0 mg/L). Each dose represented a treatment. In each treatment, a RF sample was supplemented with the respective Linamarin dose and <italic>in vitro</italic> incubated in 5 test tubes (repetitions), measuring CH<sub>4</sub> concentration hourly, during 8 hours of incubation. This protocol was repeated in three consecutive days.  </p>
<p>
<bold> Inoculation.</bold> The in vitro technique described by Theodorou et al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref14">14</xref>) was used. Twenty-five 100 mL test tubes with a rubber stopper and Bunsen valve were used. The FS, consisting of 0.5 g of alfalfa hay and 0.5 g of 1 mm-ground oat grain, was put into each tube in a Wiley mill. Each test tube was added with RF 30 mL and buffer solution 40 mL. The buffer solution composition was: 238 mL macromineral solution (5.7 g Na<sub>2</sub>HPO<sub>4</sub> + 6.2 KH<sub>2</sub>PO<sub>4</sub> + 0.6g MgSO*7H<sub>2</sub>O + distilled water 1 L) plus 238 mL phosphate buffer solution (35 g NaHCO<sub>3</sub> + 4g NH<sub>4</sub>HCO<sub>3</sub> + distilled water 1 L, pH 7.0) in 1 L distilled water (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref15">15</xref>). </p>
<p>
<bold> Incubation.</bold> The tubes were placed on test tube racks and put into a thermoregulated chamber (Memmert 854, Germany) at 39ºC for a period of eight consecutive hours. The temperature was constantly monitored, and the tubes underwent rotary motion. </p>
<p>
<bold> CH<sub>4</sub> measurements.</bold> This procedure was carried out every hour during a period of eight consecutive hours, using an RKI Eagle 2 gas monitor (RKI instruments, California, USA). This monitor is a high-precision instrument, using a thermal conductivity (infrared) sensor, capable of detecting CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations within a range of 0 to 50.000 ppm.  </p>
<p>
<bold> Statistical analysis. </bold>Data were analyzed by means analysis of variance, using Statgraphics 5.0 software. These were normally distributed, no differences were obtained when compared data between days of incubation, then data from different incubation days were analyzed together. The data were analyzed by time, treatment and the interaction time vs treatment when it was relevant. The differences among groups were analyzed using the Tukey test. Differences were considered when p≤0.05. Data are presented as group average±SEM. Additionality polynomial contrasts were performed to determine linear or quadratic effects.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>
<bold>RESULTS</bold>
</title>
<p>Reduction of CH<sub>4</sub> concentration. <xref ref-type="table" rid="gt2">Table 2</xref>
shows the general averages of CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations, according to each Linamarin dose, the linear and quadratic effect, as well as
the significance of the treatments, time of fermentation and the interaction
time vs treatment.</p>
<p>
<table-wrap id="gt2">
<label>Table 2</label>
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Table 2.</bold> Mean
concentration values of CH<italic>4</italic> at increasing doses of Linamarin in ruminal fermentation<italic>
in vitro.</italic>
</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Table 2 Table 2. Mean
concentration values of CH4 at increasing doses of Linamarin in ruminal fermentation
in vitro.</alt-text>
<alternatives>
<graphic xlink:href="69360322010_gt3.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
<table style="margin-left:.4pt;border-collapse:collapse;" id="gt3-526564616c7963">
<tbody>
<tr style="height:11.3pt">
<td style="width:99.25pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-bottom:   solid windowtext 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.3pt"/>
<td style="width:382.7pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;   border-left:none;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:11.3pt;text-align:center;" colspan="5">
<bold>
  Treatment (LIN
  concentration mg/L)
  </bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:11.3pt">
<td style="width:99.25pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-top:none;         padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.3pt"/>
<td style="width:63.8pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.3pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>0
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.3pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  6
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:77.95pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:11.3pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  13  
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:70.85pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:11.3pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  20
  </bold>
</td>
<td style="width:4.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.3pt;text-align:center;">
<bold>
  26
  </bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:28.65pt">
<td style="width:99.25pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-top:none;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:28.65pt">
  CH4 (ppm)
  </td>
<td style="width:63.8pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:28.65pt">
  2738a
  </td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:28.65pt">
  2472a
  </td>
<td style="width:77.95pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:28.65pt">
  2485<sup>a
  </sup>
</td>
<td style="width:70.85pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:28.65pt">
  2243<sup>ab
  </sup>
</td>
<td style="width:4.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:28.65pt">
  1932<sup>b
  </sup>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:11.05pt">
<td style="width:99.25pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;   border-top:none;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:11.05pt" rowspan="2">
  SEM<sup>1
  </sup>
</td>
<td style="width:7.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:11.05pt;text-align:center;" colspan="3">
<bold>
  P<sup>2
  </sup>
</bold>
</td>
<td style="width:184.25pt;border-top:none;border-left:   none;border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;         padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.05pt;text-align:center;" colspan="2">
<bold>
  P<sup>3
  </sup>
</bold>
</td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:11.3pt">
<td style="width:63.8pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.3pt">
  T
  </td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.3pt">
  H
  </td>
<td style="width:77.95pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:11.3pt">
  T*H
  </td>
<td style="width:70.85pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:11.3pt">
  L
  </td>
<td style="width:4.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:11.3pt">
  Q
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:19.85pt">
<td style="width:99.25pt;border:solid black 1.0pt;border-top:none;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:19.85pt">
  154.2
  </td>
<td style="width:63.8pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:19.85pt">
  &lt;0.001
  </td>
<td style="width:2.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:19.85pt">
  &lt;0.001     
  </td>
<td style="width:77.95pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:19.85pt">
  &lt;0.001      
  </td>
<td style="width:70.85pt;border-top:none;border-left:none;   border-bottom:solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;   padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;   height:19.85pt">
  0.002
  </td>
<td style="width:4.0cm;border-top:none;border-left:none;border-bottom:   solid black 1.0pt;border-right:solid black 1.0pt;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:19.85pt">
  0.015
  </td>
</tr>
<tr style="height:35.65pt">
<td style="width:17.0cm;border:solid black 1.0pt;   border-top:none;      padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 0cm;height:35.65pt" colspan="6">
<sup>
  a, b</sup>
  Means with different letters are different (p≤0.05).
  <sup>1</sup>SEM, Standard error of the
  mean; <sup>2</sup>Probability of differences between treatments (T), sampling
  schedule (H) and interaction (T*H);<sup>3</sup>Probability linear (L) or
  quadratic (Q) to concentration of LIN.
  </td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</alternatives>
</table-wrap>
</p>
<p> The CH<sub>4</sub> reductions in relation to the doses (6, 13, 20, 26 mg/L) were 9.7, 9.2, 18.1 and 29.4%, respectively. When the CH4 concentration values were regressed in accordance with the treatments, a significant linear (p=0.002) and quadratic (p=0.015) effect was obtained in the reduction of CH<sub>4</sub> with increasing doses of Linamarin.  </p>
<p> The analysis of the data by incubation time shows a reduction (p≤0.05) in CH<sub>4</sub> concentration (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="gf1">Figure 1</xref>), where hours 1, 2 and 3 were the higher (p≤0.05), but similar among them.</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf1">
<label>Figure 1</label>
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Figure 1.</bold> Reduction of methane concentration
during eight hours of fermentation whit Linamarin.</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Figure 1 Figure 1. Reduction of methane concentration
during eight hours of fermentation whit Linamarin.</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="69360322010_gf2.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
</fig>
</p>
<p> A significant decrease begun at hour 4 of incubation, with a CH<sub>4</sub> concentration of 3.480  ±  20 ppm; this value was similar to that of hour 5. Low concentrations of CH<sub>4</sub> were obtained at hours 6 and 7 of incubation, with values of 1.218  ±  20 and 1.494  ±  20 ppm, respectively. Hour 8 was the lowest in CH<sub>4</sub> concentration with 840  ±  20 ppm.  When the CH<sub>4</sub> concentration values were regressed as a function of incubation time, a significant decreasing linear ratio was obtained (R<sup>2</sup>=0.843; p≤0.001). </p>
<p> An interaction between time of incubation and treatments was obtained (p≤0.005). The less value of CH<sub>4</sub> concentration was obtained with the higher dose of Linamarin at hour 1. At this time, CH<sub>4</sub> concentration increased while Linamarin dose decreased (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="gf2">Figure 2</xref>), showing a dose/response effect. However, after 2 hours of fermentation, a similar CH<sub>4</sub> reducing pattern throughout the rest of the fermentation time was observed.</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf2">
<label>Figure 2</label>
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Figure 2. </bold>Effect of five doses of Linamarin on the
production of CH<sub>4</sub>, during eight hours of<italic> in vitro</italic>
fermentation.</title>
</caption>
<alt-text>Figure 2 Figure 2. Effect of five doses of Linamarin on the
production of CH4, during eight hours of in vitro
fermentation.</alt-text>
<graphic xlink:href="69360322010_gf3.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait"/>
</fig>
</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>
<bold>DISCUSSION</bold>
</title>
<p> No studies regarding the use and dosage of pure Linamarin in the reduction of CH<sub>4</sub> were found in literature. As was previously mentioned, Linamarin is a PSM present in cassava. Concentrations of Linamarin in cassava fluctuate according to the variety, place, age of the plant, harvest time and how it is supplied in diets. In one reported analysis, 538.4  ±  4.91 mg of Linamarin were found in 100g DM cassava, while 102.3  ±  0.93 mg of Linamarin was obtained from 100 mL of aqueous mixture, therefore, it is important to consider the way in which cassava is offered, when a specific dose of Linamarin must be supplied (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref16">16</xref>). </p>
<p> The use of bitter varieties of cassava as a food additive has been demonstrated to reduce CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations. In this regard, Phuong et al. (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref11">11</xref>) obtained a 50 % CH<sub>4</sub> reduction in a 24 hours <italic>in vitro</italic> fermentation assay when included 2.16 g/DM of bitter cassava leaves. We have estimated the amount of Linamarin included in the previously described experiment, in accordance to Maherawati et al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref16">16</xref>), although these authors did not report the used cassava variety for the analysis. Thus, the inclusion of bitter cassava had an equivalent to 11.62 mg Linamarin. Then, the results of Phoung et al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref11">11</xref>) are similar to the results obtained in the present study, with the dose of 13 mg/L of pure Linamarin. Other results reported by Inthapaya and Preston (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref17">17</xref>), when they supplemented with 12 g/DM of cassava leaf flour, with an equivalent of 64 mg/Linamarin, obtaining the lowest CH<sub>4 </sub>values, with a reduction of 35.5% CH<sub>4</sub> at 24 hours of<italic> in vitro</italic> fermentation. These percentage of reduction is higher than the maximal reduction obtained in our study. However, the inclusion of Linamarin used by Inthapaya and Preston (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref17">17</xref>) was about 2 folds than the maximal dose used in our experiment, confirming the dose/response effect of the Linamarin on CH<sub>4</sub> reduction in <italic>in vitro</italic> ruminal fermentation. </p>
<p> The findings of this research show that the four Linamarin doses had a linear response in the reduction of CH<sub>4</sub> concentrations. This result is primarily related to the way in which Linamarin was used, since having ≥98% purity makes it highly available for rumen microorganisms. In this regard, when Do et al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref18">18</xref>) used cassava leaves as substrate, plus cassava root flour as an additive, equivalent to a 10.76 mg/Linamarin, they obtained CH<sub>4</sub> 32.2 mL/g of substrate, while when they did not include the additive, CH<sub>4</sub> 43.5 mL/g substrate was obtained. Furthermore, the addition of cassava root flour to the substrate lead to reduce total gas production from 237 mL to 197 mL. </p>
<p> The regression of the incubation time vs CH<sub>4</sub> concentration, show that the addition of Linamarin into the incubation with sheep RF, presents a trend to reduce CH<sub>4</sub> concentration. PSM have a period of action that could vary depending on the doses given, the diet of the animal (primarily) and the antimicrobial capacity, that leads to the reduction of protozoa and methanogenic bacteria, which as a result leads to a constant reduction of CH<sub>4 </sub>in a certain period (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref19">19</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref20">20</xref>).  </p>
<p> Previous studies have demonstrated that fermentation is influenced by the type of process in the substrates used as Linamarin source. In this regard, Inthapaya et al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref21">21</xref>) assessed the effects using fresh, ensiled, sun- or oven-dried cassava leaves on<italic> in vitro</italic> CH<sub>4</sub> production, observing that the CH<sub>4</sub> percentage was lower for fresh and ensiled leaves compared to sun- and oven-dried leaves, with values of 12, 11, 14 and 15% of CH<sub>4</sub>, respectively. The fresh leaves of cassava contain a greater amount of Linamarin, therefore the reduction of CH<sub>4</sub> is greater in comparison to dry leaves of cassava, which due to drying process, decreases the concentration of Linamarin (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref21">21</xref>). These results are in agreement with those of the present study, in which higher doses of Linamarin results in less CH<sub>4</sub> concentration. However, Inthapaya et al (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref21">21</xref>), also observed that as the fermentation time elapses, the total gas production increased, as well as the percentage of CH<sub>4</sub> from 11 to 16% from 12 to 24 hours of fermentation. It has been observed that in long fermentation times, the CH<sub>4</sub> reducing activity tends to decrease, probably due to a habituation of the microorganisms to the additive inclusion and/or to a reduction of the additive effectiveness (<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref22">22</xref>,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="redalyc_69360322010_ref23">23</xref>). </p>
<p> In conclusions this study demonstrates that the addition of Linamarin to the rumen fermentation substrate reduces CH<sub>4</sub> production in a dose-dependent manner. Also, the reducing action of the methanogenesis of Linamarin is dependent on the fermentation time. This study constitutes a basis for any future tests including vegetable sources of Linamarin as well as other rumen variables and longer <italic>in vitro</italic> fermentation times. </p>
<p>
<bold> Conflict of interests </bold>
</p>
<p> There is no conflict of interest.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ack>
<title>Acknowledgements</title>
<p>We thank the National Council of Science and Technology (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología - CONACYT,
Mexico) for the PhD scholarship and the National Institute of Forestry,
Agricultural and Livestock Research (Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales Agrícolas y Pecuarias - INIFAP, Mexico) for its assistance in
studying the doctorate outside the country or origin.</p>
</ack>
<ref-list>
<title>
<bold>REFERENCES</bold>
</title>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref1">
<label>1.</label>
<mixed-citation>1.     Bajželj B, Richards K, Allwood J, Smith P, Dennis J, Curmi E, Gilligan C. Importance of food-demand management for climate mitigation. Nature Climate Change. 2014; 4:924–929. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2353</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Richards</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Allwood</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Smith</surname>
<given-names>P</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dennis</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Curmi</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gilligan</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Importance of food-demand management
for climate mitigation. </article-title>
<source>Nature Climate Change.</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<fpage>924</fpage>
<lpage>929</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1038/nclimate2353</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref2">
<label>2.</label>
<mixed-citation>2.     Dangal S, Tian H, Zhang B, Pan S, Lu C, Yang J. Methane emission from global livestock sector during 1890–2014: Magnitude, trends and spatiotemporal patterns. Global Change Biol. 2017; 23(10):4147–4161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13709</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Dangal</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tian</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Zhang</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pan</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lu</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Yang</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Methane emission from
global livestock sector during 1890–2014: Magnitude, trends and spatiotemporal
patterns.</article-title>
<source>Global Change Biol.</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<issue>10</issue>
<fpage>4147</fpage>
<lpage>4161</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1111/gcb.13709</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref3">
<label>3.</label>
<mixed-citation>3.     Edenhofer O, Pichs R, Sokona Y, Kadner S, Minx J, Brunner S, Agrawala S, Baiocchi G, Bashmakov IA, Blanco G, et al. Technical Summary. Mitigation Climate Change Contribution Work. 2014; 33–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.70.106002</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Edenhofer</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pichs</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Sokona</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Kadner</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Minx</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Brunner</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Agrawala</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Baiocchi</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Bashmakov</surname>
<given-names>IA</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Blanco</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Technical Summary. </article-title>
<source>Mitigation Climate Change Contribution Work</source>
<year>2014</year>
<fpage>33</fpage>
<lpage>107</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1103/PhysRevD.70.106002</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref4">
<label>4.</label>
<mixed-citation>4.     Hristov A, Oh J, Lee C, Meinen R, Montes F, Ott T, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: a review of technical options for non-C02 emissions. FAO: ROMA; 2013. URL available in:  http://www.fao.org/3/i3288e/i3288e.pdf</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="webpage">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hristov</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Oh</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lee</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Meinen</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Montes</surname>
<given-names>F</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ott</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production: a
review of technical options for non-C02 emissions.</article-title>
<source>FAO: ROMA</source>
<year>2013</year>
<comment>http://www.fao.org/3/i3288e/i3288e.pdf</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref5">
<label>5.</label>
<mixed-citation>5.     Mottet A, Henderson B, Opio C, Falcucci A, Tempio G, Silvestri S, Chesterman S, Gerber PJ. Climate change mitigation and productivity gains in livestock supply chains: insights from regional case studies. Regional Environmental Change. 2017; 17(1):129–141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-0986-3</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Mottet</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Henderson</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Opio</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Falcucci</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Tempio</surname>
<given-names>G</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silvestri</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Chesterman</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Gerber</surname>
<given-names>PJ</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Climate change mitigation and
productivity gains in livestock supply chains: insights from regional case
studies.</article-title>
<source>Regional Environmental Change.</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>17</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>129</fpage>
<lpage>141</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/s10113-016-0986-3</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref6">
<label>6.</label>
<mixed-citation>6.     Patra A. Effects of essential oils on Rumen fermentation, microbial ecology and Ruminant production. Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances. 2011; 6:416–428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/ajava.2011.416.428</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Patra</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effects
of essential oils on Rumen fermentation, microbial ecology and Ruminant
production.</article-title>
<source>Asian Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances.</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<fpage>416</fpage>
<lpage>428</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/ajava.2011.416.428</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref7">
<label>7.</label>
<mixed-citation>7.     Kamra D,  Pawar M,  Singh B.  Effect of Plant Secondary Metabolites on Rumen Methanogens and Methane Emissions by Ruminants. Dietary Phytochemicals and Microbes. Springer, Dordrecht. 2012; 6:351-370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3926-0_12</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Kamra</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pawar</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Singh</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effect of Plant Secondary
Metabolites on Rumen Methanogens and Methane Emissions by Ruminants.</article-title>
<source>Dietary Phytochemicals and Microbes. Springer, Dordrecht.</source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<fpage>351</fpage>
<lpage>370</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1007/978-94-007-3926-0_12</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref8">
<label>8.</label>
<mixed-citation>8.     Günal M, Pinski B, AbuGhazaleh A. Evaluating the effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation under in vitro conditions. Ital J Anim Sci. 2017; 16(3):500–506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1291283</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Günal</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pinski</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>AbuGhazaleh</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>
Evaluating the effects of essential oils on methane production and fermentation
under in vitro conditions.</article-title>
<source>Ital J Anim Sci.</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>500</fpage>
<lpage>506</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1080/1828051X.2017.1291283</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref9">
<label>9.</label>
<mixed-citation>9.     Tekeli A, Yıldız G, Drochner W, Steingass H. Effects of essence oil additives added to different feeds on methane production Efectos sobre la producción de metano de los aceites esencias añadiendo diferentes aditivos. Rev MVZ Cordoba. 2017; 22(2):5854–5866. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.1023</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Tekeli</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Drochner</surname>
<given-names>W</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Steingass</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effects of essence oil additives added to
different feeds on methane production Efectos sobre la producción de metano de los aceites esencias añadiendo diferentes aditivos. R</article-title>
<source>Rev MVZ Cordoba.</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>22</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>5854</fpage>
<lpage>5866</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21897/rmvz.1023</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref10">
<label>10.</label>
<mixed-citation>10.    Gomaa R, González M, Arredondo J, Castelán O, Molina L. Effect of tanniferous plants on in vitro digestion and methane production. Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios. 2017; 4:371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19136/era.a4n11.1160</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Gomaa</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>González</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Arredondo</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Castelán</surname>
<given-names>O</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Molina</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effect of tanniferous plants on in vitro digestion and methane
production.</article-title>
<source>Ecosistemas y Recursos Agropecuarios.</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>4</volume>
<fpage>371</fpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.19136/era.a4n11.1160</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref11">
<label>11.</label>
<mixed-citation>11.    Phuong L, Khang D. Preston T. Methane production in an in vitro fermentation of cassava pulp with urea was reduced by supplementation with leaves from bitter, as opposed to sweet, varieties of cassava. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2015; 27(8):162 URL Available in: http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd27/8/phuo27162.html</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phuong</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khang</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title> Methane production in an in vitro fermentation of cassava pulp with
urea was reduced by supplementation with leaves from bitter, as opposed to
sweet, varieties of cassava</article-title>
<source>Livest Res Rural Dev.</source>
<year>2015</year>
<volume>27</volume>
<issue>8</issue>
<fpage>162</fpage>
<comment>http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd27/8/phuo27162.html</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref12">
<label>12.</label>
<mixed-citation>12.    Sornyotha S, Lay K, Ratanakhanokchai K. Purification and detection of linamarin from cassava root cortex by high performance liquid chromatography. Food Chemistry. 2007; 104:1750-1754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.071</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Sornyotha</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Lay</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Ratanakhanokchai</surname>
<given-names>K</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Purification and detection of linamarin from cassava root cortex by high performance
liquid chromatography. </article-title>
<source>Food Chemistry.</source>
<year>2006</year>
<volume>104</volume>
<fpage>1750</fpage>
<lpage>1754</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.10.071</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref13">
<label>13.</label>
<mixed-citation>13.    Phongphanith S, Preston T, Leng R. Effect of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) and cassava leaf meal (Manihot esculenta Crantz) with or without biochar on methane production in an in vitro rumen incubation using ensiled or dried cassava root meal as source of carbohydrate. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2016; 28:72. URL Available in: http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd28/5/phon28072.html</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Phongphanith</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preston</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leng</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title> Effect of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) and cassava leaf meal (Manihot esculenta Crantz) with or
without biochar on methane production in an in vitro
rumen incubation using ensiled or dried cassava root meal as source of
carbohydrate.</article-title>
<source>Livest Res Rural Dev.</source>
<year>2016</year>
<volume>28</volume>
<fpage>72</fpage>
<comment>http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd28/5/phon28072.html</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref14">
<label>14.</label>
<mixed-citation>14.    Theodorou M, Williams B, Dhanoa M, McAllan A, France J. A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1994; 48(3-4):185–197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Theodorou</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Williams</surname>
<given-names>B</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Dhanoa</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>McAllan</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>France</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title> A simple gas production method using a pressure
transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds.</article-title>
<source>Anim Feed Sci Technol.</source>
<year>1994</year>
<volume>48</volume>
<issue>3-4</issue>
<fpage>185</fpage>
<lpage>197</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref15">
<label>15.</label>
<mixed-citation>15.    Camacho L, Silva T, Palma M, Assunção A, Rodriguez L, Costa L, Detmann E. Evaluation of buffer solutions and urea addition for estimating the in vitro digestibility of feeds. J Anim Sci. 2019; 97(2):922-931.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/sky464</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Camacho</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Silva</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Palma</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Assunção</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Rodriguez</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Costa</surname>
<given-names>L</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Detmann</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Evaluation of buffer solutions and urea addition for estimating the in vitro
digestibility of feeds. </article-title>
<source>J Anim Sci.</source>
<year>2019</year>
<volume>97</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>922</fpage>
<lpage>931</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1093/jas/sky464</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref16">
<label>16.</label>
<mixed-citation>16.    Maherawati C, Nur M, Pranoto Y, Utami T. Effect of Cellulase Addition on Linamarin Hydrolysis in Cassava (Manihot esculenta) Slurry. Pak J Nutr. 2017; 16(12):914-920. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2017.914.920</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Maherawati</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nur</surname>
<given-names>M</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Pranoto</surname>
<given-names>Y</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Utami</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title> Effect of Cellulase
Addition on Linamarin Hydrolysis in Cassava (Manihot esculenta) Slurry.</article-title>
<source>Pak J Nutr.</source>
<year>2017</year>
<volume>16</volume>
<issue>12</issue>
<fpage>914</fpage>
<lpage>920</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.3923/pjn.2017.914.920</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref17">
<label>17</label>
<mixed-citation>17     Inthapaya S, and Preston T. Methane production from urea-treated rice straw is reduced when the protein supplement is cassava leaf meal or fish meal compared with water spinach meal in a rumen in vitro fermentation. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2014; 26(9):159. URL Available in: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/9/sang26159.html</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Inthapaya</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preston</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Methane production from
urea-treated rice straw is reduced when the protein supplement is cassava leaf
meal or fish meal compared with water spinach meal in a
rumen in vitro fermentation.</article-title>
<source>Livest Res Rural Dev.</source>
<year>2014</year>
<volume>26</volume>
<issue>9</issue>
<comment>http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd26/9/sang26159.html</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref18">
<label>18.</label>
<mixed-citation>18.    Do H, Khoa T, Hao T, Preston T. Methane production in an in vitro rumen incubation is lower for leaves with low compared with high protein solubility. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2013; 25(7):134. URL Available in: http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd25/7/hqdo25134.htm</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Do</surname>
<given-names>H</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Khoa</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Hao</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preston</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title> Methane production in an
in vitro rumen incubation is lower for leaves with low compared with
high protein solubility. </article-title>
<source>Livest Res Rural Dev.</source>
<year>2013</year>
<volume>25</volume>
<issue>7</issue>
<fpage>134</fpage>
<comment>http://lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd25/7/hqdo25134.htm</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref19">
<label>19.</label>
<mixed-citation>19.    Hassan A. A review of secondary metabolites from plant materials for post harvest storage. Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol. 2011; 6(2):94–102. URL Available in: http://ijopaasat.in/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/3_IJPAST-168-V6N2.57221749.pdf</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Hassan</surname>
<given-names>A</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>A review of
secondary metabolites from plant materials for post harvest
storage. </article-title>
<source>Int J Pure Appl Sci Technol</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>6</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>94</fpage>
<lpage>102</lpage>
<comment>http://ijopaasat.in/yahoo_site_admin/assets/docs/3_IJPAST-168-V6N2.57221749.pdf</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref20">
<label>20.</label>
<mixed-citation>20.    Vetter J. Plant cyanogenic glycosides. Toxicon. 2000; 38(1):11–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0041-0101(99)00128-2</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Vetter</surname>
<given-names>J</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Plant cyanogenic
glycosides.</article-title>
<source>Toxicon.</source>
<year>2000</year>
<volume>38</volume>
<issue>1</issue>
<fpage>11</fpage>
<lpage>36</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1016/s0041-0101(99)00128-2</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref21">
<label>21.</label>
<mixed-citation>21.    Inthapanya S, Preston T, Nguyen D, Leng R. Effect of method of processing of cassava leaves on protein solubility and methane production in an in vitro incubation using cassava root as source of energy. Livest Res Rural Dev. 2012; 24(2):36. URL Available in: https://www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd24/2/sang24036.htm</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Inthapanya</surname>
<given-names>S</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preston</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Nguyen</surname>
<given-names>D</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leng</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effect of method of
processing of cassava leaves on protein solubility and methane production in an
in vitro incubation using cassava root as source of energy.</article-title>
<source>Livest Res Rural Dev.</source>
<year>2012</year>
<volume>24</volume>
<issue>2</issue>
<fpage>36</fpage>
<comment>https://www.lrrd.cipav.org.co/lrrd24/2/sang24036.htm</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref22">
<label>22.</label>
<mixed-citation>22.    Lascano C, Cárdenas E. Alternatives for methane emission mitigation in livestock systems. R. Bras. Zootec. 2010;(39)175-182. URL Available in: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1516-35982010001300020</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Lascano</surname>
<given-names>C</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Cárdenas</surname>
<given-names>E</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Alternatives for methane emission mitigation in livestock systems.</article-title>
<source>R. Bras. Zootec.</source>
<year>2010</year>
<issue>39</issue>
<fpage>175</fpage>
<lpage>182</lpage>
<pub-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1590/S1516-35982010001300020</pub-id>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_69360322010_ref23">
<label>23.</label>
<mixed-citation>23.    Thanh V, Preston T, Leng R. Effect on methane production of supplementing a basal substrate of molasses and cassava leaf meal with mangosteen peel (Garcinia mangostana) and urea or nitrate in an in vitro incubation. Livest Res Rural Dev 2011; 23(4):98. URL Available in: http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/than23098.htm</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<person-group person-group-type="author">
<name>
<surname>Thanh</surname>
<given-names>V</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Preston</surname>
<given-names>T</given-names>
</name>
<name>
<surname>Leng</surname>
<given-names>R</given-names>
</name>
</person-group>
<article-title>Effect on methane production of
supplementing a basal substrate of molasses and cassava leaf meal with mangosteen peel (Garcinia mangostana) and urea or nitrate in an in vitro incubation.</article-title>
<source>Livest Res Rural Dev</source>
<year>2011</year>
<volume>23</volume>
<issue>4</issue>
<comment>http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd23/4/than23098.htm</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>