Abstract: Myeloid sarcoma (extramedullary myeloblastoma, granulocytic sarcoma, chloroma) is an extramedullary isolated malignant tumor of myeloblasts and immature myelocytes. It can occur anywhere in the body as a solitary tumor or can be accompanied with acute myeloid leukemia. We are presenting a case of a young male patient that presented with sings of a small bowel obstruction and a palpable tumor mass in the abdomen. After uneventful postoperative period, the immunohistochemistry analysis reported an extramedullary myeloid sarcoma since a normal bone marrow biopsy was revealed.
Keywords: Primary myeloid sarcoma, small bowel obstruction.
Clinical Practice
Primary Myeloid Sarcoma of the Ileum and Mesentery Causing Small Bowel Obstruction: Case Report and Literature Review

Recepción: 02 Marzo 2020
Aprobación: 14 Abril 2020
Myeloid sarcoma (extramedullary myeloblastoma, granulocytic sarcoma, chloroma) is an extramedullary isolated malignant tumor of myeloblasts and immature myelocytes [1]. It can occur anywhere in the body affecting only one or sometimes more than two different organs (skin, gastrointestinal system, lymph nodes, central nervous system, heart) [2–4]. The myeloid sarcoma (MS) is often accompanied (as a relapse) or followed by acute myeloid leukemia (AML). It can also precede other blood or bone marrow disease [5]. According to the 2008 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia, the MS is classified in the group of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia, subgroup of acute myeloid leukemia and related neoplasms [5].
MS occurs in patients with AML in 2–8% of cases [6]. Due to its low incidence, only small series and case reports are published. The age of the affected patients is variable due to the reported cases.
The clinical presentation of the extramedullary isolated tumor is dependent of its localization. The dominating clinical signs are associated with compressive effects, localized pain and bleeding. Therefore, contrast enhanced computer tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRi) are mostly used for the initial diagnosis [7].
The final diagnosis of MS is established with immunohistochemistry and immunophe-notyping [8].
Since there is a lack of a consensus for the treatment of MS, the proposed treatment whether for extramedullary MS or the one that is concomitant with AML is the standard AML-type chemotherapy, hematopoietic stem-cell transplanation and radiotherapy [8]. There are also reports for targeted therapy with new drugs such as: monoclonal antibody therapy with Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, Nucleoside analogues, demethyaltion agents and others [6, 9, 10].
If left untreated, the extramedullary MS almost always progresses to AML. The prognosis for this condition is variable but similar to that of AML [11].
In May 2018, a 22 years old male patient presented to our emergency department of surgery with clinical signs of intestinal obstruction accompanied with abdominal pain and vomiting. On a physical examination the abdomen was slightly distended and with palpable tumor in the right medial abdominal quadrant. The blood analysis showed normal leukocyte count of 7.0x10./l with differential count for Lymphocytes 24.2%, Monocytes 13.3% and Neutrophils 62.5%. Platelets count was 447x10./l, hemoglobin level of 158.0x10./l and CRP level of 4.4 mg/l.
The plain radiograph showed signs of small bowel obstruction (Figure 1).

A contrast enhanced CT scan was indicated due to the palpable abdominal tumor and it revealed a formation that originates from the ileal mesentery involving the ileocolic artery and a part of the ileum with ileal wall thickening and partial obstruction (Figures 2, 3 and 4).



A surgical exploration was indicated the same day. During surgery, the tumor affected part of the mesentery that contains the ileocolic artery but with no vascular changes of the terminal ileum and the right colon. It was also affecting a part of the ileum wall which explained the small bowel obstruction (Figure 5, 6).


Due to the normal finding of the right colon, extirpation of the whole tumor was not attempted and only a resection of the affected ileum was undertaken with a primary anastomosis creation. The patient had uneventful postoperative period and was discharged on postoperative day 6.
The macroscopic pathology analysis revealed hemorrhagic elevations of the ileal mucosa with infiltrating lesion of the intestinal wall and luminal stenosis in up to 90%. The same was spreading in the mesenteric fat. Microscopic view showed 4–5 mitoses on large microscopic field (Figure 7).

The immunohistochemistry analysis found high expression for Lysozime, LCA, CD117 and CD68 and partial expression for CD11c and bcl–2 (Figure 8).


During the immunohistochemistry analysis, the patient was sent to the University Clinic for Hematology where a bone marrow biopsy was done. It showed no signs of leukemic process and the diagnosis of extramedullary myeloid sarcoma was established.
In the same time period (one month after the surgery), the patient developed AML and was admitted to the University Clinic for Hematology. A standard induction regimen therapy (7+3) was conducted and afterwards allogenic bone marrow transplant was performed at the Clinic for Hematology. The recovery period were uneventful.
One year after the operation, a PET/ CT scan performed showed normal distribution of F-18 FDG and no signs of residual intraabdominal tumor (Figure 9). In the present period, the patient is disease free.
The extramedullary myeloid sarcoma with primary localization in the gastrointestinal system is rare and accounts with 6.5% of cases where the ileum is the most common site affected [12, 13]. The literature review reveals mostly single case reports [14–24]. Establishing its diagnosis is difficult. An isolated MS that can be misdiagnosed initially in up to 47% with some other hematologic malignancies, mostly malignant lymphoma [25]. The presence of MS with normal bone marrow finding has been reported in 30% of cases [26]. It certainly contributes for the diagnosis delay and postpones the beginning of the appropriate therapy. In our case the patient’s condition progressed to AML within a month after the surgery, although a previously done bone marrow biopsy was with normal finding.
The treatment for isolated MS or the one concomitant with AML includes a standard AML-type chemotherapy, since a higher rate of progression to AML in patients with isolated MS that have been treated with local excision only are reported [25, 27, 28].
Radiotherapy has been added in cases of MS previously treated with chemotherapy. Unfortunately no significant effect was found in matter of prolonged survival compared to those that were not radiated [8, 27, 29].
A few retrospective reports show the role of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Allogenic and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) was used in small groups of patients. In all the series, the groups of patients with any type of SCT reported significantly prolonged overall survival compared to those from non-SCT groups [6, 8].
Targeted therapy in its inception has been reported with various drugs such as Gemtuzumab ozogamicin, Imatinib mesylat, nucleoside analogues and demethyaltion agents [6, 9, 10, 30]. The reports are somewhere promising. Probably a model for identification of those patients that could have benefit is needed.
MS is related with uncertain prognosis and outcome. It is important to report and publish all newly diagnosed cases even as a case reports. It will lead, at least partially, to comprehend the clinical patterns of the extramedullary myeloid sarcoma. This could probably allow timely diagnosis and more efficient therapy for longer disease-free period and longer overall survival.








