<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><?xml-model type="application/xml-dtd" href="https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.3/JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" specific-use="Marcalyc 1.3" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en">
<front>
<journal-meta>
<journal-id journal-id-type="index">864</journal-id>
<journal-title-group>
<journal-title specific-use="original" xml:lang="es">RIA. Revista de Investigaciones Agropecuarias</journal-title>
<abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher" xml:lang="es">RIA, Rev. investig. agropecu.</abbrev-journal-title>
</journal-title-group>
<issn pub-type="ppub">0325-8718</issn>
<issn pub-type="epub">1669-2314</issn>
<publisher>
<publisher-name>Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria</publisher-name>
<publisher-loc>
<country>Argentina</country>
<email>ria@inta.gob.ar</email>
</publisher-loc>
</publisher>
</journal-meta>
<article-meta>
<article-id pub-id-type="art-access-id" specific-use="redalyc">86483126003</article-id>
<article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.58149/qgg7-yn33</article-id>
<article-categories>
<subj-group subj-group-type="heading">
<subject>Sin sección</subject>
</subj-group>
</article-categories>
<title-group>
<article-title xml:lang="en">Evaluating herbicide-resistant Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum germination and their response to safflower’s allelopathic effects</article-title>
</title-group>
<contrib-group>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Longás</surname>
<given-names>M.M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/>
<email>mmlongas@cerzos-conicet.edu.ar</email>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Carreño Salvador</surname>
<given-names>S.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Sabbatini</surname>
<given-names>M.R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff6"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff7"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Gigón</surname>
<given-names>R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff9"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Yanniccari</surname>
<given-names>M.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff11"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Franchini</surname>
<given-names>M.C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff13"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Flemmer</surname>
<given-names>A.C.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff15"/>
</contrib>
<contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no">
<name name-style="western">
<surname>Chantre</surname>
<given-names>G.R.</given-names>
</name>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff17"/>
<xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff18"/>
</contrib>
</contrib-group>
<aff id="aff1">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Departamento de Agronomía. San Andrés 800 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff2">
<institution content-type="original">Centro de Emprendedorismo y Desarrollo Territorial Sostenible (CEDETS), Centro asociado de la Universidad Provincial del Sudoeste (UPSO) y la Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas (CIC) de la Provincia de Buenos Aires (PBA). Ciudad de Cali 320 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Centro de Emprendedorismo y Desarrollo Territorial Sostenible (CEDETS)</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff4">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Departamento de Agronomía. San Andrés 800 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff6">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Departamento de Agronomía. San Andrés 800 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff7">
<institution content-type="original">Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS)-CONICET, Camino La Carrindanga, km 7 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS)-CONICET</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff9">
<institution content-type="original">Private Consultant in Weed Control, Tres Arroyos, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Private Consultant in Weed Control</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff11">
<institution content-type="original">Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow (MDA-INTA). CONICET, Universidad Nacional de La Pampa, Facultad de Agronomía. Coronel Gil Nº 353 (CP L6300DUG), Santa Rosa, La Pampa, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA)</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff13">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Departamento de Agronomía. San Andrés 800 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff15">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Departamento de Agronomía. San Andrés 800 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff17">
<institution content-type="original">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS), Departamento de Agronomía. San Andrés 800 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Universidad Nacional del Sur (UNS)</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<aff id="aff18">
<institution content-type="original">Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS)-CONICET, Camino La Carrindanga, km 7 (8000), Bahía Blanca, Argentina.</institution>
<country country="AR">Argentina</country>
<institution-wrap>
<institution content-type="orgname">Centro de Recursos Naturales Renovables de la Zona Semiárida (CERZOS)-CONICET</institution>
</institution-wrap>
</aff>
<pub-date pub-type="epub-ppub">
<season>September-December</season>
<year>2025</year>
</pub-date>
<volume>51</volume>
<issue>3</issue>
<fpage>140</fpage>
<lpage>151</lpage>
<permissions>
<ali:free_to_read/>
<license xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/">
<ali:license_ref>https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref>
<license-p>Esta obra está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional.</license-p>
</license>
</permissions>
<abstract xml:lang="en">
<title>Abstract</title>
<p>
<italic>Lolium perenne</italic> ssp. <italic>multiflorum</italic> (Lam) Husnot, commonly known as ryegrass, is a globally important weed with documented resistance to multiple herbicide modes of action. The germination and emergence responses of both susceptible and herbicide-resistant ryegrass phenotypes to environmental conditions may differ between them. To develop sustainable management strategies that reduce herbicide use, the inclusion of allelopathic crops such as <italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> (safflower) is promising. In the semi-arid temperate region of Argentina, specifically in the southwest of Buenos Aires Province, safflower is regarded as an alternative winter crop that is being cultivated for edible oil production. Therefore, understanding the effect of different safflower varieties on the morphophysiological seed traits of herbicide-resistant ryegrass phenotypes is crucial for optimizing management strategies. In this context, this study aims to: 1) evaluate the germination capacity of three ryegrass populations (<italic>L</italic>p)—a susceptible population (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>), a population resistant to both ALS and ACCase inhibitors (1LOLG<sub>2</sub>), and a population resistant to EPSPS, ALS, and ACCase inhibitors (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>)— under alternate temperature and water potential regimes in the laboratory, and 2) to assess the effect of allelopathic substances, remaining in the soil or in residual leaves, from five safflower genotypes (CW99 OL, RCJ3, WSRC01, Montola 2000, and RM NAPOSTÁ) on the germination and initial growth (coleoptile and radicle length) of <italic>L</italic>p. Seed weight differed among <italic>L</italic>p (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>&lt;1LOLG<sub>2</sub>&lt;1LOLG<sub>3</sub>; p&lt;0.01), while cumulative germination followed the opposite pattern (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>&gt;1LOLG<sub>2</sub>&gt;1LOLG<sub>3</sub>; p<italic>&lt;</italic>0.05). 1LOLG<sub>3 </sub>exhibited the highest hydrotime constant and the lowest minimum water potential for germination values (p<italic>&lt;</italic>0.05). The safflower genotypes differed in their allelopathic potential; CW99 OL leaves reduced germination by 20% in all <italic>L</italic>p. Conversely, Montola 2000 soil stimulated germination. Coleoptile length was mostly affected in the <italic>Lolium</italic> resistant populations, indicating significant allelopathic effects of Montola 2000, WSRC01, and RM NAPOSTÁ. These results suggest that safflower can negatively impact the establishment of herbicide-resistant ryegrass seedlings, that could be useful information to integrated management strategies.</p>
</abstract>
<trans-abstract xml:lang="es">
<title>Resumen</title>
<p>Lolium perenne ssp. multiflorum (Lam) Husnot, comúnmente conocido como raigrás, es una maleza de importancia mundial con resistencia documentada a múltiples modos de acción de herbicidas. Las respuestas de germinación y emergencia de los fenotipos de raigrás susceptibles y resistentes a herbicidas pueden diferir entre sí. Para desarrollar estrategias de manejo sostenibles que reduzcan el uso de fitosanitarios sintéticos, la inclusión de cultivos alelopáticos como Carthamus tinctorius (cártamo) es prometedora. En la región templada semiárida de Argentina, concretamente en el sudoeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires, el cártamo se considera un cultivo alternativo de invierno que se cultiva para la producción de aceite comestible. Por lo tanto, comprender el efecto de las diferentes variedades de cártamo sobre atributos morfofisiológicos de las semillas de los fenotipos de raigrás resistentes a herbicidas es fundamental para optimizar las estrategias de manejo. En este contexto, el objetivo de este estudio es: 1) evaluar la capacidad de germinación de tres poblaciones de raigrás (Lp) —una población susceptible (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>), una población resistente a los inhibidores de ALS y ACCasa (1LOLG<sub>2</sub>) y una población resistente a los inhibidores de EPSPS, ALS y ACCasa (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>)— bajo temperaturas alternas y un gradiente de potenciales hídricos en laboratorio, y 2) evaluar el efecto de las sustancias alelopáticas, que permanecen en el suelo o en las hojas, de cinco genotipos de cártamo (CW99 OL, RCJ3, WSRC01, Montola 2000 y RM NAPOSTÁ) sobre la germinación y el crecimiento inicial (coleóptilo y longitud de radícula) de Lp. El peso de las semillas difirió entre Lp (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>&lt;1LOLG<sub>2</sub>&lt;1LOLG<sub>3</sub>; p &lt; 0,01), mientras que la germinación acumulada siguió el patrón opuesto (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>&gt;1LOLG<sub>2</sub>&gt;1LOLG<sub>3</sub>; p &lt; 0,05). 1LOLG<sub>3</sub> exhibió la constante de hidro tiempo más alta y el menor potencial agua base medio (p &lt; 0,05). Los genotipos de cártamo difirieron en su potencial alelopático; las hojas de CW99 OL redujeron la germinación en un 20% en todos los Lp. Por el contrario, el suelo de Montola 2000 estimuló la germinación. La longitud del coleóptilo fue afectada principalmente en las poblaciones resistentes de Lolium, lo que indica efectos alelopáticos significativos de Montola 2000, WSRC01 y RM NAPOSTÁ. Estos resultados sugieren que el cártamo puede tener un impacto negativo en el establecimiento de plántulas de raigrás resistentes a herbicidas, lo que podría ser de utilidad al implementar estrategias de manejo integrado de malezas.</p>
</trans-abstract>
<kwd-group xml:lang="en">
<title>Keywords</title>
<kwd>ryegrass</kwd>
<kwd>
<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic>
</kwd>
<kwd>early growth</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<kwd-group xml:lang="es">
<title>Palabras clave</title>
<kwd>raigrás</kwd>
<kwd>Carthamus tinctorius</kwd>
<kwd>crecimiento inicial</kwd>
</kwd-group>
<counts>
<fig-count count="13"/>
<table-count count="0"/>
<equation-count count="0"/>
<ref-count count="34"/>
</counts>
<custom-meta-group>
<custom-meta>
<meta-name>redalyc-journal-id</meta-name>
<meta-value>864</meta-value>
</custom-meta>
</custom-meta-group>
</article-meta>
</front>
<body>
<sec sec-type="intro">
<title>
<bold> INTRODUCTION </bold>
</title>
<p>Chemical weed control is highly effective, but the excessive use of synthetic herbicides can negatively impact ecosystems and human health. In Argentina, the annual herbicide inputs per cropland area are notably high (Hulme, 2023), leading to significant herbicide contamination in rivers, streams, and drinking water (Aparicio and De Gerónimo, 2024; Mayora <italic>et al</italic>., 2024). Additionally, frequent and heavy herbicide use exerts selection pressure on weeds, resulting in the emergence of herbicide-resistant populations, including resistance to more than one herbicide with the same or different mechanisms of action (Chipomho <italic>et al</italic>., 2023).</p>
<p>Buenos Aires Province has the highest number of documented cases of herbicide resistance in Argentina, accounting for 35% of them, mainly in winter weeds, especially <italic>Lolium</italic> spp. populations (Oreja <italic>et al</italic>., 2024). In fact, <italic>Lolium</italic> genotypes in this region have shown resistance to multiple herbicide sites of action, including 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS; glyphosate), acetolactate synthase (ALS), and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCase) inhibitors (Vigna <italic>et al</italic>., 2013).</p>
<p>
<italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic>perenne</italic> ssp. <italic>multiflorum</italic> (Lam) Husnot is an important weed in cropping systems worldwide, particularly affecting winter crops (Matzrafi <italic>et al</italic>., 2020). It spreads mainly through seed production, with seeds exhibiting a partial physiological dormancy that breaks after a summer post-maturation period (Lodovichi and Yanniccari, 2018). The timing and number of seedling emergence are crucial for weed management, as they affect competition with crops. Emergence is influenced by dormancy, germination, coleoptile elongation, and environmental factors such as temperature and water availability (Forcella <italic>et al</italic>., 2000). Studies such as Vila-Aiub <italic>et al</italic>. (2005) on <italic>L. rigidum</italic> show that germination and emergence responses to environmental conditions differ between herbicide-susceptible and herbicide-resistant phenotypes. Understanding the morphophysiological characteristics of problematic weeds is essential for developing sustainable management strategies that minimize herbicide use.</p>
<p>In Integrated Weed Management (IWM), reducing herbicide use and employing a mix of preventive and control methods can help minimize environmental impacts. In this context, allelopathy is a promising approach (Scavo and Mauromicale, 2020). It can be applied through intercropping, crop rotation, mulching, or cover crops that negatively affect seed germination and plant growth (Khamare <italic>et al</italic>., 2022; Sobrero and Acciaresi, 2014). The effectiveness of allelopathy depends on factors such as the chemical properties of the allelochemicals, the organs that produce them and their route of release, the characteristics and phenological stage of the donor plant, environmental conditions such as soil moisture and temperature, and the phenological stage of the recipient species (Sobrero and Acciaresi, 2014; Zhang <italic>et al</italic>., 2021). Therefore, understanding both the donor and target species is crucial, as allelochemical release and susceptibility can vary within and between species.</p>
<p>Safflower (<italic>Carthamus</italic>
<italic> tinctorius</italic> L.) is an annual crop grown mainly for its high-quality edible and industrial oil. In southwestern Buenos Aires, its cultivation is under study due to its potential for growth in semi-arid conditions (Franchini <italic>et al</italic>., 2021). Laboratory studies have demonstrated that safflower residues inhibit radish seedling growth, including radicle and hypocotyl length, and seed germination (Motamedi <italic>et al</italic>., 2016). Motamedi <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) proposed that <italic>C. tinctorius</italic> could be incorporated as an allelopathic crop and a natural herbicide for weed management. However, the allelopathic effects of safflower genotypes have not yet been studied in Argentina. Therefore, this work aims to: 1) assess the germination capacity of multiple herbicide-resistant <italic>L. perenne</italic> ssp. <italic>multiflorum</italic> populations under different temperature and water potential conditions, and 2) evaluate the potential allelopathic effects of five safflower genotypes on the germination and initial growth of the above-mentioned populations.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="materials|methods">
<title>
<bold> MATERIALS AND METHODS </bold>
</title>
<p>
<italic>Lolium</italic> seed collection</p>
<p>Three populations of <italic>L. perenne</italic> ssp. <italic>multiflorum</italic> from the southwestern area of Buenos Aires Province, Argentina, were studied: one herbicide-susceptible (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>; 37°58′80″ S, 61°21′60″ W), one resistant to ALS and ACCase inhibitors (1LOLG<sub>2</sub>; 38°43′20″ S, 61°18′00″ W), and one resistant to EPSPS, ALS, and ACCase inhibitors (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>; 38°43′20″ S, 61°18′00″ W). Seeds were collected in December 2022, air-dried at room temperature, and stored in paper bags under lab conditions (16–22°C, 20–35% RH) until use in July 2023.</p>
<p>In two simultaneous experiments, the germination capacity of <italic>Lolium</italic> populations (<italic>L</italic>p) was assessed. Two months later, a third experiment investigated the allelopathic effects of safflower. All experiments were conducted in 2023 at the Weed Laboratory of the Agronomy Department, Universidad Nacional del Sur, Argentina.</p>
<p>To determine the 1000 seed weight (<italic>W<sub>1000</sub>
</italic>), eight replicates of 100 randomly selected seeds from each <italic>L</italic>p were weighed.</p>
<p>Germination experiment</p>
<p>For each trial and experimental treatment, four replicates of 30 seeds from each <italic>L</italic>p were placed in 9 cm diameter Petri dishes sealed with parafilm. Each dish was considered an experimental unit (EU) and incubated in a corresponding chamber at a 12-hour alternating temperature cycle with a 12-hour photoperiod (150 µmol m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>) in a completely randomized design. Seeds were scored daily for germination, using radicle protrusion as the evaluation criterion. At the end of the germination tests, non-germinated seeds that were rotten or empty were considered dead. The viability of non-germinated seeds was assessed by the crush test (Borza <italic>et al</italic>., 2007), and all viable but non-germinated seeds were classified as dormant (Maity <italic>et al</italic>., 2021). All evaluated parameters were calculated on the basis of viable seeds.</p>
<p>Cumulative germination was fitted to the logistic model described in Equation 1.</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf1">
<caption>
<title>Equation 1</title>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf2.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>Where <italic>G </italic>indicates the cumulative germination over time <italic>x</italic>, <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> is the maximum germination (%), <italic>G<sub>0</sub>
</italic> Is the initial germination, and <italic>k </italic>is the rate constant.</p>
<p>The germination rate (<italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic>) was also estimated, calculated as the inverse of the time required to reach 50% germination (1/t<sub>50</sub>; Bradford, 1990). Germination dynamics were evaluated using the Piper index (PI), defined as the number of days required for a seed to germinate (Petcu <italic>et al</italic>., 2017), and by comparison with the parameter <italic>k</italic> of equation 1.</p>
<p>Two simultaneous experiments were conducted in July 2023, following an after-ripening period. Experiment 1 evaluated the germinability of <italic>L</italic>p under a thermal gradient, while Experiment 2 assessed it under a water potential gradient.</p>
<p>
<bold>Experiment</bold>
<bold> 1:</bold> In each UE, seeds were sown on two layers of Whatman No. 1 filter paper, moistened with 7 ml of distilled water, and placed in a germination chamber with a night/day temperature of 5/15, 10/20, 15/25, 20/30, or 25/35°C and a day/night cycle of 12/12 h for 15 days (N = 60).</p>
<p>The comparison of <italic>L</italic>p was conducted using a thermal time model (García-Huidobro <italic>et al</italic>., 1982). Given the temperatures used in the experiment and the broad thermal window for <italic>Lolium</italic> seed germination, the analysis focused only on the suboptimal temperature range as defined by the following equation:</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf2">
<caption>
<title>model, <italic>θ<sub>(</sub>
</italic>
<italic>
<sub>g</sub>
</italic>
</title>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf3.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>In this model, <italic>θ<sub>(g)</sub>
</italic> represents the suboptimal thermal time required for germination of a fraction <italic>g </italic>of the population; <italic>T</italic> is the incubation temperature; <italic>T<sub>b</sub>​</italic> is the base temperature below which germination does not occur; and <italic>t<sub>g</sub>
</italic> is the time to germination in days for fraction <italic>g</italic>. The model assumes <italic>θ<sub>(g)</sub>
</italic> follows a normal distribution with a mean of <italic>θ</italic>
<sub>(</sub>
<sub>50)</sub> and a standard deviation of <italic>σ<sub>(θ)</sub>
</italic>. Initially, <italic>T<sub>b</sub>
</italic> was determined and found to be consistent across <italic>L</italic>p (p=0.59), so the average value was used for parameter calculations (<italic>T<sub>b</sub>
</italic>= 7.85°C). The average temperature value of each incubation regime was used.</p>
<p>
<bold>Experiment</bold>
<bold> 2: </bold>A water potential regime was simulated by applying 7 ml of polyethylene glycol solution (PEG 6000, Sigma-Aldrich), prepared according to Michel and Kaufmann, (1973), to Petri dishes lined with two layers of Whatman No. 1 filter paper. The treatments included osmotic potential (Ψ) of -0.2; -0.4; -0.8 y -1.2 MPa, using distilled water as control, <italic>i.e.</italic>, Ψ=0 (N = 60: 5 Ψ * 3 <italic>L</italic>p * 4 replicates). Seeds in PEG solutions were transferred to fresh solutions after the first 24 h and then weekly thereafter (Ni and Bradford, 1992). Petri dishes were kept in a germinator at 10/20°C for 15 days.</p>
<p>To analyze <italic>L</italic>p seed germination responses to various Ψ values, a probit procedure described by Bradford, (1990) was employed. This method is based on three parameters: the hydrotime constant (<italic>θ<sub>H</sub>
</italic>) the base or minimum water potential for germination (<italic>Ψ<sub>b</sub>
</italic>) and the standard deviation of the base water potential within the seed population (<italic>σ<sub>Ψb</sub>
</italic>). The base water potential for germination (<italic>Ψ<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, MPa) was estimated according to Equation 3:</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf3">
<caption>
<title>Equation 3</title>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf4.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>Where Ψ represents the water potential of the PEG solution, <italic>θ<sub>H</sub>
</italic> is the hydrotime constant, and <italic>t<sub>g</sub>
</italic> is the time to radicle emergence for germination percentage <italic>g.</italic> To determine the optimal value of <italic>θ<sub>H</sub>
</italic> from all germination percentage data across all Ψs values, a single linear regression was performed (Bradford, 1990):</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf4">
<caption>
<title>probit</title>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf5.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>The relationship between <italic>g </italic>and <italic>t<sub>g</sub>
</italic> at any constant Ψ was analyzed using this probit transformation of <italic>g</italic>. For each constant Ψ Probit (<italic>g</italic>) was plotted against <italic>Ψ</italic>(<italic>θ<sub>H</sub>
</italic>
<italic>/t<sub>g</sub>
</italic>) using various values of <italic>θ<sub>H</sub>
</italic> until the best fit or minimal residual was achieved. The standard deviation in base water potential within the seed population (<italic>σΨ<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, MPa) is the inverse of the slope obtained from this plot.</p>
<p>
<bold>Experiment</bold>
<bold> 3: </bold>Allelopathy test</p>
<p>Five safflower plant genotypes (CW99 OL, RCJ3, WSRC01, Montola 2000 and RM NAPOSTÁ) were evaluated as donor plants. The accessions were grown at the Napostá Experimental Field, Buenos Aires, Argentina (38°25´30” S, 62°17’15” W) in April 2022. The soil was a Typic Haplustoll with a fine loamy texture, 3.98% organic matter, 0.18% total nitrogen and 15.2 ppm extractable phosphorus. Seeds were sown by hand at a depth of 3.5 cm. Plants were grown under rainfed conditions, and weeds and insects were controlled. A block design was followed (b=3), where each experimental unit measured 1 m * 2.8 m (N=15). Plant samples were harvested manually at maturity in January 2023. Soil samples were taken from a depth of up to 10 cm between plant rows in the center of each plot, while senescent steam leaves were collected randomly. All materials were air-dried at room temperature and stored in paper bags until use. For comparison, a control soil sample (sC) was taken from a natural field adjacent to the experimental area.</p>
<p>In October 2023, ten treatments were carried out in the laboratory to evaluate the potential effect of allelopathic substances remaining in the soil or in residual leaves from the crop according to Zhang <italic>et al</italic>. (2021). Each Petri dish was filled with 31.8 cm<sup>3</sup> of sieved soil from plots corresponding to sCW99 OL, sRCJ3, sWSRC01, sMontola 2000, sRM NAPOSTÁ or sC; or with 0.55 g of leaf residues (Motamedi <italic>et al</italic>., 2016) from genotypes lCW99 OL, lRCJ3, lWSRC01, lMontola 2000 and lRM NAPOSTÁ on sC. Each dish was soaked with 12 ml of water and then incubated at 20/30°C for ten days.</p>
<p>The allelopathic effects on each <italic>L</italic>p were studied in terms of germination, coleoptile length, radicle length, and seedling vigor index (<italic>VI</italic>) according to Mirmostafaee <italic>et al</italic>. (2020). Ryegrass sown in sC was used as the control. For the determination of radicle and coleoptile length, five 72 h-germinated seedlings were taken from each replicate. These seedlings were photographed and measured using Image J software.</p>
<p>Seedling <italic>VI</italic> was calculated according to germination percentage and seedling length:</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf5">
<caption>
<title>
<italic>VI</italic>
</title>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf6.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>where <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> is the maximum germination achieved (%), <italic>R</italic> is radicle length (cm), and <italic>C</italic> is coleoptile length (cm). These traits were also reported relative to the control.</p>
<p>In parallel, the variables measured in the sC treatment were compared to assess possible morphological differences among <italic>L</italic>p.</p>
<p>Statistical analysis</p>
<p>Logistic equations and <italic>k</italic>-comparisons using an extra-square F-test were performed using GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 software. The measured data and estimated parameters were analyzed and processed using Infostat® statistic software. In Experiments 1 and 2, each population was compared by one-way ANOVA, and means were separated using LSD multiple comparison test (α = 5%). Firstly, a two-way ANOVA was performed in Experiment 3 to determine the effect of <italic>L</italic>p and safflower plant genotypes on germination and seedling parameters. Then, a one-way ANOVA was performed, partitioned by <italic>L</italic>p. <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> values were arcsine square root transformed to meet the assumptions of ANOVA.</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="results">
<title>
<bold> RESULTS </bold>
</title>
<p>Seed weight</p>
<p>The <italic>W<sub>100</sub>
</italic>
<sub>0</sub> varied according to the population: 1LOLG<sub>1</sub>: 1,96<sup>a</sup> g &lt; 1LOLG<sub>2</sub>: 2,18<sup>b </sup>g &lt; 1LOLG<sub>3</sub>: 2,49<sup>c </sup>g (p&lt;0.01).</p>
<p>
<bold>Experiment</bold>
<bold> 1: </bold>Effects of temperature on <italic>L</italic>p germination</p>
<p>Since dormancy occurs under suboptimal environmental conditions (Bradford, 1990), germination among <italic>L</italic>p was compared for each temperature condition, even though there was no interaction between the evaluated variables (p=0.36). The three <italic>L</italic>p expressed the highest germination percentages at 20/30°C, with no difference in <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> and <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> among them (p&gt;0.05, table 1; fig. 1). Under the remaining tested alternating temperatures, <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> was highest for 1LOLG<sub>1</sub> and lowest for 1LOLG<sub>3</sub>, with 1LOLG<sub>2</sub> showing intermediate values (p&lt;0.05, table 1; fig. 1). A similar trend was observed for <italic>GR<sub>50 </sub>
</italic>with no differences in PI (p&lt;0.05 and p&gt;0.05 for <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> and PI respectively). The germination dynamics of the three <italic>L</italic>p tended to accelerate with increasing temperature (higher <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic>). The mean time for a seed to germinate was 3.33 days at 25/35°C and 20/30°C, 4.6 days at 15/25°C and 10/20°C, and 7.8 days at 5/15°C (p&lt;0.01). Only at 5/15°C, 1LOLG<sub>1</sub> presented a steeper slope (p=0.03).</p>
<p>Results indicate a common mean baseline temperature of 5.4⁰C among populations (p&gt;0.05, table 2). <italic>θ<sub>(</sub>
</italic>
<italic>
<sub>50)</sub>
</italic> values obtained from all the evaluated temperature regimes increased with the resistance level, with 1LOLG<sub>3</sub> being significantly higher than the other two populations (p&lt;0.01; table 2).</p>
<p>
<bold>Experiment</bold>
<bold> 2: </bold>Effects of osmotic potentials on<italic> Lp </italic>germination</p>
<p>All <italic>L</italic>p exhibited similar germination behavior when subjected to osmotic potentials ranging from 0 to -0.4 MPa, but germination decreased to 50% and 10% at -0.8 and -1.2 MPa, respectively (fig. 2; p&lt;0.01). Between 0 to -0.4 MPa, 1LOLG<sub>3</sub> showed the lowest <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> and <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> values, while 1LOLG<sub>1</sub> presented the highest <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> and <italic>k</italic> (table 3, fig. 2a-c; p&lt;0.05). The mean germination time was 4.5 days between 0 and -0.4 MPa, 6.2 days at -0.8 MPa, and 7.6 days at -1.2 MPa (p&lt;0.01) for all <italic>L</italic>p.</p>
<p>The <italic>θ<sub>(H)</sub>
</italic> value remained constant across <italic>L</italic>p (<italic>p</italic>= 0.67), but 1LOLG<sub>3</sub> exhibited a lower <italic>Ψ<sub>b</sub>
</italic> (p=0.03) and higher <italic>σ<sub>Ψb</sub>
</italic> values (p=0.04; table 4).</p>
<p>
<bold>Experiment</bold>
<bold> 3:</bold> Allelopathy test</p>
<p>In Exp. 3. no changes in the PI of ryegrass germination were observed (p&gt;0.05) and the cumulative germination of <italic>L</italic>p followed the same pattern as observed in Experiment 1 and 2 (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>&gt;1LOLG<sub>2</sub>&gt;1LOLG<sub>3</sub>; p=0.01). Although the interaction between safflower plant accessions and <italic>L</italic>p was not significant (p=0.18), the LSD test showed that safflower genotypes affected germination differently among <italic>L</italic>p. In 1LOLG<sub>1</sub>, senescent steam leaves from CW99 OL, Montola 2000 and RM NAPOSTÁ reduced germination by up to 15% and increased<italic> GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> values in five days, compared to the control (p&lt;0.05; fig. 3A). Germination of 1LOLG<sub>2</sub> was inhibited by 20% by lCW99 OL treatment, but stimulated by sMontola 2000 and sRM NAPOSTÁ, reaching 100% (p&lt;0.01; fig. 3B). Finally, in 1LOLG<sub>3</sub>, lCW99 OL reduced germination by 20% and delayed <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> (p&lt;0.05), while sMontola 2000 stimulated both parameters (p&lt;0.05; fig. 4C).</p>
<p>There were no significant differences in the length of the <italic>L</italic>p coleoptile or radicle. Safflower varieties had no effect on coleoptile length in 1LOLG<sub>1</sub>, but Montola 2000, WSRC01 and RM NAPOSTÁ reduced coleoptile length by 50-60% in 1LOLG<sub>2</sub> and 1LOLG<sub>3</sub> (fig. 4A). Effects on radicle length were variable: lMontola 2000 and lWSRC01 treatments reduced radicle length by 50% in 1LOLG<sub>1</sub>. In 1LOLG<sub>2</sub>, lCW99 OL increased radicle length by 25%, while lRM NAPOSTÁ decreased it by 15%. In 1LOLG<sub>3</sub>, lRCJ3 and sCW99 OL stimulated radicle length by about 30% (p&lt;0.05; fig. 4B).</p>
<p>Finally, vigor index was reduced in 1LOLG<sub>1</sub> by lMontola 2000 and lWSRC01 treatments. In 1LOLG<sub>2</sub>, <italic>VI</italic> was reduced by sCW99 OL, sRCJ3, lMontola 2000, s-lWSRC01 and s-lRM NAPOSTÁ treatments. In 1LOLG<sub>3</sub>, <italic>VI</italic> was reduced by the lCW99 OL, lMontola 2000 and lRM NAPOSTÁ and by both WSRC01 treatments (p&lt;0.05; fig. 4C).</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf6">
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Table 1.</bold>
</title>
<p>The estimated of the mean and standard errors for germination parameters of <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne </italic>ssp.<italic> multiflorum</italic> populations. 1LOLG<sub>1</sub>: an herbicide-susceptible, 1LOLG<sub>2</sub>: acetolactate synthase (ALS) and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCAsa) inhibitors-resistant and a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS; glyphosate), ALS- and ACCAsa inhibitors-resistant (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>) at a range of alternate temperatures (5/15, 10/20, 15/25, 20/30 and 25/35°C). <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> represents the maximum germination achieved, the <italic>GR<sub>50 </sub>
</italic>indicates the germination rate, calculated as the inverse of the time required to reach 50% germination and <italic>k</italic> is the logistic model rate constant. On each row, <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> and <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> are compared between <italic>L</italic>p by LSD multiple range test and <italic>k </italic>by extra sum-of-squarer F test, identical letters are not significantly different at p&gt;0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf7.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf7">
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Table 2. </bold>
</title>
<p>Estimated parameters of the suboptimal thermal time model (standard errors in brackets) describing seed germination of <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne </italic>ssp. <italic>multiflorum</italic> population. 1LOLG<sub>1</sub>: an herbicide-susceptible, 1LOLG<sub>2</sub>: acetolactate synthase (ALS) and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCAsa) inhibitors-resistant and a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS; glyphosate), ALS- and ACCAsa inhibitors-resistant (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>) at a range of alternate temperatures (5/15, 10/20, 15/25, 20/30 and 25/35°C). θ(50) and σ(θ50) are the mean and standard deviation, respectively, of the normal distribution of the suboptimal thermal time. <italic>T<sub>b</sub>
</italic> is the base temperature and RMSE is the root mean square error (goodness of fit). On each column, identical letters are not significantly different at p&gt;0.05 by LSD multiple range test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf8.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf8">
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Table 3.</bold>
</title>
<p>The estimated mean and standard error for germination parameters of <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne </italic>ssp.<italic> multiflorum</italic> populations. 1LOLG<sub>1</sub>: an herbicide-susceptible, 1LOLG<sub>2</sub>: acetolactate synthase (ALS) and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCAsa) inhibitors-resistant and a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS; glyphosate), ALS- and ACCAsa inhibitors-resistant (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>) under an osmotic potential gradient (Ψ= 0; -0.2; -0.4; -0.8 and -1.2 MPa). On each row, <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> represents the maximum germination achieved, the <italic>GR<sub>50 </sub>
</italic>indicates the germination rate, calculated as the inverse of the time required to reach 50% germination and <italic>k</italic> is the logistic model rate constant. <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> and <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> are compared between <italic>L</italic>p by LSD multiple range test and <italic>k </italic>by extra sum-of-squarer F test, identical letters are not significantly different at p&gt;0.05.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf9.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf9">
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Table 4.</bold>
</title>
<p>Estimated hydrotime model parameters (standard errors in brackets) describing seed germination of <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne </italic>ssp.<italic> multiflorum</italic> populations: A herbicide-susceptible (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>), an acetolactate synthase (ALS) and acetyl coenzyme-A carboxylase (ACCAsa) inhibitor-resistant (1LOLG<sub>2</sub>), and a 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS; glyphosate), ALS- and ACCAsa inhibitors-resistant (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>) at a range of water potentials (0, -0.2, -0.4, -0.8 and -1.2 MPa). <italic>θ<sub>(H)</sub>
</italic> is the hydrotime constant; <italic>ψ<sub>b50</sub>
</italic> is the median base water potential; <italic>σ<sub>ψb</sub>
</italic> is the standard deviation in base water potential and R<sup>2 </sup>is the coefficient of determination of the regression of probit germination against base water potential. On each column, identical letters are not significantly different at p&gt;0.05 by LSD multiple range test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf10.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
</sec>
<sec sec-type="discussion">
<title>
<bold> DISCUSSION </bold>
</title>
<p>The heaviest 1LOLG<sub>3 </sub>seed result is consistent with previous studies that have shown a positive correlation between <italic>L. perenne</italic> seed weight and survival to multiple herbicides and individually to pinoxaden (ACCAsa-inhibitor) or glyphosate (EPSPS-inhibitor; Maity <italic>et al</italic>., 2021). However, more research is needed to determine whether seed weight is directly related to herbicide resistance or other factor as  environmental conditions during fruit set or resource availability (Lacey <italic>et al</italic>., 1997; Wulff <italic>et al</italic>., 1986).</p>
<p>This work shows that the optimal fluctuating temperature for germination of all <italic>L</italic>p was 20/30°C (fig. 1D), similar to that observed by Javaid <italic>et al</italic>. (2022), which indicated that 25°C yields the highest germination percentages in <italic>L. perenne</italic>. Variations in germination among <italic>L</italic>p were observed under suboptimal temperatures (fig. 1A-C), in agreement with Vila-Aiub <italic>et al</italic>. (2005) for <italic>L. rigidum</italic>, where ACCase-resistant populations exhibit deeper environmental dormancy (fig. 1-2). However, unlike Vila-Aiub <italic>et al</italic>. (2005) who attributed these differences to base temperature <italic>T<sub>b</sub>
</italic>, our results indicate that such differences are due to thermal time (<italic>θ<sub>50</sub>
</italic>), which increased with herbicide resistance (p&lt;0.01; table 2). The increment in thermal time indicates that more time is needed to complete germination under the same temperature conditions, explaining the higher<italic> GR<sub>50 observed in 1LOLG<sub>3</sub> (Bradford, 2002; fig. 1). These results could lead to different seedling emergence patterns compared to herbicide-sensitive individuals (Vila-Aiub <italic>et al</italic>., 2005). Phenotypes that require more thermal time to germinate, resulting in delayed seedling establishment, may be ecologically disadvantageous due to the importance of rapid seedling growth to capture light and avoid shading (Vila-Aiub <italic>et al</italic>., 2005). </sub>
</italic>
</p>
<p>Similar to exp. 1, 1LOLG<sub>3</sub> showed lower <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> and <italic>G<sub>max</sub>
</italic> values under optimal or moderate water stress conditions, probably related to the higher <italic>Ψ<sub>(b(50)</sub>
</italic> (p&lt;0.05, tables 3-4), which could be considered as an index of the mean dormancy status of the seed population (Chantre <italic>et al</italic>., 2010). Lower germination values at osmotic potentials below -0.4 MPa aligns with Javaid <italic>et al</italic>. (2022). Obtained high <italic>Ψ<sub>(b(50)  </sub>
</italic>values are associated with the tests being conducted during the peak emergence of <italic>Lolium</italic> in the field, as the seeds had already undergone a period of after-ripening being non-dormant (table 4). The dormancy release process exhibited a gradual decrease in <italic>Ψ<sub>(b(50)</sub>
</italic> values with increasing after-ripening time (Chantre <italic>et al</italic>., 2010).</p>
<p>The lack of differences in <italic>L</italic>p seedling dimensions (fig. 4), coupled with the fact that 1LOLG<sub>3</sub> presented the heaviest seeds but the lowest <italic>GR<sub>50</sub>
</italic> (fig. 1,2; as discussed below), suggests that the variation in germination among <italic>L</italic>p may be influenced by the thickness of the seed coat, which could hinder water absorption, contain germination inhibitors, or include polyphenols that induce hypoxia in the embryo (Brown, 1931). However, more studies are necessary to clarify such hypotesis. Given the critical importance of emergence timing for weed management, and the documented positive correlation between seed traits (such as seed weight and dormancy) and herbicide resistance, it is essential to investigate potential associations between seed morpho-physiological characteristics and herbicide resistance (Maity <italic>et al</italic>., 2021).</p>
<p>As observed by Motamedi <italic>et al</italic>. (2020) in radish seeds, different safflower genotypes exhibit varied allelopathic potential, resulting in different effects on <italic>L</italic>p. Germination was only reduced by leaf debris treatments, with the 1LOLG<sub>1</sub> population showing the greatest sensitivity to various safflower varieties. The lCW99 OL treatment reduced germination similarly in all <italic>L</italic>p, suggesting a common site of action. This is consistent with the evidence that <italic>L. rigidum</italic> germination is reduced by leaf extracts from different mature safflower cultivars (Nikneshan <italic>et al</italic>., 2011). Although a 20% reduction in germination may contribute to ryegrass management in the field, the inclusion of safflower under zero-tillage, intended to leave leaf stubble on the soil surface due to its apparent allelochemical properties, should be complemented with additional weed control strategies. Further bioassays with extracts are needed to investigate this effect, as new compounds with allelopathic properties are needed for the development of natural herbicides. Conversely, sMontola 2000 treatment stimulated the germination of 1LOLG<sub>2-3</sub>, but the fact that the control 1LOLG<sub>1</sub> germinated close to 100% did not allow us to corroborate whether germination of this population was stimulated by it (fig. 3). Tests with dormant seeds could elucidate this.</p>
<p>Several studies have found that safflower root exudates stimulate the germination of parasitic weed species, acting as a signal to indicate the presence of their host (Rial <italic>et al</italic>., 2020). This has led to the concept of ‘suicidal germination’, where a compound that induces parasitic seed germination is applied to soil. If the parasitic plant germinates without its host, it cannot complete its life cycle and dies, reducing the seed bank (Rial <italic>et al</italic>., 2020). However, no such effect has been reported in the literature for <italic>Lolium</italic>. Based on the results obtained here, it may be possible with further research to develop a formulation that stimulates<italic> Lolium </italic>germination for application in the field to synchronize emergence and reduce subsequent control efforts. If most seeds germinated in the first autumn cohort, the soil seed bank would be significantly reduced, leaving fewer seeds for future emergence. In an ideal scenario, control could be concentrated on a single date, with even pre-sowing mechanical tools used to manage resistant populations.</p>
<p>Coleoptile length was the most affected seedling parameter in 1LOLG<sub>2</sub> and 1LOLG<sub>3</sub>, consistent with the findings of Nikneshan <italic>et al</italic>. (2011) in <italic>L. rigidum</italic>. The lack of difference between leaf and soil treatments suggests that the effect may be due to a compound in the leaves that leaches into the soil, although further studies are needed to confirm this. Trials in which <italic>Lolium</italic> seedlings were watered with leaf extracts could assess potential growth reduction after post-emergence application. The small increase in radicle length observed in some cases (fig. 4) could be due to a hormesis effect.</p>
<p>The allelopathic potential of Montola 2000, WSRC01, and RM NAPOSTÁ cultivars on seedling growth was demonstrated. While the reduction in germination was not strong, the negative effect of safflower on ryegrass establishment, especially in 1LOLG<sub>3 </sub>(fig. 4C), is evident when both are considered in the VI index. This index takes into account reductions in both germination and seedling growth, which directly affect emergence timing and seedling competitiveness (Forcella <italic>et al</italic>., 2000). In the case of rainfall, late emergence would hinder competition with neighboring seedlings due to delayed germination and/or shorter coleoptile emergence, and especially if the radicle is smaller and less able to absorb nutrients. This allows a vigorous crop to outcompete the weeds.</p>
<p>As the germination behavior and emergence patterns of different populations of the same species are influenced by a wide range of internal and environmental factors, generalizations and predictions are difficult. However, it is important to understand the similarities and differences in early morpho-physiological characteristics of problematic populations within a region, particularly in the context of herbicide resistance. The results obtained should be validated under field conditions, so that the knowledge generated can contribute to optimizing management strategies and reducing dependence on agrochemicals.</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf10">
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Figure 1.</bold>
</title>
<p>Germination of <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne </italic>ssp.<italic> multiflorum </italic>populations under different alternating temperature regimes (Experiment 1). Susceptible to herbicides (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>; dotted line), resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCAsa) inhibitors (1LOLG<sub>2</sub>; dashed line) and resistant to a 5-enolpyruvylsikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) inhibitor (glyphosate), ALS and ACCAsa (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>; continuous line).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf11.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf11">
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Figure 2</bold>.</title>
<p>Germination of <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne </italic>ssp.<italic> multiflorum </italic>populations under an osmotic potential gradient (Experiment 2): susceptible to herbicides (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>; dotted line), resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCAsa) inhibitors (1LOLG<sub>2</sub>; dashed line) and resistant to a 5-enolpyruvylsikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) inhibitor (glyphosate), ALS and ACCAsa (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>; continuos line).</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf12.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf12">
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Figure 3.</bold>
</title>
<p>Germination of <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne </italic>ssp.<italic> Multiflorum </italic>populations under safflower plant accessions treatments: susceptible to herbicides (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>), resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCAsa) inhibitors (1LOLG<sub>2</sub>) and resistant to a 5-enolpyruvylsikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) inhibitor (glyphosate), ALS and ACCAsa (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>). Identical letters are not significantly different at p&gt;0.05 by LSD multiple range test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf13.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
<p>
<fig id="gf13">
<caption>
<title>
<bold>Figure 4.</bold>
</title>
<p>Characteristics of <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne </italic>ssp.<italic> multiflorum </italic>populations under treatments with safflower plant accessions: susceptible to herbicides (1LOLG<sub>1</sub>), resistant to acetolactate synthase (ALS) and acetyl coenzyme A carboxylase (ACCAsa) inhibitors (1LOLG<sub>2</sub>) and resistant to a 5-enolpyruvylsikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS) inhibitor (glyphosate), ALS and ACCAsa (1LOLG<sub>3</sub>). <bold>A.</bold> coleoptile length, <bold>B.</bold> radicle length and <bold>C.</bold> vigor index. Comparisons were among treatments within each <italic>L</italic>p, identical letters are not significantly different at p&gt;0.05 by LSD multiple range test.</p>
</caption>
<graphic xlink:href="86483126003_gf14.png" position="anchor" orientation="portrait">
<alt-text/>
</graphic>
</fig>
</p>
</sec>
<sec>
<title>
<bold> CONCLUSION </bold>
</title>
<p>The observed differences in seed dormancy associated with herbicide resistance play a key role in determining the timing of resistant seedling emergency. This has important implications for the development of targeted management strategies aimed at limiting the spread of resistant populations. The safflower genotypes differed in their allelopathic potential; CW99 OL leaves reduced germination by 20% in all <italic>L</italic>p. Conversely, Montola 2000 soil stimulated germination. Coleoptile length was mostly affected in the <italic>Lolium</italic> resistant populations, indicating significant allelopathic effects of Montola 2000, WSRC01, and RM NAPOSTÁ. These results suggest that safflower can negatively impact the establishment of herbicide-resistant ryegrass seedlings, that could be useful information to integrated management strategies.</p>
<p>The results presented here suggest new research avenues for the identification, isolation, and evaluation of allelochemicals through dose-response bioassays. This research trajectory could result in the development of eco-friendly bioherbicides with novel modes of action or compounds that stimulate seed germination. However, the efficacy of these substances on seeds with higher dormancy levels remains uncertain. Furthermore, the role of these substances as dormancy breakers or terminators, their residual activity in the soil, and the potential environmental side effects associated with high application rates require further investigation.</p>
</sec>
</body>
<back>
<ref-list>
<title>REFERENCES</title>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref1">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">APARICIO, V.; DE GERÓNIMO, E. 2024. Pesticide pollution in Argentine drinking water: A call to ensure safe access. Environmental Challenges, 14:100808, 1-10. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100808">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100808</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Pesticide pollution in Argentine drinking water: A call to ensure safe access.</article-title>
<source>Environmental Challenges, 14:100808, 1-10.</source>
<year>2024</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100808">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2023.100808</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref2">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">BORZA, J.K.; WESTERMAN, P.R.; LIEBMAN, M. 2007. Comparing estimates of seed viability in three foxtail (<italic>Setaria</italic>) species using the imbibed seed crush test with and without additional tetrazolium testing. Weed Technology, 21(2), 518-522. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-110">https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-110</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Comparing estimates of seed viability in three foxtail (<italic>Setaria</italic>) species using the imbibed seed crush test with and without additional tetrazolium testing.</article-title>
<source>Weed Technology, 21(2), 518-522.</source>
<year>2007</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-110">https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-110</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref3">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">BRADFORD, K.J. 1990. A water relations analysis of seed germination rates. Plant Physiology, 94(2), 840-849. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.840">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.840</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>A water relations analysis of seed germination rates.</article-title>
<source>Plant Physiology, 94(2), 840-849.</source>
<year>1990</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.840">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.94.2.840</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref4">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">BROWN, R. 1931. The absorption of water by seeds of<italic> Lolium perenne </italic>(L.) and certain other Gramineae. Annals of Applied Biology, 18(4), 559-573. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1931.tb02325.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1931.tb02325.x</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>The absorption of water by seeds of<italic> Lolium perenne </italic>(L.) and certain other Gramineae.</article-title>
<source>Annals of Applied Biology, 18(4), 559-573.</source>
<year>1931</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1931.tb02325.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7348.1931.tb02325.x</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref5">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">CHANTRE, G.R.; SABBATINI, M.R.; ORIOLI, G.A. 2010. An after‐ripening thermal‐time model for <italic>Lithospermum arvense</italic> seeds based on changes in population hydrotime parameters. Weed Research, 50(3), 218-227. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00770.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00770.x</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>An after‐ripening thermal‐time model for <italic>Lithospermum</italic>
<italic> arvense</italic> seeds based on changes in population hydrotime parameters.</article-title>
<source>Weed Research, 50(3), 218-227.</source>
<year>2010</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00770.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3180.2010.00770.x</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref6">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">CHIPOMHO, J.; PARWADA, C.; GWATIDZO, V.O. 2023. Evolution of Herbicide Resistant Weeds in Agro-ecological Systems. Advanced Chemicobiology Research, 138-150.<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37256/acbr.2220232376">https://doi.org/10.37256/acbr.2220232376</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Evolution of Herbicide Resistant Weeds in Agro-ecological Systems.</article-title>
<source>Advanced Chemicobiology Research, 138-150.</source>
<year>2023</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.37256/acbr.2220232376">https://doi.org/10.37256/acbr.2220232376</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref7">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">FERNÁNDEZ-MORENO, P.T.; ALCÁNTARA-DE LA CRUZ, R.; SMEDA, R.J.; DE PRADO, R. 2017. Differential resistance mechanisms to glyphosate result in fitness cost for <italic>Lolium perenne</italic> and <italic>L. multiflorum</italic>. Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, Article 1796. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01796">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01796</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Differential resistance mechanisms to glyphosate result in fitness cost for <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne</italic> and <italic>L. multiflorum</italic>.</article-title>
<source>Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, Article 1796.</source>
<year>2017</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01796">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01796</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref8">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">FORCELLA, F.; BENECH-ARNOLD, R.L.; SANCHEZ, R.; GHERSA, C.M. 2000. Modeling seedling emergence. Field Crops Research, 67(2), 123-139.<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00088-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00088-5</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Modeling seedling emergence.</article-title>
<source>Field Crops Research, 67(2), 123-139</source>
<year>2000</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00088-5">https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(00)00088-5</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref9">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">FRANCHINI, M.C.; FLEMMER, A.C.; LINDSTRÖM, L.I.; CARRIN, M.E.; CONSTENLA, D.; JOHNSON, R.C. 2021. How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables. Crop Science, 61, 2775-2786. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20548">https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20548</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>How sowing date affects development and performance of safflower through climate variables.</article-title>
<source>Crop Science, 61, 2775-2786.</source>
<year>2021</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20548">https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20548</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref10">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">GARCIA-HUIDOBRO, J.; MONTEITH, J.L.; SQUIRE, G.R. 1982. Time, temperature and germination of pearl millet (<italic>Pennisetum typhoides</italic> S. &amp; H.) i. Constant temperature. Journal of Experimental Botany, 33(2), 288-296.<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/33.2.288">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/33.2.288</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Time, temperature and germination of pearl millet (<italic>Pennisetum</italic>
<italic> typhoides</italic> S. &amp; H.) i. Constant temperature.</article-title>
<source>Journal of Experimental Botany, 33(2), 288-296.</source>
<year>1982</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/33.2.288">https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/33.2.288</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref11">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">HULME, P.E. 2023. Weed resistance to different herbicide modes of action is driven by agricultural intensification. Field Crops Research, 292:108819, 1-10. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108819">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108819</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Weed resistance to different herbicide modes of action is driven by agricultural intensification.</article-title>
<source>Field Crops Research, 292:108819, 1-10.</source>
<year>2023</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108819">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2023.108819</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref12">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">JAVAID, M.M.; MAHMOOD, A.; ALSHAYA, D.S.; ALKAHTANI, M.D.F; WAHEED, H.; WASAYA, A.; KHAN, S.A.; NAQVE, M.; HAIDER, I.; SHAHID, M.A.; NADEEM, M.A.; AZMAT, S.; KHAN, B.A.; BALAL, R.M.; ATTIA, K.A.; FIAZ, S. 2022. Influence of environmental factors on seed germination and seedling characteristics of perennial ryegrass (<italic>Lolium perenne</italic> L.). Scientific Reports, 12:1, 9522.<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13416-6">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13416-6</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Influence of environmental factors on seed germination and seedling characteristics of perennial ryegrass (<italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne</italic> L.).</article-title>
<source>Scientific Reports, 12:1, 9522</source>
<year>2022</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13416-6">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13416-6</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref13">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">KHAMARE, Y.; CHEN, J.; MARBLE, S.C. 2022. Allelopathy and its application as a weed management tool: A review. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13:1034649, 1-17. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1034649">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1034649</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Allelopathy and its application as a weed management tool: A review.</article-title>
<source>Frontiers in Plant Science, 13:1034649, 1-17.</source>
<year>2022</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1034649">https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1034649</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref14">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">LACEY, E.; SMITH, S.; CASE, A. 1997. Parental effects on seed mass: seed coat but not embryo/endosperm effects. American Journal of Botany, 84(11), 1617-1617. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2446624">https://doi.org/10.2307/2446624</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Parental effects on seed mass: seed coat but not embryo/endosperm effects.</article-title>
<source>American Journal of Botany, 84(11), 1617-1617.</source>
<year>1997</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2446624">https://doi.org/10.2307/2446624</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref15">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">LODOVICHI, M.V.; YANNICARI, M. 2018. <italic>Lolium perenne</italic> L. In: FERNÁNDEZ, O.; LEGUIZAMÓN, E.; ACCIARESI, A. (Eds.). Malezas e invasoras de la Argentina. Tomo III: historia y biología. 1.a ed. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional del Sur. Ediuns.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<source>1.a ed. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional del Sur. Ediuns.</source>
<year>2018</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref16">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MAITY, A.; SINGH, V.; JESSUP, R.; BAGAVATHIANNAN, M. 2021. Seed traits correlate with herbicide resistance in Italian ryegrass (<italic>Lolium perenne</italic> ssp. multiflorum). Pest Management Science, 77(6), 2756-2765. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/DOI">https://doi.org/DOI</ext-link> 10.1002/ps.6304</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Seed traits correlate with herbicide resistance in Italian ryegrass (<italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> perenne</italic> ssp. multiflorum).</article-title>
<source>Pest Management Science, 77(6), 2756-2765.</source>
<year>2021</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/DOI">https://doi.org/DOI</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref17">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MATZRAFI, M.; PRESTONB, C.; BRUNHAROC, C.A. 2020. Review: Evolutionary drivers of agricultural adaptation in <italic>Lolium</italic> spp. Pest Management Science, 77(5), 2209-2218. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6219">https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6219</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Review: Evolutionary drivers of agricultural adaptation in <italic>Lolium</italic> spp.</article-title>
<source>Pest Management Science, 77(5), 2209-2218.</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6219">https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.6219</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref18">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MAYORA, G.; SAGARDOY, M.E.; REPETTI, M.R.; PAIRA, A.; FRAU, D.; GUTIERREZ, M.F. 2024. Spatiotemporal patterns of multiple pesticide residues in central Argentina streams. Science of The Total Environment, 906:167014. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167014</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Spatiotemporal patterns of multiple pesticide residues in central Argentina streams.</article-title>
<source>Science of The Total Environment, 906:167014.</source>
<year>2024</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167014">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167014</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref19">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MICHEL, B.E.; KAUFMANN, M.R. 1973. The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000. Plant physiology, 51(5), 914-916. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org">https://doi.org</ext-link>/ 10.1104/pp.51.5.914</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>The osmotic potential of polyethylene glycol 6000.</article-title>
<source>Plant physiology, 51(5), 914-916.</source>
<year>1973</year>
<comment>https://doi.org/ 10.1104/pp.51.5.914</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref20">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MIRMOSTAFAEE, S.; AZIZI, M.; FUJII, Y. 2020. Study of allelopathic interaction of essential oils from medicinal and aromatic plants on seed germination and seedling growth of lettuce. Agronomy, 10(2), 163, 1-23. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org">https://doi.org</ext-link>/ 10.3390/agronomy10020163</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Study of allelopathic interaction of essential oils from medicinal and aromatic plants on seed germination and seedling growth of lettuce.</article-title>
<source>Agronomy, 10(2), 163, 1-23.</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>https://doi.org/ 10.3390/agronomy10020163</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref21">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MOTAMEDI, M.; KARIMMOJENI, H.; SINI, F.G. 2016. Evaluation of allelopathic potential of safflower genotypes (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> L.). Journal of Plant Protection Research, 56(4), 364-371. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0049">https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0049</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Evaluation of allelopathic potential of safflower genotypes (<italic>Carthamus</italic>
<italic> tinctorius</italic> L.).</article-title>
<source>Journal of Plant Protection Research, 56(4), 364-371.</source>
<year>2016</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0049">https://doi.org/10.1515/jppr-2016-0049</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref22">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">MOTAMEDI, M.; KARIMMOJENI, H.; SINI, F.G. 2020. Allelopathic effect of <italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic> on weeds and crops. Planta Daninha, 38, Article e020212334, 1-8. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100066">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100066</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Allelopathic effect of <italic>Carthamus</italic>
<italic> tinctorius</italic> on weeds and crops.</article-title>
<source>Planta Daninha, 38, Article e020212334, 1-8.</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100066">https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100066</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref23">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">NI, B.R.; BRADFORD, K.J. 1992. Quantitative models characterizing seed germination responses to abscisic acid and osmoticum. Plant Physiology, 98(3), 1057-1068. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.3.1057">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.3.1057</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Quantitative models characterizing seed germination responses to abscisic acid and osmoticum.</article-title>
<source>Plant Physiology, 98(3), 1057-1068.</source>
<year>1992</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.3.1057">https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.98.3.1057</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref24">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">NIKNESHAN, P.; KARIMMOJENI, H.; MOGHANIBASHI, M.; HOSSEINI, as N. 2011. Allelopathic potential of sunflower on weed management in safflower and wheat. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(11), 1434-1440.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Allelopathic potential of sunflower on weed management in safflower and wheat.</article-title>
<source>Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5(11), 1434-1440.</source>
<year>2011</year>
<comment>https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.742612364453786</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref26">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">OREJA, F.H.; MORENO, N.; GUNDEL, P.E.; VERCELLINO, R.B.; PANDOLFO, C.E.; PRESOTTO, A.; PEROTTI, V.; PERMINGUEAT, H.; TUESCA, D.; SCURSONI, J.A.; DELLAFERRERA, I.; CORTES, E.; YANNICCARI, M.; VILA‐AIUB, M. 2024. Herbicide‐resistant weeds from dryland agriculture in Argentina. Weed Research, 64(2), 89-106. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12613">https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12613</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Herbicide‐resistant weeds from dryland agriculture in Argentina.</article-title>
<source>Weed Research, 64(2), 89-106.</source>
<year>2024</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12613">https://doi.org/10.1111/wre.12613</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref27">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">PETCU, E.; BĂBEANU, N.; POPA, O. 2017. Screening methods for evaluating the allelopathic potential of wheat and triticale genotypes. Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, 60, 370-374.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Screening methods for evaluating the allelopathic potential of wheat and triticale genotypes.</article-title>
<source>Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy, 60, 370-374.</source>
<year>2017</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref28">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">RIAL, C.; TOMÉ, S.; VARELA, R.M.; MOLINILLO, J.M.; MACÍAS, F.A. 2020. Phytochemical study of safflower roots (<italic>Carthamus tinctorius</italic>) on the induction of parasitic plant germination and weed control. Journal of chemical ecology, 46(9), 871-880. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-020-01200-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-020-01200-7</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Phytochemical study of safflower roots (<italic>Carthamus</italic>
<italic> tinctorius</italic>) on the induction of parasitic plant germination and weed control.</article-title>
<source>Journal of chemical ecology, 46(9), 871-880.</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-020-01200-7">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-020-01200-7</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref29">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">SCAVO, A.; MAUROMICALE, G. 2020. Integrated weed management in herbaceous field crops. Agronomy, 10(4):466, 1-26. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040466">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040466</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Integrated weed management in herbaceous field crops.</article-title>
<source>Agronomy, 10(4):466, 1-26.</source>
<year>2020</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040466">https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040466</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref30">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">ŠERÁ, B. 2012. Effects of Soil Substrate Contaminated by Knotweed Leaves on Seed Development. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 21 (3), 713-717.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Effects of Soil Substrate Contaminated by Knotweed Leaves on Seed Development.</article-title>
<source>Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 21 (3), 713-717.</source>
<year>2012</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref31">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">SOBRERO, M.T.; ACCIARESI, H.A. 2014. Interferencia cultivo-maleza: la alelopatía y su potencialidad en el manejo de malezas. In: FERNÁNDEZ O.; LEGUIZAMÓN, E.; ACCIARESI, A. (Eds.). Malezas e invasoras de la Argentina, Tomo I: ecología y manejo. 1.a ed. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional del Sur. Ediuns.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<source>1.a ed. Editorial de la Universidad Nacional del Sur. Ediuns.</source>
<year>2014</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref32">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">VILA-AIUB, M.M.; NEVE, P.; STEADMAN, K.J.; POWLES, S.B. 2005. Ecological fitness of a multiple herbicide-resistant <italic>Lolium rigidum</italic> population: dynamics of seed germination and seedling emergence of resistant and susceptible phenotypes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(2), 288-298. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01017.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01017.x</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Ecological fitness of a multiple herbicide-resistant <italic>Lolium</italic>
<italic> rigidum</italic> population: dynamics of seed germination and seedling emergence of resistant and susceptible phenotypes.</article-title>
<source>Journal of Applied Ecology, 42(2), 288-298.</source>
<year>2005</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01017.x">https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2005.01017.x</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref33">
<mixed-citation publication-type="book">VIGNA, M.R.; LÓPEZ, R.; GIGÓN, R. 2013. Situación de la problemática y propuesta de manejo para <italic>Lolium</italic> y <italic>Avena fatua</italic> resistentes a herbicidas en el sur de Buenos Aires. In: RÍOS, A. (Ed.). Viabilidad del glifosato en sistemas productivos sustentables. Serie Técnica N.° 204, Hemisferio Sur S.R.L. 75-82 pp.</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="book">
<source>Serie Técnica N.° 204, Hemisferio Sur S.R.L. 75-82 pp.</source>
<year>2013</year>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref34">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">WOLF, L.L.; HAINSWORTH, F.R.; MERCIER, T.; BENJAMIN, R. 1986. Seed size variation and pollinator uncertainty in <italic>Ipomopsis aggregata </italic>(Polemoniaceae). The Journal of Ecology, 74, 361-371. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2260260">https://doi.org/10.2307/2260260</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Seed size variation and pollinator uncertainty in <italic>Ipomopsis</italic>
<italic> aggregata </italic>(Polemoniaceae).</article-title>
<source>The Journal of Ecology, 74, 361-371.</source>
<year>1986</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.2307/2260260">https://doi.org/10.2307/2260260</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
<ref id="redalyc_86483126003_ref35">
<mixed-citation publication-type="journal">ZHANG, Z.; LIU, Y.; YUAN, L.; WEBER, E.; VAN KLEUNEN, M. 2021. Effect of allelopathy on plant performance: A meta‐analysis. Ecology Letters, 24(2), 348-362. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13627">https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13627</ext-link>
</mixed-citation>
<element-citation publication-type="journal">
<article-title>Effect of allelopathy on plant performance: A meta‐analysis.</article-title>
<source>Ecology Letters, 24(2), 348-362.</source>
<year>2021</year>
<comment>
<ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13627">https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13627</ext-link>
</comment>
</element-citation>
</ref>
</ref-list>
</back>
</article>