{{t.titulosHerramientas.nube}}
{{t.titulosHerramientas.numeros}}
X
Abstract: Richard Albert’s groundbreaking book Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions surely provides the most extensive analysis of constitutional amendments rules ever published. Particularly relevant is that, unlike part of the const
en pt
Abstract: The concept of constitution substitution is a notion that has not been developed by constituent power, and in that measure, the Colombian Constitutional Court has established a precedent for the amendment process of the Legislative Act, which i
en pt
Abstract: This paper aims to rethink the idea of constitutional renewal through a dissection of Richard Albert’s ground-breaking concept of constitutional dismemberment. It is contended that under the rubric of constitutional dismemberment are two except
en pt
Abstract: Constitutional dismemberment is one of the main consequences attached to constitutional amendments that Albert’s book analyses. After having analyzed Albert’s definition, the present essay focuses on the practice of constitutional dismemberment
en pt
Abstract: One of the most spectacle features anchored in Richard Albert’s Constitutional Amendments: Making, Breaking, and Changing Constitutions is the theory of constitutional dismemberment. In his masterpiece, Albert proposes constitutional designers
en pt
Resumo: O artigo pretende apresentar soluções para a forma com que o Supremo Tribunal Federal pratica o consequencialismo, constituindo-se de uma pesquisa do tipo qualitativa, com objetivos descritivo-explicativos e propositivos, utilizando para tal o
pt en
Resumo: O presente artigo busca avaliar o impacto da Proposta de Emenda Constitucional 188/2019 no estado do Rio Grande do Sul. Parte-se da construção de o que é um estado federado, discorrendo, após, sobre a situação do município como membro da federa
pt en
Resumo: O presente artigo tem o objetivo de investigar como, no Supremo Tribunal Federal, o ministro relator tem se utilizado de seus poderes individuais para, de forma não autorizada pela Constituição, decidir monocraticamente medidas liminares, contr
pt en
|
||
---|---|---|
|

{{criterio.prioridadCriterio}}. {{criterio.observaciones}} | ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
{{criterio.prioridadCriterio}}. {{criterio.observaciones}} | ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
{{criterio.prioridadCriterio}}. {{criterio.observaciones}} | ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
{{criterio.prioridadCriterio}}. {{criterio.observaciones}} | ![]() |
![]() ![]() |
{{criterio.prioridadCriterio}}. {{criterio.observaciones}} | ![]() |
![]() ![]() |