Servicios
Servicios
Buscar
Idiomas
P. Completa
Transition or transitions? Analyzing the fertility decline in Brazilin the light of educational levels
Adriana de Miranda-Ribeiro; Ricardo Alexandrino Garcia
Adriana de Miranda-Ribeiro; Ricardo Alexandrino Garcia
Transition or transitions? Analyzing the fertility decline in Brazilin the light of educational levels
¿Transición o transiciones? Un análisis de la disminución de la fecundidad en Brasil según el nivel educativo
Revista Latinoamericana de Población, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 91-106, 2013
Asociación Latinoamericana de Población
resúmenes
secciones
referencias
imágenes

Abstract: In Brazil, the reproductive behavior is differentiated according to educational level. The main objective of this article is to analyze fertility differentials by educational level in order to seek characteristics that determine the particular stage of the demographic transition of each educational group. The study will focus on the analysis of fertility level (tfr), parity composition, mean age of childbearing and tempo effect (bf Model). Data come from the Brazilian Demographic Censuses (1980 to 2010). Brazil seems to be completing the (first) demographic transition: fertility is below the replacement level, the mac is starting to increase and the percentage of higher order births is decreasing. Because of the great social inequality, one can identify groups in distinct stages of the transition. Regarding fertility, highly educated women are facing the sdt, while the lesser educated are facing the ftd.

Keywords:fertility transitionfertility transition,fertility and educationfertility and education,tempo effecttempo effect,BrazilBrazil.

Resumen: El comportamiento reproductivo en Brasil difiere según el nivel educativo de las mujeres. El objetivo principal de este trabajo es analizar las diferencias de fecundidad según nivel de estudios de la mujer, buscando características que indiquen en qué etapa de la transición demográfica se encuentra cada grupo. Para ello, se estudió el nivel de fecundidad (tgf), la composición de la fecundidad por paridad, la edad media de la fecundidad y el efecto tiempo (Modelo bf), sobre la base de los microdatos de los censos de población desde 1980 hasta 2010. Los resultados indican que el país parece estar terminando la transición demográfica (primera): la fecundidad está por debajo del nivel de reemplazo, la edad media de la fecundidad está aumentando y el porcentaje de nacimientos de orden superior está disminuyendo. Sin embargo, debido a las diferencias socioeconómicas, es posible identificar grupos en diversas etapas de la transición: mientras que las mujeres con niveles más altos de educación están pasando por la std, aquellas con niveles de educación más bajos están pasando por la ptd.

Palabras clave: transición de la fecundidad, fecundidad y educación, efecto tiempo, Brasil.

Carátula del artículo

Artículo

Transition or transitions? Analyzing the fertility decline in Brazilin the light of educational levels

¿Transición o transiciones? Un análisis de la disminución de la fecundidad en Brasil según el nivel educativo

Adriana de Miranda-Ribeiro
Fundação João Pinheiro/mg, Brasil
Ricardo Alexandrino Garcia
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil
Revista Latinoamericana de Población, vol. 7, no. 13, pp. 91-106, 2013
Asociación Latinoamericana de Población
Introduction and objectives

In the first decade of this century, Brazil entered into the group of countries that had below replacement fertility. This occurred about 40 years after the onset of fertility transition in the country. The transition process began in the late 1960s, when the total fertility rate (tfr) was 5.8 children per woman. This transition accelerated during the 1980s, reaching an average of 2.4 children per woman by the end of the century. Data from the National Household Sample Survey (pnad) of 2006 showed that the tfr in the country had reached two children per woman. The following pnad confirmed this trend and, according to the 2010 Demographic Census, the tfr in Brazil was 1.9. The fertility decline in Brazil was accompanied by a fall in the mean age of childbearing (mac), suggesting a rejuvenation of the fertility schedule. The pnad of the second half of the 2000s and the 2010 Demographic Census both indicated that there was a reversal occurring and that the recent trend in the country is towards a rising mac.

The country’s average does not reflect the differences in the reproductive behavior of Brazilian women. Considering the example of the extremes in educational levels (women with less than eight years of schooling versus women with 12 or more years of study), one can observe that although the differentials decrease over time, they are still considerable. In 1980, the tfr for women with 12 or more years of schooling was 2.94 children, while the tfr for those with less than eight years of schooling was 4.46. In 2010, the tfr was 1.26 for the more educated women and 2.47 for the less educated women. In terms of the mac, there was a decrease among the less educated women between 1980 and 2010 from 29.0 to 25.3 years, while the mac for more educated women increased from 28.5 to 30.9 during the same period.

These results show that reproductive behavior in Brazil is differentiated according to educational level. The downward trend in fertility is common among all groups, but there are differences in the level, the pace of decline and in the mac behavior. In 2010, women with the lowest educational levels still present a tfr above the replacement level and a decrease in the mac, while women with highest educational levels present very low fertility levels and a rising mac.

According to this evidence, is it possible to say that Brazil is a country experiencing fertility transitions? We analyzed fertility through the lens of the educational level of women to investigate whether it is possible to identify more than one movement among Brazilian women. The main objective of this paper is to analyze fertility differentials by educational level in order to seek characteristics that determine the particular stage of the demographic transition of each educational group.

Demographic transitions: the role of fertility

The term “demographic transition” is widely used, although there is no consensus as to whether it consists of a single and continuous movement or several shifts. Whether the demographic transition affects all components or can be confused with the fertility transition is also debated. Even without a specific consensus, one could traditionally identify two movements and, more recently, a third movement attempts to explain the demographic changes that the world population is facing. Fertility played –and still plays– a very important role on demographic changes.

In the classical model of the demographic transition, also known as the First Demographic Transition (fdt), the initial balance in population growth is caused by high rates of mortality and fertility. After the drop in mortality, fertility decline leads population growth towards a new level of equilibrium. Although the real trigger for the fdt stemmed from a decrease in mortality, the developed theories about the phenomenon tried to understand the motivations and differences in the process of fertility decline. These issues have been extensively discussed by the so-called “classical theories” that address macro and micro-economic, social, ideological and behavioral aspects.

When mortality reached low levels, it was expected that fertility would stabilize close to the replacement level, thus maintaining population growth near zero, in the worst scenario. If this case had occurred, no new theory would probably exist, and discussions about fertility levels would be of little interest. However, in industrialized countries, the fertility decline has not ceased and instead of balance, what we saw –and continue to see– is a new imbalance caused by extremely low fertility levels, which have been active for over four decades. Regardless of the name given to this set of characteristics, the discussions brought to light a new set of ideas and revelations.

An article by Ron J. Lesthaeghe and Dirk J. Van de Kaa published in 1986, and cited by Van de Kaa (2002), marks the beginning of the studies on the Second Demographic Transition (sdt). According to Van de Kaa (2002), the basic idea behind the concept of the sdt is that industrialized countries have reached a new stage of demographic development, characterized by full fertility control. The absence of incentives for having more than one or two children, combined with the possibility of effective control against pregnancy, led to very low fertility levels. Obviously, the result of a long period following this scheme was the accentuation of the process of population aging and population decrease. In this new scenario, (international) migration works as a compensating factor.

Philip Ariès (1980) explained the fertility decline from the 1960s as a result of a behavior change towards the idea of children that suggests offspring were no longer the only alternative for personal fulfillment, but one option. In this sense, the significance of personal relationships has become the most important thing in people’s lives. This behavior and the desire for goods and status gave a special meaning to the rapid fertility decline. Henri Leridon (Leridon, 1987), quoted by Van de Kaa (2002), emphasized the importance of the “second contraceptives revolution,” created by the availability of new and more efficient contraceptive methods. This revolution, combined with the ability to obtain abortions in some societies, would have a catalytic effect on fertility decline (and on the number of unwanted pregnancies). This catalytic effect is contested by Ariès for whom, despite the existence of other factors, the most important change occurred internally, when each individual started to act according to the new paradigm. The studies conducted by Ariès were important to highlight that, behind the fertility decline, there was a fundamental factor: the changing patterns of family formation. His ideas were instrumental to the development of the theory of the sdt.

Some criticisms have arisen in regards to the term sdt. R. L. Cliquet (1991) argued that there is no apparent discontinuity between the fdt and the sdt and that the demographic changes can be seen as an acceleration of family formation reproductive patterns and can be related to modernization. David Coleman (2004) asserted the sharpest criticism. According to Coleman, a transition implies a permanent move and must be shared by most individuals in a population. In this sense, the sdt cannot be called a “transition.” Secondly, Coleman believes that some aspects listed as drivers of the sdt, including ideological change and individualization for example, are nothing more than a continuation of values established in the fdt. In this sense, the sdt cannot be called “second,” but secondary. Finally, Coleman thinks the term “demographic” is incorrect, since changes are more behavioral than demographical.

The most recent criticism, described by Tomáš Sobotka (2008), states that the sdt theory was developed from the point of view of European societies, which leaves much to the imagination in terms of whether it will spread to other countries and regions worldwide. Some studies indicate that advanced societies outside of Europe experienced a continuation of fertility decline and changing family formation patterns, with very different behaviors from those observed in Europe. In this regard, critics contend that the standard family, as opposed to what the sdt theory contemplates, is not unique. Rather, there is a plurality of patterns. Thus, a single model transition is unable to describe different types of change. Sobotka (2008) argues that the fluidity and breadth of the sdt narrative prevented studies that could cast doubt on the validity of the theory. Before this could happen, sdt was already an established concept.

Although (international) migration appears in the formulation of the sdt theory and in the integrated model proposed by Van de Kaa, it is not explicitly considered in an effective manner. In fact, the sdt’s emphasis is on changes in values and attitudes and the influence of these factors on continued fertility decline and the maintenance of this decline at levels below replacement. Migration is not considered in the way it was originally proposed, i.e., as an attempt to restore the population growth equilibrium. Coleman (2006) proposes that international migration flows observed in low and very low fertility countries, and the consequences of this migration, in terms of size and the ethnic composition of the population, are seen as a new transitional movement, or a “Third Demographic Transition” (tdt). According to Coleman (2006), the prerequisites for the tdt are the low and persistent fertility levels, associated with high international migration rates.

This combination results in a progressive increase of migrants and their descendants and the relative decline of the native population. The speed of the compositional change depends on the growth rates (i.e., fertility) of natives and migrants and the net migration in the country or region. According to Sobotka (2008), some studies show that in the case of European countries, although the fertility rates of immigrants are usually higher, the differential varies according to the origin and the effect on the local total fertility is relatively small.

Data and Methods

In this work, we will solely investigate fertility related aspects, without going into details on family formation patterns or migration analysis. The study will focus on the fertility level, parity composition and mean age of childbearing trends.

We used microdata from the 1980, 1991, 2000 and 2010 demographic censuses. The selected variables were age, parity, births in the previous year, women and years of schooling. These variables allowed the calculation of: total fertility rates (tfr), specific fertility rates (asfr) and mean age of childbearing (mac), according to the women’s educational level. We divided women into four educational categories: 0-7 years of schooling (0-7 yrsch), 8-10 years of schooling (8-10 yrsch), 11 years of study (11 yrsch) and 12 years of schooling or more (12+ yrsch). For a more detailed analysis, these measures were also calculated according to birth order (last birth).

The tfr and asfr were corrected by the P/F Brass method (Brass, 1975), which adjusts the fertility level by a “correction factor,” calculated as the ratio between parity and cumulative fertility for age group representing 20-24 years-of-age. In this paper, we applied the same correction factor to all educational levels (Brazil’s factor). Although it is likely that the percentage of correctness is smaller for the more educated women, the application of the same factor ensures that the number of births is equal, considering the total number of women or disaggregating by educational level.

To analyze the mac, we applied the Bongaarts and Feeney (bf) model (Bongaarts and Feeney, 1998). Despite criticism, the model generates a measure that provides information on the reproductive behavior of women in terms of advance births or postponement. We are not interested in the adjusted tfrper se, but in its comparison with the observed tfr. We want to know if there is a movement towards delaying or anticipating births.

bf model

In the bf model, the tempo effect is related to the distortions that the mac causes in the observed tfr. The bf model aims at establishing a new tfr, free of distortions caused by the tempo effect. This “adjusted” measure represents the tfr that would be observed in the absence of changes in the mac, i.e., in the absence of the tempo effect. The adjusted measure, tfradjusted, is what Bongaarts and Feeney (1998) define as the pure quantum.

The authors assume that fertility may be influenced by age, parity, period and duration since last birth, but not by cohort. One argument for developing the bf model is that fertility changes in a certain period can occur at any age or birth order and as a consequence of quantum or tempo effects. Thus, the disaggregated model works according to birth order, i, and uses an adaptation of the equation developed by Ryder (1956), to determine the Equation 1, that calculates the adjusted tfr:

TFR i , a = TFR i , a ( 1 r i ) [Equation 1]

in which tfrobserved is the observed tfr for order i, and riis the annual change in the mac at order i.

One can easily apply the bf model by using data from cross-sectional household surveys that allow the estimation of the tfr and asfr according to birth order. To estimate riit is necessary to use two editions of the survey, and the annual change in the mac is calculated by dividing the total change by the time elapsed between the editions. The ease of this application led to a series of studies in different countries and regions. However, the validity of tfradjusted as a measure of pure quantum, free from the tempo effect, is questionable.

The two main criticisms of the bf model refer to the fact that the authors disregard cohort differentials in the change of the mac and that they propose inadequate measures in the model (Van Imhoff and Keilman, 2000). The first criticism relates to the value of ri, which assumes that the annual change in mac for a particular birth order is the same for all age groups, i.e., that the fertility schedule was constant during the period. Evert Van Imhoff and Nico Keilman (2000), along with Hans-Peter Köhler and Dimiter Philipov (2001), showed empirically that this assumption is violated. The second criticism is related to the use of asfr that have a denominator containing all women at a particular age, regardless of their parity. Thus, fertility rates do not represent exposure or risk measures, but frequencies. When period frequencies are summed for all ages, the result cannot be interpreted as an appropriate quantum indicator (Van Imhoff and Keilman, 2000).

Some sociodemographic characteristics of the Brazilian population
Brazilian population: size, growth rates and age structure

In 2010, the Brazilian population was 190.7 million people. Although Brazilian fertility has been below the replacement level since the mid-2000s, the large percentage of reproductive age women and the fact that high fertility regimes occurred recently ensure a positive growth rate. Table 1 shows that the Brazilian population grew at an average annual rate of 1.9 percent between 1980 and 1991 and that in the following years the rate fell to 1.6 percent per year. In the first decade of the 2000s, the Brazilian population grew at an average rate of 1.2 percent per year. Some studies indicate that by 2030, Brazil will reach its maximum population of around 206 million people.

Table 1: Population, Growth Rate (%) and Total Dependency Ratio. Brazil. 1980 to 2010.

Table 1
Population, Growth Rate (%) and Total Dependency Ratio. Brazil. 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010

Figure 1 shows the Brazilian age structure according to the 1980, 1991, 2000 and 2010 Demographic Censuses. One can observe the drastic changes caused by rapid fertility decline. Despite swift changes in the age structure of Brazil, the situation is demographically favorable (demographic bonus) due to a low overall dependency ratio, which may reach its lowest value between 2020 and 2030.

Figure 1: Age structure. Brazil. 1980 to 2010.


Figure 1
Age structure. Brazil. 1980 to 2010.
Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 201

Educational system in Brazil

The Brazilian educational system has undergone many changes throughout the second half of the 20th century. A systematic increase in the schooling population occurred as the number of the locations of public schools increased, compulsory school attendance for the school-age population rose and the initial age of compulsory education was reduced. Despite advances, we are far from an ideal scenario. The average level of schooling of the population above 10 years-of-age in 2011 was 7.2 years. This number is still low when compared to educational attainment in developed countries (12.4 years in the U.S.; 10.6 years in France; 11.6 years in Japan) or even the level of schooling obtained in other Latin American countries such as Chile (9.7 years) and Argentina (9.3 years).1 This low educational attainment reflects limited access to education in the past –which implies adults with lower education– and unfavorable socioeconomic conditions –that cause high repetition and dropout rates.

The basic Brazilian educational system is divided into two mandatory levels: fundamental and secondary. Until the early 2000s, the fundamental level was comprised of eight years and the secondary level consisted of three years of schooling. Children entered school at age seven and would reach a total of 11 years of schooling if they completed basic education. Preschool was and is still not mandatory. The more recent difference is that since the mid-2000s, the fundamental level begins at age six and the complete basic system is comprised of 12 years of schooling.

Women who are of reproductive age in 2010 (should have) fulfilled their basic education under the old system, which motivated the definition of the schooling groups used in this paper: 0-7 years of schooling, which aggregates those who have not completed primary education; 8-10 years of schooling, which aggregates those who completed primary, but did not complete the secondary level; 11 years of schooling, which aggregates those who completed the secondary level and are not enrolled in college; 12 or more years of schooling, which aggregates women who at least entered college. Brazil’s average years of schooling in 2009 indicates that much of the population has not completed primary education.

Table 2 shows the percentage of reproductive age women by educational level from 1980 to 2010. Results indicate a decrease in the percentage of lower educated women and an increase in the percentage of women with 12 or more years of schooling.

Table 2: Reproductive age women (%) by years of schooling. Brazil. 1980 to 2010.

Table 2
Reproductive age women % by years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010.

Empirical evidences of the fertility transition in Brazil

Brazil has experienced a steady fertility decline during the last 50 years, despite a lack of socioeconomic and structural changes or any explicit family planning policies. Figure 2 shows that the decline began in the mid-1960s, accelerated during the 1980s and reached the replacement level in the early 2000s. In 2010, the Brazilian tfr was 1.91 children per woman.

Figure 2: Total fertility rate (TFR). Brazil. 1960 to 2010.


Figure 2
Total fertility rate TFR Brazil 1960 to 2010
Source: Own Children Method (1960-2000); PNAD (2006-2009); Brazilian Demographic Census 2010

Figure 3 shows the parity composition. Between 1980 and 2010 there was a considerable increase in the percentage of first and second order births. In 1980, the first two birth orders represented 49 percent of births, while 35.7 percent were births of order four or higher. In 1991, 60 percent of births were first or second order, while live births of order four or higher were reduced to 24.6 percent. In 2000, 16.3 percent of births were of superior orders, while almost 70 percent were of orders one or two. In 2010, one can observe that 45.1 percent were first order births, 30.1 percent were of second order and 11.1 percent were of order four or higher. The percentage of third order births remained constant over the period at approximately 15 percent.

Figure 3: Cumulative parity distribution by order. Brazil. 1980 to 2010.


Figure 3
Cumulative parity distribution by order Brazil 1980 to 2010
Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010

The analysis of the mac reveals that in the last decade there has been a reversal in the downward trend that was observed previously. Table 3 shows the mac and the mac by birth order from 1980 to 2010. The mac, which fell from 28.8 years-of-age to 26.3 years-of-age between 1980 and 2000, increased to 26.8 years-of-age in 2010. For the first birth order (mac 1), a similar phenomenon occurred, although the decline between 1980 and 2000 was lower and the increase between 2000 and 2010 was higher than the one observed for the overall mac. The decline in the mac in Brazil was mostly due to the decline of the fertility rates of higher order births observed during the period.

Table 3: Mean age of childbearing (MAC). total and by birth order. Brazil. 1980 to 2010

Table 3
Mean age of childbearing (MAC). total and by birth order. Brazil. 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses. 1980 to 2010

Table 4: Total fertility rate by years of schooling. Brazil. 1980 to 2010

Table 4
Total fertility rate by years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses. 1980 to 2010

Fertility transition in Brazil according to the educational level

Fertility levels observed in Brazil do not reflect the differentials between educational groups. Table 4 shows the tfr according to level of schooling from 1980 to 2010. In general, one can observe a decrease in the differentials over time. The largest decrease occurred between 1980 and 1991 for all schooling groups. By the end of the period, only the lesser-educated are above replacement level, and the higher educated are below 1.3 children per woman.

Figure 4 shows the parity composition according to the level of schooling. In general, one can observe an increase in the proportion of first and second order births although the increase is differentiated for the four educational groups. Furthermore, higher levels of schooling imply higher proportions of first and second order births. Among women with 0-7 yrsch, 23.6 percent of births in 1980 were of the first order and 40.7 percent were of order four or higher, showing that high-order births were quite frequent in this group. In 2010, they are still frequent: 22.8 percent of women with births were of order four or higher, a large proportion when compared to the other schooling groups. In 1980, there was not a significant difference in the parity distribution for women in the 8+ years of schooling groups: more than 75 percent of births were of orders one and two and less than 10 percent were of order four or higher. In 1991, the differences between the three groups indicating years of schooling (8-10, 11 and 12+) started to increase. Births of the first order were 84 percent for the higher educated (12+ yrsch), 81.6 percent for the group with 11 yrsch and 77.5 percent for the 8-10 yrsch group. Births of order four or higher were 4.5 percent, 6 percent and 9 percent, respectively. In 2010, 91 percent of births were of the first order for the 12+ yrsch group, 88.9 percent for the group with 11 yrsch and 78.5 percent for the group 8-10 yrsch. Considering births of order 4 or higher, the percentages were 1.5 percent, 3.5 percent and 7.6 percent, respectively.

Figure 4: Cumulative parity distribution by birth order and years of schooling. Brazil. 1980 to 2010


Figure 4
Cumulative parity distribution by birth order and years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010
Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010

Figure 5 shows the mac for first and second order births, according to years of schooling. Results show that the mac1 decreases or remains constant for groups with 0-7, 8-10 and 11 yrsch, even between 2000 and 2010. The only group for which the mac1 increases is the one representing the more highly educated (12+ yrsch). This provides evidence that these women are delaying first births. Analyzing the mac2 figure, one can observe that the more highly educated women are also delaying births of the second order.

Figure 5: Mean age of childbearing for first (MAC 1) and second (MAC2) order births by years of schooling. Brazil. 1980 to 2010


Figure 5
Mean age of childbearing for first MAC 1 and second MAC2 order births by years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010
Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010

The bf model estimates an adjusted tfr, which represents the one that would be observed in the absence of changes in the mac. When the adjusted values are higher than the observed, it means that changes in the mac are decreasing the observed tfr and women are postponing births. In this case, one can say that there is a positive tempo effect. When the observed values are higher than the adjusted, it means that changes in the mac are inflating the observed tfr and women are anticipating births. In this case, one can note that there is a negative tempo effect. It is important to re-emphasize that this work is not concerned with the value of the tempo effect itself, but with its sign (positive or negative).

Table 5 shows the results of the application of the bf model to the 1980, 1991, 2000 and 2010 Brazilian Demographic Censuses. The application allows the estimation of the adjusted tfr for 1991, 2000 and 2010. For the 0-7 yrsch group, the results indicate that in 1991 and 2000 the observed tfr was inflated by anticipated births. In 2010, the observed tfr was lower than the adjusted rate, suggesting birth postponement. For the 8-10 and 11 yrsch groups, the results indicate oscillation in the tempo effect signals, suggesting that they had not yet entered a sustainable births postponement process. For the higher educated women (12+ yrsch), the results suggest that births have been postponed for a long period.

Table 5: TFR (observed) and TFR adjusted by BF Model, by years of schooling. Brazil. 1980 to 2010

Table 5
TFR observed and TFR adjusted by BF Model by years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 201

The bf model estimates an adjusted tfr, which represents the one that would be observed in the absence of changes in the mac. When the adjusted values are higher than the observed, it means that changes in the mac are decreasing the observed tfr and women are postponing births. In this case, one can say that there is a positive tempo effect. When the observed values are higher than the adjusted, it means that changes in the mac are inflating the observed tfr and women are anticipating births. In this case, one can note that there is a negative tempo effect. It is important to re-emphasize that this work is not concerned with the value of the tempo effect itself, but with its sign (positive or negative).

Table 5 shows the results of the application of the bf model to the 1980, 1991, 2000 and 2010 Brazilian Demographic Censuses. The application allows the estimation of the adjusted tfr for 1991, 2000 and 2010. For the 0-7 yrsch group, the results indicate that in 1991 and 2000 the observed tfr was inflated by anticipated births. In 2010, the observed tfr was lower than the adjusted rate, suggesting birth postponement. For the 8-10 and 11 yrsch groups, the results indicate oscillation in the tempo effect signals, suggesting that they had not yet entered a sustainable births postponement process. For the higher educated women (12+ yrsch), the results suggest that births have been postponed for a long period.

Discussion

The present study was aimed at investigating whether Brazil is a country of fertility transitions, i.e., if we can clearly identify more than one stage of the fertility transition among Brazilian women. The proposal of this research was to examine various aspects strictly related to fertility and, therefore, did not explore family formation patterns, migration and numerous other factors. The analyses were performed by grouping women into four distinct groups, defined according to their educational level. We analyzed trends in fertility levels, the mean age of childbearing (mac) and parity composition.

Brazil, as a whole, seems to be completing the (First) Demographic Transition. Fertility is below the replacement level, the mac is starting to increase and the percentage of higher order births is still decreasing. The current scenario results from a process that is consistently changing. It is well known that Brazil is a country of great social and economic inequality, which is reflected in the demographic indicators. In this sense, it was almost guaranteed that we would find groups in different stages of fertility transition. It was also quite assured that more highly educated women would be facing the Second Demographic Transition, while those with less education would be in the first stage. However, an issue that was more difficult to determine was how the intermediate schooling groups were being affected.

In order to determine the stage of the demographic transition that each group was in, we defined some specific conditions that needed to be met. To be in the second stage (sdt), a group needed to exhibit the following: fertility below the replacement level, a positive tempo effect and a high (and growing) percentage of low order births. Furthermore, the group should be displaying the characteristics in a sustainable way. The opposite conditions place a group in the first stage of the demographic transition (fdt). In this sense, one can say that Brazil is a country of fertility transitions, because it is possible to identify groups experiencing the two “extremes” of the conditions cited above. The more highly educated (12+ yrsch) are facing the sdt, while those with least amount of education (0-7 yrsch) are still facing the fdt. The other two groups (8-10 and 11 yrsch) are in an intermediate stage.

Being in an intermediate stage means that the groups have characteristics of both stages of the demographic transition or that changes are not consolidated. Beginning in 2000, the groups with 8-10 and 11 yrsch present below replacement fertility levels and high percentages of first and second order births. Both of these characteristics could place these two groups in the sdt. At the same time, the mac for first and second order births is still decreasing, parity composition was almost constant between 2000 and 2010, and the sign (positive or negative) of the tempo effect varies during this period. These elements do not place the two groups (8-10 and 11 yrsch) in the sdt. Something that may explain this apparent contradictory behavior is a combination of greater access to education and socioeconomic heterogeneity. This practice places women who have very different socioeconomic statuses and familiar background characteristics in the same group.

These groups may sometimes adopt the reproductive behavior of the more highly educated. This can happen either because of the media paradigm, the labor market participation of women is increasing or because family planning policies tend to make contraceptive methods more accessible. The key fact is that differences are decreasing over time and are continuing to decrease even more. One justification of this tendency is that, according to the 2006 Demographic Health Survey (dhs), 46 percent of births in Brazil were not planned or desired, which shows a lack of efficient contraception. This lack tends to affect women from poorer socioeconomic conditions and any improvement will also have strong consequences. Another possibility is that these groups will remain heterogeneous. This will occur if some individuals in the groups reach higher educational levels without incorporating new reproductive behaviors. In other words, family background or socioeconomic group reproductive characteristics may play a more important role on a group’s overall reproductive behavior.

A fertility analysis by educational attainment suggests that levels may continue to decline. Assuming the scenario that there is no change in the composition of the population by educational level, the fertility should drop because: (i) public policies are making contraceptive methods more affordable; (ii) fertility levels have been declining in all educational groups, regardless of which stage of transition they are experiencing; (iii) although they are at different paces and levels, all educational groups are moving towards the completion of the fdt.

The scenario of maintaining a constant population composition by educational level is very unlikely. In addition to the federal government actions in place to ensure that the population finishes at least basic education, there are also initiatives that are allowing people with lower socioeconomic conditions to have greater access to a university education. A few years ago, the government required public universities to adopt a quota system. This policy reserved a portion of the vacancies for low-income students or for those who had completed their basic education in public schools. The government also created funding programs for students at private universities. Thus, the expectation is that the group with 12+ yrsch will continue to increase. Unlike the groups with 8-10 and 11 yrsch, the more educated group has been quite homogeneous regarding reproductive behavior.

Supplementary material
References
Ariès, P. (1980). “Two successive motivations for the declining birth rate in the West”, Population and Development Review, 6(4), New York: Population Council, pp. 645-650.
Bongaarts, J. (2002). “The end of fertility transition in the developed world”, Population and Development Review, 28(3), New York: Population Council, pp. 419-443.
Bongaarts, J. and Feeney, G. (1998), “On the quantum and tempo of fertility”, Population and Development Review, 24(2), New York: Population Council, pp. 271-291.
Bongaarts, J. and Sobotka, T. (2012). “Demographic explanation for the recent rise in European fertility: Analysis based on the tempo and parity-adjusted total fertility”, Population and Development Review, 38(1), New York: Population Council, pp. 83-120.
Brass, W. (1975). Methods for estimating fertility and mortality from limited and defective data. Chapel Hill (North Carolina): The North Carolina Center.
Cliquet, R. L. 1991. The second demographic transition: fact or fiction?, Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Population Studies, vol. 23.
Coleman, D. (2004). “Why we don’t have to believe without doubting in the ‘Second demographic transition’ –some agnostic comments”, Vienna Yearbook of Population Research 2004. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press, pp. 11-24.
Coleman, D. (2006). “Immigration and Ethnic Change in Low-Fertility Countries: A Third Demographic Transition”, in Population and Development Review, 32(3), New York: Population Council, pp. 401-446.
Easterlin, R. A. (1978). “The economics and sociology of fertility: a synthesis”, in Charles Tilly (ed.), Historial studies of changing fertility. Princeton (New Jersey): Princeton University, pp. 57-133.
Goldstein, J. R., Sobotka, T. and Jasilioniene, A. (2009) “The end of ‘lowest-low’ fertility?”, in Population and Development Review, 35(4), New York: Population Council, pp. 663-700.
Kohler, H. P., Billari, F. C. and Ortega, J. A. (2002). “The emergence of lowest-low fertility in Europe during the 1990s”, in Population and Development Review, 28(4), New York: Population Council, pp. 641–681.
Köhler, H.P. and Philipov, D. (2001). “Variance effects in the Bongaarts-Feeney formula”, in Demography, vol. 38, num. 1, Silver Spring: Population Association of America, pp.1-16.
Leridon, H., (1987). “La Seconde Révolution Contraceptive. la Régulation des Naissances en France de 1950 à 1985. Présentation d’un Cahier de l’ined”, in Population, 2, Paris: Institut National d’Études Démographiques, pp. 359-367.
Lesthaegue, R. J. and Neidert, L. (2006). “The Second Demographic Transition in the United States: Exception or Textbook Example?”, in Population and Development Review, 32(4), New York: Population Council, pp. 669-698.
Miranda-Ribeiro, A. (2007), Reconstrução de Histórias de Nascimentos a partir de Dados Censitários: aspectos teóricos e evidências empíricas. doctoral dissertation, Cedeplar/Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.
Ryder, N. B. (1956). “Problems of trend determination during a transition in fertility”, in The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 34 (1), New York: Milbank Memorial Fund, pp. 5-21.
Sobotka, T. (2004). Postponement of childbearing and low fertility in Europe. doctoral thesis, University of Groningen, Dutch University Press, Amsterdam, xiv +298 pp.
Sobotka, T. (2008). "The rinsing importance of migrants for childbearing in Europe, overview Chapter 7", Demographic Research. Rostock: Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, vol. 19, article 9, pp. 225-248.
Van de Kaa, D. J. (2002), The Idea of a Second Demographic Transition in industrialized Countries. paper presented at the Sixth Welfare Policy Seminar of the National Institute of Population and Social Security, Tokyo, Japan, 2002. Available at http://www.ipss.go.jp/webj-ad/webjournal.files/population/2003_4/kaa.pdf. Access on July 10th 2012.
Van Imhoff, E. and Keilman, N. (2000). “On the quantum and tempo of fertility: comment”, in Population and Development Review, 26(3), New York: Population Council, pp. 549-553.
Notes
Notes
1 Data come from the undp and are available at http://hdrstats.undp.org/en/indicators/103006.html
Author notes
Doutora em Demografia (cedeplar/ufmg/Brasil); Pesquisadora da Fundação João Pinheiro/mg. Atualmente coordena a pesquisa “Déficit Habitacional no Brasil 2010” e é colaboradora do “Núcleo de Demografia” da Fundação João Pinheiro. Suas principais linhas de pesquisa são: projeção populacional, fecundidade, migração, demografia da educação e habitação. Publicações recentes: A. de Miranda-Ribeiro, E. Rios Neto, L. Gonçalves e J. A. M. de Carvalho, “Efeitos tempo, parturição e quantum no Brasil: indicadores de período e evidências empíricas”, em Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, núm. 30, vol. 1, 2013, pp. 145-170; A. de Miranda-Ribeiro, F. P. M. Ferreira, J. L. R. Riani, K. R. L. Marinho e M. C. S. Camargos, Tendências demográficas em Minas Gerais e implicações para as políticas públicas, Cadernos de Estudos Sociais, vol. 27, 2012, pp. 141-165; A. Miranda-Ribeiro e P. Miranda-Ribeiro, “Para além da filiação religiosa: religião, religiosidade e o panorama religioso em Ribeirão das Neves-MG, Brasil”, em Horizonte: Revista de Estudos de Teologia e Ciências da Religião (online), vol. 9, 2011, pp. 715-728; A. de MirandaRibeiro, E. L. Rios Neto e J. A. de Carvalho, “Reconstrução de histórias de nascimentos a partir de dados censitários: uma análise comparativa de duas metodologias”, em Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, vol. 26, 2009, pp. 21-35.
Doutor em Demografia (cedeplar/ufmg/Brasil); Professor Adjunto do Departamento de Geografia do Instituto de Geociências da Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Atualmente é Vice coordenador do programa de pós-graduação em Análise e Modelagem de Sistemas Ambientais. Suas principais linhas de pesquisa são: projeção populacional, distribuição espacial da população, métodos de análise regional e desenvolvimento econô- mico, teoria e métodos quantitativos, modelagem de sistemas, planejamento urbano e regional. Publicaciones recientes: R. A. Garcia, “Estimativas dos Emigrantes Internacionais do Brasil entre 1995 e 2000: uma aplicação do método das razões intercensitária de sobrevivencia”, em Revista Brasileira de Estudos de População, núm. 30, vol. 1, 2013, pp. 99-123; R. A. Garcia, C. Ferreira Lobo e A. de Miranda-Ribeiro, “As transformações das áreas de influência migratória dos polos econômicos brasileiros nos períodos entre 1980 e 2010”, em Geografías, vol. 8, 2012, pp: 24-41.
Table 1
Population, Growth Rate (%) and Total Dependency Ratio. Brazil. 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010

Figure 1
Age structure. Brazil. 1980 to 2010.
Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 201
Table 2
Reproductive age women % by years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010

Figure 2
Total fertility rate TFR Brazil 1960 to 2010
Source: Own Children Method (1960-2000); PNAD (2006-2009); Brazilian Demographic Census 2010

Figure 3
Cumulative parity distribution by order Brazil 1980 to 2010
Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010
Table 3
Mean age of childbearing (MAC). total and by birth order. Brazil. 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses. 1980 to 2010
Table 4
Total fertility rate by years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses. 1980 to 2010

Figure 4
Cumulative parity distribution by birth order and years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010
Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010

Figure 5
Mean age of childbearing for first MAC 1 and second MAC2 order births by years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010
Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 2010
Table 5
TFR observed and TFR adjusted by BF Model by years of schooling Brazil 1980 to 2010

Source: Brazilian Demographic Censuses, 1980 to 201
Buscar:
Contexto
Descargar
Todas
Imágenes
Scientific article viewer generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc