Servicios
Descargas
Buscar
Idiomas
P. Completa
Modelling the influence of radiata pine log variables on structural lumber production
Elvis Gavilán; Rosa M. Alzamora; Luis A. Apiolaza;
Elvis Gavilán; Rosa M. Alzamora; Luis A. Apiolaza; Katia Sáez; Juan Pedro Elissetche; Antonio Pinto
Modelling the influence of radiata pine log variables on structural lumber production
Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología, vol. 25, 02, 2023
Universidad del Bío-Bío
resúmenes
secciones
referencias
imágenes

Abstract: We run logit models to explain the variability of Pinus radiata structural lumber in 71 second and third unpruned logs. The response variable was the proportion of lumber with a static modulus of elasticity greater or equal than 8000 MPa, pMSG8+, and the explanatory variables were log volume, branch index, largest branch, log internode index, wood basic density, and acoustic velocity. The average pMSG8+ volume was 44,30 % and 36,18 % in the second and third log respectively. Ten models were selected based on meeting statistical assumptions, their goodness of fit, and the statistical significance of their parameters. The best models (R2 - adj. > 0,75) included acoustic velocity (AV) as explanatory variable, which explained 56,25 % of the variability of pMSG8+. Models without AV presented goodness of fit ranging from 0,60 to 0,75 (R2 - adj.), and variables with the highest weight to explain the variability of pMSG8+ were volume, followed by wood basic density, branch index, and largest branch. It is possible to model pMSG8+ from log variables even when acoustic velocity is not available; however, this requires wood basic density models calibrated for the Pinus radiata growing zone.

Keywords: Acoustic technology, log variables, Pinus radiata, regression models, structural lumber.

Carátula del artículo

ARTÍCULO

Modelling the influence of radiata pine log variables on structural lumber production

Elvis Gavilán
Universidad de Concepción, Chile
Rosa M. Alzamora
Universidad de Concepción, Chile
Centro Nacional de Excelencia para la Industria de la Madera, Chile
Luis A. Apiolaza
University of Canterbury, New
Katia Sáez
Universidad de Concepción, Chile
Juan Pedro Elissetche
Universidad de Concepción, Chile
Universidad de Concepción, Chile
Centro Nacional de Excelencia para la Industria de la Madera, Chile
Antonio Pinto
Universidad de Concepción, Chile
Maderas. Ciencia y tecnología, vol. 25, 02, 2023
Universidad del Bío-Bío

Received: 12 December 2020

Accepted: 27 September 2022

Funding
Funding source: ANID
Contract number: FB210015
Funding
Funding source: Universidad de Concepción
Contract number: 220.142.041-INI
Introduction

The quality of natural inputs, such as logs, is commonly evaluated by their performance generating products with high prices. Under a production perspective log attributes have the role of input-traits related to lumber production (Alzamora et al. 2013). Multipurpose forest tree species, such as P. radiata, feed fiber, structural and appearance wood markets that require different wood trait profiles. The value of solid wood is determined by attributes that satisfy two sets of usage requirements: appearance and structural end-uses. Appearance wood is influenced by quantity and quality traits such as volume, color, defects, knots, and resin spots (Beauregard et al. 2002). Structural wood is mostly determined by dynamic modulus of elasticity, wood basic density, volume, and branching (Arriaga et al. 2013, Tsehaye et al. 2000, Tsuchikawa 2007, Xu and Walker 2004). Several of these traits are under genetic control, and they could be modified by silviculture and processing technology (Schimleck et al. 2019).

Obtaining wood traits information from logs is not simple; logs are naturally heterogeneous, creating problems for product differentiation and for definition of quality grades and standards. Fortunately, there have been significant advances on non-destructive approaches to measure and predict wood properties such as dynamic modulus of elasticity from trees and logs (Dickson et al. 2003, Lasserre et al. 2005, Matheson et al. 2002, Soto et al. 2012, Waghorn et al. 2007).

According Ross (2015) and Schimleck et al. (2019), non-destructive tools can measure the physical and the mechanical properties of a piece of material without altering its end-use capabilities and using such information to make decisions regarding appropriate applications. Consequently, non-destructive acoustic methods can increase the efficiency of chain value in wood production (Chauhan and Walker 2006). Apiolaza (2009) and Ivković et al. (2009) indicated that tools based on acoustics principles could be used for screening at a very early age and be related to several properties like modulus of elasticity, dimensional stability, and fibre length’, among others.

Soto et al. (2012) used acoustic tools on standing trees for exploring influence of tree stocking on the dynamic modulus of elasticity in a mature P. radiata plantation growing in Biobío Region, Chile, and they reported the high variation between logs coming from a single stand. An application of acoustic methods to assess structural wood quality in logs, with the corresponding log outturn and grading, was reported by Jones and Emms (2010). These authors modeled log-level green and kiln-dried board modulus of elasticity, based on acoustic log velocity and green density.

In Chile, the prediction of structural and appearance P. radiata log outturn has been partially solved by using computed x-ray tomography scanners, such as the CT-Log (Schmoldt et al. 1993). This technology reconstructs internal log features, allowing the assessment of the optimum cutting solution in real-time. In a similar way, integrated efforts between wood researchers and forest companies have developed CALIRO-Saw (2014), a sawmill simulator based on real logs that include internal log features and generate products using lumber grading rules specified by the users. Unfortunately, all these technologies are available for a reduced group of producers due to high costs and operational issues. However, in absence of scanners and sawing simulators to support log segregation and processing decisions, we can use variables traditionally recorded in the field during primary log sorting to predict the proportion of structural lumber.

The objective of this study was to develop models that explain the variability of structural lumber with static modulus of elasticity greater or equal to 8000 MPa using log variables: volume (VOL), acoustic velocity (AV), wood basic density (BD), branch index (BI), largest branch (LB), corewood (CW) and internode index (INT). The models that use AV were compared with those that use BD and other variables regularly measured at the field.

Materials and methods
Log and lumber attributes

Log and lumber data were provided by the New Zealand Wood Quality Initiative, as a sample of 71 Pinus radiata (D. Don) unpruned 5 m long logs (35 second and 36 third logs) coming from managed and mature trees with ages between 26 and 28 years old. Table 1 presents a summary of log attributes. Log volume (VOL) was estimated by using the Smalian formula (Bruce 1982), which considers the small and large log end-diameters and the log length (5 m). Branch index (BI) is the mean diameter of the four largest branches of the log, one per quadrant (North, East, West, and South). Largest branch (LB) is the diameter of the largest branch of the log. Branches have a negative influence on structural lumber production, where high branch angle and size reduce the quality of structural products (Grant et al. 1984, Xu and Walker 2004).

Internode index (INT) is the sum of the lengths of internodes greater or equal than 0,6 m divided by the log length (Grace and Carson 1993). 0,6 m is the critical value for short clear wood products in the local industry, particularly for the finger-joint processing (Fernández et al. 2017). Corewood (CW), is the inner part of the stem (considering the first 10 growth rings, juvenile wood), which presents low wood quality for most end-uses, including low wood basic density, short cells, high microfibril angle, high spiral grain, and high longitudinal shrinkage (Xu and Walker 2004). CW was measured as the percentage of the cross-section at the large end diameter of the log.

Basic density (BD) is the amount of dry matter (at 12 % moisture level) per unit of green volume, a trait highly related to strength, stiffness and hardness in outerwood.

Modulus of elasticity measures a wood’s stiffness, and dynamic modulus of elasticity, or Young’s modulus of elasticity (MOEd) which according Beall (2001) it is estimated by a dynamic phenomenon that consists in passing of stress waves within wooden materials that can be released in wood and analyzed and affiliated with mechanical properties.

Table 1
Mean values and standard deviations (SD) of second and third log attributes.

The acoustic measurements (AV) in logs to estimate MOEd were collected with the Director HM200 tool (Fibre-gen, New Zealand). Logs attributes assessed in the study have been reported as influencing traits to produce structural lumber from P. radiata (Ivković et al. 2006, Jones and Emms 2010, Waghorn et al. 2007), and to characterize the most efficient log attributes profile to produce structural lumber grades (Alzamora et al. 2013).

The statistical analysis were performed and generated using R version 3.4.4 (R Core Team 2019).

Sawmill product evaluation

Once the logs were assessed in the field, they were processed at the mill, and assessed for static modulus of elasticity (MOEs) by using a testing machine. Processing aimed to maximize the recovery of lumber with a static modulus of elasticity greater or equal than 8000 MPa. The volume of lumber grade recovery for each log type is in Table 2, where MSG stands for machine stress graded, and the number is the MOEs in MPa.

Table 2
Descriptive statistics of lumber grades volume (m3) per log.

Model components

An analysis of correlations was addressed to notice relationships between log attributes. The correlation matrix results are shown in Table 3. It was noticed higher correlation between BD and AV and pMSG8+, and between BI with LB, AV, VOL and pMSG8+ . The results about variables and correlations were used to define variables being used in the modeling regressions.

Table 3
Correlations matrix between log attributes.

Modeling regression functions requires information on the response and predictor variables, as well as assumptions about distributions. In this study, the response variable is the lumber proportion with a static modulus of elasticity greater or equal than 8000 MPa, which will be named as pMSG8+ (%). The predictors are LOG (a categorical variable to indicate second or third log), VOL, BI, LB, BD, AV, INT and CW. Equation 1 presents the functional form of the model.

pMSG8+ corresponds to the proportion of structural lumber derived from the ith log and xi is the vector of j attributes in the ith log, and ɛ is model error. Equation 2 illustrates the calculation of pMSG8+:

In summary, Equation 2 represents the proportion of commercial volume with MOEs greater or equal to 8000 MPa.

We run models to obtain the best goodness of fit, and meeting the normality, independence, and homogeneous variance of residuals assumptions, as well as accounting for multicollinearity of the predictors. Normality of the residuals was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test and homoscedasticity with de Breusch-Pagan test. We used a logit transformation of the response to avoid predictions of the proportion outside of the range of 0 to 1. Equation 3 illustrates the calculation of pMSG8+ in a logit model:

The new response variable is ,as Gujarati and Porter (2010) suggest for transforming a response variable defined as a proportion. Thus, the multiple linear regressions were fitted using the z variable; however, for recovering the original response variable (pMSG8+), we used the transformation variable .

Results and discussion

The average proportion of lumber with a static modulus of elasticity higher than or equal 8000 MPa was 37,04 % in the second log, and 31,55 % in the third log. These results could be explained by the slightly superior MOEd in third logs (Table 1). This result does not follow the trend reported by Xu and Walker (2004), who indicate that the highest MOEd would be concentrated in the second log, between 4 m to 8 m, and then decrease. The correlations between log attributes, and structural lumber production resulted according to comparable studies (Ivković et al. 2006). Thus, there was a negative and significant correlation between AV and VOL (-0,63, p < 0,05). The correlation between AV and BD was also significant (0,66, p < 0,05). The average predictor variables are similar to other reported studies (Apiolaza 2009). For instance, the maximum values of AV and LB for second and third logs were 3,59 km/s and 3,45 km/s, and 110 mm and 125 mm, respectively which are similar to those obtained by comparable studies (Xu and Walker 2004).

Concerning structural lumber products (≥ MSG8), at least one structural board was generated in 86 % of the second logs, and 83 % of the third logs

Table 4a
Multiple regression models to estimate structural lumber production (pMSG8+).

* Significant at 0,1 level; ** significant at 0,05 level; *** significant at 0,01 level.

Table 4b
Multiple regression models to estimate structural lumber production (pMSG8+).

* Significant at 0,1 level; ** significant at 0,05 level; *** significant at 0,01 level.

The high significance of the correlations between structural lumber volume (≥MSG8) and log variables supported building models to explain pMSG8+. Table 4a4b presents the resulting models explaining the variability of the proportion of structural lumber volume in terms of log variables.

Collinearity between explanatory variables of the models was tested by variance inflation factors (VIF), which identifies the correlation between independent variables and the strength of that correlation (Gujarati and Porter 2010). A VIF value of 1 indicated that there is no correlation between this independent variable and any others. Results indicated VIF values of all models and variables were less than 3, which indicated weak multicollinearity, and it was not necessary to do corrective measures (Gelman and Hill 2007). Thus, both coefficients and p-values of models presented in Table 4a 4b are statistically consistent to explain the variability of pMSG8+ coming from P. radiata unpruned logs.

For the studied set of logs, AV explained 56,25 % of the variability of structural lumber volume (≥ MSG8), (p < 0,01), which supports the importance of this information, as well as the results of comparable studies (Waghorn et al. 2007). Wood density (BD) explained 46,24 % of structural lumber volume (> 8000 MPa) variation, which confirmed why this variable is considered a central wood property for multiple end uses (Kimberley et al. 2015).

Models 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in Table 4 showed the best performance in terms of goodness of fit (R2 - adj > 0,75). Model 1 presented an R2 - adj. of 0,82 and all coefficients were significantly different from zero (p < 0,01). AV had a high weight to explain the variability of pMSG8+, which supports results by Jones and Emms (2010). Considering Model 1 for the second log and using the average values of the explanatory variables BI, INT, AV, and CW, the estimated value of pMSG8+ was 39 %. When increasing AV by 1 %, this proportion increased more than proportionally by 3 % because the velocity goes as a squared variable in the formula to estimate the MOEd.

As we expected, branching represented by branch index (BI), the largest branch (LB), as well as corewood (CW), had a negative contribution to the pMSG8+ estimations. Branching has a negative influence on the production of structural grades, where high branch angle and diameter reduce the quality of structural products (Beauregard et al. 2002, Xu and Walker 2004). Increasing BI by 1 % generated a decrease less than proportional of 0,35 % in pMSG8+ (Model 1, second log), and this decrease ranged from 0,25 % to 0,58 % across all models that considered the variable BI. In models that included LB as an explanatory variable, the pMSG8+ reduction ranged from 0,34 % to 0,38 % when increasing LB by 1 %. Alzamora et al. (2013) reported a similar trend when valuing the effect of branches in the value recovery of logs for structural end uses; an extra millimeter in branch diameter decreased the log value by US$ 0,27. In New Zealand, the largest branch (LB) is the branching variable used to classify and price logs due to its high correlation with structural grades recovery.

Conclusions

As we expected, branching represented by branch index (BI), the largest branch (LB), as well as corewood (CW), had a negative contribution to the pMSG8+ estimates. Branching negatively influences the structural grades production, where high branch angle and branch diameter reduce the quality of structural products. AV, BI, LB, BD, and CW had a significant contribution to explain the recovery of structural lumber grades (≥ MSG8), and the magnitude and sign of their coefficients along the ten models were comparable with those reported by the literature.

The proportion of structural lumber (pMSG8+) was strongly related to acoustic measurements and negatively associated with branching variables. Acoustic velocity (AV) was the explanatory variable with the highest weight, explaining 31,55 % of pMSG8+ variability in the set of second and third logs. The log internode index (INT) also had a positive contribution to explain the variability of pMSG8+ because the higher the internode is, the lower is the negative influence of branches and knots on structural wood quality.

The largest branch (LB) and the branch index (BI) made an equivalent contribution across the models. This result is propitious for using LB as operative criteria to characterize logs because collecting LB information is less time consuming that determining the branch index (BI).

Modeling the variability on pMSG8+ was possible based on a set of variables collected in primary logs classification processes such as BI, LB, CW, INT, and other more expensive variables acoustic velocity (AV) and wood basic density (BD). Models using AV presented higher goodness of fit than those using BD. However, models including BD would be more appealing because they could use mean wood basic density information derived from wood density models used by forest companies. This study's results are also pertinent for Chile since structural lumber exported to Europe must be mechanically certified by European standard in grades C16 and C24, corresponding with a static modulus of elasticity of 7900 MPa and 10200 MPa, respectively.

Supplementary material
Acknowledgments

We acknowledge data provided by Wood Quality Initiative (New Zealand), Technological Research with Project Grant ANID BASAL FB210015 (CENAMAD) and to Vicerrectoría de Investigación y Desarrollo, Universidad de Concepción (project VRID N°220.142.041-INI).

References:
Alzamora, R.M.; Apiolaza, L.A.; Evison, D.C. 2013. Using a production approach to estimate economic weights for structural attributes of Pinus radiata wood. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 28(3): 282-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2012.734328
Apiolaza, L.A. 2009. Very early selection for wood quality: screening for early winners. Annals of Forest Science 66(6): 1-10. https://www.doi.org/10.1051/forest/2009047
Arriaga, F.; Monton, J.; Segues, E.; Íñiguez-Gonzalez, G. 2013. Determination of the mechanical properties of P. radiata timber by means of longitudinal and transverse vibration methods. Holzforschung 68(3): 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2013-0087
Beall, F.C. 2001. Wood Products: Nondestructive Evaluation. Encyclopedia of Materials: Science and Technology. Second Edition. Elsevier: Oxford: 9702-9707. https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-08-43152-6/01761-7
Beauregard, R.L.; Gazo, R.; Ball, R.D. 2002. Grade recovery, value, and return-to-log for the production of NZ visual grades (cutting and framing) and Australian machine stress grades. Wood and Fiber Science 34(3): 485-505. https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/viewFile/1586/1586
Bruce, D. 1982. Butt Log Volume Estimators. Forest Science 28(3): 489-503. https://academic.oup.com/forestscience/article-abstract/28/3/489/4656564
Caliro-Saw . 2014. Simulador de aserrío Caliro-Saw. Allware y la Universidad Austral de Chile: Chile. http://tienda.caliro.cl/index.php?route=information/information&information_id=5
Chauhan, S.S.; Walker, J.C.F. 2006. Variations in acoustic velocity and density with age, and their interrelationships in radiata pine. Forest Ecology and Management 229(1-3): 388-394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.04.019
Dickson, R.L.; Raymond, C.A.; Joe, W.; Wilkinson, C.A. 2003. Segregation of Eucalyptus dunnii logs using acoustics. Forest Ecology and Management 179(1-3): 243-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00519-4
Fernández, M.P.; Basauri, J.; Madariaga, C.; Menéndez-Miguélez, M.; Olea, R.; Zubizarreta-Gerendiain, A. 2017. Effects of thinning and pruning on stem and crown characteristics of radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don). iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry 10(2): 383-390. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor2037-009
Gelman, A.; Hill, J. 2007. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press: New York. United States. http://www.stat.columbia.edu/~gelman/arm/
Grace, J.C.; Carson, M.J. 1993. Prediction of internode length in Pinus radiata stands. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 23(1): 10-26. http://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/17731/NZJFS2311993GRACE10_26.pdf
Grant, D.J.; Anton, A.; Lind, P. 1984. Bending strength, stiffness, and stress-grade of structural Pinus radiata: effect of knots and timber density. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 14(3): 331-348. https://www.scionresearch.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/30894/NZJFS1431984GRANT331_348.pdf
Gujarati, D.N.; Porter, D.C. 2010. Econometría. Mc. Graw Hill: México D. F. México. https://www.marcialpons.es/libros/econometria/9786071502940/
Ivković, M.; Gapare, W.J.; Abarquez, A.; Ilic, J.; Powell, M.B.; Wu, H.X. 2009. Prediction of wood stiffness, strength, and shrinkage in juvenile wood of radiata pine. Wood Science and Technology 43(3): 237-257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-008-0232-3
Ivković, M.; Wu, H.X.; McRae, T.A.; Powell, M.B. 2006. Developing breeding objectives for P. radiata structural wood production. I. Bioeconomic model and economic weights. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36(11): 2920-2931. https://doi.org/10.1139/x06-161
Jones, T.G.; Emms, G.W. 2010. Influence of acoustic velocity, density, and knots on the stiffness grade outturn of radiata pine logs. Wood and Fiber Science 42(1): 1-9. https://wfs.swst.org/index.php/wfs/article/view/736
Kimberley, M.O.; Cown, D.J.; McKinley, R.B.; Moore, J.R.; Dowling, L.J. 2015. Modelling variation in wood density within and among trees in stands of New Zealand-grown P. radiata. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science 45(22): 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40490-015-0053-8
Lasserre, J.P.; Mason, E.G.; Watt, M.S. 2005. Effects of genotype and spacing on Pinus radiata (D. Don) corewood stiffness in an 11 year-old experiments. Forest Ecology and Management 205(1-3): 375-383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.037
Matheson, A.C.; Dickson, L.R.; Spencer, D.J.; Joe, B.; Ilic, J. 2002. Acoustic segregation of Pinus radiata logs according to stiffness. Annals of Forest Science 59(5-6): 471-477. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2002031
R Core Team. 2019. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing: Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Ross, R.J. 2015. Nondestructive Evaluation of Wood. General Technical Report FPL-GTR-238. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory: Madison, WI. United States https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/48688
Schmoldt, D.L.; Occeña, L.G.; Abbott, L.A.; Gupta, N.K. 1993. Nondestructive evaluation of hardwood logs: CT scanning, machine vision and data utilization. Nondestructive Testing and Evaluation 15: 279-309. https://doi.org/10.1080/10589759908952876
Soto, L.; Valenzuela, L.; Lasserre, J.P. 2012. Efecto de la densidad de plantación inicial en el módulo de elasticidad dinámico de árboles en pie y trozas de una plantación de pino radiata de 28 años, en la zona de arenales, Chile. Maderas. Ciencia y Tecnologia 14(2): 209-224. https://www.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-221X2012000200008
Tsehaye, A.; Buchanan, A.H.; Walker, J.C.F. 2000. Selecting trees for structural timber. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff 58(3): 162-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001070050407
Tsuchikawa, S. 2007. A review of recent near infrared research for wood and paper. Applied Spectroscopy 42(1): 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704920601036707
Waghorn, M.J.; Watt, M.S.; Mason, E.G. 2007. Influence of tree morphology, genetics, and initial stand density on outerwood modulus of elasticity of 17-year-old Pinus radiata. Forest Ecology and Management 244(1-3): 86-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.057
Schimleck, L.; Dahlen, J.; Apiolaza, L.A.; Downes, G.; Emms, G.; Evans, R.; Moore, J.; Pâques, L.; Van den Bulcke, J.; Wang, X. 2019. Non-Destructive Evaluation Techniques and What They Tell Us About Wood Property Variation. Forests 10(9): 1-50. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10090728.
Xu, P.; Walker, J.C.F. 2004. Stiffness gradients in radiata pine trees. Wood Science and Technology 38(1): 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00226-003-0188-2
Notes
Author notes

Corresponding autor: egavilan@udec.cl

Table 1
Mean values and standard deviations (SD) of second and third log attributes.

Table 2
Descriptive statistics of lumber grades volume (m3) per log.

Table 3
Correlations matrix between log attributes.

Table 4a
Multiple regression models to estimate structural lumber production (pMSG8+).

* Significant at 0,1 level; ** significant at 0,05 level; *** significant at 0,01 level.
Table 4b
Multiple regression models to estimate structural lumber production (pMSG8+).

* Significant at 0,1 level; ** significant at 0,05 level; *** significant at 0,01 level.
Buscar:
Contexto
Descargar
Todas
Imágenes
Scientific article viewer generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc