Servicios
Descargas
Buscar
Idiomas
P. Completa
Effect of container size and types on the root phenotypic characters of Capsicum
M.S.V. Raviteja; R.H Laxman; K Rashmi;
M.S.V. Raviteja; R.H Laxman; K Rashmi; S Kannan; M.R. Namratha; K Madhavi Reddy
Effect of container size and types on the root phenotypic characters of Capsicum
Journal of Horticultural Sciences, vol. 16, núm. 2, pp. 261-270, 2021
Society for Promotion of Horticulture
resúmenes
secciones
referencias
imágenes

Abstract: Capsicum genus comprised of several cultivars is considered as an important spice crop worldwide. Roots play a vital role in a plant to mine water from the deeper layers of the soil. Although, characterisation for root traits have been made using different containers in many crops, such efforts for phenotyping root characteristics in Capsicum species are limited. Therefore, the experiment was initiated to find out the influence of container size on root characteristics and also to identify the appropriate container for high throughput phenotyping of Capsicum species for desirable root characteristics. Nine genotypes belonging to different Capsicum spp. were grown in three types of containers having different dimensions. Among the three types of containers, the bucket type container with dimension of 32 cm height 30 cm diameter with 23 kg soil media capacity was most suitable for phenotyping root characteristics compared to PVC pipe and pot type. Subsequently, 18 genotypes were phenotyped for plant growth and root characteristics in the bucket type container. The genotypes IHR 4517, IHR 3529, IHR 4501, IHR 4550, IHR 4491 and IHR 3241 with better root characteristics were identified.

Keywords: Capsicum, container, root characteristics and plant growth.

Carátula del artículo

Original Research Papers

Effect of container size and types on the root phenotypic characters of Capsicum

M.S.V. Raviteja
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India
R.H Laxman
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India
K Rashmi
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India
S Kannan
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India
M.R. Namratha
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India
K Madhavi Reddy
ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, India
Journal of Horticultural Sciences, vol. 16, núm. 2, pp. 261-270, 2021
Society for Promotion of Horticulture

Recepción: 30 Enero 2020

Revisado: 28 Mayo 2021

Aprobación: 29 Mayo 2021

INTRODUCTION

The genus Capsicum comprises several cultivars that are grown worldwide. In addition to their use as spices and food vegetables, Capsicum species have also been used in pharmaceutical industries. The genus Capsicumhas five domesticated species, Capsicum annuum L., C. baccatum L., C. chinense Jacq., C. frutescens L., and C. pubescens Ruiz and Pav. However, among them, Capsicum annuum L. is distributed world over with greatest economic importance and is part of many dishes mainly because of its spicy taste, pungency, appealing colour and flavor. India is the world’s largest producer and exporter of chilli, contributing about 25% of world’s chilli production (National Horticultural Board, 2017).

Several abiotic stresses during critical stages of crop growth and development severely affect the productivity of Capsicum sp. inadequate water availability is a major abiotic stress which adversely affects growth and productivity of chilli crop (Bhutia et al., 2018). The major growing areas in India experience water limiting conditions due to limited water resources. In India in some parts, chilli is grown under rainfed conditions. The sporadic water stress is a common feature that causes considerable reduction in productivity of chilli, through modification in various morpho-physiological and bio-chemical processes (Singh, 1994). The antagonistic effects of water deficit stress have been studied by several workers in chilli (Cantore et al., 2000; Kirnak et al., 2003; Antony and Singandhupe, 2004; Khan et al.,2008; Gunawardena and De-Silva 2014; R’Him and Radhouane, 2015; George and Sujatha, 2019).

Some of the plant’s adaptive strategies under deficit water stress situations are; deep root system, higher water use efficiency (WUE) and tissue water retention through modifications in leaf, stomatal and cuticular characteristics (Basu et al., 2016). These adaptive features help plants to maintain higher tissue water content under deficit moisture stress and facilitate them to delay the imminent adverse effects of water stress. Roots play a major role under water deficit conditions by acquiring water from the deeper layers of the soil.

They also communicate with above ground parts through signaling pathways. The growth and development of plants is controlled through the alterations in root morphology and physiology. Modifications were noticed in root to shoot transport of signaling molecules including hormones, proteins, RNAs and mineral nutrients (DoVale and Neto, 2015).

The restricted growth and development of plants by limited water availability could be overcome through root morphological plasticity at different soil moisture levels (Forde 2009). Under water limited conditions, roots improve the ability of crop plants to maintain water relations by exploring available water in the soil profile. Identification of root characteristics that enhance the plant’s capability to mine soil water and sustain productivity is very essential.Several workers have attempted studies on various root characteristics and have elucidated the role of root characteristics like deep root system (Sashidhar et al.,2000; Sinclair and Muchow 2001; Venuprasad et al., 2002), thick root system (Chang et al., 1986), root to shoot ratio (Fukai and Cooper 1995), enhanced root system (Price and Tomos, 1997), root penetrating ability (Ray et al., 1996) and higher number of roots in the crown region (Kinyua et al., 2003).

Understanding the role of roots in improving tolerance and maintenance of water relations under water limiting conditions is very important. In this direction quantification of the root characteristics and their role in enhancing water stress tolerance is of primary relevance. Conventional crop improvement approaches have played a principal role in many crops for enhancing drought tolerance (Sreenivasulu et al., 2007). The desirable root characteristics like, deeper root length, large root volume, high root dry weight, and higher root-to-shoot ratio coupled with thick lateral roots were observed to confer water stress tolerance in chilli germplasm IIHR 4502 (Capsicum chinense) (Naresh et al., 2017). Since, phenotyping root characteristics under field conditions are highly cumbersome and challenging, researchers have been relying on assessing the desirable root characteristics in container grown plants. Studies have also shown relationships between controlled-environment root vigor and field root vigor, indicating that evaluations at early stage are predictive of future root performance (Wasson et al., 2012). Using containers for measurement of root systems reduces the growing medium volume and enables proper removal of the root system as compared to plants grown in field (Neumann, 2009). There is a need for identification of suitable container type and size that provide congenial growing conditions for expression of genetic potential and also enable easy extraction of root system to phenotype root characteristics.

Though studies have been conducted to characterize root characteristics using different containers in many crops, such efforts for phenotyping root characteristics in Capsicum species are very much limited (Kulkarni and Phalke, 2009; Naresh et al., 2017). Hence, the objective of the study was to identify appropriate container and size for high throughput phenotyping of root characteristics which facilitate selection of genotypes having desirable root characteristics for water mining.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Experiment was carried out during 2018-2019 at the Division of Basic Sciences, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR-IIHR), Bengaluru. The experimental site is located at 13o58’ N latitude, 78°E longitude and 890 m above mean sea level. Seeds of Capsicum sp. genotypes used in the study were obtained from the Division of Vegetable Crops, ICAR- Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (ICAR- IIHR), Bengaluru.

In order to achieve objectives of the study, two experiments were conducted. First experiment was carried out using three different containers to identify appropriate container for high throughput phenotyping of root characteristics. Second experiment was conducted to phenotype for desirable root characteristics using 18 genotypes belonging to different Capsicum sp. in the suitable container identified in the first experiment.

Identification of appropriate container for high throughput phenotyping of root characteristicsIdentification of appropriate container for high throughput phenotyping of root characteristics

In order to identify appropriate container for high throughput phenotyping of root characteristics, nine genotypes belonging to different Capsicum sp. IHR 3226, IHR 3455, IHR 3575, IHR 4517, IHR 3476 (C. annuum) IHR 3240, IHR 3241, IHR 4491(C. baccatum) and IHR 3529 (C. chinense) were selected. The genotypes were evaluated in three types of containers having different dimensions and soil media holding capacity. The containers used were: (i) bucket type container (Empty paint container, 30 cm diameter, 32 cm height having capacity to hold 23 kg soil), (ii) PVC pipe container (20 cm diameter, 64 cm height having capacity to hold 26 kg soil) and (iii) pot type container (18 cm diameter, 27 cm height having capacity to hold12 kg soil). The containers were filled with soil, Farm Yard Manure (FYM) and sand (2:1:1 v/v). The experiment was laid out in a factorial completely randomized block design with five replications.

Phenotyping of Capsicum sp. genotypes in appropriate container for desirable root characteristics

Eighteen genotypes belonging to different Capsicum sp. were evaluated for root characteristics in the bucket type container (30 cm diameter, 32 cm height having capacity to hold 23 kg soil). The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized block design with five replications.

  1. Seedling raising and crop care: The seeds of genotypes used in both the experiments were sown in pro trays filled with coco peat as a growing medium. The seedlings were maintained in the shade net nursery for 45 days and recommended cultural practices were adopted to maintain plant health status and population. Forty-five-day old seedlings were transplanted into the containers. The plants were provided with recommended dose of fertilizer and crop protection measures. The plants were irrigated regularly to maintain 100 per cent field capacity.

  2. Growth parameters: The observations in both the experiments were recorded at peak flowering stage (50 DAT). Plant height was measured using graduated scale and expressed in centimeters. The number of primary branches were counted manually at the point of initiation. The plant shoot parts were excised and the leaf and stem portions were separated. The entire root portion was carefully extracted from the soil medium using water jet to clean the soil. Soon after extracting the roots, observations on root parameters like root length (using graduated scale), root volume (water displacement method), number of primary roots and fresh and dry weights were recorded. Fresh weights of the root and shoot samples were measured immediately after extraction by using a Sartorius BSAZZAS-CW balance. The root, stem and leaf parts were dried in oven separately at 80ºC for 72 h to achieve stable weight. The dry weight was recorded as total biomass accumulated and expressed as gram per plant.

    To quantify the leaf area, representative sample of 20 leaves from each plant was taken and the leaf area was determined using leaf area meter (Biovis, PSM-L2000, India). Then the leaves were kept in oven at 70ºC for five days and leaf dry weight was measured using Sartorius BSAZZAS-CW balance. The ratio of leaf area to the leaf dry weight was computed as specific leaf area (SLA). The leaf dry weight of each plant was multiplied with SLA to arrive at the total plant leaf area (TLA).

  3. Root: shoot ratio: It was arrived by dividing root dry matter with shoot dry matter.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA: The data obtained in different experiments was analyzed in factorial completely randomized block design and completely randomized block design for first and second experiment, respectively using two factors statistical package OPSTAT developed by CCSHAU (Sheoran et al.,1998).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Plants manifest physiological and morphological modifications in response to change with soil volume. The container size and type influence root volume and in turn determine the dry matter distribution between above and below ground parts. Studies have shown that with doubling in pot size there is an average increase of 43% plant mass (Poorter, 2012). Container size is known to influence morphological and physiological changes in crops like tomato (Oagile et al., 2016), bell pepper (Weston, 1988), squash (Nesmith, 1993) and cabbage (Csizinszky and Schuster, 1993). Alterations in container size leads to changes in available rooting volume which subsequently affects plant growth.

Identification of appropriate container for high throughput phenotyping of root characteristics

The container size plays a major role in plant root and shoots growth. The root length was not significantly influenced by the container type. However, among the three containers, higher root length was observed in PVC pipe container compared to bucket type and pot type containers. The root volume in bucket type container was 35.8% and 72.4% higher compared to pot type and PVC pipe containers, respectively (Figure 1). The studies conducted in bell pepper have shown that the container size has influence on the root volume and plant growth (Weston, 1988; Nesmith et al.,1992). In this experiment, among the three types of containers, the plants grown in bucket type container produced significantly a greater number of primary roots (44.8) compared to pot type (33.1) and PVC pipe (25.4) containers (Figure 1). Studies conducted by Cantliffe, (1993) and Kharkina et al., (1999) have shown that there is a strong positive correlation between container size and root biomass. In the present study, significantly higher root fresh weight and dry weights were observed in bucket type container compared to other two types of containers (Figure 1). The genotypes IHR 4491, IHR 3241, IHR 4517 and IHR 3529 produced significantly higher root fresh weight as compared to remaining genotypes (Figure 1). Plants grown in bucket type container recorded 73.14 % (4.32 g) and 40.86% (5.31 g) higher root dry weight compared to PVC pipe and pot type containers (Table 1).


Figure 1
Influence of containers on root length (A), root volume (B), primary root number (C) and root fresh weight (D) of Capsicum sp.

Healthy root system growth promotes better above ground canopy growth. Hence, providing appropriate space for adequate root growth is essential. It is observed that the shoot growth is greatly impacted by varying container size and root restriction (Poorter, 2012). The plant height was significantly higher in bucket type container compared to remaining types of containers. Genotypes, IHR 3241 (68.1 cm) and IHR 3226 (57.2 cm) recorded significantly higher plant height compared to rest of the genotypes (Table 2). Tomato plants when grown in containers with low volume showed reduction in shoot height and biomass (Peterson et al., 1991). Hence, providing better rooting space helps the plants to produce higher above ground biomass with increased shoot height. Among the three types of containers, plants grown in bucket type produced significantly a greater number of branches compared to remaining two types of containers (Table 2). In bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.), root restriction caused reduction in number of branches (Nesmith et al.,1992). In container grown bell pepper plant, reduction in leaf area was observed mainly due to smaller and fewer leaves per plant (Weston, 1988; Nesmith et al., 1992). With the increase in container size, the leaf area and shoot biomass has increased (Cantliffe, 1993). In this experiment, the leaf area was significantly higher in plants grown in bucket type container (5690 cm2) as compared to pot (3797 cm2 ) and PVC pipe (2690cm2 ) containers (Table 2).

Table 1
Influence of containers on root dry weight and shoot dry weight in Capsicum sp

Table 2
Influence of containers on plant height leaf area and number of branches in Capsicum sp

Table 3
Variability in root and shoot growth characteristics among 18 Capsicumsp genotypes

RL Root length, RV: Root volume, PRN: Primary root number, RFW: Root fresh weight, RDW: Root dry weight, SDW: Shoot dry weight, PH: Plant height, BN: Branch number and LA: Leaf area Phenotyping of Capsicum genotypes for desirable root characteristics

Shoot growth is greatly impacted by varying container size and root restriction in tomato (Kemble et al., 1994) and soybean (Krizek et al.,1985). In this study, among the three types of containers, plants grown in bucket type container produced significantly higher amount of shoot biomass compared to remaining two types of containers. Plants in bucket type container produced 57.1% (15.9 g) and 114.2% (23.3 g) higher shoot biomass than plant grown in pot type and PVC pipe containers, respectively (Table 1). Therefore, the bucket type container with higher soil volume and area enabled the Capsicum spp. genotypes to express their genetic potential with higher shoot and root growth.

Roots, stems and leaves are functionally interdependent and these three systems maintain a dynamic balance in biomass production and distribution. It is clearly evident from the study that the bucket type container provided enough rooting space for Capsicum spp. genotypes to express their genetic potential in terms of shoot and root biomass production. Hence, the bucket type container was chosen for further studies on phenotyping Capsicum spp. genotypes for desirable root characteristics.

The importance of plant phenotyping based on specific root characteristics like root length, number of primary roots and root volume are of practical value for crop improvement (Garcia, 2015). Genetic potential of a genotype for root characteristics plays a critical role during growth and metabolic aspects of the plants. In this study, to know the genetic potential and behavior of each genotype under optimal moisture condition Capsicum sp. genotypes were evaluated for desirable root characteristics and shoot growth. The results clearly indicated that genotypes, IHR 4501, IHR 4491, IHR 3241, IHR 4550, IHR4517, IHR 3529 exhibited

desirable root characteristics such as root length, root volume, primary root number, root fresh and dry weight. The genotypes, IHR 3982 and IHR 3447 showed poor root characteristics (Table 3). Studies have indicated that root length, root volume and root dry weight have strong positive correlation with total dry matter production (Lakshmamma et al., 2014). The genotypes which showed higher root length and volume also produced higher biomass because of adequate water and nutrients uptake from deeper layers of the soil and maintained the tissue water potential (Khan et al., 2008).

Under ample supply of water and nutrient, the plant height, leaf area, branch number and shoot biomass production are dependent on the size of the root system (Zakaria et al., 2020). Our results clearly demonstrated that genotypes, IHR 3241, IHR 4501, IHR 4491, IHR4517 and Guntur Local exhibited better shoot growth in terms of plant height, number of branches, leaf area and shoot biomass. The genotypes, Chikkaballapur Local, IHR 3447 and IHR 3982 showed poor shoot growth (Table 3). In fact; leaf area determines the light interception capacity of a crop and is often used as a surrogate for plant growth and above ground biomass. From the results it is clear that the genotypes having higher leaf area showed better shoot biomass. Concurrently, our results suggested that number of branches in a plant is independent with plant height. The branching pattern in a plant depends on the genetic makeup of each genotype and it is not linked with plant height and other characteristics. Similar observations were made in chilli (Bijalwan et al., 2018) and tomato (Malaker et al., 2016).

At optimal moisture condition, shoot and root dry weights are interred linked (Brdar-Jokanovic et al., 2014). Root to shoot ratio is an important index and it reflects the plant health status. In this regard our results confirms that genotypes, IHR 4550, IHR 4501, IHR 3529 and IHR 4491 recorded significantly higher root to shoot ratio compared to other genotypes. The genotypes, IHR 4108, IHR 3455 and IHR 3226 showed significantly lower root shoot ratio (Table 3).

Though enough rooting space was available in the bucket type container only few genotypes had higher shoot and root growth. This could be due to the genetic potential of the genotypes exhibiting higher root and shoot biomass (Chowdary et al., 2015). Based on the growth pattern with respect to root and shoot characteristics, six genotypes, IHR 4517 (C. annuum), IHR 3241 (C. baccatum), IHR 4491 (C. baccatum), IHR 4550 (C. chinense), IHR 3529 (C. chinense), IHR 4501 (C. chinense) were identified having desirable root characteristics and IHR 3447 (C. annuum) and IHR 3982 (C. chacoense) were identified having poor root characteristics.

Material suplementario
REFERENCES
Aung, L. H. 1972. Root-shoot relationships. In Pl. Root and Its Environ..: 29–61.
Antony, E. and Singandhupe, R. 2004. Impact of drip and surface irrigation on growth, yield and WUE of capsicum. Agric. WaterManag.65(2): 121-132.
Basu, S., Ramegowda, V., Kumar, A. and Pereira, A. 2016. Plant adaptation to drought stress. F1000Research, 5, F1000 Faculty Rev-1554.
Bhutia K.L., Khanna, V.K., Meetei, T.N.G. and Bhutia, N.D. 2018. Effects of climate change on growth and development of chilli. Agrotechnology.: 180.
Bijalwan, P.S., Meghana, S. and Madhavi, N. 2018. Assessment of genetic divergence in chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) genotypes. Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci..: 1585-1590.
Brdar-Jokanovic, M., Girek, Z., Pavlovic, S., Ugrinovic, M. and Zdravkovic, J. 2014. Shoot and root dry weight in drought exposed tomato populations. Genetika46(2):495-504.
Cantliffe, D. J. 1993. Pre- and post-harvest practices for improved vegetable transplant quality. Hort. Tech.3: 415-417.
Cantore, F. and Boaricaliandro, A.2000. Effect of split-root system water s tress on physiological and morphological aspects of pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). Acta.Hort.537: 321–328.
Chang, T.T., Armenta-Soto, J.L., Mao, C.X., Peiris, R. and Loresto, G.C. 1986. Genetic studies on the components of drought resistance in rice (Oryza sativa L.). In Rice Genetics I: 387-398.
Chowdary, J. A., Karim, M. A., Khaliq, Q. A., Solaiman, A. R. M. and Ahmed, J. U. 2015. Genotypic variations in growth yield and yield components of soybean genotypes under drought stress conditions . J. Agril. Res.40(4): 537-550.
Csizinszky, A. A. and Schuster, D. J.1993. Impact of insecticide schedule, N and K rates, and transplant container size on cabbage yield. Hort. Sci.28: 299-301.
Dovale, J. and Fritsche-neto, R. 2015. Root Phenomics: In Phenomics Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland.12: 49–66.
Eissenstat, D.M. 1992. Costs and benefits of constructing roots of small diameter. J. Plant Nutr. 15: 763–782.
Forde, B. G.2009. Is it good noise? The role of developmental instability in the shaping of a root system. J. Exp. Bot.60: 3989–4002.
Fukai, S. and Cooper, M. 1995. Development of drought resistant cultivars using physio- morphological traits in rice. Field Crop Res.40: 67–86.
George, R. and Sujatha, K. B. 2019. Screening of chilli genotypes for drought tolerance. J. agric. Ecol..: 38-45.
Gunawardena, M. D. M., Silva, C. S. 2014. Identifying the impact of temperature and water stress on growth and yield parameters of chilli (Capsicum annuum L). J. OUSL. 7: 25–42.
Kemble, J. M., Davis, J. M., Gardner, R. G. and Sanders, D. C. 1994. Root cell volume affects growth of compact-growth-habit tomato transplants. Hort. Sci. 29: 261-262.
Khan, M., Farooque, A., Haque, M., Rahim, M. and Hoque, M. 2008. Effects of water stress at various growth stages on the physio- morphological characters and yield in chilli. Bangladesh J. Agr. Res. 33(3): 353- 362.
Kharkina, T. G., Ottosen, C. O. and Rosenqvist, E. 1999. Effects of root restriction on the growth and physiology of cucumber plants. Physiol.Planta. 105: 434–441.
Kinyua, R. J., Njoka., Gesimba. And Birech. 2003. Selection of drought tolerant bread. Wheat genotypes using root characteristics at seedling stage. Int. J. Agric. Rural Dev. .: 9–15.
Kirnak, H., Kaya, C., Higgs, D. and Tas, I. 2003. Responses of drip irrigated bell pepper to water stress and different nitrogen levels with or without mulch cover. J. Pl. Nutr. 26(2): 263–277.
Krizek, D. T., Carmi, A., Mirecki, R. M., Snyder, F. W. and Bruce, J. A., 1985. Comparative effects of soil moisture stress and restricted root zone volume on morphogenetic and physiological responses of soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). J. Expt. Bot.36:25-38.
Kulkarni, M. and Phalke, S. 2009. Evaluating variability of root size system and its constitutive traits in hot pepper (Capsicum annum L.) under water stress. Sci.Hortic.120(2):159-166.
Lakshmamma, P., Prayaga, L. and Sarada, C. 2010. Evaluation of castor ( Ricinus communis L.) germplasm for water use efficiency (WUE) and root characters . IJPGR 23(3): 276-279.
Lakshmamma, P., Prayaga, L., Lavanya, C. and Sarada, C. 2014. Genetic diversit y, variability and heritability for root, shoot and water use efficiency traits in castor (Ricinus communisL.) genotypes. IJPGR27(3): 230- 237.
Malaker A, Akmzhossain, T Akterand MSH Khan, 2016. Variation in morphological attributes and yield of tomato cultivars. Res. Agric. Livest.Fish..(2):287-294.
Naresh, P., Bhatt, R. M., Venkatachalapathi, V., Gangadhararao, P. and Madhavi reddy, K., 2017. Inheritance of root characteristics in an interspecific Cross of Capsicum annuum . Capsicum chinense in the presence of low moisture. Int. J. Veg. Sci.,23(6):575-583.
Nesmith, D. S. 1993. Summer squash response to root restriction under different light regimes. J. Pl. Nutr.16:765-780.
Nesmith, D. S., Bridges, D.C. and Barbour, J.C. 1992. Bell pepper responses to root restriction. J.Pl. Nutr.15:2763- 2776.
Neumann, G., George, T. S. and Plassard, C. 2009. Strategies and methods for studying the rhizosphere - The plant science toolbox. Plant Soil.321: 431–456.
Oagile, O., Gabolemogwe, P., Matsuane, C. and Mathowa, T. 2016. Effect of container size on the growth and development of tomato seedlings. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci..(4):890-896.
Peterson, T. A., Reinsel, M.D. and Krizek, D. T. 1991. Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. cv ‘Better Bush’) plant response to root restriction, root respiration and ethylene generation. J. Expt. Bot.42: 1241-1249.
Poorter, H., Niklas, K. J., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P. and Mommer, L. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots. meta- analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. Tansley Review. New Phytologist 193: 30–50.
Price, A. H. and Tomos, A. D. 1997. Genetic dissection of root growth in rice (Oryza sativaL.). II: mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular markers. Theor. Appl. Genet.95:143–152.
Ray, J. D., Yu, L., Mccouch, S. R., Champoux, M. C., Wang, G. and Nguyen, H. T. 1996. Mapping quantitative trait loci associated with root penetration ability in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor. Appl. Genet.92: 627–636.
R’him, T. and Radhouane, L. 2015. Growth and yield responses of two Tunisian pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) varieties to salinity and drought stress. Int. J. Innov. Sci. Res.14(2): 159–167.
Sashidhar, V. R., Nagalakshmi, V., Mahesh, J. K. and Prasad, T. G. 2000. Should plants keep their canopy cool or allow themselves to grow warm under stress. Curr. Sci.78: 786– 789.
Sheoran, O. P., Tonk, D. S., Kaushik, L. S., Hasija, R. C. and Pannu, R. S. 1998. Statistical software package for agricultural research workers. Recent advances in information theory, statistics & computer applications, Department of Mathematics Statistics, CCS HAU, Hisar, 139-143.
Sinclair, T. R. and Muchow, R. C. 2001. System analysis of plant traits to increase grain yield on limited water supplies. J. Agron. 93:263– 270.
Singh, K. B. 1994. Problems and prospects of stress resistance breeding in chickpea. In: Breeding for stress tolerance in cool-season food legumes, (eds. Singh, K.B., Saxena M.C.), John Wiley, U.K. pp. 17-35.
Sreenivasulu, N., Sopory, S. K. and Kishor, P. B. 2007. Deciphering the regulatory mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance in plants by genomic approaches. Gene 388:1–13.
Venuprasad, R., Shashidhar, H. E., Hittalmani, S. and Hemamalini, G. S. 2002. Tagging quantitative trait loci associated with grain yield and root morphological traits in rice (Oryza sativa L.) under contrasting moisture regimes. Euphytica 128: 293–300.
Wasson, A., Richards, R., Chatrath, R., Misra, S., Prasad, S. S., Rebetzke, G., Kirkegaard, J., Christopher, J. and Watt, M. 2012.Traits and selection strategies to improve root systems and water uptake in water-limited wheat crops. J. Exp. Bot., 63:3485–3498.
Weston, L. A. 1988. Effect of flat cell size, transplant age, and production site on growth and yield of pepper transplants. Hort. Sci.23: 709-711.
Zakaria, N. I. , Ismail, M. R., Awang, Y., Edaroyati, P., Wahab, M and Berahim, Z. 2020. Effect of root restriction on the growth, photosynthesis rate, source and sink relationship of chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) grown in Soilless Culture. BioMed Research International. V: 2020, 14p.
Notas

Figure 1
Influence of containers on root length (A), root volume (B), primary root number (C) and root fresh weight (D) of Capsicum sp.
Table 1
Influence of containers on root dry weight and shoot dry weight in Capsicum sp

Table 2
Influence of containers on plant height leaf area and number of branches in Capsicum sp

Table 3
Variability in root and shoot growth characteristics among 18 Capsicumsp genotypes

RL Root length, RV: Root volume, PRN: Primary root number, RFW: Root fresh weight, RDW: Root dry weight, SDW: Shoot dry weight, PH: Plant height, BN: Branch number and LA: Leaf area Phenotyping of Capsicum genotypes for desirable root characteristics
Buscar:
Contexto
Descargar
Todas
Imágenes
Visor de artículos científicos generados a partir de XML-JATS4R por Redalyc