Carátula del artículo
Asymptotic analysis of Sturm-Liouville problem with Robin and two-point boundary conditions
Šturmo ir Liuvilio uždavinio su Robino ir dvitaške kraštine˙mis sąlygomis asimptotine˙ analize˙
Artu¯ras Štikonas arturas.stikonas@mif.vu.lt
Vilnius University, Lituania
Lietuvos matematikos rinkinys, vol. 63 Ser. A, pp. 9-18, 2022
Vilniaus Universitetas
Recepción: 01 Julio 2022
Publicación: 10 Diciembre 2022
Introduction
Consider the following one-dimensional Sturm–Liouville equation
where the real-valued function is a complex spectral parameter and . We will use the notation .
In this article , where
and .
Then a map is the bijection between and .
We shall investigate Sturm–Liouville Problem (SLP) which consist of equation (1) on with one classical (local) Robin type Boundary Condition (BC)
and another two-point Nonlocal Boundary Condition (NBC)
where . We consider the Dirichlet and the Neumann BC:
too. The Sturm–Liouville problem (1), (4d), (33) was investigated in [2], the Sturm–Liouville problem (1), (4n), (3) was investigated in [4].
1 Asymptotic expansions for Initial Value Problem
In this section we present some statements about solution of IVP. These statements were proved in [3]. We will use them for investigation asymptotic expansions for SLP (1)–(3). Additionally, we introduce some notation related to our asymptotical analysis of this problem.
Let and be a solution of equation (1) satisfying the initial conditions
The function is an analytic (holomorphic) function of s and this function satisfies boudary condition (2). We denote and .
Under the condition that , asymptotic expansions may be obtained for
[3] and
[4]. We will use recursive formula
Lemma 1.(See [3, Lemma 7]) Let
and
. Then for
we have the asymptotic expansions
for
, where
, and
is calculated by (6)
,with
.
Lemma 2. (See [4, Lemma 9].) Let
and
. Then for
we have the asymptotic expansions
for
. Where
and
is calculated by (6) for
with
.
Remark 1. (See [3, Lemma 7], [4, Lemma 7].) In the case and we have the asymptotic expansions:
Remark 2. In the case and we have the asymptotic expansions
where
We can calculate the first functions and in Case d (for function ):
and in Case n (for function ):
We will use an additional index to distinguish cases: (Case d), (in Case n).
The following integral equation holds [1,5]:
If , then the solution of this integral equation is , if , then the solution of this integral equation is . By superposition principle we have
So, we get asymptotic expansions for function .
Lemma 3. Let
and
. Then for
we have the asymptotic expansions
for , where
Remark 3. Formulas (15)–(16) are valid for , but in (7)–(8) we have more accurate the asymptotic expansions with
instead and in (13)–(14).
Corollary 1. If
and
, then we have asymptotic expansions:
Corollary 2.If
and
, then we have asymptotic expansions:
Lemma 4.Let
, are bounded functions.
If
then we have the following equations
where
and functions
Proof. The proof follows from (12) and asymptotic expansions for [3,Corollary 2] and [4,Corollary2].
Remark 4. In the case we have more accurate the asymptotic expansions
Corollary 3. If
and
, then we have asymptotic expansions:
Corollary 4.If
and
, then we have asymptotic expansions:
2 Asymptotic expansions for characteristic equations
Substituting into (3) we get the characteristic equation
Let’s define functions:
where functions and are defined by formulas (15) – (16). For example,
We will use the notation: in Cases in Cases.
Lemma 5.Suppose
in Cases 2 and 3. Then
Proof. In Case 1 we have
From inequalities
we get (in Cases 2 and 3)
Lemma 6. Suppose
in Cases 2 and 3. There exists
such that
for
.
Proof. We estimate
For we have
So, in Cases 2 and 3 there exists such that
for . The proof in Case 1 repeats the proof in Case 2 with .
Lemma 7.Let
and
. Then for
the asymptotic expansion
is valid,
.
Proof. The proof for is the same as in case [4,see Lemma11].
Remark 5. In the case we have (see Corollary 1) the asymptotic expansion
Remark 6. If (the problem (1), (4d), (3)) formula (21) is valid with in Cases 1, 2; in Case 3, and
So, if , then Lemma 5 and Lemma 6 are valid for the problem (1), (4d), (3) with , in Cases 1 and 2, , in Case 3.
Let us consider positive . We investigate equation , with additional condition
Lemma 8.Suppose
in Cases 2 and 3. If
, then (24) is valid. The constant κ is the same for all such x.
Proof. In Case 1 if then and .
In Case 2 we have equation . If are the root of equation , then we get [2, see Lemma 4 and Corollary 3] that .
In Case 3 we have equation . If are the root of equation , then we get [2, see Lemma 5] that .
Remark 7. Lemma 4 and Lemma 5 in [2] were proved for , but it is easy to see, that they are valid for too. So, Lemma 8 is proved for all (see (3)).
Remark 8. If then Lemma 8 is valid with Cases 1 and 2, in Case 3. The proof is the same.
Let’s denote the function
If functions are defined, then we can find functions
and function
If , then
Lemma 9. If
and
, then asymptotic expansion
is valid, where
, are bounded functions.
Proof. The proof can be found in [4, see proof of Lemma 14].
3 Spectral asymptotics for eigenvalues and eigenfunctions
In this section we assume, that in Cases 2, 3. Let us denote domains ( in Case 3), contours , and intervals .
Lemma 10.Suppose
in Cases 2 and 3. If
, then it follows that the number of zeros of functions
and
is the same inside
for sufficiently large k.
Proof. We have (see (22)) . Using Lemma 5 and Lemma 6we estimate on the contours for sufficiently large k. Therefore, by Rouché theorem it follows that the number of zeros of and are the same inside for sufficiently large k.
Corollary 5.If
, then it follows that the number of zeros of functions
and
is the same between
and
for sufficiently large k.
Remark 9. If , then Lemma 10 and Corollary 5 are valid. The proof is the same. In Case 3 isn’t zero of the function for .
From (19) (and (23) for ) we have that function has only one positive root . For example, (and ) for ) in Case 1. In Cases 2 and 3 existence of such root follows from [4, Lemma 4 and Lemma 5]. Thus, function has only one root sk between and for sufficiently large k.
In Case 2 and
If , then sign
for sufficiently large k. This formula is valid in Cases 1 and 3. Moreover, it is valid for . Then from Intermediate Value Theorem at least one root of the function lies in for sufficiently large k. So, is real root for such k.
We have . Then and . The function or
Now we will investigate the distribution of these positive eigenvalues of problem (1)–(3), and we leave out the note about sufficiently large k.
Let us denote . We have that .
Theorem 1.Let
. For eigenvalues
and eigenfunctions
of problem (1)–(3), we have the asymptotic expansions
for sufficiently large k.
Proof. We have . So, all conditions of Lemma 9 are valid, and it follows (27).Then we apply Corollary 1 and get (28).
Corollary 6.Let
. For eigenvalues
and eigenfunctions
of problem (1)–(3), the asymptotic equations
are valid for sufficiently large k, where
.
Corollary 7.If
, then the asymptotic equations
are valid for sufficiently large k, where
is defined by (25)
.
Remark 10. (See [2].) If , then formula (27) and asymptotic expansion
are valid for sufficiently large k. If , then . If , then and
Información adicional
AMS Subject Classification: : 34B24; 34L20; 35R10